Item 7 - Minutes of RDA Meeting January 21, 1986FES4 198- tTEM 7
185
.i��-�--i-•-v..�,-., ..- .-.-.���.:,:�.:� .�, - �.. , --�_ _ n„F�- --.-- _ - _ �:� _ _ .. _ ._._w�_� _ ,u .- _ �..� .�» � �:.�,,.- . : ;. _ate--��� ,...-<... =
Page 2 - CITy OF POWAY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - January 21, 1986
ITEM 12
COOPERATION* AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
POiMERADO SOUNDMM PROJECT
This item was pulled from the Consent Calendar by Director Shepardson.
Staff report by Executive Director Bowersox. He stated this project includes the
construction of a noise attenuation wall, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street
lights, and landscaping along the east side of Pomerado Road. from. Robison.
a
enc
Boulevard to Glenoak Road. In order for the Redevelo g t Agency, to utilize
funds for public improvements, a resolution determining that the improvements
are of benefit to: the project. area must be adopted. The cooperation and reim-
bursement agreement between the. Agency and the: City provides, the mechanism fon
7
the Agency to participate in this project.
}
Motion by Director Emery, seconded by Director Shepardson, to adopt Resolution
No. R-86-04 entitled, '`A Resolution of the Poway Redevelopment Agency
Determining Certain Public Improvements to be of Benefit. to the Paguay
Redevelopment Project; Authorizing the Payment by the Redevelopment. Agency to
the City of Poway of the Value of the Installation and Construction of Such:
Public Improvements; and Approving and Authorizing the Execution of a
Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement Therefore Between the City and the.
Agency." Motion carried unanimously.
E7CUTIVE DIRECTOR ITEMS
14. Off Docket Item - Exclusive Negotiation Agreement - Poway CC= CenterLtd.
Approval of this. agreement. would allow Poway Creek Centerr Ltd, to work
with the Agency for 60 days in order to put together an auto dealership:
on the former site of the proposed. Poway Creek Center on, Poway Road.
Recommendation: is to approve: the agreement and authorize the Executive
Director, to execute it.
Following discussion regarding the purpose of the agreement. and its
benefits to the, applicant and the, Agency, the Directors concurred that
no purpose can be served by tying up the property for, an additional. 60
days:. Even. without anexclusive negotiation agreement, the applicant
is able to put together an. application. for a use on the: property.
Motion. by Director Tarzy, seconded by Director Oravec•, to oppose staff
L recommendation and deny the exclusive negotiation agreement with Poway
Creek: Center, Ltd. Motion carried unanimously.
AWOURNMENY
Upon motion by Director Shepardson seconded by Director Oravec, Chairman Kruse
ordered the meeting adjourned. The time of adjournment was 8:35 P.M.
Marjorie',t& Wahlsten, Secretary
Poway Redevelopment Agency
18G M
FEB 4 19806; IT E 7