Loading...
Item 19 - Attachment A - Exhibit A - Appendix I - Noise Technical Report Appendix I Noise Technical Report Noise Technical Report for The Farm in Poway Project Prepared for: City of Poway 13325 Civic Center Drive Poway, California 92064 Contact: David De Vries, City Planner Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Contacts: Connor Burke, Environmental Analyst; Mark Storm, INCE Bd. Cert. FEBRUARY 2020 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. 11872 i February 2020 Table of Contents SECTION PAGE NO. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................ III 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................ 1 2 REGULATORY SETTING ..................................................................................................................................... 7 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................................... 11 4 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE .................................................................................................................... 15 5 IMPACT DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................................................... 17 6 MITIGATION MEASURES ................................................................................................................................. 35 7 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................ 41 8 REFERENCES CITED ....................................................................................................................................... 43 APPENDICES A Noise Measurement Field Data B Construction Noise Modeling Input and Output C Traffic Noise Modeling Input and Output D Operation Scenarios - Events at The Barn and The Meadow FIGURES 1 Project Vicinity ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Site Plan ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 3 Noise Measurement Locations ........................................................................................................................ 13 NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 ii February 2020 TABLES 1. Measured Community Outdoor Noise Levels .................................................................................................. 11 2 Construction Phase Distance to Nearest Pre-Existing Noise-Sensitive Receptors (in feet) ......................... 17 3 Typical Construction Equipment Maximum Noise Levels ............................................................................... 18 4 Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – The Club .......................................................................... 19 5 Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – The Meadow ................................................................... 20 6 Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – The Barn ......................................................................... 20 7 Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – The Working Farm .......................................................... 21 8 Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – Community Gardens ...................................................... 21 9 Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – Trail System .................................................................... 22 10 Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – The Basins ...................................................................... 22 11 Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – New Homes .................................................................... 23 12 Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – Private Street .................................................................. 24 13 Traffic Noise Modeling Results......................................................................................................................... 26 14 Future Ambient Noise Levels at Residential Facades .................................................................................... 27 11872 iii February 2020 Acronyms and Abbreviations Acronym/Abbreviation Definition AC acre Caltrans California Department of Transportation City City of Poway County County of San Diego CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level CNMP construction noise management plan dB decibel dBA A-weighted decibel DU dwelling unit FHWA Federal Highway Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration HP horsepower ips inches per second Ldn day–night average noise level Leq equivalent noise level over a given period Lmax sound energy level averaged over a specified time period Ln statistical sound level MM Mitigation Measure OS-C Open Space – Conservation OS-R Open Space - Recreation PPV peak particle velocity proposed project The Farm in Poway Project RCNM Roadway Construction Noise Model RMS Root mean square ST short-term noise measurement locations VdB Velocity decibel NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 iv February 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 11872 1 February 2020 1 Introduction and Background This assessment was conducted to address potential noise impacts from the proposed The Farm in Poway Project (proposed project), a residential subdivision with a variety of open spaces and public recreation facilities to be located within a former country club property in the City of Poway (City). The assessment includes examination of noise generation from project construction and project related traffic, and also evaluates future potential noise exposure levels at sample locations of proposed future residences. Construction activity vibration is also evaluated as part of this assessment. Project Description The project site is located in the northern portion of the City and consists of the decommissioned StoneRidge Country Club and its associated 18-hole golf course. The project site bordered by Espola Road to the south, and existing residential communities along St. Andrews Drive to the west and north. The eastern boundary largely adjoins existing homes along Cloudcroft Drive, Tam O’Shanter Drive, and Boca Raton Lane. The project site consists of approximately 117.2 acres and currently has an address of 17166 Stoneridge Country Club Lane, Poway, California 92064. Figure 1 shows the project location within the County of San Diego (County) and the City. Regionally, the City is situated near the middle of the County, approximately 20 miles north of downtown San Diego via I-15. The project site is approximately 2 miles east of I-15. The City of Poway boundary is approximately 0.5 miles to the west. Figure 2 depicts an aerial view of the project site vicinity. The proposed project includes a total of 160 single-family homes and a mix of open space and recreational uses open to the public (see Figure 2, Site Plan) that include the following: The Barn (a multi-purpose event space [e.g., weddings]), The Social (café with outdoor dining), The Butterfly Farm (greenhouse and picnic area), The Club (outdoor pool, tennis courts, and paddleball courts), The Meadow (featuring an amphitheater-style venue for outdoor concerts), a Tot Lot (children play area), a Trail System and pedestrian sidewalks, a Dog Park, and Agri- fields (a.k.a., “the Working Farm”). Uses permitted within the Specific Plan are shown on Table 3.1: Land Use Summary and Exhibit 3.1: Land Use Plan in Chapter 3 of the Specific Plan. Residential land uses would compose approximately 33.85 acres and would range in density from 2.5 to 10.7 dwelling units per acre (DU/AC). Open space uses would compose approximately 70.37 acres and would be comprised of Open Space – Conservation (OS-C) and Open Space – Recreational (OS-R). Approximately 12.96 acres would be private streets. Noise Characteristics Sound is mechanical energy transmitted by pressure waves in a compressible medium, such as air. Noise is defined as sound that is loud, unpleasant, unexpected, or undesired. The sound pressure level (SPL) has become the most common descriptor used to characterize the loudness of an ambient sound level. The unit of measurement of sound pressure is a decibel (dB). Under controlled conditions in an acoustics laboratory, the trained, healthy human ear is able to discern changes in sound levels of 1 dB when exposed to steady, single-frequency signals in the mid- frequency range. Outside such controlled conditions, the trained ear can detect changes of 2 dB in normal environmental noise. It is widely accepted that the average healthy ear, however, can barely perceive noise level changes of 3 dB. A change of 5 dB is readily perceptible, and a change of 10 dB is perceived as twice or half as loud (Caltrans 2013a). A doubling of sound energy results in a 3-dB increase in sound, which means that a doubling of sound energy (e.g., doubling the number of daily trips along a given road) would result in a barely perceptible change in sound level. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 2 February 2020 Sound may be described in terms of level or amplitude (measured in decibels), frequency or pitch (measured in hertz, or cycles per second), and duration (measured in seconds or minutes). Because the human ear is not equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies, a special frequency-dependent rating scale is used to relate noise to human sensitivity. The A-weighted decibel (dBA) scale performs this compensation by discriminating against low and very high frequencies in a manner approximating the sensitivity of the human ear. Several descriptors of noise (noise metrics) exist to help predict average community reactions to the adverse effects of environmental noise, including traffic-generated noise. These descriptors include the equivalent noise level over a given period (Leq), the statistical sound level (Ln), the day–night average noise level (Ldn), and the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Each of these descriptors uses units of dBA. Leq is a sound level energy-averaged over a specified time period, represented by a single constant value equivalent to the variable sound energy received at a location. For example, a 1-hour Leq measurement would represent the average amount of energy contained in all the noise that occurred in that hour. Leq is an effective noise descriptor because it allows convenient comparison of time-varying sound levels at different locations. Lmax is the greatest sound level measured during a designated time interval or event. Unlike the Leq metrics, Ldn and CNEL metrics always represent 24-hour periods. Ldn and CNEL also differ from Leq because they apply a time-weighted factor designed to emphasize noise events that occur during the evening and nighttime hours (when speech and sleep disturbance is of more concern). “Time weighted” refers to the fact that Ldn and CNEL penalize noise that occurs during certain sensitive periods. In the case of CNEL, noise occurring during the daytime (7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.) receives no penalty. Noise during the evening hours (7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.) is penalized by adding 5 dB to the measured or predicted Leq values, and nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) noise is penalized by adding 10 dB. Ldn differs from CNEL in that the daytime period is defined as 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., thus eliminating the evening period. Ldn and CNEL are the predominant criteria used to measure roadway noise affecting residential receptors. These two metrics generally differ from one another by no more than 0.5–1 dB, and are thus often considered comparable or even equivalent and interchangeable by many jurisdictions. Vibration is the oscillatory movement of solid mass. Like sound, it is described in terms of frequency and amplitude, which can be expressed as displacement, velocity, or acceleration. For purposes of this analysis and consistent with environmental assessment, vibration is presented and discussed herein as units of velocity (inches per second [ips]) and their decibel equivalents as appropriate. Vibration impacts to buildings are generally discussed in terms of peak particle velocity (PPV), while human annoyance or disturbance is often discussed with root-mean-square (RMS) vibration velocity levels that are converted to decibels (VdB). But for purposes of this analysis, PPV will be used to describe all vibration for ease of reading and comparison. Vibration can impact people, structures, and sensitive equipment or processes (Caltrans 2013b). Common sources of vibration within communities include construction activities and railroad operations. Groundborne vibration generated by construction projects exhibits highest amplitudes during pile driving, rock blasting, soil compacting, jack hammering, and demolition-related activities that involve sudden impacts or other transient impulses of energy delivered to soil and rock strata. Vibration can also be more regularly occurring or even continuous in nature, such as the steady operation of mechanical equipment featuring reciprocating or rotating components that are slightly imbalanced. The maximum vibration level standard used by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for the prevention of structural damage to typical residential buildings is 0.3 ips PPV (Caltrans 2013b). Date: 6/24/2019 - Last saved by: agreis - Path: Z:\Projects\j1187201\MAPDOC\NOISE\Figure1-SiteVicinity.mxdValley VerdeNeighborhoodPark INDIANCANYONLN P ENIN A S T OLD WINERYRD DECANTDR PORT MARNOCK DR TAWNY WAY D ORS ET WAY SOLERAWAY TAM O SHANTER DR ORCHARDBENDRDESPOLA RD STARMOUNTWAY B U T T E R F IE L D T R LEDINA WAY SAINT ANDREWS DR ALDERWOODL NVINTER WAY THESQ U A R EC A LLE COLINA OLD WINERY WAY CUV EECTCIELO CTMERLOTPLLOMASVERDES DR VILLAMOURA DR VENDORPLTINING DR CLOUDCROFTC TCLEECOPL VALLE VERD ETERMARTINCOIT RDOLDCOA C H R D WESTLINGCTOL D W I N E M A S T E R W A Y ANTELOPESTATION V ALLEVERDERDSAGEWOOD DR DE L P A S O D R VALLEDELOBO DR SAGEWOODLNJOYAS CT CORTELOMASVERDESVINEYARDLN BOCARATONLNVIA LO MA D R CLIQUOTCTWILLOW RUN RD OVERLAND PASS WHITE ROCK STATION RD WHITE W O O D CANYON CLOUDCROFT DR ASH HOLLOWXINGRD Project Vicinity The Farm in Poway SOURCE: SANGIS 2017, 2019 0 500250Feet Project Boundary FIGURE 1 NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 4 February 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Not to Scale Site Plan The Farm in Poway FIGURE 2SOURCE: The Farm in Poway, LLC, 2020Z:\Projects\j1187201\MAPDOC\IS NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 6 February 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 11872 7 February 2020 2 Regulatory Setting Regulatory Setting Federal Federal Transit Administration In its Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment guidance manual, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) recommends a daytime construction noise level threshold of 80 dBA Leq over an 8-hour period (FTA 2018) when “detailed” construction noise assessments are performed to evaluate potential impacts to community residences surrounding a project. Although this FTA guidance is not a regulation, it can serve as a quantified standard in the absence of such limits at the State and local jurisdictional levels. State California Code of Regulations, Title 24 Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations sets standards which new development in California must meet. According to Title 24, interior noise levels are not to exceed 45 dB CNEL for new multifamily residences, hotels, and other attached residences. Title 24 also requires that an interior acoustical study demonstrating that interior noise levels due to exterior sources will be less than or equal to 45 CNEL be performed for affected multifamily structures and hotels that are exposed to exterior noise levels in excess of 60 CNEL. California Department of Health Services Guidelines The State Department of Health Services has developed guidelines of community noise acceptability for use by local agencies (OPR 2003). Selected relevant levels are listed here:  Below 60 dBA CNEL: normally acceptable for low-density residential use  50 to 70 dBA: conditionally acceptable for low-density residential use  Below 65 dBA CNEL: normally acceptable for high-density residential use and transient lodging  60 to 70 dBA CNEL: conditionally acceptable for high-density residential, transient lodging, churches, educational, and medical facilities. The normally acceptable exterior noise level for transient lodging use is up to 65 dBA CNEL. Conditional acceptable exterior noise levels range up to 70 dBA CNEL for transient lodging. California Department of Transportation In its Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, Caltrans recommends a vibration velocity threshold of 0.2 ips PPV (Caltrans 2013b) for assessing “annoying” vibration impacts to occupants of residential structures. Although this Caltrans guidance is not a regulation, it can serve as a quantified standard in the absence of such limits at the local jurisdictional level. Similarly, thresholds to assess building damage risk due to NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 8 February 2020 construction vibration vary with the type of structure and its fragility, but tend to range between 0.3 ips and 0.4 ips PPV for typical residential structures (Caltrans 2013b). Local City of Poway Noise Municipal Code Section 8.08.040 and 8.08.100 of the Poway Municipal Code establishes sound level limits within the City and describes regulations on construction equipment, respectively. These sections are reproduced or summarized below. 8.08.040 Sound Level Limits Unless a variance has been applied for and granted pursuant to this chapter, it is unlawful for any person to cause or allow the creation of any noise to the extent that the one-hour average sound level, at any point on or beyond the boundaries of the property on which the sound is produced, exceeds the applicable limits set forth below, except that construction noise level limits shall be governed by PMC 8.08.100. In addition, the Noise Element addresses nuisance noise and states that it should be unlawful for any person to make or continue any loud, unnecessary noise that causes annoyance to any reasonable person of normal sensitivity. Zone or Land Use Designation Allowable Time Applicable Limit One- Hour Average Sound Level (In decibels) OS-RM, OS, OS/1du, RR-A, RR-B, RR-C, RS-2, RS-3, RS-4, RS-7, and Specific Plan, PRD and PC regulations with a density of 11 dwelling units or less per acre 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 40 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 50 PF, RA, RC, MHP, and Specific Plan, PRD and PC regulations with a density of 11 or more dwelling units per acre 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 55 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. 50 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 45 SPC, MU, CO, CN, CB, CG, TC, A/GC and HC 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 60 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. 55 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 50 MRE, SC, LI, LI/S and IP Anytime 70 The sound level limit at a location on a boundary between two zoning districts is the arithmetic mean of the respective limits for the two districts Fixed location public utility distribution or transmission facilities located on or adjacent to a property line shall be subject to the noise level limits of this section, measured at or beyond six feet from the boundary of the easement upon which the equipment is located. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 9 February 2020 8.08.100 Construction Equipment Except for emergency work, it is unlawful for any person, including the City, to operate any single or combination of powered construction equipment at any construction site, except as outlined in subsections A and B of this section: A. It is unlawful for any person, including the City, to operate any single or combination of powered construction equipment at any construction site before 7:00 a.m. or after 5:00 p.m. on Mondays through Saturdays or at any time on a Sunday or holiday except as provided below. For purposes of this section, “construction” does not include minor home repairs, lawn mowing, gardening and similar types of routine maintenance as identified in PMC 8.08.170(D). 1. The City Engineer may permit, in writing, the use of powered construction equipment during specific hours before 7:00 a.m. or after 5:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, or any time on a Sunday or holiday, if he or she determines that such operations are not detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the surrounding community, that the conduct of the activity is limited by the nature of the work, and that it is in the best interest of the public to perform the work outside of normal hours and days of work. 2. A residential property owner constructing a single-family residence, or constructing an addition to, or otherwise modifying, a single-family residence for personal occupancy may operate powered construction equipment on Sundays or holidays between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in compliance with the requirements of subsection B of this section; provided, that: a. The type of equipment used is limited to handheld construction equipment or equipment powered by small electrical motors, including, but not limited to, small cement mixers, table saws, and similar small equipment; and b. The construction is not carried out for profit or livelihood. Upon request of the City, a property owner shall provide documentation, to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services, of personal occupancy of the residence, or the intent to personally occupy the residence. B. No such equipment, or combination of equipment regardless of age or date of acquisition, shall be operated so as to cause noise at a level in excess of 75 decibels for more than eight hours during any 24- hour period when measured at or within the property lines of any property which is developed and used either in part or in whole for residential purposes. These sound levels shall be corrected for time duration in accordance with the following table: Total Duration in 24 Hours Decibel Level Allowance Total Decibel Level Up to 15 Minutes +15 90 Up to 30 Minutes +12 87 Up to 1 Hour +9 84 Up to 2 Hours +6 81 Up to 4 Hours +3 78 Up to 8 Hours 0 75 In the event that lower noise limit standards are established for construction equipment pursuant to State or Federal law, said lower limits shall be used as a basis for revising and amending the noise level limits specified in subsection B of this section. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 10 February 2020 Poway General Plan The General Plan EIR Section 5.10 establishes the following mitigation measure related to noise. Development within the City of Poway, including the Specific Plan planning area, is subject to these measures: “6. The City of Poway shall ensure a safe and pleasant acoustical environment for the residents of Poway through site planning, zoning regulations, architectural design standards, and building construction regulations.” Proposed Specific Plan The Farm in Poway Specific Plan (Specific Plan) adopts noise level thresholds that are summarized by the following excerpts (SMA Ventures LLC 2019):  Section 3.2.3, Additional Open Space Standards, “(7) The noise level emanating from any use or activity shall not exceed 60 dBA CNEL, as the acceptable outdoor noise exposure level when measured at at the exterior boundaries of the Specific Plan area unless otherwise specified herein. This may be achieved through the construction of sound attenuation barriers based upon an approved noise study.”  Section 3.2.3.B, under the description for regular events: “The aggregate sounds level from live (acoustic) or amplified music does not exceed the maximum total weighted decibel (dBA) at a distance of 10 feet as specified in Table 3.4: Event Sound Levels.” For convenience, Table 3.4 from the Specific Plan is reproduced below: Venue Location and Time of Regular Event (up to 3 hours duration) Maximum Total A-weighted Decibel (dBA) at a Distance of 10 feet1 The Barn + The Social Daytime (8 a.m. to 7 p.m.) Evening (7 p.m. to 10 p.m.) 103 98 The Meadow (Amphitheater) Daytime (8 a.m. to 7 p.m.) Evening (7 p.m. to 10 p.m.) 97 92 Notes: dBA = A-weighted sound pressure level. 1 If Speakers are positioned to distribute amplified sound, they must be positioned in such a manner that linear occlusion occurs between the speaker and the nearest residential receptors outside of the Specific Plan area.  Section 3.2.3.C, Dog Parks, “(3) Noise shall be sound attenuated so that the noise level measured at the exterior boundaries of the Specific Plan area does not exceed 60 dBA CNEL.”  Section 3.3.3, Residential Performance Standards, “The noise level emanating from any residential use or operation within the Residential (R) Land Use Districts shall not exceed 70 dBA CNEL as the acceptable outdoor noise exposure level when measured at the property line. The interior noise levels shall not exceed 45 dBA CNEL for all residential uses.” For purposes of the noise analyses herein and consistent with the Specific Plan, it is assumed that a 70 dBA CNEL standard represents the applicable noise limit for non-transportation and non-construction “stationary” sources of noise associated with anticipated typical project-attributed operation and activities at residential land use property lines within the Specific Plan area. At the property lines of offsite residential land uses that adjoin the exterior boundary of the Specific Plan area, 60 dBA CNEL would be the standard for impact significance—consistent with state planning guidelines. These noise sources include operation of heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) equipment from the newly-created residential and non-residential land uses attributed to the proposed project. 11872 11 February 2020 3 Existing Conditions Noise measurements were conducted on and near the project site on June 11, 2019, to quantify and help characterize the existing pre-project outdoor sound environment. Table 1 provides the locations, date, and times these noise measurements were performed. The noise measurements were taken using a Rion NL-52 sound level meter equipped with a 0.5-inch, pre-polarized condenser microphone with pre-amplifier. The sound level meter meets the current American National Standards Institute standard for a Type 1 (Precision Grade) sound level meter. The accuracy of the sound level meter was verified using a field calibrator before and after the measurements, and the measurements were conducted with the microphone positioned approximately 5 feet above the ground. Table 1. Measured Community Outdoor Noise Levels Receptor Location/Address Date (mm:dd:yy) Time (hh:mm) Leq (dBA) Lmax (dBA) ST1 North of 16616 Espola Rd. Poway, CA 92064 06.11.19 10:20–10:30 a.m. 64.9 75.1 ST2 South of Multi-Family homes on Port Marnock Dr. 06.11.19 11:30–11:40 a.m. 43.1 49.9 ST3 South of 17956 St Andrews Dr. Poway, CA 92064 06.11.19 11:15–11:25 a.m. 42.2 67.5 ST4 East of 17154 Cloudcroft Dr. Poway, CA 92064 06.11.19 11:00–11:10 a.m. 52.5 64.5 Source: Appendix A. Notes: Leq = equivalent continuous sound level (time-averaged sound level); Lmax = maximum sound level during the measurement interval; dBA = A-weighted decibels; ST = short-term noise measurement locations. The four short-term (ST) noise measurement locations were selected to represent sample existing noise-sensitive receivers on and near the project site. These locations are depicted as receivers ST1–ST4 on Figure 3, Noise Measurement Locations. The measured energy-averaged (Leq) and maximum (Lmax) noise levels at these field survey locations are provided in Table 1. The primary noise sources at the sites identified in Table 1 consisted of traffic along adjacent roadways; and, the sounds of rustling leaves, aircraft overflights, distant conversation, and birdsong. As shown in Table 1, the measured sound levels ranged from approximately 42.2 dBA Leq at ST3 to 64.9 dBA Leq at ST1. More details of the collected noise measurement data can be found in Appendix A, Noise Measurement Field Data. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 12 February 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Date: 6/24/2019 - Last saved by: agreis - Path: Z:\Projects\j1187201\MAPDOC\NOISE\Figure3-NoiseMeasurementLocations.mxdValley VerdeNeighborhoodPark INDIANCANYONLN P ENIN A S T OLD WINERYRD DECANTDR PORT MARNOCK DR TAWNY WAY D ORS ET WAY SOLERAWAY TAM O SHANTER DR ORCHARDBENDRDESPOLA RD STARMOUNTWAY B U T T E R F IE L D T R LEDINA WAY SAINT ANDREWS DR ALDERWOODL NVINTER WAY THESQUA R E C A LLE COLINA OLD WINERY WAY CUV EECTCIELO CTMERLOTPLLOMASVERDES DR VILLAMOURA DR VENDORPLTINING DR CLOUDCROFTC TCLEECOPL VALLE VERD ETERMARTINCOIT RDOLDCOA C H R D WESTLINGCTOL D W I N E M A S T E R W A Y ANTELOPESTATION V ALLEVERDERDSAGEWOOD DR DE L P A S O D R VALLEDELOBO DR SAGEWOODLNJOYAS CT CORTELOMASVERDESVINEYARDLN BOCARATONLNVIA LOMA D R CLIQUOTCTWILLOW RUN RD OVERLAND PASS WHITE ROCK STATION RD WHITE W O O D CANYON CLOUDCROFT DR ASH HOLLOWXINGRD ST1 ST4 ST2 ST3 M1 M2 M3 FIGURE 3 Noise Measurement Locations The Farm in Poway SOURCE: SANGIS 2017, 2019 0 500250Feet Project Boundary Noise Measurement Locations Short-term Noise Modeling Location Modeled Receiver Location NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 14 February 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 11872 15 February 2020 4 Thresholds of Significance The following significance criteria are based on Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (14 CCR 15000 et seq.) and will be used to determine the significance of potential noise impacts. Impacts to noise would be significant if the proposed project would result in: a. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. b. Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. c. Expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels (for a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport). For this noise assessment and the Specific Plan, up to 70 dBA CNEL noise exposure at the property lines of residences within the Specific Plan area would be allowed and thus serve as the relevant threshold. At the boundary lines of existing residences outside of (or adjoining) the Specific Plan area, the threshold would be a more stringent 60 dBA CNEL. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 16 February 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 11872 17 February 2020 5 Impact Discussion a) Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Short-Term Construction Less-Than-Significant with Mitigation. Construction noise and vibration are temporary phenomena. Construction of the development proposed in the project would generate noise that could expose nearby receptors to elevated noise levels that may disrupt communication and routine activities. The magnitude of the impact would depend on the type of construction activity, equipment, duration of the construction, distance between the noise source and receiver, and intervening structures. This section of the report discusses the noise levels calculated to result from construction of the project, at nearby sensitive receptors (i.e., existing residences). The construction activities for the proposed project will be varied by component (i.e., Open Space Land Use Districts and Residential Land Use Districts) and location. The construction activities located nearest to a sensitive receptor was used for each phase and component. Representative equipment for residential lot earthwork and for residential building construction was assembled from similar residential subdivision projects that Dudek has evaluated for construction noise. Table 2 summarizes the construction phases and distances to the apparent closest noise-sensitive receptors that are used in the predictive analysis of construction noise levels at these community locations. Distance values of zero indicate the listed construction phase is not applicable to the project feature. Table 2. Construction Phase Distance to Nearest Pre-Existing Noise-Sensitive Receptors (in feet) Construction Phase Project Feature (and distance in feet to nearest NSR) Residential The Farm The Meadow The Club Trail System Road Paving Basin The Working Farm Community Garden Demolition 120 120 0 120 0 0 120 0 0 Site Preparation 50 50 150 50 25 36 15 50 50 Grading 50 50 150 50 25 36 15 50 50 Building Construction 100 360 0 300 25 0 0 0 0 Paving 0 120 0 50 25 36 0 0 0 Architectural Finishes 100 360 0 300 0 0 0 0 0 Note: NSR = noise-sensitive receptor. An Excel-based noise prediction model emulating and using reference data from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) (FHWA 2008) was used to estimate construction noise levels at the nearest occupied noise-sensitive land use. (Although the RCNM was funded and promulgated by the FHWA, it is often used for non-roadway projects, because the same types of construction equipment used for roadway projects are often used for other types of construction.) Input NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 18 February 2020 variables for the predictive modeling consist of the equipment type and number of each (e.g., two graders, a loader, a tractor), the duty cycle for each piece of equipment (e.g., percentage of time within a specific time period, such as an hour, when the equipment is expected to operate at full power or capacity and thus make noise at a level comparable to what is presented in Table 2), and the distance from the noise-sensitive receiver. The predictive model also considers how many hours that equipment may be on site and operating (or idling) within an established work shift. No topographical or structural shielding was assumed in the modeling. The RCNM has default duty-cycle values for the various pieces of equipment, which were derived from an extensive study of typical construction activity patterns. Those default duty-cycle values were used for this noise analysis. Equipment that would be in use during construction would include, in part, graders, backhoes, rubber-tired dozers, loaders, cranes, forklifts, cement mixers, pavers, rollers, and air compressors. The typical maximum noise levels for various pieces of construction equipment at a distance of 50 feet are presented in Table 3. Note that the equipment noise levels presented in Table 3 are maximum noise levels. Typically, construction equipment operates in alternating cycles of full power and low power, producing average noise levels less than the maximum noise level. The average sound level of construction activity also depends on the amount of time that the equipment operates and the intensity of construction activities during that time. Table 3. Typical Construction Equipment Maximum Noise Levels Equipment Type Typical Equipment (Lmax, dBA at 50 Feet) All Other Equipment > 5 HP 85 Backhoe 78 Compressor (air) 78 Concrete Saw 90 Crane 81 Dozer 82 Excavator 81 Flat Bed Truck 74 Front End Loader 79 Generator 72 Grader 85 Man Lift 75 Paver 77 Roller 80 Scraper 84 Welder / Torch 73 Source: DOT 2006. Notes: dBA = A-weighted decibels; Lmax = maximum sound level. With the exception of the concrete saw, and as suggested by the list of Lmax values in Table 3, the maximum noise levels at 50 feet tend not to exceed 85 dBA for common equipment and vehicles anticipated for this kind of multi-use development project. Hourly Leq values at this distance, however, would vary depending on duty cycle. Construction noise in a well-defined area typically attenuates at approximately 6 dB per doubling of distance, as each piece of equipment can be approximated as an individual point-type source. Alternately, a set of equipment in proximity to one another could be considered geographically a common point source; or, on average with respect to time, a set of operating equipment with uncertain positions within a defined area could be considered a common point-source. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 19 February 2020 Proposed project construction would take place both near and far from adjacent, existing noise-sensitive uses. For example, construction near the northern project site boundary would appear to take place within approximately 15 feet of existing residential property lines, but during construction of other proposed project components, construction activities would be much further away from sensitive receptors, as the distance values in Table 3 indicate. Appendix B provides details on the calculations of estimated construction noise, which are summarized in the following paragraphs and categorized in a manner similar to what is presented in the project description. Open Space Land Use Districts The Club The Club would be located towards the middle of the project site, north of the R-C residential district (see Figure 2). Construction activities could occur within 50 feet of the nearest sensitive receiver. Estimated noise levels from the major construction phases were calculated for the nearest noise-sensitive land use, as presented in Table 4. Table 4. Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – The Club Construction Phase (expected equipment types) Estimated 8-hour Leq (dBA) (at nearest distance per Table 2) Demolition (dozer, excavator, concrete saw) 74 Site Preparation (backhoe, dozer, front-end loader) 75 Grading (excavator, grader, scraper) 75 Building Construction (crane, man-lift, generator, backhoe, front-end loader, welder) 64 Paving (paver, roller, other equipment > 5 HP) 74 Architectural Coating (air compressor) 59 Notes: Leq = equivalent continuous sound level (time-averaged sound level); dBA = A-weighted decibel. As presented in Table 4, the estimated construction noise levels are predicted to be as high as 75 dBA equivalent continuous sound level (Leq) over an 8-hour period at the nearest existing residences (as close as 50 feet away) when grading activities take place near the project boundary. Distances to the nearest noise-sensitive receiver are greater, as shown in Table 3, for activities such as demolition and building construction and therefore yield lower 8-hour predicted noise levels. Note that these estimated construction noise levels at a source-to-receiver distance of 50 feet include consideration of limited operation duration of specific anticipated equipment as detailed in Appendix B. By way of example, a grader might make one or more passes on site that are this close to the receiver; but, for the remaining time during the day, the grader is sufficiently farther away—performing work at a more distant location or simply not operating. Therefore, under these conditions, short-term construction noise would be less than significant. The Meadow The Meadow would be located directly adjacent to the east of The Club. Construction activities could occur within 150 feet of the nearest sensitive receiver. Estimated noise levels from the major construction phases were calculated for the nearest noise-sensitive land use, as presented in Table 5. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 20 February 2020 Table 5. Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – The Meadow Construction Phase (expected equipment types) Estimated 8-hour Leq (dBA) (at nearest distance per Table 2) Site Preparation (backhoe, dozer, front-end loader) 71 Grading (excavator, grader, scraper) 75 Notes: Leq = equivalent continuous sound level (time-averaged sound level); dBA = A-weighted decibel. As presented in Table 5, the estimated construction noise levels are predicted to be as high as 75 dBA equivalent continuous sound level (Leq) over an 8-hour period at the nearest existing residences (as close as 150 feet away) when grading activities take place near the project boundary. Therefore, under these conditions and since the predicted 75 dBA 8-hour Leq value is compliant with the City’s threshold for construction noise, short-term construction noise relating to activity for this proposed project feature would be less than significant. The Farm (The Barn and Butterfly Farm) The Farm, a collective reference for both the The Barn and Butterfly Farm proposed project features, would be located at the southernmost portion of the project site, adjacent to Espola Road and at the proposed entrance of the project site at the intersection of Espola Road and Martincoit Road (see Figure 2). Construction activities could occur within 50 feet of the nearest sensitive receiver. Estimated noise levels from the major construction phases were calculated for the nearest noise-sensitive land use, as presented in Table 6. Table 6. Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – The Barn Construction Phase (expected equipment types) Estimated 8-hour Leq (dBA) (at nearest distance per Table 2) Demolition (dozer, excavator, concrete saw) 74 Site Preparation (backhoe, dozer, front-end loader) 75 Grading (excavator, grader, scraper) 75 Building Construction (crane, man-lift, generator, backhoe, front-end loader, welder) 63 Paving (paver, roller, other equipment > 5 HP) 72 Architectural Coating (air compressor) 57 Notes: Leq = equivalent continuous sound level (time-averaged sound level); dBA = A-weighted decibel. As presented in Table 6, the estimated construction noise levels are predicted to be as high as 75 dBA equivalent continuous sound level (Leq) over an 8-hour period at the nearest existing residences (as close as 50 feet away) when grading activities take place near the project boundary. Distances to the nearest noise-sensitive receiver are greater, as shown in Table 3, for activities such as demolition and building construction and therefore yield lower 8-hour predicted noise levels. Note that these estimated construction noise levels at a source-to-receiver distance of 50 feet include consideration of limited operation duration of specific anticipated equipment as detailed in Appendix B. By way of example, a grader might make one or more passes on site that are this close to the receiver; but, for the remaining time during the day, the grader is sufficiently farther away—performing work at a more distant location or simply not operating. Therefore, under these conditions, short-term construction noise would be less than significant. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 21 February 2020 The Working Farm (Agri-Fields) The Working Farm would be composed of agrifields located at the northernmost portion of the project site, along the northwestern and northern project boundaries (see Figure 2). Construction activities could occur within 50 feet of the nearest sensitive receiver. Estimated noise levels from the major construction phases were calculated for the nearest noise-sensitive land use, as presented in Table 7. Table 7. Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – The Working Farm Construction Phase (expected equipment types) Estimated 8-hour Leq (dBA) (at nearest distance per Table 2) Site Preparation (backhoe, front-end loader) 75 Grading (excavator, grader, scraper) 75 Notes: Leq = equivalent continuous sound level (time-averaged sound level); dBA = A-weighted decibel. As presented in Table 7, the estimated construction noise levels are predicted to be as high as 75 dBA equivalent continuous sound level (Leq) over an 8-hour period at the nearest existing residences (as close as 50 feet away) when grading activities take place near the project boundary. Therefore, under these conditions and since the predicted 75 dBA 8-hour Leq value is compliant with the City’s threshold for construction noise, short-term construction noise relating to activity for this proposed project feature would be less than significant. Community Gardens Community gardens would be located throughout the project site, providing future residents a garden plot within walking distance of their home Construction activities could occur within 50 feet of the nearest sensitive receiver. Estimated noise levels from the major construction phases were calculated for the nearest noise-sensitive land use, as presented in Table 8. Table 8. Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – Community Gardens Construction Phase (expected equipment types) Estimated 8-hour Leq (dBA) (at nearest distance per Table 2) Site Preparation (backhoe, front-end loader) 75 Grading (excavator, grader, scraper) 75 Notes: Leq = equivalent continuous sound level (time-averaged sound level); dBA = A-weighted decibel. As presented in Table 8, the estimated construction noise levels are predicted to be as high as 75 dBA equivalent continuous sound level (Leq) over an 8-hour period at the nearest existing residences (as close as 50 feet away) when grading activities take place near the project boundary. Therefore, under these conditions and since the predicted 75 dBA 8-hour Leq value is compliant with the City’s threshold for construction noise, short-term construction noise relating to activity for this proposed project feature would be less than significant. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 22 February 2020 Trail System A multi-use trail system would circulate throughout the project site to provide mobility and recreational opportunities for pedestrians and bicyclists. The majority of the trail system would include decomposed granite or compacted earth trails. Trails along the southwest project boundary would require construction activities that could occur within 50 feet of the nearest noise-sensitive receiver. On average, this anticipated distance between trail construction activity and a receiver would be 25 feet. Some accessory structures, such as a landscaping maintenance shack, would also be installed as part of this construction phase and could be in similar proximity to an existing noise-sensitive receiver. Estimated noise levels from the major construction phases for the trail system were calculated for the nearest noise-sensitive land use, as presented in Table 9. Table 9. Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – Trail System Construction Phase (expected equipment types) Estimated 8-hour Leq (dBA) (at nearest distance per Table 2) Site Preparation (backhoe, front-end loader) 74 Grading (grader) 78 Building Construction (generator, welder / torch) 69 Paving (concrete mixer truck, paver) 74 Notes: Leq = equivalent continuous sound level (time-averaged sound level); dBA = A-weighted decibel. As presented in Table 9, the estimated construction noise levels are predicted to be as high as 78 dBA Leq over an eight-hour period at the nearest existing residences (as close as 25 feet away) when grading activities take place near the project site boundary. Therefore, under these conditions, the predicted eight- hour Leq value would not be compliant with the City’s threshold for construction noise and need mitigation MM-NOI-1. With implementation of MM-NOI-1, impacts would be reduced to being less than significant. The Basins Bio-retention basins are scattered throughout the project site. Construction of these basins would involve site preparation and grading activities as close as 15 feet away from noise sensitive receptors. Estimated noise levels from the construction phases were calculated for the nearest noise-sensitive land use, as presented in Table 10. The detailed RCNM input and output values are provided in Appendix B. Table 10. Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – The Basins Construction Phase (expected equipment types) Estimated 8-hour Leq (dBA) (at nearest distance per Table 2) Site Preparation (backhoe, backehoe, front-end loader) 85 Grading (excavator, grader, scraper) 85 Notes: Leq = equivalent continuous sound level (time-averaged sound level); dBA = A-weighted decibel. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 23 February 2020 As presented in Table 10, the estimated construction noise levels are predicted to be as high as 85 dBA equivalent continuous sound level (Leq) over an 8-hour period at the nearest existing residences (as close as 15 feet away) when grading activities take place near the project boundary. Note that these estimated noise levels at a source-to-receiver distance of 15 feet would only occur when the single loudest piece of heavy equipment is operating along the project boundary for a cumulative period of up to 0.75 hours a day. By way of example, the grader might make multiple passes on site that are this close to the receiver; but, for the remaining time during the day, the grader is sufficiently farther away—performing work at a more distant location or simply not operating. When the entire assemblage of equipment is working right at the edge of the construction zone in each phase, within 15 feet of existing residences, construction noise levels are anticipated to reach up to 85 dBA Leq. Assuming relatively steady work, this would result in an exceedance of the City of Poway construction noise limit of 75 dBA Leq8h. In order to avoid potentially significant construction noise impacts upon existing residences in the project vicinity, mitigation measure MM-NOI-1 shall be implemented as indicated site conditions may warrant. Proper application of temporary noise barriers or comparable sound abatement that may arise as a result of MM-NOI-1 implementation has the ability to realize a 10 dB reduction in noise levels that would correspondingly reduce the predicted 85 dBA eight-hour Leq for the grading phase to a level of 75 dBA Leq and thus compliant with the 75 dBA threshold. With implementation of MM-NOI-1, impacts would be reduced to being less than significant. Residential Land Use Districts New Residential Homes The proposed project would allow for up to 160 single-family homes to be built around the project site. Construction activities during this component could occur within 50 feet of the nearest sensitive receiver. Estimated noise levels from the major construction phases were calculated for the nearest noise-sensitive land use, as presented in Table 11. Table 11. Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – New Homes Construction Phase (expected equipment types) Estimated 8-hour Leq (dBA) (at nearest distance per Table 2) Demolition (dozer, excavator, concrete saw) 74 Site Preparation (backhoe, front-end loader) 75 Grading (excavator, grader, scraper) 75 Building Construction (crane, man-lift, generator, backhoe, welder) 64 Paving (concrete mixer truck, backhoe, air compressor, paver, roller) 74 Architectural Coating (air compressor) 59 Notes: Leq = equivalent continuous sound level (time-averaged sound level); dBA = A-weighted decibel. As presented in Table 11, the estimated construction noise levels are predicted to be as high as 75 dBA equivalent continuous sound level (Leq) over an 8-hour period at the nearest existing residences (as close as 50 feet away) when grading activities take place near the project boundary. Distances to the nearest noise-sensitive receiver are greater, as shown in Table 3, for activities such as demolition and building construction and therefore yield lower 8-hour predicted noise levels. Note that these estimated construction noise levels at a source-to-receiver distance of 50 feet include consideration of limited operation duration of specific anticipated equipment as detailed in Appendix B. By way of example, a grader might make one NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 24 February 2020 or more passes on site that are this close to the receiver; but, for the remaining time during the day, the grader is sufficiently farther away—performing work at a more distant location or simply not operating. Therefore, under these conditions, short-term construction noise would be less than significant. Private Street “B” The proposed project’s internal street network would consist of all private roadways in which construction would involve site preparation, grading, and paving. Construction activities involved with Private Street “B” near the southern boundary of the property could occur as close as approximately 36 feet away from sensitive noise receptors. Estimated noise levels from the major construction phases associated with Private Street “B” were calculated for the nearest noise-sensitive land use, as presented in Table 12. Table 12. Construction Noise Modeling Summary Results – Private Street Construction Phase (expected equipment types) Estimated 8-hour Leq (dBA) (at nearest distance per Table 2) Site Preparation (backhoe, dozer, front-end loader) 78 Grading (excavator, grader, scraper) 78 Paving (paver, roller, other equipment > 5 HP) 77 Notes: Leq = equivalent continuous sound level (time-averaged sound level); dBA = A-weighted decibel. As presented in Table 12, the estimated construction noise levels are predicted to be as high as 78 dBA equivalent continuous sound level (Leq) over an 8-hour period at the nearest existing residences (as close as 36 feet away) when grading activities take place near the project boundary. Note that these estimated noise levels at a source-to-receiver distance of 36 feet would only occur when the single loudest piece of heavy equipment is operating along the project boundary for a cumulative period of up to 0.75 hours a day. By way of example, the grader would make multiple passes on site that are this close to the receiver; but, for the remaining time during the day, the grader is sufficiently farther away—performing work at a more distant location or simply not operating. When the entire assemblage of equipment is working right at the edge of the construction zone in each phase, within 36 feet of existing residences, construction noise levels are anticipated to reach up to 78 dBA Leq. Assuming relatively steady work, this would result in an exceedance of the City of Poway construction noise limit of 75 dBA Leq over an eight-hour period. Although nearby off-site residences would be exposed to elevated construction noise levels, the increased noise levels would typically be relatively short term. It is anticipated that construction activities associated with the proposed project would take place primarily within the allowable hours of the City of Poway (7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday). In the event that construction is required to extend beyond these times, extended hours permits would be required and would be obtained by the applicant. If work were to occur outside of the allowable hours, annoyance or sleep disturbance could result from construction noise; also, due to the relatively limited distance to existing adjacent residences, construction noise annoyance could result even during daytime hours. In order to avoid potentially significant construction noise impacts upon existing residences in the project vicinity, mitigation measure MM-NOI-1 shall be implemented as indicated site conditions may warrant. Proper application of temporary noise barriers or comparable sound abatement that may arise as a result NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 25 February 2020 of MM-NOI-1 implementation has the ability to realize a 10 dB reduction in noise levels that would correspondingly reduce the predicted 78 dBA eight-hour Leq for the grading phase to a level of 75 dBA Leq and thus compliant with the 75 dBA threshold. With implementation of MM-NOI-1, impacts would be reduced to being less than significant. Blasting Blasting operations would be required for site preparation. Rock blasting is the controlled use of explosives to excavate, break down, or remove rock. The result of rock blasting is often known as a rock cut. The most commonly used explosives today are ammonium nitrate/fuel oil-based blends, due to their lower cost compared to dynamite. No more than five (5) blasts, of up to 1.2 tons of explosive each, per day would occur during construction activities. Blasting would only be required where existing topography or geologic conditions require blasting to be conducted, and for purposes of this analysis would be no closer to an existing residential receptor than 400 feet. This analysis also assumes a per-delay charge weight of up to 18.5 pounds that is heavily confined prior to the blast event per industry guidance (Dyno Nobel 2010). With all the delayed charges detonated in succession, the A-weighted hourly Leq is estimated to be 82.2 dBA per blast. For all five blasts occurring within the same 8-hour period, the Leq would be 80 dBA and exceed the City of Poway’s construction noise threshold by 5 dBA; hence blasting noise would result in a potentially significant impact and effective implementation of mitigation measure MM-NOI-2 would be required. Blasting involves drilling a series of boreholes and placing explosives in each hole. By limiting the amount of explosives in each hole, the blasting contractor can limit the total energy released at any single time, which in turn can reduce noise and vibration levels. Rock drilling generates impulsive noise from the striking of the hammer with the anvil within the drill body, which drives the drill bit into the rock. Rock drilling generates noise levels of approximately 81 dB Lmax (maximum sound level during the measurement interval) at a distance of 50 feet (FHWA 2006). Given a typical work cycle, this would equate to 74 dBA Leq at 50 feet. At a distance of 400 feet, consistent with the distance blast-to-receptor distance value, the drill noise would be 56 dBA Leq over an 8-hour period and thus compliant with the City’s construction noise limit. Long-Term Operational Off-Site Traffic Noise Exposure Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed project would result in the creation of additional vehicle trips on local arterial roadways (i.e., Espola Road), which could result in increased traffic noise levels at adjacent noise-sensitive land uses. Appendix C, Traffic Noise Modeling Input and Output, contains a spreadsheet with traffic volume data (average daily traffic) for Espola Road. In particular, the proposed project would create additional traffic along Espola Road, which according to the Traffic Impact Assessment prepared for the proposed project (LOS Engineering Inc. 2019) would add 2938 total average daily trips to adjacent to the project site. According to Caltrans, a three-dBA change in sound is the beginning at which humans generally notice a barely perceptible change in sound, a five-dBA change is generally readily perceptible, and a 10-dBA increase is perceived by most people as a doubling of the existing noise level (Caltrans 2013a). Due to the existing and proposed urban setting of the project area, a readily perceptible change in noise (five dBA) would be the appropriate threshold to determine significant increases in traffic noise. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 26 February 2020 Potential noise effects from vehicular traffic were assessed using the Federal Highway Administration’s Traffic Noise Model version 2.5 (FHWA 2004). Information used in the model included the roadway geometry, existing (year 2019), near-term (opening day), near-term (opening day) plus project, horizon year (2035) without project, and horizon year (2035) plus project traffic volumes and posted traffic speeds. Noise levels were modeled at representative noise-sensitive receivers ST1 through ST4, as shown in Figure 3. The receivers were modeled to be 5 feet above the local ground elevation. The noise model results are summarized in Table 13. Based on results of the model, implementation of the proposed project would not result in readily perceptible increases in traffic noise. Table 13. Traffic Noise Modeling Results Modeled Receiver No. Existing (2019) Noise Level (dBA CNEL) Near-Term (Opening Day) without Project Noise Level (dBA CNEL) Near-Term (Opening Day) with Project Noise Level (dBA CNEL) Horizon Year (2035) without Project Noise Level (dBA CNEL) Horizon Year (2035) with Project Noise Level (dBA CNEL) Maximum Project- Related Noise Level Increase (dB) ST1 65.7 65.9 66.2 66.9 67.1 0.3 ST2 41.0 41.1 44.1 41.4 44.3 3.0 ST3 52.5 52.6 52.7 52.8 52.8 0.1 ST4 47.8 48.0 50.1 48.3 50.2 2.1 Source: Appendix H. Notes: dBA = A-weighted decibel; CNEL = community noise equivalent level; dB = decibel. Table 13 shows that at all four listed representative receivers, the addition of proposed project traffic to the roadway network would result in an increase in the CNEL of less than 3 dB, which is below the discernible level of change for the average healthy human ear. Thus, a less-than-significant impact is expected for proposed project-related off-site traffic noise increases affecting existing residences in the vicinity. On-site Traffic Interior Noise Exposure The City and the state require that interior noise levels not exceed a CNEL of 45 dB within residences. Typically, with the windows open, building shells provide approximately 15 dB of noise reduction; with windows closed, residential construction generally provides a minimum of 25 dB attenuation. Therefore, rooms exposed to an exterior CNEL not greater than 60 dB would result in an interior CNEL of 45 dB or less even with windows open. But when exterior CNEL values range from 60-70 dBA, the windows would need to be closed and thus require that the occupied structure feature mechanical ventilation for interior comfort. The future exterior noise levels in Table 14 are calculated at modeled positions M1, M2, and M3 on Figure 3 corresponding with the facades of three sample proposed new homes on southern-most “Cottage” lots parallel with Espola Road. Consequently, interior noise levels within these future residences on the proposed project site would be expected to achieve compliance with the interior noise criterion of 45 dBA CNEL by employing standard residential construction techniques and materials. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 27 February 2020 Table 14. Future Ambient Noise Levels at Residential Facades Receptor Location Noise Source Distance from Roadway CNEL Backyard, Espola Road West Espola Road 150 feet 59 Backyard, Espola Road Center Espola Road 150 feet 59 Backyard, Espola Road East Espola Road/Private Street “A” 150 feet 59 Traffic noise results displayed in Table 14 indicate that future traffic noise exposure levels at the closest building facades would all be well under the maximum exterior noise level for single-family residences (70 CNEL dBA) within the Specific Plan area and would also result in an interior CNEL of 45 dB or less, even with the windows open (i.e., 59 dBA CNEL minus 15 dBA = 44 dBA CNEL). Therefore, future roadway traffic noise levels at residences would be less than significant. Stationary Noise Sources The proposed project’s development would result in 160 new single-family homes and a mix of open space and recreational uses (see Figure 2) that would add a variety of noise-producing mechanical equipment (discussed below). Most of the noise-producing equipment would be considered stationary, or limited in mobility to a defined area. Additionally, the open space and recreational uses would attract participants and their guests (or in some situations, such activities would be open to the public) to enjoy proposed project facilities and thus create potential community noise relating to added aggregate speech and music (both acoustic and amplified) as appropriate or expected for the venue. The Club Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Club is anticipated to feature a family swimming pool, yoga pavilion, locker rooms, and outdoor tennis and pickle ball courts. These facilities suggest regular, continuous operation of pool filtration pumps and air-conditioning units for the occupied interior spaces that should be no closer than 150 feet to the nearest existing noise-sensitive residential property to the west. At this distance, the combined noise level of a typical operating pump (assume source level of 80 dBA Leq at three feet [Bies and Hansen 1996]) and a commercial rooftop condenser unit (source level of 74 dBA at three feet [Johnson Controls 2010]) would be 47 dBA Leq, which translates to 54 dBA CNEL (assuming continuous operation of equipment through nighttime hours, to keep the pool clean and the Club interior climate- controlled) and thus less than the 60 dBA CNEL standard at the exterior boundaries of the project area. Residents and their guests enjoying the outdoor pool and ball courts during daytime hours would likely raise their voices while doing so. For purposes of this analysis, up to 100 participants (44 at the ball courts, and another 56 in or at the pool area) with individual speech levels of 66 dBA at three feet (Hayne et al. 2006) recreating outdoors at an average distance of 150 feet from the nearest noise-sensitive receptor to the west would result in an aggregate hourly sound level of 52 dBA Leq, which translates to 52 dBA CNEL (assuming no operation during nighttime hours) and thus less than the 60 dBA CNEL standard at the exterior boundaries of the project area. Anticipated noise due to pickle ball play from a single court is estimated to be 54 dBA Leq at a distance of 80 feet, based on prior Dudek project experience and generally consistent with measurement data from publicly available sources (Spendiarian and Willis 2012). Assuming up to eight pickle ball courts, on NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 28 February 2020 average, would experience concurrent play from residents, guests, and visitors, the predicted noise exposure at the nearest existing residential receiver to the west (at a distance of 150 feet, representing the average distance if pickle ball play was considered as a single-point source) would be 55 dBA, which translates to 55 dBA CNEL (assuming no play during nighttime hours) and thus less than the 60 dBA CNEL standard at the exterior boundaries of the project area. In aggregate, sound from these three sources (operation of mechanical equipment, speech from Club attendance, and pickle ball play) would logarithmically combine into an hourly level of 57 dBA Leq, which translates into 58 dBA CNEL and thus less than the 60 dBA CNEL standard at the western boundary adjoining offsite residences. The Butterfly Farm Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Butterfly Farm is expected to include a butterfly vivarium, greenhouse, classroom, and associated office/maintenance support space. These facilities would involve ventilation and air-conditioning units that should be no closer than 350 feet to the nearest existing noise-sensitive residential property to the east. At this distance, the combined noise level of a typical axial-flow “box”-type ventilation fan (84 dBA Leq at three feet, calculated from 22,575 cubic feet per minute [cfm] [Farmtek 2019]) and a commercial rooftop condenser unit (source level of 74 dBA at three feet [Johnson Controls 2010]) would be 43 dBA Leq, which translates to 50 dBA CNEL (assuming 24-hour operation as a worst- case) and thus less than the 60 dBA CNEL standard at the exterior boundaries of the project area. Hence, noise impact from operation of these equipment serving the facilities at the Butterfly Farm would be considered less than significant. Residents and their guests enjoying the outdoor garden and picnic area during daytime hours would likely raise their voices while doing so. For purposes of this analysis, up to 50 participants with individual speech levels of 66 dBA at three feet (Hayne 2006) recreating outdoors at an average distance of 400 feet from the nearest noise- sensitive receptor to the east would result in an aggregate hourly sound level of 38 dBA Leq, which translates to 40 dBA CNEL (assuming no operation during nighttime hours) and thus less than the 60 dBA CNEL standard at the exterior boundaries of the project area. Hence, noise impact attributed to residents and guests enjoying the facilities at the Butterfly Farm would be considered less than significant. The Barn and The Social Less-Than-Significant Impact with Mitigation. The Event Barn and the “The Social” café—included in The Barn component of the proposed project—would be located northeast of the proposed project entrance across from Martincoit Road. These locations would be used as venues for weekday and weekend weddings, farmer’s markets, concerts, fairs, and other hosted private and public gatherings. The two detached structures would be expected to feature HVAC systems (to provide ventilation and air-conditioning for interior spaces) functionally similar to those assumed for the Butterfly Farm. However, the nearest existing residential receptor to this operating equipment would likely be south of Espola Road, approximately 200 feet away. At this distance, the estimated aggregate HVAC equipment noise level would be 48 dBA Leq, which translates to 55 dBA CNEL (assuming 24-hour operation as a worst-case) and thus less than the 60 dBA CNEL standard at the exterior boundaries of the project area. Hence, noise impact from operation of these equipment serving the facilities at The Event Barn and The Social would be less than significant. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 29 February 2020 According to the Specific Plan, the hosted events would not normally last beyond 10 p.m., and any that do would require a Special Use Permit per 3.2.3.B of the Specific Plan Additional Open Space Standards (SMA Ventures LLC 2019). The number of participants at hosted events could be as high as 300, and this analysis assumes that individual average speech levels of up to 66 dBA at three feet (Hayne 2006) could occur. To help illustrate a sample outdoor event noise scenario, Appendix D shows the predicted noise propagation out to the community from the following assumed sound sources and sound-blocking features:  Two (2) pole-mounted outdoor speaker systems, each six (6) feet in height above grade, are positioned at the southwest and southeast corners of The Barn and each emit an average sound level of up to 100 dBA Leq at a distance of approximately 10 feet, comparable to an amplified guitar (on stage with the performer using ear monitors [Darling n.d.]).  An attendance of 300, with individual speech level at 66 dBA Leq at three feet each, is distributed south of the buildings’ southern facades and over the event lawn north of the proposed curved Event Barn Lawn wall.  The Event Barn Lawn wall, a stone barrier topped with glass panels and having an extent shown in the Specific Plan, is assumed to be eight feet in height above grade. Under these assumed conditions, predicted dominant noise from the pair of speakers operating during a “regular event” (per 3.2.3.B of the Specific Plan Additional Open Space Standards) would cause sound levels at the nearest noise-sensitive receptor (an existing residential property on the south side of Espola Road, just 180 feet away from the Event Barn Lawn wall) to reach up to 69 dBA hourly Leq. At this estimated sound level, a regular 3-hour event could transpire during the allowable daytime hours (9 a.m. to 3 p.m. on any weekday [except holidays]) and still result in a CNEL value compliant with the 60 dBA CNEL standard and thus represent a less-than-significant noise impact to the community. If the 3-hour event were to occur during evening hours (i.e., between 7 p.m. and 10 p.m.), the resulting CNEL at the same existing offsite receptor would be 65 dBA CNEL and thus need a 5 dB reduction at each of the two speakers in order to comply with the 60 dBA CNEL offsite standard. At the nearest proposed on-site residential lot to the west of the Barn, approximately 120 feet away, the sound exposure from the 3-hour regular event during daytime hours would be as high as 74 dBA hourly Leq at a second-story listener position—a receptor location, such as a bedroom window, at the end of a direct sound path that may not be occluded by the Barn wall. At this magnitude during daytime hours, the resulting CNEL value would be 65 dBA; and, for an evening event, the CNEL would be 60 dBA. Both of these predicted on-site residential façade levels are compliant with the 70 dBA CNEL limit per the Specific Plan. During “special events” (per 3.2.3.B of the Specific Plan Additional Open Space Standards) requiring a temporary permit that could occur during nighttime hours and/or last for more than 3 hours duration, the same two speakers (at 100 dBA at 10’ each) and speech from 50-300 guests would risk exceeding the offsite receptor standard of 60 dBA CNEL and require mitigation. For example, a 3-hour special event hosted between 10 p.m. and 1 a.m. would result in 70 dBA CNEL at the nearest existing residence south of Espola Road; thus, compliance during such nighttime hours would require that the two speakers have their amplified sound levels reduced by 10 dBA each. At the resulting 90 dBA at 10’ per speaker, the scale and type of event would likely need to be different: 100 dBA at 10’ would be consistent with an amplified guitar, but 90 dBA at 10’ would be compatible with live, unamplified vocalists or a playing classical instruments (e.g., four-piece band). Given such considerations, a variety of special event possibilities could NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 30 February 2020 risk exceeding the 60 dBA CNEL offsite standard and/or the on-site residential outdoor limit of 70 dBA CNEL and thus result in a potentially significant impact requiring mitigation measure MM-NOI-3. The Meadow Less-Than-Significant Impact with Mitigation. According to the Specific Plan, outdoor concerts may be performed at The Meadow area, which is bounded by a planned on-site slope and open space to the north, Private Street “D” to the south, Private Street “A” to the west, and new residential lots to the east. Similar to the sample event modeled for the Barn and Social venue, Appendix D shows the predicted noise propagation out to the community from the following assumed sound sources and sound-blocking features:  Two (2) pole-mounted outdoor speaker systems, each six (6) feet in height above grade, are positioned at the southwest and southeast corners of The Barn and each emit an average sound level of up to 94 dBA Leq at a distance of approximately 10 feet, comparable to an amplified guitar (on stage with the performer using ear monitors [Darling n.d.]).  An attendance of 300, with individual speech level at 66 dBA Leq at three feet each, is distributed south of the buildings’ southern facades and over the event lawn north of the proposed curved Event Barn Lawn wall.  The Event Barn Lawn wall, a stone barrier topped with glass panels and having an extent shown in the Specific Plan, is assumed to be eight feet in height above grade. Under these assumed conditions, predicted dominant noise from the pair of speakers operating during a “regular event” would cause sound levels at the nearest noise-sensitive receptor (an existing residential property 100 feet south of the Meadow beyond Private Street “D”) to attain 64 dBA Leq. At this estimated sound level, a regular event could transpire for up to three hours during the daytime period and result in a CNEL value of 55 dBA. A similar regular event during evening hours would yield a CNEL value of 60 dBA. Both CNEL values would be compliant with the 60 dBA CNEL standard at the exterior boundaries of the project area and thus represent a less-than-significant noise impact to the neighboring offsite community. At the nearest proposed on-site residential lot easterly adjacent to the Meadow, the sound exposure from the event would be as high as 72 dBA Leq at a second-story listener position. At this magnitude, the same regular event during daytime hours would be 63 dBA CNEL. In the evening, a comparable 3-hour event would yield 68 dBA CNEL at the same second-story receptor. Both values are less than 70 dBA CNEL limit per the Specific Plan for on-site residential use boundaries. During “special events” (per 3.2.3.B of the Specific Plan Additional Open Space Standards), the aggregate sound from live or amplified music from a well-attended event at the Meadow venue could occur during nighttime hours. Using the same sample event scenario conditions as described for regular events, a 3- hour special event at night would not meet the 60 dBA CNEL off-site threshold at the edge of existing residential land use 100 feet south of the Meadow. By way of example, the CNEL at the nearest offsite residence would be 65 dBA and thus require at least 5 dB of sound reduction at each of the two speakers. Given such considerations, a variety of special event possibilities could risk exceeding the 60 dBA CNEL offsite standard and/or the on-site residential outdoor limit of 70 dBA CNEL and thus result in a potentially significant impact requiring mitigation measure MM-NOI-4. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 31 February 2020 Agri-Fields (The Working Farm) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Working Farm would be expected to involve typical agricultural equipment operating as close as 60 feet to adjacent residential property. At this distance, noise levels could range from 55 dBA Lmax for a pickup truck and up to 84 dBA Lmax for a tractor (FHWA 2006). However, Section 8.08.170.E from the City’s noise ordinance exempts agricultural operations so long as they occur during daytime hours (7 a.m. to 7 p.m.) or are performed for crop protection (City of Poway 2019). But to yield noise exposure levels at the adjoining offsite residential properties that meet the Specific Plan’s exterior project area property line standard of 60 dBA CNEL, hours of operation for the noisiest on-site expected equipment would need to be limited. By way of example, a tractor could operate for up to 2 hours (during the aforementioned allowable daytime period) at an average working distance of no less than 150 feet from a receptor point along the exterior project area property line and result in a noise level less than 60 dBA CNEL. Quieter equipment, such as a flatbed truck (Lmax = 74 dBA at 50 feet), could operate for all twelve daytime hours at this same average working distance and yield a noise level compliant with this adopted standard. The Dog Park The Dog Park is a designated area southwest of the Meadow and approximately 150 feet north of the nearest offsite existing residence abutting Cloudcroft Court. Assuming up to four dogs may be barking (each bark considered comparable to 100 dBA Lmax at one meter [Helmut 2019]) intermittently (no more than twelve barks each per hour) during a typical daytime hour when the area would be available for usage, at this distance of 150 feet to the Specific Plan boundary the estimated CNEL would be less than 45 dBA and thus compliant with the offsite residential property line standard. The Tot Lot The Tot Lot is a designated area north of the Butterfly Farm and approximately 150 feet south-southeast of the nearest offsite existing residence abutting St. Andrews Drive. Assuming up to eight (8) children may be yelling during excited play (each yell considered comparable to a human shout [90 dBA Lmax at three feet, per Hayne 2006]) intermittently (no more than twelve shouts each per hour) during a typical daytime hour when the area would be available for usage, at this distance of 150 feet to the Specific Plan boundary the estimated CNEL would be less than 40 dBA and thus compliant with the offsite residential property line standard. For two on-site future residential “Cottage” lots that adjoin the Tot Lot to the southwest, the playing children would be much closer—potentially 50 feet, on average. At this time-averaged distance, the yelling children would result in a noise level of 48 dBA CNEL and thus be compliant with the Specific Plan performance standard of 70 dBA CNEL. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 32 February 2020 New Residential Homes Less-Than-Significant Impact. For purposes of this analysis, each of the 160 new single-family homes would be expected to feature an air-conditioning unit having operation noise comparable to 60 dBA at twenty feet (Berger et al 2015). Assuming these units are installed at grade and near a façade of the residence, they should be no closer than 50 feet to the nearest existing residential property and would thus be expected to yield—as a worst- case—a property line noise level of 52 dBA Leq continuously throughout the day and night during hot summer conditions. At this hourly level, the corresponding CNEL value would be 59 dBA and less than the Specific Plan’s 60 dBA CNEL standard at the exterior boundaries of the project area. Therefore, operation of residential air- conditioning units would result in potential noise impacts considered less than significant. b) Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Construction activities may expose persons to excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise, causing a potentially significant impact. Caltrans has collected groundborne vibration information related to construction activities (Caltrans 2013b). Information from Caltrans indicates that continuous vibrations with a PPV of approximately 0.2 ips is considered “annoying.” For context, heavier pieces of construction equipment, such as a bulldozer that may be expected on the project site, have peak particle velocities of approximately 0.089 ips or less at a reference distance of 25 feet (DOT 2006). Groundborne vibration attenuates rapidly—even over short distances. And when groundborne vibration encounters a building foundation, a coupling loss occurs depending on the mass and design. For typical wood-framed houses, like those near the proposed project, this coupling loss is 5 vibration velocity decibels according to FTA guidance (FTA 2006). The attenuation of groundborne vibration as it propagates from source to receptor through intervening soils and rock strata can be estimated with expressions found in FTA and Caltrans guidance. By way of example, for a bulldozer operating on site and as close as the western project boundary (that is 15 feet from the nearest receiving sensitive land use) the estimated vibration velocity level would be 0.19 ips and thus no greater than the annoyance threshold recommended by Caltrans. Therefore, vibration-induced annoyance to occupants of nearby existing homes would be less than significant. Construction vibration, at sufficiently high levels, can also present a building damage risk. However, anticipated construction vibration from conventional heavy equipment associated with this proposed project would not yield levels that surpass this risk. Per Caltrans, the recommended PPV threshold for newer residential structures is 0.5 ips and 0.3 ips for older residential structures—both of which are less stringent that the aforementioned threshold to annoy occupants of such structures; thus vibration damage risk to nearby structures is considered less than significant. For blasting events associated with project construction, Caltrans offers different “transient event” guidance: 0.5 ips PPV for “repeated” blasts where the class of receiving structure would be comparable to “relatively old residential structures in poor condition” (Caltrans 2013b). Detonation of an 18.5-pound, heavily confined per- delay charge would be predicted to result in a groundborne vibration velocity level of 0.5 ips PPV at a residential receptor no closer than 400 feet away. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 33 February 2020 Once operational, the proposed project would not be expected to feature major producers of groundborne vibration. Anticipated mechanical systems like heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning units are designed and manufactured to feature rotating (fans, motors) and reciprocating (compressors) components that are well-balanced with isolated vibration within or external to the equipment casings. On this basis, vibration due to proposed project operation should be less than significant. C. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Less-Than-Significant Impact. There are no private airstrips within the vicinity of the project site. The closest airport to the proposed project site is the Ramona Municipal Airport, approximately 6.25 miles northeast of the site and would therefore not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. Impacts would be less than significant. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 34 February 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 11872 35 February 2020 6 Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures would be implemented to reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant. MM-NOI-1 Prior to the issuance of a Construction Permit, the project applicant/owner or construction contractor shall prepare and submit to the City of Poway Planning Division for its review and approval a Construction Noise Management Plan (CNMP). Prior to the issuance of a Construction Permit, construction plans shall also include a note indicating compliance with the CNMP is required. The CNMP shall be prepared or reviewed by a qualified acoustician (retained at the project applicant/owner or construction contractor’s expense) and feature the following: 1) A detailed construction schedule, at daily (or weekly, if activities during each day of the week are typical) resolution and correlating to areas or zones of on-site project construction activities and the anticipated equipment types and quantities involved. Information shall include expected hours of actual operation per day for each type of equipment per phase and indication of anticipated concurrent construction activities on site. 2) Suggested locations of a set of noise-level monitors, attended by a qualified acoustician or another party under his/her supervision or direction, at which sample outdoor ambient noise levels will be measured and collected over a sufficient sample period and subsequently analyzed (i.e., compared with applicable time-dependent A-weighted decibel [dBA] thresholds) to ascertain compliance with the eight-hour City of Poway threshold of 75 dBA equivalent noise level over a consecutive eight-hour period. Sampling shall be performed, at a minimum, on the first (or otherwise considered typical construction operations) day of each distinct construction phase (e.g., each of the five listed phases in Table 2, Construction Phase Distance to Nearest Pre- Existing Noise-Sensitive Receptors). 3) If sample collected noise level data indicates that the eight-hour noise threshold has or will be exceeded, construction work shall be suspended (for the activity or phase of concern) and the project applicant/owner or construction contractor shall implement one or more of the following measures as detailed or specified in the CNMP: a) Administrative controls (e.g., reduce operating time of equipment and/or prohibit usage of equipment type[s] within certain distances). b) Engineering controls (upgrade noise controls, such as install better engine exhaust mufflers). c) Install noise abatement on the project site boundary fencing (or within the project site, as practical and appropriate) in the form of sound blankets or comparable temporary barriers to occlude construction noise emission between the project site (or specific equipment operation as the situation may define) and the noise-sensitive receptor(s) of concern. The implemented measure(s) shall be reviewed or otherwise inspected and approved by the qualified acoustician (or another party under his/her supervision or direction) prior to resumption of the construction activity or process that caused the measured noise concern or need for noise mitigation. Noise levels shall be re-measured, after installation of said measures, to ascertain post-mitigation compliance with the noise threshold. As needed, this process shall be repeated and refined until noise level compliance is demonstrated and NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 36 February 2020 documented. A report of this implemented mitigation and its documented success shall be provided to the City of Poway Planning Division. 4) The project applicant/owner or construction contractor shall make available a telephone hotline so that concerned neighbors in the community may call to report noise complaints. The CNMP shall include a process to investigate these complaints and, if determined to be valid, detail efforts to provide a timely resolution and response to the complainant—with copy of resolution provided to the City of Poway Planning Division. MM-NOI-2 The project applicant/owner or its construction contractor(s) shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, a blasting/drilling monitoring plan. The plan shall be site specific, based on general and exact locations of required blasting and the results of a project-specific geotechnical investigation. The blasting plan will include a description of the planned blasting methods, an inventory of receptors potentially affected by the planned blasting, and calculations to determine the area affected by the planned blasting that include estimates of the pre-blast drill noise levels, air-blast overpressure sound levels, and groundborne vibration levels at each residence within 500 feet of a blasting location. Where potential exceedances of relevant noise and vibration exposure limits are identified, the blasting/drilling monitoring plan shall identify mitigation measures shown to effectively reduce noise and vibration levels (e.g., altering orientation of blast progression, increased delay between charge detonations, pre-splitting) to be implemented in order to demonstrate compliance with these thresholds. Additionally, all project phases involving blasting shall conform to the following requirements: 1. All blasting shall be performed by a blast contractor and blasting personnel licensed to operate per appropriate regulatory agencies. 2. Prior to blasting, a qualified geotechnical professional shall inspect and document the existing conditions of facades and other visible structural features or elements of the nearest residential buildings. Should this inspector determine that some structural features or elements appear fragile or otherwise potentially sensitive to vibration damage caused by the anticipated blasting activity, the maximum per-delay charge weights and other related blast parameters shall be re-evaluated to establish appropriate quantified limits. 3. Each blast shall be monitored and recorded with an air-blast overpressure monitor and groundborne vibration accelerometer that is located outside the closest residence to the blast. This data shall be recorded, and a post-blast summary report shall be prepared and be available for public review or distribution as necessary. 4. Blasting shall not exceed 0.5 ips PPV at the nearest occupied residence, in accordance with California Department of Transportation guidance (Caltrans 2013b). 5. To ensure that potentially impacted residents are informed, the applicant will provide notice by mail to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the project at least one (1) week prior to a scheduled blasting event. 6. Pre-blast drilling operations associated with blasting preparations shall be performed in a manner consistent with adherence to City of Poway regulations and guidance. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 37 February 2020 MM-NOI-3 Operation of any “regular event” at The Event Barn (and The Social) as defined by 3.2.3.B of The Farm in Poway Specific Plan Additional Open Space Standards shall conform to the following acoustical conditions: 1) Daytime (within 8 a.m. to 7 p.m.) a) Attendance shall not exceed 300 and include residents, guests, visitors, and any on-site support staff that host the event in progress. b) Event duration shall not exceed a cumulative total of three hours. c) The aggregate sound level from live (acoustic) or amplified music shall not exceed a total of 103 A-weighted decibel (dBA) at a distance of 10 feet. If speakers are positioned to distribute the amplified sound, they must be positioned in such a manner that The Event Barn Wall provides linear occlusion between the speaker and the nearest existing residential receptors south of Espola Road. d) If any proposed event parameters above are not listed or may exceed the indicated constraints, then a qualified acoustician shall prepare or review a predictive sound propagation analysis prior to the proposed event in order to identify need for recommended noise control or sound abatement implantation measures that could include (but not be limited to): i. Via the pre-installed house audio-visual (A/V) system or on A/V hardware supplied by the hosted event performers, set electronic controls on amplified sound levels to comply with recommended front-of-stage and/or property line expectations. ii. Install temporary noise walls, curtains, or other barrier forms so as to improve containment and absorption of sound within The Event Barn Lawn venue space and minimize spill-over noise to the property line and community beyond. iii. Install on-site sound level measurement systems (e.g., akin to NTiAudio or comparable supplier technology) to monitor event sound levels in real-time and provide alerts to event hosts and administrators. Collected data and alerts offer opportunity to provide feedback to event performers as part of implementing administrative control of sound emission levels. Collected data from 1.d.iii can also provide documentation that an event was fully compliant with required sound limits at the property line(s), and might be used to support assertions that future events having identical conditions (e.g., an annual seasonal festival) would also be compliant and thus waive the need for additional monitoring (at the discretion or approval of the City of Poway). 2) Evening (7 p.m. to 10 p.m.) a) Attendance shall not exceed 300 and include residents, guests, visitors, and any on-site support staff that host the event in progress. b) Event duration shall not exceed a cumulative total of three hours. c) The aggregate sound level from live (acoustic) or amplified music shall not exceed a total of 98 dBA at a distance of 10 feet. If speakers are positioned to distribute the amplified sound, they must be positioned in such a manner that The Event Barn Wall provides linear occlusion between the speaker and the nearest existing residential receptors south of Espola Road. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 38 February 2020 d) If any proposed event parameters above are not listed or may exceed the indicated constraints, then a qualified acoustician shall prepare or review a predictive sound propagation analysis prior to the proposed event in order to identify need for recommended noise control or sound abatement implantation measures that could include (but not be limited to): i. Via the pre-installed house A/V system or on A/V hardware supplied by the hosted event performers, set electronic controls on amplified sound levels to comply with recommended front-of-stage and/or property line expectations. ii. Install temporary noise walls, curtains, or other barrier forms so as to improve containment and absorption of sound within The Event Barn Lawn venue space and minimize spill-over noise to the property line and community beyond. iii. Install on-site sound level measurement systems (e.g., akin to NTiAudio or comparable supplier technology) to monitor event sound levels in real-time and provide alerts to event hosts and administrators. Collected data from 2.d.iii can also provide documentation that an event was fully compliant with required sound limits at the property line(s), and might be used to support assertions that future events having identical conditions (e.g., an annual seasonal festival) would also be compliant and thus waive the need for additional monitoring (at the discretion or approval of the City of Poway). Conduct of a “special event” (i.e., that is not considered a “regular event”) at The Event Barn (and The Social) as defined by 3.2.3.B of The Farm in Poway Specific Plan Additional Open Space Standards shall require a City-approved Temporary Use Permit. At the City’s discretion, the Temporary Use Permit application may require the approval of a predictive sound propagation analysis prepared by a qualified acoustician to identify recommended noise control and sound abatement implementation measures that—as implemented properly by the permit applicant— would be expected to result in event-attributed noise levels that are compliant with the Farm in Poway Specific Plan Additional Open Space Standards as follows: 1) No greater than 60 dBA CNEL at the property lines of existing residential receptors adjoining the Specific Plan area; and, 2) No greater than 70 dBA CNEL at the property lines of on-site residential receptors within the Specific Plan area. MM-NOI-4 Operation of any “regular event” at The Meadow (Amphitheater) as defined by 3.2.3.B of The Farm in Poway Specific Plan Additional Open Space Standards shall conform to the following acoustical conditions: 1) Daytime (within 8 a.m. to 7 p.m.) a) Attendance shall not exceed 300 and include residents, guests, visitors, and any on-site support staff that host the event in progress. b) Event duration shall not exceed a cumulative total of three hours. c) The aggregate sound level from live (acoustic) or amplified music shall not exceed a total of 97 A-weighted decibel (dBA) at a distance of 10 feet. If speakers are positioned to distribute the amplified sound, they must be positioned in such a manner that The Event Barn Wall NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 39 February 2020 provides linear occlusion between the speaker and the nearest existing residential receptors south of Espola Road. d) If any proposed event parameters above are not listed or may exceed the indicated constraints, then a qualified acoustician shall prepare or review a predictive sound propagation analysis prior to the proposed event in order to identify need for recommended noise control or sound abatement implantation measures that could include (but not be limited to): i. Via the pre-installed house audio-visual (A/V) system or on A/V hardware supplied by the hosted event performers, set electronic controls on amplified sound levels to comply with recommended front-of-stage and/or property line expectations. ii. Install temporary noise walls, curtains, or other barrier forms so as to improve containment and absorption of sound within The Event Barn Lawn venue space and minimize spill-over noise to the property line and community beyond. iii. Install on-site sound level measurement systems (e.g., akin to NTiAudio or comparable supplier technology) to monitor event sound levels in real-time and provide alerts to event hosts and administrators. Collected data and alerts offer opportunity to provide feedback to event performers as part of implementing administrative control of sound emission levels. Collected data from 1.d.iii can also provide documentation that an event was fully compliant with required sound limits at the property line(s), and might be used to support assertions that future events having identical conditions (e.g., an annual seasonal festival) would also be compliant and thus waive the need for additional monitoring (at the discretion or approval of the City of Poway). 2) Evening (7 p.m. to 10 p.m.) a) Attendance shall not exceed 300 and include residents, guests, visitors, and any on-site support staff that host the event in progress. b) Event duration shall not exceed a cumulative total of three hours. c) The aggregate sound level from live (acoustic) or amplified music shall not exceed a total of 92 dBA at a distance of 10 feet. If speakers are positioned to distribute the amplified sound, they must be positioned in such a manner that The Event Barn Wall provides linear occlusion between the speaker and the nearest existing residential receptors south of Espola Road. d) If any proposed event parameters above are not listed or may exceed the indicated constraints, then a qualified acoustician shall prepare or review a predictive sound propagation analysis prior to the proposed event in order to identify need for recommended noise control or sound abatement implantation measures that could include (but not be limited to): i. Via the pre-installed house A/V system or on A/V hardware supplied by the hosted event performers, set electronic controls on amplified sound levels to comply with recommended front-of-stage and/or property line expectations. ii. Install temporary noise walls, curtains, or other barrier forms so as to improve containment and absorption of sound within The Event Barn Lawn venue space and minimize spill-over noise to the property line and community beyond. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 40 February 2020 iii. Install on-site sound level measurement systems (e.g., akin to NTiAudio or comparable supplier technology) to monitor event sound levels in real-time and provide alerts to event hosts and administrators. Collected data from 2.d.iii can also provide documentation that an event was fully compliant with required sound limits at the property line(s), and might be used to support assertions that future events having identical conditions (e.g., an annual seasonal festival) would also be compliant and thus waive the need for additional monitoring (at the discretion or approval of the City of Poway). Conduct of a “special event” (i.e., that is not considered a “regular event”) at The Meadow as defined by 3.2.3.B of The Farm in Poway Specific Plan Additional Open Space Standards shall require a City-approved Temporary Use Permit. At the City’s discretion, the Temporary Use Permit application may require the approval of a predictive sound propagation analysis prepared by a qualified acoustician to identify recommended noise control and sound abatement implementation measures that—as implemented properly by the permit applicant— would be expected to result in event-attributed noise levels that are compliant with The Farm in Poway Specific Plan Additional Open Space Standards as follows: 1) No greater than 60 dBA CNEL at the property lines of existing residential receptors adjoining the Specific Plan area; and, 2) No greater than 70 dBA CNEL at the property lines of on-site residential receptors within the Specific Plan area. 11872 41 February 2020 7 Summary of Findings This noise report was conducted for the proposed project. The results indicate that potential impacts during construction would be less than significant with mitigation. Noise impacts due to operation of the proposed project (including traffic noise) would be less than significant. For some regular and special events hosted at the venue associated with The Barn and The Social facilities, potential noise impacts could arise but would be mitigated to a less than significant level. No further mitigation beyond what has been described herein is anticipated at this time. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 42 February 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 11872 43 February 2020 8 References Cited Bies, D., and Hansen, C. 1996. Engineering Noise Control. 2nd edition. Berger, E., Neitzel, R., and Kladden, C. (Berger et al). 2015. Noise NavigatorTM Sound Level Database with Over 1700 Measurement Values. E-A-R 88-34/HP, version 1.8. June 26. Caltrans (California Department of Transportation). 2013a. Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. September 2013. Caltrans. 2013b. Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual. Division of Environmental Analysis, Environmental Engineering, Hazardous Waste, Air, Noise, Paleontology Office. Sacramento, California. September 2013. City of Poway. 2019. Poway Municipal Code Darling, David. (unknown date) Decibel levels of musical instruments. Accessed April 28, 2019 at http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia_of_music/D/decibel.html DOT (U.S. Department of Transportation). 2006. Dyno Nobel. 2010. Blasting and Explosives Quick Reference Guide. https://www.leg.state.mn.us/docs/2015/other/150681/PFEISref_1/Dyno%20Nobel%202010.pdf Farmtek. 2019. https://www.farmtek.com/farm/supplies/prod1;ft_ag_growing_supplies- ft_greenhouse_equipment-ft_greenhouse_fans;pg105530_116193.html Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2008. Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM), Software Version 1.1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Environmental Measurement and Modeling Division. Washington, D.C. December 8 FHWA. 2006. Roadway Construction Noise Model: User’s Guide. Final Report. FHWA-HEP-06-015. DOT-VNTSC- FHWA-06-02. Cambridge, Massachusetts: DOT, Research and Innovative Technology Administration. Final Report. August. FHWA. 2004. FHWA Traffic Noise Model Version 2.5. FTA (Federal Transit Administration). 2006. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Final Report. FTA-VA- 90-1003-06. May. Hayne, M.J., R.H. Rumble, and D.J. Mee. 2006. “Prediction of Crowd Noise.” Proceedings of ACOUSTICS 2006, Christchurch, New Zealand, November 20–22, 2006. Accessed March 29, 2019. https://www.acoustics.asn.au/conference_proceedings/AASNZ2006/papers/p46.pdf. Helmut. 2019. How to Block Barking Dog Noise. https://noisyworld.org/how-to-block-barking-dog-noise/ Johnson Controls. 2010. 561927-YTG-A-0410. Technical Guide – Affinity Split-System Heat Pumps. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE FARM IN POWAY PROJECT 11872 44 February 2020 OPR (Governor’s Office of Planning and Research). 2017. State of California 2017 General Plan Guidelines. Accessed May 10, 2019. http://www.opr.ca.gov/docs/OPR_COMPLETE_7.31.17.pdf. OPR. 2003. State of California General Plan Guidelines. October 2003. SMA Ventures LLC. 2019. The Farm in Poway Public Draft Specific Plan No. 1. January 2020. Spendiarian and Willis (Spendiarian and Willis Acoustics and Noise Control LLC). 2012. Noise Survey: Proposed Pickleball Courts Iron Oaks at Sun Lakes. Prepared for Sun Lakes HOA No. 3. September 7, 2012. http://ironoakstennis.net/Documents/NoiseTesting.pdf. Appendix A Noise Measurement Field Data Field Noise Measurement Data Record: 1148 Project Name The Farms Observer(s)Connor Burke Date 2019-06-11 Meteorological Conditions Temp (F)87 Humidity % (R.H.)43 Wind Light Wind Speed (MPH)8 Wind Direction South West Sky Sunny Instrument and Calibrator Information Instrument Name List (ENC) Rion NL-52 Instrument Name (ENC) Rion NL-52 Instrument Name Lookup Key (ENC) Rion NL-52 Manufacturer Rion Model NL-52 Serial Number 553896 Calibrator Name (ENC) LD CAL150 Calibrator Name (ENC) LD CAL150 Calibrator Name Lookup Key (ENC) LD CAL150 Calibrator Manufacturer Larson Davis Calibrator Model LD CAL150 Calibrator Serial #5152 Pre-Test (dBA SPL)94 Post-Test (dBA SPL)94 Windscreen Yes Weighting?A-WTD Slow/Fast?Slow ANSI?Yes Monitoring Record #1 Site ID ST1 Site Location Lat/Long 33.018464, -117.039703 Begin (Time)10:20:00 End (Time)10:30:00 Leq 64.9 Lmax 75.1 Lmin 44.3 Other Lx?L90, L50, L10 L90 49.8 L50 60.3 L10 69.3 Other Lx (Specify Metric)L Primary Noise Source Traffic Other Noise Sources (Background)Birds, Distant Aircraft, Distant Traffic, Rustling Leaves Other Noise Sources Additional Description Helicopter fly by Is the same instrument and calibrator being used as previously noted? Yes Are the meteorological conditions the same as previously noted? Yes Page 1/5 Source Info and Traffic Counts Number of Lanes 2 Lane Width (feet)10 Roadway Width (feet)20 Roadway Width (m)6.1 Distance to Roadway (feet)40 Distance to Roadway (m)12.2 Distance Measured to Centerline or Edge of Pavement? Edge of Pavement Estimated Vehicle Speed (MPH)45 Traffic Counts Vehicle Count Summary A 112, MT 4, HT 0, B 0, MC 0 Select Method for Recording Count Duration Enter Manually Counting Both Directions?Yes Count Duration (minutes)10 Vehicle Count Tally Select Method for Vehicle Counts Enter Manually Number of Vehicles - Autos 112 Number of Vehicles - Medium Trucks 4 Number of Vehicles - Heavy Trucks 0 Number of Vehicles - Buses 0 Number of Vehicles - Motorcyles 0 Description / Photos Site Photos Photo Comments / Description Facing north. Page 2/5 Monitoring Record #2 Site ID ST4 Site Location Lat/Long 33.022707, -117.034781 Begin (Time)11:00:00 End (Time)11:10:00 Leq 52.5 Lmax 64.5 Lmin 36.3 Other Lx?L90, L50, L10 L90 38.8 L50 44.6 L10 56.2 Other Lx (Specify Metric)L Primary Noise Source Birds/distant aircraft Other Noise Sources (Background)Birds, Distant Aircraft, Distant Traffic, Rustling Leaves Is the same instrument and calibrator being used as previously noted? Yes Are the meteorological conditions the same as previously noted? Yes Description / Photos Site Photos Photo Comments / Description Facing east. Page 3/5 Monitoring Record #3 Site ID ST3 Site Location Lat/Long 33.032444, -117.030992 Begin (Time)11:15:00 End (Time)11:25:00 Leq 42.2 Lmax 67.5 Lmin 34.2 Other Lx?L90, L50, L10 L90 35.2 L50 37.3 L10 44.7 Other Lx (Specify Metric)L Primary Noise Source Birds Other Noise Sources (Background)Birds, Distant Aircraft, Distant Conversations / Yelling, Distant Traffic, Rustling Leaves Other Noise Sources Additional Description Distant nail gun Is the same instrument and calibrator being used as previously noted? Yes Are the meteorological conditions the same as previously noted? Yes Description / Photos Site Photos Photo Comments / Description Facing south Page 4/5 Monitoring Record #4 Site ID ST2 Site Location Lat/Long 33.026245, -117.038944 Begin (Time)11:30:00 End (Time)11:40:00 Leq 43.1 Lmax 49.9 Lmin 36.3 Other Lx?L90, L50, L10 L90 37.8 L50 41.6 L10 46.3 Other Lx (Specify Metric)L Primary Noise Source Birds Other Noise Sources (Background)Birds, Distant Traffic, Rustling Leaves Is the same instrument and calibrator being used as previously noted? Yes Are the meteorological conditions the same as previously noted? Yes Description / Photos Site Photos Photo Comments / Description Facing south. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Page 5/5 Appendix B Construction Noise Modeling Input and Output The Farm in Poway - Technical Noise Report Appendix B - Construction Noise Modeling Worksheets To User: bordered cells are inputs, unbordered cells have formulae noise level limit for construction phase, per City of Poway =75 allowable hours over which Leq is to be averaged (example: 8 for Poway, County of San Diego, or FTA guidance) = 8 Construction Phase Equipment Total Equipment Qty AUF % (from FHWA RCNM) Reference Lmax @ 50 ft. from FHWA RCNM Client Equipment Description, Data Source and/or Notes Source to NSR Distance (ft.) Distance- Adjusted Lmax Allowable Operation Time (hours) Allowable Operation Time (minutes) Predicted 8- hour Leq Demolition Dozer 0 40 82 0 0 0 0 0 Excavator 0 40 81 0 0 0 0 0 Concrete Saw 0 20 90 0 0 0 0 0 Total for Demolition Phase:4.8 Site Preparation Dozer 1 40 82 150 72 8 480 68 Backhoe 1 40 78 150 68 8 480 64 Front End Loader 1 40 79 150 69 8 480 65 Total for Site Preparation Phase:71.3 Grading Excavator 1 40 81 150 71 8 480 67 Grader 1 40 85 150 75 8 480 71 Dozer 0 40 82 150 0 8 480 0 Front End Loader 0 40 79 150 0 8 480 0 Backhoe 0 40 78 150 0 8 480 0 Scraper 1 40 84 150 74 8 480 70 Total for Grading Phase:74.92 Building Construction Crane 0 16 81 0 0 0 0 0 Man Lift 0 20 75 0 0 0 0 0 Generator 0 50 72 0 0 0 0 0 Backhoe 0 40 78 0 0 0 0 0 Front End Loader 0 40 79 0 0 0 0 0 Welder / Torch 0 40 73 0 0 0 0 0 Total for Building Construction Phase:7.8 Paving Paver 0 50 77 0 0 0 0 0 Roller 0 20 80 0 0 0 0 0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP 0 50 85 0 0 0 0 0 Total for Paving Phase:4.8 Architectural Coating Compressor (air) 0 40 78 0 0 0 0 0 Total for Architectural Coating Phase:0.0 TheFarms_cons-noise-est_mcs011120 prepared by Dudek Meadow The Farm in Poway - Technical Noise Report Appendix B - Construction Noise Modeling Worksheets To User: bordered cells are inputs, unbordered cells have formulae noise level limit for construction phase, per City of Poway =75 allowable hours over which Leq is to be averaged (example: 8 for Poway, County of San Diego, or FTA guidance) = 8 Construction Phase Equipment Total Equipment Qty AUF % (from FHWA RCNM) Reference Lmax @ 50 ft. from FHWA RCNM Client Equipment Description, Data Source and/or Notes Source to NSR Distance (ft.) Distance- Adjusted Lmax Allowable Operation Time (hours) Allowable Operation Time (minutes) Predicted 8- hour Leq Demolition Dozer 0 40 82 0 0 0 0 0 Excavator 0 40 81 0 0 0 0 0 Concrete Saw 0 20 90 0 0 0 0 0 Total for Demolition Phase:4.8 Site Preparation Dozer 0 40 82 25 0 1 60 0 Backhoe 1 40 78 25 84 1 60 71 Front End Loader 1 40 79 25 85 1 60 72 Total for Site Preparation Phase:74.5 Grading Excavator 0 40 81 25 0 1 60 0 Grader 1 40 85 25 91 1 60 78 Dozer 0 40 82 25 0 1 60 0 Front End Loader 0 40 79 25 0 1 60 0 Backhoe 0 40 78 25 0 1 60 0 Scraper 0 40 84 25 0 1 60 0 Total for Grading Phase:78.02 Building Construction Crane 0 16 81 0 0 0 0 0 Man Lift 0 20 75 0 0 0 0 0 Generator 1 50 72 25 78 1 60 66 Backhoe 0 40 78 0 0 0 0 0 Front End Loader 0 40 79 0 0 0 0 0 Welder / Torch 1 40 73 25 79 1 60 66 Total for Building Construction Phase:69.0 Paving Paver 1 50 77 25 83 1 60 71 Concrete mixer truck 1 40 79 25 85 1 60 72 Total for Paving Phase:74.5 Architectural Coating Compressor (air) 0 40 78 0 0 0 0 0 Total for Architectural Coating Phase:0.0 TheFarms_cons-noise-est_mcs011120 prepared by Dudek Trail_System The Farm in Poway - Technical Noise Report Appendix B - Construction Noise Modeling Worksheets To User: bordered cells are inputs, unbordered cells have formulae noise level limit for construction phase, per City of Poway =75 allowable hours over which Leq is to be averaged (example: 8 for Poway, County of San Diego, or FTA guidance) = 8 Construction Phase Equipment Total Equipment Qty AUF % (from FHWA RCNM) Reference Lmax @ 50 ft. from FHWA RCNM Client Equipment Description, Data Source and/or Notes Source to NSR Distance (ft.) Distance- Adjusted Lmax Allowable Operation Time (hours) Allowable Operation Time (minutes) Predicted 8- hour Leq Demolition Dozer 1 40 82 120 74 4 240 67 Excavator 1 40 81 120 73 4 240 66 Concrete Saw 1 20 90 120 82 4 240 72 Total for Demolition Phase:74.4 Site Preparation Dozer 1 40 82 50 82 2 120 72 Backhoe 1 40 78 50 78 2 120 68 Front End Loader 1 40 79 50 79 2 120 69 Total for Site Preparation Phase:74.8 Grading Excavator 1 40 81 50 81 1 60 68 Grader 1 40 85 50 85 0.75 45 71 Dozer 0 40 82 50 0 1 60 0 Front End Loader 0 40 79 50 0 1 60 0 Backhoe 0 40 78 50 0 1 60 0 Scraper 1 40 84 50 84 1 60 71 Total for Grading Phase:74.92 Building Construction Crane 1 16 81 100 75 8 480 67 Man Lift 1 20 75 100 69 8 480 62 Generator 1 50 72 100 66 8 480 63 Backhoe 1 40 78 100 72 8 480 68 Front End Loader 1 40 79 100 73 8 480 69 Welder / Torch 1 40 73 100 67 8 480 63 Total for Building Construction Phase:74.0 Paving Paver 0 50 77 0 0 0 0 0 Roller 0 20 80 0 0 0 0 0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP 0 50 85 0 0 0 0 0 Total for Paving Phase:4.8 Architectural Coating Compressor (air) 1 40 78 100 72 8 480 68 Total for Architectural Coating Phase:68.0 TheFarms_cons-noise-est_mcs011120 prepared by Dudek Newhomes The Farm in Poway - Technical Noise Report Appendix B - Construction Noise Modeling Worksheets To User: bordered cells are inputs, unbordered cells have formulae noise level limit for construction phase, per City of Poway =75 allowable hours over which Leq is to be averaged (example: 8 for Poway, County of San Diego, or FTA guidance) = 8 Construction Phase Equipment Total Equipment Qty AUF % (from FHWA RCNM) Reference Lmax @ 50 ft. from FHWA RCNM Client Equipment Description, Data Source and/or Notes Source to NSR Distance (ft.) Distance- Adjusted Lmax Allowable Operation Time (hours) Allowable Operation Time (minutes) Predicted 8- hour Leq Demolition Dozer 1 40 82 120 74 4 240 67 Excavator 1 40 81 120 73 4 240 66 Concrete Saw 1 20 90 120 82 4 240 72 Total for Demolition Phase:74.4 Site Preparation Dozer 1 40 82 50 82 2 120 72 Backhoe 1 40 78 50 78 2 120 68 Front End Loader 1 40 79 50 79 2 120 69 Total for Site Preparation Phase:74.8 Grading Excavator 1 40 81 50 81 1 60 68 Grader 1 40 85 50 85 0.75 45 71 Dozer 0 40 82 50 0 1 60 0 Front End Loader 0 40 79 50 0 1 60 0 Backhoe 0 40 78 50 0 1 60 0 Scraper 1 40 84 50 84 1 60 71 Total for Grading Phase:74.92 Building Construction Crane 1 16 81 360 64 8 480 56 Man Lift 1 20 75 360 58 8 480 51 Generator 1 50 72 360 55 8 480 52 Backhoe 1 40 78 360 61 8 480 57 Front End Loader 1 40 79 360 62 8 480 58 Welder / Torch 1 40 73 360 56 8 480 52 Total for Building Construction Phase:62.8 Paving Paver 1 50 77 120 69 4 240 63 Roller 1 20 80 120 72 4 240 62 All Other Equipment > 5 HP 1 50 85 120 77 4 240 71 Total for Paving Phase:72.5 Architectural Coating Compressor (air) 1 40 78 360 61 8 480 57 Total for Architectural Coating Phase:56.9 TheFarms_cons-noise-est_mcs011120 prepared by Dudek Barn The Farm in Poway - Technical Noise Report Appendix B - Construction Noise Modeling Worksheets To User: bordered cells are inputs, unbordered cells have formulae noise level limit for construction phase, per City of Poway =75 allowable hours over which Leq is to be averaged (example: 8 for Poway, County of San Diego, or FTA guidance) = 8 Construction Phase Equipment Total Equipment Qty AUF % (from FHWA RCNM) Reference Lmax @ 50 ft. from FHWA RCNM Client Equipment Description, Data Source and/or Notes Source to NSR Distance (ft.) Distance- Adjusted Lmax Allowable Operation Time (hours) Allowable Operation Time (minutes) Predicted 8- hour Leq Demolition Dozer 1 40 82 120 74 4 240 67 Excavator 1 40 81 120 73 4 240 66 Concrete Saw 1 20 90 120 82 4 240 72 Total for Demolition Phase:74.4 Site Preparation Dozer 1 40 82 50 82 2 120 72 Backhoe 1 40 78 50 78 2 120 68 Front End Loader 1 40 79 50 79 2 120 69 Total for Site Preparation Phase:74.8 Grading Excavator 1 40 81 50 81 1 60 68 Grader 1 40 85 50 85 0.75 45 71 Dozer 0 40 82 50 0 1 60 0 Front End Loader 0 40 79 50 0 1 60 0 Backhoe 0 40 78 50 0 1 60 0 Scraper 1 40 84 50 84 1 60 71 Total for Grading Phase:74.92 Building Construction Crane 1 16 81 300 65 8 480 57 Man Lift 1 20 75 300 59 8 480 52 Generator 1 50 72 300 56 8 480 53 Backhoe 1 40 78 300 62 8 480 58 Front End Loader 1 40 79 300 63 8 480 59 Welder / Torch 1 40 73 300 57 8 480 53 Total for Building Construction Phase:64.4 Paving Paver 1 50 77 50 77 1 60 65 Roller 1 20 80 50 80 1 60 64 All Other Equipment > 5 HP 1 50 85 50 85 1 60 73 Total for Paving Phase:74.0 Architectural Coating Compressor (air) 1 40 78 300 62 8 480 58 Total for Architectural Coating Phase:58.5 TheFarms_cons-noise-est_mcs011120 prepared by Dudek Club The Farm in Poway - Technical Noise Report Appendix B - Construction Noise Modeling Worksheets To User: bordered cells are inputs, unbordered cells have formulae noise level limit for construction phase, per City of Poway =75 allowable hours over which Leq is to be averaged (example: 8 for Poway, County of San Diego, or FTA guidance) = 8 Construction Phase Equipment Total Equipment Qty AUF % (from FHWA RCNM) Reference Lmax @ 50 ft. from FHWA RCNM Client Equipment Description, Data Source and/or Notes Source to NSR Distance (ft.) Distance- Adjusted Lmax Allowable Operation Time (hours) Allowable Operation Time (minutes) Predicted 8- hour Leq Demolition Dozer 0 40 82 0 0 0 0 0 Excavator 0 40 81 0 0 0 0 0 Concrete Saw 0 20 90 0 0 0 0 0 Total for Demolition Phase:4.8 Site Preparation Dozer 1 40 82 36 85 2 120 75 Backhoe 1 40 78 36 81 2 120 71 Front End Loader 1 40 79 36 82 2 120 72 Total for Site Preparation Phase:77.6 Grading Excavator 1 40 81 36 84 1 60 71 Grader 1 40 85 36 88 0.75 45 74 Dozer 0 40 82 36 0 1 60 0 Front End Loader 0 40 79 36 0 1 60 0 Backhoe 0 40 78 36 0 1 60 0 Scraper 1 40 84 36 87 1 60 74 Total for Grading Phase:77.72 Building Construction Crane 0 16 81 0 0 0 0 0 Man Lift 0 20 75 0 0 0 0 0 Generator 0 50 72 0 0 0 0 0 Backhoe 0 40 78 0 0 0 0 0 Front End Loader 0 40 79 0 0 0 0 0 Welder / Torch 0 40 73 0 0 0 0 0 Total for Building Construction Phase:7.8 Paving Paver 1 50 77 36 80 1 60 68 Roller 1 20 80 36 83 1 60 67 All Other Equipment > 5 HP 1 50 85 36 88 1 60 76 Total for Paving Phase:76.9 Architectural Coating Compressor (air) 0 40 78 0 0 0 0 0 Total for Architectural Coating Phase:0.0 TheFarms_cons-noise-est_mcs011120 prepared by Dudek PvtRdB The Farm in Poway - Technical Noise Report Appendix B - Construction Noise Modeling Worksheets To User: bordered cells are inputs, unbordered cells have formulae noise level limit for construction phase, per City of Poway =75 allowable hours over which Leq is to be averaged (example: 8 for Poway, County of San Diego, or FTA guidance) = 8 Construction Phase Equipment Total Equipment Qty AUF % (from FHWA RCNM) Reference Lmax @ 50 ft. from FHWA RCNM Client Equipment Description, Data Source and/or Notes Source to NSR Distance (ft.) Distance- Adjusted Lmax Allowable Operation Time (hours) Allowable Operation Time (minutes) Predicted 8- hour Leq Demolition Dozer 1 40 82 120 74 4 240 67 Excavator 1 40 81 120 73 4 240 66 Concrete Saw 1 20 90 120 82 4 240 72 Total for Demolition Phase:74.4 Site Preparation Dozer 1 40 82 15 92 2 120 82 Backhoe 1 40 78 15 88 2 120 78 Front End Loader 1 40 79 15 89 2 120 79 Total for Site Preparation Phase:85.2 Grading Excavator 1 40 81 15 91 1 60 78 Grader 1 40 85 15 95 0.75 45 81 Dozer 0 40 82 15 0 1 60 0 Front End Loader 0 40 79 15 0 1 60 0 Backhoe 0 40 78 15 0 1 60 0 Scraper 1 40 84 15 94 1 60 81 Total for Grading Phase:85.32 Building Construction Crane 0 16 81 0 0 0 0 0 Man Lift 0 20 75 0 0 0 0 0 Generator 0 50 72 0 0 0 0 0 Backhoe 0 40 78 0 0 0 0 0 Front End Loader 0 40 79 0 0 0 0 0 Welder / Torch 0 40 73 0 0 0 0 0 Total for Building Construction Phase:7.8 Paving Paver 0 50 77 0 0 0 0 0 Roller 0 20 80 0 0 0 0 0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP 0 50 85 0 0 0 0 0 Total for Paving Phase:4.8 Architectural Coating Compressor (air) 0 40 78 0 0 0 0 0 Total for Architectural Coating Phase:0.0 TheFarms_cons-noise-est_mcs011120 prepared by Dudek Basin The Farm in Poway - Technical Noise Report Appendix B - Construction Noise Modeling Worksheets To User: bordered cells are inputs, unbordered cells have formulae noise level limit for construction phase, per City of Poway =75 allowable hours over which Leq is to be averaged (example: 8 for Poway, County of San Diego, or FTA guidance) = 8 Construction Phase Equipment Total Equipment Qty AUF % (from FHWA RCNM) Reference Lmax @ 50 ft. from FHWA RCNM Client Equipment Description, Data Source and/or Notes Source to NSR Distance (ft.) Distance- Adjusted Lmax Allowable Operation Time (hours) Allowable Operation Time (minutes) Predicted 8- hour Leq Demolition Dozer 0 40 82 0 0 0 0 0 Excavator 0 40 81 0 0 0 0 0 Concrete Saw 0 20 90 0 0 0 0 0 Total for Demolition Phase:4.8 Site Preparation Dozer 1 40 82 50 82 2 120 72 Backhoe 1 40 78 50 78 2 120 68 Front End Loader 1 40 79 50 79 2 120 69 Total for Site Preparation Phase:74.8 Grading Excavator 1 40 81 50 81 1 60 68 Grader 1 40 85 50 85 0.75 45 71 Dozer 0 40 82 50 0 1 60 0 Front End Loader 0 40 79 50 0 1 60 0 Backhoe 0 40 78 50 0 1 60 0 Scraper 1 40 84 50 84 1 60 71 Total for Grading Phase:74.92 Building Construction Crane 0 16 81 0 0 0 0 0 Man Lift 0 20 75 0 0 0 0 0 Generator 0 50 72 0 0 0 0 0 Backhoe 0 40 78 0 0 0 0 0 Front End Loader 0 40 79 0 0 0 0 0 Welder / Torch 0 40 73 0 0 0 0 0 Total for Building Construction Phase:7.8 Paving Paver 0 50 77 0 0 0 0 0 Roller 0 20 80 0 0 0 0 0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP 0 50 85 0 0 0 0 0 Total for Paving Phase:4.8 Architectural Coating Compressor (air) 0 40 78 0 0 0 0 0 Total for Architectural Coating Phase:0.0 TheFarms_cons-noise-est_mcs011120 prepared by Dudek Agri Appendix C Traffic Noise Modeling Input and Output RESULTS: SOUND LEVELSThe FarmDudek 18 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 Calculated with TNM 2.5 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS PROJECT/CONTRACT: The Farm RUN: Existing BARRIER DESIGN: INPUT HEIGHTS Average pavement type shall be used unless a State highway agency substantiates the use ATMOSPHERICS: 68 deg F, 50% RH of a different type with approval of FHWA.ReceiverNameNo.#DUsExistingNo BarrierWith BarrierLAeq1hLAeq1h Increase over existing TypeCalculatedNoise ReductionCalculatedCrit'nCalculatedCrit'nImpactLAeq1hCalculatedGoalCalculatedSub'l IncminusGoaldBA dBA dBA dB dB dBA dB dB dB ST1 1 1 64.0 65.7 66 1.7 10 ----65.7 0.0 8 -8.0 ST4 2 1 52.5 47.8 66 -4.7 10 ----47.8 0.0 8 -8.0 ST2 3 1 43.1 41.0 66 -2.1 10 ----41.0 0.0 8 -8.0 ST3 4 1 42.2 52.5 66 10.3 10 Sub'l Inc52.5 0.0 8 -8.0 Dwelling Units # DUs Noise Reduction Min Avg Max dB dB dB All Selected40.0 0.00.0 All Impacted10.0 0.00.0 All that meet NR Goal00.0 0.00.0C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Existing 118 June 2019 INPUT: ROADWAYSThe FarmDudek 18 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 INPUT: ROADWAYS Average pavement type shall be used unlessPROJECT/CONTRACT:The Farm a State highway agency substantiates the useRUN:Existing of a different type with the approval of FHWARoadwayPointsNameWidthNameNo.Coordinates (pavement)Flow ControlSegmentXYZControlSpeedPercentPvmtOnDeviceConstraintVehiclesTypeStruct?Affectedft ft ft ft mph % West Espola W7 25.0 point1 1 1,271.9 885.2 0.00 Average point2 2 2,478.0 878.0 0.00 East Espola W7 25.0 point3 3 1,280.9 858.1 0.00 Average point4 4 2,474.4 858.1 0.00 West Espola E7 25.0 point5 5 2,528.5 878.0 0.00 Average point6 6 3,716.5 870.8 0.00 Average point7 7 4,221.3 865.1 0.00 East Espola E10 25.0 point16 16 7,502.8 683.3 0.00 Average point17 17 7,008.8 744.6 0.00 Average point18 18 6,756.4 773.4 0.00 Average point19 19 6,487.8 807.6 0.00 Average point20 20 5,563.4 826.3 0.00 Average point21 21 4,939.7 842.5 0.00 West Espola Rd E11 30.0 point23 23 7,568.0 693.5 0.00 Average point24 24 8,069.2 634.1 0.00 Average point25 25 8,274.7 605.2 0.00 Average point26 26 8,545.2 484.4 0.00 Average point27 27 8,748.9 322.1 0.00 Average point28 28 8,947.2 46.3 0.00 East Espola Rd E11 30.0 point29 29 8,897.8 43.3 0.00 Average point30 30 8,739.1 286.6 0.00 Average point31 31 8,627.4 391.2 0.00 Average point32 32 8,338.9 549.9 0.00 Average point33 33 8,077.5 607.5 0.00 Average point34 34 7,576.3 658.0 0.00C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Existing 118 June 2019 INPUT: ROADWAYSThe Farm Cloudcroft Dr N10 40.0 point35 35 4,949.1 887.8 0.00 Average point36 36 4,949.1 1,875.6 0.00 Average point37 37 4,944.7 2,055.4 0.00 Average point38 38 4,958.0 2,146.5 0.00 Average point39 39 5,022.4 2,233.0 0.00 CloudCroft Dr N25 40.0 point40 40 5,051.2 2,253.0 0.00 Average point41 41 5,137.8 2,295.2 0.00 Average point42 42 5,197.7 2,312.9 0.00 Average point43 43 6,201.1 2,293.0 0.00 Average point44 44 6,250.0 2,295.2 0.00 Average point45 45 6,245.5 2,506.1 0.00 Average point46 46 6,238.9 2,721.4 0.00 Average point47 47 6,181.2 2,938.9 0.00 Average point48 48 6,056.8 3,087.7 0.00 Average point49 49 5,894.8 3,196.5 0.00 Average point50 50 5,726.1 3,271.9 0.00 Average point51 51 5,424.2 3,287.5 0.00 Average point52 52 5,180.0 3,316.3 0.00 Average point53 53 5,111.2 3,371.8 0.00 Tam O Shanter N24 40.0 point54 54 5,093.4 3,380.7 0.00 Average point55 55 5,013.5 3,525.0 0.00 Average point56 56 4,995.7 3,558.3 0.00 Average point57 57 4,953.6 3,818.0 0.00 Average point58 58 4,933.6 4,008.9 0.00 Average point59 59 4,935.8 4,142.1 0.00 Average point60 60 4,962.4 4,337.5 0.00 Average point61 61 4,995.7 4,523.9 0.00 Average point62 62 5,042.4 4,617.2 0.00 Average point63 63 5,075.7 4,674.9 0.00 Average point64 64 5,162.2 4,732.6 0.00 Average point65 65 5,262.1 4,748.1 0.00 Average point66 66 6,012.4 4,743.7 0.00 Average point67 67 6,687.3 4,748.1 0.00 Average point68 68 6,760.5 4,757.0 0.00 Average point69 69 6,913.7 5,098.9 0.00 St Andrews Dr 40.0 point70 70 6,922.6 5,132.2 0.00 Average point72 72 7,026.9 5,416.3 0.00 Average point73 73 7,035.8 5,496.2 0.00 Average point74 74 6,971.4 5,689.4 0.00 Average C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Existing 218 June 2019 INPUT: ROADWAYSThe Farm point75 75 6,878.2 5,778.1 0.00 Average point76 76 6,753.9 5,842.5 0.00 Average point77 77 6,536.3 5,849.2 0.00 Average point78 78 4,891.4 5,824.8 0.00 Average point79 79 4,682.7 5,793.7 0.00 Average point80 80 4,471.9 5,691.6 0.00 Average point81 81 4,318.7 5,556.2 0.00 Average point82 82 4,178.8 5,387.5 0.00 Average point83 83 4,138.9 5,325.3 0.00 Average point84 84 4,078.9 5,163.3 0.00 Average point85 85 4,050.1 5,036.7 0.00 Average point86 86 4,041.2 4,273.1 0.00 Average point87 87 4,014.6 3,542.7 0.00 Average point88 88 4,012.3 2,583.8 0.00 Average point89 89 4,007.9 2,328.5 0.00 Average point90 90 4,005.7 2,146.5 0.00 Average point91 91 3,992.4 2,051.0 0.00 Average point92 92 3,916.9 1,911.2 0.00 Average point93 93 3,834.7 1,824.6 0.00 Average point94 94 3,739.3 1,766.9 0.00 Average point95 95 3,248.7 1,524.9 0.00 Average point96 96 3,084.4 1,462.7 0.00 Average point97 97 3,033.4 1,458.3 0.00 Average point71 71 2,551.7 1,449.4 0.00 Valley Verde Rd S8 50.0 point98 98 2,503.3 907.8 0.00 Average point99 99 2,505.5 1,009.9 0.00 Average point100 100 2,518.8 1,125.3 0.00 Average point101 101 2,518.8 1,229.7 0.00 Average point102 102 2,521.0 1,447.2 0.00 West Espola E10-2 25.0 point103 103 4,949.3 861.1 0.00 Average point9 9 5,541.0 850.9 0.00 Average point10 10 5,957.4 841.9 0.00 Average point11 11 6,489.2 825.7 0.00 Average point12 12 6,871.5 780.6 0.00 Average point13 13 7,105.8 748.2 0.00 Average point14 14 7,484.4 704.9 0.00 Average point15 15 7,515.1 701.3 0.00 East Espola E9 25.0 point104 104 4,939.7 842.5 0.00 Average point105 105 4,217.4 848.5 0.00C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Existing 318 June 2019 INPUT: ROADWAYSThe Farm West Espola E9 25.0 point106 106 4,221.3 865.1 0.00 Average point8 8 4,949.3 861.1 0.00 East Espola E7 25.0 point107 107 4,217.4 848.5 0.00 Average point22 22 2,534.3 854.5 0.00C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Existing 418 June 2019 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe FarmDudek 18 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h Volumes PROJECT/CONTRACT:The Farm RUN:Existing Roadway PointsNameNameNo.SegmentAutos MTrucks HTrucks Buses Motorcycles VSVSVSVSVSveh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph West Espola W7 point1 1101935 2135 1135 0 0 0 0 point2 2 East Espola W7 point3 3101935 2135 1135 0 0 0 0 point4 4 West Espola E7 point5 5 773 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point6 6 773 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point7 7 East Espola E10 point16 16 702 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point17 17 702 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point18 18 702 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point19 19 702 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point20 20 702 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point21 21 West Espola Rd E11 point23 23 594 35 12 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point24 24 594 35 12 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point25 25 594 35 12 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point26 26 594 35 12 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point27 27 594 35 12 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point28 28 East Espola Rd E11 point29 29 594 35 12 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point30 30 594 35 12 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point31 31 594 35 12 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point32 32 594 35 12 35 6 35 0 0 0 0C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Existing 118 J INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe Farm point33 33 594 35 12 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point34 34 Cloudcroft Dr N10 point35 35 132 25 3 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point36 36 132 25 3 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point37 37 132 25 3 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point38 38 132 25 3 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point39 39 CloudCroft Dr N25 point40 40 43 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point41 41 43 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point42 42 43 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point43 43 43 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point44 44 43 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point45 45 43 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point46 46 43 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point47 47 43 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point48 48 43 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point49 49 43 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point50 50 43 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point51 51 43 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point52 52 43 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point53 53 Tam O Shanter N24 point54 54 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point55 55 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point56 56 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point57 57 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point58 58 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point59 59 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point60 60 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point61 61 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point62 62 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point63 63 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point64 64 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point65 65 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point66 66 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point67 67 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point68 68 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Existing 218 J INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe Farm point69 69 St Andrews Dr point70 70 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point72 72 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point73 73 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point74 74 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point75 75 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point76 76 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point77 77 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point78 78 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point79 79 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point80 80 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point81 81 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point82 82 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point83 83 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point84 84 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point85 85 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point86 86 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point87 87 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point88 88 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point89 89 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point90 90 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point91 91 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point92 92 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point93 93 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point94 94 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point95 95 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point96 96 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point97 97 149 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point71 71 Valley Verde Rd S8 point98 98 611 35 13 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point99 99 611 35 13 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point100 100 611 35 13 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point101 101 611 35 13 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point102 102 West Espola E10-2 point103 103 702 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point9 9 702 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Existing 318 J INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe Farm point10 10 702 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point11 11 702 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point12 12 702 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point13 13 702 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point14 14 702 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point15 15 East Espola E9 point104 104 704 35 15 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point105 105 West Espola E9 point106 106 704 35 15 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point8 8 East Espola E7 point107 107 773 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point22 22C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Existing 418 J INPUT: RECEIVERSThe FarmDudek 18 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 INPUT: RECEIVERS PROJECT/CONTRACT:The Farm RUN:Existing ReceiverNameNo.#DUsCoordinates (ground)HeightInput Sound Levels and Criteria ActiveXYZaboveExistingImpact Criteria NRinGroundLAeq1hLAeq1hSub'lGoalCalc.ft ft ft ft dBA dBA dB dB ST1 1 1 4,228.2 801.6 0.00 4.92 64.00 66 10.0 8.0Y ST4 2 1 5,679.8 2,346.1 0.00 4.92 52.50 66 10.0 8.0Y ST2 3 1 4,384.1 3,690.0 0.00 4.92 43.10 66 10.0 8.0Y ST3 4 1 6,696.9 5,901.7 0.00 4.92 42.20 66 10.0 8.0Y C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Existing 118 J RESULTS: SOUND LEVELSThe FarmDudek 18 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 Calculated with TNM 2.5 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS PROJECT/CONTRACT: The Farm RUN: Near Opening Day BARRIER DESIGN: INPUT HEIGHTS Average pavement type shall be used unless a State highway agency substantiates the use ATMOSPHERICS: 68 deg F, 50% RH of a different type with approval of FHWA.ReceiverNameNo.#DUsExistingNo BarrierWith BarrierLAeq1hLAeq1h Increase over existing TypeCalculatedNoise ReductionCalculatedCrit'nCalculatedCrit'nImpactLAeq1hCalculatedGoalCalculatedSub'l IncminusGoaldBA dBA dBA dB dB dBA dB dB dB ST1 1 1 64.0 65.9 66 1.9 10 ----65.9 0.0 8 -8.0 ST4 2 1 52.5 48.0 66 -4.5 10 ----48.0 0.0 8 -8.0 ST2 3 1 43.1 41.1 66 -2.0 10 ----41.1 0.0 8 -8.0 ST3 4 1 42.2 52.6 66 10.4 10 Sub'l Inc52.6 0.0 8 -8.0 Dwelling Units # DUs Noise Reduction Min Avg Max dB dB dB All Selected40.0 0.00.0 All Impacted10.0 0.00.0 All that meet NR Goal00.0 0.00.0C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Near Opening Day 118 June 2019 INPUT: ROADWAYSThe FarmDudek 18 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 INPUT: ROADWAYS Average pavement type shall be used unlessPROJECT/CONTRACT:The Farm a State highway agency substantiates the useRUN:Near Opening Day of a different type with the approval of FHWARoadwayPointsNameWidthNameNo.Coordinates (pavement)Flow ControlSegmentXYZControlSpeedPercentPvmtOnDeviceConstraintVehiclesTypeStruct?Affectedft ft ft ft mph % West Espola W7 25.0 point1 1 1,271.9 885.2 0.00 Average point2 2 2,478.0 878.0 0.00 East Espola W7 25.0 point3 3 1,280.9 858.1 0.00 Average point4 4 2,474.4 858.1 0.00 West Espola E7 25.0 point5 5 2,528.5 878.0 0.00 Average point6 6 3,716.5 870.8 0.00 Average point7 7 4,221.3 865.1 0.00 East Espola E10 25.0 point16 16 7,502.8 683.3 0.00 Average point17 17 7,008.8 744.6 0.00 Average point18 18 6,756.4 773.4 0.00 Average point19 19 6,487.8 807.6 0.00 Average point20 20 5,563.4 826.3 0.00 Average point21 21 4,939.7 842.5 0.00 West Espola Rd E11 30.0 point23 23 7,568.0 693.5 0.00 Average point24 24 8,069.2 634.1 0.00 Average point25 25 8,274.7 605.2 0.00 Average point26 26 8,545.2 484.4 0.00 Average point27 27 8,748.9 322.1 0.00 Average point28 28 8,947.2 46.3 0.00 East Espola Rd E11 30.0 point29 29 8,897.8 43.3 0.00 Average point30 30 8,739.1 286.6 0.00 Average point31 31 8,627.4 391.2 0.00 Average point32 32 8,338.9 549.9 0.00 Average point33 33 8,077.5 607.5 0.00 Average point34 34 7,576.3 658.0 0.00C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Near Opening Day 118 J INPUT: ROADWAYSThe Farm Cloudcroft Dr N10 40.0 point35 35 4,949.1 887.8 0.00 Average point36 36 4,949.1 1,875.6 0.00 Average point37 37 4,944.7 2,055.4 0.00 Average point38 38 4,958.0 2,146.5 0.00 Average point39 39 5,022.4 2,233.0 0.00 CloudCroft Dr N25 40.0 point40 40 5,051.2 2,253.0 0.00 Average point41 41 5,137.8 2,295.2 0.00 Average point42 42 5,197.7 2,312.9 0.00 Average point43 43 6,201.1 2,293.0 0.00 Average point44 44 6,250.0 2,295.2 0.00 Average point45 45 6,245.5 2,506.1 0.00 Average point46 46 6,238.9 2,721.4 0.00 Average point47 47 6,181.2 2,938.9 0.00 Average point48 48 6,056.8 3,087.7 0.00 Average point49 49 5,894.8 3,196.5 0.00 Average point50 50 5,726.1 3,271.9 0.00 Average point51 51 5,424.2 3,287.5 0.00 Average point52 52 5,180.0 3,316.3 0.00 Average point53 53 5,111.2 3,371.8 0.00 Tam O Shanter N24 40.0 point54 54 5,093.4 3,380.7 0.00 Average point55 55 5,013.5 3,525.0 0.00 Average point56 56 4,995.7 3,558.3 0.00 Average point57 57 4,953.6 3,818.0 0.00 Average point58 58 4,933.6 4,008.9 0.00 Average point59 59 4,935.8 4,142.1 0.00 Average point60 60 4,962.4 4,337.5 0.00 Average point61 61 4,995.7 4,523.9 0.00 Average point62 62 5,042.4 4,617.2 0.00 Average point63 63 5,075.7 4,674.9 0.00 Average point64 64 5,162.2 4,732.6 0.00 Average point65 65 5,262.1 4,748.1 0.00 Average point66 66 6,012.4 4,743.7 0.00 Average point67 67 6,687.3 4,748.1 0.00 Average point68 68 6,760.5 4,757.0 0.00 Average point69 69 6,913.7 5,098.9 0.00 St Andrews Dr 40.0 point70 70 6,922.6 5,132.2 0.00 Average point72 72 7,026.9 5,416.3 0.00 Average point73 73 7,035.8 5,496.2 0.00 Average point74 74 6,971.4 5,689.4 0.00 Average C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Near Opening Day 218 J INPUT: ROADWAYSThe Farm point75 75 6,878.2 5,778.1 0.00 Average point76 76 6,753.9 5,842.5 0.00 Average point77 77 6,536.3 5,849.2 0.00 Average point78 78 4,891.4 5,824.8 0.00 Average point79 79 4,682.7 5,793.7 0.00 Average point80 80 4,471.9 5,691.6 0.00 Average point81 81 4,318.7 5,556.2 0.00 Average point82 82 4,178.8 5,387.5 0.00 Average point83 83 4,138.9 5,325.3 0.00 Average point84 84 4,078.9 5,163.3 0.00 Average point85 85 4,050.1 5,036.7 0.00 Average point86 86 4,041.2 4,273.1 0.00 Average point87 87 4,014.6 3,542.7 0.00 Average point88 88 4,012.3 2,583.8 0.00 Average point89 89 4,007.9 2,328.5 0.00 Average point90 90 4,005.7 2,146.5 0.00 Average point91 91 3,992.4 2,051.0 0.00 Average point92 92 3,916.9 1,911.2 0.00 Average point93 93 3,834.7 1,824.6 0.00 Average point94 94 3,739.3 1,766.9 0.00 Average point95 95 3,248.7 1,524.9 0.00 Average point96 96 3,084.4 1,462.7 0.00 Average point97 97 3,033.4 1,458.3 0.00 Average point71 71 2,551.7 1,449.4 0.00 Valley Verde Rd S8 50.0 point98 98 2,503.3 907.8 0.00 Average point99 99 2,505.5 1,009.9 0.00 Average point100 100 2,518.8 1,125.3 0.00 Average point101 101 2,518.8 1,229.7 0.00 Average point102 102 2,521.0 1,447.2 0.00 West Espola E10-2 25.0 point103 103 4,949.3 861.1 0.00 Average point9 9 5,541.0 850.9 0.00 Average point10 10 5,957.4 841.9 0.00 Average point11 11 6,489.2 825.7 0.00 Average point12 12 6,871.5 780.6 0.00 Average point13 13 7,105.8 748.2 0.00 Average point14 14 7,484.4 704.9 0.00 Average point15 15 7,515.1 701.3 0.00 East Espola E9 25.0 point104 104 4,939.7 842.5 0.00 Average point105 105 4,217.4 848.5 0.00C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Near Opening Day 318 J INPUT: ROADWAYSThe Farm West Espola E9 25.0 point106 106 4,221.3 865.1 0.00 Average point8 8 4,949.3 861.1 0.00 East Espola E7 25.0 point107 107 4,217.4 848.5 0.00 Average point22 22 2,534.3 854.5 0.00C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Near Opening Day 418 J INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe FarmDudek 18 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h Volumes PROJECT/CONTRACT:The Farm RUN:Near Opening Day Roadway PointsNameNameNo.SegmentAutos MTrucks HTrucks Buses Motorcycles VSVSVSVSVSveh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph West Espola W7 point1 1105535 2235 1135 0 0 0 0 point2 2 East Espola W7 point3 3105535 2235 1135 0 0 0 0 point4 4 West Espola E7 point5 5 800 35 17 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point6 6 800 35 17 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point7 7 East Espola E10 point16 16 727 35 15 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point17 17 727 35 15 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point18 18 727 35 15 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point19 19 727 35 15 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point20 20 727 35 15 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point21 21 West Espola Rd E11 point23 23 615 35 13 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point24 24 615 35 13 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point25 25 615 35 13 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point26 26 615 35 13 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point27 27 615 35 13 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point28 28 East Espola Rd E11 point29 29 615 35 13 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point30 30 615 35 13 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point31 31 615 35 13 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point32 32 615 35 13 35 6 35 0 0 0 0C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Near Opening Day 1 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe Farm point33 33 615 35 13 35 6 35 0 0 0 0 point34 34 Cloudcroft Dr N10 point35 35 138 25 3 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point36 36 138 25 3 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point37 37 138 25 3 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point38 38 138 25 3 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point39 39 CloudCroft Dr N25 point40 40 45 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point41 41 45 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point42 42 45 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point43 43 45 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point44 44 45 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point45 45 45 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point46 46 45 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point47 47 45 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point48 48 45 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point49 49 45 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point50 50 45 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point51 51 45 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point52 52 45 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point53 53 Tam O Shanter N24 point54 54 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point55 55 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point56 56 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point57 57 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point58 58 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point59 59 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point60 60 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point61 61 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point62 62 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point63 63 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point64 64 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point65 65 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point66 66 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point67 67 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point68 68 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Near Opening Day 2 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe Farm point69 69 St Andrews Dr point70 70 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point72 72 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point73 73 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point74 74 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point75 75 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point76 76 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point77 77 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point78 78 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point79 79 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point80 80 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point81 81 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point82 82 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point83 83 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point84 84 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point85 85 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point86 86 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point87 87 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point88 88 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point89 89 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point90 90 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point91 91 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point92 92 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point93 93 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point94 94 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point95 95 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point96 96 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point97 97 154 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point71 71 Valley Verde Rd S8 point98 98 633 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point99 99 633 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point100 100 633 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point101 101 633 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point102 102 West Espola E10-2 point103 103 727 35 15 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point9 9 727 35 15 35 7 35 0 0 0 0C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Near Opening Day 3 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe Farm point10 10 727 35 15 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point11 11 727 35 15 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point12 12 727 35 15 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point13 13 727 35 15 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point14 14 727 35 15 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point15 15 East Espola E9 point104 104 729 35 15 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point105 105 West Espola E9 point106 106 729 35 15 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point8 8 East Espola E7 point107 107 800 35 17 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point22 22C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Near Opening Day 4 INPUT: RECEIVERSThe FarmDudek 18 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 INPUT: RECEIVERS PROJECT/CONTRACT:The Farm RUN:Near Opening Day ReceiverNameNo.#DUsCoordinates (ground)HeightInput Sound Levels and Criteria ActiveXYZaboveExistingImpact Criteria NRinGroundLAeq1hLAeq1hSub'lGoalCalc.ft ft ft ft dBA dBA dB dB ST1 1 1 4,228.2 801.6 0.00 4.92 64.00 66 10.0 8.0Y ST4 2 1 5,679.8 2,346.1 0.00 4.92 52.50 66 10.0 8.0Y ST2 3 1 4,384.1 3,690.0 0.00 4.92 43.10 66 10.0 8.0Y ST3 4 1 6,696.9 5,901.7 0.00 4.92 42.20 66 10.0 8.0Y C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Near Opening Day 1 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELSThe FarmDudek 19 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 Calculated with TNM 2.5 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS PROJECT/CONTRACT: The Farm RUN: Near Opening Day + Project BARRIER DESIGN: INPUT HEIGHTS Average pavement type shall be used unless a State highway agency substantiates the use ATMOSPHERICS: 68 deg F, 50% RH of a different type with approval of FHWA.ReceiverNameNo.#DUsExistingNo BarrierWith BarrierLAeq1hLAeq1h Increase over existing TypeCalculatedNoise ReductionCalculatedCrit'nCalculatedCrit'nImpactLAeq1hCalculatedGoalCalculatedSub'l IncminusGoaldBA dBA dBA dB dB dBA dB dB dB ST1 1 1 64.0 66.2 66 2.2 10 Snd Lvl66.2 0.0 8 -8.0 ST4 2 1 52.5 50.1 66 -2.4 10 ----50.1 0.0 8 -8.0 ST2 3 1 43.1 44.1 66 1.0 10 ----44.1 0.0 8 -8.0 ST3 4 1 42.2 52.7 66 10.5 10 Sub'l Inc52.7 0.0 8 -8.0 Dwelling Units # DUs Noise Reduction Min Avg Max dB dB dB All Selected40.0 0.00.0 All Impacted20.0 0.00.0 All that meet NR Goal00.0 0.00.0C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Near Opening Day + Project 119 June 2019 INPUT: ROADWAYSThe FarmDudek 19 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 INPUT: ROADWAYS Average pavement type shall be used unlessPROJECT/CONTRACT:The Farm a State highway agency substantiates the useRUN:Near Opening Day + Project of a different type with the approval of FHWARoadwayPointsNameWidthNameNo.Coordinates (pavement)Flow ControlSegmentXYZControlSpeedPercentPvmtOnDeviceConstraintVehiclesTypeStruct?Affectedft ft ft ft mph % West Espola W7 25.0 point1 1 1,271.9 885.2 0.00 Average point2 2 2,478.0 878.0 0.00 East Espola W7 25.0 point3 3 1,280.9 858.1 0.00 Average point4 4 2,474.4 858.1 0.00 West Espola E7 25.0 point5 5 2,528.5 878.0 0.00 Average point6 6 3,716.5 870.8 0.00 Average point7 7 4,221.3 865.1 0.00 East Espola E10 25.0 point16 16 7,502.8 683.3 0.00 Average point17 17 7,008.8 744.6 0.00 Average point18 18 6,756.4 773.4 0.00 Average point19 19 6,487.8 807.6 0.00 Average point20 20 5,563.4 826.3 0.00 Average point21 21 4,939.7 842.5 0.00 West Espola Rd E11 30.0 point23 23 7,568.0 693.5 0.00 Average point24 24 8,069.2 634.1 0.00 Average point25 25 8,274.7 605.2 0.00 Average point26 26 8,545.2 484.4 0.00 Average point27 27 8,748.9 322.1 0.00 Average point28 28 8,947.2 46.3 0.00 East Espola Rd E11 30.0 point29 29 8,897.8 43.3 0.00 Average point30 30 8,739.1 286.6 0.00 Average point31 31 8,627.4 391.2 0.00 Average point32 32 8,338.9 549.9 0.00 Average point33 33 8,077.5 607.5 0.00 Average point34 34 7,576.3 658.0 0.00C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Near Opening Day + Project 119 J INPUT: ROADWAYSThe Farm Cloudcroft Dr N10 40.0 point35 35 4,949.1 887.8 0.00 Average point36 36 4,949.1 1,875.6 0.00 Average point37 37 4,944.7 2,055.4 0.00 Average point38 38 4,958.0 2,146.5 0.00 Average point39 39 5,022.4 2,233.0 0.00 CloudCroft Dr N25 40.0 point40 40 5,051.2 2,253.0 0.00 Average point41 41 5,137.8 2,295.2 0.00 Average point42 42 5,197.7 2,312.9 0.00 Average point43 43 6,201.1 2,293.0 0.00 Average point44 44 6,250.0 2,295.2 0.00 Average point45 45 6,245.5 2,506.1 0.00 Average point46 46 6,238.9 2,721.4 0.00 Average point47 47 6,181.2 2,938.9 0.00 Average point48 48 6,056.8 3,087.7 0.00 Average point49 49 5,894.8 3,196.5 0.00 Average point50 50 5,726.1 3,271.9 0.00 Average point51 51 5,424.2 3,287.5 0.00 Average point52 52 5,180.0 3,316.3 0.00 Average point53 53 5,111.2 3,371.8 0.00 Tam O Shanter N24 40.0 point54 54 5,093.4 3,380.7 0.00 Average point55 55 5,013.5 3,525.0 0.00 Average point56 56 4,995.7 3,558.3 0.00 Average point57 57 4,953.6 3,818.0 0.00 Average point58 58 4,933.6 4,008.9 0.00 Average point59 59 4,935.8 4,142.1 0.00 Average point60 60 4,962.4 4,337.5 0.00 Average point61 61 4,995.7 4,523.9 0.00 Average point62 62 5,042.4 4,617.2 0.00 Average point63 63 5,075.7 4,674.9 0.00 Average point64 64 5,162.2 4,732.6 0.00 Average point65 65 5,262.1 4,748.1 0.00 Average point66 66 6,012.4 4,743.7 0.00 Average point67 67 6,687.3 4,748.1 0.00 Average point68 68 6,760.5 4,757.0 0.00 Average point69 69 6,913.7 5,098.9 0.00 St Andrews Dr 40.0 point70 70 6,922.6 5,132.2 0.00 Average point72 72 7,026.9 5,416.3 0.00 Average point73 73 7,035.8 5,496.2 0.00 Average point74 74 6,971.4 5,689.4 0.00 Average C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Near Opening Day + Project 219 J INPUT: ROADWAYSThe Farm point75 75 6,878.2 5,778.1 0.00 Average point76 76 6,753.9 5,842.5 0.00 Average point77 77 6,536.3 5,849.2 0.00 Average point78 78 4,891.4 5,824.8 0.00 Average point79 79 4,682.7 5,793.7 0.00 Average point80 80 4,471.9 5,691.6 0.00 Average point81 81 4,318.7 5,556.2 0.00 Average point82 82 4,178.8 5,387.5 0.00 Average point83 83 4,138.9 5,325.3 0.00 Average point84 84 4,078.9 5,163.3 0.00 Average point85 85 4,050.1 5,036.7 0.00 Average point86 86 4,041.2 4,273.1 0.00 Average point87 87 4,014.6 3,542.7 0.00 Average point88 88 4,012.3 2,583.8 0.00 Average point89 89 4,007.9 2,328.5 0.00 Average point90 90 4,005.7 2,146.5 0.00 Average point91 91 3,992.4 2,051.0 0.00 Average point92 92 3,916.9 1,911.2 0.00 Average point93 93 3,834.7 1,824.6 0.00 Average point94 94 3,739.3 1,766.9 0.00 Average point95 95 3,248.7 1,524.9 0.00 Average point96 96 3,084.4 1,462.7 0.00 Average point97 97 3,033.4 1,458.3 0.00 Average point71 71 2,551.7 1,449.4 0.00 Valley Verde Rd S8 50.0 point98 98 2,503.3 907.8 0.00 Average point99 99 2,505.5 1,009.9 0.00 Average point100 100 2,518.8 1,125.3 0.00 Average point101 101 2,518.8 1,229.7 0.00 Average point102 102 2,521.0 1,447.2 0.00 West Espola E10-2 25.0 point103 103 4,949.3 861.1 0.00 Average point9 9 5,541.0 850.9 0.00 Average point10 10 5,957.4 841.9 0.00 Average point11 11 6,489.2 825.7 0.00 Average point12 12 6,871.5 780.6 0.00 Average point13 13 7,105.8 748.2 0.00 Average point14 14 7,484.4 704.9 0.00 Average point15 15 7,515.1 701.3 0.00 East Espola E9 25.0 point104 104 4,939.7 842.5 0.00 Average point105 105 4,217.4 848.5 0.00C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Near Opening Day + Project 319 J INPUT: ROADWAYSThe Farm West Espola E9 25.0 point106 106 4,221.3 865.1 0.00 Average point8 8 4,949.3 861.1 0.00 East Espola E7 25.0 point107 107 4,217.4 848.5 0.00 Average point22 22 2,534.3 854.5 0.00 Road A 30.0 point108 108 4,148.8 960.2 0.00 Average point109 109 4,163.7 1,391.9 0.00 Average point110 110 4,170.4 1,438.4 0.00 Average point111 111 4,358.0 1,639.3 0.00 Average point112 112 4,446.0 1,733.9 0.00 Average point113 113 4,467.6 2,595.6 0.00 Average point114 114 4,479.2 2,652.1 0.00 Average point115 115 4,542.3 2,738.4 0.00 Average point116 116 4,628.6 2,821.5 0.00 Average point117 117 4,847.8 3,042.3 0.00 Average point118 118 4,905.9 3,131.9 0.00 Average point119 119 4,915.9 3,331.2 0.00 Average point120 120 5,010.5 3,455.7 0.00 Road E 30.0 point121 121 4,889.3 3,342.8 0.00 Average point122 122 4,685.1 3,417.5 0.00 Average point123 123 4,617.0 3,457.3 0.00 Average point124 124 4,573.9 3,540.4 0.00 Average point125 125 4,578.8 3,621.7 0.00 Average point126 126 4,588.8 3,742.9 0.00 Average point127 127 4,582.2 3,829.3 0.00 Average point128 128 4,540.6 3,952.1 0.00 Average point129 129 4,530.7 4,020.2 0.00 Average point130 130 4,567.2 4,199.5 0.00 Average point131 131 4,632.0 4,344.0 0.00 Average point132 132 4,658.5 4,475.2 0.00 Average point133 133 4,691.7 4,734.2 0.00 Average point134 134 4,748.2 4,820.5 0.00 Average point135 135 4,891.0 4,920.1 0.00 Average point136 136 5,017.2 4,941.7 0.00 Average point137 137 5,561.8 4,955.0 0.00 Average point138 138 5,736.1 5,013.1 0.00 Average point139 139 5,820.8 5,049.6 0.00 Average point140 140 6,406.9 5,048.0 0.00 Average point141 141 6,773.8 4,968.3 0.00 Average point142 142 6,813.7 4,956.7 0.00C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Near Opening Day + Project 419 J INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe FarmDudek 19 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h Volumes PROJECT/CONTRACT:The Farm RUN:Near Opening Day + Project Roadway PointsNameNameNo.SegmentAutos MTrucks HTrucks Buses Motorcycles VSVSVSVSVSveh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph West Espola W7 point1 1114135 2435 1235 0 0 0 0 point2 2 East Espola W7 point3 3114135 2435 1235 0 0 0 0 point4 4 West Espola E7 point5 5 884 35 18 35 9 35 0 0 0 0 point6 6 884 35 18 35 9 35 0 0 0 0 point7 7 East Espola E10 point16 16 758 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point17 17 758 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point18 18 758 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point19 19 758 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point20 20 758 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point21 21 West Espola Rd E11 point23 23 647 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point24 24 647 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point25 25 647 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point26 26 647 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point27 27 647 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point28 28 East Espola Rd E11 point29 29 647 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point30 30 647 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point31 31 647 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point32 32 647 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Near Opening Day + Project 1 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe Farm point33 33 647 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point34 34 Cloudcroft Dr N10 point35 35 145 25 3 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point36 36 145 25 3 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point37 37 145 25 3 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point38 38 145 25 3 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point39 39 CloudCroft Dr N25 point40 40 50 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point41 41 50 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point42 42 50 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point43 43 50 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point44 44 50 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point45 45 50 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point46 46 50 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point47 47 50 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point48 48 50 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point49 49 50 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point50 50 50 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point51 51 50 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point52 52 50 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point53 53 Tam O Shanter N24 point54 54 157 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point55 55 157 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point56 56 157 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point57 57 157 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point58 58 157 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point59 59 157 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point60 60 157 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point61 61 157 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point62 62 157 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point63 63 157 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point64 64 157 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point65 65 157 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point66 66 157 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point67 67 157 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point68 68 157 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Near Opening Day + Project 2 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe Farm point69 69 St Andrews Dr point70 70 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point72 72 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point73 73 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point74 74 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point75 75 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point76 76 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point77 77 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point78 78 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point79 79 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point80 80 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point81 81 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point82 82 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point83 83 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point84 84 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point85 85 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point86 86 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point87 87 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point88 88 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point89 89 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point90 90 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point91 91 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point92 92 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point93 93 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point94 94 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point95 95 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point96 96 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point97 97 159 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point71 71 Valley Verde Rd S8 point98 98 638 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point99 99 638 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point100 100 638 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point101 101 638 35 13 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point102 102 West Espola E10-2 point103 103 758 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point9 9 758 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Near Opening Day + Project 3 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe Farm point10 10 758 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point11 11 758 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point12 12 758 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point13 13 758 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point14 14 758 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point15 15 East Espola E9 point104 104 757 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point105 105 West Espola E9 point106 106 757 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point8 8 East Espola E7 point107 107 884 35 18 35 9 35 0 0 0 0 point22 22 Road A point108 108 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point109 109 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point110 110 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point111 111 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point112 112 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point113 113 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point114 114 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point115 115 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point116 116 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point117 117 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point118 118 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point119 119 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point120 120 Road E point121 121 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point122 122 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point123 123 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point124 124 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point125 125 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point126 126 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point127 127 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point128 128 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point129 129 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point130 130 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point131 131 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Near Opening Day + Project 4 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe Farm point132 132 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point133 133 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point134 134 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point1350 49251251250000 point136 136 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point137 137 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point138 138 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point139 139 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point140 140 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point141 141 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point142 142C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Near Opening Day + Project 5 INPUT: RECEIVERSThe FarmDudek 19 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 INPUT: RECEIVERS PROJECT/CONTRACT:The Farm RUN:Near Opening Day + Project ReceiverNameNo.#DUsCoordinates (ground)HeightInput Sound Levels and Criteria ActiveXYZaboveExistingImpact Criteria NRinGroundLAeq1hLAeq1hSub'lGoalCalc.ft ft ft ft dBA dBA dB dB ST1 1 1 4,228.2 801.6 0.00 4.92 64.00 66 10.0 8.0Y ST4 2 1 5,679.8 2,346.1 0.00 4.92 52.50 66 10.0 8.0Y ST2 3 1 4,384.1 3,690.0 0.00 4.92 43.10 66 10.0 8.0Y ST3 4 1 6,696.9 5,901.7 0.00 4.92 42.20 66 10.0 8.0Y C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Near Opening Day + Project 1 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELSThe FarmDudek 18 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 Calculated with TNM 2.5 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS PROJECT/CONTRACT: The Farm RUN: Horizon Year without Project BARRIER DESIGN: INPUT HEIGHTS Average pavement type shall be used unless a State highway agency substantiates the use ATMOSPHERICS: 68 deg F, 50% RH of a different type with approval of FHWA.ReceiverNameNo.#DUsExistingNo BarrierWith BarrierLAeq1hLAeq1h Increase over existing TypeCalculatedNoise ReductionCalculatedCrit'nCalculatedCrit'nImpactLAeq1hCalculatedGoalCalculatedSub'l IncminusGoaldBA dBA dBA dB dB dBA dB dB dB ST1 1 1 64.0 66.9 66 2.9 10 Snd Lvl66.9 0.0 8 -8.0 ST4 2 1 52.5 48.3 66 -4.2 10 ----48.3 0.0 8 -8.0 ST2 3 1 43.1 41.4 66 -1.7 10 ----41.4 0.0 8 -8.0 ST3 4 1 42.2 52.8 66 10.6 10 Sub'l Inc52.8 0.0 8 -8.0 Dwelling Units # DUs Noise Reduction Min Avg Max dB dB dB All Selected40.0 0.00.0 All Impacted20.0 0.00.0 All that meet NR Goal00.0 0.00.0C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Horizon Year no project 118 June 2019 INPUT: ROADWAYSThe FarmDudek 18 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 INPUT: ROADWAYS Average pavement type shall be used unlessPROJECT/CONTRACT:The Farm a State highway agency substantiates the useRUN:Horizon Year without Project of a different type with the approval of FHWARoadwayPointsNameWidthNameNo.Coordinates (pavement)Flow ControlSegmentXYZControlSpeedPercentPvmtOnDeviceConstraintVehiclesTypeStruct?Affectedft ft ft ft mph % West Espola W7 25.0 point1 1 1,271.9 885.2 0.00 Average point2 2 2,478.0 878.0 0.00 East Espola W7 25.0 point3 3 1,280.9 858.1 0.00 Average point4 4 2,474.4 858.1 0.00 West Espola E7 25.0 point5 5 2,528.5 878.0 0.00 Average point6 6 3,716.5 870.8 0.00 Average point7 7 4,221.3 865.1 0.00 East Espola E10 25.0 point16 16 7,502.8 683.3 0.00 Average point17 17 7,008.8 744.6 0.00 Average point18 18 6,756.4 773.4 0.00 Average point19 19 6,487.8 807.6 0.00 Average point20 20 5,563.4 826.3 0.00 Average point21 21 4,939.7 842.5 0.00 West Espola Rd E11 30.0 point23 23 7,568.0 693.5 0.00 Average point24 24 8,069.2 634.1 0.00 Average point25 25 8,274.7 605.2 0.00 Average point26 26 8,545.2 484.4 0.00 Average point27 27 8,748.9 322.1 0.00 Average point28 28 8,947.2 46.3 0.00 East Espola Rd E11 30.0 point29 29 8,897.8 43.3 0.00 Average point30 30 8,739.1 286.6 0.00 Average point31 31 8,627.4 391.2 0.00 Average point32 32 8,338.9 549.9 0.00 Average point33 33 8,077.5 607.5 0.00 Average point34 34 7,576.3 658.0 0.00C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Horizon Year no project 118 J INPUT: ROADWAYSThe Farm Cloudcroft Dr N10 40.0 point35 35 4,949.1 887.8 0.00 Average point36 36 4,949.1 1,875.6 0.00 Average point37 37 4,944.7 2,055.4 0.00 Average point38 38 4,958.0 2,146.5 0.00 Average point39 39 5,022.4 2,233.0 0.00 CloudCroft Dr N25 40.0 point40 40 5,051.2 2,253.0 0.00 Average point41 41 5,137.8 2,295.2 0.00 Average point42 42 5,197.7 2,312.9 0.00 Average point43 43 6,201.1 2,293.0 0.00 Average point44 44 6,250.0 2,295.2 0.00 Average point45 45 6,245.5 2,506.1 0.00 Average point46 46 6,238.9 2,721.4 0.00 Average point47 47 6,181.2 2,938.9 0.00 Average point48 48 6,056.8 3,087.7 0.00 Average point49 49 5,894.8 3,196.5 0.00 Average point50 50 5,726.1 3,271.9 0.00 Average point51 51 5,424.2 3,287.5 0.00 Average point52 52 5,180.0 3,316.3 0.00 Average point53 53 5,111.2 3,371.8 0.00 Tam O Shanter N24 40.0 point54 54 5,093.4 3,380.7 0.00 Average point55 55 5,013.5 3,525.0 0.00 Average point56 56 4,995.7 3,558.3 0.00 Average point57 57 4,953.6 3,818.0 0.00 Average point58 58 4,933.6 4,008.9 0.00 Average point59 59 4,935.8 4,142.1 0.00 Average point60 60 4,962.4 4,337.5 0.00 Average point61 61 4,995.7 4,523.9 0.00 Average point62 62 5,042.4 4,617.2 0.00 Average point63 63 5,075.7 4,674.9 0.00 Average point64 64 5,162.2 4,732.6 0.00 Average point65 65 5,262.1 4,748.1 0.00 Average point66 66 6,012.4 4,743.7 0.00 Average point67 67 6,687.3 4,748.1 0.00 Average point68 68 6,760.5 4,757.0 0.00 Average point69 69 6,913.7 5,098.9 0.00 St Andrews Dr 40.0 point70 70 6,922.6 5,132.2 0.00 Average point72 72 7,026.9 5,416.3 0.00 Average point73 73 7,035.8 5,496.2 0.00 Average point74 74 6,971.4 5,689.4 0.00 Average C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Horizon Year no project 218 J INPUT: ROADWAYSThe Farm point75 75 6,878.2 5,778.1 0.00 Average point76 76 6,753.9 5,842.5 0.00 Average point77 77 6,536.3 5,849.2 0.00 Average point78 78 4,891.4 5,824.8 0.00 Average point79 79 4,682.7 5,793.7 0.00 Average point80 80 4,471.9 5,691.6 0.00 Average point81 81 4,318.7 5,556.2 0.00 Average point82 82 4,178.8 5,387.5 0.00 Average point83 83 4,138.9 5,325.3 0.00 Average point84 84 4,078.9 5,163.3 0.00 Average point85 85 4,050.1 5,036.7 0.00 Average point86 86 4,041.2 4,273.1 0.00 Average point87 87 4,014.6 3,542.7 0.00 Average point88 88 4,012.3 2,583.8 0.00 Average point89 89 4,007.9 2,328.5 0.00 Average point90 90 4,005.7 2,146.5 0.00 Average point91 91 3,992.4 2,051.0 0.00 Average point92 92 3,916.9 1,911.2 0.00 Average point93 93 3,834.7 1,824.6 0.00 Average point94 94 3,739.3 1,766.9 0.00 Average point95 95 3,248.7 1,524.9 0.00 Average point96 96 3,084.4 1,462.7 0.00 Average point97 97 3,033.4 1,458.3 0.00 Average point71 71 2,551.7 1,449.4 0.00 Valley Verde Rd S8 50.0 point98 98 2,503.3 907.8 0.00 Average point99 99 2,505.5 1,009.9 0.00 Average point100 100 2,518.8 1,125.3 0.00 Average point101 101 2,518.8 1,229.7 0.00 Average point102 102 2,521.0 1,447.2 0.00 West Espola E10-2 25.0 point103 103 4,949.3 861.1 0.00 Average point9 9 5,541.0 850.9 0.00 Average point10 10 5,957.4 841.9 0.00 Average point11 11 6,489.2 825.7 0.00 Average point12 12 6,871.5 780.6 0.00 Average point13 13 7,105.8 748.2 0.00 Average point14 14 7,484.4 704.9 0.00 Average point15 15 7,515.1 701.3 0.00 East Espola E9 25.0 point104 104 4,939.7 842.5 0.00 Average point105 105 4,217.4 848.5 0.00C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Horizon Year no project 318 J INPUT: ROADWAYSThe Farm West Espola E9 25.0 point106 106 4,221.3 865.1 0.00 Average point8 8 4,949.3 861.1 0.00 East Espola E7 25.0 point107 107 4,217.4 848.5 0.00 Average point22 22 2,534.3 854.5 0.00C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Horizon Year no project 418 J INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe FarmDudek 18 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h Volumes PROJECT/CONTRACT:The Farm RUN:Horizon Year without Project Roadway PointsNameNameNo.SegmentAutos MTrucks HTrucks Buses Motorcycles VSVSVSVSVSveh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph West Espola W7 point1 1126135 2635 1335 0 0 0 0 point2 2 East Espola W7 point3 3126135 2635 1335 0 0 0 0 point4 4 West Espola E7 point5 5100435 2135 1035 0 0 0 0 point6 6100435 2135 1035 0 0 0 0 point7 7 East Espola E10 point16 16 912 35 19 35 9 35 0 0 0 0 point17 17 912 35 19 35 9 35 0 0 0 0 point18 18 912 35 19 35 9 35 0 0 0 0 point19 19 912 35 19 35 9 35 0 0 0 0 point20 20 912 35 19 35 9 35 0 0 0 0 point21 21 West Espola Rd E11 point23 23 773 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point24 24 773 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point25 25 773 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point26 26 773 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point27 27 773 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point28 28 East Espola Rd E11 point29 29 773 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point30 30 773 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point31 31 773 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point32 32 773 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Horizon Year no project 1 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe Farm point33 33 773 35 16 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point34 34 Cloudcroft Dr N10 point35 35 140 25 3 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point36 36 140 25 3 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point37 37 140 25 3 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point38 38 140 25 3 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point39 39 CloudCroft Dr N25 point40 40 48 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point41 41 48 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point42 42 48 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point43 43 48 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point44 44 48 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point45 45 48 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point46 46 48 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point47 47 48 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point48 48 48 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point49 49 48 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point50 50 48 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point51 51 48 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point52 52 48 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 point53 53 Tam O Shanter N24 point54 54 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point55 55 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point56 56 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point57 57 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point58 58 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point59 59 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point60 60 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point61 61 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point62 62 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point63 63 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point64 64 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point65 65 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point66 66 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point67 67 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point68 68 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Horizon Year no project 2 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe Farm point69 69 St Andrews Dr point70 70 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point72 72 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point73 73 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point74 74 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point75 75 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point76 76 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point77 77 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point78 78 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point79 79 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point80 80 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point81 81 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point82 82 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point83 83 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point84 84 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point85 85 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point86 86 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point87 87 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point88 88 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point89 89 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point90 90 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point91 91 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point92 92 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point93 93 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point94 94 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point95 95 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point96 96 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point97 97 164 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point71 71 Valley Verde Rd S8 point98 98 672 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point99 99 672 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point100 100 672 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point101 101 672 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point102 102 West Espola E10-2 point103 103 912 35 19 35 9 35 0 0 0 0 point9 9 912 35 19 35 9 35 0 0 0 0C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Horizon Year no project 3 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe Farm point10 10 912 35 19 35 9 35 0 0 0 0 point11 11 912 35 19 35 9 35 0 0 0 0 point12 12 912 35 19 35 9 35 0 0 0 0 point13 13 912 35 19 35 9 35 0 0 0 0 point14 14 912 35 19 35 9 35 0 0 0 0 point15 15 East Espola E9 point104 104 915 35 19 35 9 35 0 0 0 0 point105 105 West Espola E9 point106 106 915 35 19 35 9 35 0 0 0 0 point8 8 East Espola E7 point107 107 1004 35 21 35 10 35 0 0 0 0 point22 22C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Horizon Year no project 4 INPUT: RECEIVERSThe FarmDudek 18 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 INPUT: RECEIVERS PROJECT/CONTRACT:The Farm RUN:Horizon Year without Project ReceiverNameNo.#DUsCoordinates (ground)HeightInput Sound Levels and Criteria ActiveXYZaboveExistingImpact Criteria NRinGroundLAeq1hLAeq1hSub'lGoalCalc.ft ft ft ft dBA dBA dB dB ST1 1 1 4,228.2 801.6 0.00 4.92 64.00 66 10.0 8.0Y ST4 2 1 5,679.8 2,346.1 0.00 4.92 52.50 66 10.0 8.0Y ST2 3 1 4,384.1 3,690.0 0.00 4.92 43.10 66 10.0 8.0Y ST3 4 1 6,696.9 5,901.7 0.00 4.92 42.20 66 10.0 8.0Y C:\TNM25\PROJECTS\THE FARM\Horizon Year no project 1 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELSThe FarmDudek 19 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 Calculated with TNM 2.5 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS PROJECT/CONTRACT: The Farm RUN: Horizon Year With Project BARRIER DESIGN: INPUT HEIGHTS Average pavement type shall be used unless a State highway agency substantiates the use ATMOSPHERICS: 68 deg F, 50% RH of a different type with approval of FHWA.ReceiverNameNo.#DUsExistingNo BarrierWith BarrierLAeq1hLAeq1h Increase over existing TypeCalculatedNoise ReductionCalculatedCrit'nCalculatedCrit'nImpactLAeq1hCalculatedGoalCalculatedSub'l IncminusGoaldBA dBA dBA dB dB dBA dB dB dB ST1 1 1 64.0 67.1 66 3.1 10 Snd Lvl67.1 0.0 8 -8.0 ST4 2 1 52.5 50.3 66 -2.2 10 ----50.3 0.0 8 -8.0 ST2 3 1 43.1 44.3 66 1.2 10 ----44.3 0.0 8 -8.0 ST3 4 1 42.2 52.8 66 10.6 10 Sub'l Inc52.8 0.0 8 -8.0 Dwelling Units # DUs Noise Reduction Min Avg Max dB dB dB All Selected40.0 0.00.0 All Impacted20.0 0.00.0 All that meet NR Goal00.0 0.00.0C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Horizon Year with Project 119 June 2019 INPUT: ROADWAYSThe FarmDudek 19 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 INPUT: ROADWAYS Average pavement type shall be used unlessPROJECT/CONTRACT:The Farm a State highway agency substantiates the useRUN:Horizon Year With Project of a different type with the approval of FHWARoadwayPointsNameWidthNameNo.Coordinates (pavement)Flow ControlSegmentXYZControlSpeedPercentPvmtOnDeviceConstraintVehiclesTypeStruct?Affectedft ft ft ft mph % West Espola W7 25.0 point1 1 1,271.9 885.2 0.00 Average point2 2 2,478.0 878.0 0.00 East Espola W7 25.0 point3 3 1,280.9 858.1 0.00 Average point4 4 2,474.4 858.1 0.00 West Espola E7 25.0 point5 5 2,528.5 878.0 0.00 Average point6 6 3,716.5 870.8 0.00 Average point7 7 4,221.3 865.1 0.00 East Espola E10 25.0 point16 16 7,502.8 683.3 0.00 Average point17 17 7,008.8 744.6 0.00 Average point18 18 6,756.4 773.4 0.00 Average point19 19 6,487.8 807.6 0.00 Average point20 20 5,563.4 826.3 0.00 Average point21 21 4,939.7 842.5 0.00 West Espola Rd E11 30.0 point23 23 7,568.0 693.5 0.00 Average point24 24 8,069.2 634.1 0.00 Average point25 25 8,274.7 605.2 0.00 Average point26 26 8,545.2 484.4 0.00 Average point27 27 8,748.9 322.1 0.00 Average point28 28 8,947.2 46.3 0.00 East Espola Rd E11 30.0 point29 29 8,897.8 43.3 0.00 Average point30 30 8,739.1 286.6 0.00 Average point31 31 8,627.4 391.2 0.00 Average point32 32 8,338.9 549.9 0.00 Average point33 33 8,077.5 607.5 0.00 Average point34 34 7,576.3 658.0 0.00C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Horizon Year with Project 119 J INPUT: ROADWAYSThe Farm Cloudcroft Dr N10 40.0 point35 35 4,949.1 887.8 0.00 Average point36 36 4,949.1 1,875.6 0.00 Average point37 37 4,944.7 2,055.4 0.00 Average point38 38 4,958.0 2,146.5 0.00 Average point39 39 5,022.4 2,233.0 0.00 CloudCroft Dr N25 40.0 point40 40 5,051.2 2,253.0 0.00 Average point41 41 5,137.8 2,295.2 0.00 Average point42 42 5,197.7 2,312.9 0.00 Average point43 43 6,201.1 2,293.0 0.00 Average point44 44 6,250.0 2,295.2 0.00 Average point45 45 6,245.5 2,506.1 0.00 Average point46 46 6,238.9 2,721.4 0.00 Average point47 47 6,181.2 2,938.9 0.00 Average point48 48 6,056.8 3,087.7 0.00 Average point49 49 5,894.8 3,196.5 0.00 Average point50 50 5,726.1 3,271.9 0.00 Average point51 51 5,424.2 3,287.5 0.00 Average point52 52 5,180.0 3,316.3 0.00 Average point53 53 5,111.2 3,371.8 0.00 Tam O Shanter N24 40.0 point54 54 5,093.4 3,380.7 0.00 Average point55 55 5,013.5 3,525.0 0.00 Average point56 56 4,995.7 3,558.3 0.00 Average point57 57 4,953.6 3,818.0 0.00 Average point58 58 4,933.6 4,008.9 0.00 Average point59 59 4,935.8 4,142.1 0.00 Average point60 60 4,962.4 4,337.5 0.00 Average point61 61 4,995.7 4,523.9 0.00 Average point62 62 5,042.4 4,617.2 0.00 Average point63 63 5,075.7 4,674.9 0.00 Average point64 64 5,162.2 4,732.6 0.00 Average point65 65 5,262.1 4,748.1 0.00 Average point66 66 6,012.4 4,743.7 0.00 Average point67 67 6,687.3 4,748.1 0.00 Average point68 68 6,760.5 4,757.0 0.00 Average point69 69 6,913.7 5,098.9 0.00 St Andrews Dr 40.0 point70 70 6,922.6 5,132.2 0.00 Average point72 72 7,026.9 5,416.3 0.00 Average point73 73 7,035.8 5,496.2 0.00 Average point74 74 6,971.4 5,689.4 0.00 Average C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Horizon Year with Project 219 J INPUT: ROADWAYSThe Farm point75 75 6,878.2 5,778.1 0.00 Average point76 76 6,753.9 5,842.5 0.00 Average point77 77 6,536.3 5,849.2 0.00 Average point78 78 4,891.4 5,824.8 0.00 Average point79 79 4,682.7 5,793.7 0.00 Average point80 80 4,471.9 5,691.6 0.00 Average point81 81 4,318.7 5,556.2 0.00 Average point82 82 4,178.8 5,387.5 0.00 Average point83 83 4,138.9 5,325.3 0.00 Average point84 84 4,078.9 5,163.3 0.00 Average point85 85 4,050.1 5,036.7 0.00 Average point86 86 4,041.2 4,273.1 0.00 Average point87 87 4,014.6 3,542.7 0.00 Average point88 88 4,012.3 2,583.8 0.00 Average point89 89 4,007.9 2,328.5 0.00 Average point90 90 4,005.7 2,146.5 0.00 Average point91 91 3,992.4 2,051.0 0.00 Average point92 92 3,916.9 1,911.2 0.00 Average point93 93 3,834.7 1,824.6 0.00 Average point94 94 3,739.3 1,766.9 0.00 Average point95 95 3,248.7 1,524.9 0.00 Average point96 96 3,084.4 1,462.7 0.00 Average point97 97 3,033.4 1,458.3 0.00 Average point71 71 2,551.7 1,449.4 0.00 Valley Verde Rd S8 50.0 point98 98 2,503.3 907.8 0.00 Average point99 99 2,505.5 1,009.9 0.00 Average point100 100 2,518.8 1,125.3 0.00 Average point101 101 2,518.8 1,229.7 0.00 Average point102 102 2,521.0 1,447.2 0.00 West Espola E10-2 25.0 point103 103 4,949.3 861.1 0.00 Average point9 9 5,541.0 850.9 0.00 Average point10 10 5,957.4 841.9 0.00 Average point11 11 6,489.2 825.7 0.00 Average point12 12 6,871.5 780.6 0.00 Average point13 13 7,105.8 748.2 0.00 Average point14 14 7,484.4 704.9 0.00 Average point15 15 7,515.1 701.3 0.00 East Espola E9 25.0 point104 104 4,939.7 842.5 0.00 Average point105 105 4,217.4 848.5 0.00C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Horizon Year with Project 319 J INPUT: ROADWAYSThe Farm West Espola E9 25.0 point106 106 4,221.3 865.1 0.00 Average point8 8 4,949.3 861.1 0.00 East Espola E7 25.0 point107 107 4,217.4 848.5 0.00 Average point22 22 2,534.3 854.5 0.00 Road E 30.0 point108 108 4,889.3 3,342.8 0.00 Average point110 110 4,685.1 3,417.5 0.00 Average point111 111 4,617.0 3,457.3 0.00 Average point112 112 4,573.9 3,540.4 0.00 Average point113 113 4,578.8 3,621.7 0.00 Average point114 114 4,588.8 3,742.9 0.00 Average point115 115 4,582.2 3,829.3 0.00 Average point116 116 4,540.6 3,952.1 0.00 Average point117 117 4,530.7 4,020.2 0.00 Average point118 118 4,567.2 4,199.5 0.00 Average point119 119 4,632.0 4,344.0 0.00 Average point120 120 4,658.5 4,475.2 0.00 Average point121 121 4,691.7 4,734.2 0.00 Average point122 122 4,748.2 4,820.5 0.00 Average point123 123 4,891.0 4,920.1 0.00 Average point124 124 5,017.2 4,941.7 0.00 Average point125 125 5,561.8 4,955.0 0.00 Average point126 126 5,736.1 5,013.1 0.00 Average point127 127 5,820.8 5,049.6 0.00 Average point128 128 6,406.9 5,048.0 0.00 Average point129 129 6,773.8 4,968.3 0.00 Average point109 109 6,813.7 4,956.7 0.00 Road A 30.0 point130 130 4,148.8 960.2 0.00 Average point132 132 4,163.7 1,391.9 0.00 Average point133 133 4,170.4 1,438.4 0.00 Average point134 134 4,358.0 1,639.3 0.00 Average point135 135 4,446.0 1,733.9 0.00 Average point136 136 4,467.6 2,595.6 0.00 Average point137 137 4,479.2 2,652.1 0.00 Average point138 138 4,542.3 2,738.4 0.00 Average point139 139 4,628.6 2,821.5 0.00 Average point140 140 4,847.8 3,042.3 0.00 Average point141 141 4,905.9 3,131.9 0.00 Average point142 142 4,915.9 3,331.2 0.00 Average point131 131 5,010.5 3,455.7 0.00C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Horizon Year with Project 419 J INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe FarmDudek 19 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h Volumes PROJECT/CONTRACT:The Farm RUN:Horizon Year With Project Roadway PointsNameNameNo.SegmentAutos MTrucks HTrucks Buses Motorcycles VSVSVSVSVSveh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph veh/hr mph West Espola W7 point1 1134735 2835 1435 0 0 0 0 point2 2 East Espola W7 point3 3134735 2835 1435 0 0 0 0 point4 4 West Espola E7 point5 5108835 2235 1135 0 0 0 0 point6 6108835 2235 1135 0 0 0 0 point7 7 East Espola E10 point16 16 944 35 19 35 10 35 0 0 0 0 point17 17 944 35 19 35 10 35 0 0 0 0 point18 18 944 35 19 35 10 35 0 0 0 0 point19 19 944 35 19 35 10 35 0 0 0 0 point20 20 944 35 19 35 10 35 0 0 0 0 point21 21 West Espola Rd E11 point23 23 804 35 17 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point24 24 804 35 17 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point25 25 804 35 17 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point26 26 804 35 17 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point27 27 804 35 17 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point28 28 East Espola Rd E11 point29 29 804 35 17 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point30 30 804 35 17 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point31 31 804 35 17 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point32 32 804 35 17 35 8 35 0 0 0 0C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Horizon Year with Project 1 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe Farm point33 33 804 35 17 35 8 35 0 0 0 0 point34 34 Cloudcroft Dr N10 point35 35 147 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point36 36 147 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point37 37 147 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point38 38 147 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point39 39 CloudCroft Dr N25 point40 40 52 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point41 41 52 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point42 42 52 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point43 43 52 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point44 44 52 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point45 45 52 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point46 46 52 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point47 47 52 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point48 48 52 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point49 49 52 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point50 50 52 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point51 51 52 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point52 52 52 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point53 53 Tam O Shanter N24 point54 54 166 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point55 55 166 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point56 56 166 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point57 57 166 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point58 58 166 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point59 59 166 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point60 60 166 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point61 61 166 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point62 62 166 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point63 63 166 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point64 64 166 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point65 65 166 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point66 66 166 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point67 67 166 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point68 68 166 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Horizon Year with Project 2 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe Farm point69 69 St Andrews Dr point70 70 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point72 72 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point73 73 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point74 74 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point75 75 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point76 76 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point77 77 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point78 78 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point79 79 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point80 80 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point81 81 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point82 82 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point83 83 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point84 84 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point85 85 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point86 86 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point87 87 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point88 88 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point89 89 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point90 90 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point91 91 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point92 92 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point93 93 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point94 94 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point95 95 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point96 96 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point97 97 169 25 3 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point71 71 Valley Verde Rd S8 point98 98 677 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point99 99 677 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point100 100 677 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point101 101 677 35 14 35 7 35 0 0 0 0 point102 102 West Espola E10-2 point103 103 944 35 19 35 10 35 0 0 0 0 point9 9 94435 1935 1035 0 0 0 0C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Horizon Year with Project 3 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe Farm point10 10 944 35 19 35 10 35 0 0 0 0 point11 11 944 35 19 35 10 35 0 0 0 0 point12 12 944 35 19 35 10 35 0 0 0 0 point13 13 944 35 19 35 10 35 0 0 0 0 point14 14 944 35 19 35 10 35 0 0 0 0 point15 15 East Espola E9 point104 104 943 35 19 35 10 35 0 0 0 0 point105 105 West Espola E9 point106 106 943 35 19 35 10 35 0 0 0 0 point8 8 East Espola E7 point107 107 1088 35 22 35 11 35 0 0 0 0 point22 22 Road E point108 108 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point110 110 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point111 111 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point112 112 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point113 113 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point114 114 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point115 115 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point116 116 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point117 117 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point118 118 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point119 119 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point120 120 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point121 121 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point122 122 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point123 123 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point124 124 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point125 125 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point126 126 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point127 127 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point128 128 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point129 129 49 25 1 25 1 25 0 0 0 0 point109 109 Road A point130 130 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point132 132 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Horizon Year with Project 4 INPUT: TRAFFIC FOR LAeq1h VolumesThe Farm point133 133 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point134 134 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point135 135 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point136 136 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point137 137 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point138 138 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point139 139 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point140 140 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point141 141 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point142 142 233 25 5 25 2 25 0 0 0 0 point131 131C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Horizon Year with Project 5 INPUT: RECEIVERSThe FarmDudek 19 June 2019 CB TNM 2.5 INPUT: RECEIVERS PROJECT/CONTRACT:The Farm RUN:Horizon Year With Project ReceiverNameNo.#DUsCoordinates (ground)HeightInput Sound Levels and Criteria ActiveXYZaboveExistingImpact Criteria NRinGroundLAeq1hLAeq1hSub'lGoalCalc.ft ft ft ft dBA dBA dB dB ST1 1 1 4,228.2 801.6 0.00 4.92 64.00 66 10.0 8.0Y ST4 2 1 5,679.8 2,346.1 0.00 4.92 52.50 66 10.0 8.0Y ST2 3 1 4,384.1 3,690.0 0.00 4.92 43.10 66 10.0 8.0Y ST3 4 1 6,696.9 5,901.7 0.00 4.92 42.20 66 10.0 8.0Y C:\TNM25\Projects\The Farm\Horizon Year with Project 1 Appendix D Operation Scenarios - Events at The Barn and The Meadow Prepared by Dudek (Project # 11872)Sample Scenario: Hypothetical "Concert" Venue at The Barn + The Social (two pole-mounted speakers, broadcast to attendance of approx. 300 guests)1/17/2020 041821231642052462873283694104514925335746156566977387798208619029439841025106611071148118912301271131213531394143514761517155815991640168117221763180418451886192719682009205020912132217322141 51 59 51 60 59 52 52 59 52 52 53 60 60 53 53 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 52 62 60 60 60 60 59 59 59 59 59 58 58 58 58 2 58 51 51 52 52 59 52 52 52 53 53 60 53 53 53 61 61 61 61 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 61 61 61 61 61 52 61 60 62 60 60 60 59 61 59 59 59 58 58 58 3 51 51 59 52 52 52 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 54 54 61 61 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 61 61 52 61 61 60 51 60 60 60 59 59 59 59 59 58 58 4 51 52 52 59 52 53 53 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 61 62 62 62 62 62 62 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 61 52 61 61 61 59 60 60 60 59 59 59 59 59 58 5 52 59 52 52 52 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 61 62 62 62 62 62 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 62 62 62 62 62 61 61 52 61 61 52 60 60 60 59 59 59 59 59 6 52 52 52 53 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 54 55 54 62 62 62 63 63 63 63 63 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 63 63 63 63 63 63 62 62 62 62 62 61 52 61 61 52 52 60 60 59 59 59 59 7 53 53 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 54 54 55 55 55 55 63 63 63 63 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 63 63 63 63 63 62 62 62 62 61 52 61 52 60 52 60 60 59 59 59 8 53 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 54 55 55 55 55 55 55 63 63 64 64 64 64 64 64 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64 64 64 64 64 63 63 63 63 62 62 62 53 61 61 52 52 60 51 60 60 59 59 9 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 54 55 55 55 55 56 56 56 65 64 64 64 64 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64 64 64 64 63 63 63 63 62 62 62 53 61 52 52 60 52 60 59 59 10 53 53 54 54 54 54 54 55 55 55 55 56 56 56 56 57 64 64 65 65 65 65 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 65 65 65 65 65 64 64 64 63 63 63 63 62 53 62 53 61 52 52 52 60 60 59 11 53 54 54 54 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 56 56 57 66 57 66 65 65 65 66 66 66 66 66 67 67 67 67 66 66 66 66 66 66 65 65 65 64 64 64 63 63 63 63 54 62 53 53 61 52 52 52 60 60 12 54 54 54 55 55 55 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 66 58 58 58 65 66 66 66 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 66 66 66 65 65 65 64 64 64 63 63 63 54 62 53 53 61 52 52 52 60 60 13 54 54 54 55 55 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 57 58 58 58 58 59 66 67 67 67 67 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 67 67 67 66 66 66 65 65 65 64 64 63 63 54 62 53 53 53 61 52 52 52 52 14 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 56 56 57 57 58 58 58 59 59 59 59 60 67 68 68 68 68 69 69 69 69 69 69 68 68 68 68 67 67 67 66 66 65 65 64 64 64 63 54 63 54 53 53 53 52 52 52 60 15 54 55 55 55 56 56 56 56 57 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 60 60 61 61 68 69 69 69 69 70 70 70 70 69 69 69 69 68 68 67 67 67 66 66 65 65 64 55 64 63 54 54 53 53 53 53 52 52 51 16 55 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 57 58 58 58 59 59 60 60 60 61 61 62 62 69 70 70 70 71 71 71 71 70 70 70 69 69 69 68 68 67 67 66 66 65 65 64 64 55 54 54 62 53 53 53 53 52 52 17 55 55 55 56 56 57 57 57 58 58 58 59 59 60 60 61 61 62 62 63 63 70 71 71 71 72 72 72 72 72 71 71 70 70 69 69 68 68 67 57 66 65 65 65 55 55 63 54 54 53 53 53 53 52 52 18 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 60 60 61 62 62 62 63 64 64 65 72 72 73 73 73 73 73 73 72 72 71 71 70 69 69 68 67 58 66 66 65 56 64 55 55 54 54 54 53 53 53 53 53 19 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 60 61 61 62 62 63 64 64 65 66 66 73 73 74 74 75 75 74 74 74 73 72 71 71 70 69 69 68 58 57 57 66 56 64 55 55 54 54 54 54 53 53 53 53 20 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 61 61 62 63 63 64 65 66 66 67 68 68 75 75 76 76 76 76 76 75 74 73 72 71 71 70 69 59 58 58 57 57 56 65 55 56 55 54 54 54 54 53 53 53 21 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 60 60 61 62 63 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 70 70 77 78 79 79 78 78 77 76 74 73 72 71 61 60 69 59 58 58 66 57 56 56 56 55 54 54 54 54 53 53 52 22 55 64 56 56 65 57 58 59 59 60 61 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 69 70 71 72 72 72 72 80 82 82 82 80 79 77 76 74 73 62 61 60 60 59 58 58 58 57 56 56 56 55 55 54 54 54 54 53 53 23 55 56 56 65 57 58 58 59 59 68 61 62 62 63 74 65 67 69 81 83 73 75 75 74 74 83 84 84 84 83 81 79 77 65 64 62 62 61 61 59 59 58 58 58 57 56 56 56 55 55 54 54 54 53 52 24 55 56 56 56 57 58 58 59 59 60 61 62 63 64 74 76 78 80 83 85 76 ##### ##### ##### ##### ##### 87 88 87 85 83 69 67 65 64 64 62 62 61 60 60 59 58 58 57 56 57 56 55 55 55 55 54 54 53 25 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 59 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 76 78 81 84 ##### ##### ##### ##### ##### ##### ##### 91 94 91 76 73 71 69 67 66 64 63 62 62 61 60 59 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 55 55 55 54 54 54 26 55 56 56 56 57 58 58 59 59 60 61 62 63 64 74 76 79 82 84 ##### 94 ##### ##### ##### ##### 88 94 ##### ##### ##### ##### 73 70 68 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 55 55 55 54 54 54 27 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 59 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 76 78 81 84 ##### 91 94 91 77 ##### 87 91 94 ##### ##### ##### 72 70 68 66 65 63 62 62 61 60 59 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 55 55 55 54 54 54 28 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 60 61 61 62 63 74 76 78 80 83 ##### ##### 88 87 85 86 85 87 88 87 75 ##### 72 69 67 66 64 63 62 62 61 60 59 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 55 55 55 54 54 54 29 55 55 56 65 57 57 58 58 65 68 60 61 62 63 74 75 77 79 81 ##### ##### 85 ##### 84 ##### 84 ##### 85 84 74 73 71 68 67 65 64 63 62 61 61 60 59 59 58 58 57 56 56 56 55 55 55 54 54 54 30 55 63 56 56 65 57 64 58 59 65 60 61 62 63 64 74 76 77 79 80 ##### ##### ##### ##### ##### ##### ##### ##### 82 ##### ##### ##### 68 66 65 63 63 62 61 60 60 59 59 58 58 57 57 56 55 55 55 55 54 54 54 31 55 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 59 59 60 61 61 62 63 64 74 76 77 78 79 80 80 80 80 80 ##### ##### ##### ##### ##### ##### 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 60 60 59 58 58 57 57 57 56 56 55 55 55 54 54 54 32 55 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 60 60 61 62 63 72 73 75 76 77 77 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 77 77 71 70 65 64 63 62 62 61 60 59 59 58 58 58 57 57 56 56 56 55 55 54 54 54 53 33 54 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 61 61 72 73 73 74 75 75 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 75 75 69 69 62 61 62 61 60 60 59 59 58 58 57 56 56 56 56 55 55 55 54 54 54 53 34 54 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 58 65 60 60 61 67 68 73 73 74 74 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 74 74 73 68 61 67 60 61 60 65 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 56 55 55 54 54 54 54 54 53 35 55 55 55 55 56 56 57 57 64 58 65 65 66 66 67 71 72 72 73 73 73 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 73 73 73 68 68 60 66 66 65 65 59 59 64 58 57 57 56 56 55 55 55 54 54 54 53 54 53 36 55 55 55 55 56 56 63 57 57 64 64 65 65 66 66 71 67 71 72 72 72 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 72 72 72 71 71 67 66 66 65 65 64 58 58 57 63 56 56 56 55 55 54 54 54 53 53 53 53 37 54 55 55 55 55 56 56 57 63 64 64 64 65 65 66 66 67 67 68 68 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 71 71 71 66 66 66 65 65 57 64 64 57 57 57 56 56 55 55 55 54 54 54 53 53 53 52 38 54 55 55 55 55 56 56 63 63 63 64 64 65 65 65 66 66 67 67 67 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 70 70 70 69 65 65 64 64 64 56 63 56 56 56 56 55 55 55 54 54 54 53 53 52 52 39 54 54 61 55 56 55 62 62 57 63 63 64 59 65 65 59 66 66 66 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 69 69 59 65 64 58 64 63 56 56 55 56 56 61 54 54 54 54 54 60 59 53 52 52 40 54 54 55 55 55 56 62 56 57 57 57 58 58 64 59 59 59 66 60 67 66 70 60 67 70 67 67 70 69 67 67 69 67 58 58 68 57 57 57 56 56 56 56 62 55 54 54 54 54 53 59 59 59 52 52 41 54 54 55 55 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 57 58 58 58 59 59 59 59 59 60 60 60 60 60 67 67 67 67 67 66 66 66 66 66 57 57 57 56 56 57 57 56 56 55 54 54 54 54 60 59 53 59 59 53 50-55 dBA < 50 dBA Scale: this box = 300 feet> 80 dBA 75-80 dBA 70-75 dBA 65-70 dBA 60-65 dBA 55-60 dBA The Event Barn Lawn Wall The Social Speaker #2The Barn Speaker #1 Crowd Cluster of ~43 Spectators (typical of 7) TheBarn_ops-noise_02_mcs011020 The Farm in Poway - Technical Noise Report - Appendix D 20x20ft_grid; predicted noise levels on a horizontal plane 13' above flat grade Prepared by Dudek (Project # 11872)Sample Scenario: Hypothetical "Outdoor Concert" Venue at The Meadow (two pole-mounted speakers, broadcast to attendance of approx. 300 guests)1/12/2020 039781171561952342733123513904294685075465856246637027417808198588979369751014105310921131117012091248128713261365140414431482152115601599163816771716175517941833187219111950198920281 52 52 52 52 53 53 53 54 54 54 54 55 55 ##### 56 ##### ##### ##### 50 ##### ##### 58 58 59 59 59 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59 59 59 59 59 58 58 58 57 57 57 56 56 56 55 55 55 54 54 2 52 52 52 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 ##### ##### 59 59 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59 59 59 58 58 58 57 57 57 56 56 56 55 55 55 54 3 52 52 52 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 58 58 59 59 59 60 60 60 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 60 60 60 59 59 59 58 58 57 57 57 56 56 56 55 55 54 4 52 52 52 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 57 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 60 60 61 61 61 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 61 61 61 60 60 59 59 59 58 58 57 57 57 56 56 55 55 55 5 52 52 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 57 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 60 61 61 62 62 62 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 62 62 62 61 61 60 60 60 59 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 56 55 55 6 52 52 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 60 61 61 62 62 63 63 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 63 63 63 62 62 61 60 60 59 59 58 58 57 57 57 56 56 55 55 7 52 53 53 53 53 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 57 57 57 58 58 59 60 60 61 61 62 62 63 64 64 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64 64 63 63 62 62 61 60 60 59 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 56 55 8 52 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 60 61 62 62 63 64 65 65 66 66 67 67 67 66 66 66 65 64 64 63 62 62 61 60 60 59 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 55 9 52 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 60 60 61 62 62 63 64 65 66 66 67 68 68 68 68 68 68 67 66 65 64 64 63 62 61 61 60 59 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 55 10 52 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 61 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 70 71 70 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 63 62 61 60 60 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 56 11 52 53 53 53 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 60 60 61 62 62 63 64 65 67 68 69 71 72 73 73 73 72 71 70 69 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 61 60 59 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 12 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 60 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 68 69 71 73 74 76 76 76 75 74 72 70 68 67 66 64 63 62 62 61 60 59 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 13 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 59 59 60 61 61 62 63 64 65 67 69 71 73 75 76 78 79 79 77 76 74 71 69 68 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 60 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 14 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 59 59 60 61 61 62 63 64 66 67 69 72 ##### 76 78 82 85 83 80 77 75 72 70 68 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 60 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 15 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 61 62 62 63 65 66 68 70 72 75 77 80 85 ##### 87 83 79 76 73 70 68 67 65 64 63 62 61 60 60 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 16 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 61 62 62 63 65 66 68 70 72 ##### 77 79 83 87 ##### 85 79 76 73 71 68 67 65 64 63 62 61 60 60 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 17 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 59 59 60 61 62 62 63 65 66 68 69 72 74 76 78 80 83 85 82 78 76 73 70 68 67 65 64 63 62 61 60 60 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 18 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 59 59 60 61 61 62 63 64 66 67 69 72 ##### 75 ##### 78 79 80 78 76 74 72 70 68 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 60 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 19 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 60 60 61 62 63 64 65 67 68 70 72 73 75 76 77 77 76 75 ##### ##### ##### ##### ##### ##### 63 63 62 61 60 59 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 20 53 53 53 53 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 60 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 69 70 72 ##### 74 ##### 75 ##### 73 ##### 69 68 66 65 64 63 62 61 61 60 59 59 58 57 57 56 56 56 21 52 53 53 53 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 61 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 69 70 72 72 72 72 72 71 ##### 68 ##### ##### ##### 63 63 62 61 60 60 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 55 22 52 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 59 59 60 60 61 62 63 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 69 70 70 69 69 ##### 67 ##### ##### ##### 55 54 61 61 60 59 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 55 23 52 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 61 61 62 63 63 64 65 66 67 67 68 68 68 67 67 ##### 65 65 56 55 54 54 53 57 60 59 59 58 57 57 57 56 56 55 24 52 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 60 61 61 62 63 63 64 65 65 66 66 66 66 66 65 ##### 64 64 56 55 54 53 53 52 51 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 55 55 25 52 52 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 60 61 61 62 63 63 64 64 64 65 65 65 64 64 64 63 63 62 55 54 53 52 52 51 51 55 57 57 57 56 56 55 55 26 52 52 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 57 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 60 61 61 62 62 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 62 62 62 61 53 53 52 52 51 50 50 49 57 56 56 55 55 55 27 52 52 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 58 58 59 59 60 60 61 61 61 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 ##### ##### ##### 60 52 ##### ##### ##### 50 50 49 48 53 53 55 55 55 28 52 52 52 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 58 58 59 59 60 60 60 61 61 61 61 62 62 62 61 61 61 61 ##### ##### ##### 52 56 ##### ##### ##### 50 49 49 48 48 47 52 55 54 29 52 52 52 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 57 57 57 58 58 58 59 59 59 60 60 60 60 61 61 61 61 61 61 60 60 53 52 52 51 56 50 51 50 50 50 49 48 48 47 47 52 54 30 52 52 52 52 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 57 58 58 58 59 59 59 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59 52 51 51 51 58 50 50 50 49 49 48 47 47 47 46 46 31 51 52 52 52 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 57 57 58 58 58 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 52 51 50 50 50 54 49 49 49 49 48 48 47 46 46 46 32 51 52 52 52 52 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 56 56 57 57 57 58 58 58 58 58 58 59 59 59 59 59 59 58 58 58 58 51 50 50 49 49 48 49 48 48 48 48 47 46 46 46 33 51 51 52 52 52 52 53 53 53 54 54 54 54 55 55 55 56 56 56 56 57 57 57 57 57 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 57 51 50 49 49 49 56 47 48 48 48 47 47 47 46 45 34 51 51 52 52 52 52 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 54 55 55 55 55 56 56 56 56 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 58 58 57 57 57 57 57 57 54 50 49 49 48 48 55 47 48 47 47 47 47 46 45 35 51 51 51 52 52 52 52 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 54 55 55 55 55 56 56 56 56 56 56 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 56 56 49 49 49 48 48 53 52 47 47 47 47 46 46 46 36 51 51 51 51 52 52 52 52 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 54 55 55 55 55 55 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 57 57 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 49 49 48 48 47 47 52 46 47 46 46 46 46 46 37 51 51 51 51 52 52 52 52 52 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 54 54 55 55 55 55 55 55 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 55 53 48 48 48 47 47 47 54 51 46 46 46 46 45 38 50 51 51 51 51 52 52 52 52 52 53 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 54 54 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 56 56 56 56 56 56 55 55 55 55 55 55 48 48 48 47 47 46 46 45 45 46 45 45 45 39 50 51 51 51 51 51 52 52 52 52 52 53 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 54 54 54 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 52 48 47 47 47 46 46 53 50 45 45 45 45 75-80 dBA 70-75 dBA < 50 dBA65-70 dBA 60-65 dBA 55-60 dBA 50-55 dBA Scale: this box = 300 feet> 80 dBA Speaker #2Speaker #1 Crowd Cluster of ~43 Spectators (typical of 7) Onsite Residential Privacy/ Noise Wall (8' tall) Planned New Onsite "Meadow" Residential Home (typical of six shown) TheMeadow_ops-noise_01_mcs011020 The Farm in Poway - Technical Noise Report - Appendix D 20x20ft_grid; predicted noise levels on a horizontal plane 13' above flat grade