Off Docket - Approval of Recommended Fare Subsidy Structure for Poway Airport ServiceABSTRACT'
On.February 2:5,. 198:6 bids:for airport transit service were opened..
Attached is a recommended fare: subsidy structure that requires
City Council concurrence prior to the County Board of Supervisors
executing a contract with the operator.
BACKGROUND
In.Dec;ember 1984 airport transit service: between Poway and Lindbergh
Field was.initiated.to provide service to the residents of Poway.
{' The: two operators awarded. contracts; were Airport Stage Lines=. and
Capital./Fleetwood Arporter.:
Airport Stage Lines- discontinued service in October 19185 without
prior notice and Capitol/Fleetwood Airporter discontinued service
in January 1:986 with, just three days notice.
On February 3, 1986 they County of San -Diego distributed requests:.
forbid proposals to 40- contractors to. provide the airport serviced
Three bids were received on February 21, 1986 They were..-
El
ere:El Camino Livery Service
California Paratrans t
Palomar Airporter
FINDINGS
The three: proposals were deemed technically qualified by an
evaluation panel and were opened on February 25, 1985 with El
Camino Livery Services submitting the low bid and rate structure.
AerT��
�..... ,n
FEB G 5 986 IT E M- (� l JTJ
Agenda Report
February, 25,. 1:985;
Page 2
a
Based on. City Council approval of the fare subsidy structure, a
°
contract wth.El Camino Livery Services will be: executed by the County
Board of Supervisors on March 18, 1986, subject to the contractor's.
submittal of a, performance bond and certificate of insurance,.
As a matter of comparison attached is the current subsidy schedule
�.
approved by City Council: on the: previous, contract agreement for Poway
!'
Airport Service.
RECOMMENDATION
-
i
it is recommended that the City Council approve..the attached subsidy,
and rate structure for airport service between -Poway and Lindbergh
Field.
JLBzJD3 sf.
Attachments-:
1), Fare Structure
2) Comparison subsidy schedule
r from, County f San. Diego
33Y Lette m o Co y o_ g
FEB, 2 59861TEM Petit
�Y
a
e
t
s
O;
C
Lr) o
Lc)Lo
n
tn
i Q) s-
a
O
;^
cr)
M
p
`—
M �.
tMa
4J` W
N oix,
0
'�
,.
Jim(. 44
s, e
U
_' •
4J
§ �..
••itt
'
4j JQ o
o •t- CJ)
Q
r
r
to
Q
'
'_
r-
ii V
w
M
_
Mi:
co
tn M-'
-
�.,
i
-a
o
�- vQ
r7:
O.
¢
4J
N
Rf t,p;
co
�a
0-
Q3:
- W
t-
QJ.:
'p
.G. �—
O d;
E W
p
CQ
p
M
p
M-
�.Lo
N.
N
Lo
N.
CL.
GQ1L'
.
C S-
SZ
rte.
LL
too.
r:
_.
ER:
CCl:.S. 'tLi'
r
Ln
Q'
Q
®
�✓
rr-�
U) 4J t/!:
Q} c `
0-
cL,oa
aFS
cL
o
in
C,
tn:
!;Cfm
•
c cis
�
�
3
.c
®;
�
�
c
e�
N;
M
ct
VD
FES 2:51986,
IT E M
The County reserves the right to withdraw this RFB at any time without
prior noti ce. Further, the County makes no presentations that any
agreement will be awarded to any bidder responding to this, RFB.. The
County expressly reserves. the right to reject any and al T bids
respondi nto this RFB without indicating= any reasons for such
q
re jection t o .. The County expressly reserves the right to waive any
minor irregul'ariities..
D. Ci ty of PoM. Subsidy
The: passenger fares WIT be, based on -the per, trip fare provided by the
Contractor an.d the subsidy level set: forth by the: City of Poway. The
following is an example: of the passenger fare format and subsidy level'
provided by the City of Poway:,
Tota.T
Subsidy Max.
Max.. Subsi dy To Be Net
Total PerL Paid` Pass.,
San Diego International Airport. Fare Pass. Contractor Fare
1. One passenger picked,up, or
delivered to a single location
in Poway. $17 $ 8 $ 8 $ 9
2.. Twoz passengers picked' up or
delivered to a s' ngl a Tocati on
In: Poway., $34 $ 8; $16 $18
3. Th.r. ee passengers_ picked: up or
delivered to a single location, .
i:n. Poway. $36 $ 5; $15 $21
4. Fourpassengers picked up or
del isvered. to a s ngl'e, location
in Poway. $38 5 $20 $28
5. Five or six passengers picked
up or delivered to a si ngl e
location in Poway. $60 $ 5' $25* $35
*Maxim= total subsidy is $25.
This example was the maximum.fare schedule. for the 1985 contract. period.
You w.i l.i: note the $8, and $5 per passenger subsidy level. Fallowing the
bid: opening; the City., of Poway wi11: make a final determ%nation: of the:
subsidy amount. The subsidy level shown above: should be used only as an
example and in no way be considered a guaranteed level:. The actual'
subsidy may be higher or., lower than: the level shown in the. above chart..
E.: RFB Addendums
Any changes to the: RFR requi.r.ements wi11 be made by addendum. All
addenda shalt. be signed' and attached to the respective Ud, Form.,
Failure to attach any, addenda may cause the bid to be. considered
nonresponsive., Such -bids may be rejected..
i
POWAY/TRANS
..3-
AIRPORT/SRY.4
2 `'
o r` a�Qt`yE IS TyFQ,
too
7. SAN DIEGO
0 5-0 0 1 Ergo
UNT'
C UO Y
v?s 1 0
,pM�CGC�`sd DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC R
4 � U C WQ OCS
BUILDING2 5555 OVERLAND AVENUE
GR'ANVILLE M. BOWMAN, Director SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 921:23
Offices. of: TELEPHONE; (619) 565-5177
County Engineer
County Road:' Commissioner February 25, 1986
County Surveyor
County Airports;
Flood Control
Liquid. Waste
Solid Waste
Transportation. Operations.
Lee Lewis. Ai:.
Di rector of Community Services =j
13325 C1 vi c Center Drive: :
Ci ty, of Poway
Poway, CA 92064 }!
Dea.r Mr. Lewis:
Subject: Subsidy for. Poway. Public Transit Airport Service
The County. of San Diego. has; received; birds for the provision: of Public Transi`a fr
Airport., t Ser. vice for the City, of Poway. Basted on the low bid,received, a sub:
.e s.i dy level is recommended for your City Council approval'.
On February 34: 1.986 , a request for bids was distributed: to approximately 40
contractor/operators., Three bids were received' on February 21, 1986 from the
fob l owi n.g, operators
1. El Caminol Livery
2.. California Paratr. ansi°t Services
3. Palomar Ai rporter
On February, 2.4,: 1986 a Technical Qualifications Committee deemed' all, three pro.
osal.s. as technically i qualified anresponsive.-
al res a
P y 4 P
On: February, 25,, 1986 the price bids were opened. E1. Camino Livery submitted the
low bid rate structure-. Based on the law bi d rate structure, fares and subsidy
levels are. recommended' in the attached table.
Based on: estimated trips, on an annual basis., the annual contractor subsidy-
required
ubsidyrequired would approximate $43,000. This represents a 13 percent increase over
the. previous airport services. {
The contract term. will be: from: March 19`, 1986 tol June 30,. 198T with two option
years thereafter if the City of Poway so desi res.
G
4
. .:+. u..r..-.-:...-..,.. _.. ...-.. ..--.i.. .Lia �4..."..'-•.""w..-.. .. :�..." N'. ": ..- •: ..... _ -. - - _...._ ... .s:-.., » u. -.. +._}rs 5Nn
r
18 February 1986.
escsvED
FEB 201986
DIY MANAnrrr—""
To: Mr. Bruce Tarzy, Council Member, City of Poway
From: Virginia Masten, 14127 Ezra. Lane, Poway
Re ` Concern over the noise from the North County Soccer Park
Dear Mr. Tarzy,
1 have enclosed a copy of a letter that 1 have sent to the Director of
Planning and a copy of a petition from the residents of my street, aski ng for a
reduction in the operating hours' of the North County Soccer Park. 1 have sent.
you copies because 1 believe it wasyou who voiced concerns over the noise
problem in our valley, when the Conditional Use Permit was granted,_
Please let me know if I have taken the proper steps to have this problem
reduced.,
Thank. you.
Si nnerel y,
Virginia Masten
s r
18 February 1986
To: -Director of Planning, City of Poway
From; Virginia Masten, 14127 Ezra Lane, Poway
Re The North .County Soccer Park
Dear sir:
I live on Ezra Lane in Poway, facing.the new North County Soccer'Park.
I` havel been -incontact. with the owners as -well as Jinn Lyons in your office
in recent weeks expressing my, concerns over this new business My,neighbors
and I have been talking at length about the: noise problem that has arisen after
the Soccer Park opened.. We feel that the disruption to our lives by the
continual pounding of bails against the backboards- and walls of the soccer field
and the "roar"of the crowds is bad enough, -to call this to your attentions
As was pointed out .by Counci 1 Members at the City Council meeting when. the Con-
di tional Use Permit was granted, ' the valley i n which we live has a soundi
resonating quality to i -t, sound being carried.at great distances as well as
bouncing off of the surrounding hillsides.
We are . not against the North County Soccer Park or the idea of a. healthy
sport being played by the: children of our. area. We -are against the noise
We feed that, as the enclosed' petition states,'the Soccer Park could continue
.to: operate: but at a reduced operating schedule. We chose- the new hours to
reflect closing at 8 pm instead" of 10 pm on work .nights. and opening, at 10 am
instead of 8 am on weekends (and Holidays) so that we can get to sleep without
:the use of ear.plugs�and awaken on our own instead of by the noise. We do, not
feel that this is unreasonable The signatures reflect all 10 homes: polled.
lit,
The first home on Ezra Lane* was. not polled 'due to •its distance from the soccer
field and:. its, setbackfrom the street. Added to the polling was- the: home which
ki lies between Ezra' Lane: and, Tierra Bonita Rd. because of. its close proximity
to the field .
Absent from the petition, yet still an important -point, was a concern as to
the choice. of trees which; will be planted 'along Rattlesnake Creek at 10 foot:
intervals.. We are to understand that only one. -third of the trees are evergreen
and fast growing. The choice of deciduous, slow growing; trees leads us. to
wonder what good they will do (particuarly in: the winter) to buffer the sound
of the field. Could you please check into- this?
Lastly, the fi el.d` lights are: a problem, although a lesser one than the noise.
Look'n.g north: from Ezra Lane,; the lights on the north *s:i de of the field glare
into our homes. Could you. please also look into what could: be done here?
Possibly., they have been mismoun-ted at a slight upward angle thereby shading
only their northern exposure and not the south. If that is nat the case, maybe
an extender shade could be added to: eliminate this problem..
I hope that we can work out these 4ifficulties as'soon as possible As
-the spokesperson for the residents involved, I -would appreciate a reply.
Thank ou.
Virg..4a Masten.
R _
PETITION
We, the residents of Ezra lane and adjoining properties facing the
North County Soccer Park, do hereby petition the City of Poway to change
the hours of operation in the Conditional Use Permit issued to the own-
ers of the above business from the present operating schedule of 8 am to l
10 pm seven days per week to the following schedule: Monday through:
Thursdays 8 am to 8' pm; Friday, 8 .am to 10 pm; Saturdays, 10 am to 10 pm
and Sunday 10 am to 8 pm
NAME ' ADDRESS SIGNATURE:
s • ' '1
tR (AA MA=W 1 12 =
------
QoAq
s
1441
04 ibrw
'00 &'
0
r
e
00.
------------
CIA hr - ld its' C7- r&- I k/Aa"
i Sfle17 ,&'2f¢1A-Pr Luc: f jtrC�Ui'
1
.er=e eler_ _� Pr_ P Peasa:.Z=sus=Dasa--.SQL"=SYS'% t
CL PQ w r4,44
r }
p
i
r
�yEt7&.(. l4 (41
----------------- ------_-_ e------
i�7 IN
Rm
/A Al -C. -J,
e
Le: e ire ee�.eere .r
=.r=Q:.==S:�3:SCi'Z�S :.'rSZS�S$Q'S=Q�:.SS �:.®:.Q:CSSeZSSQsSS:.Q:.=:i®S��St3SSSS�.Y•:ZS:.TS. - _
s rye _
m,
SS;:-eaaTss.-�=____ ea s ee _:PS.-.aaa a-P.-i'raSSZZ _SP=`S1'erSwQ=_��e eS�a��a===S'iZS=a=S==aair-
-�-sas=�a=�===safer-P-a,==oSaS=re�ee�rPoaS=Sr-Baa=SSa�=a.�err�e��aP_�-_aao=�Pw_e=a a=s � - ._
S=0�OPre=a=baa=.ae�=_,P__�r._�r.�_�ev�e_Ps=_-_Pee�.eeer_Pr rrP.are��P� eTie Qtr e�Pr�
,-
$'._P_PP_.r_err.ee__rreZ`ee.rP__e_r_Zire.�.iPri..r�S�'..'-_s�.asrre_O�Prsse.P�.rsersos-SPO_.
_r..��.reP'Z_e rPZS==a�.e%S�_ PPeQP_��erier�w _P_..r_e�ee-rPse�eeee