Item 2 - TPM 04-04/VAR 04-14 - Khalid Jamil
TO:
FROM:
INITIATED BY:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
Honorable Mayor and Membe~e City Council
James L. Bowersox, City Man~
Niall Fritz, Director of Development service~
April 26, 2005
Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) 04-04 and Variance (VAR) 04-14, Khalid Jamil,
Aoolicant
ABSTRACT
A request to allow the subdivision of 2 developed residential lots into 4 residential lots (Attachment
C). The request also includes a Variance to allow a portion of the 2 existing single-family
residences to encroach into required side and rear yard setbacks. The requested Variances range
from a 2-foot front yard setback variance to a 14-foot rear yard setback Variance. The existing
homes currently do not meet the setback requirements of the zone and the subdivision will not
create new variances. This orooertv is in the Residential Sincle Familv 7 (RS-7) zone.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Environmental Initial Study was completed on the project and it was determined that the
establishment of the proposed uses of the property will not have a significant adverse impact on the
environment since potential impacts are less than a level of significance by the recommended
conditions of approval. It is recommended that a Negative Declaration be approved.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Poway News Chieftain and sent to 118 property
owners within 500 feet of the site.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map 04-04 and Variance 04-14,
subiect to the conditions in the attached orooosed Resolution.
ACTION
M:\planningI05reportltpmITPM04-04_ V AR04-14_Jamillsum .doc
1 of 39
April 26, 2005 Item # J-
CITY OF POWA Y
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
James L. Bowersox, City Man~
Niall Fritz, Director of Development Services p/
Patti Brindle, City Planner fJk'
Lisa Mercurio, Assistant Planner~
April 26, 2005
INITIATED BY:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) 04-04 and Variance (VAR) 04-14,
Khalid Jamil, Applicant: A request to allow the subdivision of
2 developed residential lots, with a combined acreage of 1.0 acres,
into 4 residential lots, which range in size from 6,633 square feet to
13,167 square feet (Attachment C). The request also includes a
Variance to allow a portion of the 2 existing single-family residences,
which are part of the proposed subdivision, to encroach into required
side and rear yard setbacks. Located in the Residential Single Family
7 (RS-7) zone.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is located at 14530-14548 Garden Road, on the north side, near
Standish Drive and Acton Drive (Attachment B). The applicants propose to subdivide the
1.0-acre property into 4 residential lots; each original lot is 0.50 acres. The minimum lot
size for the zone is 4,500 square feet, the net lot sizes of the new lots will be:
. Parcel 1 - 11,374 square feet
. Parcel 2 - 13,167 square feet
. Parcel 3 - 6,825 square feet
. Parcel 4 - 6,633 square feet
The 1.0-acre property is fairly level and gently slopes from a high point (551 feet) at the
north property line to a low point (546 feet) at the south property line, on Garden Road.
Two single-family homes have been developed on the northerly half of each lot. The
subject site has been wholly disturbed and, according to the Poway Habitat Conservation
Plan Vegetation Map, the property is mapped as developed, and no native vegetation is
shown on the site. The property is an in-fill property surrounded by existing single-family
development on all sides.
2 of 39
April 26, 2005 Item # ,...
Agenda Report
April 26, 2005
Page 2
The proposed subdivision design provides access to all four parcels off of a 28-foot-wide
easement from Garden Road that is aligned along the shared central property lines, as
shown in Attachment C. A 20-foot paved private road, with four feet of shoulder on each
side, and 20-foot paved driveways will serve each parcel. For access to developments of
more than two single-family residences a 28-foot wide access is required. The subdivision
has been designed to meet this requirement.
There are two existing single-family homes on Parcel 1 and 2. A Variance approval is also
requested because the subdivision will result in the existing residences observing less than
the required setback on both front and rear yards (Attachment E).
FINDINGS
Development Standards - The following table shows that the project complies with all of
the development standards for the General Plan and the Poway Municipal Code, with the
exception ofthe front yard and rear yard setbacks for which the approval of Variance 04-14
is sought.
Standard Parcel 1 Parcel 2 Parcel 3 Parcel 4
RS-7 zone (Developed) (Developed)
Net Lot Size 4,500 sf 11,374 sf 13,167 sf 6,825 sf 6,633 sf
Lot Width 50' 125' 133' 75' 67'
Lot Depth 80' 91' 99' 91' 99'
Ratio Lot Not more 0.7: 1 0.7: 1 1.2: 1 1.4 : 1
Depth/Width than 3:1
Front Yard 18' 9.3'(Var.req.) 14.3' 18' min. 18' min.
Setback IVar.req.\'
Interior Side 5/10' 24.9'/10' 10'/12.5' 5'/10' min 5'/10' min.
Yard Setback
Street Side 10'
Yard Setback N/A N/A 10' min. 10' min.
Rear Yard 20' 6' (Var.req.) 17.6' 20' min. 20' min.
Setback (Var. req.)
Variance 04-14 - The Variance request would allow the existing residence, on Parcel 1 , to
observe a 6-foot rear yard setback rather than the 20-foot rear yard setback that is required
and to allow them to observe a 9.3-foot front yard setback instead of the required 18-foot
front yard setback. Approximately 336 square feet of the back corner of the house will
encroach into the rear setback. This front yard setback Variance is needed due to the
requirement to increase the access easement from 20 feet to 28 feet, with 20 feet of
3 of 39
April 26, 2005 Item # J-
Agenda Report
April 26, 2005
Page 3
paving. The residence will maintain its current setback of 27 feet from the property line
and will be approximately 13.5 feet away from the paved driveway, but 9.3 feet from the
edge of the easement. Approximately 117 square feet of the existing house corner will
encroach into the front yard setback.
The Variance request also includes a request to allow the existing residence on Parcel 2 to
observe a 14.6-foot rear yard setback rather than the 20-foot rear yard setback that is
required and a 14.3 and 16-foot front yard setback instead of the required 18-foot front
yard setback. Approximately 22.5 square feet of the rear corner of the house will encroach
into the rear yard setback. The residence will maintain its current setback of 24.5 and 25.5
feet from the front property line on two corners of the existing residence. As mentioned
previously, the proposed easement width will be 28 feet, and the paved portion within the
easement will be 20 feet. Therefore, the residence on Parcel 2 will be located
approximately 18.5 feet away from the paved driveway, but 14.3 and 16 feet from the edge
of the easement. Approximately 14 square feet of the front corner of the house will
encroach into the front yard setback area.
Section 17.50 of the Poway Municipal Code requires that findings be made prior to a
Variance approval which document that special circumstances exist on the property that
make the strict application of the Zoning Code burdensome. The findings to support
Variance 04-14 are set forth in the attached proposed Resolution, and are based on the
fact there are special circumstances in that the property is constrained with two existing
single-family homes and denial of the Variance would not allow the property to be
subdivided, thereby denying the property owner a right granted to others in the vicinity and
same zoning district. The house on Parcel 1 will still maintain a 13.5-foot setback from the
paved portion of the access, so the granting of the Variance would not result in any health
or safety impacts. The existing single-family residence on Parcel 1 will maintain a 6-foot
setback from the rear property line and granting the Variance allows the property to be
subdivided and enjoy privileges that other properties in the vicinity enjoy.
The house on Parcel 2 will still maintain a minimum 18.5-foot setback from the paved
portion of the access, so the granting of the Variance would not result in any health or
safety impacts. The existing single-family residence on Parcel 2 will maintain a 14.6-foot
setback from the rear property line, and granting the Variance allows the property to be
subdivided and enjoy privileges that other properties in the vicinity enjoy. Similar Variance
requests have been approved by the City Council recently on Creek Road (Variance 04-13
- approved December 14, 2004) for setback Variances to accommodate residential
development on lots encumbered by private right-of-way or access easements.
The surrounding properties are zoned for single-family residences, and are developed with
homes and lots similar in size to those proposed with this subdivision. Therefore, the
proposed subdivisions and development of 2 additional single-family residences will match
the environment of the neighborhood.
4 of 39
April 26, 2005 Item # J-
Agenda Report
April 26, 2005
Page 4
Reauired Proiect Improvements and Easements - Subdivision of the site will require that
the following improvements be completed prior to Parcel Map approval:
. The parcel map shall be submitted to the Development Seryices Department,
Engineering Division, for review and approval, together with the supporting data and
documentation, and applicable map checking fees.
. Easements and/or right-of-way dedications to the City within the limits of the parcel
map shall be made on the map.
. Off-site easements to be dedicated by separate instrument shall be recorded prior
to parcel map approval.
· Existing overhead utility seryice, as well as new utilities, on the site must be
undergrounded.
. Install a new fire hydrant along the project access road/driveway to the satisfaction
of the Fire Marshal. Dedicate an easement to the City over the water line that will
serye the fire hydrant.
. Extend City water and sewer to each of the new lots. Sewer lines will be required to
obserye a minimum 10-foot separation from any water lines.
. Provide a private access and utility easement for Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4.
. No improvements will be needed to Garden Road.
Tree Removal- The subject site contains a variety of mature trees, such as palm, cypress
and fruit. Future development of the lots may necessitate the removal of some of the
trees. A condition of approval for the project requires that, prior to grading or Minor
Development Review Application (MORA) approval, the applicant will complete a tree
inventory and be required to retain as many existing mature trees as possible. There are
no native or heritage trees on the site. The purpose of the inventory is to provide a record
of the type and size of on-site trees, and allow preservation of any mature trees that may
exist on the site, pursuant to the City's Urban Forestry Ordinance.
Desianated Front Property Lines - The subdivision map will designate the front property
lines of all four parcels as along the westerly or easterly property line of each lot
(Attachment F). Parcels 1 and 3 front property lines will be their easterly property line,
which is adjacent to the access easement. Parcels 2 and 4 front property lines will be their
westerly property line, which is adjacent to the access easement. The front lot line
designations for all of the parcels are consistent with the Zoning Code criteria for identifying
a front lot line.
5 of 39
April 26, 2005 Item # J-
Agenda Report
April 26, 2005
Page 5
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Environmental Initial Study was completed on the project and it was determined that the
establishment of the proposed uses of the property will not have a significant adverse
impact on the environment since potential impacts are less than a level of significance by
the recommended conditions of approval. It is recommended that a Negative Declaration
be approved.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Poway News Chieftain and sent to 118
property owners within 500 feet of the site.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map 04-04 and Variance
04-14, subject to the conditions in the attached proposed Resolution.
Attachments:
A. Proposed Resolution
B. Land Use and Location Map
C. Tentative Parcel Map 04-02
D. Negative Declaration and Environmental Initial Study
E. Site Plan Detailing Variance Setback
F. Designated Front Lot Lines
M :\planning\05report~pm\TPM04-04_ V AR04-14_Jamillagenda.doc
6 of 39
April 26, 2005 Item # C)....
RESOLUTION NO. P-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM) 04-04 AND VARIANCE 04-14
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 323-032-30 and 33
WHEREAS, a request for a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 04-04) was submitted by
Khalid Jamil to subdivide 2 lots, with a combined acreage of 1.0 acres, into 4 residential
lots, which range in size from 6,633 square feet to 13,167 square feet. The request also
includes a Variance (VAR 04-14) to allow portions of the two existing residences, which
are part of the proposed subdivision, to remain and encroach into the required side and
rear yard setbacks; and
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2005, the City Council held a public hearing on the
above-referenced item; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has read and considered the agenda report for the
proposed project and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Poway
as follows:
Section 1: An Environmental Initial Study was completed on the project and it was
determined that the establishment of the proposed uses of the property will not have a
significant adverse impact on the environment since potential impacts are less than a
level of significance by the recommended conditions of approval. It is recommended
that a Negative Declaration be approved.
Section 2: The findings, in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act
(Government Code Section 66410 et. seq.) for Tentative Parcel Map 04-04, are made
as follows:
A. The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan in that it proposes
to create 4 residential parcels at densities consistent with the General Plan and
Poway Municipal Code designations.
B. The design and improvements required of the Tentative Parcel Map are
consistent with all applicable general and specific plans in that the approved lot
sizes and configurations adhere to the development standards of the General
Plan and Poway Municipal Code.
C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development and the density
proposed, in that the site is large enough to provide 4 lots of regular shape and
dimension and has access to a public street, Garden Road.
7 of 39
ATTACHMENT A
April 26, 2005 Item # )...
Resolution No. P-
Page 2
D. The design of the Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their
habitat, in that the project is an in-fill project on a previously disturbed property.
E. The approval is not likely to cause serious public health problems, in that City
water and sewer service are available to the site.
F. The design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict with any easement by the
public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the
subdivision, in that the development of single-family residences on the proposed
lots can be accommodated without obstructing or otherwise impacting existing
easements.
Section 3: The findings, in accordance with Section 17.50.050 of the Poway Municipal
Code, to approve Variance 04-14 to allow Parcel 1 to observe a 6-foot rear yard setback
rather than the required 20-foot setback, and observe a 9.3 foot front yard setback
rather than the required 18 foot setback as shown on the Tentative Map dated
December 23,2004, and allow Parcel 2 to observe a 14.58 foot rear yard setback rather
than the required 20 foot setback, and observe a 14.31 and 16 foot front yard setback
rather than the required 18 foot setback as shown on Tentative Map dated December
23, 2004, and on file in the Planning Division office are made as follows:
A. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property in that:
On Parcel 1 - There is an existing single-family home on the property that
constrains the location of the access easement and the strict application of the
Zoning Code street yard setback for the house would deprive the property of
privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and same zone. The existing
single-family residence also encroaches into the rear yard setback and they are
unable to meet the required setbacks.
On Parcel 2 - There is an existing single-family home on the property that
constrains the location of the access easement and the strict application of the
Zoning Code street yard setback for the house would deprive the property of
privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and same zone. The
existing single-family residence also encroaches into the rear yard setback and
they are unable to meet the required setbacks.
B.
Granting the Variance is necessary for the preseryation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right enjoyed by other property owners in the same vicinity
and not afforded to the property for which the Variance is sought because the
other lots in the Garden Road area have been allowed to subdivide in
accordance with the Poway Municipal Code.
8 of 39
April 26, 2005 Item # "-
Resolution No. P-
Page 3
On Parcel 1 - The granting of the Variance allows the property owner to
subdivide as others in the vicinity are able to do, while legalizing an existing non-
conforming rear yard setback.
On Parcel 2 - The granting of the Variance allows the property owner to
subdivide the property, as other owners in the vicinity are able to do, and also to
legalize an existing non-conforming rear yard setback.
C. Granting the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare in the vicinity in that:
On Parcel 1 - The proposed subdivision has been designed to comply with other
adopted subdivision standards, and there will be a minimum 13.5-foot separation
between the residence and the future proposed paved portion of the driveway to
the existing residence. The granting of the rear yard setback variance will not be
detrimental because it will be located in the rear of the property and is not visible
from a public street.
On Parcel 2 - The proposed subdivision has been designed to comply with other
adopted subdivision standards, and there will be a minimum of 18.5 feet from the
paved portion of the driveway to the existing residence. The granting of the rear
yard setback variance is not detrimental because it will be located in the rear of
the property and is not visible from a public street.
D. Granting the Variance does not constitute a special privilege that is inconsistent
with the limitation upon other properties in the vicinity and zone because the
Variance will allow the subdivision of property that is consistent with City Codes
and other subdivisions that have been approved in the vicinity and zone.
E. Granting the Variance would not allow a use not otherwise expressly authorized
by the RS-7 zone because single-family homes are a permitted use.
F. Granting the Variance will be compatible with the City's General Plan because
the use is permitted and does not result in a density increase.
Section 4: The findings in accordance with Government Code Section 66020 for the
public improvements are made as follows:
A.
The design and improvements of the proposed development are consistent with
all elements of the Poway General Plan, as well as City Ordinances, because all
necessary services and facilities will be available to serve the project. The
construction of public improvements is needed as a result of the proposed
development to protect the public health, safety and welfare as identified below:
9 of 39
April 26, 2005 Item # :;..
Resolution No. P-
Page 4
1. Private access roadway improvements will be constructed to
accommodate the project traffic impacts.
2. On-site drainage improvements will be constructed to handle the surface
water runoff.
3. A fire hydrant will be constructed to serve the development and provide
fire protection.
4. Water and sewer fees will be paid. On-site and off-site improvements will
be made to provide water and sewer service to the development.
5. Access to the site will be provided in accordance with City standards and
to ensure adequate emergency access.
Section 5: The City Council hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map 04-04 and Variance
04-14, to allow the subdivision of 1.0 acres of land into 4 residential lots, located at
14530-14548 Garden Road, in the Residential Single-Family 7 (RS-7) zone, and the
existing residences on Parcels 1 and 2 to encroach into the required front and rear yard
setbacks, as shown on the Tentative Parcel Map dated December 23, 2004, subject to
the following conditions:
A. This approval is not inclusive of the design of the proposed single-family homes.
Separate approval of the home design and footprints shall be applied for through
the Development ReviewlMinor Development Review Application process prior to
issuance of Building Permits.
B. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of
Building Permit issuance.
C. The developer is required to comply with the Poway Noise Ordinance
requirements that govern construction activity and noise levels.
D. Prior to Parcel Map approval, unless other timing is indicated, the following
conditions shall be complied with.
1. Within 30 days after City Council approval of the Tentative Parcel Map,
the applicant shall submit in writing to the City that all conditions of
approval have been read and understood.
(Engineering)
2. Within 30 days after City Council approval of the Tentative Parcel Map,
the subdivider shall make a reservation for a sewer Letter of Availability for
two Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU) and pay the City a non-refundable
10 of 39
April 26, 2005 Item # '-
4.
11 of 39
Resolution No. P-
Page 5
sewer connection fee of $942.40. This amount represents twenty percent
(20%) of the sewage connection fee.
3.
Within 30 days after City Council approval of the Tentative Parcel Map,
the subdivider shall pay the City an additional 30% sewer connection fee
of $1,413.60. The remaining balance of the sewer connection fee, in the
amount of $2,356, shall be paid prior to Building Permit issuance.
This approval is based on the existing site conditions represented on the
Tentative Parcel Map. If actual conditions vary from representations, the
approved Tentative Parcel Map must be changed to reflect actual
conditions. Any substantial changes to the Tentative Parcel Map must be
approved by the Director of Development Seryices and may require
approval of the City Council.
5.
Submittal of a Parcel Map to the City for review and approval. The Parcel
Map shall conform to City standards and procedures, the City Subdivision
Ordinance, the Subdivision Map Act, the Land Surveyors Act, the
Resolution of Approval as approved by the City Council and shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved Tentative Parcel Map.
Appropriate map review fees shall be paid at time of submittal.
6.
A private road and utility easement shall be created for parcels 1, 2, 3 and
4.
7.
Show easements on map described in South Coast Title Company Report
Order No. 83869-23, Schedule B, Items D2, 04 and 05. The easements
shall show the County recordation number and date of recordation.
8.
Post a cash deposit to the City, an amount equivalent to $100.00 per
sheet of the Parcel Map, for the photo mylar reproduction of the recorded
parcel map. If applicant/developer provides the City with the photo mylar
copy of the recorded Parcel Map within 3 months from recordation or prior
to Building Permit issuance to Parcel 1, whichever comes first, said cash
deposit shall thereafter be refunded to the depositor; otherwise it shall be
used by the City to pay for the reproduction of a photo mylar copy.
9.
Easements andlor right-of-way dedications to the City within the limits of
the subdivision shall be made on the final Parcel Map. Water and sewer
mains and their appurtenances to be installed at locations other than
within public streets shall have an easement, a minimum of 20 feet wide
for each line, dedicated to the City.
10.
A monumentation bond in an amount acceptable to the City Engineer shall
be posted.
April 26, 2005 Item # ~
Resolution No. P-
Page 6
11. The City Engineer shall approve a Private Maintenance Agreement
between all the parcel owners to maintain the private road.
E. Prior to a Grading Permit, the applicant shall complete to the satisfaction of the
Director of Development Seryices:
(Planning)
1. A Master Tree Inventory shall be prepared on the property by a qualified
arborist or biologist. The species and diameter of the trunk shall be
indicated. The inventory shall be submitted to the Planning Division and
shall be used to identify any sensitive or mature tree(s) that will need to be
preserved.
(Engineering)
2. A grading plan is required for development of the lots, and shall be
prepared on mylar at a scale of 1"=20', and submitted to the Development
Services Department - Engineering Division for review and approval. As a
minimum, the grading plan shall show the following:
12 of 39
a.
All new slopes with a maximum 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) slope.
Tops and toes of graded slopes shall be shown with a minimum
five-foot setback from open space areas and property lines.
Buildings shall be located at least five feet from tops and toes of
slopes, unless waived by the Planning Division and/or Engineering
Division prior to issuance of a Grading Permit.
b.
Driveways, in compliance with the specifications provided in
Section 17.08.1700 of the Poway Municipal Code, and including
minimum structural sections together with their elevations and
grades.
c.
A separate erosion control plan for prevention of sediment runoff
during construction.
d.
A certificate signed by a registered civil engineer that the grading
plan has preserved a minimum of 100 square feet of solar access
for each dwelling unit and for each future building site within the
subdivision.
e.
All utilities (proposed and existing), together with their
appurtenances and associated easements. Encroachments are not
permitted upon any easement without an approved Encroachment
Removal Agreement.
April 26, 2005, Item # f)
Resolution No. P-
Page 7
f. Locations of all utility boxes, clearly identified in coordination with
the respective utility companies, and approved by the City prior to
any installation work. Any utility improvements that are greater
than 36 inches in height will be required to be screened by
landscaping.
3. Grading of the project shall be in substantial conformance with the
approved development plan and in accordance with the Uniform Building
Code, City Grading Ordinance, City Storm Water Management and
Discharge Control Ordinance, and Drainage and Watercourses
Ordinance.
4. Pad elevations shown on the grading plan shall not increase by more than
two feet in height from the elevations shown on the approved tentative
Parcel Map, unless otherwise approved by the City Council.
5. A soils/geological report shall be prepared by an engineer licensed by the
State of California to perform such work, and shall be submitted with the
grading plan.
6. A drainage study using the 1 DO-year storm frequency criteria shall be
submitted with the grading plan. The drainage system shall be capable of
handling and disposing all surface water within the subdivision and all
surface water flowing onto the subdivision from adjacent lands. Said
system shall include all easements required to properly handle the
drainage. Concentrated flows across driveways are not permitted.
7. If grading of this project is to disturb one acre or more, the property owner
shall file with the State Regional Water Quality Control Board a Notice of
Intent (NOI) of coverage under the statewide General Permit that covers
storm water discharges. Proof of filing of the NOI and an assigned Waste
Discharge Identification Number shall be submitted to the Development
Seryices Department - Engineering Division prior to issuance of a Grading
or Building Permit. Applications may be obtained by contacting:
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
San Diego Region
9174 Sky Park Court, Suite 100
San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 467-2952
8.
If grading of this project is to disturb one acre or more, the property owner
shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that
effectively addresses the elimination of non-storm runoff into the storm
drain system. The SWPPP shall include, but not be limited to, an effective
method of hillside erosion and sediment control; a de-silting basin with a
13 of 39
April 26, 2005 Item # ~
Resolution No. P-
Page 8
capacity of 3,600 cubic feet of storage per acre drained, or designed to
remove fine silt for a 10-year, 6-hour storm event; a material storage site;
measures to protect construction material from being exposed to storm
water control; and other means of Best Management Practices to
effectively eliminate pollutants from entering the storm drain system. The
engineer shall certify the SWPPP prior to issuance of the Grading Permit.
9. Erosion control, including, but not limited to, desiltation basins, shall be
installed and maintained from throughout construction of the project. An
erosion control plan shall be prepared by the project civil engineer and
shall be submitted as part of the grading plan. The applicant/developer
shall make provisions to insure proper maintenance of all erosion control
devices.
10. Grading securities in the form of a performance bond and cash deposit, or
a letter of credit shall be posted with the City.
11. A Right-of-Way Permit shall be obtained from the Development Services
Department - Engineering Division for any work to be done in public street
rights-of-way or City-held easements.
12. The applicant/developer shall pay the following fees and post or pay the
grading securities:
a. Grading Permit, plan checking, inspection, Right-of-Way Permit,
and geotechnical review fees. The Grading Permit fee shall be
paid at first submittal of grading plans.
a. The driveway construction cost shall be included in the cost
estimates for plan checking and determination of inspection fees.
c. Posting and/or payment of grading securities. A $2,000 erosion
control cash security for each lot shall be posted with the City.
13. Submittal of a request for and then subsequently hold a pre-construction
meeting with a City Engineering Inspector. The applicant/developer shall
be responsible that necessary individuals, such as, but not limited to,
contractors, subcontractors, project civil engineer and project soils
engineer must attend the preconstruction meeting. At the pre-construction
meeting, the applicant shall present an Action Plan that identifies
measures to be implemented during construction to address erosion,
sediment, and pollutant control. Compliance for erosion control can be
provided using one or more of the following guidelines.
a.
Provide an on-site desiltation basin with a volume based on 3,600
cubic feet per tributary acre drained during grading operations.
14 of 39
April 26, 2005 Item # f)...
Resolution No. P-
Page 9
b. Cover all flat areas with approved mulch.
c. Install an earthen or gravel bag berm that retains 3 inches of water
over all areas prior to discharge, effectively creating a desiltation
basin from the pad.
14. Construction staking is to be inspected by the Engineering Inspector prior
to any clearing, grubbing or grading. As a minimum, all protected areas
as shown on the project plans are to be staked by a licensed surveyor and
delineated with lathe and ribbon. A written certification from the engineer
of work or a licensed surveyor shall be provided to the Engineering
Inspector stating that all protected areas are staked in accordance with the
approved project plans.
15. The drainage from each parcel shall not encroach on any other parcel or
neighboring properties unless a City Engineer approved drainage system
is designed.
16. The design of the private road shall be shown on the grading plan and
include the following:
a. Compliance with the specifications for private roads provided in
Title 12 of the Poway Municipal Code, including minimum structural
sections together with its elevations and grades.
b. The private road profile.
c. The private road intersection with Garden Road shall be designed
to include handicap accessibility ramps on both sides in
accordance with the latest Americans with Disability Act Standards.
d. The fire apparatus turnaround shall meet the approval of the Poway
Fire Department.
17. All on-site and off-site project grading may be required to be conducted
outside the rainy season.
G. Prior to Building Permit issuance the applicant shall comply with the following:
(Engineering)
1. The final Parcel Map for TPM 04-04 shall be approved and recorded in the
office of the San Diego County Recorder and a mylar copy of the recorded
map shall be provided to the City.
15 of 39
April 26, 2005, Item # :;...
Resolution No. P-
Page 10
2. The site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on
file in the Development Seryices Department and the conditions contained
herein. Grading of lots shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building
Code, the City Grading Ordinance, the approved grading plan, the
approved soils report, and grading practices acceptable to the City.
3. Non-supervised or non-engineered fill is not allowed. Rock disposal areas
shall be graded in compliance with City approved soils recommendations
and the approved grading plans.
4. If rock blasting is needed, prior to rock blasting, a pre-blast survey of the
surrounding properties shall be conducted to the satisfaction of the
Director of Development Seryices, and a Blasting Permit shall be obtained
from the Engineering Division. Seismic recordings shall be taken for all
blasting. Blasting shall occur only at locations and levels approved by the
Director of Development Seryices.
5. Rough grading of the lots is to be completed and meet the approval of the
City Inspector and shall include submittal of the following:
a. A certification of line and grade for each lot prepared by the
engineer of work.
b. A final soil compaction report for each lot for review and approval
by the City.
6. Parcel 3 and Parcel 4 shall have their own water line and sewer lateral
contained within the shared driveway to serve each respective parcel.
These lines shall be privately maintained.
7. Prior to delivery of combustible building materials, on-site water and sewer
systems shall satisfactorily pass all required tests.
8. Installation of fire hydrants at locations determined by the City Fire
Marshal. A water analysis may be required to analyze the fire hydrants
adequacy to City's standards for fire flow and pressure. Any additional
improvement recommendation made in the analysis shall be constructed.
Payment for preparation of the analysis shall be paid to the City upon
demand.
9. The City may require an improvement plan to be prepared, of which plan
checking and inspection fees shall be paid.
10. Payment of development fees to the City, unless other payee is indicated.
The fees and the corresponding amounts are as follows and are subject to
change without further notice. The amounts to be paid shall be those in
16 of 39
April 26, 2005 Item #
:J-
Resolution No. P-
Page 11
effect at time of payment. If a 1" meter is required only as a result of fire
sprinklers, the Yo" base capacity and SDCWA fees will be applicable.
Water base capacity fee (Resolution No. 91-123)
For %" meter = $3,710.00 per meter
For 1" meter = $6,678.00 per meter
Other meter sizes = Contact Engineering Division
Water meter fee (Resolution No. 91-123)
For %" meter = $ 130.00 per meter
For 1" meter = $ 140.00 per meter
Other meter sizes = Contact Engineering Division
SDCWA capacity charge - To be paid by separate check, payable to San
Diego County Water Authority.
For Yo" meter = $2,461.00 per meter
For 1" meter = $3,938.00 per meter
Other meter sizes = Contact Engineering Division
Sewer connection fee = $2,356.00 (Represents 50% payment,
assuming that 20% payment was made at reseryation of sewer LOA and
30% payment made within 30 days after map approval)
Sewer cleanout fee = $50.00 per cleanout
Sewer cleanout inspection fee = $25.00 per cleanout
Traffic mitigation fee
= $1,320.00'"
... 2 parcels (Parcels 3 & 4) @ $660.00
Drainage fee
= $2,400.00
Drainage fee = $1,200.00 x 2 lots = $2,400.00
Park fee
= $5,440.00
Park fee = $2,720.00 x 2 lots = $5,440.00
H. Prior to occupancy, the applicant shall comply with the following fire safety
requirements to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal:
1.
A fire hydrant shall be located on Garden Road in the vicinity of the
access way, to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal.
17 of 39
April 26, 2005 Item # ~
Resolution No. P-
Page 12
I. Compliance with the following conditions is required prior to issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy:
(Engineering)
1. Driveways, drainage facilities, slope landscaping and protection
measures, and utilities shall be constructed, completed, and inspected by
the Engineering Inspector. The driveway shall be constructed in
accordance with Poway Municipal Code, Section 17.08.1700, and its
structural section shall be shown on the grading plan.
2. All existing and new utilities within the project shall be placed
underground, to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Seryices.
3. An adequate drainage system around each building pad capable of
handling and disposing all surface water shall be provided to the
satisfaction of the Engineering Inspector.
4. Record drawings for grading plans, signed by the engineer of work, shall
be submitted to Development Services prior to a request of occupancy,
per Section 16.52.130B of the Grading Ordinance. Record drawings shall
be submitted in a manner to allow the City adequate time for review and
approval prior to issuance of occupancy and release of grading securities.
A copy of the approved record drawings on a disk in AutoCad format shall
be provided to the City.
5. The subdivider shall repair, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, any
and all damages to public road improvements caused by construction
activity from this project.
Section 6: The approval of Tentative Parcel Map 04-04 and Variance 04-14 expires
on April 5, 2007, at 5:00 p.m. The Parcel Map conforming to this conditionally approved
Tentative Parcel Map shall be filed with the City so that the City may approve the Parcel
Map before this approval expires, unless at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the
Tentative Parcel Map a request for a time extension is submitted to the Development
Services Department and a time extension is subsequently granted by the City Council.
Section 7: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, the 90-day approval period
in which the applicant may protest the imposition of any fees, dedications, reseryations,
or exactions imposed pursuant to this approval shall begin on April 26, 2005.
18 of 39
April 26, 2005 Item # ;-
Resolution No. P-
Page 13
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Poway,
State of California, at a regular meeting this 26th day of April 2005.
Michael P. Cafagna, Mayor
ATTEST:
L. Diane Shea, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)SS.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
I, L. Diane Shea, City Clerk of the City of Poway, do hereby certify, under penalty
of perjury, that the foregoing Resolution No. P- was duly adopted by the City
Council at a meeting of said City Council held on the 26th day of April 2005 and that it
was so adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED
L. Diane Shea, City Clerk
City of Poway
M:\planning\05report\tpm\TPM04-04_ VAR04~ 14_Jamil\reso.doc
19 of 39
April 26, 2005 Item # :J-.
~
r
~ ~ "" \ t; ~
~~ R R-A ''', \: (f)
\ r (E _w"';; n:::
"J:2, J - == ) III'>. ~,:s OS-RM
" 'l--~ -J;!; -, \ \ L . " ...J
:rIP~ r' . __ ~ ~ =~ _~ ~ --
]= f-b: '--;,;;;~--'-i A .+- I~ =~ ~~
"-= Li.."..-;t -~ ~
- [-:::': _. -..'" I c::; -::;; 1-_ (-1--
- t:Q: ~ '\ .. P ~ ~ =i; =::: t=~<1 I-l-' _
- h::i: p:::.. "- -1,= -- ~l-
- r--'5 , "" f-I- _.~ '-,- -
l::l . IE 8 /~ ~ '- ~ t:.~ = {;;; -"- -
~ LU -~ S / "'\' F ~ir~flIO-qJrnTm r=t:- _
: IL -1':11;~1~''" '.~..~W~~l-ll =~ ~
'> ri I .'-'., I=----/) )~ rL~ ~E. -r--
" > c-f-l r '1 ~ y1f: ~.,,; -- ~ I 1---1- r-r-- r-
\0... Wy r- =t= ~ - 1 l-.'1 ~J~ -"", (;Lf'l $' "-, f-.. jjr- J
_ -- U '-1-- = . " ~ t:ll I I r--, r--'= ~ ,111111-<11-11
OC~ .,+- L i,;(L{;g """" .. 17 -. I;:?__ ::;
I ~ '5 : 2= -' I '''JI(.jV~ IF lei' -\ I_!. _L-=l ~=,:;. I
7 ~ ~ ~t;:: ~UBJ~T SITE"" - 1 i~:~ --.-- _I r:: ~ i- Gr~[!'j
/ . ~~ _~ U.L ~ LL r:: ={ --s -- t:: :s: FfU"AIT
'-_ ._C~ ::::IiiH';.l ~ L t-ti' 7 - 3;:'~ 4rl Dr TJH~ d- ELEM.
I ~ ~ G ~ -) ~-I I I I p~ttTFFVl -. '1-!
- H ~ 1//-1'-1.3/::: ~1llls' _I I _ I
__.I ;~,':;t/hIi ~I--.j ~::~ rrm:TTTTll ~ 1 Ltf\N1Nt1 IRqE
':j ~ M 1< ~ '=-t;1 r:: r::- [J?~j\J,g]ll]] -- 2 R eLL I N 1~ G L EJ~
W = I- I- I- Cl-~"T I-- ~
__J""- - = ~ \ ~ . "-!_ (:rh k -3 RED. C.J.L . LID L
I M.y--.J ^)' ,( ".. -'- "= I
.-J 1\ ,--"v - //, /'/7'-1' I ,4 MI:::lWI IGi' l~r'FN.
,v .. "J' ,':>. / I" ,! ! I .~ _ ' ! ,.\
~ ~j! i: ~, vv
\ 7if,~' ~..j irIT'I'8'1TT~ ~ 5 G..;E. M CT I
y ,Q:j "'crf' 'Ii '" ':F\~ ." --1 r , I
- ! , ' c; L:l~!U!:1.GL 1 f:' 6 F ()f)T DI HI\~!\!\I
~ ;:;.'75'--:.1T~~fM':') ,~j,:,rt'\, "TT1TJili' '-'Inn :a '1" r.'-/\ !.v'-1"I."," ,--"',:::,-
~.1J}Jl_1:-,!'!"{7ttCr!", ,li'w_IL'~i)rli i -- ---- .'l [Jr-"
..j l=lJI i T;;f~ ;~ ,.~ . :;':;",~_'i;,
)
,
-
~~ \....
t'!..h ~ r.-7
1'" 'v
" ~~-
\~~
~
-
---
-,
----
-
-,
-
U::::
o
L.d
CITY OF POWAY
ITEM: TPM 04-04/VAR 04-14
SCALE: NTS, 9
TITLE: ZONING/LOCATION MAP
20 of 39
ATTACHMENT B
April 26, 2005 Item # 2..
a..~
<(
~
...J
W
U
0::
~
w
>
!;(
I-
Z
W
I-~
I~~ ,l'
",i! .r
i W~l
~ al!j'
iii i'll,
i "f;!
~Jpl
iIi1j
~ ~h~i
filiI,
=~nh
.~ @~I:'l5~g!i
! ~~!l~ia:~
] ~ha~58i5~b
- '~~.i';\:!~l
~ Eliilb _/SI"'ilio.i3
, ;'.I~~~:"
, .~~l"'i,.l
'to o-lI;Ill!i!;~": "'lo{~
! ".,,"!!~':
, .og.....,.
'0 if ~~",~~~F~.~
~.!! l:$...."";!O~I~~
~! 8o..b~<L'" '.0 ~
~~ ~~~~3ii!'ih",
:: ~ ~~h:ll~~"'fls.:!:I.
~g. "'''''- ~""~ijI"'"
-,:II ;;t5l'!lii~~~~~~
-" ~~<!~"'"
l~~.~~",!.
I
II
.,
n
U
-.
~l'
. .
. .Ii
s: = ~~
~ ~~l
~ ,h
~ ;,-
n~
HI
,
Ii"
I ! II
i I oj
. , I.
,- .
l! !' · H
,~ ,! ! t:
$( ~ ~ .!I,l
fI' ,
t! > ~ i i i~
~ " I ! Il~ ..
;: ~<> 8" ""
i '" l I,' ,I
l( ~.. R ~
'Gi ~ ~ t ..~. J!l
~ ~K j ~ ~ ! Ih
I).... 01 ~;::' hl
;i g
1 '". 1::
Q ~~ i
~ ~! *
. ~
I l
II II
I ,I
---'+011
~:<( ,I
Cl
w
>
w
()
UJ
0:
III
.... ()
~ ~~
c-J ;s::W
0(1)
0..1-
u..Z
o~
~o..
-9
Ow
>
UJ
Cl
~
't
~
~.
l
~
, . , , l!j,lN
. . - . - ~ ~
" ~ I . ,1 , , "
~ ~ . . . ;< ~
, . . , ~ , ~ T ~ ~ . , z z z
~ . , ~ , ~ ~ ~ . g i ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~;
" , ~ ~8 . . - ~F
I i ; . ! , ~ ~ i~ ~ , , ",:0 !:i
~ ,,~ E ~ ~ ~ 8~ m.
.5 a~ , , , w .
, , f-...J:i
Ci ~<< II
z ~u
W " , "'0: 0J
l.ex ~r
lfl I . 0 . ~ 0
. 0 C 0 I ., .. Oowu. .c I
..J
~
~
,,- - , n
21 of 39
~ i"~
Cl ""g
:::::; l5
~ "'~
'"
~ E ~
~! t.
~ ; ~
. .
~ 1':
:ii i l'j 1'i l5
i...~<'<-'
... 00 1lIj;i ~
olI ~ ~ ~lli 01,
1;1111...,. ~ >j~:
g '.0'"
... fE"'~'1"'l;:!
I
U
<l:
_._.m.~__
rOi\o
~L[)
o
I
,
--+-J---
, li..9
i ,i:P,
i <:"1'0
II "0'('
! 1'0'1>-
~ i
0'" 1
~,~
(~
~
i
1
,
..:~
5~
~~
<
~ ~i
" ~~
=
. ;~~
Q ;
1
~j ~)
,
, -
'j
'0 <;
I ~
" ,
i !
,
}
..
!
h
tj
"
!i
ro 1
^
.. "'"'
I
,
'cr-
I
;
iz
I
!W
10
Icr-
l<r
,
b
I
---1-
i
,
,
J
I
@
L-
,
>'('
'c,
('0.
('
'"
.j,"'p.
--
,
,
,
;
[
'~i
i' /( ~
,I '"
I
I)
d
I
."
3N\il anOl::1 a3l:l
..,,-..,
u~~
cr.
N
W
LJ.l
Cl
1 J
N01JV
(0,
G"'r""
~
d~
~'"
<0
~,,~
~)"Oj.
<',
8"'"
'r
CXJ '"
Iii
ib
"
>
(:::!\'<
Q1o-~
0,'.9
~
8'"
ATTACHMENT C
April 26, 2005 Item # :J-
MICKEY CAFAGNA, Mayor
BOB EMERY, Deputy Mayor
MERRILEE BOYACK, Councilmember
DON HIGGINSON, Councilmember
BETrY REXFORD, Councilmember
CITY OF POWAY
CITY OF POWAY
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
1. Name and Address of Applicant: Khalid Jamil
9367 Veryain Street
San Diego. CA 92129
Proiect Name and Brief Description of Proiect: Environmental Assessment and
Tentative Parcel Map 04-04: A request to allow the subdivision of
2 developed residential lots, with a combined acreage of 1.0 acres, into 4 residential
lots, which range in size from 6,633 square feet to 13,167 square feet (Attachment C).
The request also includes a Variance to allow a portion of the 2 existing single-family
residences, which are part of the proposed subdivision, to encroach into required side
and rear yard setbacks.
2. In accordance with Resolution 83-084 of the City of Poway, implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, the City of Poway City Council has found
that the above project will not have a significant effect upon the environment and has
approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration. An Environmental Impact Report will not
be required.
3. This Mitigated Negative Declaration is comprised of this form along with the
Environmental Initial Study that includes the Initial Study and Checklist and the
approved Mitigation Monitoring Program containing the mitigation measures approved
for this project.
4. The decision of the City Council of the City of Poway is final.
Contact Person: Lisa Mercurio
Phone: (858) 668-4662
Approved by: Date: April 26. 2005
Niall Fritz, Director of Development Services
Attachment:
Environmental Initial Study
M:\planningI05reportltpmITPM04-04_ VAR04-14_Jam inneg dec form.doc
22 of 39
City Hal
Address: P.O. Bo
::::enter Dr
ATTACHMENT D 12074-078 April 26, 2005 Item #
~ Printed on Recycled Paper
CITY OF POWAY
ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY
AND CHECKLIST
A. INTRODUCTION
This Environmental Initial Study and Checklist, along with information contained in the public record,
comprise the environmental documentation for the proposed project as described below pursuant to
the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based upon the information
contained herein and in the public record, the City of Poway has prepared a Negative Declaration for
the proposed project.
B. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. Project Title: Tentative Parcel MaD 04-04/Khalid Jamil
2. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Powav
13325 Civic Center Drive, Powav, CA 92064
3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Lisa Mercurio, Assistant Planner (858) 668-4662
4. Project Location: 14530-14548 Garden Road, City of Powav, County of San Dieqo
5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Khalid Jamil, 9367 Vervain St.. San Dieqo, CA 92129
6. General Plan Designation: Residential and Zoning: Residential Sino Ie Familv 7
7. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including by not limited to later
phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or offsite features necessary for its
implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary).
A proposal to allow the subdivision of 2 lots, with a combined acreaoe of 1.0 acres, into 4 lots,
which ranqe in size from 6.633 square feet to 13,167 square feet. The request also includes a
Variance to allow a portion of 2 existinq sinqle familv residences, which are part of the
proposed subdivision to encroach into the re~uired side and rear yard setbacks. The subiect
property is located at 14530-14548 Garden Road within the Residential Sinqle Familv 7 zone.
8. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The subiect proDertv is located in an area that consists of
sinqle-familv development on similar lot sizes.
9. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g. permits, financing approval, or participation
agreement): None.
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would
be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant
Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
23 of 39
1
April 26, 2005 Item # ~
EIS and Checklist
TPM 04-05
o Land Use and Planning 0 TransportationlCirculation 0 Public Services
o Population and Housing 0 Biological Resources 0 Utilities and Service
o Geological Problems 0 Energy and Mineral Systems
o Water Resources 0 Aesthetics
o Air Quality 0 HazardslHazardous Materials 0 Cultural Resources
o Agricultural Resources D Noise D Recreation
D Mandatory Findings of
Significance
Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency):
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and [gJ
a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, D
there will not be a significant effect in this case revisions in the project have been made by or
agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an 0
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT are required.
I find that the proposed MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant D
unless mitigated" impact on the environment but at least one effect 1) has been adequately
analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards. And 2) has been
addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached
sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the
effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, D
because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
or NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided
or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
"
'- '~tA- VYl QA ~
'..J City of Poway
It 10/05
Date
C. Checklist
24 of 39
2
April 26, 2005 Item # :-
EIS and Checklist
TPM 04-05
ISSUE POTENTIALLY POTENTIALLY LESS THAN NO
SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
IMPACT UNLESS IMPACT
MITIGATION
INCORPORATION
I. AESTHETICS. Would the proiect: X
a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic X
hiahwav?
b. Have a demonstrable negative X
aesthetic effect?
c. Create iiOht oralare? X
II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. X
In determining whether impacts to
agricultural resources are
significant environmental effects,
leao agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land
Evaluation and Site Assessment
Model (1997) prepared by the
California Department of
Conservation as an optional
model to use in assessing impacts
on agriculture and farmland.
Would the proiect:
a. Convert prime farmland, unique X
farmland, or farmland of statewide
importance (farmland), as shown
on the maps prepared pursuant to
the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to
non-aaricultural use?
b. Conflict with existing zoning for X
agricultural use, or a Williamson
Act contract?
c. Involve other changes in the X
existing environment which, due
to their location or nature, could
result in conversion of farmland to
non-aaricultural use.
III. AIR QUALITY. Where available,
the significance criteria
established by the applicable air
quality management or air
pollution control district may be
relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the
oroiect:
a. Conflict with or obstruct X
implementation of the applicable
air nualitv nlan?
25 of 39
3
April 26, 2005 Item # ~
EIS and Checklist
TPM 04-05
ISSUE POTENTIALLY POTENTIALLY LESS THAN NO
SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
IMPACT UNLESS IMPACT
MITIGATION
INCORPORATION
b. Violate any air quality standard X
or contribute substantially to an
existing or projected air quality
violation?
c. Expose sensitive receptors to X
substantial pollutant
concentrations?
d. Create objectionable odors X
affecting a substantial number of
oeoole?
IV.B/0t0(3ICAL RESOURCES:
Would the oroiect:
a. Have a substantial adverse X
effect, either directly or through
habitat modifications, on any
species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations, or
by the California Department of
Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
b. Have a substantial adverse X
effect on any riparian habitat or
other sensitive natural
community identified in local or
regional plans, policies,
regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c. Have a substantial adverse effect X
on federally protected wetlands
as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including, but
not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filing, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d. Interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident X
or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native
resident migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
26 of 39
4
April 26, 2005 Item # ;..
EIS and Checklist
TPM 04-05
ISSUE POTENTIALLY POTENTIALLY LESS THAN NO
SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
IMPACT UNLESS IMPACT
MITIGATION
INCORPORATION
e. Conflict with any local policies or X
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policv or ordinance?
f. Conflict with the provisions of an X
adopted Habitat conservation
Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional or state
habitat conservation plan?
V. CUtTOKAL I-{!::SUUI-{(,;ES.
Would the Proiect:
a. Cause a substantial adverse X
change in the significance of a
historical resource as defined in
Section 15064.5
b. Directly or indirectly destroy a X
unique paleontological resource
or site or unique geologic
feature?
c. Disturb any human remains, X
including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries?
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would
the proiect:
a. Expose people or structures to X
potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss,
iniurv or death involvino:
i) Rupture a known earthquake X
fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or
based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault? Refer
to Division of Mines and Geology
Soecial Publication 42.
ii) Cause strong seismic ground X
shakino?
III) Cause seismic-related ground X
failure, includino liouefaction?
iVl Cause Landslides? X
b. Result in substantial soil erosion X
or the loss of topsoil?
27 of 39
5
April 26, 2005 Item # ).
EIS and Checklist
TPM 04-05
ISSUE POTENTIALLY POTENTIALLY LESS THAN NO
SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
IMPACT UNLESS IMPACT
MITIGATION
INCORPORATION
c. Be located on a geologic unit or X
soil that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of
the project, and potentially result
in on or off site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence,
linuefaction or collaose?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as X
defined in Table 18-1-B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial risk to life or
nronertv?
e. Have soils incapable of X
adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative
wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available
for the disnosal of wastewater?
VI I. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS. Would the oroiect:
a. Create a significant hazard to the X
public or the environment through
the routine transport, use, or
disoosal of hazardous materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the X
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials
into the environment?
c. Emit hazardous emissions or X
handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-
quarter mile of an existing or
oronosed school?
d. Be located on a site which is X
included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant
to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it
create a significant hazard to the
oublic or the environment?
28 of 39
6
April 26, 2005 Item # '-
EIS and Checklist
TPM 04-05
ISSUE POTENTIALLY POTENTIALLY LESS THAN NO
SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
IMPACT UNLESS IMPACT
MITIGATION
INCORPORATION
e. For a project located within an X
airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been
adopted, within miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would
the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or
workino within the oroiect area?
f. Far a project in the vicinity of a X
private airstrip, would the project
resultin-a-safety hazard for
people residing or working in the
oroiect area?
g. Impair implementation of, or X
physically interfere with, an
adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation
nlan?
h. Expose people or structures to a X
significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires
including where wildlands are
adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed
with wildlands?
VIII.HYDROLOGY AND WATER
QUALITY. Would the oroiect
a. Result in an increase in pollutant X
discharge to receiving waters?
Consider water quality parameters
such as temperature, dissolved
oxygen, turbidity and other typical
storm water pollutants (e.g. heavy
metals, pathogens, petroleum
derivatives, synthetic organics,
sediment, nutrients, oxygen-
dem~~ding substances, and
trash.
b. Result in significant alteration of X
receiving water quality during or
followino construction?
c. Result in increased impervious X
surfaces and associated
increased runoff?
29 of 39
7
April 26, 2005 Item # )..
EIS and Checklist
TPM 04-05
ISSUE POTENTIALLY POTENTIALLY LESS THAN NO
SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
IMPACT UNLESS IMPACT
MITIGATION
INCORPORATION
d. Create a significant adverse X
environmental impact to drainage
patterns due to changes in runoff
flow rates or volumes?
e. Substantially deplete X
groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater
recharge such that there would
be a net deficit in aquifer volume
or a lowering of the local
groundwater table lever
(e.g. the production rate of pre-
existing nearby wells would drop
to a level, which would not
support existing land uses or
planned uses for which permits
have been aranted.
f. Result in increased erosion X
downstream?
g. Project tributary to an already X
impaired water body as listed on
the Clean Water Act Section 303(d)
list? If so, can it result in an
increase in any pollutant for which
the water body is already
impaired?
h. Is the project tributary to other X
environmentally sensitive areas?
Is so, can it exacerbate already
sensitive conditions?
i. Have a potentially significant X
environmental impact on surface
water quality, to either marine,
fresh, or wetland waters?
j. Have a potentially significant
adverse impact on ground water
aualitv?
k. Cause or contribute to an X
exceedance of applicable surface
or groundwater receiving water
quality objectives or degradation of
beneficial uses?
I. Impact aquatic, wetland, or riparian X
habitat?
30 of 39
8
April 26, 2005 Item # ~
EIS and Checklist
TPM 04-05
m. Create or contribute runoff water X
which would exceed the capacity
of existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of
oollute runoff?
n. Place housing within a 100-year X
flood hazard area as mapped on
a Federal Flood Hazard boundary
or Flood Insurance Rate Map or
other flood hazard delineation
mao?
o. Place within a 1 OO-year flood X
hazard area structures which
would impede or redirect flood
flows?
p. Exposing people or structures to X
a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of
a levee or dam?
q. Cause inundation by seiche, X
tsunami, or mudflow?
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING.
Would the oroiect:
a. Physically divide an established X
communitv?
b. Conflict with applicable land use X
plan, policy, or regulation of an
agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including, but not limited
to the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating
an environmental effect?
c. Conflict with any applicable X
habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation
olan.
X. MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the oroiect:
a. Result in the loss of availability of X
a known mineral resource that
would be of future value to the
region and the residents of the
State?
b. Result in the loss of availability of X
a locally-important mineral
resource recovery site
delineated on a local general
plan, speCific plan or other land
use olan?
31 of 39
9
April 26, 2005 Item # ,j..
EIS and Checklist
TPM 04-05
ISSUE POTENTIALLY POTENTIALLY LESS THAN NO
SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
IMPACT UNLESS IMPACT
MITIGATION
INCORPORATION
XI. NOISE. Would the project result
in:
a. Exposure of persons to, or X
generation of, noise levels in
excess of standards established
in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable
standards of other aaencies?
b. Exposure of persons to, or X
genera110n of excessive
ground borne vibration or
around borne noise levels?
c. A substantial permanent increase X
in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels
existina without the nroiect?
d. A substantial temporary or X
periodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without the
oroiect?
e. For a project located within an X
airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or pUblic use
airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise
levels?
f. For a project within the vicinity of X
a private airstrip, would the
project expose people residing or
working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING.
Would the oroiect:
a. Induce substantial growth in an X
area either directly (for example,
by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure \?
b. Displace substantial numbers of X
existing housing, necessitating
the construction of replacement
housino elsewhere?
32 of 39
10
April 26, 2005 Item # ~
EIS and Checklist
TPM 04-05
ISSUE POTENTIALLY POTENTIALL Y LESS THAN NO
SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
IMPACT UNLESS IMPACT
MITIGATION
INCORPORATION
c. Displace substantial numbers of X
people, necessitating the
construction of replacement
housinq elsewhere?
XIII.PUBLlC SERVICES. Would the
proiect:
a. Result in substantial adverse X
physical impacts associated with
the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities,
need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or
other performance objectives for
any of the public services.
i. Fire protection? X
ii. Police protection? X
iii. Schools? X
iv. Parks? X
v. Other public facilities? X
XIV.RECREA TION
a. Would the project increase the X
use of existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration
of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b. Does the project include X
recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might
have an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
XV. TRANSPORTATION
rrRAFFIC. Would the project:
a. Cause an increase in traffic, which X
is substantial in relation to the
existing traffic load and capacity
of the street system (i.e., result in a
substantial increase in either the
number of vehicle trips, the volume
to capacity ratio on roads, or
congestion at intersections)?
.~
,),) OT,):1 ..."'. I "", "UUi> ""III"
11
EIS and Checklist
TPM 04-05
ISSUE POTENTIALLY POTENTIALLY LESS THAN NO
SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
IMPACT UNLESS IMPACT
MITIGATION
INCORPORATION
b. Exceed, either individually or X
cumulatively, a level of service
standard established by the county
congestion management agency
for desiQnated roads or hiQhwavs?
c. Result in a change in air traffic X
patterns, including either an
increase in traffic levels or a
change in location that results in
substantial safety risks?
d. Substantially increase hazards X
due to a design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.Q., farm equipment)?
e. Result in inadequate emergency X
access?
f. Result in inadequate parking X
capacity?
g. Conflict with adopted policies, X
plans, or programs supporting
alternative transportation (e.g.,
bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE
SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a. Exceed wastewater treatment X
requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control
Board?
b. Require or result in the X
construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities
or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c. Require or result in the X
construction of new stormwater
drainage facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction
of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
d. Have sufficient water supplies X
available to serve the project from
existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or
e~panded entitlements needed? A. . .... ........ .. I~ ~
v~ v. v_ ~.... __, ____ '0_... ~
12
EIS and Checklist
TPM 04-05
ISSUE POTENTIALLY POTENTIALLY LESS THAN NO
SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
IMPACT UNLESS IMPACT
MITIGATION
INCORPORATION
e. Result in the determination by the X
wastewater treatment provider,
which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate
capacity to serve project's
projected demand in addition to
the provider's existing
commitments?
f. Be served be a landfill with X
sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project's solid
waste disoosal needs?
g. Comply with federal, site and X
local statutes and regulations
related to solid waste?
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS
OF SIGNIFICANCE
a. Does the project have the potential X
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-
sustaining levels. Threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal, or
eliminated important examples or
the major periods of California
historv or orehistorv?
b. Does the project have impacts that X
are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects
of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the
effects of past projects, the effects
of other current projects, and the
effect of probably future proiects)?
c. Does the project have X
environmental effects, which
will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly.
35 of 39
13
April 26, 2005 Item # :J.
EIS and Checklist
TPM 04-05
D. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Please refer to the Environmental Initial Study Checklist Form above when reading the
following evaluation.
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
36 of 39
AESTHETICS: The project will not have a significant adverse impact on the aesthetics
of the area. Future development of the created lots will be required to comply with City
development standards.
AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: The present land use of the subject property is
residential. The proposed subdivision will result in additional residential development.
The project therefore will not have a significant adverse impact on the agricultural
resources in the area.
AIR QUALITY: The project could ultimately result in the development of two additional
residential lots. Automobile use and other miscellaneous are emissions associated
with each residence will have an incremental impact on the ambient air quality in the
area. The project however will not result in a significant adverse impact on the air
quality in the area.
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Pursuant to Vegetation Map #1 of the Poway Subarea
Habitat Conservation Plan the subject property is mapped as being developed. No
native habitat is shown to exist on the site. Therefore it has been determined that the
project will not have a significant adverse impact on the biological resources in the
area.
CULTURAL RESOURCES: The project site does not contain any historical structures
According to the Poway General Plan, the project site is located in an area with
moderate probability of archaeological resource, but since the project proposes
develop single-family homes on a previously developed residential site, the probability
of finding any cultural resources is low. Therefore, it was determined that the project
will not have a significant adverse impact on cultural resources in the area.
GEOLOGY AND SOILS: The subject property is presently developed with two single-
family residences with an associated building pad (Parcel 1 and 2). The site is
located within an area that according to the Poway General Plan General Soil
Association Map has mapped this area to contain Ramona-Placentia Association soil.
This is a type of soil that is well drained to moderately well drained sandy loam, with a
subsoil of sandy clay over granitic alluvium.
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 the subject property is not listed on the current listing (November 2004) of the
Hazardous Materials Establishments and Sites as prepared by the San Diego County
Department of Environmental Health. The project is a residential subdivision and the
use will not involve hazardous materials. The project therefore will not result in a
significant adverse hazardous impact in the area.
VIII.
HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: An incremental increase in the amount of
surface runoff will result from the construction of impervious surfaces when !he
14 April 26, 2005 Item # ;1-
EIS and Checklist
TPM 04-05
subdivided lots are developed. The developer is required to construct drainage
improvements that are capable of handling runoff on the site and that are designed
in conformance with the City of Poway drainage standards.
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Tentative Parcel Map 04-04 has been designed to
conform with the General Plan and the Poway Municipal Code. Future development of
the created lots will also be required to be in character with development in the area
and comply with applicable City development requirements.
X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Pursuant to the City of Poway Master Environmental
Assessment prepared in conjunction with the 1990 update to the Poway General Plan,
there are no known mineral resources on the site.
XI. NOISE: The Poway General Plan requires that the maximum exterior noise levels in a
single-family residential zone not exceed 60 decibels and interior noise levels not
exceed 45 decibels. Development of the subdivision will be required to conform with
standards in the Poway Municipal Code and Poway General Plan.
Development associated with the subdivision will result in a temporary increase in
ambient noise levels in the area during the construction phases. The developer will be
required to comply with the City's Noise Ordinance requirements that govern
construction activity.
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: The project will result in an incremental increase in
area population, however it is not considered to be significant. The Poway Municipal
Code for this zone provided conceptually for the proposed density of the subject
property.
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES: The project will not have a significant adverse impact on the
public services of the area. There are adequate public services to serye the project.
XIV. RECREATION: The project will not have a significant adverse impact on the
recreational facilities that seryice this area. There are adequate recreational facilities
to serye the project.
XV. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: The project will not have a significant adverse
impact on the level of service on area roadways. The project will result in an
incremental increase in traffic in the area. According to the 998 SANDAG Brief Guide
of Traffic Generation Rates, a total of approximately 20 new vehicle trips (10 trips for
each of the two additional parcels) will be generated by the project at build-out.
Development of the property will require payment of Traffic Mitigation fees for each
new residence.
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: The project will not have a significant adverse
impact on utility service in the area. There are adequate utilities to serve the project.
XVII. MANDATORY FINDING OF SIGNIFICANCE: TPM 04-05 will not have a significant
adverse impact on the environment because of the design of the project, coupled with
the requirement to meet existing standard City requirements.
M:lplannlngI05reportltpmITPM04-04_ V AR04-14_Jamilleis_ checklist final.doc
37 of 39 April 26, 2005 Item # ~
15
~
~ " " " "
, " 0 " "
~ :!! " ~ 0
.. ~ N
Iii ~ 0 0 ~
~ ~ -< -< .....
c 1iS1il~ ~-
~"O ilI~t\i!l
"H~~~~~
~ t:'I.... >'ti >;l::j >-
- i!i ~ 1!'!Ii
~ e: ~~ (n ~
u
<(
-------.
@~
o
,
,
W
I 0..
---'----Gle
; ; u ..
, . U ...
<(E
GI
'W
C:la
!IS WI'
I /
I /
I I
--j-
I
I
-- II
n
I
I
- -t Ii 9,f' -
i Ii "-,-
: : c"
i i <,
'" i Ii B ~c,
C't'! ! ,~,f'lc
1:! I' .... cYjY
0/,>. III
~i >~
:vi I ~0
I ~
I
38 of 39
~
c.
GI
_ u
--e
19
'C
~
'0
i,- !
<(,
3N'1l onOl:) a3~
@
I
! ~,f'
"'c;
,f'o
"
f'q,
1'cYjY
* .0Z-.'
- r . (
3,lV:lS
ATTACHMENT E
I
21
,W I
o
cr:1
,
1<( I
Ie) I
----1-- -
I I
I
r
I
I
",.Q
<(
o
0::
Z
W
Q
0::
<(
C)
i
II
,I
cr:
I,i
"
--
April 26, 2005 Item # )-
- -+- ---+
r I
f I
, i
I
I
,--.
~
. ~
" t 0
lQ ~ ~
I-' ....:
~ ~
o 0
~ N
N
.. " U
~ ~::!o: ::!o: Q <(
~ ~~ ~ <
~ ! ~ i ~ ~~ j --------@ ~---
~ a ~~ C1~ ~ .
N e:0i-",,(n~ 0
.
(
I I
. I
--+--+--
: !
I
I
I
I
I
II
(
(
I
I
1.1
jt.
(
!
- ! ---rr- ;- -
[ li~,
: i Of;
! i 0,
~ i Ii :r'c";
c'E'1 I f'*.
1/~ r O"/y
~li>- ~
2)1 I ~
I
I
.,
-- CII
c
0... !II :::i I
- - -~~~
@ ~ sf' 'cf'o
n Q, );
- ~
l C *.
z.- e O"/y
~
]NIfl On01J 03"
""'-
(
I
~
,
;.,
.
~
~ r--
* .OZ=.'
~ .' (
]lVJS
39 of 39
-
ATTACHMENT F
II
I '" ~., ~,
April 26, 2005 Item # ;-