Item 1 - Pre-Development Conference 04-06 Lowes
TO:
FROM:
INITIATED BY:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
James L. Bowersox, City Man~
Niall Fritz, Director of Development services/
February 22, 2005
Pre-Development Conference (PDC) 04-06; Harlan Lowe, Applicant
.
ABSTRACT
Harlan Lowe, the owner of property located at 15348 Mina De Oro, h;;IS submitted a request that the
City Council consider: 1) amending the Master Water System Facilities Update Report to make
provisions for the extension of City water to east Poway along SR 67 that are not currently in the City
water service area; 2) study the costs of providing City water to east Poway; and 3) potentially fonning
an assessment district to cover the costs associated with providing City water to east Poway.
- ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Thisitem is not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
FISCAL IMPACT ,
None.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
A copy of this report was sent to the applicant.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council provide direction to staff and the applicant.
ACTION
-
I
M:\plannlng\05reportlpdclO4'06\sum.doc
1 of 17
February 22, 2005 Item # I
CITY OF POWAY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jam~ L B_=~ City Ma~ I
Niall Fritz, Director of Development Services .
Patti Brindle, City Planner fJ.!::.
Jason Martin, Senior Planne~
February 22, 2005
INITIATED BY:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Pre-Development Conference (PDC) 04-06; Hanan Lowe, Applicant
BACKGROUND
Hanan Lowe, the owner of property located at 15348 Mina De Ore, has submitted a
request that the City Council consider the following:
1. Amending the Master Water System Facilities Update Report to make
provisions for the extension of City water to east Poway along SR 67 that
are currently not in the City water service area;
2. Study the costs of providing City water to east Poway;
3. Potentially forming an assessment district to cover the costs associated
with providing City water to east Poway.
The applicant's submitted PDC request and the Agreement of Understanding is
included as Attachments A and B.
FINDINGS
On August 14, 2001, the City Council approved Resolution No. 01-081, adopting the
Master Water System Facilities Plan Update, which is also referred to as the Master
Plan Update. This Master Plan Update investigated the impacts of changes to land use
and water demands, and provided a basis for a capital improvement plan and rate
structure for water improvements.
The Master Plan Update was completed with the understanding that the City would
provide water only to those areas that could be served from both the existing City water
system and two new reservoirs in North Poway planned by developers for projects
2 of 17
February 22, 2005 Item # ~
Agenda Report
February 22, 2005
Page 2
already underway. In maintaining this philosophy, the Master Plan Update included
adoption ofa policy related to future extensions oHhe water system. Under this policy,
the City defined the limits of the areas that can be. served by the existing water system.
Those areas that cannot be served are designated as " no service" areas and would not
be provided City water service. The City Council Resolution is included as Attachment
C.
The service area limits were established using a hydraulic model that determined the
maximum elevation at which the existing water system could meet City fire protection
criteria. The approximate limits of the service area and "no service" area are depicted in
Attachment D. A large segment of the "no service" area lies within the eastern portion
of Poway.
Recently, several owners of properties in the "no service area" of east poway expressed
interest in extending the City's water system. Their primary concems include the drying
up of wells and the cost of trucking in water; and the lack of a steady, reliable source of
water, especially during wildfire events such as the Cedar Fire.
The general area in which the water system would be expanded consists of the area
south/south east of High Valley and north/northeast of Blue Crystal Trail and along
Highway 67. The area is approximately 1,800 acres in size and sparely developed with
approximately 80 homes. The Area Map is included as Attachment E.
Water Extension Costs
The costs associated with extending water to east Poway can be generally categorized
into 3 main areas: design and construction, environmental, and assessment district
formation and administration. A brief discussion of each, and very preliminary
estimates of costs (where possible to estimate), follows:
Desion and Construction - In proposing an extension of the City's existing water system
to the "no service" area, it is likely that there are several alternative design schemes to
be considered. While each altemative would have its own merits and shortcomings, it is
expected that any aitemative to extending the City's water system beyond the existing
service area would require the provision of new major facilities such as reservoirs,
pumping stations, pressure reducing stations and pipelines, as well as a program to
maintain these facilities.
Staff has performed a conceptual analysis of one altemative that involves the expansion
of the existing Blue Crystal water system. Currently, this system serves the area south
of Poway Road, south and east of Espola Road, and west of Highway 67. Water to this
system is supplied from the City's water treatment plant and pumped via the Woodcliff
pump station to the Blue Crystal Reservoir. It is anticipated that expanding this water
system to the "no service" area would require the following:
3 of 17
February 22, 2005 Item # l
Agenda Report
February 22, 2005
Page 3
. A 1.5-million-gallon reservoir, to be located east of Highway 67, qt an
elevation of 1,800 feet, probably on the lower slopes of Iron Mountain.
. A pump station and a 16" force main pipeline to feed the new reservoir
from the existing Blue Crystal Reservoir. The pump station would be
located near the Blue Crystal Reservoir site. The required length of the
force main pipeline is estimated to be a little over 3 miles (or 16,600 feet).
. Three pressure-reducing stations and 10.4 miles (55,000 lineal feet) of10"
water main pipeline to provide water for three pressure zones. within the
subject area. These pressure zones will be established at elevations 1100,
1450, and 1800.
. Approximately 1 mile (5,000 lineal feet) of additional water main pipeline to
connect this new water system to the Skyridge Reservoir in High Valley to
create a looped system and address water quality issues.
. Provision for the City to maintain and upkeep these facilities.
. An evaluation of the existing City facilities that provide water to the Blue
Crystal system to determine whether there is adequate capacity within
these existing components to accommodate the expansion, or if upgrades
are required. For example, an expansion of the City's treatment plant may
be required to accommodate the expanded water system, the cost of
which could be as high as $15 million.
The facilities, as described above, would serve as the primary components of the
expanded water system. Additional water main pipelines, branched off from these
facilities, would be provided as development occurs.
Environmental- Extension of water to east Poway would have costs in the areas of
habitat impact mitigation, and costs associated with the prepqration of an Environmental
Impact Report. Extension of water infrastructure (pipelines, reservoirs, and PLlmp
stations) will impact a large amount of natural habitat that will need to be mitigqted at
the rate of approximately $10,000 per acre. It is likely that some new pipeline
construction could occur within existing roadways where mitigation would not be
needed. It is also likely that some new pipelines could be installed by developers; in
this case, responsibility for mitigation would be boms by the developer. The installation
of remaining pipeline and. construction of the pump stations and the reservoir would
need to be mitigated. Preliminary estimates of this impact range from 10 - 1.4 acres of
impact, requiring 20 - 28 acres of mitigation.
Assessment District - The costs associated with the extension of water could be
financed though an assessment district, which ultimately would need to be approved by
4 of 17
February 22, 2005 Item # l
Agenda Report
February 22, 2005
Page 4
benefiting properties. ' There are added costs associated with establishment and
administration of an assessment district, including the interest costs for borrowing the
initial construction money. The cost would typically be allocated to benefiting properties
through the assessment district.
The minimum estimated costs are as follows:
Design and Re$ervoir (1.5 million oallons) $ 3,000,000
Construction Pumc station Blue Crvstal Reservoir (1) 1,500,000
Force Main (16,OOO feet) .2,500,000
Pressure reducino station (3) 600,000
Water Main Piceline (55,OOO feet) 8,500,000
Looced Une to Skvridoe Reservoir . 750,000
Rioht of Wav ACQuisition * Unknown
Existino System UDOrades" Unknown
Sub Total 16,850,000
30% Continaencv 5,000,000
Estimated Annual Maintenance 200,000
Sub Total 22,050,000
Environmental Habitat Impact Mitioation 200,OOO~ 280,000
Environmentallmcact Recort 150,000-250,000
Sub Total 22,240,000 - 22,580,000
Asses$ment Formation and Administration* Unknown
District Interest at 5% for $23 million over 20 36,640,000
vear$
Sub Total 36,640,000
Estimated Minimum Total Costs (including Interest) $ 59,040,000 ~ 59,220,000
"It is important to note that this cost estimate lists as "unknown" the cost$ associated
with potential upgrades to the existing water system facilities. It is likely that the existing
water main leading to Blue Crystal Reservoir would need to be up sized, the costs of
which can only be estimated following additional analysis andevaluatipn.
Powav Subarea Habitat Conservation Plan Consistencv (HCP)
The HCP fulfills requirements pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Federal Endangered
Species Act (ESA); Sections 2081 and 2835 of the State Fish and Game Code and the
Califomia Endangered Species Act (CESA); and the State of Califomia's Natural
Communities Conservation Planning (NCCP) Act of 1991. It is also consi$tent with
regional and sub-regional planning efforts within San Diego County, pursuant to the
NCCP Act. The HCP reflects the biological resource conservation goals,
50f17
February 22, 2005 Item # L
Agenda Report
February 22, 2005
Page 5
implementation strategies and mitigation measures of thE! Poway General Plan, as well
as the objectives of the NCCP Act.
Section 6(A)(4) of the Implementing Agreement for the HCP that exists between the City
and the Federal and State. resource protection agencies states as follows:
Approximately 8,000 acres within the Mitigation Area are designated Rur~1
Residential and are potentially available for .low~ensity residential development
under the Poway General Plan. As discussed in detaif in Section 4 of the
PSHCP, this designation could potentially support up to 1,100 dwelling units, with
a resulting disturbance of approximately 1,870 aces of land, if the City is able to
extend a potable water supply to these lands. Prior to approving any project that
would extend water hook-ups to those areas within the Mitigation Area that are
not currently serviced by the City's municipal water supply system, the City shall
confer with the USFWS and CDFG to insure that extension of the water supply is
designed and structured in a manner that minimizes habitat disturbance,
fragmentation and edge effects within the Mitigation Area. All land disturbance
within the Rural Residential zoning classification shall, to the maximum extent
poss.ible, be confined to areas of lower biological sensitivity consistent with the
preserve design, shall be subject to the special development requirements and
mitigation measures provided in Section 7 of the PSHCP, and shall insure the
permanent conservation of approximately 6,930 acres ofland.
Prior to the extension of water to the area, consultation with the resource agencies will
be required. Many properties in east Poway have significant biological value. Currently
in the study area, approximately 110 acres are within recorded Biological Conservation
Easements (BCEs) and are zoned Open Space-Resource Management (OS-RM). This
acreage is part of along range, habitat preserve design for the area which is considered
under the HCP to be an important wildlife corridor. While the HCP included. the
possibility of City water being extended throughout the preserve with additiorialhomes
as allowed by the General Plan, more development may affect the preserve design
through fragmentation and could adversely affect wildlife movement. These are two
major HCP implementation concems that have been raised in recent years by the
USFWS and CDFG.
Growth-Inducinq Imcact
The extension of City water service to the area would enable additional residential
development within east Poway. Approximately 80 homes have been built or are
expected to be built in the upcoming year. Continued use of private water wells may
allow an estimated 70 more homes to be built, .for a total of approximately 150. Based
upon previous studies, the extension of the City water is estimated to enable about 200
additional. homes to be developed, for a total of 350. The Area Map included as
6 of 17
February 22, 2005 Item # l
Agenda Report
February 22, 2005
Page 6
Attachment E shows existing dwellings and dwellings expected to be constructed this
year.
During the last several years, east Poway has come under increasing development
pressure. Last year, a General Plan amendment initiative (Proposition E) to redesignate
20 acres to Automotive/General Commercial was Tejectedby voters. The City has
previously been approached by the Palomar Community College District to explore
building a 100-acre campus along SR 67. Several residential development inquiries
involving more intense development than allowed by the General Plan have also been
made. These include the Tierra Thoroughbred Farms properties on the southwest
comer of Poway Road and SR 67 (235 acres), the undeveloped Phase Hportion of the
Lucidi Farms project at the northwest. comer of PoWay Road and SR 67, the Poway
Development Company properties on the east side of SR 67 (approxiniately 600 acres),
and the SAN REX property (317 acres) located southwest of the Thoroughbred Farms
properties. All of these proposals require the extension of City water.
The growth inducement resulting from the extension of City water to east PoWay would
include impacts to biological resources, open space, traffic, air quality, and public
services including police, fire and schools. Because of these issues, any proposal to
extend water would require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR).
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This item is not subject to the requirements of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
A copy of this report was sent to the applicant
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council. provide direction to staff and the applicant
Attachments:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Applicant's Pre-Development Conference Request
Agreement of Understanding
City Council Resolution No. 01-081
No Service Area Map
Area Map with Dwellings
M:\plannlngI05repartlpdc\04-06\agn.dOC
7 of 17
February 22, 2P05 Item # I
CITY OF POWAY
Development Services
Department
Planning Division Application
13325 Civic Center Drive
Poway, CA 92064 (858) 668-4600 FAX (858) 668-1211
. SITE INFORMATION
Name of Project Wp-fer 11;;> ~ T- !fbU/jII\../
Property Address !3f).,J ~ f70/N'''''/ f
I
APN
Zoning
. REVIEW REQ(,IESTED
o CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
o DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
o EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
o GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
o MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
o MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
o MODIFICATION TO
Rle Number
FOR CITY USE ONLY
fDC--- 04 - 0 fo
t~ . /- 0 'f
Application Date
Related FUe(s)
Fees
%
Receipt
Staff Planner
Existing Square Foota.ge
Hazardous Material Site (circle one}
Site Acreage
Redevelopment Area (cln;Jeone)
Proposed
YES NO
YES NO
o SPECIFIC PLAN
o SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
o TENTATIVE PAACEl MAp
o TENTATIVE TAAcT MAP
O. UNDERGROUND WAIVER
o ZONE CHANGE
o VARIANCE
o PRE-APPLICATION
~HER
· COMPLETE PROJECT DESCRIPTION
(fJ N4e,J. -blee-verro ? r?o / 1:/ ~ (/hbfJI!. / dLMJ..o.... ""=>
C;-PAl.J.e a.re.a. t:)~ ~": d'Pf'IAtP _ (;).f':l-U+,;;I ~~
.!w-/'1of jA/,,-:k.r rv ;(e..>>e!..?_r.=r o.,/.. ett.JJ:r rrav.,.C:__ _r-......<..- __~
.:;/, :. fflC--h -
(~ ~~t*-6tt=$)
THIS SEC110N MUST BE COMPLETEt)-.
· PROPERTY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE
~ame #.c...r~.., A.C7~
~:;:~~a~:'~~:S ~{: c::J;;j~ O~
relephone /- ~_
r CERTIFY THA T I AM THE LEGAL OWNER'S
~EPRESENTA TIVE AND THA T ALL THE ABOVE
WFORMA TION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE
rHE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
3~DATE
8 of 17
,jngapp,doc
ATTACHMENT A
. PROPERTY OWNER
Name S/.A.,YMe...-
MaJlJnll Address
City, State, Zip
Telephone
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER
AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS
TRUE AND CORRECT TO BEST OF MY
K~
SIGNATURE and DATE
February 22, 2005 Item # ,
Bring City Water to East Poway for the
Health, Safety and Welfare of Those in Need.
fD c.. Ot(.. ~
8-3-04
To:
Jim Bowersox (City Manager)
Niall Fritz (Director of development Services)
City Council Members
R12C12IV12D
DEC 0 I 2004
CITy.
DEVELOPI.r PC/WAY
. ENT SERVICEs
Residents of East Poway Request a Master Study be completed to
determine the cost to bring city water services to those of us in East
Poway. The study should consider: 1) The cost with our present
ability to distribute the expenses over the number of 4-acre-
minimum lots that will be avaDable to participate financially, and 2)
The future higher cost, if large parcels are divided into 20 acre lots
and cannot be further subdivided further into 4-acre lots; This would
mean fewer participants to share in the ~~sts at a time when the
draught could possibly be worse & the City would have no
alternative but to extend water.
Residents of East Poway incurred devastating losses during the fire of October 2003 due
in part to the lack of city water services in the area. Most of us have had our water wells
either dry up or dramatically lower production. Some have had to drill multiple wells
recently; well drillers are finding that a minimum amount of water is available due to the
continued lowering of our water table. Some of us truck in water just to meet their
everyday needs. Longtime residents have drilled new wells, 1000' feet and deeper, only
to get 11> a gallon of water a minute - imagine trying to live in those conditions and then
expect firefighters to fight a fire with that amount of water. Our city council members
should and must develop a plan to bring water to ALL East Poway residents before our
water table lowers to the point that requires us to spend more on new wells than we
would spend on paying for the city water to be extended to us, or worse yet finding we
can't find water any longer. While at the same time, reducing the likelihood of SUch a
catastrophe like we had with the cedar fire from ever happening again.
We believe that extending city water services to tIle residents of East Poway is feasible,
necessary and beneficial for our health safety and welfare. Our zoning allows RRA.
zoning of20-acre minimum lot size without city water and 4-acre minimum lot size with
city water available. As the remaining large parcels in our area life split into 20-acre
parcels, more wells are being drilled, thus creating even more competition for our
dwindling water supply.
Wby the economics sbow it is wise to bring City Water Eastward now insteadoC
later?
Example, at the 20-acre minimum, without city water, a 100-acre parcel can support a
maximum of only five homes; this is before allowing for reduction due to slope criteria.
With city water a l00-acre parcel could support a maximum of25 homes if the land was
flat <not the case) and less depending on the slope. The additional lots that could be
created by having City Water prior to dividing into large 20-acre lots would enable more
participants to share in the costs for the water bonds necessary for the extension of city
9 of 17
February 22, 2005 Item # L
water. With 4-acre minimum lot sizes ml!l city water our area would be one of the most
desirable in the County, Similar to North Poway, The Trails in RB and portions of
Rancho Sante Fe.
Probably the most common response that you will hear when talking to others about
bringing water to east Poway is, "but it will bring high density to the last remaining rural
area in our city". This is Not the case, in order for future lots to be created smaller than 4
acres, there would have to be a petition followed by a proposition.. A recent example of
someone trying to change the zoning was the recent prop A that was overwhelmingly
voted down in our last local elections. Bringing water to East Poway will not enable
someone to build high-density housing or commercial property. Consider the High Valley
area, they have City water and 2 acre minimum zoning were we would have four acre
minimum zoning ftomany new land divisions.
.
Some of the ways city water would help those of us in East Poway:
· Provide a steady and reliable source of water for our Health Safety and Welfare.
· Providing water for fire fighting which will save lives and homes.
· Beautification of landscape that will enhance the area.
· Peace of mind for residents who have had to wony about wells drying up and the
expenses associated with providing needed water, or worse yet finding we can't
find water any longer
· Increased property Values (which should more than offset the cost to bring us
water)
Other benefits
· Providing a larger fire fighting defensible space around the city would help
firefighters fight future fires.
· Increasing the tax base/revenue would help the City.
It would benefit all Poway residents by:
· Knowing that they have helped their fellow Poway residents swvive the next wild
fifes and, that by helping their neighbors they have helped prevent future tires
ftom destroying their own homes and property by creating a larger defensible
space for fire fighters.
We a1110ve our city and are proud to live here. We ask our city council to never forget
the losses of houses and property, but homes, memories, and lives reduced to ashes.
We're not asking for much. Water,
At the rate our wells are drying up, the day is nearing that their successors will ask why
the previous Mayor and city council allowed this to happen.
Thank you,
Harlan Lowe
15348 MinaDe Oro
Poway, Ca. 92064
10 of 17
February 22, 2005 Item # I
,-
11 of 17
,,;
'5
..,
'f) ~
...
....
C> '"
-s~ ~ ~
..~ ~ z u
.8_ Z .....
-;; ~ ~
"B<s .....
~ 0
1 ~ 0 p::j ~
u rn
"'::!:i >-<
.- C>
~~ ~ E-o 0
~] 0 ..... Z
~ ~ u
!~ 0
u
gen .
~:E
1<1 :s
~:I:
~\ ,#
--
\
-- \
,--_.~)
--
--:--~+_._-\
"-
~ ~2~,~ L-_._".
~
~
I
rn
o
.
RECEIVED
DEC 01"''',
E-o
U
~
....
o~
~~
P-......
:>-
o~
E-o~
E-08
u~
~.....
....u
p:j~
~o...
rnrn
r UuW/.Y
Cll Y {Jr r (Tr7 'jrh.\
[)~\I'" "p"ern Item #i-
22 2005
February ,
- --~I --J
--:--
...-... ..
AGREEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING
v"OG ott.....OCo
RE:CE:IV12D .
DEe 0 1 lOOf
.cITy OF
D8IELOPMEJ;oWAY
SERVIOES
CiIy Council for the City of Poway, hereinafter referred to as 'City' and
J!rV/rLJ1 L& ~ . hereinafter. referred to as 'Proponenf enter into tHis
Agreement of Understanding based upon the fonowing facts: .
Proponent owns or has an equitable interest in land described by tax Assessor's Parcel
3"Z-1 - 1/(;;1- &1 7-a::::>
Number(s) -:2. 7~ :< Cb- /7 -iC> . Proponent desires to develop this
property in accordance with the will of the City and without the expense of a protracted
development.
City is concerned that Proponent will create development plans unsatisfactory to City
and consume time and effort of City employees needlessly on unsatisfactory development
plans unless CiIy assists in directing Proponent.
Based upon the above-mentioned facts, City will grant Proponent a hearing prior to
filing any application for development upon the following understanding:
a. City will render no decision with regards to any development proposal or part
thereof.
b. City will receive no evidence, specific in nature, in support of a particular
development plan.
c. City will make no representations that will obligate the City to render a decision
. in favor of or against any development proposal or part thereof Proponent may
subsequently submit.
d. If any development proposal is subsequently submitted, Proponent will proceed
at its sole and exclusive risk with the understanding that City has made no
representations upon which Proponent may rely.
Dated: J/-28'-OY
Proponent: ~
" Signature
.
12 of 17
ATTACHMENT B
February 22, 2005 Item # I
.-
RESOLUTION NO. 01-081
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING THE MASTER WATER SYSTEM FACILITIES PLAN UPDATE: - POTABLE
WATER,INCLUDING A POLICY REGARDING FUTURE EXTENSIONS OF THE
POTABLE WATER SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the City of Poway currently provides potable water service to many
areas within the City limits. The existing wilter distribution system currently extends
service to most of the areas that can be readily served; and
WHEREAS, the City of Poway has established water system criteria in order to
provide water that meets service goals (such as pressure), regulatory requirements
(such as water quality), and safety requirements (such as fire flow capacity); and
WHEREAS, the City of Poway has caused a study to be done of current and
future needs for potable water, in accordance with the curFent General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Poway has recently completed aniJpdate to the Water
Master Plan (August 2001). The Master Plan investigated the impacts of changes to
land use and water demands, and identified future capital projects needed to maintain
the desired levels of service within the existing service area; and
WHEREAS, as part of the recent Water Mast~ Plan Update, the limits of the
areas that can be served by the existing water system have been determined. The
service area limits were delineated using the hydraulic model results and the maximum
elevation that the existing water system could provide fire protection for the reasons
stated by the Department of Safety Services. (A flow of 1,500 gallons per minute with a
pressure of at least 20 pounds per square inch.) In remote areas a hypothetical ,
,
extension of an 8-inch diameter pipe was assumed in order to calculate the maximum
fire protection elevation. The limits (fringe area) defined in the Master Plan are
approximate and are considered a guideline.
!
\
Fringe areas that cannot be served by the existing water system, as defined
above, are generally characterized by elevations above the existing water reservoirs.
Also, these areas are zoned for very low-density rural residential development and
Open Space-Resource Management. To extend water service beyond the existing
system service area typically requires the installation of major new facilities, such as
pumping stations, storage facilities, and pipelines; and
WHEREAS, the results of this study prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation
are contained in the document entitled"Master Water System FacUities Plan Update _
Potable Water (August 2001)."
13 of 17
ATTACHMENT C
February 22, 2005 Item #
.
Resolution No. 01-081
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the "Master Water System
Facilities Plan Update - Potable Water (August 2001)" accurately represents the future
potable water needs ofthe citizens of Poway. Therefore, the City Council does hereby
adopt the aforementioned Master Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Poway has defined the limits of
the areas that can be served by the existing water system. Areas that cannot be
served by the existing water system are designated as "no service" areas. The
approximate limits of these areas are depicted in the "Master Water System Facilities
Plan Update - Potable Water (August 2001)."
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Poway will not provide water
service to a parcel or parcels located in a "no service" area. Property owners who are
on the border of the sefVice area limits may prepare an individual hydraulic study for
review by City staff to better define the service area limits on their property. Depending
upon the results of such a study, the City may allow City water service to be extended
to the parcel(s). .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City will allow water ser'Vlceto be
extended from the existing City water system to an existing parcel for an individual
house that is in the "no service" area, only where abutting homes at equal or greater
elevations have already been provided potable water service. All water delivery
facilities shall comply with City codes, standards, and requirements; and all costs shall
be borne by the property owner.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Poway also
approve the Negative Declaration.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the City Council ofthe City of Poway
at a regular meeting this 14th day of August 2001.
./
/
r
ATTEST:
14 of 17
solutions'9o!ablewaterservicearea.0814.DOC
February 22, 2005 Item # . I
Ie' "" 4
)-
Resolution NO.OI-081
Page 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO)
I, Lori Anne Peoples, City Clerk of the City of Poway, do hereby certify under
penalty of pe~ury that the foregoing Resolution No. 01-08lwas duly adopted by the City
Council at a meeting of said City Council held on the 14th day of August 2001, and that
it was so adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
~MERY, HIGGINSON, REXFORD, CAFAGNA
NOES:
GOlDBY
ABSTAIN:
NONE
NONE
~ ~
: . () \
'. . &u- A~ .cPPliJr
Lori nne Peoples, City ClerkF<
City of ~ow!lY
.ABSENT:
,
,
15 of 17
ution$'f>oIablewaterserviceareasos14.DOC
February 22, 2005 Item # I
.
AJ<. C nvA. O....A&oI:I; .I. =ouuu
COLOR CODING
D CITY BOUNDARY
. NO SERVICE
. OS-RM
. SUBJECT TO PROJECT I
SPECIFIC REVIEW
16 of 17 ATTACHMENT D February 22, 2005 Item # I
j""""j
-''''-
.""""""
APPROX. SCALE: 1"=5000'
,-
t iI': I ,.j
!'':' i i '1'1
i !'1''\1.~ i
- _ '-.Ir .WI ~,_l ;-~___-' I
~ -~p~~~ i(~,p;:Ui /' i__~~,-j,_' ,
, 1\.,'nirl"'lfL~'ll' .', '
.:1",\\,\ \~_.;/.','/- '_,!._..' T ,"~,il',u_...il J.
\ . , '. \i .L! .: 1.i'."~,IJ).lt .j>.',!i{\ r i ,
k "P""iJj1iJITiI! 1.,',11, I
":,~ ,.,\\,*ICI] m'J1ln, -'i- .'
~A!)t .( :~'_ ,1,-\\ T]~ tl: ~ ,
~~/\\, I f-'cc ".Jltu,! j~. C. I j. '
r~<>":...'(r_, "\, I I ' ; 'I
)-i'~": ...1,\ '~;:-"---l ,. \
'illr fA 1
'~1} ")'
UlJf
COLOR CODING
D CITY BOUNDARY
. NO SERVICE
. OS-RM
-rei
-~;~l
SUBJECT TO PROJECT
SPECIFIC REVIEW
16 of 17
ATTACHMENT D
February 22, 2005 Item # I