Item 2 - PDC 86-33 Charles E. Herold� GENDAREPORT'
`
'CITY OF POWAY
M
TO
Honorable Mayor and Membersof the City Council
FROM:James.
L. Bowersox.r City Manager
INITIATED BY:
Reba W., Touw, Director of Plannn Services'
Kris A. Hughs , Assistant Planner.
DATE:
August 19f 1986
SUBJECT:
Predevelopment Conference Analysis (.PDC: 86-33) for .
Charles E.. Herold, APAlicant
ABSTRACT
e
REQUEST:
Consideration of a request fora proposed
Conditional Use Permit to allow the use: of an
existing structure located in the MS zone: as a
contractor's office and storage -yard.
LOCATION:
14037 Poway Road
i
GROSS ACREAGE':
13,680 square feet t 3 acre}
SURROUNDING
ZONINGAND
LAND USES:
Properties to the east and west of'the site are
zoned MS and are: developed with commercial uses..`
The lot which is adjacent to the south is zoned;
RS -7 and developed with a one-story sngle.-
family dwelling.
HISTORY:
The subject structure is a historic building+
t
which is currently occupied by a real estate
office: and an antique furniture business.. The
applicant proposes to utilize the existing-
xistingbuilding
buildingas: a.general-contractor'soffice and to
usetheunpaved rear yard as a.storage area for
lumber and parking area for one truck used in:
the business. He plans to use the building f:ar .
aper -10 d of three: to four years.
9-4-860 '11h_ Kr
._
TIS �N; C on c
�1G utred
to hold* on
Marjo ie K. Wahlsten
Cit ` lerk
SEP 4 1986 ITEM 2
�- ....___..._._:_.�_�.._...-....:•.-_. ._.:— a..—.—._..—u.-...,.+-....«...+.a-.w.r...-•tu-_�.w•.�--rn.:ss.ssr:!.++.+v�Rl�.»�,_
AUG 1. 1986 IT EI M 2 z
._.- _>3c_,>s.., .. _ .�.. _ -- _ 3 -_. _., asp. u a.—....3� 1�:.
Iv
Agenda Report
August 19, 19=86
Page 2:
The only site. improvement proposed is the,
construction of a six: foot high. solid wood fence=
along the southern property line. The remainder a
of the rear yard is already fenced.. `
The property development standards: of the: MS
zone would require the following site improve -
menta:
1. Construction of an eight foot high: masonry
wall enclosingthe outdoor storage area. A.
five foot wide raised landscape planter
would be required adjacent to the wall,
along the southern property line, where. the:
site: adjoins residential zoning.
2.: installation of landscaping in the. required
20 foot: setback area along Poway,Road and.
Welton Lane.
3.Five off=a rest parking space., J
�LB:.RWT:RAH: is
Attachments:
1r zoning Map
- • Site ..'Plan
3
3. Agreement
of Understanding
SEP 4 igen tT E M' .
eAUG
19 1�AT84 LO
ITEM . PDC 5(0-33
TITLE . Z Ot\( ►
SCALE :, NONE ATTACHMENT C
60
tubo DRFAICC To 73 F-26c.T&Z
7' *FiOA L�
OL
3i
Q �
1
f
LX
G
%I
A TZCA
1
is
�_PAV1 N
.
-+ �.
'. ♦ n
J
All
tsM
�
-
to Pt.
.`L.e t +• V �_
•.i"e i Tem:. DC_ �✓ 6Si— -�
i.l"i'•
o�
A /� D
• ad ,11fR,o
i
DGWALK
i
ST966
SEP 4 198fi
t
tll: 14 )RRA MP M %s
AGREEMENrOF UMEt s IDING
City Council for the City of Poway, hereinafter referred to as `'City' and.
AieEgzo blee..eL6 0157. Loc.. , hereinafter referred to as. "Proponent"
enter into this Agreement: of Understanding based upon the following facts:
Proponent owns or has an equitable interest in land described by tax
assessor's parcel. number E s 3 3z._3 -:-Z7
0—��
Proponent desires to develop this property in accordance with the will of the
City and without the expense of a protracted development.
City is concerned that Proponent will create development plans unsatisfac-
tory to City and consume tine and effort of City employees needlessly on
unsatisfactory development plans unless City assists in directing Proponent.-
Based upon the above-mentioned facts, City will grant Proponent a hearing
prior to filing any application for development- upon the following understand-
ing:
City will render no decision with regards to any development proposal
or part thereof.
s.. City will receive no evidence:, specific in nature, in support of a
particular develogent plan.
. City will make no representations that will _obligate the City to render
a decision in favor of or against any development proposalor part
thereof Proponent may" subsequently sulcnit. _
• If any developrre.nt proposal is subsequently submitted, Proponent will
proceed at its sole and: exclusive risk with the understanding that City
has made: no representations upon which. Proponent may rely.
Dated:
Proponent:
Signature
•
IT -Em: p D c 867-33
TITLE 51 TE PLAN
SEP 4 198Wt" t EN T:
Attt 19 1986 ITEM •
is
AGENDA REPORT OF POS p
t�
_ E
CITY OF POAY
j.
4-n—a too
!N THE G
'Os Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FPM: Janes L. Bvwersox, City Managet$lb
NtTIATED BY Alan D. Archibald, Director of Public Services
DAI e, September 4, 1985
SUBJECT Determining the Future width of Garden Road
BACKGROUND
When the General Plan was adopted. in 1983, Garden. Road wasdesignated as, a
future four Lane, secondary arterial road with a right-of-way width of 84 feet:
and a curb -to -curb width of 54 feet. Since Garden Road is presently a. two lane
roadway with varying widths from. 28 feet to 54 feet, the General Plan designated
it as a bine route street without. striped: bike lanes. The General Pian also
cates that because "an school, a park, and multi family residents
are located on the street,` bike lanes should be installed along Garden Road.
when it is widened to four lanes.
Orden Road presently carries approximately 12,000 cars per day. In order to
determine future traffic, volumes, SANDAL prepared. a horizon year computer
analysis with the cities: circulation. element roads in place. SANDAL estimates
that the future traffic volumes will. exceed 22,000 cars per day between. Pty
Road. and Neddick Avenue: and reduce to 15,000 cars per day between Neddick -and
Route 125.1 -
n order to (1) handle the future traffic voluri es rn (2) provide left -tum access
to the many side: streets and driveways; and (3) provide striped bike lanes,
_
Garden Road must be widened. to 74 feet curb -to -curb r with. a right-�of-mey width
of 90 feet. Theexi sting right -of -sway varies from 40 feet to 102: feet, with. an
average right -of pray width of 72 feet. Additional right-of�ray must, thereforer
be acquired to construct a four lane: roadway.
I
ACTION:
R
SEP 4 1986 ITEM 3
Future Width of Garden Road
Septeuber 4, 1986
Page - 2
FINDINGS
In order to handle the traffic projected by SANDAL, GardenRoad should retrain
designated as a four -lane roadway in the General Plan,. but the curb -to -curb
width andright-of-way should be _increased. from 641/80' to 74'/90' to accom-
modate
cco nmodate both bike lanes.. and a left -turn lane. However, the capacity of Garden
Roadwill determine it's desirability as a through route between. Sycamore.
Canyon Road (SR 125) and Poway Road. If the road remains two -lanes, then
motorists will be more likely to use either Poway Road or the South Poway
Parkway for through east/west traffic.
RECCMMIDATICtg
Itis recommended that the City Council direct staff to initiate an amendment to
the General Plan to designate Garden Road as a future two. --ane road east of
Neddick and four -lanes for : that area 'west. of Neddick the majority of whaich is
generally zoned either CN or MS, and currently "Constructerr to that standard..
JLB:ADA pwial_
cr
SEP 4
1986 IT t