Item 12 - Resolution of Denial for MDR 85-59AGENDA ]REPORT
0'OF: PQiiiA
�Y niE GOVT
TO: Honorable: Mayor and: Members of the City Council
FROM':: 'James L. Bowersox,t City Ma
INITIATED BY: John E:,: Bridgest Acting Director of Planning Services
DATE February 250, 1986
SUBJECT: Resolution of Denial for Minor Development
Review, 85-59
BACKGROUND.
On February 11., 1586, the: City Council heard Minor Development
Ste'
Review 8.5:-5:9.' requesting the installation of a dishantenna,. ten
feet six. inches- in height and ten feet in diameter, for the property
located at 136'4T Orchard Gate Road., After reviewing, the submitted
j
materials., and; listening to. concerns.... expressed by the neighborhood
regarding the adequaeyF of the: proposed screening, -the Council
denied the minor development review request.
RECOMMENDATIO'
It is recommended that the. City Council adopt the attached resole--
tion for the denial of Minor Development. Review 85-59'
JLB :iJEB° s.SEC a i s
x
Attachment: r
1„ Proposed Resolution:
t
z
`i
3
M
4 That the. proposed, development does not encourage the
orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and pro.-
perty within the City in that the antenna proposed: is a
large, unaesthetic structure which, as a resultofc the
topography of the site and the location of buildings on
the site and neighboring sites, cannot be screened from.
adjacent and neighboring properties: to the south
2 of 3 FEB 2 5 1986 IT E M 1c
RESOLUTION NO. P-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA
DENYING MINOR DEVELOPMENTREVIEW 85-59
ASSESSOR"S; PARCEL NUMBER 2.75-731-15
4
WHEREAS, Minor. Development Review 85.-591 submitted by Ruppert
feet six.
and. Wanda Jones, applicant, requests a dish. antenna, ten:
in diameter for the- property located
inches in height and ten, feet
at 13647 Orchard. Gate Road, in the RR -C. (Rural Residential C') zone,
and
WHEREAS, Section 1T.3T.02.OF provides that such an antenna shall
not be approved unless the antenna can be screened from view of
adjacent. properties.; and
WHEREAS, on February 11, 1986, the City Council ty- .:held;
L a hearing on. the above -referenced item;
WH on F ruar� 25 1,1 86 , th ,.City Counci -, , held a
sine t h ':ng on the :above -referenced idem.
f OW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby resolve as
follows:.
_
Section is Findings:.
-`'
1.. That the. proposed. development- is in conformance with the
�re
Poway General Plan.
2: That the proposed development will have an adverse aesthe-
tic, health, safety, or architecturally related
impact upon. adjoining properties in, thatr as a. result of
the site and
topography and the. looat:on of buildings on
neighboring sites, the: dish antenna cannot be screened.
from adjacent and neighboring properties to the south.
3. That. the proposed development is not in compliance with
the Zoning Ordinance in that the dish antenna cannot be
screened from adjacent and neighboring properties to the
south..
4 That the. proposed, development does not encourage the
orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and pro.-
perty within the City in that the antenna proposed: is a
large, unaesthetic structure which, as a resultofc the
topography of the site and the location of buildings on
the site and neighboring sites, cannot be screened from.
adjacent and neighboring properties: to the south
2 of 3 FEB 2 5 1986 IT E M 1c
3 of 3
Resolution. No. P
Page 2
Section 2`: City Council Decision.•
The City Council hereby denies Minor Development Review 85-59.
APPROVED. and. ADOPTED by, the City Council of the City of Poway,
State of California, this 25th day of February, 1986.
Carl R. Kru se , Mayor
ATTEST:
Marjorie K. Wahlsten, City Clerk
FEB 2 1986 ITEM 12