Item 2 - Pre-Application for GPA 86-02AGENDA REPORTr�'
CITY OF POWAY
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James L. Bowersox, City Mana
INITIATED BY: Reba W. Touw, Director of Plan ing Services
James R. Nessel, Associate Planner p%
Sharon E. Crockett, Assistant Planner
DATE: May 22, 1986
SUBJECT: Pre - Applications for GPA 86 -02
BACKGROUND
On January 8, 1985 the City Council adopted a resolution providing
for review of pre - applications for general plan amendments
beginning on the first available Thursday workshop in May or as
soon thereafter as possible. The purpose of this review is to
allow the proponent of the pre - application and Staff to ascertain
the Council's level of interest in the request. That review is
considered advisory only and, if an applicant wishes to proceed,
the formal application must be submitted by July 4, 1986 for con-
sideration at a public hearing in September.
Staff received 13 pre - applications and those have been divided into
two groups. Six of the requests will be reviewed today. The
remaining seven are scheduled for the May 22, 1986 workshop. With
each of the pre- applications, Staff has included certain maps and
other information to assist the City Council in their review.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council review each of the six pre -
applications contained within this report.
Attachments:
1.
P -GPA
86 -02A
2.
P -GPA
86 -02C
3.
P -GPA
86 -02D
4.
P -GPA
86 -021
5. P -GPA 86 -02K
6. P -GPA 86 -02L
7. P -GPA 86 -02M
86 -02A - Concurred the present PS -4 - -is = consistent & should not,be changed.
ACTION: 86 -02C - Concurred the request is premature, Midland Rd. has not been alic
86 -02D - Concurred the present designation is good, & neighbors have not been -in -favor
increased density in the past.
86 -02J - Concurred increased density not warranted because of steep terrain.
86 -02K - No land use changes considered until another access to Garden Rd. area availak
86 -02L - Present zoning compatible & should not be changed. MAY 2 2 1986 IT E M 2
$6 -02M - Prior to chanaina to PC. exact nlan nPP(9Pd with nPi abbnnG ;;nn= nrr �l vm
W - -
, Deputy City
SUBJECT: Pre - Application, General Plan Amendment 86 -02A
OWNER /APPLICANT: Claudia M. Serra
LOCATION: South side of Twin Peaks Road approximately 280
feet west of Espola Road
APN:
321- 190 -28
PARCEL SIZE: 2.15 gross acres
ABSTRACT
Current Land Use Plan: Residential Single Family 4 (3 -4
du /net acre)
Current Zoning Plan:
Requested Land Use Plan:
Requested Zoning Plan:
BACKGROUND
RS -4
Residential Condominium (7 -12
du /net acre)
RC
This application requests the redesignation of a 2.15 acre site on
the south side of Twin Peaks Road. The property is undeveloped and
has a slope of zero to five percent. According to current
floodplain mapping, the property is not within the 100 year
floodplain level of Rattlesnake Creek.
The zoning designations and land uses of the surrounding parcels
are as follows: To the north and west, the properties are under
the same designation as the subject site (RS -4); to the north of
the site, across Twin Peaks Road, the properties are partially
developed with single family dwelling units (Tentative Tract Map
95 -01, QUATE, is directly north of the site); to the west, the pro-
perty is developed as Poway Christian Church; to the east, the pro-
perty is zoned Commerical Neighborhood and is developed with the
Twin Peaks Village Center and a Circle K convenience market; and,
to the south the property is split -zoned RR -C and RS -4 and is deve-
loped as the North County Indoor /Outdoor Soccer Park. The zone
boundary to the south is established at the northerly floodplain
boundary of Rattlesnake Creek. The pre -1983 County land use
designation for the subject property was five (5) Residential- 4.3
du /acre.
JRN:pn
Attachments:
la. Location Map
lb. Letter of Request
lc. Agreement of Understanding
ATTACHMENT: 1
2 OF 44 =�
P -GPA ss� o aA MAY 2 2 1986 ITEM 2
a
I i
ScGUNCC CT
Q
0
k
QJ
lL
LU
l�
iol
i
a
U
C
DAD
ITEM: P GPA 86 -07-A
TITLE : I- CC-47 -16 I MAP
ATTACHMENT: I Q'-
4 3 pF 4 4' L7A !6 -02A MAY 2 2 1986 I T E M 2
29 Illinois Avenue
South Gate, California 90280
General Flan Am_mendment
Ci ter of noway
P. 0. 1s0 >- 78^
Poway, California ^2064
Attention -oar ici'nT, Derar "Ument
v
REE1V
C1.TY 0I P0't!VAY
PLANN
�nuiec,, = Or•�rt Tai -'arcel X21 -1 � -' 14 -DOCK
T\,v „KJ f zAj"s 2�
2.15 a=s
peaks Toad and :Ispola _ oaa
The subject rrorertJ's current z o r i i n i s -3-! as ? !fir t ?10 car re:^ t
General ?lar =es_"natioi-. =rese' land_ _.se no -e. Tnis �^ °cel is
c0,1.mletel-,. "Level and oinl�r 10;0 of it is in t e fl o0i, a fac ,`1a1 ac-
cording r• e = lan i Departmen+ A'ould n0+ affect tine deve_O Dent, of
it. J
Tr1e parcels surroundin- the subject property are developea as follows
Parcel ;129 nas a Food Store with a Self -Serve gas pump.
Parcel s {Y has a commercial- center T%,in Peaks .Tillage Certer.
carCel 31 'nas Jeep developed int0 a ;Ort'' X01 ?nt� IndOOr /i;i -tdoor
arcei - i is the Poway ("hr-ist tan Ce'_ te-1— :SSe -q .111, Dl - Oa.
rJhen T pUrC ,as- t-iis property, t!7° zO 12n fOr tae area
orth Count'. T—,—door/Outdoor SOC ✓er Ce:7tervis located, was zoned for
residential, since then, evidently the zon= was chanve''.
The present zoning on my property calls for lots of 10,000 square feet
at least, which means that the homes would have to be large and expensive.
The socker field in back of it does not enhance or Mould enhance the value
of these homes since there would be noise and lots of activit;, which is
not desirable for a nice residential development. The homes in the area,
within 500 feet or less are priced upward from ;130,00 to .$200,000 plus.
I would liKe for the Planning Department to consider a re- zoning of
this parcel for condominiums. I believe that some very well built and
well designed condominiums with a reasonable square footage, private
garages, swim -ming pool, etc. and nicely lanscaped would be suitable and
compatible with the homes in the area. If this rezoning takes effect,
as I hope it will, included in the CCRE's would be included a reasonable
amount of square footage and other requirements which would make this
development very desirable and enhance the area instead of detracting
from It.
Your consideration to my application will be very much appreciated,
1�4�u/
Claudia I'. Serra
._4. OF 4 4
a
[P -GPA s6 -oaA MAY 22 1986_ ITEM 2
1
lgff ACIIA46V 7- , -14
AGREEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING
City Counc'i f the y of Po ay, e einafter referred to as
"City" and <' , hereinafter
referred to as "Proponent" enter into this Agreement of Understanding
based upon the following facts:
Proponent owns or has an equitable interest in land described by
tax assessor's parcel number(s ) ?21- 190_20)
Proponent desires to amend the General Plan for this property in .
accordance with the will of the City and without the expense of a
protracted process.
City is concerned that Proponent will Crete a General Plan
Amendment proposal unsatisfactory to City and consume time and
effort of City employees needlessly on an unsatisfactory proposal
unless City assists in directing Proponent.
Based upon the above - mentioned facts, City will grant Proponent a
review prior to filing any application for General Plan Amendment
upon the following understanding:
A. City will render no decision with regards to any General
Plan Amendment or part thereof.
B. City will receive no evidence, specific in nature, in
support of a particualr General Plan Amendment.
C. City will make no representations that will obligate the
City to render a decision in favor of or against any General
Plan Amendment or part thereof Proponent may subsequently
submit.
D. If any General Plan Amendment is subsequently submitted,
Proponent will proceed at its sole and exclusive risk with
the understanding that City has made no representations upon
which Proponent may rely.
Dated : ' i� %��f l� l �f %�. proponent
Signature
CITY
Pi ,,ill
P -GPA 86 -02A � MAY 2 2 1986 ITEM 2
OF44
fiTTf}Gt/MFT— ` 1 6
SUBJECT:
OWNER /APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
APN:
PARCEL SIZE:
ABSTRACT
Pre - Application, General Plan Amendment 86 -02C
A. Frederick Rodgers and Burl L. Young
South of Poway Road and immediately west of the
terminus of Glengate Place
317- 664 -22 and 23
1.77 acres and 1.20
Current Land Use Plan:
Current Zoning Plan:
Requested Land Use Plan:
Requested Zoning Plan:
BACKGROUND
acres, respectively
Residential Rural C (1 du /1, 2,
or 4 net acres)
"1m e]
Residential Single Family 5 (4 -7
du /net acre)
RS -7
This application requests the redesignation of a site which con-
sists of two (2) contiguous parcels. Parcel 1, a 1.77 gross acre
site, is developed with a single family dwelling unit and accessory
structures. Parcel 2, a 1.20 gross acre site, is also developed
with a single family dwelling unit. The site is designated RR -C,
is outside of the floodplain of Poway Creek, and has a grade of
less than 10 percent which slopes northerly towards Poway Creek.
The zoning designation and the land uses of the surrounding proper-
ties are as follows: To the north and east of the site the proper-
ties are zoned RS -7 and developed with single family dwelling
units; to the west the property is zoned RR -C and is undeveloped;
and to the south the property is presently vacant, is within the
boundaries of the adopted South Poway Planned Community development
plan, and is designated RR -A. The pre -1983 County land use
designation for the subject site was one (1) Residential - 1 du /1, 2,
and 4 acres.
In the future the subject parcels may be impacted by the extension
of Midland Road and the construction of Poway Creek Road.
JRN:pn
Attachments:
2a. Location Map
2b. Letter of Request
2c. South Poway Planned Community Map
2d. Agreement of Understanding
ATTACHMENT: 2
6 -0F 4 4 P -GPA 86 -02C MAY 2 2 1986 ITEM 2
Q
c
cc cc
0
PMAIA y
l00
(5 SCALE : N1A
ITEM :
-6P,4 84 -OZ G
TITLE : GOCftTiO'y / "f
ATTACHMENT :
"071)F44 P -GPA 86 -02C MAY 2 2 1986 1 T E M 2
- 7
A. Frederick Rodgers
12956 Christman bane
Poway, CA 92064'
April 3, 1986
City Council
city of Poway
13325 Civic Center Drive
Poway, CA 92064
RE: Pre - General Plan Amendment Application
My neighbor, Burl Z. Young, and I are asking the city council
to consider re- zoning our adjacent properties from RRC to RS7.
At the present time the properties are both single family
residences. They are bounded on the north and east by
existing RS7 development. To the west and south the land is
undeveloped. The somewhat rural atmosphere that we now enjoy
will be disrupted by the extension of Midland Road and the
proposed construction of Poway creek Road shown in the Poway
General Plan. These roads will provide a distinct division
between the undeveloped land and our properties.
Re- zoning our properties to RS7 would be a natural extension
of the adjacent developed neighborhood. After re- zoning,
these parcels could be split and developed into several
single family homes compatible with the community character.
The local area would then be unified in a consistent land use,
separated from other zones by boundaries such as busy roadways.
As part of our initial submittal we have reviewed the Poway
Comprehensive Plan with John Bridges of your staff. More
detailed site design studies will be undertaken as required
for General Plan amendment submittal requirements.
We appreciate the opportunity to receive the Council's response
to this zoning amendment. I will be in attendance at the City
Council Workshop to answer any questions.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
lee
A. Frederick Rodgef's
) `n C
CITY OF poo ,Ay
PLANT :i)N' ----..
BOF44 P -CPA a6 -o ac. MAY 22 1986 ITEM � � '
ROAD
--FF
p
CREEK
]ralq 9 mm 9 vim
RMI
'IqRC
V
a:
4W
4k 7--
co
lira os
.................
z,e -r-
(3 SCALE :
VV-44 -
ITEM . )0-6PA 84-0?—C-
5oarH RoulA Y- fZAAmAw
TITLE : cO'0'WJ-v1rr MAP
"IIA- — — -- - ATTACHMENT ZC-
P-GPA "-"C AlAY 2 2 1986 IT F M 2
-6
s i
AGREEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING
City Council for the City of Poway, hereinafter referred to as
"City" and Burl Z. Young , hereinafter
referred to as "Proponent" enter into this Agreement of Understanding
based upon the following facts:
Proponent owns or has an equitable interest in land described by
tax assessor's parcel number(s) 317- 664 -22
.
Proponent desires to amend the General Plan for this property in
accordance with the will of the City and without the expense of a
protracted process.
City is concerned that Proponent will create a General Plan
Amendment proposal unsatisfactory to City and consume time and
effort of City employees needlessly on an unsatisfactory proposal
unless City assists in directing Proponent.
Based upon the above - mentioned facts, City will grant Proponent a
review prior to filing any application for General Plan Amendment
upon the following understanding:
A. City will render no decision with regards to any General
Plan Amendment or part thereof.
B. City will receive no evidence, specific in nature, in
support of a particualr General Plan Amendment.
C. City will make no representations that will obligate the
City to render a decision in favor of or against any General
Plan Amendment or part thereof Proponent may subsequently
submit.
D. If any General Plan Amendment is subsequently submitted,
Proponent will proceed at its sole and exclusive risk with
the understanding that City has made no representations upon
which Proponent may rely.
Dated: 3 3 1 - 6 Proponent:
Signature
I®.0F 4 4
LP -GPA 86 -02C MAY 2 2 1986 IT E M Z
11IMcN�4�r- -.µ Zd: �
AGREEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING
City Council for the Cit of Poway, hereinafter referred to as
"City" and A. Frederick Rodgers gers , hereinafter
referred to as "Proponent" enter into this Agreement of Understanding
based upon the following facts:
Proponent owns or has an equitable interest in land described by
tax assessor's parcel number(s) 317- 664 -23
Proponent desires to amend the General Plan for this property in
accordance with the will of the City and without the expense of a
protracted process.
City is concerned that Proponent will create a General Plan
Amendment proposal unsatisfactory to City and consume time and
effort of City employees needlessly on an unsatisfactory proposal
unless City assists in directing Proponent.
Based upon the above - mentioned facts, City will grant Proponent a
review prior to filing any application for General Plan Amendment
upon the following understanding:
A. City will render no decision with regards to any General
Plan Amendment or part thereof.
B. City will receive no evidence, specific in nature, in
support of a particualr General Plan Amendment.
C. City will make no representations that will obligate the
City to render a decision in favor of or against any General
Plan Amendment or part thereof Proponent may subsequently
submit.
D. If any General Plan Amendment is subsequently submitted,
Proponent will proceed at its sole and exclusive risk with
the understanding that City has made no representations upon
which Proponent may rely.
Dated: CvL �� �� Proponent:
Signature
E11 �F' P -GPA 86-0,2-C MAY 2 2 1996 1 T�E M 2
Ari�C��i _• 2�!
9 •
SUBJECT: Pre - Application, General Plan Amendment 86 -02D
OWNER /APPLICANT: John Visconsi
LOCATION: Southeast quadrant of Pomerado Road and Stone
Canyon Road
APN: 275 -232 -1 thru 6, and 36
PARCEL SIZE: Total area of involved parcels - approximately
4.50 gross acres
ABSTRACT
Current Land Use Plan: Residential Single Family 4 (3 -4
du /net acre)
Current Zoning Plan:
Requested Land Use Plan:
Requested Zoning Plan:
BACKGROUND
RS -4
Residential Senior Citizen and
Commercial Office
RSC and CO
This application requests the redesignation of a site which is
comprised of seven contiguous parcels located on the south side of
Stone Canyon Road between Pomerado Road and Country Squire Drive.
Pomerado Road represents the physical boundary between the subject
area and the City of San Diego to the west. The area in question
is presently developed with three single family residences and one
duplex unit. The subject area has a grade of less than 15 percent
which slopes from east to west towards Pomerado Road.
The properties to the north, across Stone Canyon Road, are
designated Residential Single Family 2 (1 -2 du /net acre) and are
occupied by single- family residences. The land to the east and
south is zoned RS -4. The easterly parcels, across Country Squire
Drive, are developed with a residential subdivision. The two par-
cels to the immediate south, from west to east, are vacant and
occupied by a single family dwelling unit, respectively. The area
to the west, across Pomerado Road, is commercially zoned in the
City of San Diego and developed with Ralph's Market shopping
center. The pre -1983 County land use designation for the subject
site was three (3) Residential - 2 du /acre.
It should be noted that the requested zoning is preliminary only,
since the applicant has indicated in his letter of request that
several development options will be presented at the pre -
application hearing.
JRN:pn
Attachments:
3a. Location Map
3b. Letter of Request _
3c. Topographic Contour Map IP -GPA 86 -02D MAY 2 2 1986 ITEM 2
3d. Agreement of Understandi —_ ____i
2 OF 4 4 ATTACHMENT: 3
n'0<,t
STOPSIE-®CAt lYDKj ROAp
suBi ECT AR40I
u
FartNAA." Cr.
COAL H MAKi CT.
�gRDU
PARK ? :�
A,
6 S +
G
A�
Ur' I�+Y OF POWAY ITEBi : P -GPA 69-07-D
(a SCALE
N,
TITLE : LoCA77,0A/ "Al'
- A- T- TACHMENT : -3 a'-
,;,P -GPA 86-=02D � MAY 22 1986 ITEM 2
JI
ohn visconsi, CSM
12 92 5 ALra Drive
San Diego, California 92128
(619) 451 -1415
April 3, 1986
RE: City of Poway
General Plan Amendment Pre- application
City council:
I would like to change four (4) acres of the current RS4
zoning to a higher density residential and one -half (1/2)
acre for general office use. I feel that the highest and
best use for this site may be a combination of smaller
housing dwellings (i.e., senior villa's) with some
limited office use.
During the next month, I plan to meet with all the
neighbors within 500' of this site. I would like to hear
their likes and dislikes and prepare a new mixed use plan
based upon this input and complimentary to the neighborhood.
At the pre - application hearing, I plan to present several
development options for this site to Council.
Very truly yours,
LV
John Visconsi
cc: Oscar Swartz
a 124'0-F 4 4,
RECEIVED
APR ° 4 nvd6
PLANNING DEPARTMM
U k �'.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
c 86 - - -02D MqY 22 1986 ITEM 2
417;Vc111'f6t1,_:r ,6.
f
AGREEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING
City Council for the Cit of Poway, hereinafter referred to as
"City" and �6s re-,A1 i , hereinafter
referred to as "Proponent" enter into this Agreement of Understanding
based upon the following facts:
Proponent owns or has an equitable interest in land described by
tax assessor's parcel number(s) Z7$2.32- U.3.4-0 5.6 836
Proponent desires to amend the General Plan for this property in
accordance with the will of the City and without the expense of a
protracted process.
City is concerned that Proponent will create a General Plan
Amendment proposal unsatisfactory to City and consume time and
effort of City employees needlessly on an unsatisfactory proposal
unless City assists in directing Proponent.
Based upon the above - mentioned facts, City will grant Proponent a
review prior to filing any application for General Plan Amendment
upon the following understandings
A. City will render no decision with regards to any General
Plan Amendment or part thereof.
B. City will receive no evidence, specific in nature, in
support of a particualr General Plan Amendment.
C. City will make no representations that will obligate the
City to render a decision in favor of or against any General
Plan Amendment or part thereof Proponent may subsequently
submit.
D. If any General Plan Amendment is subsequently submitted,
Proponent will proceed at its sole and exclusive risk with
the understanding that City has made no representations upon
which Proponent may rely.
Dated: Proponent:
Sig ature
FP GPA 86 -02D I MAY 2 2 1986 IT E M 2
SUBJECT:
OWNER /APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
APN:
PARCEL SIZE:
nucmunOT
Pre- Application, General Plan Amendment 86 -02J
Graybill Medical Clinic /Michael Hogan
Approximately 3,300 feet south of Poway Grade
and 1,300 feet north of Sycamore Canyon Road
321 - 270 -55 (Old APN: 321 - 271 -04, 40.85 Acres)
43.21 Gross Acres
Current Land Use Plan:
Current Zoninq Plan:
Requested Land Use Plan:
Requested Zoning Plan:
BACKGROUND
Residential Rural A (1 du /4, 8,
20, or 40 net acres)
RR -A
Residential Rural B (1 du /2, 4,
or 8 net acres)
RR -B
This application involves a vacant parcel of land located to the
south of Poway Grade and to the north of the easterly terminus of
Sycamore Canyon Road. The northern one half of the parcel consists
of terrain that ranges from zero to over 30 percent slope. The
southern portion of the parcel exceeds 30 percent grade and slopes
to the south towards Los Penasquitos Creek, a tributary to Poway
Creek. An existing private access road easement, Blue Crystal
Trails, terminates at the parcel's northerly property line.
Adjacent properties to the west, north, and east are designated
RR -A. The two large parcels to the west are each occupied by a
single family residence. Properties adjoining on the north and
east are presently vacant. The property to the south is designated
Planned Residential Development (PRD). That property, while pre-
sently undeveloped, has an approved tentative subdivision map
(TTM 83 -02, Kuebler - PRD). The pre -1983 County land use designa-
tion for the subject site was (18) Multiple Rural - 1 du /4, 8, 20
and 40 acres.
JRN:is
Attachments:
4a. Location Map
4b. Letter of Request
4c. Topographic Contour Map
4d. Agreement of Understanding
ATTACHMENT: 4
1'27' _�F 4
L P -GPA 86 -02J MAY 2 2 1986 1 T E M 2
• •
GRAY, CARY, AM ES & FRYE
GORDON GRAY (1877 1967) ATTORNEYS AT LAW OTHER OFFICES
W P CARY(1882 1943) 1200 PROSPECT STREET SUITE 575 IN
WALTER AMES(1893 1980) SAN DIEGO
FRANK A FRYE(1904 1970) LA JOLLA CALIFORNIA 92037 EL CENTRO
TEL E PH ONE E619] 454 -9101
April 4, 1986
Mrs. Reba Touw
RECEIVE®
Planning Director APR -4 ft0
City of Poway
13202 Poway Road PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Poway, CA 92064
Re: General Plan Amendment Pre- Application
A.P N. 321- 271 -04
Owner: Gravbill Medical Clinic
Dear Mrs. Touw:
This firm represents the Graybill Medical
Clinic, which has requested our assistance in obtaining
a general plan amendment concerning the above property.
Please consider this letter as the pre - application
for a general plan amendment on behalf of Graybill
Medical Clinic.
THE PROPERTY
A site plan of the subject property is attached
as Exhibit "A ". The property consists of approximately
40 acres of undeveloped land, located near the water
tank southeast of the intersection of Millards Road
and Poway Road. The property is more fully described
as follows. The southeast quarter of the southeast
quarter of Section 8, Township South, Range West, S.B B.M.,
in the County of San Diego, State of California, according
to United States Government Survey.
Access to the property is by two separately
located private road easements. The property has more
than sufficient water service. It is within Assessment
District 79 -1 and has been assessed for and allotted
a minimum water use far in excess of that needed to
serve future development.
CURRENT GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION
The property currently is designated in the
general plan and classified in the zoning ordinance
as Rural Residential A (RRA).
P-GPA 86 -02J j MAY 2 2 1986 ITEM 2
il 9 VF 4 4 Orr, 4cHrh5vr-__ 4-b.
GRAY CARY AMES & FRYE
Mrs Reba Touw
Page #2
April 4, 1986
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUESTED
The applicant seeks an amendment to the general
plan to redesignate the property to Rural Residential B
(RRB).
REASONS FOR AMENDMENT
The applicant seeks redesignation of the
property from RRA to RRB to permit future subdivision
of the property into four lots for residential purposes
The amendment would be consistent with good planning
for the property and the City for several reasons
First, the property was identified as suitable
for future residential development when it was included
within Assessment District 79 -1. The property has
been assessed for and allotted 43,400 gallons of water
per day (15,841,000 gallons per year). According to
the ground water policy of the City of Poway set forth
in Resolution No 294, the minimum lot size of residential
development is established by water usage based upon
326,000 gallons per dwelling unit. According to this
standard, the property has been assessed for and allotted
water sufficient to service development far more intensive
than the four dwelling units the general plan amendment
requested would allow (See Exhibit "B ").
Assessment District 79 -1 was organized to
install a water tank to provide water to make the serviced
area developable. Since the time the district was
organized, there has been no change to the property
other than the actual installation of the water tank.
An amendment allowing subdivision of the property into
lots for four dwelling units is good planning in that
it would provide for limited future residential development
of property which otherwise has more than nine times
greater water assessment and allotment than needed
to support the requested amendment.
Second, the requested amendment would allow
for future development of the property in a manner
consistent with surrounding parcels. Several of the
parcels nearby already have been developed for residential
use. Many other surrounding parcels are of substantially
smaller acreage than the average lot size of approximately
eight acres which would result if the property were
subdivided into four lots. (See Exhibit "C ").
l P -GPA 86 -021 MAY 2 2 1986 ITEM
E M
D-a -F 44 2
® 0
GRAY CARY AMES & FRYE
Mrs. Reba Touw
Page #3
April 4, 1986
Third, granting the general plan designation
to support subdivision into four lots will reduce the
future risk of fire hazards by the availability of
water facilities serving the lots. An additional benefit
to the City is the increased tax base which will result
from the future limited residential development.
This application for an amendment to the
general plan is intended to allow a general plan designation
and zoning classification sufficient to permit subdivision
of the property into four residential lots. The requested
amendment is consistent with good planning on the part
of the City, which already has assessed the property
and allotted more than adequate water to make the property
developable. Any development as a result of the amendment
would have more than enough water, sufficient access
and would be limited to large lot sizes consistent
with the surrounding area.
For the foregoing reasons, Graybill Medical
Clinic respectfully requests that the general plan
amendment be granted If additional information would
be helpful, please feel free to contact me. Thank
you for your consideration.
Very truly yours,
Michael M. Hogan
For
GRAY, CARY, AMES & FRYE
MMH:ie
cc* Mr. Les Bietz
Mr. Michael Wunderlin
Mr. Jay Gelb
OF P-GPA 86 -02J MAY 2 2 1986 ITEM 2
O E!
2
n
r
A
D
Ni Iti
>
i
P
Exhibit "A"
s +
n
O
y I
°
+ Y
�{ :mom '� ►
a! m�
� s^
O ° b
°
w °
o�
e
b�
o..
v+
a,
°
b
N f.
s s
o a
H
.- -k —I�h —�
p_GpA '-0 23 19
t!j
Et
Ot
e�
6 E Mjl 2
s
m
Z
2
0
O
Z IN 3
jo Z�
n
r
9° JiOn_
�O
m
—7-7 Allicamom,
y
B
t� ti
N
O
Soo
I
/
O
O
--
�
O
0
D
R
�
4
—
n A`
o /
r•_ t�
_
'
3
A n
rKzv
� ^
M M ti
Ni Iti
>
i
P
Exhibit "A"
s +
n
O
y I
°
+ Y
�{ :mom '� ►
a! m�
� s^
O ° b
°
w °
o�
e
b�
o..
v+
a,
°
b
N f.
s s
o a
H
.- -k —I�h —�
p_GpA '-0 23 19
t!j
Et
Ot
e�
6 E Mjl 2
s
m
Z
2
0
O
N
W 31 i sesL z z Ae6
.7
N NNN NNN✓ r ✓--✓ ✓ ✓rr ✓ r ✓r ✓✓ r ✓✓ 1p m V V O1 u• A W N.
V 01 1.I I A r✓ O b O m m V p 1 T V f A W W W W N✓ .+ r O 1 1
N r W N r N r A W N r A W N r
w 2 W W W W 2 1 a W 1.1 1.1 w 1• I l J W W W w W W W W W.
N O O N N N N [r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O N N N N N N N n
♦"' "1 --1r r-+ir ✓.••- i ✓r ✓ ✓ ✓r✓ W rr ✓r ✓r ✓ ✓rr ✓.-- � ✓ ✓ ✓....r ✓r...
1 1 1 �1 po
V N V1 V V vl V V m V1 V V v V V V V OV V V V V V V V V V O1 V 111 O O O 'J O m O m
O ovrny i •; ; 01"•1 17000000 � � ; r ; ✓✓ 1 ; ; O � ('700000000
I I Q Q I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
W O OppZr ✓01 A AAA A A pNNNN
Y f O ✓✓✓ r••NO W W W O W T 171 f.11
W N W V I A W N m V O\ N m A W N N %D m V D 1 V V 7 %0 4.n D 1 171 v N O m
.� r ^
N C'1'o SSc 0 r- r- a0=;1 r_ DSG7 FA -0 V NVf3S<010.
< 01 & o -1 c c c O c c c W w c c G N n i}i d_ O b d O d N O d d
f0 b d: b m 9 O �q -•1 r N N N b d r♦ 10 10 r10 /b A A
+ 7 0 , n n -•1 �1 -w O. N N M R• J J c c r -� t + d > > Ib IT I+ , .?.
11 N /b • � d d O � � 3 d R' 7C R' f9 N N b + IC -+� Q O S /D (D � n
IB ���o ddzlblbA. reANramo +-•/b -- .,nrb "I —�
M -• 7 7 0 r g ++ p r N o O vC 3 IC 0 d -.Ip e
i x >> 30l010 O t000d
b 100 7 A /D 0 7 ? 0 0 A
' N L3 -•1 A
10 ~ r
n c
Go
N O O• a
�• N c N IA
< <
A
01
171 W W Ar N a Ar r r r N w A r NVI OI r
:-!-4 NQO W 40 r NN m m A V O W m 10 10 m✓ m VIA N W 01 ✓.-� p r r pw
Om ION VIN 010 OVIpW 0mN00aa V 0 w m vl A OW wNw W w Ow A
10 10 r A m A r r O N 010 V VIN ✓ 1• I I C 1 O I V W r C 1 W
w a
D N r N. r N r N ✓ r✓ r r r N= w W N N A w A N A✓ r Ir N N w N N w N
< A N w C I N m 1 D 10 1 D m N m ID m 0 V N m A w N ON w m V O W A r V I V V 7 1 D w t r
G% W 01 10 2O VI d V 1C W W (P N lT N m A m A CI io to C1 N N VI V W A N N A a u p
r+CD O ID fV W W m V Ln m N O 10 W O A W ul m W OI m V V1 r Ip O A No .•+ A O a m
M W
Drl r r r r r r: r r ✓✓ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r
<O V Nm'.r W ✓N NW r W r NNm"NO NN1Drr W 1Dr tD W N01D 1D00
O a 01 w V 1 C .-+ Ch Lm ✓ V 1-+ V I V O 1 ✓ O V I W O 1 C m m 1 O m✓ N r- V+ O v W
v r N N a 10 W O O A W ON W r y I W O 1 1 J I✓ V V 10 A A m W A C% N W r V L" I W O
M
M
W
O 0l/nmr ✓.+ Nr+to �i-. p.... Nv1 W r••i+t7/ V101 p.000%n AA1D N 17110 AVI
N W "o. C) 01O m A1./I0 C1mNm0AW m V 10 m1010 W AO1 r V 171 uONr W
V I r N 01 m V %D r m W O m W O m m 17 7 0 VIN r L.A.S. l. l O 1 p 1 V 1 p N✓ I. I I••° m
N
dur r r r r r N
DI r V N 01 NNI••+N O m10 A V T AA N r W m A a r
V VO� yI W A W A W O) A 0 7 a I J 1 W A V t n m 0 N V N 01 A r 10 a s 01 a w V+ N
b 1O NO1 "-41R N 01 m NI D• r CO O✓ V1 w w O O vO m ✓✓ V7 W r m V 10 C%r
O A 01 l J' 1 I V A r ON A 01 A W 01 W %D O I V V A N A V r W 171 N A O 1 r W N r C 1 10 W
O�V V N IV W A %D mr O% OD m 101J7 Co m W r 0 VI V Ar m OI N A 10 A N Aw ON
c N
C N
p N
Ib N
3
A
w
nD
r1 N
JN
ID
N
c O
D N
N
7
N
D D
A N
1 N
7 A
d N
f� /b
n
Du
N
13 r
•+ 7
CID
i eb N I
N I+
A
1 3
fJ f'1
r, >>I
I+
A
fb N
N I•
q 1n d
PI 13i
A 7
P►
D
N �
Ib O
N A
N �
a
N
7O
r_
S
D
7D
N !I
� 1
N <
s c
z
-r v
0
N
v >
O 1
A
V.
N Pn
T t^
O V•
O '*7
2 Z
CD
J I
D z
r — �
n
D -+
an
N r
tA
N
N � ;
O
d►
N 1
N
fT
O �
O �
S
.m+
2
v
c
t
G
v
1
v�
A
�
t1J�j
r
r r ^�
6 d W
A A W w
r r r O 1 N 01 A A I r V W C D V I
N l T 01 W W FF d C ,
dp�O
VI O m
v a✓ 01 01 m 10 D1 0 N 0 V a a 10 w m N
01 W 1D O O C� N VI p
C10
00000A
0 0 0 0 0 0
VI A. 00 V 00000000000100
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0V00000W 01 R�
O O O O O 05 O `c C ^•�
�
Y
Il 1
rT7
I
N
1 I
N K N A
WWWWWWW rr r
\
A A A A A A A N W N N N N N N W r A N
/ �
W
W r+W x 3
` \\\ 1
-.1411,
f
D f i 8 i a
a i D i Z f 3 D i a a D 9 a D D a D f
8 8 8 f i a f 8 ;71 c7
P -GPA 86 -p2J i
Exhibit Ilnll MAY 2 2 1986 ITEM
N
7O
r_
S
D
7D
N !I
� 1
N <
s c
z
-r v
0
N
v >
O 1
A
V.
N Pn
T t^
O V•
O '*7
2 Z
CD
J I
D z
r — �
n
D -+
an
N r
tA
N
N � ;
O
d►
N 1
N
fT
O �
O �
S
.m+
2
v
c
t
G
v
1
v�
A
•
AGREEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING
City Council for the City of Poway, hereinafter referred to as
"City" and Gravbill Medical Clinic , hereinafter
referred to as "Proponent" enter into this-Agreement of Understanding
based upon the following facts:
Proponent owns or has an equitable interest in land described by
tax assessor's parcel number(s) 321 - 271 -04
Proponent desires to amend the General Plan for this property in
accordance with the will of the City and without the expense of a
protracted process.
City is concerned that Proponent will create a General Plan
Amendment proposal unsatisfactory to City and consume time and
effort of City employees needlessly on an unsatisfactory proposal
unless City assists in directing Proponent.
Based upon the above - mentioned facts, City will grant Proponent a
review prior to filing any application for General Plan Amendment
upon the following understanding:
A. City will render no decision with regards to any General
Plan Amendment or part thereof.
B. City will receive no evidence, specific in nature, in
support of a particualr General Plan Amendment.
C. City will make no representations that will obligate the
City to render a decision in favor of or against any General
Plan Amendment or part thereof Proponent may subsequently
submit.
D. If any General Plan Amendment is subsequently submitted,
Proponent will proceed at its sole and exclusive risk with
the understanding that City has made no representations upon
which Proponent may rely.
Gray, Cary, Dries & Frye,
Dated: April 4, 1986 Proponent:
Signature
RECEIVED
APR -.a_
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
�OF44
By. Michael M. Hogan
Attorneys for Proponent
Graybill Medical Clinic
P -GPA 86 -02J MAY 2 2 1986 ITEM 2
ATTIC "A5_AI7 4ee,
C
SUBJECT: Pre - Application, General Plan Amendment 86 -02K
OWNER /APPLICANT: Jeffrey Yee and Lawrence Scott
LOCATION: Northwest quadrant of Garden Road and Sycamore
Canyon Road
APN: 323 - 071 -15
PARCEL SIZE: 20.10 Gross Acres
ABSTRACT
Current Land Use Plan: Residential Rural A (1 du /4, 8,
20, or 40 net acres) and
Residential Rural C (1 du /1, 2,
or 4 net acres)
Current Zoning Plan:
Requested Land Use Plan:
Requested Zoning Plan:
BACKGROUND
RR -A and RR -C
Residential Single Family 5 (4 -7
du /net acre)
RS -7
This application requests the redesignation of a triangular - shaped
parcel which is split zoned and presently undeveloped. The
southerly portion of the parcel is designated RR -C, has a grade of
less than 15 percent slope, and is traversed by the 100 year
floodplain and floodway of Los Penasquitos Creek, a major tributary
to Poway Creek. The northerly portion of the parcel is designated
RR -A and consists of a natural grade that exceeds 15 percent and 25
percent slope. The current zone boundary is established where the
terrain begins to exceed 15 percent slope. The subject parcel has
frontage on both Garden Road and Sycamore Canyon Road, which are
paved and unimproved, respectively.
The property to the north is designated RR -A and RR -C and is
undeveloped. The land to the west is designated RS -7 and is devel-
oped with a single- family subdivision. The property to the east is
designated RR -C and is presently occupied by a residence and
several accessory structures (private ranch), and is substantially
covered by a mature citrus grove. The parcel to the south, across
Garden Road, is designated RR -B and is occupied by horse corrals
and stables. The pre -1983 County land use designation for the sub-
ject site was (18) Multiple Rural - ldu /4, 8, 20, and 40 acres.
It should be noted that the future alignment of the proposed SR 125
could have a significant impact on the subject site.
JRN:is
Attachments:
5a. Location Map
5b. Letter of Request
Sc. Floodplain Map
5d. Topographic Contour Map
5e. Agreement of Understanding
26 OF 4 4
P -GPA 86 -02x MAY 22 1986 ITEM
ATTACHMENT: 5
April 4, 1986
City Hall
Department of Land Use Review
13325 Civic Center Drive
Poway, CA 92064
Dear City Council Members
Poway Investors are requesting a review by the City of Poway for a rezone
The reasons for this request are as follows:
JZ 2 -A f
1. An upgraded zoning to RS -7 from the presentARR -C zoning would conform to
land use in the vicinity of the proposed project. Presently, an exist-
ing development zoned RS -7 borders the western boundary of the proposed
project and a planned residential development has been approved just east
2. The proposed project would provide housing and ready accessibility
to both Garden Road Elementary School and the city without overdue
congestion
3 The present site was down- graded in 1978. A rezone would restore to the
owners the original land use and intent for which the property was
purchased
4 The City of Poway has benefitted from past actions by Poway Investors
A portion of the property which makes up the Garden Road Park was
donated by Poway Investors Developer fees exacted by the proposed
project would provide additional revenues and benefits to'both the
Poway School District and all the citizens of Poway
Sincerely,
'i re
2680 Deep Canyon Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
(213)278 -5417
28OF44
L P -GPA 86) MAY 22 1986 ITEM 2
/00 YEAS
YeZoaDPGA
BauAvJ>AA
FCGoowAy
Ar"-N(m y
® 0
CITY OF POWAY ITEM : P 6PA 86 -OZ K
TITLE : FGaaoFYrAia/ /IAA
SCALE N9 AT- TACHMENT SG-
I .P-G PA s6 -02K I MAY 2 2 1986 ITEM 2
AGREEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING
City Council for the City of P way, hereinafter referred to as
"City" and � 2Ajre !CC &CD hereinafter
referred to as "Proponent" enter into this Agreement of Understanding
based upon the following facts:
Proponent owns or has an equitable interest in land described by
tax assessor's parcel number(s ) -3,213 407 /Z6, Q6
Proponent desires to amend the General Plan for this property in
accordance with the will of the City and without the expense of a
protracted process.
City is concerned that Proponent will create a General Plan
Amendment proposal unsatisfactory to City and consume time and
effort of City employees needlessly on an unsatisfactory proposal
unless City assists in directing Proponent.
Based upon the above- mentioned facts, City will grant Proponent a
review prior to filing any application for General Plan Amendment
upon the following understanding:
A. City will render no decision with regards to any General
Plan Amendment or part thereof.
B. City will receive no evidence, specific in nature, in
support of a particualr General Plan Amendment.
C. City will make no representations that will obligate the
City to render a decision in favor of or against any General
Plan Amendment or part thereof Proponent may subsequently
submit.
D. If any General Plan Amendment is subsequently submitted,
Proponent will proceed at its sole and exclusive risk with
the understanding that City has made no sentations upon
which Proponent may rely.
Dated: �� O �' Proponent
r signature
DF � 4 P =GPA s6 -o 2x MAY 2 2 1986 I T E M
47r ",nerif Se
ATY OF POWA�
OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY bF SAN DIEGO )§
CITY OF POWAY )
We,
I } eilC4Jrc,tJCe_ Tcaz /�DlJ4 e1. I�tJUeJ,61 -s
(Please ofint name in fu
being duly sworn, depose and say that (I am (we are) the owner s) of
property located at 16 loin a rc- C D lJ +
(Add ess)
(Assessor's Parcel No.l 3,,?30V 45700 ) , for which ( I am)
(we are) requesting a (Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Tentative Parcel
Map, Conditional Use Permit, Variance, etc., Z ®Q E
through the City of Powav, California. Furthermore, (I) (we) hereby
appoint of 4 1
o & �
as our agent to a tin our behalf on all matt rig p ininq to the
processinq of this application.
Signed
r cl G 90 OW Zees 6'yo tj 29/1 _
Addres
Telephone
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
day of , 198.
NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE
P-GPA 86 -021 MAY 2 2 1986 ITEM 2
32 OF 4 4 City Hall Located at 13325 Civic Center Drive
Mailing Address P 0 Bo\ 785, Poway, California 92064 e (619) 748.6600, (611)) 695 1400 —
SUBJECT:
OWNER /APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
APN:
PARCEL SIZE:
nucmun (I m
Pre - Application, General Plan Amendment 86 -02L
Sickels Group (CDS) /VTN Southwest, Inc.
West side of Pomerado Road immediately opposite
Via Monte Carlo
314 - 370 -36
Approximately 14.27 acres
Current Land Use Plan:
Current Zoning Plan:
Requested Land Use Plan:
Requested Zoning Plan:
BACKGROUND
This application r
land characterized
consists of slopes
tion of the parcel
west. The subject
Pomerado Road.
squests the
by rolling
of 15 perc
exceeds 15
parcel has
Residential Rural C (1 du /1, 2.,
or 4 net acres)
RR -C
Residential Condominium (7 -12
du /net acre)
RC
redesignation
terrain. The
ant and less.
percent and s
approximately
of a vacant parcel of
majority of the site
The southwestern por-
lopes upward toward the
850 feet of frontage on
The property to the north is designated Commercial Office and is
occupied by a church facility and a single- family residence. The
land adjacent to the immediate west and south is designated RR -C
and is undeveloped. Property to the east,�,,across Pomerado Road, is
zoned RS -7 and is fully developed with a residential subdivision.
Property to the north of that subdivision is designated Commercial
Office and is developed with the Pomerado Medical Center. The
pre -1983 County land use designation for the subject site was two
(2) Residential - 1 du /acre.
JRN:pn
Attachments:
6a. Location Map
6b. Letter of Request
6c. Topographic Contour Map
6d. Agreement of Understanding
ATTACHMENT: 6
33 OF 4 4 _
EP-GPA g6 -Q2Y, MAY 2 2 1986 1 T E M 2
SRI
340F44
.P -GPA 86 -02L 1 MAY 2 2 1986. ITEM
•
RECEIVE®
yt% VTN SAN DIEGO
a subsidian7 of CPE ENGINEERS. INC. APK - 4 IJOL)
4845 Ronson Court PLANNING DEPARTMENT
San Diego California 92111
(619) 292 1040
April 4, 1986 Job No. 5523 -01
File (3), P -3
City of Poway
P. 0. Box 789
Poway, CA 92064
Attn Reba Touw, Director of Planning Services
RE General Plan Pre- Application
Dear Reba
Please accept this letter as our request for consideration of a pre - application
amendment for general plan on 14.265 acres of land located on the west side of
Pomerado Road immediately south of St. Michaels church in the Rural Residential
C land use and Rural Residential C zone. Our request is for a senior citizen
facility. This facility would necessitate the change of the general plan to a
Residential Condominium land use and a Residential Condominium zone and the
approval of a use permit.
The client which we represent is the Sickels Group better known to the City of
Poway as CDS. Our contact is David R. Snyder, Jr., 4275 Executive Square, Suite
400, La Jolla, CA 92037, telephone number 458 -1179.
Should you have any questions, please do not hestiate to contact us or the
client.
Very truly yours,
SOUTyWEST, INC.
ar K. HranJ
i r for o P�}llanni ng
BKH mq
cc David R. Snyder, Jr., The Sickels Group
,r
P-cPA 86 -02I, MAY 2 2 1986 ITEM 2
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
Wt
0 •
r
AGREEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING
City Council for the City of Poway, hereinafter referred to as
"City" and 5 Vet,12 t�h I, F_ , hereinafter
referred to as "Proponent" enter into this Agreement of Understanding
based upon the following facts:
Proponent owns or has an equitable interest in land described by
tax assessor's parcel number(s) -�i4- 37%7 -36 •
Proponent desires to amend the General Plan for this property in
accordance with the will of the City and without the expense of a
protracted process.
City is concerned that Proponent will create a General Plan
Amendment proposal unsatisfactory to City and consume time and
effort of City employees needlessly on an unsatisfactory proposal
unless City assists in directing Proponent.
Based upon the above - mentioned facts,. City will grant Proponent a
review prior to filing any application for General Plan Amendment
upon the following understanding:
A. City will render no decision with regards to any General
Plan Amendment or part thereof.
B. City will receive no evidence, specific in nature, in
support of a particualr General Plan Amendment.
C. City will make no representations that will obligate the
City to render a decision in favor of or against any General
Plan Amendment or part thereof Proponent may subsequently
submit.
D.
If any General Plan Amendment is subsequently submitted,
Proponent will proceed at its sole and exclusive risk with
the understanding that City has made no representations upon
which Proponent may rely.
Dated: 4111AV Propone
7OF 4
P=
SUBJECT: Pre - Application, General Plan Amendment 86 -02M
OWNER /APPLICANT: Edon Centennial Properties /Donald Fischer
LOCATION: North side of Espola Road, west of Old Coach
Road, and extending northerly to the Poway city
boundary
APN: 272- 071 -7; 272 -14 -2; 272 -15 -1; 273- 10U -10 & 11;
273 - 182 -18 & 19; 276 - 070 -16; 277 - 010 -2, 5, 22,
& 23; 277 - 011 -1; 277 - 071 -12, 8, & 9; 277 - 070 -24,
27, 28, 29, 30, & 31; 277 - 140 -1, 6, 23, 24, 26,
& 27
PARCEL SIZE: Total area of involved parcels: approximately
1,285 gross acres
ABSTRACT
Current Land Use Plan:
Current Zoning Plan:
Requested Land Use Plan:
Requested Zoning Plan:
BACKGROUND
Residential Rural A
20, or 40 net acres)
Residential Rural B
or 8 net acres)
Residential Rural C
or 4 net acres)
RR -A, RR -B, and RR -C
Planned Community
PC
(1 du /4, 8,
(1 du /2, 4,
(1 du /1, 2,
This application requests the redesignation of a large undeveloped
site located in northern Poway adjacent to the existing Stoneridge
development and extending northerly to the Poway /San Diego cor-
porate boundary. In conjunction with this application, the appli-
cant has submitted a Draft Opportunities and Constraints Report for
a proposed project known as " Stoneridge East." That report pro-
vides a detailed analysis of the subject property and identifies a
number of planning implications and recommendations for the pro-
perty in question. The property's present access is primarily from
the south and east at Espola Road and Old Coach Road, respectively.
The topography of the site ranges from zero to 45 percent, and
above. A slope analysis map is attached as Attachment 7c.
The properties to the north and east of the site, within the City
of Poway, are designated RR -A and are undeveloped, with the excep-
tion of several dwellings in Old Coach Estates. The northwest
boundary of the site is contiguous with the City of Poway /City of
San Diego corporate boundary. Adjoining City of San Diego zoning
is A -1 -10 (Argicultural -1 du /10 acres). The land to the south,
across Espola Road, is designated RR -C and PRD, and is developed
8 QF 4 4 P -GPA 86 -02M MAY 2 2 1986 ITEM Z
E,
El
Edon Centennial
May 22, 1986
Page 2
with Green Valley Estates and Bridlewood Estates, respectively.
The parcels to the immediate west, within Stoneridge Estates, are
occupied by single - family dwellings. The property north of
Stoneridge and west of the site, within the City of Poway, is
designated RR -A and is undeveloped.
JRN:is
Attachments:
7a. Location Map
7b. Justification Statement
7c. Slope Analysis Map
7d. Pre -1983 County Land Use Map
7e. Agreement of Understanding
ATTACHMENT: 7
P -cPA s6 -02M MAY 22 1986 ITEM Z
(D SCALE : Al 1A
®4044
RR -A
:i'
tow
ITEM: F- 6"A 86 -DZ Al
TITLE : LoCATi0A1 MAP
ATTACHMENT : 70--
P -GPA 86 -02M MAY 2 2 1986 1 T E M Z
STONERIDGE EAST - JUSTIFICATION FOR PLAN AMENDMENT
The subject property of 1285 acres is located in the north part of Poway, extending
north from Espola Road to the City's boundary contiguous with the San Diego City
boundary. A number of land use proposals have been prepared for the southern 711
acres with the most recent action being an application for a General Plan
amendment which was submitted for consideration on June 26, 1985. This
application was subsequently withdrawn since the applicant was unable to provide
the requested detailed analysis by the August 16 deadline.
During the interim period the applicant has acquired an option on an additional 574
acres directly north of the original 711 acre parcel. The planning and environ-
mental consultant team is currently preparing an "Opportunities and Constraints
Analysis" for the entire 1285 acres. The content and format of this analysis is in
conformance with that as requested by the City. It is the desire of the applicant to
work with the City in arriving at the appropriate land uses and utlimately in
creating a planned community of the highest order.
An amendment to the General Plan from the existing designations to the "Planned
Community" designation would afford the owners an opportunity to evaluate
alternative development concepts based upon the comprehensive opportunities and
constraints analysis currently underway. The subject property holds the potential
for the creation of a community of the highest quality in terms of lifestyle,
sensitivity to the natural environment and compatiability with existing neighbor-
hoods. A planned community will allow for a higher level of use of this land while
at the same time providing for the effective long term preservation of large acres
of open space and the rural character of Poway
c{;V�-
L!;AY
PLA W :
a 0
r
MAY 22 9986 ITEM 2 i P -GPA 86 -02M
° F 4 4 AZIAC A4�kl/
r
Q.
q: Ji
, Pi
Jai
A,
U
io
Slope Analysis
Slope Categories
Cf' ....... .....
E] 0 to 15%
u El 15% to 25%
q
N
X,
. VI ul 25% to 45%
45% and &be"
ITEM
TITLE 51-oP6 ANALYSIS MAP
• E S PO LW, —1R �b
SCALE•
: NAN ATTACHMENT:
OF 44
m, ITEM
p GpA 86 -0 2
77
N
,
,
�t
i
� I
J
LA0.1D USE- DESlGn1A'r�O�.d
� _ I- -(1 DU / I,Z, Ab I ACV—
Du•/4,8,ZD AWD 40 Ac2Es�
i
CD SCALE : NIA
43 °F 4 4
if-
ITEM : P -6PA 86 -OZ M
T I T L E: )WE- / 983 COVA47Y ZOa
ATTACHMENT : 7d,
C —GPA 86 -o zM MAY 22 1986 ITEM 2
i
AGREEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING
City Council for the City of Poway, hereinafter referred to as
"City" and Don Fischer , hereinafter
referred to as "Proponent" enter into this Agreement of Understanding
based upon the following facts:
Proponent owns or has an equitable interest in land described by
tax assessor's parcel number(s ) see attached
Proponent desires to amend the General Plan for this property in
accordance with the will of the City and without the expense of a
protracted process.
City is concerned that Proponent will create a General Plan
Amendment proposal unsatisfactory to City and consume time and
effort of City employees "needlessly on an unsatisfactory proposal
unless City assists in directing Proponent.
Based upon the above - mentioned facts, City will grant Proponent a
review prior to filing any application for General Plan Amendment
upon the following understanding:
A. City will render no decision with regards to any General
Plan Amendment or part thereof.
B. City will receive no evidence, specific in nature, in
support of a particualr General Plan Amendment.
C. City will make no representations that will obligate the
City to render a decision in favor of or against any General
Plan Amendment or part thereof Proponent may subsequently
submit.
D. If any General Plan Amendment is subsequently submitted,
Proponent will proceed at its sole and exclusive risk with
the understanding that City has made no representations upon
which Proponent may rely.
Dated: April 4, 1986 Proponent:
Sig atur`e .Don Fischer
PL: SN _
j P -GPA 86 -p MAY 2 2 1986 I T E M Z
x
41F44