Item 6 - CSP 04-03(M) Kirkham Road LLC
AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
TO:
FROM:
Honorable Mayor and Member~ ~e City Council
James L. Bowersox, City Mana~
Niall Fritz, Director of Development Services j?'
February 22, 2005
INITIATED BY:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
A Modification to Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) 04-03(M), Kirkham Road,
LLC, Applicant. APN: 323-090-89.
ABSTRACT
The applicant is requesting approval to modify the Comprehensive Sign Program for the Kirkham
Ridge Business Park, located at 14035-14055 Kirkham Way, within the Planned Community (PC)
zone. The original Comprehensive Sign Program was approved on October 12, 2004, by Resolution
No. P-04-75. The applicant proposes to allow tenants to place wall signs on Building C and eliminate
the ~" thick aluminum background requirement for Sign Type B.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This proposed project is Categorically Exempt (Class 11) from the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15311 of the CEQA Guidelines, in that it is for the placement of
minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing facilities.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Vince Ferrer, Kirkham Road, LLC.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve CSP 04-03(M), subject to the conditions contained
in the attached proposed Resolution.
ACTION
L
M:\planningI05reportlcspl04-Q3Mlsum.doc
1 of 10
7/1103
February 22, 2005 Item # ~
CITY OF POWA Y
AGENDA REPORT
This repo~ is included on the Consent Calendar. There will be no separate discussion of the report prior to approval by the City
Council unless members of the Council, staff or public request it to be removed from the Consent Calendar and discussed
separately. If you wish to have this report pulled for discussion. please fill out a slip indicating the report number and give it to
the City Clerk prior to the beginning of the City Council meeting.
FROM:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
James L. Bowersox, City Man~
Niall Fritz, Director of Development Services r
Patti Brindle, City Planner (1.e:::
Jason Martin, Senior Planner CJvt-
Ray Carreon, Development Services Technician f&<!-'
TO:
INITIATED BY:
DATE:
February 22, 2005
SUBJECT:
A Modification to Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) 04-03(M),
Kirkham Road, LLC, Applicant. A request to modify the
Comprehensive Sign Program for the Kirkham Ridge Business Park,
located at 14035-14055 Kirkham Way, within the Planned Community
(PC) zone, to allow wall signage on Building C and eliminate the
Yo" thick aluminum background requirement for Sign Type B.
APN: 323-090-89
BACKGROUND
The Kirkham Ridge Business Park is located at 14035-14055 Kirkham Way, east of Stowe
Drive, as shown on Attachment B. The subject property consists of three separate
buildings under single ownership. The original Comprehensive Sign Program, CSP 04.03,
was approved by the City Council on October 12; 2004, by Resolution No. P-04-75.
Section 17.40.180 of the Poway Municipal Code (PMC) and the South Poway Specific Plan
(SPSP) require City Council approval for Comprehensive Sign Programs and any
amendments to approved CSPs. The PMC and SPSP allow the City Council to apply
conditions of approval to CSPs to integrate signs with the building and landscape design
to form a unified architectural unit.
FINDINGS
The wall sign criteria proposed with CSP 04.o3(M) complies with the Comprehensive Sign
Program standards of the Poway Municipal Code and the South Poway Specific Plan as
follows:
. '-'"
,
y
2 of 10
February 22, 2005 Item # f..t,
Agenda Report
February 22, 2005
Page 2
1. Using the same background color on all signs:
The same background color will be used on aU signs in that proposed wall signs will
be mounted directly on the 3" thick aluminum cabinet for Sign Type A or the wall of
the building for Sign Type B, as shown on Attachments C and D.
2. Using no more than three different colors for sign lettering:
Sign Type A will utilize #22 black vinyl graphics. In addition to white, Sign Type B
lettering on waU signage may have the fOllowing colors: #33 Red, #22 Black, or #67
Blue. Tenants that are part of a chain of stores with a nationally recognized sign
design may utilize colors other than the approved colors.
3. Using the same type of cabinet supports, or method of mounting, for signs of the
same type of construction material for components, such as sign copy, cabinets
and supports, or by using dissimilar signing determined compatible by the Director
of Development Services:
Proposed waU signs will be constructed of either non-illuminated aluminum cabinets
with applied #22 black vinyl graphics or non-illuminated 3Yz" thick foam, aluminum
or plex individual letters mounted directly to the wall of the building. These signs
are compatible in appearance.
4. Using the same form of illumination for all signs, or by using varied forms of
illumination determined compatible by the Director of Development Services:
Comprehensive Sign Program 04-03(M) will allow the use of non-illuminated signs.
5. Allowing the use of different colors for logos:
Comprehensive Sign Program 04-03(M) will allow the Use of different colors for
tenant logos, upon the approval of the Director of Development Services through
the individual Sign Permit process.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This proposed project is Categorically Exempt (Class 11) from the Califomia Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15311 of the CEQA Guidelines, in that it is for the
placement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing facilities.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
3 of 10
February 22, 2005 Item # ~
Agenda Report
February 22, 2005
Page 3
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Vince Ferrer, Kirkham Road, LLC.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve CSP 04.o3(M), subject to the conditions
contained in the attached proposed Resolution.
Attachments:
A. Proposed Resolution
B. Site Plan
C. Sign Type A Elevation
D. Sign Type B Elevation
M:\plannlngI05report\cspI04-03M\agn.doc
4 of 10
February 22, 2005 Item # (p
RESOLUTION NO. P-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA
APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO
COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM 04-03(M)
AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. P-04-75
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 323-090-89
WHEREAS, Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) 04-03(M), submitted by
Kirkham Road, LLC, Applicant, requests the approval of a modification to the
Comprehensive Sign Program for the Kirkham Ridge Business Park, located at 14035-
14055 Kirkham Way, within the South Poway Planned Community zone.
WHEREAS, on February 22, 2005, the City Council considered the above-
referenced item.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Poway, as follows:
Section 1: This proposed project is Categorically Exempt (Class 11) from the
Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15311 of the CEQA
Guidelines, in that it is for the placement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant
to) existing facilities.
Section 2: The proposed use is in accordance with the purposes and standards
contained in the Poway Municipal Code and the South Poway Specific Plan.
Section 3: The City Council hereby rescinds Resolution No. P-04-75 and approves
Comprehensive Sign Program 04-03(M), subject to the following conditions:
A. Within 30 days of approval, the applicant shall submit in writing that all conditions
of approval have been read and understood.
B. All signs shall conform to the sign criteria-and design guidelines contained within
the South Poway Specific Plan Development Standards and the general
provisions of the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance of the Poway Municipal Code,
as amended from time to time.
C. The following design standards shall apply to all tenants within the business park:
1. The same background color will be used on all signs in that proposed wall
signs will be mounted directly on the 3" thick aluminum cabinet for Sign
Type A or the wall of the building for Sign Type B.
5 of 10
ATTACHMENT A
February 22, 2005 Item # b
Resolution No. P-
Page 2
2. Sign Type A will utilize #22 black vinyl graphics. In addition to white, Sign
Type B lettering on wall signage may have the following colors: #33 Red,
#22 Black, or #67 Blue. Tenants that are part of a chain of stores with a
nationally recognized sign design may utilize colors other than the
approved colors.
3. Proposed wall signs will be constructed of either non-illuminated aluminum
cabinets with applied #22 black vinyl graphics or non-illuminated 3W thick
foam, aluminum or plex individual letters mounted directly on the wall of
the building. These signs are compatible in appearance.
4. Comprehensive Sign Program 04-03(M) will allow the use of non-
illuminated signs.
5. Comprehensive Sign Program 04-03(M) will allow the use of different
colors for tenant logos, upon the approval of the Director of Development
Services through the individual Sign Permit process.
6. The maximum number of wall signs allowed for anyone business shall be
one per street or parking area frontage, not to exceed two.
D. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with Chapter 17.40 of the
Zoning Code and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of Sign
Permit issuance.
E. Prior to installing a sign, the applicant shall obtain a Sign Permit from the
Planning Division and any necessary BuildingDivisionpermits.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVE,D by the City Council of the City of Poway,
State of California, at a regular meeting this 22nd day of February 2005.
Michael P. Cafagna, Mayor
ATTEST:
L. Diane Shea, City Clerk
6 of 10
February 22, 2005 Item # ~
Resolution No. p.
Page 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
I, L. Diane Shea, City Clerk of the City of Poway, do hereby certify under penalty
of perjury, that the foregoing Resolution No. P- was duly adopted by the City
Council at a meeting of said City Council held on the 22nd day of February 2005, and.
that itwas so adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
L. Diane Shea, City Clerk
City of Poway
M:\pIanningI05reportlcspl04-03M1tes,doc
7 of 10
February 22, 2005 Item # 10
~s
\\
ill \ ~,
\ \ . q
\ i Hi
~~ \ \ ~
'\ '
\ I \
1 II .
, I
\ \
i I
\ \
i I
i !
I '
II
I,!
1:1
j if
111
' ,
, I
\
\
J,M\
\ \ \
\-----1 '
I "
\! \ \
\J \ \
; \i
i \\
, 'I
i II
I'
\~
\'\
~ \
'\\
-,
\\
. \\
i!, \\
'J \ \
" \.
\., \\
I \
I \
\ \
--"\~
9
I!!
'"
'"
"
~
<
>
~
o
:;:
'"
N
~
~
m
'"
I:J
~
S
~
~
~
~
~
.1
~
t
i
,
"
~
'"
o
II'
z
:;:
~
z
~
z
if
'"
8
'"
i
i!!
z
'"
=>
m
:3
"
..
! -'..~..
i '.-,.
:
~
2
~
2
February 22, 2005 Item # lJJ
8 of 10
ATTACHMENT B
"
co
o
;f
/,....
,
J
/
(;~
J I I 9
ct .,~J ~ I i
I ~
.
..~ ..~ ~ ;!;
, I, I 0
i ~ ! N
1- ~.
I N
I :g
&:a ~
w ~
~ 0
in
z: it
.. ~ .
~ ;;
f!~~j ~
.~.
~
0
f
H- ~~~ ~ (5
..
w
.1 li ;., ;., 3i
f- ~~i -1 m
is
~
..
H ~
~ u
... i
t ~
..
::>
m
8
~
~
2
~
"
u
9 of 10
ATTACHMENTC
February 22, 2005 Item # to
.
J
~
~
~
.1
~
t
10 of 10
1-
~ " "
~ . Ii: ~ z z ~
d 5 5
~ 5 !'i !i! 5
~ '" .. M ~
i;j 0 IfI ;1 i " 11
'" i '" c ~ w
~ It! 3
1 m m
~ i ~ ~ ~ J:
~I :i ~ ~ ~
i:
~ 1011
~I 0
..
.
"
,~~
"
,
r!1
-----------, ~
i!i
;;
~
~
'"
o
~ ~
~ ~
M M
f- ~~~ -j
'"
, Iii
i ! I, I!
I" IUI
! I: !! .
! !t .! !1 Ii
'.- I~' jl
niir-i! I,
. ;'-.__._.._n_:'
i; ii
i!
.E-i
Z
<
Z
~
;;
Ii
!! :
Ii
.,
I.
"
_.~..__...:..,--..,~---L-_._~
; '" ." .
!3
~
C
~
;!;
o
N
'"
N
'"
i!!
'"
~
w
C
c
II!
ji;
'"
~
~
Z
~
~
J:
I
u
"
'"
11:
!!!
z
'"
::>
m
8
..
~
i'i
'"
"
ATTACHMENT D
February 22, 2005 Item # ~