Item 24A - PDC Analysis 86-22 for A Senior Housing Project - Daniel M. Waller1 ITEM
q
2 of
tJ,
„.
Agenda. -Report
June 26,
1986
Page 2
HISTORY:
On October 2.3, 1984, the Council adopted an amendment
to the Zoning Development Code: changing the develop-
ment standards for senior housing projects (Ordinance
No. 144). Subsequent to this change, the Council
requested Staff evaluate potential sites for senior
housing projects. This site was excluded from con-
sideration because it did not meet the 2 acre minimum
site requirement. Staff had considered the site as
an excellent location for a senior project, because
-
it was close to the senior center and shopping cen-
entees.
ters._
ZONING:
This project would be an in -fill project between two
multi -unit projects.. The project would need to>
comply with the residential senior citizen develop-
ment. standards. The density restrictions of the: RC
f
zone would limit the number of units to 15 compared
to 25 units per acre under the RA zone designation..
is SUMMARYt
The applicant is requesting the Council increase: the
density and allowable site coverage of the develop
ment standards for this senior housing project` The
x4.
proposed 42; 2'39 square foot, two-story building,
would exceed. the 50 percent lot coverage: restriction
of the standards. Staff's opinion is that the site
is a good location for a senior housing project, and
that the proposed use would be compatible with adja-
cent multi -unit project. However, the requested
increase in density and building size would limit the
site's ability to provide sufficient amemities and
landscaping.
JLB:RWT:SEC:pn
Attachments:
1-•
Applicant's Letter
2.:
Apreemen.t of Understanding
3.
Surrounding Zoning
3 of 6
4i
GPAH� MORTGAGE COMPANY
• INVESTMENT'S
LLE:)
sa4rcYsLLs ns Le rrsTs
L� JOLLA CALWORNM
454.1899
May 2, 1956
r;
z.
Reba W. Touw,, Director of Planning Services
r
CITY OF PONAY
13202 Civic Center Drive
Poway, California 920644
RE.- Proposed elderly Housing a 42,239 SgFt. parcel on Rowron''!
Road, south of RemlapWa y,; Cit -7 of Poway.
Dear leis. Tauw
Please schedule a conference for our proposed project at
your June 2nd. meeting.
`v'Q propose to hui.ld as `many apartments for the elderly on
this parcel as you will permit. It is our hope that you will
large enough project to
consider higher density to permit us a
be able to afford:
T A r'esid'ent manager, ;so needed: by the elderly-
Y.
r -A usable pool and recreation area for gathering,'
.. A security system, with a person to respond
tto'n-site«,
We are excited to have the opportunity of building
a
housing for the elderly across the street from Poway Valley
Seniors Center..
tie look Eoward to working with you to mace this flr000sal
an apartment project that can he a viable part of your community.;
S` ce elv A
Daniel 4.Valla,for RF'n, Ltd.
Agreement of Understanding
Location MapJ
IT
4
s
4 of 6
JUN _17 1988: i E PA
���.-...v-�.».,.---"-...-_�.....--._...-..-,.-=....Y�._.._..-..._.____...,.n,,,..;..-n�.��-.-... r_.,.-.,-.:�--.�.�-.-,dff......��.....�......��-�:,,- _ - - . _>>-r-••e�
.. c- ..':moi
PISREEMENT OF UNDERSTAND=
DING
City Council for the City of Poway, hereinafter referred to as "City" and
fAM7tT 4. WALLA , for RFD, Ltd. , hereinafter referred to as "Proponent"
a C iifprLZg I' ractne shin to he f.med
enter into: this Agfnen o s ng upon the fo owing facts:
Proponent owns or has an equitable interest in land described by tax
assessor's parcel numbers; 317-474-0I
Pro pent desires to developthisproperty in accordance with the will of the
City and without the expense of a protracted development.
City is concerned that Proponent will create development plans unsatisfac-
tory to City and consume time and effort of City employees needlessly on
unsatisfactory development plans unless City assists in directing Proponent.
Based upon the above-mentioned facts, City will -grant Proponent a hearing
prior to filing any application for development upon the following understand-
ing:
. City will render no decision with regards to any develognent proposal
or part thereof.
. City will receive no evidence,
particular development.plan.
City will snake no representations that will obligate the City to render
a_decision: in favor of or against any development, proposal or part
thereof Proponent may subsequently submit.
If any develoanent proposal is subsequently submitted, Proponent will
proceed at its sole and exclusive risk with the understanding that City
has made no representations upon which Proponent may rely.
DANIEL 4, WALLA, for RrT), Ltd.
a California Limited Partnership
to he formed
specific in nature, in support of a
•
Dated:
5 of 6
`Lav 1_ TORE
Proponent:
Signature
Address: 9053 Calle de la Plata
La Jolla, California 07037
Phone: (610) 454-1999
JUN 1.7 1985 1TEM :4!