Item 2E - Land Use and Zoning Amendment Request to Draft Comprehensive Plan - Gary D'Elena •
AGENDA REPOR • `•war
CITY OF POWAY
fc. 'ry�E.r
�fA GLV
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FRC14: James L. Bowersox, City Man.1Yvz
•
INITIATE7) BY: Barry K. Hogan, Director of Planning Services
DATE: July 5, 1983
SUBJECT: Land Use and Zoning Amendment Request to Draft
Comprehensive Plan
APPLICANT: Gary D'Elena
LOCATION: See Map on Reverse Page
APN: 823-260-34
NET PARCEL SIZE: .15 Acre
ABSTRACT
CURRENT LAND USE PLAN: 6: Residential 7.3 W/Net AC
CURRENT ZONIIC PLAN: RS-7
REQUESTED LAND USE PLAN: 13: Commercial General
REQUESTED ZONINU PLAN: CC
RECC{MENDED LAND USE PLAN: 7: Residential Single Family 4-7 W/Net AC .
RECCWIENDED ZONINU PLAN: RS-7
ANALYSIS
The subject site is part of a single family subdivision. As part of the •
development process the developer should have installed noise attenuating
measures along the Poway Road frontages. If the property owner installs
such the noise will be mitigated to an acceptable level. The adjacent
westerly property is suggested to be multiple family and upon development
could remedy the current problem of compatibility. Sufficient mitigation
measures are present in the new development code to protect adjacent
single family homes.
RECOMMENDATION
Leave as Residential Family 5 and RS-7 zoning.
\
ACTION: 7-5-83 Took public testimony.
7-19-83 Tentative vote to adopt staff recommendation to designate this
property RS-7 as delineated
in the Draft Plan.
Jo Seibert,, Deputy Clerk
I
l of 4 .
JUL 5 1983 ITEM 2 E (8)
ae . hidasim# c
x `�W7.
0 ® . . ®. . .®. . ® ®•
.»a itt 1 Wt 1•t.,aiyol � �+ x443 IL pr'#:
•
13208 Ann-O-Reno
Poway, California 92064
October 14, 1982
Stephen G. McCutchan
John E. Bridges
City of Poway
13202 Poway Road
Poway, California 92064
Dear Sirs:
In response to our recent conversation regarding the future sale
of property located at 13208 Ann-O-Reno, I have researched the
market for current properties for sale in my area. I feel
( that I must recommend a request for re-zone from RS7 to C-36, •
as the property is surrounded by other parcels which are already •
C-36, some of which were rezoned.
This has resulted in a non-conforming residential area along
Poway Road plus an added problem of traffic noise as many new
businesses have recently opened along Poway Road.
The surrounding commercial parcels have had a negative effect
on my property value as a residential resale.
Sin erely /J
yDC r72lena
cm
• R �• r E •
0C;i i 12;2 •
3 of 4 •
• JUL 5 1983 ITEM 2 E (g)
ilk _? no_
® 22 12 30 ._
23 a 'T 11 ?I
. MI ...
10 a
\ .
25 '_: too� to
A M1 -
J {A`
f 585 IJ'_;'E , tG.;_ In/}�J ' I
s N s 'Jar II�v v
=i 26 26 2t �EgN.O.R�ND �ti
4 ROAD oc h
cm
N in 109 66
27 T1 iD
J 03P
O 6:s)teri
0 •
1?C ]G
r
28 28 nalle
Z • oEVEL' 1
m SEOUL
2Q . . 5 O ,�• - c.1$
2 V Fn
%II'
”: 10 30 O ,, I I ` I
P O
:I _
I
;I 32 32
.r I
o 1 �y'I
6 3 ..�
0 1 L
ar O, . .. .
Go
P :G I
v
569'14'47 E ^�
puw Ay � 0 a
osmonsmana ma® � ®
Cilairall ,-
K-
..
4 of 4
— , , , I ; FEECTUL 5 1983 ITEM 2 E Cid)