The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 5 - Intention to Levy and Collect Assessements - Poway LMD 86-2 AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY FROM: James L. Bowersox, City Mana TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council INITIATED BY: Jim Howell, Director of Public Work DATE: April 26, 2005 SUBJECT: Engineer's Report and Resolution Declaring the Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments Within Poway Landscape Maintenance District 86-2 for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 and Set Date for Public Hearing ABSTRACT The maintenance of public landscape improvements within Landscape Maintenance District 86-2 requires funding. The California Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (ACT) allows for the collection of assessments from parcels annexed into the District for this purpose. In order to collect assessments, Chapter 3 of the ACT requires a resolution declaring the intention to levy and collect assessments and an Engineer's Report. There are currently 110 assessable residential Zone A parcels and 164 assessable residential parcels in Zone B of LMD 86-2. Fiscal Year 2005/2006 assessments for Zone A are proposed to remain at the Fiscal Year 2004/2005 rate of $186.16 per benefit unit. Zone B assessments are proposed to increase by property owner approved balloting done in 1998. Assessments are proposed to increase 3.5 percent from $2727.04 to $281.56 ($9.52 per year or $0.793 per month) per benefit unit based on the 2004 San Diego Consumer Price Index. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This item is not subject to CEQA review. FISCAL IMPACT Revenues collected at $186.16 for Zone A and $281.56 for Zone B per benefit unit will be used for the District's maintenance costs during Fiscal Year 2005/2006. A general benefit contribution of $4,650.52 ($2,450.44 for Zone A and $2,200.08 for Zone B) will be made by the City of Poway based upon General Fund average maintenance of landscaped medians and rights-of-way. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE None. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1) adopt the attached resolution declaring the intention to levy and collect assessments with Poway Landscape Maintenance District No. 86-2 for Fiscal Year 2005/2006; 2) approve the corresponding preliminary Engineer's Report outlining the assessments for Fiscal Year 2005/2006; 3) direct the City Clerk to publish the approved resolution one week following Council approval; and 4 ) set public hearinQ for June 21, 2005. ACTION 1 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item # ,...., CITY OF POWA Y AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members 0 the City Council ublic work~ FROM: James L. Bowersox, City Mana INITIATED BY: Jim Howell, Director of Public Wo Dennis K. Quillen, Assistant Dir Javid Siminou, City Engineer Patricia S. Nelson, Assessmen pecialist~ DATE: April 26, 2005 SUBJECT: Engineer's Report and Resolution Declaring the Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments Within Poway Landscape Maintenance District 86-2 for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 and Set Date for Public Hearing BACKGROUND The Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 86-2) was formed on May 20, 1986 to maintain landscape improvements of various subdivisions or developments included within the district boundaries. Each subdivision and/or development listed below was required to annex into the District as a condition of property development either through the final map process or by Council resolution. District 86-2 Zone A includes the following residential developments: TM 4185R TM 87-12 TM 89-03 TPM 97-15 TTM 89-05 Sunrise Ranch SilverRidge Eagle Pointe (aka La Paz Summit) Paradise Development Southern Hills (aka Poway Summit Estates) Zone B (residential developments) includes the following: TM 83-02 Sycamore Creek FINDINGS The estimated value of the LMD improvements being maintained within Landscape Maintenance District 86-2 is $656,360 for Zone A and $514,490 for Zone B. Zone A Fiscal Year 2005/2006 assessments are proposed to remain atthe Fiscal Year 200412005 2 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item # E- Agenda Report: Intent to Levy Assessments LMD 86-2 April 26, 2005 Page 2 rate of $186.16 per year (or $15.51 per month) per benefit unit. Zone B assessments are proposed to increase from $272.04 to $281.56 per year (or $23.46 per month, and increase of $9.52 per year or $0.793 per month) per benefit unit. This rate increase is to assist in the care of new irrigation and plant restoration due to the 2003 Cedar Fire. This rate increase of 3.5 percent is allowable under Assessment Law as property owners favorably approved a ballot initiative in 1998 including increases based on the previous year's San Diego Consumer Price Index. Under Assessment Law (Article XIII 0, Section 20)), those properties not receiving special benefit have been omitted from the LMD 86-2A Assessment Roll. Zone B was not affected by the requirement. Proposition 218, which was passed by the California voters on November 6, 1996, expands the requirements for public notification and imposes the requirement of District balloting. Beginning July 1, 1997, all existing, new, or increased assessments shall comply with Article XIII 0 as added to the California Constitution. All parcels currently assessed were annexed into the District by owner consent at the time of development. However, this does not exempt assessment increases in future years. Subsequent increases in such assessments shall be subject to the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4 of Article XIII D. Zone A (residential) balloting for an increase in Fiscal Year 1998/99 assessments failed. Therefore, the assessment rate is proposed to remain unchanged from the Fiscal Year 1997/1998 rate. Therefore, Zone A is exempt from the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4 of Article XIII D. The failure of an assessment increase by ballot for Zone A in Fiscal Year 1998/1999 led to a reduction of maintenance services. Although this District has received a reduced level of service to meet the revenue received, the current contractor hired to maintain these areas has proven to be proficient in water management and plant preseryation. Therefore, the District has been able to continue tree maintenance and plant renovation. As required under Assessment Law (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 and its amendments), an Engineer's Report and assessment recommendations must be presented for City Council consideration and public comment on an annual basis. This report (Attachment 2) has been found technically correct as presented. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This item is not subject to CEQA review. 3 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item # s Agenda Report - Intent to Levy Assessments LMD 86-2 April 26, 2005 Page 3 FISCAL IMPACT Revenues collected at $186.16 for Zone A and $281.56 for Zone B will be used for the District's maintenance costs during Fiscal Year 2005/2006. A general benefit contribution of $4,650.52 ($2,450.44 for Zone A and $2,200.08 for Zone B) will be made by the City of Poway based upon General Fund maintenance of landscaped medians and rights-of-way. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE None. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1) adopt the attached resolution declaring the intention to levy and collect assessments within Poway Landscape Maintenance District No. 86-2 for Fiscal Year 2005/2006; 2) approve the corresponding preliminary Engineer's Report outlining the assessments for Fiscal Year 2005/2006; 3) direct the City Clerk to publish the approved resolution one week following Council approval; and 4) set public hearing for June 21, 2005. JLB: JRH:DKQ:JS:PSN Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. Engineer's Report 4of27 April 26, 2005 Item # 5 RESOLUTION NO. 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA DECLARING THE INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN POWAY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 86-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Poway desires to levy and collect assessments within Poway Landscape Maintenance District 86-2 for the purpose of maintaining, servicing, and operating public landscape facilities located within the territory comprised of said district as shown in Exhibit "A" of the Engineer's Report that is on file in the City Clerk's Office, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, and attached hereto; and WHEREAS, assessments will not increase from the Fiscal Year 2004/2005 assessment rate of $186.16 per benefit unit for Zone A; and WHEREAS, assessments will increase as approved by Zone B property owners in 1998 through a duly authorized balloting process under Assessment Law. The assessment rate will increase from $272.04 to $281.56 per benefit unit for Zone B; and WHEREAS, under Article XIII 0, Section 4 of the California Constitution, a City general benefit contribution has been calculated as the average General Fund expenditure on a per square foot basis for the maintenance of landscaped medians and rights-of-way. The general benefit contributions for Zones A and B have been calculated to be $2,450.44 and $2,200.08, respectively; and WHEREAS, under Article XIII 0, Section 5(b) of the California Constitution, the collection of Fiscal Year 2005/2006 assessments is exempt from the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4 of Article XIII 0, in that the assessment was imposed pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed; and WHEREAS, the public interest and convenience require the maintenance, seryice, and operation of public landscaping within said territory. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ofthe City of Poway as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and the City Council so finds and determines. 2. Proposed assessments are as detailed in the Engineer's Report for Poway Landscape Maintenance District No. 86-2 for Fiscal Year 2005/2006. ATTACHMENT 1 5 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item #-5- Resolution No. 05- Page 2 3. Pursuant to the Streets and Highways Code, a public hearing will be held on June 21, 2005 by the City Council to consider the levy and collection of the proposed assessments. PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Poway, California, at a regular meeting this 26th day of April 2005. Michael P. Cafagna, Mayor ATTEST: L. Diane Shea, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) I, L. Diane Shea, City Clerk ofthe City of Poway, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 05- , was duly adopted by the City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on the 26th day of April 2005, and that it was so adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DISQUALIFIED: L. Diane Shea, City Clerk City of Poway 6 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item # 5 ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR POWAY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86.2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 Preamble Pursuant to the provisions of the City of poway Resolution No. 00-034 (Policies for Landscape Maintenance Districts) and the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972" (being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Street and Highways Code). applicable provisions of "Proposition 218" (being Article XIII of the California Constitution), and provisions of the "Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act" (being California State Bill 919) (all of which are hereinafter called collectively "Assessment Law"), and in accordance with the Resolution of Intention, being Resolution No. 05- , adopted by the City Council of the City of Poway, County of San Diego. State of California, in connection with the proceedings for Landscape Maintenance District 86-2 (hereinafter referred to as "District"), this report for the District is submitted for assessment hearing proceedings as required by California Streets and Highways Code Section 22565. Backaround District 86-2 was formed on May 20, 1986 to finance the maintenance of landscape improvements installed in conjunction with new subdivisions within the boundaries of the District (Exhibit A). This report sets forth the findings and engineering analysis for Poway Landscape Maintenance District 86-2 for Fiscal Year 2005/2006. Maps of subdivisions and facilities (Exhibit B) are on file in the City of Poway Public Works Department Special Districts Office, and a part of this report by reference only. On November 5, 1996, the California electorate passed Proposition 218 that added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution and changed various aspects of government finance law. These have since been incorporated into the California Streets and Highways Code. Findinas The Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (Act) allows assessments to be levied against properties for the maintenance of certain public improvements within a subject district according to benefit rather than estimated value (Section 22573). The necessary revenue required to maintain the landscaping improvements within Poway Landscape Maintenance District 86-2 have been calculated according to benefit for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 as provided for by the Act. All assessments collected within this District will be expended on maintenance, utilities, and administration of District 86-2 landscape improvements. In 1998, property owners within the District received ballots as specified under Assessment Law. Both zones were balloted for an increase in assessments with annual cost indexing based on the annual San Diego Consumer Price Index (SD-CPI). Zone A (Sunrise Ranch, SilverRidge, and Eagle Pointe) did not have a consensus for the increase, and therefore, ATTACHMENT 2 7 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item # 5 Engineer's Report - LMD 86-2 FY 2005/2006 Page 2 failed to pass the ballot. Zone B (Sycamore Creek) passed the ballot allowing for the option of an annual increase based on the San Diego-Consumer Price Index on an as needed basis. Subsequent increases for Zone A are subject to a majority petition of at least 51 percent of the property owners addressed to the City of Poway. This petition, if approved, shall initiate the balloting process and be subject to the procedures and ballot approval process set forth in Section 4 of Article XIIID. As of the writing of this report, the City has not received a petition from the property owners within this District zone. As a result, balloting will not be initiated. The annual assessment rates for Zone A is proposed to remain at the Fiscal Year 2004/2005 rate of$186.16 per benefit unit (one parcel). This District Zone is exempt from the process set forth in Section 4 of Article XIIID as the assessments were imposed pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was (is) initially imposed. Zone B assessment will increase by 3.5 percent as set forth in Section 4 of Article XIIID by property owner majority approved balloting in 1998. The balloting in 1998 allows for increases on a year-by-year basis. This is the second year assessments have increased since balloting. Assessments are proposed to increase from $272.04 to $281.56 ($9.52 per year or $0.793 per month) per benefit unit (parcel) and will be collected through the Fiscal Year 2006 San Diego County Property Tax Roll. District Proceedinas for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 This District will be authorized and administered under the provisions of City of Poway Resolution No. 00-034, the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972," applicable provisions of "Proposition 218," and provisions of the "Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act." This Engineer's Report has been prepared in compliance with Assessment Law. District Boundarv The boundary of the District contains all parcels proposed to be assessed. The Boundary Map and Assessment Diagram, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Engineer's Report, are on file with the Special Districts Office of the Public Works Department of the City of Poway and are available for public inspection during normal business hours. A reduced copy of the Boundary Map is included as Exhibit A, hereto attached. The Boundary Map shows the District planning boundaries, the District boundary and the parcels proposed to be assessed, the zone boundaries, and the general location of District improvements. 8 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item # S Engineer's Report - LMD 86-2 FY 2005/2006 Page 3 On February 25, 1992, by Council Resolution No. 92-039, Landscape Maintenance District 86-2 was divided into two residential subzones. Assessments for each zone within LMD 86-2 will be calculated on a per unit basis by dividing the required revenue by the total units within each District zone. No new improvements or assessed parcels were added to the District during Fiscal Year 2004/2005. District 86-2 Zone A (97 parcels assessed), includes the following residential developments: TTM 4185R TTM 87-12 TTM 89-03 TPM 97-15 TTM 89-05 Sunrise Ranch Poway Villas (aka SilverRidge) La Paz Summit (aka Eagle Point) Paradise Development Southern Hills (aka Poway Summit Estates) District 86-2 Zone B (164 parcels assessed), includes the following residential development: TTM 83-02 Sycamore Creek Proiect DescriDtion - Facilities and Maintenance The facilities to be maintained by Zone A of the District are defined as landscape improvements, including walls and fences adjacent to open space, within the rights-of-way and open space areas associated with annexed subdivisions and which are adjacent to portions of Poway Road and within portions of the interior of the Eagle Pointe (aka La Paz Summit) subdivision. Zone B landscape improvements are those adjacent to portions of Garden Road, Sycamore Valley Road, Quiet Valley Road, Hidden Valley Road, portions of the open space, and areas abutting the City's recreational trails and mini parks. Walls and fences adjacent to private property are to be maintained by the adjacent property owners. The DistricUCity, prior to commencement of work, shall approve repairs or reconstruction of any walls or fences adjacent to the District landscape areas. Should the property owners desire to include major repairs or reconstruction within the District responsibilities, the property owners are required to submit a petition to initiate the balloting process set forth in Section 4 of Article XIIID. Landscape maintenance performance standards and specifications have been developed by the City of Poway to assure quality maintenance of landscape assessment district properties. A recent assessment of the present level of quality has been conducted, and the current maintenance levels meet the City's landscape maintenance standards. 9 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item #~ Engineer's Report - LMD 86-2 FY 2005/2006 Page 4 The estimated value of the existing improvements to be maintained under LMD 86-2 is $656,360 for Zone A, and $514,490 for Zone B. Collection of Assessments Assessments will be collected from parcels annexed into the District on the annual property tax roll. Assessments, however, cannot be collected from public-owned parcels (I.e., all public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, all easements and rights-of-way, all public parks, greenbelts and parkways, and all public school property being used for public school purposes) that lie within the district boundaries. Costs associated with general benefit must be paid from other resources of the local agency. City General Benefit Contribution Assessment Law mandates that the City assess for special benefit only, and the City shall separate general benefit from special benefit. General benefit is defined as services provided to the public-at-Iarge. Special benefit is defined as services provided at a level greater than the services provided to the public-at-Iarge. The City's general benefit to the public-at-Iarge is determined as the average expenditure from the general fund for the maintenance of landscaped medians and rights- of-way calculated on a per square foot basis. The City shall make a general benefit contribution to a district based on the City's average rate of expenditure from the General Fund for the various types of improvements applied to the square footage of similar types of improvements within the District. Zone A (no new improvements were added during Fiscal Year 2004/2005): Landscaped Rights-of-Way Zone B (no new improvements were added during Fiscal Year 2004/2005): Landscaped Rights-of-Way 24,720 Sq. Ft. 10 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item #-..EL. Engineer's Report - LMD 86-2 FY 2005/2006 Page 5 The City shall annually conduct an audit to determine the average expenditure from the General Fund forthe maintenance of landscape improvements within the public rights- of-way or public easements, calculated on a per square foot basis. The general benefit for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 is determined to be: $0.0890 per square foot for landscaped rights-of-way As part of the audit, the City shall determine the average expenditure from the General Fund for the maintenance of District landscape improvements. City-employed landscape staff did not receive a salary increase for Fiscal Year 2004/2005. Therefore, the general benefit is to remain at the FY 2004/2005 rate. Zone A: 27,533 square feet landscaped rights-of-way x $0.0890 = $2,450.44 Zone B: 24,720 square feet landscaped rights-of-way x $0.0890 = $2,200.08 All other maintenance, operation, administrative, and incidental costs, which exceed the City's general benefit contribution to the public-at-Iarge, are special benefit and assessed to the District. The City shall have an option how it will make the general benefit contributions to the District. The City shall make its contribution by either: . providing irrigation water to the District for irrigation of LMD improvements in an amount equal to the City's general benefit contribution, or · paying directly to the District from General Fund a dollar amount equal to the City's general benefit contribution. 11 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item # 5 Engineer's Report - LMD 86-2 FY 2005/2006 Page 6 Estimated Costs An estimate of Fiscal Year 2005/2006 costs associated with maintenance of District improvements is included as follows: LMD 86-2A FY 03/04 FY 04/05 FY 04/05 Contract 15,680' 15,680 12,900 Water/Power 7,160 7,450 6,150 Administration 6,1102 6,110 3,920 BUDGET 28,950 29,240 22,970 6-Month Reserve 14,475 14,620 11,485 TOTAL 43,425 43,860 34,455 Cash Carry Over (12,750) (14,475) (14,620) REQUIRED REVENUE 30,675 29,385 19,835 Interest Used (1,200) (800) 0 Reserves Used (6,625) (5,655) 0 CITY GEN'L BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION 2,370 2,450 2,450 ASSESSMENT REVENUE 20,480 20,480 20,480 Interest Earned 1,200 800 420 Reserves Added 0 0 3,095 Appropriated Reserve Fund Balance 1,6353 0 3,515 Unappropriated Reserve Fund Balance 15,000 10,980 10,980 Since this District failed its ballot in 1998 for an increase in assessments, no funding has been allocated to the contract budget for emergencies. 1 Anticipated increase for replacement of corroded controllers with new stainiess steel 2 Includes portion of Districts' contribution to, and equal to nine percent of the budget for, Fund 0406, Maintenance Operations. 3 Corrected per Finance Fiscal Year 2001/2002 Activity Sheets. 12 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item #-5.... Engineer's Report - LMD 86-2 FY 2005/2006 Page 7 LMD 86-2B FY 03/ 04 FY 04/ 05 FY 04/ 05 Contract 28,150 24,660 50,990' Contract (Appropriated into budget for 29,000 0 0 emergencies) Contract (Allocated into budget for Cedar 84,000 0 0 Fire Renovations) Water/Power 10,600 12,020 11,400 Administration6 10,130 10,130 7,330 BUDGET 77,880 46,810 69,720 6-Month Reserve 24,4407 23,405 34,860 TOTAL 102,320 70,215 104,580 Cash Carry Over (24,570) (24,440) (23,405) REQUIRED REVENUE 77,750 45,575 81,175 Interest Used (6,150) 0 (2,010) Reserves Used (26,620) 0 (30,885) CITY GEN'l BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION 2,130 2,200 2,200 ASSESSMENT REVENUE 43,000 44,615 46,180 Interest Earned 6,150 6,000 2,010 Reserves Added 0 1,040 0 Appropriated Reserve Fund Balance 08 7,040 26,570 Unappropriated Reserve Fund Balance 34,2209 120,28010 69,865 4 Increase in Contract due to area renovation after Cedar Fire 5 This item is now included within the LMD budget as funding for emergencies above and beyond the normal and routine expenses as they arise. Any funds remaining from this budgeted item will be rolled over into the next fiscai year. 6 Includes portion of Districts' contribution to, and equal to nine percent of the budget for, Fund 0406, Maintenance Operations. 7 The six-month reserve is based on all routine budgeted items excluding Appropriated Reserve Funds that are used for contractual emergencies. 8 Reduced to cover Cedar Fire Renovation Expenses 9 Corrected per Finance Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Activity Sheets 10 Corrected per Finance Fiscai Year 2003/20004 Activity Sheets 13 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item # ~ Engineer's Report - LMD 86-2 FY 2005/2006 Page 8 Historv The City of poway was incorporated in December 1980. In October 1983, the City adopted its first General Plan. A major theme and vision of the City's General Plan is preservation of Poway's identity as "The City in the Country." Poway's intent is to maintain a high quality of design and environmental standards in all new development and redevelopment. Poway's community identity has set it apart by providing a quality of life unique from the surrounding communities. The General Plan establishes several goals, strategies, and policies to preserve the image of "The City in the Country:" . Seek to develop an attractive streetscape which reflects the rural small town character of the City. · Streetscape design should encourage an aesthetic roadway area that integrates, among other things, landscaping. · Landscape medians should be constructed in roadways adjacent to commercial areas to direct traffic and provide a more rural, scenic roadway area. · Use of walls and landscaped areas to separate commerciallindustrial land uses from adjoining residential land uses. . Adding extensive landscaping to the rights-of-way to give the impression of a private road. . Dedication of landscaped public open space easements of 50 feet in width along designated scenic routes to preserve the rural aesthetics. . Residential projects shall provide walls and landscaped rights-of-way along arterial and major streets. The effect of these and other policies is the dedication of public rights-of-way and easements, and the financing, construction, installation, and establishment of public improvements conditioned upon development. Not all developments, however, are required to contain the above elements in their entirety (e.g., walls/fences are to be specifically addressed and within the Landscape Maintenance District boundaries as described on each project's landscape as-built plans). These public improvements require ongoing maintenance to effectively accomplish the General Plan's stated goal, and thus benefit developing lands by preserving the community's image, quality of life, property values, and aesthetics. 14 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item # 5 Engineer's Report - LMD 86-2 FY 2005/2006 Page 9 lands Benefitina from Improvements The lands determined to receive benefit are those lands that, as a result of development or redevelopment, finance, construct, install, and/or establish landscape improvements within public rights-of-way or public easements (permanent public improvement) or adjoining lands that, as a result of development or redevelopment, receive access or are immediately adjacent to lands which contain landscape improvements maintained by a landscape maintenance district. Special benefit, as defined in Assessment Law and in this report, shall be assessed to those lands determined to receive benefit from the District's improvements. Apportionment Methodoloav The total cost of special benefit for maintenance of the public improvements funded by the District will be assessed to the various parcels in the District in proportion to the benefit units assigned to each parcel, in relationship to the total benefit units assigned to all parcels being assessed. Residential Land Uses All residential subdivisions shall be assessed proportional to special benefit received based on one (1) benefit unit per residential dwelling unit. Non-residential land Uses All non-residential development shall be assessed proportional to special benefit received based on the average planned dwelling unit density throughout the urban areas of the City (four dwelling units per acre), the equivalent of four (4) benefit units per acre. Non-residential land uses typically provide seryices and/or employment opportunities for the City which benefits all lands throughout the City. Since these non-residential land uses can occur throughout the City, the planned, average density of residential dwelling units per acre forthe urban areas ofthe City has been calculated. The non-residential land uses are considered to dislocate residential units. Therefore, the number of residential dwelling units dislocated, based on the average dwelling units per acre, has been assigned to non-residential lands. This method determines an equivalent benefit to residential land uses. Exhibit B details the calculation of the average residential units per acre planned within the urban areas of the City. Urban areas have been defined as the parcels receiving water and sewer services. 15 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item #~ Engineer's Report - LMD 86-2 FY 2005/2006 Page 10 In-Lieu Assessments Under provisions of City policy, parcels may contribute in-lieu assessments by providing equivalent maintenance services for District improvements within public rights-of-way or public easements immediately adjacent to their lands. No parcels within the District are scheduled to contribute in-lieu assessments in Fiscal Year 2005/2006. Non-benefiting Parcels All public and private streets, avenues, lanes, roads, drives, courts, alleys, all public easements and rights-of-way, all dedicated open space land, and District maintained land are determined to not receive special benefit from the District's improvements. Said lands do not partake in enjoyment of the quality of life, aesthetics, property value, and community image as other properties that benefit and are enjoyed by the owners. In contrast, these lands are encumbered for public seryice. Benefit Units (BUs) As described above, the number of assessable benefit units attributable to each parcel receiving special benefit has been calculated and can be found in the Assessment Roll (Exhibit C). Summary Results The District Boundary Map is shown in Exhibit A. An estimate of the maintenance costs associated with District improvements is contained within this Engineer's Report. The assessment methodology utilized is as described in the text of this Engineer's Report. Based on this methodology, the benefit units, and the Fiscal Year 2005/2006 proposed assessment for each parcel were calculated and are shown in the Assessment Roll (Exhibit C). The calculated FY 2005/2006 assessment for Zone A is proposed to remain at the FY 2004/2005 assessment rate of $186.16 per benefit unit (one parcel). Zone B assessments are to increase, based on the annual San Diego Consumer Price Index (SD-CPI), from $272.04 to $281.56 ($9.52 per yearor $0.793 per month) per benefit unit per year. 16 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item #-.5.... Each lot or parcel of land within the District has been identified by a unique Diagram Number on the Assessment Roll (Exhibit C) and on the Assessment Diagrams referenced herein. Respectfully submitted, ~ ~ ~a..r Date 17 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item # 5 N w*, s LMD 86-2A EXHIBIT A-1 18 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item # 5 w.' s LMD 86-28 po a EXHIBIT A-2 19 of 27 April 26 2005 I 5 , tem# EXHIBIT B (Not Applicable to This District) 20 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item #5 Diagram Parcel FY2004l2005 Number Number Units Landuse Unit Cost Assessment (11 Owner Name __A1 3213800100 1 $186.16 $186.16 Menaoza Mana U; A2 3213800200 1 -RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Santa Rita Investment Co - ---- -- RESIDENTIAL Marfno John O;-Angela J A3 3213800400 1 $186.16 $186.16 3213800500 1 f- RESIDENTIAL $186.16 Wightman Neal J;Susan J ------- A4 $186.16 - -1 ----- Mirador Armando-B;Edna B A5 3213800600 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 ----- 1 - ~ESI15ENTIAl ----- Manning Nicholas K;Kat~- A6 3213800700 $186.16 $186.16 - ----- 1 RESIDENTIAL Nelson-Robert W; Catherine C ---- A7 3213800800 $186.16 $186.16 --- ---- - 1 RESIDENTIAL Osterhout Russell H).Jfargaret T Trs A8 3213800900 $186.16 $186.16 __on 1 -RESIDENtiAL Buffington Donald K Jr; Martha -- A9 3213801000 $186.16 $186.16 A10 3213801100 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Hubbard Family Trusto3-22-93- - - -- RESIDENTIAL Ford Family Trust A11 3213801200 1 $186.16 $186.16 - - 1 RESIDENTIAL Roma-ii Michael P;Mary K - A12 3213801300 $186.16 $186.16 ------- -- 1 RESIDENTIAL MillerJerold D Jr;Linda S - A13 3213801400 $186.16 $186.16 - - 1 - RESIDENTIAL Miller David D - --- _ A14 3213801500 $186.16 $186.16 RESIDENTIAL Stockwell-Greg9 -- ~~- 3213801600 1 $186.16 $186.16 1 RESIDENTIAL Hopp Donald M;Doris L --------- A16 3213801700 $186.16 $186.16 -1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Guataferro Mark D; Lana ------- A17 3213801800 3213801900 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Hashim Robert D;Helen L ---- A18 1 RESiDENTIAL $186.16 Gonsalves Gary E -------- A19 3213802000 $186.16 ------ 1 RESIDENTIAL Clement Family Trust --------- A20 3213802100 $186.16 $186.16 f----- 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 ----- Bauersfeld Steven; Su-san----- A21 3213802200 $186.16 - -- -- A22 3213802300 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Soffer Henry D - ---- 1 RESIDENTIAL Shore Pandoa (laVay) etal ----------- A23 _ 3213802400 $186.16 $186.16 321380:2500- -- RESIDENTIAL Johnson Gregory; Manion Mary K A24 1 $186.16 $186.16 --- 1 RESIDENTIAL Velazquez Jerry J; VanHoesen Karen B A25 _ _ 3213802600 $186.16 $186.16 -- RESIDENTIAL - - - - A26 3213802700 1 $186.16 $186.16 Warner Harold & Anne Family Trust ----- 1 RESIDENTiAL Bam Family Trust - --- _ A27 3213802800 $186.16 $186.16 1- f--RESIDENtlAl -- _A28 3213802900 $186.16 $186.16 Santiago Family-trust ---- 1 RESIDENTIAL Leos EsequieJ -& Barbara Trust -- A29 _ 3213803000 $186.16 $186.16 - 3213803100- __un RESIDENTIAL Millay Garrick-O - --- A30 1 $186.16 $186.16 A31 3213803200 1 RESIDENTIAL" $186.16 $186.16 Brown Douglas A n____ ----- 1 RESIDENTIAL Barnick William F;JuneA-- A32 3213803300 $186.16 $186.16 ----- j RESiDENTIAL Francis Jimmy E;June P - ________n_ A33 3213803400 $186.16 $186.16 - - 1 FlESIDENTIAl $186.16 Vaughn Mark R;Carol M --- A34 3213803500 $186.16 -------- 1 RESIDENTIAL ---- Lum Trust ------ A35 3213803600 $186.16 $186.16 - 1 RESIDENTIAL Culhi John C; HeTeiil'-- A36 ~ 3234600100_ $186.16 $186.16 A37 3234600200 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Sapinoso AI;Mantes------- ---- 1 n RESIDENTIAL Webb Roy J;Linda M---- A38 3234600300_1- $186.16 $186.16 1 ---- RESIDENTIAL Velasco Trust ---------- A39 3234600400 $186.16 $186_16 1 RESIDENTIAL - Koziowski David A;Colleen E --------- A40 3234600500 $186.16 $186.16 ------ I-- 1 RESIDENTIAL McLaughlin FamilyTrust _________n__ A41 3234600600 $186.16 $186.16 ---- 1 RESIDENTIAL Naas Dennis J; Leigh ------- _1\42 __ 3234600700 $186.16 $186.16 1-- 1 RESIDENTIAL ------ K-Ioeffler Gale -------- A43 3234600800 $186.16 $186.16 ------- 1 - f-- RESIDENTIAL Reynolds James E ------- __A44 3234600900 $186.16 $186.16 A45 3234601000 r RES-IDENTIAl $186.16 $186.16 Hernandez Jose-Joaqul"i1; Maribel - - ~ --- A46 3234601100 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Djobadze Michael;Branch Angelita ------- 1 RESIDENTIAL Ambroso James T;Kelli L ---------- A47 3234601200 $186.16 $186.16 1 RESIDENTIAL Boschen Chris W ---- _A48 3234601300 $186.16 $186.16 ---- ------ Exhibit C1 . Assessment Roll City of Po way Landscape Maintenance District 86-2A 86.2RoIl2006.xls I Exhibit C1 1 013 2/2412005 21 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item # .5 Exhibit C1 - Assessment Roll City of Poway Landscape Maintenance District 86-2A Diagram Parcel FY2004l2005 Number Number Units Landuse Unit Cost Assessment (1) Owner Name A49 3234601400 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Ross Jeffrey B - ------ ----- 1 RESIDENTIAL Carruthers Nicholas I; Linda- A50 3234601500 $186.16 $186.16 A51 ...... 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 Rudiger Richard L;Mary L - 3234601600 $186.16 - A52 3234601700 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Perez Family Trusfa-=17-97-------- ------ 1 RESIDENTIAL - rchristiansen Fredric.l<r---------- A53 3234601800 $186.16 $186.16 - _______n__ 1 RESIDENTIAL Neher Trust A54 3234601900 $186.16 $186.16 A55 3234602000 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Kelly Paul W;Diana K-. - 3234602100 -- ~-T- ---RESIDENTIAL Jalbuna fiust A56 $186.16 $186.16 A57 3234602200 ,- RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Reina Giovanni G;Madelyn M A58 3234602300 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Canning Jerry E -----------...- A59 3234602400 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 - Wood Family Living TrusY---------- -- A60 3234602500 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Burton Robert P;Carolyn M u_ __ __ _________ --..- 1 RESIDENTIAL Wlaker Trust A61 3234602600 $186.16 $186.16 A62 3234602700 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Newham Adam-- - ---- 1 - RESIDENTIAL Janiuk Donald J; Vivian A A63 3234602800 $186.16 $186.16 ----- -- 1 RESIDENTIAL A64 3234602900 $186.16 $186.16 Cabral David; Janet A - A65 3234603000 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Roach Richard K; Cynthia A - _n_ A66 3234603100 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Reese-John M; Hirae-Reese Lorna A67 3234603200 - r-1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Samaritoni Christopher D ----...----- n J 1 RESIDENTIAL Mills Gary L;Georgann G A68 3234603300 $186.16 $186.16 A69 3234603400 1 RE.SIlJENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Pavlovic Stephen M; Barbara A A70 32346()3500 -- 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 ~udo Kristen K - ---- ------------- ---- 1 -RESIDENTIAL Dambra Mike - ------------- A71 3234610100 $186.16 $186.16 -- r-n 1 - RESIDENTIAL Bitsimis Williiiim;Margle-A------------ A72 3234610200 $186.16 $186.16 _n__n__ f -. J RESIDENTIAL Rosen Michael D;Debra A A73 3234610300 $186.16 $186.16 ---------- -- 1 RESIDENTIAL MoyerM-arion L;Shirley W n____ A74 3234610400 $186.16 $186.16 f- 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 Beag-Stephen J;Marjorie C --- -- A75 3234610500 $186.16 ---A76 ----- 1 ~ RESIDENTIAL ------ f-AQrawal Tej;Asha -- 3234610600 $186.16 $186.16 An 3234610700 1 RESIDENTIAC $186.16 $186.16 Duncan Family Trust 07-02~91 A78 3234610800 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 DUran-OavTd;Barbara ---- f-- ---------- 1 RESIDENTIAL Roman Larry;Vanessa L A79 3234610900 $186.16 $186.16 A80 f- 3234611000 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 -Rendon Sergio F;Carmen I - f- 1 RESIDENTIAL DIal Family TrusI11-19-97 A81 3234611100 $186.16 $186.16 A82 3234611300 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Masterson Family Trust 6-24-93 A83 3234611400 --- ---1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Nelson Willim F; Rhonda K -------- - A64 - f- 3234611500 1 --f.-RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Rogerson Gerald D ---------- 1 RESIDENTIAL Provenzano Trust --------- A85 3234611600 $186.16 $186.16 -------------- f- 1 RESIDENTIAL Michaels Sean K;Roberta A86 3234611700 $186.16 $186.16 1 -RESIDENTIAL ------ Todd Thomas B;Maureen M A87 3234611800 $186.16 $186.16 - 1 RESIDENr-IAL Bade Leonard M & L K A88 3234611900 $186.16 $186.16 A89 3234612000 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Zambruski DOliglas P; Mary E 1 RESIDENTIAL ---- Reidy Joseph F A90 3234612100 $186.16 $186.16 --- ---------- 1 RESIDENTIAC Woodward Trust A91 3234612200 $186.16 $186.16 -- 1 RESIDENTIAL Meyerhoff Brian W-;Bourdages Jonne A ------- A92 3234612300 $186.16 $186.16 ------- 1 RESIDENTIAL Shimpo FamilY Trust 10-10-96 ---- A93 3234612400 $186.16 $186.16 ---------- ~211809000 ____on ----------------- ------ A94 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Davidson Curt B; Linda M ---- --------- - ------ A95 3211809100 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Merkley Scott D; Barbara J ---- A96 3211809200 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Strom mer Scott A; Leslie S A97 3211809300 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 =----- -- Thomas Gary & Nancy 86.2RoIl2006.xls f Exhibit C1 2 013 2/24/2005 22 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item #~ Exhibit C1 - Assessment Roll City of Poway Landscape Maintenance District 86-2A Diagram Parcel FY2004l2005 Number Number Units Landuse Unit Cost Assessment (1) Owner Name A98 3214200100 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Wright Terry F; Julie K A99 3214200200 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Santa Rita Investment Co A100 3214200300 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Webber Stephen R; Marilyn M A101 3214200400 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Dacanay Rhodel G; Lakshmi S - r 1 RESIDENTIAL Engelbrecht William R; Paula A A102 3214200500 $186.16 $186.16 ___u__ 1 RESIDENTIAL Norris Family 1997 frust ---------- - ---.--- A103 3214200600 $186.16 $186.16 3214200700 1 - f- RESIDENTIAL $188.16 $186.16 Sprigg Family Trust A104 I- - 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Zaatar Sa - A105 3214200800 --.- 1 RESIDENTIAL Broulillard Robert P; Susan M A106 3214200900 $186.16 $186.16 A107 3214201000 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 !-Dirienzo Richard J A108 3214201100 1 RESIDENTiAL $186.16 $188.18 Rehmani Family Trust 09-29.00 1 RESIDENTIAL Kaufhold David T; Pamela S- -- A109 3214201200 $186.16 $186.16 A110 3214201300 1 RESIDENTIAL $186.16 $186.16 Seward Marc; Stephanie Trust II TOTAL 110 $20,477.60 II (1) Assessments rounded up to even cents. 86.2RoIl2006.xls I Exhibit C1 3013 2124/2005 23 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item # .5 Exhibit C2 - Assessment Roll City of Poway Landscape Maintenance District 86-28 Diagram Parcel FY2005J2006 Number Number Units Landuse Unit Cost Assessment (11 OwnerName 81 3230712100 u $281.56 $0.00 """ .- - 0 OPEN SPACE RAK u_ _ ____.._______ 82 3230800500 $281.56 $0.00 I .- 1 .-- -- RESIDENTIAL Wendell Trust -------- 83 3234410100 $281.56 $281.56 -I-. 84 3234410200 .. 'f RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Kling Joseph 0-----'---- .. 85 - 3234410300 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Pellegrino John M;Jamie M ---..----- -..------------ 1 RESIDENTIAL Carbonea-u-Clar:k-E; Kedron-Oiane E 86 3234410400 $281.56 $281.56 B7 3234410500 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Hayden Douglas;Katherine L ------------- 1 RESIDENTIAL 8evl1l1992 Family Trust 07-01-92 ____00- 88 3234410600 $281.56 $281.56 1 - RESIDENTIAL Tait Anthony J; Deborah R 89 3234410700 $281.56 $281.56 810 3234410800 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Hu-ritlrig Kenneth 0; Nicole M T RESIDENTIAL ~ .... 811 3234410900 $281.56 $281.56 Gupta Meena -- - Dubenetzky John;ElizabethT994- Trusfo-----n------- 812 3234411000 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 813 3234411100 1 RESIDENTIAL" $281.56 $281.56 Harrison Jeffrey G;Wendy C - --------- 814 3234411200 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 PollOck Sasha R ...... 815 3234411300 1 RESIDE'NtIAL $281.56 $281.56 Rifkin Joyce L ------------- --C--" --------------- 1 RESIDENTIAL Croft James J III;Stirling DawneM 816 3234411400 $281.56 $281.56 817 3234411500 1 RESIDENTIAL" $281.56 $281.56 Burke Mathes M II;Maria 0 .- --'-r- RESIDENTIAL Smith Trust 818 3234411600 $281.56 $281.56 - 819 3234411700 1 RESIDENTTA[ $281.56 $281.56 Ng George H;Judy Y <Aka Ng Judy S Y> 1 RESIDENTIAL --- MattSon Robert W;Marcia A B20 3234411800 $281.56 $281.56 1 ..... .-. RESIDENTIAL Brazee Jonathan P; Irina B 821 . 3234411900 $281.56 $281.56 -- 1 -- --- RESIDENTIAL Aubain Trust .--.-------.---- 822 3234412000 $281.56 $281.56 823 3234412100 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 OsgoocfSheldon B;Jennifer D 1 .. RESIDENTIAL Syed Baseem M 824 3234412200 $281.56 $281.56 ----.---- 1 RESIDENtiAL Poulsen Robert A;Margaret A ------ 825 3234412300 $281.56 $281.56 I- 1 RESIDENTIAL Tregoning Stephen A; Sarah 826 3234412400 $281.56 $281.56 827 3234412500 1 ~SIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Briggs Daniel E; Kelley -. .--.-- 1---3234412600 1 RESIDENtiAL . Waddell Jeffrey A; Lara A 828 $281.56 $281.56 ---.------ C 3234412700 1 RESIDENTIAL Musgrove Jorlafhiin-P; Kacey ___n_ 829 $281.56 $281.56 1 -- .- -- RESIDENTIAL Moon Trust 830 3234412800 $281.56 $281.56 831 3234412900 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Gierzan Robert J;Lynn M 1 -- RESIDENTIAL Carter Patrick L;Valerie A 832 3234413000 $281.56 $281.56 1 - RESIDENTIAL Tiosejo Trust _n___ 833 3234413100 $281.56 $281.56 834 3234413200 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 SolankrVlj~iykumarJ ;Jyoti V ---- 835 3234413300 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Moreno-TravIs------------ 836 3234413400 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Bems-JacobW; LincIaP-------------- 837 3234413500 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Bair Charles;Mary 838 3234413600 1 R-ESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Armstrong Jolene J 839 3234413700 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 fn:avis Douglas S; Margaret K n__.__.._ --. 1 RESIDENTIAL Desio Victor R; Kara S 840 3234420100 $281.56 $281.56 841 .. 3234420200 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 fa Connor David ___no -..-.----- 1 RESIDENTIAL Goldfarb Nell; Megan . .-------.-.- 842 3234420300 $281.56 $281.56 843 - 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 Golightly Family Trust b5~(j6-97 ----------..--.-.- 3234420400 $281.56 ------ -.----.---.- .. 1 RESIDENTIAL - c- - n._.____ 844 3234420500 $281.56 $281.56 Lux Alan Jay -=---- ________ __n_ 1 RESIDENTIAL Jurf Trust -.-....- - ____________n_ 845 3234420600 $281.56 $281.56 - 1 RESlbENTT,i\[ Kfeki3-s Steven L & Nancy A B46 3234420700 $281.56 $281.56 -T ---- RESIDENTIAL Haviland Trust 847 3234420800 $281.56 $281.56 86-2RoIl2006.xls / Exhibit C2 1 014 3/812005 24 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item #~ Diagram Parcel FY200S/2006 Number Number Units Landuse Unit Cost Assessment (1) OwnerName ~- ~ 1 RESIDENTIAL Teti Trust -------- B48 3234420900 $281.56 $281.56 B49 3234421000 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Prickett Marlene L;Brotherton Luella ~r 1 RESIDENTIAL Lane James R Jr;Ardith L - -- -- B50 3234421100 $281.56 $281.58 B51 3234421200 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281 ~56 LoganRobert;-Jemnifer 1 RESIDENTIAL Rfan Michael F; Galit ~ ------ ____n i-- B52 3234421300 $281.56 $281.56 RESIDENTIAL HarWell Chris A; Kei-Chun ---- ___n__ B53 3234421400 1 $281.56 $281.56 - -- 1 RESlb~ENTIAL $281.56 Breedlove James E Jii;Lisa M I B54 3234421500 $281.56 B55 3234421600 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Polakfewicz Thomas E;Susan S i-- 1 RESIDENTIAL Kolterman Orville G;Gayle L - --- B56 3234421700 $281.56 $281.56 1 RESIDENTIAL Davies John E;Annette K ------- B57 3234421800 $281.56 $281.56 1 ~ ~ RESIDENTIAL ---- LaWSon Steven; Nancy - --- B58 3234421900 $281.56 $281.56 1 RESIDENTIAL Craig Howard C; Kathleen M ------ ---- - B59 3234422000 $281.56 $281 ~56 ------- 1 RESIDENTIAL Hagan Patrice n___________ ~O 3234422100 $281 ~56 $281.56 --- ~- ------- B61 3234422200 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Badillo Edgardo C;Rizalina I 1 RESIDENTIAL Sullins Donald F;Stephanie -------- B62 3234422300 $281.56 $281.56 I-- 1 RESIDENTIAL C-urtin Kevin B; Lynda ----- B63 3234422400 $281.56 $281.56 B64 3234422500 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Rocheleau-Oc)nnar:;,rfrust -f RESIDENTIAL Richardson Robert O;Patricia K __n B65 3234422600 $281.56 $281.56 1---- 1 RESIDENTIAL Heileman Michael C;Sheryl M B66 3234422700 $281.56 $281.56 ---- 1 RESIDENTIAL Carucci David S;Marcia L -- -- - B67 3234422800 $281.56 $281.56 B68 3234422900 1 -- RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Fische-r Trust f- 1 ~~ RESIDENTIAL $281.56 Kimberly-Kent E;Carolyn W B69 3234423200 $281.56_ B70 3234423300 --0 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $0.00 Kuebler Richard L RESIDENTIAL --- =~--~ B71 3234510100 1 $281.56 $281.56 Ziegler John P;Maria M ------- 1 RESIDENf~IAL Moss WilliamP-R;Dianna J---n B72 3234510200 $281.56 $281.56 1 RESIDENTIAL Williamson Stephen D; Jacquelin ---- B73 3234510300 $281.56 $281.56 B74 3234510400 --1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Smith John E;Angelica 0 1 ~~ RESIDENTIAL Elamparo Oscar E;Adelaida L B75 3234510500 $281.56 $281.56 1 RESIDENTIAL Dowd Michael C Jr & Robin E -- --- - B76 3234510600 $281.56 $281.56 i RESIDENTIAL -- Bryce William J; Deborah T m~ B77 3234510700 $281.56 $281.56 1 RESIDENTIAL ------------ B78 3234510800 $281.56 $281.56 Lenzner Lester R; Pat R ----- 1 RESIDENTIAL Squires Charles H -------- -- B79 3234510900 $281.56 $281.56 -- --- 1 RESIDENTIAL Puckett Trust - ____n______ B80 3234511000 - $281.56 $281.56 B81 3234511100 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Tomiyama Steven T;Akie-------------- 1--- 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 Klein Steven L;Mara F--m B82 3234511200 $281.56 1 RESIDENTIAL ~~ Flentie Pauline J Living Trust B83 3234511300 $281.56 $281.56 ---~- -RESIDENTIAL ~----~ B64 3234511400 $281.58 $281.56 Aguilar Leopoldo & Elizabeth ~~ 0 00 _____~_ ~ B85 3234511500 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Anastasia Robert D;Victoria L 1 - - RESIDENTiJ\L Long Kyle;Michelle-~ B86 3234511600 $281.56 $281.56 B87 3234511700 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Mendoza Aristeo L;Emma L I-- B88 3234511800 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $2!l1~__ Short James K;Sandra N B89 3234511900 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.58 Warsh-Jack;Galina B90 3234512000 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Murray Stlane A;Lorraine M B91 3234512100 ~~ 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Laliberte Wayne C; Kei 1 RESIDENTIAL Lopez Joseph E;Constance A -- - B92 3234512200 $281.56 $281.56 -- ~-~-~--- -~~- f-~3234512300 _ 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Campos Peter O;Linda M I- 1 RESIDENTIAL Minton Trust _____n__________ B94 3234512400 $281.56 $281.56 - ~ ~ ----------------- L-~~5 3234512500 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Greene Thomas; Charlene ---- -- Exhibit C2 - Assessment Roll City of Po way Landscape Maintenance District 86-28 86.2RoIl2006.xls f Exhibit C2 2 014 31812005 25 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item #....5.- Exhibit C2 - Assessment Roll City of Poway Landscape Maintenance District 86-28 Diagram Parcel FY2005/2006 Number Number Units landuse Unit Cost Assessment (1) OwnerName ------ 1 RESIDENTIAL Peters Keith D;Deborah L B96 3234512600 $281.56 $281.56 B97 3234512700 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Choukair John ------- ~----_.- B98 3234512800 1 . 'RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Harchol Richard M; Michelle B99 3234512900 .- -- 1 RESiDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Chin Richard; AnderSon-C B100 3234513000 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $2111-:56- t-s!<voretiOavid; Rhonda - - - 1 .--- -RESIDENTIAL I-Srown James J; Re-rle-eM----- B101 3234513100 $281.56 $281.56 B102' - f ----- RESIDENTIAL f-_. .-.-----. -- 3234513200 $281.56 $281.56 Chun Nathan B;Loan V U --- --3234513300 1 RESIDENTIAL .- frvforns RS; Kathleen B103 $281.56 $281.56 32345134()(j"--- -- B104 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Stearn Preston-S;-RObin R------ B105 3234513500 1 --RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Stone-Robert J;ManarlM B106 3234513600 1 RESiDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Hsiao Chang An;Ying Wang - -----------...--- -- B107-- -- 32345137()0 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 ----.- fr;;j.odalo"Daniel A;Lorelei F $281.56 - -- -j RESIDENTIAL TIatte Darrel; Nancy B108 3234513800 $281.56 $281.56 B109 3234513900 1 - -RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Kopperud H Scott;Laura B ------------..-- B110 3234514000 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Zynkian Ronald J;Deirdre L 1 --...- RESIDENTIAL SabourlnBrian JAaereniV'--- B111 3234514100 $281.56 $281.56 - 1 RESIDENTIAL Prior Mark D;Susan C B112 3234514200 $281.56 $281.56 1 ---- I--RESIDENTIAL Wexler Trust ---..----------- B113 3234514300 $281.56 $281.56 1 RESIDENTIAL ------- ~--- B114 3234514400 $281.56 $281.56 Norton Jeffrey A .-- 1 RESIDENTIAL Snow Trust 09-25-87 B115 3234514500 $281.56 $281.56 1 RESIDENTIAL ------- saenz Trust B116 3234514600 $281.56 $281.56 .-..... B117 3234514700 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Dressler Cary H;Jolie A B118 - 3234514800 1 "-RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Bonert Brian J ------------------ B119 3234514900 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Pon MichaeJ;Mary E -------- ----- B120 3234515000 1 --- RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Jain Trust ---------- B121 3234515100 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 ... $281.56 Leebolt Thomas P; Debra M -- ____________m__ - - ~ ---------.- B122 3234515200 1 RESIDENTIAL' . $281.56 $281.56 Johnston Jeffrey;Rosemary M -------- 1 RESIDENTIAL - ------------ Crabtree Joseph B;Karen B123 3234515300 $281.56 $281.56 B124 3234515400 1 . RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 -Brooks Charles-f;Oeborah-A- B125 3234515500 -- 1 RESiDENTIAL $281.56 Elizondo Richard A & Cythina R -- $281.56 B126 3234515600 1 RESIDENTIAL:" $281.56 $281.56 Bakalchuck Stewart M;Patricia J . B127 3234520100 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Sanjose Crispin S;Violeta S B128 3234520200 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 -- Minick Trusr-- B129 3234520300 - -1- I--RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Ohlson Janet R Trust - 1 RESIDENTIAL Chanock,"Pride Trust----- B130 3234520400 $281.56 $281.56 B131 3234520500 \---- f--RESIDENTIAL- $281.56 $281.56 GImenez Alain C; Mitzi J ----------------- -- - - - ----- RESIDENTIAL Crafts Robert Jr;Carol B - ----------------- B132 3234520600 1 $281.56 $281.56 .... B133 3234520700 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Pro-Tech Ventures Inc ----- -- ------ - 1 f- RESIDENTIAL Linares Luis -lIi;-Nadine M - B134 3234520800 $281.56 $281.56 B135 3234520900 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 'FleisChman Trust B136 3234521000 - - 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Bourget Trevor G;Michelle J - - - 1 - RESIDENTIAL Ingram Trust . .------- B137 3234521100 $281.56 $281.56 B138 3234521200 1 RESIDENTiAL $281.56 $281.56 Burke Stephen J ;Joan R B139 3234521300 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Wri9ht Family Trust 09-02-92 B140 3234521400 1 RE'SIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Ronees Leo A; Amaranta ..----.-- - j ---- RESIDENTIAL Jester Norman J; Hilary - ________m___ B141 3234521500 $281.56 $281.56 . . 1 RESIDENTIAL Dublada Ruperto E-;LuZviminda - B142 3234521600 $281.56 $281.56 B143 3234521700 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Godwin Family Trust 12-19--9-1 ---------- ----- - 86-2RoIl2006.xJs I Exhibit C2 3 of4 3/812005 26 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item #.....5..... Diagram Parcel FY2005/2006 Number Number Units Landuse Unit Cost Assessment (1) OwnerName -- ----,- RESIDENTIAL Gothani- Eric B;- Gabrielle ----- B144 3234521800 $281.56 $281.56 - -- . '--- T-- RESIDENTIAL ~ -- ------ B145 3234521900 $281.56 $281.56 Fabular Ronald T;lrma J L -1- - RESIDENTIAL Marston Vemard L;Delrey M ______n B146 3234522000 $281.56 $281.56 - - - - 1 -- - RESIDENTIAL Lynch Christopher D;Marla T ----- B147 3234522100 $281.56 $281.56 - 1 ~ESIDENTIAL Mccandless Michael L;Heldi E 1995 Reve __un B148 3234522200 $281.56 $281.56 8149 3234522300 1 RESIDENTIAL $281.56 Randhahn Trust --- -- $281_56 -----'-- 1 - RESIDENTIAL ~ -- ---- B150 3234522400 $281.56 $281.56 McCandless Richard; Kristin - -- - - -1 -- f-RESIDENTIAL FOSter Trusf--- -- B151 3234522500 $281.56 $281.56 -- 1- RESIDENTIAL -- Crawford Geoffrey E;Sharon B ----- B152 3234522600 $281.56 $281_56 f-- --- -- - - 1- RESIDENTIAL Riley Trust - B153 3234522700 $281.56 $281.56 - ~ ~ESIDENTIAL Bileckyj Family Living Trust ---- -- B154 3234522800 $281.56 $281.56 1- RESIDENTIAL ~-- ------ B155 3234522900 $281.56 $281.56 Reyes Ceasar D;Kristina B156 -- - 3234523000 --1 -RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Dalton Trust -- ___nn 1 - RE-SIDENTIAL --.- - -- B157 3234523100_ $281.56 $281.56 Jain Arjun D;Chhaya - - 3234523200 -1 - RESIDENTIAL ~"- --- -- B158 $281.56 _--.E81.56_ Lieu Vu H;Nguyet Nguyen B159 3234523300 1 - RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Percy Howard"R -- -1-- RESIDENTIAL -- - Gaswirth Alan J;Diane L ---- B160 3234523400 _ $281.56 _ $281.56 _ - ~- B161 _ 323452350~ t- 1- RESIDENTIAL $281.56 $281.56 Mumford Jay S;Nancy D ~. -- B162 3234523600 1 - RESIDENTIAL $281.56 ~1.56_ Mattson Kevin L;-Cindy L 1 - RESIDENTIAL 10-..-- -------- B163 3234523700 $281.56 $281.56 Hjalmarsen Mike;Frances -- ---- 1 - RESJDENTIAL Bastow Dale T;Marlys M ------ B154 _ 3234523800 _ $281.56 $281.56 - B165- -- 1 - c-RES1DENTIAL Mosher Brad K om -- 32.34523900 - $281.56 $281.56 -- - - 1-- -RESIDENTIAL ------ Delapena Santiago; Cora --- B166 3234524000 $281.56 $281.56 _ --- --1 ~ESIDENTIAL - 1.0.--- ------ B167 3234524100 $281.56 $281.56 Alexander Lany II TOTAL I 164 $46,175.84 II Exhibit C2 - Assessment Roll City of Poway Landscape Maintenance District 86-28 (1) Assessments rounded up to even cents. 86-2RoIl2006.xls I Exhibit C2 4 of4 31812005 27 of 27 April 26, 2005 Item # 5