The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 2.1 - Public Hearing to Take Input Regarding Draft Voting District Maps & Potential Sequence of District Elections(i) City of Poway COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: CONTACT: August 18, 2017 APPROVED ❑ APPROVED AS AMENDED ❑ (SEE MINUTES) DENIED ❑ REMOVED ❑ CONTINUED RESOLUTION NO. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Morgan Foley, City Attorney John Ramirez, Partner Rutan & Tucker (Special Counsel) Morgan Foley, City Attorney mfoley cDpoway.org SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Take Input Regarding Draft Voting District Maps and Potential Sequence of District Elections as Part of Transition to By -District Elections for City Council Members Summary: Following a properly noticed public hearing held on July 18, 2017, the Council adopted Resolution No. 17-046 (Attachment A) outlining its intention to transition from at -large to by -district elections, pursuant to Elections Code section 10010(e)(3)(A). Pursuant to Elections Code section 10010(a)(1), the City held two public hearings before the drawing of any draft maps of proposed voting districts in order to receive public input regarding the composition of the districts. Based on public input and the criteria for drawing voting districts adopted by the Council, the City's districting consultant has prepared several draft voting district maps, which, together with eligible maps submitted by the public, are being presented to the Council and the public for discussion (Attachment B). This hearing is the first of two required public hearings to take public input regarding draft voting district maps. (Elec. Code § 10010(a)(2).) Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Council receive public comment and discuss the draft voting district maps presented, as well as the potential sequence of the elections for the districts. It is also recommended that the Council consider eliminating any draft maps that it no longer wishes to consider adopting in order to reduce the number of maps to a more manageable number, ideally somewhere between 4-6 maps. Discussion: The California Voting Rights Act ("CVRA") (California Elections Code § 14025 et seq.) was specifically enacted in 2002 to eliminate several key burden -of -proof requirements that exist under the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 ("FVRA") (52 U.S.C. § 10301 et seq.) after several jurisdictions in California successfully defended themselves in litigation brought under the FVRA. As a result, the CVRA is tilted heavily in favor of plaintiffs' attorneys. Indeed, over the relatively short 15 -year history of the CVRA, and 1 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Public Hearing to Take Input Regarding Draft Voting District Maps as Part of Transition to By -District Elections for City Council Members August 18, 2017 Page 2 only after an initial challenge to it was resolved in 2006, public agencies have paid nearly $15 million to CVRA plaintiff attorneys. Due to the combination of the CVRA's low burden to trigger mandatory districting and its mandatory attorneys' fees provision, all CVRA cases that have been filed have ended with the defendant governmental agency implementing a district election system and paying some sort of attorneys' fee payment to those plaintiffs bringing such actions. In 2016, responding to the substantial costs imposed upon cities and other public agencies in defending CVRA lawsuits, the California Legislature amended the Elections Code to simplify the process of converting to by -district elections and to provide a "safe harbor" process to protect agencies from litigation. If a city receives a demand letter, such as the case here, then the city is given 45 days of protection from litigation to assess its situation. If within that 45 days, the city adopts a resolution declaring the Council's intent to transition from at -large to district based elections, outlining the steps to be taken to facilitate that transition, and estimating a time frame for action, then a potential plaintiff is prohibited from filing a CVRA action for an additional 90 -day period. (Elec. Code § 10010(e)(3).) Here, because the Council enacted Resolution No. 17-046 on July 18, 2017 declaring its intent to convert to a by -district method of election, which was within 45 days of receiving the demand letter, a CVRA lawsuit cannot be filed before October 16, 2017. (Elec. Code § 10010(e)(3).) Following the enactment of Resolution No.17-046, pursuant to Elections Code section 10010(a)(1), the City Council held two hearings (on August 1 and August 8, 2017) to take public input regarding the composition of the City's voting districts before any draft maps were drawn. At its August 1, 2017 hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 17-055 (Attachment D), which set forth the mandatory districting criteria required by federal law (equal population across districts and compliance with the FVRA), as well as other criteria to be considered, such as topography, geography, cohesiveness/contiguity/ integrity/compactness of territory, and community of interests. The City's districting consultant, National Demographics Corporation ("NDC"), has now drawn four proposed district maps pursuant to the factors set forth in Resolution No. 17- 055 and input provided by the public. NDC will present these maps to the Council (and public) for consideration and comment, along with all eligible maps submitted by the public, for a total of twenty-seven (27) draft maps (Attachment B). Attachment C reflects comments submitted with each map proposal. In addition to the maps reflected in Attachment B, four maps (106, 109, 112, and 130) were submitted by the public but did not meet legal requirements and are not included in this report. At the August 8, 2017 public hearing, Council stressed the importance of not identifying maps based upon who submitted them. Therefore, all maps attached to this report, including those prepared by NDC, are identified by number only. All of these draft maps were made publicly available on August 10, 2017 (see, http://drawpoway.org/draft-maps/), in compliance with requirements set forth in Elections Code section 10010(a)(2). Any maps submitted by the public after August 11, 2017 cannot be discussed at this August 18, 2017 hearing 2 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Public Hearing to Take Input Regarding Draft Voting District Maps as Part of Transition to By -District Elections for City Council Members August 18, 2017 Page 3 but, if eligible, will be presented at the Council's August 31, 2017 hearing (the second public hearing that will be held for the purpose of taking public comment on draft voting district maps and the potential sequence of district elections). While not required, because of the unusually large number of maps submitted by the public, staff recommends that at this August 18 hearing, the Council consider eliminating any draft maps that it no longer wishes to consider adopting in order to reduce the number of maps to a more manageable number, ideally somewhere between 4-6 maps. Reducing the number of maps will assist the Council in ultimately choosing a map at its August 31 hearing, where the Council will direct staff to prepare an ordinance adopting the chosen voting district map for consideration at the Council's September 19, 2017 hearing. Online resources that allow the public to submit their own maps (both in paper and online) are available at http://drawpoway.org. The public is encouraged to submit any additional draft maps on or before August 23, 2017 so that those maps, if eligible, can be presented and discussed at the Council's August 31, 2017 public hearing. Environmental Review: This item is not subject to CEQA review. Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact associated with holding this public hearing. The overall fiscal impacts of voluntarily converting to district elections is estimated to be approximately $82,500. Public Notification: None. Attachments: A. Resolution 17-046 B. Draft Voting District Maps C. Comments Received with Each Map Proposal D. Resolution 17-055 Reviewed/Approved By: Reviewed By: WendyKaserman or an ole Assistant City Manager Cit rneyKJ Appr v'4 W�.ed By! - l� l.�K/LItiC� Tina M. White City Manager 3 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 RESOLUTION NO. 17-046 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA, EXPRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENTION, PURSUANT TO ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 10010(e)(3)(A), TO INITIATE PROCEDURES FOR ESTABLISHING AND IMPLEMENTING BY -DISTRICT ELECTIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS WHEREAS, the City of Poway, California ("City') is a general law city, duly organized under the constitution and laws of the State of California; WHEREAS, four of the members of the Poway City Council are currently elected in at -large elections, in which each City Council member is elected by all registered voters of the entire City, with the mayor being separately elected by all registered voters of the entire City, pursuant to California Government Code sections 34871 and 34900 at seq.; WHEREAS, section 34886 of the Government Code authorizes any city to change to a by -district system or by -district system with an elective mayor without the need to put such a change to voters; WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to move from its current at -large electoral system to a by -district election for members of the City Council, in furtherance of the purposes of California Voting Rights Act; WHEREAS, the City intends to make this transition from an at -large system to a by -district system in accordance with the procedural rules outlined in Government Code section 34886 and Elections Code section 10010; WHEREAS, the City received a letter threatening action under the California Voting Rights Act on June 7, 2017, less than forty-five (45) days before the date of this Resolution; WHEREAS, the City will begin by working with an experienced demographer to assist the City in establishing maps for a by -district electoral system; WHEREAS, before drawing a draft map of the proposed boundaries of the districts, the City will hold at least two (2) public hearings over no more than thirty (30) days, at which time the public is invited to provide input regarding the composition of the districts; WHEREAS, the City will then publish and make available for release at least one (1) draft map of the new electoral districts, including the potential sequence of elections shown; 4 of 66 ATTACHMENT A August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Resolution No. 17-046 Page 2 WHEREAS, once the draft map has been publicized for at least seven (7) days the City will hold at least two (2) additional public hearings, over a period of no more than forty-five (45) days at which time the public is invited to provide input regarding the content of the draft map and the proposed sequence of elections prior to the public hearing at which the City Council adopts a map; WHEREAS, if a draft map is revised at or following a public hearing, the revised map will be published and made available to the public at least seven (7) days before the City chooses to adopt it; and WHEREAS, in determining the final sequence of staggered district elections, the City Council will give special consideration to the purposes of the California Voting Rights Act, and will take in to account the preferences expressed by the members of the districts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Poway, California, as follows: Section 1: The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2: The City Council hereby resolves, pursuant to Elections Code section 10010, to adopt a by -district election system by ordinance as authorized by California Government Code section 34886, for use in the City's General Municipal Election for City Council Members. Section 3: The City Council further resolves to retain a qualified demographer, hold at least five (5) public hearings and publish at least one (1) draft map and staggering sequence, pursuant to the proposed hearing schedule attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Section 4: The City's redistricting/demographic consulting firm, acting under the supervision of the City Manager, is hereby authorized to direct and formulate one or more electoral district scenarios for review by the public and City Council at two or more public hearings if necessary, in accordance with the city's proposed timeline. Section 5: Working with the demographic consulting firm, staff is directed to publicize relevant maps, information, notices, agendas and other materials regarding by - district elections and to establish means of communication to answer questions from the public. Section 6: All public hearings shall be noticed as follows: posting on the city's website at least ten (10) calendar days in advance of the hearing and publication at least ten (10) days in advance of the hearing in the newspaper adjudicated to provide notice within the City. Section 7: The City Manager is authorized to take any and all other necessary actions to give effect to this Resolution. 5 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Resolution No. 17-046 Page 3 Section 8: This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Poway, California, at a regular meeting this 18th day of July 2017. Steve Vaus, Mayor /.\aI*II NancyA46 fell CIVIC, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) I, Nancy Neufeld, City Clerk of the City of Poway, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 17-046 was duly adopted by the City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on the 18th day of July 2017, and that it was so adopted by the following vote: AYES: CUNNINGHAM, GROSCH, MULLIN, LEONARD, VAUS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE DISQUALIFIED: NONE ao6l Zno N6061d, CMC, City Clerk City of Poway 6 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Resolution No. 17-046 Page 4 Exhibit "A" District Election Timeline June 7, 2017 City receives letter alleging violation of California Voting Rights Act July 18, 2017 Public Hearing City Council adopts resolution setting forth intention and timeline for adopting by -district elections. August 1, 2017 @ 7 p.m. Public Hearing Regular City Council Meeting Overview of the process and city demographics. Gather input from public to be used in establishing options for district boundaries. Adopt resolution setting forth mandatory and permissive districting criteria. August 8, 2017 @ 7 p.m. Public Hearing Special City Council Meeting Second hearing to gather input from public to be used in establishing options for district boundaries. August 11. 2017 Draft maps available for public review. August 18, 2017 @ 6 p.m. Public Hearing Special City Council Meeting Public hearing to discuss and take public comment on draft maps and proposed sequence of elections. August 31, 2017 @ 7 p.m. Public Hearing Special City Council Meeting Public hearing to discuss and take public comment on draft maps and proposed sequence of elections. September 19, 2017 @ 7 p.m. Public Hearing Regular City Council Meeting Introduce ordinance for first reading establishing district boundaries and transition plan/sequence of elections. October 3, 2017 Public Meeting Regular City Council Meeting Second reading and adoption of ordinance establishing district maps and transition plan/sequence of elections. All public hearings will lake place in the City Council Chambers, 13325 Civic Center Drive, Poway, CA 92064 7 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 100 City of Poway 2017 Districting Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 4 2020: 1 & 3 ii Rancho B N� 2 4 Poway Rd m Rd Poway Rd 3 LV Map layers Plan 100 Water Area Streets �y River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 8 of 66 ATTACHMENT B August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 100 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,953 11,504 12,085 12,269 47,811 Deviation from ideal 0 -449 132 316 765 • Deviation 0.00% -3.76% 1.10% 2.64% 6.40% Total Pop Hisp 8% 16% 16% 23% 16% % NH White 80% 70% 70% 57% 69% °/ NH Black 1°/ 2% 2% 2°/ 2°/ %Asian -American 10% 11% 10% 16% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 9,197 8,497 8,985 9,184 35,863 % Hisp 7% 13% 13% 20% 13% % NH White 82% 73% 74% 60% 72% %NH Black 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% %Asian -American 9% 11% 10% 16% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,851 8,105 8,207 9,075 34,238 % Hisp 6% 14% 11% 18% 12% % NH White 84% 75% 73% 60% 73% % NH Black 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 8% 7% 12% 19% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 8,298 6,852 7,269 6,257 28,676 % Latino 6% 9% 10% 13% 9% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 3% 6°/ 4 ° ° ° � Filipino -Surnamed 1% ° ° 2% ° o 1% ° / ° 2 1% % Democratic 23% 26% 24% 27% 25% % Republican 48% 44% 46% 41% 45% % Other 29% 31% 30% 32% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 5,168 3,806 3,961 3,143 1 16,078 Latino 4% 6% 7% 9% 6% %Asian -Surnamed 4% 2% 2% 5% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% % Democratic 24% 27% 25% 28% 25% %Republican 53% 49% 53% 49% 51% %Other 23% 24% 1 23% 23% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 7,103 5,513 5,878 4,962 23,456 % Latino 5% 8% 8% 11% 8 % Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 3% 5% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 11,939 11,951 11,939 13,716 49,545 Age age0-19 24% 28% 27% 28% 27% age20-60 48% 52% 54% 55% 53% age60plus 28% 19% 19% 17% 21% Immigration immigrants 14% 16% 16% 25% 18% naturalized 75% 56% 1 54% 60% 61% Language spoken at home english 83% 78% 78% 65% 76% spanish 69/o 9% 11% 18% 11% asian-lang 4% 6% 6% 13% 7% other lang 6% 6% 4% 5% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 6% Very Well" 10% 9% 17% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 38% 48% 47% 55% 47% bachelor 34% 29% 30% 24% 29% graduatedegree 24% 17% 15% 11% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 34% 40% 39% 42% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 56% 61% 60% 629/. 8% Commute on Public 2% Transit 2% 1% 2% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 13% 12% 9% 12% 11% income 25-50k 11% 15% 16% 17% 15% income 50-75k 9% 10% 14% 17% 13% income 75-200k 45% 51% 49% 45% 479/4 income 200k -plus 21% 13% 12% 10% 14% Housing Stats single family 90% 83% 89% 73% 83% multi -family 10% 17% 11% 27% 17% rented 20% 24% 24% 36% 26% owned 80% 76% 76% 64% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 9 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 101 City of Poway 2017 Districting Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 3 2020: 1 & 4 or Rancho B 2018: 3 & 4 2020: 1 & 2 0 0 nardo Rd tt C 1 6� 2 � -'win Peaks Rd Poway Rd Poway Rd - 4- r Map layers ® Plan 101 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 10 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 101 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,913 11,784 12,064 12,050 47,811 Deviation from ideal -40 -169 111 97 280 %Deviation -0.33% -1.41% 0.93% 0.81% 2.34% Total Pop % Hisp 9% 9% 20% 25% 16% %NH White 81% 77% 63% 55% 69% %NH Black 1°/ 2% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 8% 11% 12% 15% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 8,999 8,984 9,052 8,828 35,863 % Hisp 7% 8% 17% 21% 13% o/ NH White 83% 79% 67% 59% 72% %NH Black 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 8% 10% 12% 15% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,517 8,821 8,312 8,588 34,238 % Hisp 9% 9% 13% 19% 12% o 0 0 / NH White 82 / 0 0 78 / 0° 70 / o 0 0 0 61 / 73 / %NH Black 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 7% 10% 13% 17% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 8,200 7,856 6,683 5,937 28,676 %Latino 6% 79/o 11% 13% 9% % Asian -Surnamed 3 % 4% 3°/ 60/ 4 % ° o 0 / Filipino -Surnamed 1 / 2 / 0 0 2 / ° o 0 0 ° o 2 / 1 / % Democratic 22% 25% 25% 27% 25% o/ Republican 49% 45% 43% 40% 45% % Other 28% 30% 32% 33% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 5,079 4,686 3,511 2,803 1 16,078 % Latino 49/o 5% 7% 10% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 3% 3°/ 4% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% % Democratic 22% 26% 27% 28% 25% %Republican 54% 51% 50% 48% 51% Other 24% 23% 1 23% 24% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 7,061 6,555 5,314 4,525 23,456 % Latino 6% 6% 9% 11% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 3% 3% 5% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 11,612 11,843 12,449 13,640 49,545 Age age0-19 26% 24% 27% 29% 27% age20-60 50% 500/ 55% 55% 53% age60plus 23% 26% 18% 16% 21% Immigration immigrants 11% 16% 17% 279/o 18% naturalized 71% 74% 1 59% 52% 61% Language spoken at home english 86% 80% 78% 62% 76% spanish 6% 79/o 10% 21% 11% asian-lang 3% 6% 9% 10% 7% other lang 5% 7% 3% 7% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 3% Very Well" 8% 11% 20% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 36% 44% 53% 54% 47% bachelor 35% 31% 28% 249/o 29% graduatedegree 26% 18% 12% 10% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 36% 34% 38% 45% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 579/o 569/o 63% 649/ 8% Commute on Public 1% Transit 2% 1% 2% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 79/o 15% 9% 14% 11% income 25-50k 10% 12% 18% 17% 159/4 income 50-75k 12% 10% 12% 17% 13% income 75-200k 46% 48% 51% 449/o 479/4 income 200k -plus 24% 15% 10% 7% 14% Housing Stats single family 99% 849/o 82% 709/o 839/o multi -family 1% 16% 18% 30% 17% rented 12% 26% 26% 40% 26% owned 88% 74% 74% 60% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 11 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 102 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho Barnardo Rd 0 Oft rfl � o � 7d C 0 2 ."I 4 12 of 66 K Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 4 2020: 1 & 3 or 2018: 3 & 4 2020: 1 & 2 1 _Twin Peaks Rd Poway Rd WOONO Map layers ® Plan 102 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 102 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,349 12,254 12,072 12,136 47,811 Deviation from ideal -604 301 119 183 905 • Deviation -5.05% 2.52% 1.00% 1.53% 7.57% Total Pop Hisp 13% 7% 22% 20% 16% % NH White 75% 80% 60% 62% 69% %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 29/o 29/o %Asian -American 9% 10% 13% 14% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 8,576 9,351 8,813 9,123 35,863 % Hisp 11% 6% 19% 17% 13% % NH White 78% 81% 64% 65% 72% %NH Black 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 8% 10% 13% 14% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 7,936 9,033 8,613 8,657 34,238 % Hisp 9% 9% 15% 16% 12% o ° o799/o / NH White 79 / ° o679/o739/o 66 / %NH Black 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 8% 9% 15% 14% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 7,351 8,296 6,235 6,794 28,676 %Latino 7% 69/o 13% 11% 9% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 4% 4% 4°/ 4% % Filipino -Surnamed 1/ 1/ 2/ 2/ 1/ Democratic 23% 24% 26% 27% 25% % Republican 48% 47% 41% 42% 45% % Other 29% 29% 33% 32% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 4,276 5,121 3,044 3,636 1 16,078 Latino 5% 4% 9% 8% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 3% 3% 4% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% % Democratic 23% 25% 26% 28% 25% Republican 54% 52% 48% 50% 51% % Other 23% 23% 1 26% 22% 1 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 6,152 7,011 4,775 5,518 23,456 % Latino 6% 5% 11% 10% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 11,216 12,179 13,341 12,809 49,545 Age age0-19 25% 25% 30% 289/o 279/o age20-60 539/o 489/o 55% 549/o 53% age60plus 22% 27% 15% 18% 21% Immigration immigrants 14% 15% 23% 20% 18% naturalized 54% 78% 1 50% 66% 61% Language spoken at home english 84% 82% 65% 74% 76% spanish 89/o 69/o ° 19% 11% 11% asian-lang 4% 5% 9% 11% 7% other lang 3% 7% 7% 4% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 7% Very Well" 7% 17% 13% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 41% 38% 52% 56% 47% bachelor 339A 329/o 27% 269/o 29% graduatedegree 21% 23% 10% 13% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 35% 36% 45% 39% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 599/o 559/o 63% 629/. 8% Commute on Public 0% Transit 2% 2% 1% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 89/o 14% 13% 10% 11% income 25-50k 16% 11% 17% 15% 15% income 50-75k 12% 10% 15% 15% 13% income 75-200k 46% 45% 48% 51% 479/4 income 200k -plus 19% 20% 7% 10% 14% Housing Stats single family 87% 88% 77% 81% 839/o multi -family 13% 12% 23% 19% 17% rented 21% 20% 35% 29% 26% owned 79% 80% 65% 71% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 13 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 103 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B4rnardo Rd rC I o tt C '3 2 �J Poway Rd y i1 Fj 14 of 66 Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 4 2020: 1 & 3 1 -_-'win Peaks Rd Poway Rd Scr1i'�S y Map layers ® Plan 103 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 103 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,773 12,516 11,996 11,526 47,811 Deviation from ideal -180 563 43 -427 990 %Deviation -1.51% 4.71% 0.36% -3.57% 8.28% Total Pop % Hisp 12% 16% 13% 22% 16% %NH White 76% 71% 72% 58% 69% %NH Black 1°/ 2% 2% 3% 2% %Asian -American 9% 9% 12% 16% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 8,807 9,319 9,162 8,575 35,863 % Hisp 10% 13% 11% 19% 13% % NH White 79% 74% 74% 61% 72% %NH Black 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 9% 9% 12% 16% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,291 8,526 8,892 8,529 34,238 % Hisp 10% 12% 12% 16% 12% / NH White 79/ 76/ 74/ 61/ 73/ %NH Black 2% 3% 1% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 8% 8% 11% 19% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 7,688 7,504 7,590 5,894 28,676 % Latino 8% 89/o 8% 13% 9% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 4°/ 50/ 4% / Filipino -Surnamed 1/ 2/ 2/ 2/ 1/ % Democratic 23% 24% 25% 27% 25% o/ Republican 48% 45% 45% 40% 45% % Other 30% 30% 30% 33% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 4,499 4,216 4,515 2,848 1 16,078 % Latino 6% 5% 6% 9% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 30/ 3% 4% 4% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% % Democratic 23% 26% 27% 27% 25% %Republican 54% 51% 51% 49% 51% Other 23% 23% 1 23% 24% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 6,464 6,125 6,328 4,540 23,456 % Latino 7% 79/. 7% 11% 8 % Asian -Surnamed 3% 3% 4% 5% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 11,683 12,613 12,139 13,109 49,545 Age age0-19 27% 28% 24% 299/o 279/o age20-60 529/o 529/o 50% 569/o 53% age60plus 21% 20% 26% 15% 21% Immigration immigrants 14% 15% 18% 25% 189/o naturalized 62% 56% 1 75% 54% 61% Language spoken at home english 81% 81% 78% 65% 76% spanish 9% 9% 8% 18% 11% asian-lang 4% 6% 7% 12% 7% other lang 6% 4% 7% 5% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 6% Very Well" 9% 10% 18% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 42% 45% 47% 54% 47% bachelor 329A 309/o 30% 25% 29% graduatedegree 20% 18% 17% 11% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 37% 40% 34% 43% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 589/o 62% 56% 639/. 8% Commute on Public 1% Transit 1% 2% 2% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 9% 10% 15% 12% 11% income 25-50k 12% 17% 12% 18% 15% income 50-75k 12% 11% 13% 15% 13% income 75-200k 50% 47% 46% 46% 47% income 200k -plus 18% 15% 14% 9% 14% Housing Stats single family 96% 84% 81% 72% 83% multi -family 4% 16% 19% 28% 17% rented 18% 22% 29% 35% 26% owned 82% 78% 71% 65% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 15 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 104 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B4rnardo Rd 11 Ni 01 1 Twin Peaks Rd Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 4 2020: 1 & 3 or 2018: 3 & 4 2020: 1 & 2 Other options possible Poway Rd Map layers ® Plan 104 Water Area Streets River —' National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 16 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 104 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,968 12,081 11,806 11,956 47,811 Deviation from ideal 15 128 -147 3 275 • Deviation 0.13% 1.07% -1.23% 0.03% 2.30% Total Pop Hisp 10% 20% 25% 8% 16% % NH White 77% 66% 55% 78% 69% %NH Black 1% 29/o 3% 1% 29/o %Asian -American 11% 10% 15% 11% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 8,890 8,959 8,824 9,190 35,863 % Hisp 8% 16% 22% 7% 13% % NH White 80% 70% 59% 79% 72% %NH Black 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% %Asian -American 10% 10% 15% 11% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,059 8,378 8,859 8,942 34,238 % Hisp 8% 15% 19% 8% 12% o 0 0 / NH White 79 / 72 / ° o 61 / ° o ° o ° o 79 / 73 / % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 10% 10% 16% 10% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 7,920 6,841 5,883 8,032 28,676 Latino 6% 11% 15% 7% 9% % Asian -Surnamed 5% 3 / 4% 4°/ 4% / Filipino -Surnamed 1/ 2/ 2/ 2/ 1/ % Democratic 23% 25% 28% 24% 25% % Republican 49% 44% 39% 46% 45% % Other 29% 31% 33% 30% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 4,726 3,637 2,870 4,846 1 16,078 Latino 49/o 8% 10% 5% 6% %Asian -Surnamed 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 0% 2% 2% 1% 1% % Democratic 23% 26% 28% 26% 25% %Republican 54% 50% 48% 52% 51% Other 22% 24% 1 25% 23% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 6,753 5,430 4,527 6,747 23,456 % Latino 5% 9% 11% 6% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 11,988 12,218 13,297 12,042 49,545 Age age0-19 27% 289/o 28°/ 249/o 279/o age20-60 519/o 54% 56°/ 509/o 539/o age60plus 22% 18% 17% 26% 21% Immigration immigrants 15% 16% 25% 169/o 18% naturalized 63% 52% 1 56% 76% 61% Language spoken at home english 80% 79% 65% 80% 76% spanish 9% 10% 19% 79/o 11% asian-lang 5% 7% 11% 7% 7% other lang 6% 4% 5% 6% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 7% Very Well" 10% 18% 8% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 37% 49% 57% 44% 47% bachelor 339A 30% 24% 319/o 29% graduatedegree 25% 13% 10% 19% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 38% 40% 41% 34% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 589/o 639/o 62% 569/. 8% Commute on Public 1% Transit 1% 2% 2% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 89/o 10% 13% 14% 11% income 25-50k 11% 179/o 18% 12% 159/o income 50-75k 129/o 129/o 17% 10% 13% income 75-200k 46% 51% 45% 47% 479/4 income 200k -plus 23% 10% 8% 16% 14% Housing Stats single family 94% 849/o 70% 859/o 839/o multi -family 6% 16% 30% 15% 17% rented 16% 26% 37% 24% 26% owned 84% 74% 63% 76% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 17 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 105 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B P 18 of 66 Rd 1 ll) 2 1 'r1 4 Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 4 2020: 1 & 3 or 2018: 1 & 2 2020: 3 & 4 Rd Poway Rd K, Map layers ® Plan 105 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 105 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,986 11,944 11,951 11,930 47,811 Deviation from ideal 33 -9 -2 -23 56 • Deviation 0.28% -0.08% -0.02% -0.19% 0.47% Total Pop Hisp 23% 7% 18% 15% 16% % NH White 56% 82% 69% 70% 69% %NH Black 3% 1% 2% 1% 29/o %Asian -American 16% 9% 10% 12% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 8,791 9,137 8,881 9,054 35,863 % Hisp 20% 6% 15% 13% 13% % NH White 60% 83% 72% 72% 72% %NH Black 3% 1% 2% 1% 2% %Asian -American 15% 8% 10% 12% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,668 8,794 8,132 8,643 34,238 % Hisp 17% 6% 13% 13% 12% o 0 0 / NH White 61 / ° o 85 / ° o 71 / ° o ° o 75 / 73 / %NH Black 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 18% 6% 12% 11% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 5,927 8,287 7,018 7,444 28,676 % Latino 13% 5% 9% 10% 9% % Asian -Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 4% 4% % Filipino -Surnamed 2/ 1/ 1/ 2/ 1/ Democratic 27% 23% 23% 26% 25% % Republican 39% 48% 47% 43% 45% % Other 33% 29% 30% 31% 1 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 2,751 5,169 3,965 4,194 16,078 % Latino 10% 3% 6% 8% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 3% 2% 4% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% % Democratic 28% 23% 24% 28% 25% %Republican 48% 54% 52% 49% 51% Other 25% 23% 23% 23% 1 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 4,485 7,106 5,723 6,141 23,456 % Latino 11% 4% 8% 9% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 3% 4% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 13,605 11,872 11,665 12,402 49,545 Age age0-19 30% 25% 26% 26% 27% age20-60 55% 48% 54% 53% 53% age60plus 15% 28% 20% 21% 21% Immigration immigrants 26% 13% 14% 19% 18% naturalized 52% 77% 1 55% 68% 61% Language spoken at home english 63% 84% 83% 76% 76% spanish 20% 6% ° 8% 10% 11% asian-lang 11% 4% 6% 9% 7% other lang 6% 6% 3% 6% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 19% Very Well" 5% 7% 12% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 53% 35% 44% 55% 47% bachelor 24% 35% 33% 26% 29% graduatedegree 11% 26% 16% 13% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 46% 35% 37% 37% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 64% 56% 59% 60% 8% Commute on Public 2% Transit 1% 1% 2% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 139A 12% 8% 11% 11% income 25-50k 18% 11% 16% 14% 159A income 50-75k 15% 9% 13% 14% 13% income 75-200k 46% 44% 49% 50% 47% income 200k -plus 8% 24% 14% 10% 14% Housing Stats single family 73% 93% 88% 80% 83% multi -family 27% 7% 12% 20% 17% rented 36% 17% 22% 30% 26% owned 64% 83% 78% 70% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 19 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 107 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho Bernardo Rd 0 0 I I� I I Poway Rd 4 20 of 66 tt1 C Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 4 2020: 1 & 3 or 2018: 2 & 3 2020: 1 & 4 Other options possible `1_1C _� I Rd Poway Rd 3 Vo Aa Map layers ® Plan 107 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 107 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 12,266 12,081 11,956 11,508 47,811 Deviation from ideal 313 128 3 -445 758 • Deviation 2.62% 1.07% 0.03% -3.72% 6.34% Total Pop Hisp 6% 13% 17% 28% 16% % NH White 83% 70% 70% 52% 69% %NH Black 1% 29/o 2% 39/. 29/o %Asian -American 8% 13% 10% 16% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 9,403 9,127 8,891 8,442 35,863 % Hisp 5% 11% 14% 24% 13% % NH White 85% 72% 74% 56% 72% %NH Black 1% 2% 2% 3% 2% %Asian -American 7% 13% 9% 16% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,979 8,851 8,154 8,254 34,238 % Hisp 5% 12% 13% 21% 12% % NH White 87% 73% 73% 57% 739/. %NH Black 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 6% 12% 11% 18% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 8,631 7,525 7,134 5,386 28,676 % Latino 4% 10% 10% 14% 9% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 4% 3% 5°/ 4% / Filipino -Surnamed 1/ 2/ 2/ 2/ 1/ % Democratic 23% 25% 24% 28% 25% % Republican 49% 43% 45% 39% 45% % Other 28% 32% 31% 33% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 5,445 4,179 3,889 2,565 1 16,078 Latino 3% 7% 7% 10% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 4% 2% 4% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% % Democratic 23% 27% 25% 29% 25% %Republican 54% 49% 52% 47% 51°% % Other 22% 24% 1 24% 24% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 7,484 6,151 5,735 4,087 23,456 %Latino 4% 9% 8% 11% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 4% 3% 5% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 12,033 12,524 11,950 13,037 49,545 Age age0-19 259/o 279/o 28% 289/o 279/o age20-60 48% 539/o 53°/ 569/o 53% age60plus 27% 21% 19% 16% 21% Immigration mmigrants 13% 17% 16% 269/o 18% naturalized 76% 68% 1 55% 53% 61% Language spoken at home english 85% 77% 78% 64% 76% spanish 69/o 9% 12% 19% 11% asian-lang 4% 8% 6% 11% 7% other lang 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 4% Very Well" 10% 10% 19% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 34% 53% 46% 54% 47% bachelor 359/o 279/o 30% 25% 299A graduatedegree 26% 14% 14% 11% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 34% 37% 40% 43% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 559/o 609/o 61% 63% 8% Commute on Public 1% Transit 1% 1% 2% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 11% 12% 10% 13% 11% income 25-50k 11% 149/o 16% 18% 159/. income 50-75k 10% 129/o 14% 17% 139/4 income 75-200k 44% 52% 49% 459/4 479/4 income 200k -plus 24% 11% 12% 8% 14% Housing Stats single family 94% 83% 88% 689A 83% multi -family 6% 17% 12% 32% 17% rented 15% 27% 24% 39% 26% owned 85% 73% 76% 61% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 21 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 108 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B4rnardo Rd Y 2 Poway Rd 22 of 66 tt C Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 4 2020: 1 & 3 or 2018: 2 & 3 2020: 1 & 4 1 6B -'win Peaks Rd Poway Rd i� 3 Vo 10:a Map layers ® Plan 108 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 108 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,315 12,481 12,049 11,966 47,811 Deviation from ideal -638 528 96 13 1,166 %Deviation -5.34% 4.42% 0.80% 0.11% 9.75% Total Pop Hisp 6% 11% 18% 27% 16% % NH White 84% 73% 67% 52% 69% °/ NH Black 1°/ 2% 2% 3% 2% %Asian -American 8% 12% 11% 16% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 8,595 9,583 8,882 8,803 35,863 % Hisp 5% 9% 15% 24% 13% % NH White 85% 75% 71% 56% 72% %NH Black 1% 2% 2% 3% 2% %Asian -American 7% 12% 10% 15% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,040 9,340 8,264 8,595 34,238 % Hisp 7% 7% 15% 21% 12% ° o o799/6 / NH White 86 / ° ° 69 / ° o ° o 58 / 73 / %NH Black 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 6% 11% 11% 18% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 8,142 7,946 6,936 5,652 28,676 % Latino 4% 89/o 11% 14% 9% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 4% 3% 5°/ 4 % Filipino -Surnamed 0/ 2/ 2/ 2/ 1/ % Democratic 22% 25% 25% 28% 25% % Republican 50% 44% 44% 39% 45% % Other 27% 32% 32% 33% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 5,200 4,529 3,648 2,700 1 16,078 Latino 3% 6% 8% 10% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 4% 3°/ 4% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 0% 2% 2% 2% 1% % Democratic 22% 26% 26% 29% 25% Republican 55% 50% 50% 47% 51% Other 22% 24% 1 23% 24% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 7,101 6,544 5,510 4,301 23,456 % Latino 4% 79/. 9% 11% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 4% 3% 5% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 0% 2% 1% 2% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 10,962 12,877 12,183 13,522 49,545 Age age0-19 25% 26% 28°/ 28% 27% age20-60 48% 52°/ 54% 56% 53% age60plus 27% 22% 18% 16% 21% Immigration immigrants 13% 17% 17% 25% 18% naturalized 75% 71% 1 53% 53% 61% Language spoken at home english 86% 78% 77% 65% 76% spanish 69/o 8% 12% 19% 11% asian-lang 3% 8% 7% 11% 7% other lang 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 4% Very Well" 10% 10% 18% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 33% 50% 49% 54% 47% bachelor 369A 28% 29% 259A 29% graduatedegree 28% 16% 12% 11% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 35% 36% 40% 43% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 55% 58% 62% 639/. 8% Commute on Public 1% Transit 2% 1% 2% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 8% 13% 11% 13% 11% income 25-50k 11% 13% 17% 18% 15% income 50-75k 11% 11% 13% 17% 13% income 75-200k 42% 50% 51% 45% 479/4 income 200k -plus 27% 13% 9% 8% 14% Housing Stats single family 97% 83% 86% 69% 83% multi -family 3% 17% 14% 31% 17% rented 11% 26% 27% 38% 26% owned 89% 74% 73% 62% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 23 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 110 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B 3 o Rd 2 Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 3 2020: 1 & 4 or 2018: 3 & 4 2020: 1 & 2 Twin Peaks Rd -Poway Rd H Map layers Plan 110 - Water Area Streets River V� National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 24 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 110 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 12,408 12,001 11,473 11,929 47,811 Deviation from ideal 455 48 -480 -24 935 • Deviation 3.81% 0.40% -4.02% -0.20% 7.82% Total Pop Hisp 15% 7% 16% 26% 16% % NH White 73% 82% 69% 53% 69% %NH Black 2% 1% 2% 39/o 29/o %Asian -American 9% 9% 12% 17% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 9,292 9,189 8,597 8,785 35,863 % Hisp 12% 6% 13% 22% 13% % NH White 76% 83% 72% 57% 72% %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 3% 2% %Asian -American 9% 8% 12% 16% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,630 8,846 8,185 8,577 34,238 % Hisp 11% 7% 12% 20% 12% o 0 0 / NH White 75 / 0 0 84 / 0° 75 / o° o° 58 / 73 / %NH Black 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 11% 6% 11% 19% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 7,750 8,296 6,997 5,633 28,676 % Latino 9% 5% 9% 15°/ 9% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 4% 4% 6% 4% % Filipino -Surnamed 1/ 1/ 2/ 2/ 1/ Democratic 24% 23% 26% 28% 25% % Republican 46% 48% 43% 39% 45% % Other 30% 29% 31% 33% 1 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 4,322 5,174 3,922 2,660 16,078 Latino 79/o 3% 7% 10% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 2% 3% 3% 4% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% % Democratic 24% 23% 27% 29% 25% Republican 52% 54% 49% 48% 51% Other 24% 23% 24% 24% 1 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 6,297 7,113 5,752 4,294 23,456 % Latino 81/ 4% 9% 12% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 3% 4% 5% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 12,207 11,930 11,887 13,520 49,545 Age age0-19 27% 25% 27°/ 28% 27% age20-60 53% 48% 53% 56% 53% age60plus 19% 28% 20% 16% 21% Immigration immigrants 16% 13% 17% 26% 18% naturalized 55% 77% 1 66% 54% 61% Language spoken at home english 80% 84% 78% 63% 76°% spanish 10% 69/o 9% o 20% 11 /o asian-lang 6% 4% 8% 11% 7% other lang 4% 6% 6% 5% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 9% Very Well" 5% 11% 19% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 45% 35% 54% 54% 47% bachelor 31% 35% 27% 25% 29% graduatedegree 16% 26% 14% 11% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 39% 35% 37% 43% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 60% 56% 61% 639/. 8% Commute on Public 1% Transit 1% 1% 2% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 9% 12% 11% 13% 11% income 25-50k 16% 11% 14% 18% 15% income 50-75k 14% 9% 12% 17% 13% income 75-200k 48% 44% 53% 45% 479/4 income 200k -plus 13% 24% 10% 8% 14% Housing Stats single family 89% 93% 82% 699/o 83% multi -family 11% 7% 18% 31% 17% rented 23% 17% 27% 38% 26% owned 77% 83% 73% 62% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 25 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 111 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B4rnardo Rd a 0 0 XC� 3 Poway Rd 3�2� f�n7C%� 26 of 66 Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 3 2020: 1 & 4 or 2018: 1 & 3 2020: 2 & 4 Other options possible Twin Peaks Rd �4 Poway Rd 4 01.04 Map layers ® Plan 111 Water Area Streets 1 River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 27 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 111 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 12,266 11,508 12,081 11,956 47,811 Deviation from ideal 313 -445 128 3 758 • Deviation 2.62% -3.72% 1.07% 0.03% 6.34% Total Pop Hisp 6% 28% 13% 17% 16% % NH White 83% 52% 70% 70% 69% %NH Black 1% 39/o 2% 29/. 29/o %Asian -American 8% 16% 13% 10% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 9,403 8,442 9,127 8,891 35,863 % Hisp 5% 24% 11% 14% 13% % NH White 85% 56% 72% 74% 72% %NH Black 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 7% 16% 13% 9% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,979 8,254 8,851 8,154 34,238 % Hisp 5% 21% 12% 13% 12% %NH White 87% 57% 73% 73% 73% %NH Black 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 6% 18% 12% 11% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 8,631 5,386 7,525 7,134 28,676 % Latino 4% 14% 10% 10% 9% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 5% 4% 3% 4% / Filipino -Surnamed 1/ 2/ 2/ 2/ 1/ % Democratic 23% 28% 25% 24% 25% % Republican 49% 39% 43% 45% 45% % Other 28% 33% 32% 31% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 5,445 1 2,565 4,179 3,889 1 16,078 Latino 3% 10% 7% 7% 6% %Asian -Surnamed 3% 4% 4% 2% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% % Democratic 23% 29% 27% 25% 25% %Republican 54% 47% 49% 52% 51% % Other 22% 24% 1 24% 24% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 7,484 4,087 6,151 5,735 23,456 %Latino 4% 11% 9% 8% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 5% 4% 3% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 12,033 13,037 12,524 11,950 49,545 Age age0-19 259/o 28% 27% 289/o 279/o age20-60 48% 56% 53°/ 53% 53% age60plus 27% 16% 21% 19% 21% Immigration mmigrants 13% 26% 17% 169/o 18% naturalized 76% 53% 1 68% 55% 61% Language spoken at home english 85% 64% 77% 78% 76% spanish 69/o 19% 9% 129/o 11% asian-lang 4% 11% 8% 6% 7% other lang 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 4% 19% 10% 10% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 34% 54% 53% 46% 47% bachelor 359/o 259/o 27% 30% 299A graduatedegree 26% 11% 14% 14% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 34% 43% 37% 40% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 559/o 639/o 60% 619/o 8% Commute on Public 1% 2% Transit 1% 1% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 11% 13% 12% 10% 11% income 25-50k 11% 18% 14% 16% 159/4 income 50-75k 10% 179/o 12% 14% 13% income 75-200k 44% 45% 52% 499/4 47% income 200k -plus 24% 8% 11% 12% 14% Housing Stats single family 94% 68% 83% 88% 83% multi -family 6% 32% 17% 12% 17% rented 15% 39% 27% 24% 26% owned 85% 61% 73% 76% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 27 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 113 City of Poway 2017 Districting li Rancho B4rnardo Rd A tt C 0 28 of 66 1 Twin Peaks Rd B Suggested Election Years 2018: 3 & 4 2020: 1 & 2 or 2018: 1 & 3 2020: 2 & 4 Other options possible Poway Rd 30 gcx�V'i' Map layers ® Plan 113 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 113 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,725 11,846 12,115 12,125 47,811 Deviation from ideal -228 -107 162 172 400 %Deviation -1.91% -0.90% 1.36% 1.44% 3.35% Total Pop Hisp 7% 9% 21% 24% 16% % NH White 82% 76% 64% 55% 69% %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 3% 2% %Asian -American 8% 11% 11% 16% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 8,864 9,084 8,935 8,980 35,863 % Hisp 6% 8% 17% 21% 13% % NH White 84% 78% 68% 58% 72% %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 7% 11% 11% 16% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,343 8,904 8,467 8,524 34,238 % Hisp 8% 8% 15% 19% 12% ° o o / NH White 84 / ° o 78 / ° ° 70 / ° o ° o 59 / 73 / %NH Black 2% 1% 3% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 6% 11% 12% 18% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 8,258 7,854 6,563 6,001 28,676 % Latino 5% 79/o 12% 14% 9% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 4% 3% 5°/ 4% / Filipino -Surnamed 1/ 2/ 2/ 2/ 1/ % Democratic 23% 25% 25% 27% 25% % Republican 49% 45% 42% 40% 45% % Other 28% 30% 32% 33% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 5,105 4,684 3,341 2,947 1 16,078 Latino 3% 5% 9% 10% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 4% 3% 4% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% % Democratic 23% 26% 27% 28% 25% %Republican 54% 51% 49% 49% 51% Other 23% 23% 1 24% 23% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 7,208 6,571 5,030 4,647 23,456 % Latino 5% 6% 10% 11% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 4% 3% 5% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 11,522 11,979 12,459 13,585 49,545 Age age0-19 26% 249/o 29% 289/o 279/o age20-60 509/o 50% 54% 569/o 539/o age60plus 24% 25% 17% 16% 21% Immigration immigrants 12% 17% 18% 259/o 18% naturalized 68% 75% 1 51% 56% 61% Language spoken at home english 85% 79% 75% 66% 76% spanish 79/o 79/o 13% 18% 11% asian-lang 3% 7% 7% 12% 7% other lang 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 4% Very Well" 9% 12% 18% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 36% 46% 51% 55% 47% bachelor 349A 31% 29% 259/o 299A graduatedegree 27% 18% 12% 11% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 36% 34% 41% 42% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 579/o 569/o 63% 639/. 8% Commute on Public 1% Transit 2% 1% 2% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 89/o 14% 11% 12% 11% income 25-50k 11% 12% 17% 17% 15% income 50-75k 12% 11% 13% 16% 13% income 75-200k 44% 48% 51% 46% 479/4 income 200k -plus 25% 14% 8% 9% 14% Housing Stats single family 96% 849/o 83% 71% 83% multi -family 4% 16% 17% 29% 17% rented 13% 26% 28% 36% 26% owned 87% 74% 72% 64% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 29 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 114 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B 3 30 of 66 1 Rd tt C 2 Twin Peaks Rd i L_ Suggested Election Years 2018: 3 & 4 2020: 1 & 2 or 2018: 1 & 3 2020: 2 & 4 -1 8 Poway Rd 4 r S�YipP= Map layers ® Plan 114 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 114 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,996 11,741 11,981 12,093 47,811 Deviation from ideal 43 -212 28 140 352 • Deviation 0.36% -1.77% 0.23% 1.17% 2.94% Total Pop Hisp 8% 12% 20% 22% 16% % NH White 79% 75% 63% 59% 69% %NH Black 2% 1% 2% 29/o 29/o %Asian -American 10% 9% 13% 14% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 9,217 8,800 8,991 8,855 35,863 % Hisp 7% 11% 17% 19% 13% % NH White 81% 78% 66% 63% 72% %NH Black 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 9% 9% 13% 14% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 9,024 8,010 8,604 8,600 34,238 % Hisp 8% 10% 16% 15% 12% %NH White 81% 77% 69% 65% 739/. %NH Black 2% 3% 2% 1% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 8% 10% 12% 16% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 8,201 7,547 6,810 6,118 28,676 Latino 6% 7% 11% 13% 9% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 4% 5% 4% / Filipino -Surnamed 1/ 1/ 2/ 2/ 1/ % Democratic 24% 23% 26% 26% 25% % Republican 47% 48% 42% 41% 45% % Other 29% 29% 32% 33% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 5,054 4,426 3,673 2,925 1 16,078 Latino 49/o 5% 8% 9% 6% %Asian -Surnamed 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% % Democratic 24% 24% 28% 27% 25% Republican 52% 54% 49% 49% 51% Other 23% 22% 1 23% 24% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 7,057 6,184 5,515 4,701 23,456 % Latino 5% 6% 10% 11% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% % Filipino-Sumarned 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 12,004 11,480 12,552 13,509 49,545 Age age0-19 24% 269/o 27°/ 30% 279/o age20-60 499/o 52% 54% 559/o 539/o age60plus 28% 22% 18% 15% 21% Immigration immigrants 15% 14% 19% 259/o 18% naturalized 75% 59% 1 68% 49% 61% Language spoken at home english 83% 83% 75% 64% 76% spanish 6% 89/o 10% 209/o 11% asian-lang 5% 5% 10% 10% 7% other lang 7% 3% 4% 7% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 6% Very Well" 7% 12% 18% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 39% 40% 57% 51% 47% bachelor 34% 329/o 25% 269/o 29% graduatedegree 22% 21% 12% 11% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 33% 38% 38% 46% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 569/o 589/o 61% 649/ 8% Commute on Public 2% Transit 1% 1% 2% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 14% 8% 10% 13% 11% income 25-50k 11% 15% 15% 17% 15% income 50-75k 9% 13% 14% 15% 13% income 75-200k 46% 44% 51% 47% 479/4 income 200k -plus 20% 19% 10% 7% 14% Housing Stats single family 88% 88% 82% 75% 83% multi -family 12% 12% 18% 25% 17% rented 22% 19% 27% 36% 26% owned 78% 81% 73% 64% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 31 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 115 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B4rna Y 2 32 of 66 l \ 3 L i I 4 tt C -'win Peaks Rd Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 4 2020: 1 & 3 1 Poway Rd oVIay - 'SMap layers ® Plan 115 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 115 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,882 12,132 11,543 12,254 47,811 Deviation from ideal -71 179 -410 301 711 • Deviation -0.59% 1.50% -3.43% 2.52% 5.95% Total Pop Hisp 17% 20% 8% 18% 16% % NH White 67% 63% 80% 67% 69% %NH Black 2% 2% 11/. 29/o 2% %Asian -American 12% 13% 10% 11% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 8,830 9,116 8,880 9,037 35,863 % Hisp 15% 17% 6% 15% 13% % NH White 70% 66% 82% 70% 72% %NH Black 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %Asian -American 12% 13% 9% 11% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,427 8,763 8,560 8,488 34,238 % Hisp 12% 16% 7% 14% 12% ° ° ° / NH White 70 / ° ° 69 / o ° 82 / ° ° 71 / 73% % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 15% 13% 7% 11% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 6,919 7,012 7,797 6,949 28,676 %Latino 9% 11% 5% 100/ 9o/ % Asian -Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 3% 4% % Filipino -Surnamed 1/ 2/ 1/ 2/ 1/ Democratic 24% 26% 24% 25% 25% % Republican 45% 42% 47% 44% 45% % Other 30% 32% 29% 31% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 3,761 3,802 4,850 3,666 16,078 % Latino 6% 8% 4% 7% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 3°/ 4°/ 3% 39/ 39/ % Filiino-Sumarned 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% Democratic 24% 28% 25% 26% 25% % Republican 53% 49% 53% 51% 51% %Other 23% 24% 1 23% 24% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 5,450 5,681 6,814 5,511 23,456 % Latino 8% 10% 5% 8% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 12,712 12,714 11,499 12,620 49,545 Age age0-19 289/o 279/o 24% 289/o 27 age20-60 559/o 549/o 48% 539/o 53% age60plus 18% 19% 28% 19% 21% Immigration immigrants 21% 19% 14% 18% 18% naturalized 51% 68% 1 77% 53% 61 Language spoken at home english 71% 75% 83% 75% 76% spanish 15% 11% 6% 13% 11% asian-lang 8% 10% 5% 7% 7% other lang 6% 4% 7% 5% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 14% Very Well" 12% 6% 12% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 46% 58% 38% 47% 47% bachelor 309/o 25% 34% 299/o 29% graduatedegree 17% 12% 23% 14% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 41% 38% 34% 41% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 61% 61% 559/o 629/o 8% Commute on Public 2% Transit 1% 2% 1% 29 Household Income income 0-25k 11% 10% 14% 11% 11% income 25-50k 15% 15% 11% 17% 15% income 50-75k 159A 15% 9% 13% 13% income 75-200k 46% 51% 46% 47% 47% income 200k -plus 14% 10% 21% 12% 14% Housing Stats single family 79% 82% 89% 83% 83% multi -family 21% 18% 11% 17% 17% rented 30% 28% 20% 27% 26% owned 70% 72% 80% 73% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 33 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 116 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B4rnardo Rd li 4 2 P 34 of 66 Twin Peaks Rd 1 Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 4 2020: 1 & 3 Poway Rd s4°`Nay � gcri'�'Q Map layers Plan 116 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 116 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,873 11,655 11,729 12,554 47,811 Deviation from ideal -80 -298 -224 601 899 • Deviation -0.67% -2.49% -1.87% 5.03% 7.52% Total Pop Hisp 15% 20% 15% 13% 16% % NH White 72% 59% 70% 75% 69% • NH Black 2% 2% 2% 29/o 2% %Asian -American 9% 17% 11% 9% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 8,885 8,775 8,882 9,321 35,863 Hisp 13% 18% 13% 10% 13% % NH White 75% 62% 73% 78% 72% %NH Black 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 9% 17% 11% 9% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,220 8,323 8,979 8,716 34,238 % Hisp 11% 17% 9% 12% 12% / NH White 75/ 61/ 76/ 79/ 73/ % NH Black 3% 3% 0% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 11% 18% 12% 5% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 7,501 6,345 6,916 7,914 28,676 Latino 9% 12% 100/ 60/ 9o/ % Asian -Surnamed 3% 6% 4°/ 4% 4°/ % Filipino -Surnamed 1/ 2/ 1/ 1/ 1/ Democratic 23% 27% 26% 24% 25% % Republican 46% 41% 43% 47% 45% % Other 30% 32% 32% 29% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 4,160 3,336 3,788 4,795 16,078 % Latino 7% 9% 6% 3% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 2% 5°/ 3% 3% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% Democratic 24% 28% 26% 25% 25% % Republican 53% 50% 49% 53% 51% % Other 23% 22% 25% 23% 1 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 6,012 5,113 5,511 6,819 23,456 % Latino 8% 10% 8% 6% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 5% 4% 3% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 11,694 12,532 12,709 12,610 49,545 Age age0-19 27% 26% 27% 279/o 27 age20-60 549/o 549/o 53% 499/o 53% age60plus 19% 20% 19% 24% 21% Immigration immigrants 16% 23% 21% 149/o 18% naturalized 55% 68% 1 53% 68% 61 Language spoken at home english 80% 70% 72% 82% 76% spanish 11% 14% ° 13% 7% 11% asian-lang 6% 12% 8% 5% 7% other lang 4% 5% 7% 6% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 9% Very Well" 14% 14% 6% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 46% 54% 49% 39% 47% bachelor 31% 25% 29% 33% 29% graduatedegree 15% 13% 14% 24% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 38% 39% 39% 38% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 60% 60% 61% 599/o 8% Commute on Public 1% Transit 2% 2% 1% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 9% 11% 15% 10% 11% income 25-50k 16% 14% 16% 12% 15% income 50-75k 14% 17% 11% 10% 13% income 75-200k 49% 46% 48% 46% 47% income 200k -plus 13% 11% 10% 21% 14% Housing Stats single family 89% 77% 75% 92% 83% multi -family 11% 23% 25% 8% 17% rented 23% 33% 33% 16% 26% owned 77% 67% 67% 84% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 35 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 117 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B 36 of 66 4 Rd i 7) 3 �d 1 Powa Rd � C � �h�lll _ >-;� 1�p 2 ■o Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 3 2020: 1 & 4 1 6� Peaks Rd Poway Rd ps4 Map layers ® Plan 117 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 117 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,634 11,798 12,188 12,191 47,811 Deviation from ideal -319 -155 235 238 557 • Deviation -2.67% -1.30% 1.97% 1.99% 4.66% Total Pop Hisp 16% 20% 19% 8% 16% % NH White 69% 60% 68% 799/o 699/o • NH Black 29/o 29/. 2% 29/o 29/o %Asian -American 11% 16% 10% 9% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 8,619 8,898 9,025 9,321 35,863 Hisp 13% 17% 16% 7% 13% % NH White 73% 63% 71% 81% 72% %NH Black 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 11% 16% 10% 9% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,292 8,359 8,460 9,127 34,238 % Hisp 11% 17% 15% 8% 12% % NH White 72% 64% 72% 82°/ 73°/ % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 13% 17% 10% 7% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 6,787 6,469 7,025 8,395 28,676 % Latino 9% 12% 10% 6% 9% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 6% 3% 4% 4% % Filipino -Surnamed 1/ 2/ 2/ 1/ 1/ Democratic 24% 27% 25% 24% 25% % Republican 45% 41% 44% 47% 45% % Other 30% 32% 31% 29% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 3,704 3,397 3,779 5,198 16,078 % Latino 6% 9% 7% 4% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 3°/ 5°/ 2% 39/ 39/ %Filipino-Sumarned 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% Democratic 24% 28% 26% 24% 25% % Republican 52% 50% 50% 53% 51% Other 24% 23% 23% 23% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 5,454 5,212 1 5,638 7,152 23,456 % Latino 7% 10% 8% 5% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 5% 3% 3% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 12,364 12,699 12,273 12,208 49,545 Age age0-19 289/o 279/o 28% 249/o 27 age20-60 549/o 559/o 53% 499/o 53% age60plus 18% 18% 19% 27% 21% Immigration immigrants 21% 22% 15% 14% 18% naturalized 53% 65% 1 54% 73% 61 Language spoken at home english 71% 70% 80% 83% 76% spanish 16% 14% 10% 5% 11% asian-lang 7% 12% 6% 4% 7% other lang 6% 4% 4% 7% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 14% Very Well" 15% 9% 6% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 46% 56% 47% 39% 47% bachelor 28% 259/o 31% 349/o 29% graduatedegree 17% 12% 15% 22% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 42% 40% 40% 32% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 60% 629/o 62% 569/o 8% Commute on Public 2% Transit 1% 1% 2% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 11% 10% 10% 14% 11% income 25-50k 16% 15% 17% 11% 15% income 50-75k 169A 16% 129/o 8% 13% income 75-200k 44% 48% 50% 47% 47% income 200k -plus 14% 10% 12% 20% 14% Housing Stats single family 82% 78% 859/o 89% 83% multi -family 18% 22% 15% 11% 17% rented 27% 32% 24% 22% 26% owned 73% 68% 76% 78% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 37 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 118 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B x J Pd IL 38 of 66 2 , 3 �7 0 -'win Peaks Rd J T i —F -L Suggested Election Years 2018: 1 & 3 2020: 2 & 4 Poway Rd r' io�a�'/> ScYi1'�'S Map layers ® Plan 118 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 118 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,877 11,839 12,010 12,085 47,811 Deviation from ideal -76 -114 57 132 246 • Deviation -0.64% -0.95% 0.48% 1.10% 2.06% Total Pop Hisp 20% 13% 15% 14% 16% % NH White 60% 74% 70% 73% 69% %NH Black 29/o 29/o 2% 1% 29/o %Asian -American 16% 10% 11% 10% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 9,018 9,017 8,856 8,972 35,863 Hisp 17% 11% 13% 12% 13% % NH White 63% 77% 73% 75% 72% %NH Black 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% %Asian -American 16% 9o/ 11°/ 9o/ 110/ Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,603 8,941 8,450 8,244 34,238 % Hisp 16% 8% 15% 10% 12% o o° / NH White 64 / o° 80 / o° 72 / o°739/o 75 / %NH Black 3% 1% 2% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 16% 9% 10% 12% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 6,585 7,433 7,170 7,488 28,676 % Latino 12% 7% 8% 9% 9% % Asian -Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 3% 4% % Filipino -Surnamed ino-Surnamed 2/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ Democratic 26% 24% 25% 24% 25% % Republican 41% 46% 45% 46% 45% % Other 32% 30% 30% 30% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 3,493 4,406 4,029 4,150 16,078 % Latino 9% 4% 5% 79/o 6% Asian -Surnamed 49/o 39/o 3% 29/o 39/ % Filipino -Surnamed 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% Democratic 27% 25% 27% 24% 25% %Republican 49% 52% 51% 52% 51% Other 24% 23% 1 22% 24% 1 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 5,268 6,123 6,119 5,947 23,456 % Latino 10% 6% 7% 8 / 8 % Asian -Surnamed 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 12,736 12,389 12,529 11,890 49,545 Age age0-19 269/o 269/o 28% 279/o 27 age20-60 549/o 519/o 52% 549/o 53°/ age60plus 20% 23% 20% 19% 21% Immigration immigrants 22% 18% 17% 169/o 189/o naturalized 67% 60% 1 57% 57% 61 Language spoken at home english 71% 77% 77% 79% 76% Spanish 149/o 10 % 111/6 10 % 11 asian-lang 11% 6% 6% 6% 7% other lang 5% 6% 6% 4% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 14% Very Well" 10% 11% 9% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 56% 42% 45% 45% 47% bachelor 24% 33% 29% 31% 29% graduatedegree 12% 19% 19% 16% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 38% 36% 41% 39% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 609/o 599/o 61% 609/o 8% Commute on Public 2% Transit 2% 2% 1% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 129/o 149/o 11% 9% 11% income 25-50k 159/o 149/o 15% 15% 15% income 50-75k 169/o 10% 11% 14% 13% income 75-200k 47% 46% 47% 49% 47% income 200k -plus 10% 16% 15% 14% 14% Housing Stats single family 78% 82% 84% 90% 83% multi -family 22% 18% 16% 10% 17% rented 32% 26% 24% 229/. 269/o owned 68% 74% 76% 78% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 39 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 119 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B4rnardo Rd N 4 P C t C Suggested Election Years 2018: 1 & 3 2020: 2 & 4 or 2018: 2 & 3 2020: 1 & 4 Other options possible 67 1 'win Peaks Rd Poway Rd --- 30 gcriiy Map layers ® Plan 119 Water Area ��--- �� Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 40 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 119 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,967 12,017 11,873 11,954 47,811 Deviation from ideal 14 64 -80 1 144 %Deviation 0.12% 0.54% -0.67% 0.01% 1.20% Total Pop Hisp 8% 10% 21% 24% 16% % NH White 82% 76% 64% 55% 69% %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 39/. 29/o %Asian -American 8% 11% 11% 16% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 9,044 9,212 8,755 8,852 35,863 %Hisp 7% 8% 17% 21% 13% % NH White 84% 78% 68% 58% 72% %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 7% 11% 11% 16% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,525 9,019 8,285 8,409 34,238 % Hisp 8% 8% 15% 19% 12% % NH White 84% 78°/ 70% 599/ 739/ %NH Black 2% 1% 3% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 6% 11% 12% 18% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 8,407 7,941 6,414 5,914 28,676 Latino 5% 7% 12% 14% 9% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 4% 3% 5% 4% / Filipino -Surnamed 1/ 2/ 2/ 2/ 1/ % Democratic 23% 25% 25% 27% 25% % Republican 49% 45% 42% 40% 45% % Other 28% 30% 32% 33% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 5,196 4,731 3,251 2,901 16,078 Latino 3% 59/o 9% 10% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 4% 3% 4% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% % Democratic 23% 26% 27% 28% 25% %Republican 54% 51% 49% 49% 51% % Other 23% 23% 1 24% 23% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 7,334 6,643 4,904 4,575 23,456 % Latino 5% 6% 10% 11% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 4% 3% 5% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 11,757 12,163 12,224 13,401 49,545 Age age0-19 26% 24% 29% 28% 27% age20-60 50°/ 50% 54% 56°/ 53% age60plus 24% 25% 17% 16% 21% Immigration mmigrants 12% 17% 18% 25% 18% naturalized 68% 75% 1 51% 56% 61% Language spoken at home english 85% 79% 75% 66% 76 spanish 7% 7% 13% 18% 11% asian-lang 3% 7% 7% 12% 7% other lang 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 4% Very Well" 9% 12% 18% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 36% 46% 51% 54% 47% bachelor 34% 30% 28% 25% 299A graduatedegree 26% 17% 11% 11% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 36% 34% 41% 42% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 57% 56% 63% 63% 8% Commute on Public 1% Transit 2% 1% 2% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 8% 14% 11% 12% 11% income 25-50k 11% 12% 18% 17% 15% income 50-75k 12% 11% 13% 16% 13% income 75-200k 45% 48% 50% 469/4 47% income 200k -plus 25% 14% 8% 9% 14% Housing Stats single family 96% 84% 83% 71% 83% multi -family 4% 16% 17% 29% 17% rented 13% 26% 29% 36% 26% owned 87% 74% 71% 64% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 41 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 120 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B a /I P 42 of 66 Rd 3 M 0 2 Suggested Election Years 2018: 1 & 3 2020: 2 & 4 or 2018: 2 & 3 2020: 1 & 4 Other options possible 67 4 Twin Peaks Rd -Poway Rd okay > - Map layers ® Plan 120 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 120 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,932 12,139 12,458 11,282 47,811 Deviation from ideal -21 186 505 -671 1,176 %Deviation -0.18% 1.56% 4.22% -5.61% 9.84% Total Pop Hisp 25% 21% 10% 6% 16% % NH White 55% 64% 75% 84% 69% %NH Black 3% 2% 11/. 1% 2% %Asian -American 16% 11% 12% 8% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 8,868 8,917 9,552 8,526 35,863 % Hisp 22% 17% 9% 5% 13% % NH White 58% 68% 77% 85% 72% %NH Black 3% 2% 1% 1% 2% %Asian -American 16% 11% 11% 7% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,750 8,103 9,452 7,934 34,238 % Hisp 19% 15% 10% 6% 12% o 0 0 / NH White 59 / 0 0 71 / 0° 77 / o 0 0 0 86 / 73 / %NH Black 2% 3% 1% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 18% 11% 11% 6% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 5,879 6,637 8,033 8,127 28,676 %Latino 14% 11% 8% 49 9% % Asian -Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 4% 4% / Filipino -Surnamed 2/ 2/ 2/ 1/ 1/ Democratic 28% 25% 25% 22% 25% % Republican 39% 43% 45% 50% 45% % Other 33% 32% 31% 27% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 2,814 3,433 4,702 5,129 16,078 % Latino 10% 8% 6% 3% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 4°/ 3°/ 4% 3°/ 39/ % Filipino -Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 0% 1% Democratic 28% 27% 26% 23% 25% % Republican 47% 50% 50% 56% 51% % Other 24% 23% 1 24% 22% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 4,487 5,132 6,781 7,057 23,456 % Latino 12% 9% 7% 4% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 5% 3% 3% 3% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 0% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 13,511 12,356 12,721 10,957 49,545 Age age0-19 289/o 299/o 25% 259/o 27 age20-60 569/o 549/o 52% 489/o 53% age60plus 16% 17% 24% 26% 21% Immigration immigrants 26% 17% 17% 139/o 189/o naturalized 54% 52% 1 71% 75% 61 Language spoken at home english 64% 77% 79% 86% 76% spanish 19% 129/o 8% 69/o 11% asian-lang 12% 7% 7% 4% 7% other lang 5% 5% 6% 5% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 18% Very Well" 11% 9% 4% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 54% 51% 48% 34% 47% bachelor 259/o 299/o 28% 369/o 29% graduatedegree 11% 12% 17% 27% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 43% 41% 35% 35% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 639/o 639/o 57% 569/o 8% Commute on Public 2% Transit 1% 2% 1% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 13% 11% 13% 9% 11% income 25-50k 18% 17% 13% 11% 15% income 50-75k 17% 12% 11% 11% 13% income 75-200k 45% 52% 49% 43% 47% income 200k -plus 8% 8% 14% 26% 14% Housing Stats single family 69% 85% 83% 97% 83% multi -family 31% 15% 17% 3% 17% rented 38% 27% 27% 12% 26% owned 62% 73% 73% 88% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 43 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 121 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B$rnaq Rd 0 Oft A� T 1 � 0 0 2 Twin Rd Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 3 2020: 1 & 4 Poway Rd Map layers Plan 121 Water Area Streets River v--� National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 44 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 121 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,648 12,341 11,633 12,189 47,811 Deviation from ideal -305 388 -320 236 708 • Deviation -2.55% 3.25% -2.68% 1.97% 5.92% Total Pop Hisp 21% 18% 12% 12% 16% % NH White 63% 66% 72% 75% 69% • NH Black 2% 2% 2% 29/o 2% %Asian -American 12% 12% 13% 9% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 8,634 9,204 8,800 9,225 35,863 % Hisp 17% 15% 11% 10% 13% % NH White 67% 70% 74% 78% 72% %NH Black 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %Asian -American 12% 12% 12% 9% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,651 8,611 8,523 8,453 34,238 % Hisp 13% 14% 11% 11% 12% o 0 0 / NH White 69 / 0 0 71 / 0° 74 / o 0 0 0 78 / 73 / % NH Black 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 14% 13% 12% 7% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 6,330 7,189 7,339 7,819 28,676 % Latino 12% 9% 8% 79 9% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 4% 5% 4% 4% % Filipino -Surnamed 2/ 1/ 2/ 1/ 1/ Democratic 26% 25% 24% 24% 25% % Republican 41% 44% 45% 47% 45% % Other 33% 31% 30% 29% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 3,172 3,956 4,262 4,688 16,078 % Latino 8% 7% 6% 5% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 3°/ 3°/ 4% 3°/ 39/ % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% Democratic 27% 25% 25% 25% 25% % Republican 49% 50% 52% 53% 51% %Other 24% 24% 1 23% 22% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 4,935 5,805 5,875 6,841 23,456 % Latino 10% 8% 7% 69/o 8% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 12,358 12,972 11,719 12,496 49,545 Age age0-19 289/o 289/o 24% 27% 27 age20-60 559/o 549/o 51% 51% 53% age60plus 17% 18% 25% 23% 21% Immigration immigrants 20% 20% 17% 179/o 189/o naturalized 49% 60% 1 71% 65% 61 Language spoken at home english 74% 73% 79% 78% 76% spanish 13% 13% 8% 10% 11% asian-lang 8% 9% 6% 6% 7% other lang 4% 5% 7% 6% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 14% Very Well" 13% 8% 9% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 52% 51% 44% 41% 47% bachelor 28% 26% 31% 32% 29% graduatedegree 11% 15% 19% 21% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 40% 41% 34% 38% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 64% 61% 57% 589/o 8% Commute on Public 1% Transit 1% 2% 1% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 11% 10% 13% 11% 11% income 25-50k 19% 16% 11% 13% 159A income 50-75k 139A 14% 13% 12% 139/o income 75-200k 49% 48% 47% 459/o 479A income 200k -plus 8% 12% 16% 19% 14% Housing Stats single family 7690 86% 84% 88% 83% multi -family 24% 14% 16% 12% 17% rented 31% 24% 28% 21% 269/. owned 69% 76% 72% 79% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 45 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 122 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 3 2020: 1 & 4 or 1 2018: 1 & 3 2020: 2 & 4 Other options possible Poway Rd b 3 2 Twin Peaks Rd Poway Rd Map layers ® Plan 122 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 46 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 122 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,920 11,687 12,274 11,930 47,811 Deviation from ideal -33 -266 321 -23 587 %Deviation -0.28% -2.23% 2.69% -0.19% 4.91% Total Pop Hisp 9% 9% 24% 20% 16% % NH White 76% 78% 58% 659/o 699/o %NH Black 29/o 1% 2% 29/o 29/o %Asian -American 11% 10% 14% 12% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 9,102 8,741 9,150 8,870 35,863 % Hisp 8% 8% 21% 16% 13% % NH White 78% 81% 62% 68% 72% %NH Black 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 11% 9% 13% 12% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,887 8,132 8,896 8,324 34,238 % Hisp 7% 10% 18% 14% 12% ° o o799/o / NH White 80 / 64 / ° °699/o ° o 73 / %NH Black 2% 2% 1% 3% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 10% 8% 15% 13% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 8,002 7,737 6,085 6,852 28,676 Latino 7% 69/o 14% 110/ 9o/ % Asian -Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 3% 4% % Filipino -Surnamed 1/ 1/ 2/ 2/ 1/ Democratic 24% 23% 27% 25% 25% % Republican 46% 48% 41% 43% 45% % Other 30% 29% 32% 32% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 4,839 4,642 2,981 3,617 16,078 % Latino 5% 4% 10% 7% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% % Filiino-Sumarned 1% 0% 2% 2% 1% % Democratic 25% 24% 28% 26% 25% % Republican 52% 53% 48% 51% 51% Other 23% 23% 24% 23% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 6,577 6,715 1 4,708 5,457 23,456 % Latino 6% 5% 11% 9% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 4% 3% 3 % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 11,960 11,622 13,730 12,233 49,545 Age age0-19 24% 27% 28% 289/o 27 age20-60 509/o 509/o 56% 559/o 53% age60plus 26% 23% 16% 18% 21% Immigration immigrants 16% 14% 25% 17% 18% naturalized 76% 69% 1 53% 54% 61% Language spoken at home english 81% 80% 65% 79% 76 spanish 79/o 9% 19% 9% 11% asian-lang 6% 5% 10% 8% 7% other lang 6% 6% 6% 3% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 7% Very Well" 7% 17% 11% 11 Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 43% 38% 54% 52% 47% bachelor 32% 31% 26% 29% 29% graduatedegree 20% 24% 10% 12% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 33% 39% 43% 38% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 56% 579/o 63% 639/. 8% Commute on Public 2% Transit 1% 2% 1% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 13% 10% 13% 10% 11% income 25-50k 12% 11% 17% 18% 15% income 50-75k 11% 12% 17% 11% 13% income 75-200k 46% 46% 46% 51% 479/. income 200k -plus 18% 22% 7% 10% 14% Housing Stats single family 87% 959/o 71% 81% 839/o multi -family 13% 5% 29% 19% 17% rented 23% 16% 38% 26% 26% owned 77% 84% 62% 74% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 47 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 123 City of Poway 2017 Districting 2 Rancho B4rnardo Rd i ��7 CI _1111 �i �N 48 of 66 Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 4 2020: 1 & 3 or 2018: 3 & 4 2020: 1 & 2 t C _'win Peaks Rd Poway Rd �1 Map layers ® Plan 123 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 123 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,776 11,938 11,954 12,143 47,811 Deviation from ideal -177 -15 1 190 367 %Deviation -1.48% -0.13% 0.01% 1.59% 3.07% Total Pop Hisp 16% 6% 26% 15% 16% % NH White 71% 83% 54% 689/o 699/o %NH Black 1% 1% 3% 29/o 29/o %Asian -American 10% 8% 1 15% 13% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 8,792 9,158 8,685 9,228 35,863 % Hisp 13% 5% 22% 13% 13% % NH White 74% 85% 58% 70% 72% %NH Black 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% %Asian -American 9% 7% 15% 13% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,092 8,769 8,467 8,910 34,238 % Hisp 12% 6% 18% 13% 12% ° o o / NH White 73 / ° o 86 / ° °729/o739/o 60 / %NH Black 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 12% 5% 18% 12% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 7,172 8,362 5,757 7,385 28,676 Latino 10% 4% 13% 100/ 9o/ % Asian -Surnamed 3% 4% 5% 4% 4% % Filipino -Surnamed 1/ 1/ 2/ 2/ 1/ Democratic 23% 23% 27% 26% 25% % Republican 46% 49% 39% 43% 45% % Other 30% 28% 33% 31% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 3,954 5,298 2,667 4,159 16,078 % Latino 7% 3% 9% 81/o 69/b % Asian -Surnamed 2°/ 3°/ 3% 4°/ 3% % Filiino-Sumarned 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% Democratic 25% 23% 29% 27% 25% % Republican 53% 54% 47% 50% 51% % Other 23% 23% 24% 23% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 5,801 7,231 1 4,357 6,067 23,456 % Latino 8% 4% 11% 9% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% % Filipino-Sumarned 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 11,541 11,847 13,513 12,643 49,545 Age age0-19 279/o 259/o 30% 269/o 27% age20-60 54% 479/o 55% 539/o 53% age60plus 19% 28% 15% 21% 21% Immigration immigrants 15% 13% 25% 19% 18% naturalized 53% 77% 1 50% 71% 61 Language spoken at home english 82% 84% 64% 75% 76% spanish 9% 69/o 19% 10% 11% asian-lang 6% 4% 10% 9% 7% other lang 4% 6% 6% 5% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 8% Very Well" 5% 19% 11% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 46% 34% 53% 54% 47% bachelor 329/o 35% 25% 269/o 299/o graduatedegree 15% 26% 11% 14% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 37% 35% 45% 36% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 60% 569/o 64% 599/o 8% Commute on Public 1% Transit 1% 2% 2% 29 Household Income income 0-25k 8% 12% 13% 12% 11% income 25-50k 16% 11% 18% 13% 159/o income 50-75k 13% 9% 15% 14% 13% income 75-200k 50% 44% 47% 499/o 479/o income 200k -plus 12% 25% 7% 11% 14% Housing Stats single family 87% 939/o 72% 81% 83% multi -family 13% 7% 28% 19% 17% rented 23% 15% 36% 30% 26% owned 77% 85% 64% 70% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 49 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 124 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho Brnardo Rd � /-,P-] i H �� tt C 2 Twin Peaks Rd 3 Suggested Election Years 2018: 1 & 4 2020: 2 & 3 or 2018: 1 & 3 2020: 2 & 4 Poway Rd �o gCilpps Map layers ® Plan 124 Water Area i Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 50 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 124 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,953 11,824 11,942 12,092 47,811 Deviation from ideal 0 -129 -11 139 268 • Deviation 0.00% -1.08% -0.09% 1.16% 2.24% Total Pop Hisp 10% 6% 21% 25% 16% % NH White 75% 84% 64% 54% 69% %NH Black 2% 1% 2% 3% 2% %Asian -American 12% 8% 11% 16% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 9,173 8,987 8,723 8,980 35,863 % Hisp 9% 5% 18% 22% 13% % NH White 77% 85% 68% 58% 72% %NH Black 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 11% 7% 11% 16% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 9,021 8,439 7,922 8,856 34,238 % Hisp 9% 6% 15% 19% 12% o 0 0 / NH White 78 / 0 0 85 / 0° 69 / o 0 0 0 59 / 73 / %NH Black 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 10% 6% 12% 18% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 7,740 8,489 6,493 5,954 28,676 Latino 8% 4% 11% 140/ 9o/ % Asian -Surnamed 4% 4% 3% 5% 4% / Filipino -Surnamed 2/ 1/ 2/ 2/ 1/ Democratic 25% 23% 24% 28% 25% % Republican 44% 50% 44% 39% 45% % Other 31% 27% 32% 33% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 4,459 1 5,397 3,378 2,844 1 16,078 % Latino 6% 3% 8% 10% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 3% 3% 4% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 2% 0% 2% 2% 1% % Democratic 26% 23% 26% 29% 25% Republican 50% 55% 50% 48% 51% %Other 24% 22% 24% 24% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 6,378 7,380 5,140 4,558 23,456 % Latino 7% 4% 10% 12% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 3% 3% 5% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 0% 1% 2% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 12,307 11,469 12,090 13,679 49,545 Age age0-19 26% 25% 29% 289/o 279/o age20-60 529/o 489/o 54% 569/o 53% age60plus 23% 26% 17% 16% 21% Immigration tnmigrants 16% 13% 17% 26% 18% naturalized 70% 74% 1 52% 55% 61% Language spoken at home english 79% 86% 77% 64% 76% spanish 79/o 69/o 12% 19% 11% asian-lang 7% 4% 7% 12% 7% other lang 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 9% Very Well" 4% 11% 19% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 49% 33% 50% 55% 47% bachelor 28% 369/o 29% 259/o 29% graduatedegree 17% 27% 12% 11% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 35% 35% 41% 43% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 589/o 569/o 63% 639/. 8% Commute on Public 2% Transit 1% 1% 2% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 13% 9% 11% 13% 11% income 25-50k 13% 11% 17% 17% 15% income 50-75k 10% 11% 13% 18% 13% income 75-200k 51% 42% 51% 44% 479/. income 200k -plus 13% 27% 8% 8% 14% Housing Stats single family 84% 969/o 86% 689/o 839/o multi -family 16% 4% 14% 32% 17% rented 26% 12% 27% 39% 26% owned 74% 88% 73% 61% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 51 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 125 1� Cit of Poway Y 2017 Districting Suggested Election Years 2018: 1 & 3 2020: 2 & 4 Map layers ® Plan 125 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 52 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 125 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,689 11,996 12,165 11,961 47,811 Deviation from ideal -264 43 212 8 476 %Deviation -2.21% 0.36% 1.77% 0.07% 3.98% Total Pop Hisp 20% 7% 14% 22% 16% % NH White 63% 83% 71% 59% 69% %NH Black 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 13% 8% 11% 14% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 8,799 9,070 9,242 8,752 35,863 % Hisp 17% 6% 12% 19% 13% % NH White 66% 85% 74% 63% 72% %NH Black 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 13% 7% 11% 14% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,470 8,508 8,776 8,485 34,238 % Hisp 16% 6% 12% 16% 12% / NH White 68/ 85/ 73/ 65/ 73/ %NH Black 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 13% 7% 11% 16% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 6,739 8,587 7,358 5,992 28,676 %Latino 11% 5% 8% 1390 9% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 4 % 3°/ 5 % 4 % / Filipino -Surnamed 2/ 1/ 2/ 2/ 1/ Democratic 27% 22% 25% 26% 25% % Republican 42% 50% 45% 41% 45% % Other 32% 28% 31% 33% 1 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 3,659 5,428 4,132 2,859 16,078 % Latino 8% 3% 6% 10% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 4°/ 3°/ 3% 39/ 39/ % Filipino -Surnamed 2% 0% 2% 1% 1% Democratic 28% 22% 26% 27% 25% % Republican 49% 55% 50% 49% 51% % Other 23% 23% 23% 24% 1 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 5,462 7,436 5,958 4,601 23,456 % Latino 10% 5% 7% 11% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 3% 4% 3% Filipino -Surnamed 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 12,259 11,613 12,290 13,383 49,545 Age age0-19 279/o 259/o 25% 30% 27 age20-60 549/o 49% 51% 55% 53% age60plus 19% 26% 24% 15% 21% Immigration immigrants 19% 13% 16% 259/o 18% naturalized 69% 74% 1 61% 49% 61 Language spoken at home english 74% 86% 81% 64% 76% spanish 11% 69/o ° 8% 20% 11% asian-lang 11% 4% 6% 10% 7% other lang 4% 5% 5% 7% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 12% Very Well" 4% 9% 18% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 58% 34% 44% 51% 47% bachelor 259/o 369/o 30% 269/o 29% graduatedegree 12% 26% 18% 11% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 38% 35% 36% 46% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 61% 569/o 58% 64% 8% Commute on Public 1% Transit 1% 2% 2% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 10% 8% 14% 13% 11% income 25-50k 15% 11% 15% 17% 15% income 50-75k 15% 12% 10% 15% 13% income 75-200k 51% 44% 48% 47% 47% income 200k -plus 10% 25% 14% 7% 14% Housing Stats single family 82% 97% 81% 74% 83% multi -family 18% 3% 19% 26% 17% rented 28% 12% 27% 36% 26% owned 72% 88% 73% 64% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 53 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 126 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B Rd Suggested Election Years 2018: 1 & 3 2020: 2 & 4 0 o r 7d C � 67 ��J 3 Twin Peaks Rd Poway Rd JL "'sway Rd 4 gcxl,�,�s Map layers ® Plan 126 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 54 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 126 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,897 11,996 11,957 11,961 47,811 Deviation from ideal -56 43 4 8 99 • Deviation -0.47% 0.36% 0.03% 0.07% 0.83% Total Pop Hisp 20% 7% 14% 22% 16% % NH White 63% 83% 72% 59% 69% %NH Black 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 13% 8% 11% 14% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 8,963 9,070 9,078 8,752 35,863 % Hisp 17% 6% 12% 19% 13% % NH White 66% 85% 74% 63% 72% %NH Black 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 14% 7% 10% 14% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,646 8,508 8,600 8,485 34,238 % Hisp 16% 6% 12% 16% 12% / NH White 68/ 85/ 73/ 65/ 73/ %NH Black 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 14% 7% 10% 16% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 6,883 8,587 7,214 5,992 28,676 %Latino 11% 5% 8% 1390 9% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 4 % 3°/ 5 % 4 % / Filipino -Surnamed 2/ 1/ 2/ 2/ 1/ Democratic 27% 22% 24% 26% 25% % Republican 42% 50% 45% 41% 45% % Other 32% 28% 31% 33% 1 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 3,740 5,428 4,052 2,859 16,078 % Latino 8% 3% 6% 10% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 3°/ 3% 39/ 39/ % Filipino -Surnamed 2% 0% 2% 1% 1% Democratic 28% 22% 26% 27% 25% Republican 49% 55% 51% 49% 51% % Other 24% 23% 23% 24% 1 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 5,574 7,436 5,845 4,601 23,456 % Latino 101/ 5% 7% 11% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 3% 4% 3% Filipino -Surnamed 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 12,475 11,613 12,073 13,383 49,545 Age age0-19 279/o 259/o 25% 30% 27 age20-60 549/o 49% 51% 55% 53% age60plus 19% 26% 24% 15% 21% Immigration immigrants 19% 13% 15% 259/o 18% naturalized 69% 74% 1 61% 49% 61 Language spoken at home english 74% 86% 81% 64% 76% spanish 11% 69/o ° 8% 20% 11% asian-lang 10% 4% 6% 10% 7% other lang 4% 5% 5% 7% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 12% Very Well" 4% 9% 18% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 58% 34% 44% 51% 47% bachelor 259/o 369/o 30% 269/o 29% graduatedegree 12% 26% 18% 11% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 38% 35% 36% 46% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 61% 569/o 58% 64% 8% Commute on Public 1% Transit 1% 1% 2% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 10% 8% 14% 13% 11% income 25-50k 15% 11% 15% 17% 15% income 50-75k 15% 12% 9% 15% 13% income 75-200k 51% 44% 48% 47% 479A income 200k -plus 10% 25% 14% 7% 14% Housing Stats single family 81% 97% 81% 74% 83% multi -family 19% 3% 19% 26% 17% rented 29% 12% 27% 36% 26% owned 71% 88% 73% 64% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 55 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 127 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B 0 0 7d 0.. Rd'\ Suggested Election Years 2018: 1 & 3 2020: 2 & 4 �V � 67 J � 2 J I� J- --Twin Peaks Rd Poway Rd 1 c �'foway Rd 4 gc '� O Map layers — ® Plan 127 Water Area Streets River —� National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 56 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 127 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,897 11,521 12,432 11,961 47,811 Deviation from ideal -56 -432 479 8 911 %Deviation -0.47% -3.61% 4.01% 0.07% 7.62% Total Pop Hisp 20% 7% 13% 22% 16% % NH White 63% 83% 72% 59% 69% %NH Black 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 13% 8% 11% 14% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 8,963 8,710 9,438 8,752 35,863 % Hisp 17% 6% 11% 19% 13% % NH White 66% 85% 75% 63% 72% %NH Black 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %Asian -American 14% 7% 10% 14% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,646 8,139 8,968 8,485 34,238 % Hisp 16% 6% 12% 16% 12% / NH White 68/ 85/ 73/ 65/ 73/ %NH Black 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 14% 7% 10% 16% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 6,883 8,271 7,530 5,992 28,676 %Latino 11% 5% 8% 1390 9% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 4% 3°/ 5 % 4 % / Filipino -Surnamed 2/ 1/ 2/ 2/ 1/ Democratic 27% 22% 24% 26% 25% % Republican 42% 50% 45% 41% 45% % Other 32% 28% 31% 33% 1 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 3,740 5,211 4,268 2,859 16,078 % Latino 8% 3% 5% 10% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 3°/ 3% 39/ 39/ % Filipino -Surnamed 2% 0% 2% 1% 1% Democratic 28% 23% 26% 27% 25% % Republican 49% 55% 50% 49% 51% % Other 24% 22% 24% 24% 1 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 5,574 7,165 6,116 4,601 23,456 % Latino 101/ 4% 7% 11% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 3% 4% 3% Filipino -Surnamed 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 12,475 11,144 12,543 13,383 49,545 Age age0-19 279/o 259/o 25% 30% 27 age20-60 549/o 499/o 51% 55% 53% age60plus 19% 26% 24% 15% 21% Immigration immigrants 19% 13% 15% 259/o 18% naturalized 69% 73% 1 62% 49% 61 Language spoken at home english 74% 86% 81% 64% 76% spanish 11% 69/o ° 8% 20% 11% asian-lang 10% 4% 6% 10% 7% other lang 4% 5% 5% 7% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 12% Very Well" 4% 8% 18% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 58% 34% 43% 51% 47% bachelor 259/o 37% 30% 269/o 29% graduatedegree 12% 26% 18% 11% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 38% 34% 36% 46% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 61% 569/o 58% 64% 8% Commute on Public 1% Transit 1% 1% 2% 29 Household Income income 0-25k 10% 8% 14% 13% 11% income 25-50k 15% 11% 15% 17% 15% income 50-75k 15% 11% 10% 15% 13% income 75-200k 51% 44% 47% 47% 47% income 200k -plus 10% 25% 14% 7% 14% Housing Stats single family 81% 97% 82% 74% 83% multi -family 19% 3% 18% 26% 17% rented 29% 12% 26% 36% 26% owned 71% 88% 74% 64% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 57 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 128 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B4rnardo Rd 1 11 2 Rd" 41 4 Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 4 2020: 1 & 3 ;d Map layers ® Plan 128 Water Area Streets River National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 58 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 128 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 11,945 11,944 11,978 11,944 47,811 Deviation from ideal -8 -9 25 -9 34 %Deviation -0.07% -0.08% 0.21% -0.08% 0.28% Total Pop Hisp 9% 23% 16% 15% 16% % NH White 79% 57% 70% 70% 69% %NH Black 1% 2% 11/. 2% 29/o %Asian -American 9% 16% 10% 11% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 9,029 8,971 8,934 8,929 35,863 Hisp 8% 20% 13% 12% 13% % NH White 81% 60% 74°/ 74% 72% %NH Black 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% %Asian -American 8% 16% 10% 10% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,615 8,291 8,689 8,643 34,238 % Hisp 9% 18% 12% 11% 12% ° ° ° / NH White 81 / ° ° 61 / 72o/.76 ° ° / 73% % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl. 7% 18% 140/ 8% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 8,121 6,171 7,174 7,210 28,676 Latino 6% 13% 100/ 80/ 9o/ % Asian -Surnamed 4% 6 % 40/ 3 % 4°/ % Filipino -Surnamed li ino-Surnamed 1/ 2/ 1/ 2/ 1/ Democratic 23% 27% 24% 25% 25% % Republican 49% 41% 45% 43% 45% % Other 28% 32% 31% 31% 31% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) Total 5,009 1 3,193 3,868 4,009 1 16,078 % Latino 4% 9% 7% 6% 6% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 5°/ 2% 39/ 39/ o/ Filipino -Surnamed 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% Democratic 23% 28% 24% 27% 25% % Republican 54% 50% 51% 49% 51% % Other 22% 23% 1 25% 24% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 6,934 4,954 5,780 5,788 23,456 %Latino 5% 11% 8% 7% 8% % Asian -Surnamed 3% 5% 4% 3% 3% % Filipino -Surnamed 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 11,843 13,025 12,258 12,419 49,545 Age age0-19 269/o 279/o 28% 269/o 27 age20-60 499/o 559/o 54% 529/o 53% age60plus 25% 18% 18% 22% 21% Immigration immigrants 14% 24% 19% 169/o 18% naturalized 66% 64% 1 53% 60% 61 Language spoken at home english 84% 68% 74% 79% 76% spanish 89/o 15% 14% 8% 11% asian-lang 5% 12% 6% 6% 7% other lang 4% 4% 6% 7% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 6% Very Well" 16% 12% 10% 11% Education (among those age 25+) hs -grad 36% 56% 48% 47% 47% bachelor 359/o 24% 29% 29% 29% graduatedegree 24% 12% 14% 17% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 37% 40% 41% 37% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 599/o 629/o 60% 59% 8% Commute on Public 1% Transit 2% 1% 2% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 10% 11% 10% 14% 11% income 25-50k 14% 15% 16% 14% 15% income 50-75k 11% 17% 15% 9% 13% income 75-200k 43% 46% 49% 51% 47% income 200k -plus 22% 10% 11% 12% 14% Housing Stats single family 91% 75% 86% 81% 83% multi -family 9% 25% 14% 19% 17% rented 17% 34% 27% 28% 26% owned 83% 66% 73% 72% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -year data. 59 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Plan 129 City of Poway 2017 Districting Rancho B4rnardo Rd I L1� 3 Al tt C 1 'win Peaks Rd ii _ t 1, 40`x•' �' Suggested Election Years 2018: 2 & 4 2020: 1 & 3 or 2018: 2 & 3 2020: 1 & 4 Poway Rd Map layers ® Plan 129 Water Area Streets River -� National Demographics Corporation, August 10, 2017 60 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 City of Poway - Plan 129 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 12,028 12,051 11,830 11,902 47,811 Deviation from ideal 75 98 -123 -51 221 % Deviation 0.63% 0.82% -1.03% -0.43% 1.85% Total Pop % Hisp 7% 10% 23% 23% 16% % NH White 83% 74% 60% 58% 69% % NH Black 1% 2% 2% 3% 2% % Asian-American 8% 12% 12% 15% 12% Voting Age Pop Total 9,089 9,256 8,810 8,708 35,863 % Hisp 6% 9% 19% 20% 13% % NH White 85% 76% 64% 62% 72% % NH Black 1 % 2% 29/o 2% 2% % Asian-American 7% 11% 12% 14% 11% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 8,447 9,133 8,039 8,619 34,238 % Hisp 7% 9% 18% 16% 12% % NH White 85% 77% 66% 62% 73% % NH Black 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 6% 11% 13% 17% 12% Voter Registration (Nov 2014) Total 8,614 7,802 6,242 6,018 28,676 % Latino 5% 8% 13% 13% 9% % Asian-Sumamed 4% 4% 3% 5% 4% %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% % Democratic 22% 25% 26% 27% 25% % Republican 50% 44% 429/o 40% 45% % Other 28% 31% 32% 33% 31% Total 5,452 4,513 3,277 2,837 16,078 o/ Latino 3°% 6°% 90/ 90/ 6°% % Asian-Sumamed 3% 4% 39/o 3% 3% Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 2% 2% 1% 1% % Democratic 23% 27% 27% 27% 25% %Republican 55% 50% 49% 49% 51% % Other 22% 23% 24% 24% 23% Voter Turnout (Nov 2012) Total 7,475 6,572 4,803 4,603 23,456 % Latino 4% 7% 10% 11% 8% % Asian-Surnamed 3% 3% 3% 4% 3% %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 2% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop. Est. Total 11,661 12,373 12,133 13,378 49,545 Age age0-19 25% 25% 27% 30% 27% age20-60 49% 52% 54% 55% 53% age60plus 26% 23% 19% 15% 21% Immigration immigrants 12% 17% 18% 25% 18% naturalized 75% 71% 1 59% 50% 61% Language spoken at home english 86% 79% 77% 63% 76% o Spanish 6 /0 0 8 /0 0 11 /0 0 0 20 /0 11 /o asian-lang 4% 7% 9% 10% 7% other lang 5% 6% 4% 6% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than 4% Very Well" 9% 11% 18% 11% Education anion those age 25+) g hs-grad 34% 48% 53% 52% 47% bachelor 36% 28% 28% 26% 29% graduatedegree 27% 17% 12% 11% 17% Child in Household child-underl8 35% 35% 38% 46% 38% Work (percent of pop age 16+) employed 56% 58% 62% 64% 8% Commute on Public 1% Transit 2% 1% 2% 29% Household Income income 0-25k 8% 14% 10% 13% 11% income 25-50k 11% 13% 17% 18% 15% income 50-75k 11% 11% 14% 15% 13% income 75-200k 44% 49% 50% 46% 47% income 200k-plus 26% 14% 9% 7% 14% Housing Stats single family 97% 83% 80% 74% 83% multi-family 3% 17% 20% 26% 17% rented 12% 27% 29% 36% 26% owned 88% 73% 71% 64% 74% Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year data. 61 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 f�rrn2 NDC n.W.W rx—,Wni. corpoaean City of Poway 2017 Districting Comments received on each proposal received: August 10, 2017 Plan 100 This plan attempts to ensure at least two districts have a stake in the major natural features and recreation areas, like Lake Poway and the mountain, and in the commercial corridor along Scripps -Poway Parkway. In addition, three districts cross Poway Road and touch Poway Creek. Plan 101 This plan focuses on housing, with the densely populated areas of South Poway along Poway Road kept in Districts 3 and 4 and the larger, more rural properties in District 1. District 2 includes all the areas around the mountain in the north -central part of the city. Plan 102 This plan presents a reasonably compact map that keeps the Garden Road area with southern parts of Poway. It attempts to give each district a stake in different parts of Poway while still keeping major neighborhoods intact. Plan 1nA This is a vertically -aligned map that keeps all four districts touching Poway Road. While giving each district some diversity, it does put more of the rural properties in District 1, Old Poway and the high school in District 2, the mountains in District 3, and the densely populated areas in the southwest in District 4. Plan 104 District 1 is larger properties horse properties. District 2 3 4 are set as geographic areas of common housing. Plan 105 The ideal target population for each district is 11953. I used major roads as best as I could to divide up the territories and then tweaked them to have each district be as close to the target population as was possible. Plan 107 This districting plan follows all the guidelines population FVRA compact visible boundaries major streets and also keeps with the future growth of Poway based on current proposals. District 1 is the GVCA area. This group fits with a single- minded vision and very similar neighborhoods. District 2 is central Poway and has many of the city elements of Poway. Districts 3 and 4 are the rural areas of Poway and split the business park with district 3 being lower density and 4 having higher density. There are other close that can be used to divide the districts but in most cases these would divide neighbors and communities more than and provide very little difference in district. In this case the only potential downside is 3 council members in a single district. Based strictly on population this isnt abnormal however. About 64% of Poway lives south of Twin Peaks road leaving roughly 17k people north of it or just slightly over 1.5 districts. Plan 108 This districting plan follows all the guidelines population FVRA compact visible boundaries ie. major streets and keeps with the future growth of Poway based on current proposals. It is like the other map I submitted but directly addresses the downside outlined in that map. To be specific this puts the council in 2 distinguished districts by the current council. To directly address the issue of current council being in a position where they cannot run in the election for their district it fits very nicely to have the next two council in one district 2 and the remaining in district 1. District 1 is the GVCA area. This group fits with a single-minded vision and very similar neighborhoods. District 2 is central Poway and has many of the city elements of Poway. Districts 3 and 4 are the rural areas of Poway and split the business park with district 3 being lower density and 4 having higher density. About 64 percent of Poway lives south of Twin Peaks road leaving roughly 17k people north of it or just slightly over 1.5 districts. 62 of 66 ATTACHMENT C August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 f�rrn2 NDC ndeawM—W.&-C-W. , City of Poway 2017 Districting August 10, 2017 Plan 110 This plan divides Poway into ideological groups based primarily on their geography and economic situation. In general land and Prop FF to the hills with smaller scale industry and commerce to the valleys. Districts are contiguous and traditional. Plan 111 These lines are drawn and divided in the most fair and accurate for the people of Poway Plan 113 Creates two north and two south districts while keeping similar home sizes together. Plan 114 Boundaries are primarily main roads. Creates one north one central one south and one large district which captures the remainder of the population Plan 115 What shouldn t happen... Plan 116 The stripes of Poway. Plan 117 Terrible plans for Poway Plan 118 A less complex means to minimize inequality across the city. Geography economics geology race all mimic what we have in Poway today. When any district resident speaks before the council they will represent a group that is found in all of the districts and will therefore have ear of each of the councilors and thus wield the most power possible within a district setting Plan 119 Creates two north and two south districts Plan 120 This plan uses zoning as the chief criteria and transportation corridors as a secondary criteria . District 4 is rural residential district 3 is single family homes and districts 1 &2 are a mix of single family condo and apartment. There are a few spots in the northern part of district 3 that really belong in district 4 but the software did not allow a very large area to be subdivided. There is one small area north of twin Peaks and Espola that also belongs in district 4 Plan 121 Circles so council is still responsible all around Poway. Plan 122 Gerrymandering can cut both ways. 63 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 f�rrn2 NDC ndeawM—W.&-C-W. , City of Poway 2017 Districting August 10, 2017 Plan 123 I followed all of the guidelines when drawing these districts. I turned to the Community Interest guideline when establishing the North and South maps. Both of these two districts have very unique community interests. The North District with its low density and large lots and the GVCA and only a few business s and then we have the South District with high density and mostly small lots many businesses and the issues that follow with our businesses traffic noise lights etc. With the West and East Districts I drew the boundaries from the northern part of the City all the way down to the southern part of the city and then over to Community Road. Also with this map each district includes schools parks and affordable housing and or land that was purchased for affordable housing. And each have businesses within their boundaries. Finally three districts W S E touch Poway Rd. That s very important because of the future development proposed for Poway Rd. Plan 124 This plan sets the city up to easily transition Incumbents to compete for their seats in their assigned districts as well as their election year. It also sets the city up for 2 new council members to learn from veteran members. This is what s best for Poway as it lays to rest the idea Gerrymandering may be in play for the incumbents to secure their seats allows for new representation on council and outlines the required number of districts in a manner that makes sense. Plan 125 This map follows the criteria adopted by the city council Plan 126 Follows city council criteria Plan 127 Respects population requirements communities of interest it is compact districts are contiguous etc etc Plan 128 Gerrymandered plan to respect voter s wishes. Plan 129 I think this map makes sense because the districts are based on land uses, larger lots less density areas are grouped into one district, the 2nd and 3rd districts are more populated around Poway and Pomerado Rds. Last, the 4th district is clustered in the southern sections of the city. 64 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 RESOLUTION NO. 17-055 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING LINE DRAWING CRITERIA FOR ESTABLISHING COUNCIL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Poway ("City") was elected under an .,at large" election system whereby Councilmembers were elected by voters of the entire City; WHEREAS, the City Council is considering a change to the "by district" elections whereby each Councilmember must reside within the designated district boundary and is elected only by voters of that district; WHEREAS, the Federal Voting Rights Act (42 U.S.C. Section 1973) prohibits the use of any voting qualification, or prerequisite to voting, or standard practice or procedure in a manner which results in a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color; WHEREAS, federal law and the equal protection clause require that each district be equal in population to ensure compliance with the "one person, one vote" rule; however, deviations approximating five to ten percent may pass muster under the equal protection clause where required to meet an official criteria; and WHEREAS, the City Council has instructed its demographer and city staff to develop draft maps that fully comply with legal requirements and intends to provide official criteria for any needed deviations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Poway as follows: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Poway does hereby adopt the following criteria to guide the establishment of districts for council elections (each, a "Council District"): 1. Each Council District shall contain a nearly equal number of inhabitants; 2. Council District borders shall be drawn in a manner that complies with the Federal Voting Rights Act; 3. Council Districts shall consist of contiguous territory in as compact form as possible; 4. Council Districts shall respect communities of interest as much as possible; 65 of 66 ATTACHMENT D August 18, 2017, Item #2.1 Resolution No. 17-055 Page 2 5. Council District borders shall follow visible natural and man-made geographical and topographical features as much as possible; and 6. If the Council is so inclined, Council District borders may respect the previous choices of voters by avoiding the creation of head-to-head contests between Councilmembers previously elected by the voters, insofar as this does not conflict with Federal or State Law. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Poway, California, at a regular meeting this 1st day of August 2017. Steve Vaus, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Id, CM , City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) I, Nancy Neufeld, City Clerk of the City of Poway, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 17-055 was duly adopted by the City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on the 1st day of August 2017, and that it was so adopted by the following vote: AYES: CUNNINGHAM, GROSCH, MULLIN, LEONARD, VAUS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE DISQUALIFIED: NONE Nincy eufel MC, City Clerk City of Poway 66 of 66 August 18, 2017, Item #2.1