Item 3 - PDC for Texaco USAOf
JAN J 1986 ITEM
3
Agenda Report
January 91 1986
Page 2:
,
A. The proposed nonconforming use will not have
a greater adverse impact on the surrounding area than
the existing or former nonconforming use.
B. The proposed nonconforming use shall be a
use that would be permitted to continue in the zone
in which it would be located as prescribed in Section
17..44.,090. (Ord. 11.3 Sl(Exh. A 9.6)g, 1983)
Section 17.10.140
C. In the CC zone, new construction and
reconstruction or, rehabilitation of existing
L
buildings and/or sites shall be in accordance with
the following design criteria:
1.. Development Plan.. A development plan
shall be prepared for: the entire site under con-
sideration regardless of whether development is: con-
templated in the near future. The purpose of the
development plan is to show conceptually where
buildings might be located _and where and how parking
and on-site and off-site; circulation will function.
2. Site Development Standards. The site
development standards shallbes consistent with the
requirements of the CCzone as indicated in both.
Section. 17..10.130 and this section.. The, standards;
shall. be reminiscent- and reflective of the early
farming and rural country character of the: City Plan.
The siteplan should seek to use. imaginative,
creative, and stimulating architectural design with
special consideration given to the provision of the
following items:
a. Low intensity lighting;
b:.; Pedestrian comfort stations,
c. Generous landscaping;
d. Decorative paved walkways;
e. Basic design: theme,
f . Separation of pedestrian and. vehicular-
f.f
-way;. and
g Architecturally -integrated ground-
mounted equipment such. as trash recep-
tacles and transformers.
GENERAL PLAN
x GUIDELINES':
Objective 33
Focal points, or high activity areas:, should be.
enhanced. through community design features to
encourage: viable commercial,areas.
2 of 7
JAN 1986 tT E M
1
Agenda Report
January 9, 1986
Page 3.>
Police 33.aa The following areas are designated as
t
focal points because of current or future high
activity:
- The western entry along Poway Road at Oak Knoll
Road;:
The intersection of Poway Road and Pomerado Road;.
The intersection.of Twin Peaks Road and Pomerado
_
Road;
- The intersection of Poway Road and Community Road,
- The intersection.of Poway Road. and Midland Road; and
The eastern entrance to the Poway Road business
area at Garden. Road excluding Garden. Road. itself.
Folie 33.b Design review of development applira-
tions at focal points shall strive to encourage the
best representations. of Poway's rural character.
Polis 36.a Sign height and size should be consistent
with the low profile nature and scale of buildings
that are characteristic of Poway' s rural. character.
Policy 36.c Signage should be integrated. into the
overall site, and architectural design process to
provide signs that are consistent with: architectural
style, color, material, and landscaping themes.
Policy 37.c Access points to adjoining lots should
be shared wherever feasible.
Folicr�41.b The site plans shall illustrate com-
patblity with the planning of adjoig parcels arcels in
planning
the areas of building configuration, building design:,:
landscaping materials, parking configuration, and
access.
`_y__rs used in commercial construction
should be�primarily earth tonesi with complementary
accents "in muted shades of reds, blues, greens11
grays, and yellows.
Policy 50.b A totally monocromatic appearance should
be avoided through the: use of complementary colors.
Policy 50.c Materials used in commercial. construc-
tion shall have textured surfaces such, as rough -sawn`
woods, split -face block, stucco, and facade brick.
it
3 of 7 JAN: 9 198E; IT E lUC
r _
f
E
Agenda Report
January 9, 1986
Page 4
Policy 50.d Excessive use of smooth surface
materials such as metal, plastic, and glass should be
discouraged or off set by overhangs or architectural
projections,.
Policy 45.a Landscaping materials used should
complement the dominant structure in height, size,
and location.
Policy 45.b Front.setback areas shall be landscaped
with a combination of trees, shrubs, and groundcovers
that help to soften the: appearance of on-site struc-
tures and define pedestrian paths. and the site area.
Policy 45.c, Landscaping in parking areas- shall
include one 15 gallon size tree per. every three
parking spaces evenly distributed throughoutthe:
parking area,
GENERPL
COMMENTS: Texaco remode ed this service station in. 1983 to
comply with: the company�s new station design.. The
level of remodeling was minor and did not require:
~;
Development Review-.. As part. of the. remodeling prof-
p
�
ectr a. convenience store area was incorporated into
this design. Texaco now requests that they be; per-
mitted to open the: convenience store phase of the
service station. Zoning Ordinance, Amendment 85-01,
adopted on April 1,, 1985,. prohibits convenience
stores in the Community Commercial zone; however, the
Code doesallow a change from one nonconforming use
to another nonconforming use through the use: permit
process where findings as: specified. in Section
17.44.070 can be made:.
JLB:JEB:JHL: s
Attachments.::
1. Applicant's Request. Letter
2. Agreement of Understanding,-
nderstanding3.
3.Site Plan _
4 of 7 —.._ � -� 98
JAN ITEM 3
ED FIEDLER AND ASSOCIATES
November 25, 1985
City of Poway
P. 0. Box 789
Poway,. ' CA 92064
Attn: Mr. Lyon
Assistant Planner
2322 WEST -THIRD STREET
LOS ANGELES.CALIFORNIA 90057-1906
PHONE: 213-381-789.1
AM -3704
RE. Texaco Service Station
13341 Poway Road
Poway, CA
Dear. Mr.. Lyon,
Per our telephone conversation of 11/25/85,please schedule a
pre -development conference for the prop,osed modification, of
the above referenced facility.
Thank -o :t,
Armando Morales
AM/vin
5 of . 7
ENG. LIC. #ME -230
GEN. CON;: LIC. #B1.•201566
ARIZ.. LtC # 1792 •
JAN 9 1986 ITEM
City Council for the City of Poway, hereinafter referred to as "Cityn and
,hereinafter referredto as "Proponent"'
enter into this Agreement of Understanding based upon the following facts:
Proponentowns or has an equitable interest in land described by tax
assessor's: parcel numbers) X1"7 •
Proponent desires to develop this property in accordance with the will of the
City and without the expense of a protracted development.
City is concerned that Proponent will create development plans unsatisfac-
tory to City and consume tie and effort of City Employees needlessly on
unsatisfactory development: plans unless City assists in directing Proponent.
Based upon the above-icentioned facts, City will grant. Proponent a hearing
prior to filing any application for development upon the following understand -
•
City will render no decision with regards to any developient proposal
or part thereof.
City will receive no evidence, specific in nature, in support of a
particular developaent plan.
City will crake no representations that will obligate the City to render
a decision in favor of or against any development proposal, or part
thereof Proponent may subsequently submit.
If any development proposal is subsequently submitted, Proponent will
proceed at its sole and exclusive risk with the understanding that City
has made no representations upon which. Proponent nay rely.
JAN 91986
0.66 AC.
0•, .. _i 5e
51
so.+ ..- ! 1 11 till ACo u
.22 9.75 h:, _ 2.29. T5` `;
- . 9:1-o— — POWrAY f. -.,
IP
tvt' Si'.
.. v.a .a.Tv'I .1v tri? ya.1,k "r,'", s¢ /o,
013'
6:61 AC.
HALEY S TRAILER RANCH
SEE SHEET 2
MARKETING OPERATIONS
ENGINEERING' ��,