Res 16-022 RESOLUTION NO. 16-022
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING THE INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN POWAY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT 86-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016/2017
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Poway desires to levy and collect
assessments within Poway Landscape Maintenance District 86-1 for the purpose of
maintaining, servicing, and operating public landscape facilities located within the
territory comprised of said district as shown in Exhibit A of the Engineer's Report that is
on file in the City Clerk's Office, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972,
and attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, assessments will not increase from the Fiscal Year 2015/2016
assessment rate of $243.04 per benefit unit for Zone A; and
WHEREAS, under Article XIII D, Section 4 of the California Constitution, a City
general benefit contribution has been calculated as the average General Fund
expenditure on a per square foot basis for the maintenance of landscaped medians and
right-of-ways. This general benefit contribution for Zone A, has been calculated to be
$44,539.92; and
WHEREAS, under Article XIII D, Section 5(b) of Proposition 218 (adopted by
general vote on November 5, 1996), the collection of Fiscal Year 2016/2017
assessments is exempt from the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4
of Article XIII D, in that the assessment was imposed pursuant to a petition signed by
the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the
assessment was initially imposed; and
WHEREAS, the public interest and convenience require the maintenance,
service, and operation of public landscaping and soundwalls within said territory.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Poway
as follows:
Section 1: The foregoing recitals are true and correct and the City Council so
finds and determines.
Section 2: Proposed assessments are as detailed in the Engineer's Report for
Poway Landscape Maintenance District No. 86-1 for Fiscal Year 2016/2017.
Section 3: Pursuant to the Streets and Highways Code, a public hearing will
be held on July 19, 2016 by the City Council to consider the levying and collection of the
proposed assessments.
Resolution No. 16-022
Page 2
Section 4: The City Clerk shall cause this Resolution to be published in the
Poway News Chieftain, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Poway.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Poway
at a regular meeting this 21st day of June 2016.
Steve Vaus, Mayor
ATTEST:
-7(/
Na feld&City Clerk
Y
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
I, Nancy Neufeld, CMC, City Clerk, of the City of Poway, do hereby certify under
penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 16-022 was duly adopted by the
City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on the 21st day of June 2016, and
that it was so adopted by the following vote:
AYES: GROSCH, MULLIN, CUNNINGHAM
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: VAUS
DISQUALIFIED: LEONARD
N 41ncy � Y Ne feld CMC Cit Clerk
City of Poway
City of Poway
Landscape Maintenance
District 86-1
2016/2017 ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT
INTENT MEETING: JUNE 21, 2016
PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 19, 2016
.755.6864
F 951.587.3510
www.willdan.com/financial
EXHIBIT A
Resolution 16-022
Page 3
Resolution 16-022 Page 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................... 1
A.INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1
B.COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION .............................................. 1
C.IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT ....................................... 2
II.DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT .................................................................... 3
A.BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT .................................................................... 3
B.DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS ...................................... 5
C.PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM IMPROVEMENTS ..................................... 5
III.METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ...................................................................... 6
A.GENERAL .......................................................................................................... 6
B.BENEFIT ANALYSIS .......................................................................................... 6
C.ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ...................................................................... 8
D.MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT RATE ...................................................................... 9
IV.DISTRICT BUDGETS ....................................................................................... 10
A.DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS ................................................................ 10
B.LMD 86-1 BUDGET .......................................................................................... 11
V.APPENDIX A - DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ..................................... 12
VI.APPENDIX B - 2016/2017 ASSESSMENT ROLL ............................................ 13
Resolution 16-022
Page 5
I. OVERVIEW
A. INTRODUCTION
The City of Poway (“City”) annually levies and collects special assessments in order to
maintain the improvements within the Landscape Maintenance District 86-1 (“District”)
formed June 12, 1986, pursuant to the City of Poway Resolution No. 00-034 (Policies for
Landscape Maintenance Districts) and the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of
Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”), in compliance with
California Constitution Article XIIID (“Article XIIID”). The 1972 Act and Article XIIID are
collectively referred to herein as “Assessment Law”.
This Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (“Report”) describes the District, any annexations, or
changes to the District including substantial changes to the District improvements, and the
proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2016/2017. The proposed assessments are based on
the estimated cost to maintain the improvements that provide special benefits to properties
within the District. The costs of improvements and the annual levy include all expenditures,
deficits, surpluses, revenues, and reserves. Each parcel is assessed proportionately for only
those improvements provided and for which the parcel receives benefit based on an
established method of apportionment.
The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned
its own Assessor’s Parcel Number by the County of San Diego (“County”) Assessor’s Office.
The County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers,
to identify on the tax roll, properties assessed for special district benefit assessments.
Following consideration of public comments and written protests at a noticed public hearing,
and review of the Report, the City Council may order amendments to the Report or confirm
the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report, and confirmation of the
assessments, the Council may order the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year
2016/2017 pursuant to the 1972 Act. In such case, the assessment information will be
submitted to the County Auditor/Controller, and included on the property tax roll for each
benefiting parcel for Fiscal Year 2016/2017.
B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION
Pursuant to the 1972 Act, the City Council annually conducts a public hearing to accept public
comments and testimony, and to approve the annual assessments to be levied on the County
tax roll for the fiscal year. All assessments contained in this Report and to be approved by
the City Council have been prepared in accordance with the 1972 Act and are in compliance
with the provisions of Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California (“Proposition
218”).
The City has reviewed the provisions of Article XIIID and has made the following findings and
determinations:
Pursuant to Article XIIID, Section 5, certain existing assessments are exempt from the
substantive and procedural requirements of Article XIIID, Section 4, and property owner
balloting for the assessments is not required until such time that the assessments are
increased. Since the District assessments were imposed pursuant to a petition signed by
Resolution 16-022
Page 6
the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessments at the time the assessments
were initially imposed, Article XIIID Section 5 (b) exempts the existing assessment amounts
(approved original assessment rates including any applicable annual escalation factor) from
the procedural requirements of Article XIIID, Section 4.
The provisions of Article XIIID do not alter the non-conflicting provisions of the 1972 Act. As
such, the method of apportionment described in this Report utilizes commonly accepted
assessment engineering practices consistent with the 1972 Act and the provisions of Article
XIIID. The proposed assessments for the current fiscal year are less than or equal to the
adjusted maximum assessment rate previously approved and adopted for the District. The
application of this adjusted maximum assessment rate for the various land uses within the
District is described in more detail in Section III D of this Report. Any proposed assessment
that exceeds the adjusted maximum assessment rate is considered an increased
assessment. Pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID, all new or increased assessments
(the incremental increase) are subject to both the substantive and procedural requirements
of Article XIIID, Section 4.
C. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT
As applicable or may be applicable to this proposed District, the 1972 Act defines
improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
The installation or planting of landscaping.
The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental
structures and facilities.
The installation or construction of public lighting facilities.
The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the
foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing
thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the
installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water,
irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities.
The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing.
The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this
section.
Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
The cost of preparation of the Report, including plans, specifications, estimates,
diagram, and assessment;
The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting and mailing of
notices;
Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments;
Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services;
Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and
servicing of the improvements;
Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section
22662.5; and,
Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased
assessment.
Resolution 16-022
Page 7
The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and
materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any
improvement, including:
Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement.
Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including
cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury.
The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste.
The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to
remove or cover graffiti.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT
A. BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT
The District Boundary Map and Assessment Diagram, which are incorporated herein by
reference and made a part of this Engineer’s Report, are on file with the Special Districts
Office of the Public Works Department of the City of Poway and are available for public
inspection during normal business hours.
On February 25, 1992, by Council Resolution No. 92-039, Landscape Maintenance District
86-1 (“District”) was divided into two subzones: 86-1 Zone A (“Zone A”) for residential and
86-1 Zone B (“Zone B”) for commercial. Assessments for LMD 86-1 Zone A will be calculated
on a per unit basis by dividing the required revenue by the total units within each district. The
Church of Latter Day Saints (“LDS Poway Chapel”) is the only parcel within LMD 86-1 Zone
B. By agreement, this parcel is maintained by the church for perpetuity at no cost to the
District.
Resolution 16-022
Page 8
District 86-1 Zone A (1,041 residential parcels assessed), includes:
Tract Project Name
TTMs 4090R, 4091R, 4092R, 4093R Bridlewood
TTM 3545 Piedmont Park
TTM 4158 Stone Canyon Ranch
TTM 11442 Lakeview Developers
TTM 84-08 The Grove
TTM 86-01 Huntington Gate, I and II
TTM 87-05 Serenata
TTM 88-15 Green Valley Estates
TTM 89-09 Williams Ranch
TTM 89-13 Old Coach Collection
TTM 89-13R The Heritage, Phase I, Unit I
TTM 89-13R(3) The Heritage, Phase I, Unit II
TTM 89-13R The Heritage, Phase I, Unit III
TTM 89-13R The Heritage, Phase I, Unit IV
TTM 97-04 Saddlebrook Estates
TTM 98-02 North Point
TTM 99-03 Vision Homes
TPM 86-05 Liu
TPM 87-05 Grimes
TPM 88-02 Jemy Corporation
TPM 93-06TE Liebrich
TPM 98-09 Rady
MDRA 99-188 Agee
TTM 85-03TE, Lot 26 Attanasio
TPM 02-02 Clark 888, Inc.
MDRA 98-71 Kennedy Family Trust
MDRA 01-38 Wells Trust
MDRA 02-11 Tyce
MDRA 03-11 Ricciardulli
MDRA 04-031 Moreno
MDRA 04-058 Gonzalez
MDRA 05-59 Garczynski
MDRA 04-02 Sedehi/Fard
TTM 00-02 Malone
MDRA 93-01R(3) Rickey
MDRA 07-35 Peart
TTM 02-01 BBA Partners
District 86-1 Zone B (one non-residential unit) consists of:
Tract Project Name
TPM 90-06 LDS Poway Chapel
Resolution 16-022
Page 9
B. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS
Facilities to be maintained by Zone A of the District are defined as landscape improvements
within the right-of-ways and open space areas associated with annexed subdivisions and
which are adjacent to portions of Espola Road, Titan Way, Painted Desert Road, Woodland
Parkway, Summer Sage Road, Lake Poway Road, Riparian Road, Sunset Drive, and Del
Poniente Road. The LDS Poway Chapel facilities within Zone B of the District are defined as
landscape improvements within the right-of-ways adjacent to the southeast corner of Espola
and Twin Peaks Roads.
Walls and fences adjacent to private property are to be maintained by the adjacent property
owners. The District/City, prior to commencement of work, shall approve repairs or
reconstruction of any walls or fences adjacent to the District landscape areas. Should the
property owners desire to include major repairs or reconstruction within the District’s
responsibilities, the property owners are required to submit a petition to initiate the balloting
process set forth in Article XIIID, Section 4.
Landscape maintenance performance standards and specifications have been developed by
the City to assure quality maintenance of landscape assessment district properties. A recent
evaluation of the level of quality has been conducted, and the current maintenance levels
meet the City's landscape maintenance standards.
C. PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM IMPROVEMENTS
The properties determined to receive benefit are those lots or parcels that, as a result of
development or redevelopment, finance, construct, install, and/or establish landscape
improvements within public right-of-ways or public easements (permanent public
improvement) or adjoining lots or parcels that, as a result of development or redevelopment,
receive access or are immediately adjacent to lots or parcels which contain landscape
improvements maintained by a landscape maintenance district.
Special benefit, as defined in the “Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972”, applicable provisions
of “Proposition 218”, and provisions of the “Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act”
(“Assessment Law”) and in this Report, shall be assessed to those properties determined to
receive special benefit from the District’s improvements.
Resolution 16-022
Page 10
III. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
A. GENERAL
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose
of providing certain public improvements that include the construction, maintenance and
servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further
requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than
assessed value:
The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be
apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among
all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by
each such lot or parcel from the improvements.
The formula used for calculating assessments in this District therefore reflects the
composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion
the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
In addition, Article XIIID requires that a parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable
cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Article XIIID provides that
only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from
the special benefits. A special benefit is a particular and distinct benefit over and above
general benefits conferred on the public at large, including real property within the district.
The general enhancement of property value does not constitute a special benefit.
B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS
Each of the improvements, the associated costs and assessments within the District has
been reviewed, identified and allocated based on the special benefit parcels receive from
such improvements pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID and the 1972 Act. All
improvements associated with this District have been identified as necessary, required
and/or desired for the orderly development of the properties within the District to their full
potential, consistent with the proposed development plans. As such, these improvements
would be necessary and required of individual property owners for the development of such
properties, and the ongoing operation, servicing and maintenance of these improvements
would be the financial obligation of those properties. Therefore, the improvements and the
annual costs of maintenance and operation of the improvements are of special benefit to the
properties.
All the lots or parcels are established at the same time once the conditions regarding the
improvements and the continued maintenance are met. As a result, each lot or parcel within
the District receives a special and distinct benefit from the improvements and to the same
degree.
Over time, the improvements continue to confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon
the lots or parcels within the District because of the nature of the improvements. The proper
maintenance of the improvements and appurtenant facilities reduces property related crimes,
especially vandalism, against properties in the District. All of the above mentioned factors
also contribute to a specific benefit to each of the parcels within the District.
Resolution 16-022
Page 11
The method of apportionment (method of assessment) is based on the premise that each
assessed parcel within the District receives benefit from the improvements. However, each
individual improvement element has its own distinct benefits both specific and general. The
special benefits associated with the improvements within the District are as follows:
Special Benefit
The special benefits associated with the landscaping improvements in the District are
specifically:
Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements;
Improved aesthetic appeal of properties providing a positive representation of the
area;
Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment
from adequate green space, open space areas and landscaping;
Environmental enhancement through improved erosion resistance, dust and
debris control, and fire prevention;
Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting from
well-maintained improvements associated with the properties;
Reduced criminal activity and property-related crimes (especially vandalism)
against properties in the District through well-maintained surroundings and
amenities including abatement of graffiti; and,
Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures,
providing oxygenation and attenuating noise.
General Benefit
Assessment Law mandates that the City assess for special benefit only, and the City
shall separate general benefit from special benefit. General benefit is defined as
services provided to the public-at-large. Special benefit is defined as services provided
at a level greater than the services provided to the public-at-large.
The City’s general benefit to the public-at-large is determined as the average
expenditure from the General Fund for the maintenance of landscaped medians and
right-of-ways, calculated on a per square foot basis. The City shall make a general
benefit contribution to a district based on the City’s average rate of expenditure from the
General Fund for the various types of improvements applied to the square footage of
similar types of improvements within the District.
No new improvements were added during Fiscal Year 2015/2016:
LANDSCAPE ELEMENT QUANTITY
Landscaped Right-of-Ways 370,369 Sq. Ft.
Landscaped Right-of-Ways with Soundwall 2,275 Sq. Ft.
Landscaped Median 8,929 Sq. Ft.
The City shall annually conduct an audit to determine the average expenditure from the
General Fund for the maintenance of landscape improvements within the public right-
Resolution 16-022
Page 12
of-ways or public easements, calculated on a per square foot basis. The general benefit
for Fiscal Year 2016/2017 is determined to be:
$0.2696 per square foot for landscape medians,
$0.1120 per square foot for landscape right-of-ways, and
$0.2863 per square foot for landscape right-of-ways with soundwall
As part of the audit, the City shall determine the average expenditure from the General
Fund for the maintenance of District landscape improvements. Based on an increase
of 1.45 percent in the San Diego Consumer Price Index (the average of All Urban
Consumers and Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers), comparable services
provided by the City of Poway staff for general landscape services, the general benefit
for Fiscal Year 2016/2017 will increase from Fiscal Year 2015/2016, based on the
contribution rate per square foot, at a maximum for this District:
Zone A
370,369 sq. ft. landscaped R/W X $0.1120 = $41,481.33
2,275 sq. ft. landscape R/W with soundwall X $0.2863 = $651.33
8,929 sq. ft. landscaped medians X $0.2696 = $2,407.26
All other maintenance, operation, administrative, and incidental costs which exceed the
City’s general benefit contribution to the public-at-large are of special benefit and
assessed to the District.
The City shall have an option as to how it will make the general benefit contributions to
the District. The City shall make its general benefit contribution by either:
providing irrigation water to the District for irrigation of LMD improvements in
an amount equal to the City’s general benefit contribution, or
paying directly to the District from the General Fund a dollar amount equal to
the City’s general benefit contribution.
C. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The total cost of special benefit for maintenance of the public improvements funded by the
District will be assessed to the various parcels in the District in proportion to the benefit units
assigned to each parcel, in relationship to the total benefit units assigned to all parcels being
assessed.
Residential Land Uses
All residential subdivisions shall be assessed proportional to special benefit received based
on one (1) benefit unit per residential dwelling unit.
Non-residential Land Uses
All non-residential parcels shall be assessed proportional to special benefit received based
on the average planned dwelling unit density throughout the urban areas of the City (four
dwelling units per acre), the equivalent of four (4) benefit units per acre.
Non-residential land uses typically provide services and/or employment opportunities for the
City that benefit all lands throughout the City. Since these non-residential land uses can
Resolution 16-022
Page 13
occur throughout the City, the planned, average density of residential dwelling units per acre
for the urban areas of the City has been calculated. The non-residential land uses are
considered to dislocate residential units. Therefore, the number of residential dwelling units
dislocated, based on the average dwelling units per acre, has been assigned to non-
residential lands. This method determines an equivalent benefit to residential land uses.
Appendix B details the calculation of the average residential units per acre planned within
the urban areas of the City. Urban areas have been defined as the parcels receiving water
and sewer services.
In-Lieu Assessments
Under provisions of City policy, parcels may contribute in-lieu assessments by providing
equivalent maintenance services for District improvements within public right-of-ways or
public easements immediately adjacent to their lands.
No new parcels within the District are scheduled to contribute in-lieu assessments in Fiscal
Year 2016/2017. Currently the Church of Latter Day Saints is the only property within the
District that has agreed to maintain the right-of-ways bordering their property for perpetuity.
Non-benefiting Parcels
All public and private streets, avenues, lanes, roads, drives, courts, alleys, all public
easements and right-of-ways, all dedicated open space parcels, and District maintained
parcels are determined to not receive special benefit from the District’s improvements and
are therefore not assessed. Currently the Church of Latter Day Saints is the only property
within the District that has agreed to maintain the right-of-ways bordering their property for
perpetuity.
Benefit Units (BUs)
As described above, the number of assessable benefit units attributable to each parcel
receiving special benefit has been calculated and can be found in the Assessment Roll
(Appendix B).
The assessment methodology utilized is as described above. Based on this methodology,
the benefit units, and the Fiscal Year 2016/2017 proposed assessment for each parcel were
calculated and are shown in the Assessment Roll (Appendix B).
The calculated Fiscal Year 2016/2017 assessment for Zone A is proposed to remain
at the Fiscal Year 2015/2016 assessment rate of $243.04 per benefit unit.
Zone B’s calculated Fiscal Year 2016/2017 assessment is proposed to remain at zero
dollars.
D. MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT RATE
The approved maximum assessment rate for the District was established and has remained
at $243.04 per benefit unit for Zone A. The District currently has no approved escalation
factor for increasing the maximum assessment rate for Zone A. The maximum assessment
rate establishes an approved upper limit on the annual assessment; however, the
assessment rate levied by the District may be less than the maximum amount in any given
year if not required to meet the budgetary needs for that year. If the long term budgetary
needs of the District would require an increase in the rate greater than the maximum
assessment rate in order to meet those needs, then any proposed increase in the maximum
Resolution 16-022
Page 14
assessment rate would require property owner balloting procedures as dictated by Article
XIIID.
IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS
A. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS
The 1972 Act provides that the estimated costs of the improvements shall include the total
cost of the maintenance and servicing of the improvements for the entire Fiscal Year
2016/2017, commencing July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017, including incidentals, which
may include reserves to operate the District.
The 1972 Act also provides that the amount of any surplus, deficit, or contribution be included
in the estimated cost of improvements. The net amount to be assessed on the lots or parcels
within the District is the total cost of maintenance and servicing with adjustments either
positive or negative for reserves, surpluses, deficits, and/or contributions.
Resolution 16-022
Page 15
B. LMD 86-1 BUDGET
BUDGET ITEMS
Fiscal Year
2014/2015(1)
Fiscal Year
2015/2016(2)
Fiscal Year
2016/2017(3)
EXPENDITURES:
Maintenance $134,658 $138,348 $173,738
Water/power 102,183 158,800 166,430
Administration(4) 41,573 41,980 40,970
Total Expenditures $278,414 $339,128 $381,138
REVENUES
City General Benefit Contribution $43,029 $43,903 $44,540
Assessment Revenue 253,332 253,005 253,005
Interest Revenue 1,918 2,310 2,310
Grant Revenue 0 0 0
Capital Project Closeout 0 0 0
Miscellaneous 0 0 0
Total Revenues $298,279 $299,218 $299,855
Total Number of Parcels 1,041
Total Parcels Levied 1,041
Total EBU's 1,041
Rate per EBU (Equivalent Benefit Units) $243.04
Maximum Rate per EBU $243.04
OPERATING RESERVE
Beginning Reserve Balance $153,693 $139,207 $169,564
Transfers In/Out (CIP) (34,351) 70,267 94,982
Reserve Fund Activity 19,865 (39,910) (81,283)
Estimated Ending Reserve Balance $139,207 $169,564 $183,263
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT RESERVE
CIP Fund Balance $130,898 $165,249 $94,982
CIP Transfers In/Out (Operating Reserve) 34,351 (70,267) (94,982)
CIP Projects 0 0 0
Estimated Ending CIP Reserve Balance $165,249 $94,982 $0
(1)Actual figures per Finance Fiscal Year 2014/2015 activity sheets.
(2)Approved budget.
(3)Proposed budget.
(4)Includes cost allocation City staff support services.
.
Resolution 16-022
Page 16
APPENDIX A - DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A District Diagram has been prepared for the District in the format required by the 1972 Act,
and is on file with the Special Districts Office of the Public Works Department, and by
reference is made part of this Report. The Assessment Diagram is available for inspection at
the Special Districts Office of the Public Works Department, during normal business hours.
Resolution 16-022
Page 17
V. APPENDIX B - 2016/2017 ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on
the County Assessor’s Map for the year in which this Report is prepared.
Non-assessable lots or parcels include land principally encumbered by public or utility rights-
of-way and common areas. These parcels will not be assessed.
A listing of parcels assessed within the District along with the proposed assessment amounts
has been identified as “Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Assessment Roll,” and is on file with the City
Clerk and is by reference made a part of this Report.
Resolution 16-022
Page 18
City of Poway
Landscape Maintenance
District 86-1
2016/2017 ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT
INTENT MEETING: JUNE 21, 2016
PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 19, 2016
.755.6864
F 951.587.3510
www.willdan.com/financial
EXHIBIT A
Resolution 16-022
Page 3
Resolution 16-022 Page 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................... 1
A.INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1
B.COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION .............................................. 1
C.IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT ....................................... 2
II.DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT .................................................................... 3
A.BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT .................................................................... 3
B.DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS ...................................... 5
C.PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM IMPROVEMENTS ..................................... 5
III.METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ...................................................................... 6
A.GENERAL .......................................................................................................... 6
B.BENEFIT ANALYSIS .......................................................................................... 6
C.ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ...................................................................... 8
D.MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT RATE ...................................................................... 9
IV.DISTRICT BUDGETS ....................................................................................... 10
A.DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS ................................................................ 10
B.LMD 86-1 BUDGET .......................................................................................... 11
V.APPENDIX A - DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ..................................... 12
VI.APPENDIX B - 2016/2017 ASSESSMENT ROLL ............................................ 13
Resolution 16-022
Page 5
I. OVERVIEW
A. INTRODUCTION
The City of Poway (“City”) annually levies and collects special assessments in order to
maintain the improvements within the Landscape Maintenance District 86-1 (“District”)
formed June 12, 1986, pursuant to the City of Poway Resolution No. 00-034 (Policies for
Landscape Maintenance Districts) and the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of
Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”), in compliance with
California Constitution Article XIIID (“Article XIIID”). The 1972 Act and Article XIIID are
collectively referred to herein as “Assessment Law”.
This Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (“Report”) describes the District, any annexations, or
changes to the District including substantial changes to the District improvements, and the
proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2016/2017. The proposed assessments are based on
the estimated cost to maintain the improvements that provide special benefits to properties
within the District. The costs of improvements and the annual levy include all expenditures,
deficits, surpluses, revenues, and reserves. Each parcel is assessed proportionately for only
those improvements provided and for which the parcel receives benefit based on an
established method of apportionment.
The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned
its own Assessor’s Parcel Number by the County of San Diego (“County”) Assessor’s Office.
The County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers,
to identify on the tax roll, properties assessed for special district benefit assessments.
Following consideration of public comments and written protests at a noticed public hearing,
and review of the Report, the City Council may order amendments to the Report or confirm
the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report, and confirmation of the
assessments, the Council may order the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year
2016/2017 pursuant to the 1972 Act. In such case, the assessment information will be
submitted to the County Auditor/Controller, and included on the property tax roll for each
benefiting parcel for Fiscal Year 2016/2017.
B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION
Pursuant to the 1972 Act, the City Council annually conducts a public hearing to accept public
comments and testimony, and to approve the annual assessments to be levied on the County
tax roll for the fiscal year. All assessments contained in this Report and to be approved by
the City Council have been prepared in accordance with the 1972 Act and are in compliance
with the provisions of Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California (“Proposition
218”).
The City has reviewed the provisions of Article XIIID and has made the following findings and
determinations:
Pursuant to Article XIIID, Section 5, certain existing assessments are exempt from the
substantive and procedural requirements of Article XIIID, Section 4, and property owner
balloting for the assessments is not required until such time that the assessments are
increased. Since the District assessments were imposed pursuant to a petition signed by
Resolution 16-022
Page 6
the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessments at the time the assessments
were initially imposed, Article XIIID Section 5 (b) exempts the existing assessment amounts
(approved original assessment rates including any applicable annual escalation factor) from
the procedural requirements of Article XIIID, Section 4.
The provisions of Article XIIID do not alter the non-conflicting provisions of the 1972 Act. As
such, the method of apportionment described in this Report utilizes commonly accepted
assessment engineering practices consistent with the 1972 Act and the provisions of Article
XIIID. The proposed assessments for the current fiscal year are less than or equal to the
adjusted maximum assessment rate previously approved and adopted for the District. The
application of this adjusted maximum assessment rate for the various land uses within the
District is described in more detail in Section III D of this Report. Any proposed assessment
that exceeds the adjusted maximum assessment rate is considered an increased
assessment. Pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID, all new or increased assessments
(the incremental increase) are subject to both the substantive and procedural requirements
of Article XIIID, Section 4.
C. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT
As applicable or may be applicable to this proposed District, the 1972 Act defines
improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
The installation or planting of landscaping.
The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental
structures and facilities.
The installation or construction of public lighting facilities.
The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the
foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing
thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the
installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water,
irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities.
The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing.
The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this
section.
Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
The cost of preparation of the Report, including plans, specifications, estimates,
diagram, and assessment;
The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting and mailing of
notices;
Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments;
Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services;
Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and
servicing of the improvements;
Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section
22662.5; and,
Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased
assessment.
Resolution 16-022
Page 7
The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and
materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any
improvement, including:
Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement.
Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including
cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury.
The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste.
The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to
remove or cover graffiti.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT
A. BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT
The District Boundary Map and Assessment Diagram, which are incorporated herein by
reference and made a part of this Engineer’s Report, are on file with the Special Districts
Office of the Public Works Department of the City of Poway and are available for public
inspection during normal business hours.
On February 25, 1992, by Council Resolution No. 92-039, Landscape Maintenance District
86-1 (“District”) was divided into two subzones: 86-1 Zone A (“Zone A”) for residential and
86-1 Zone B (“Zone B”) for commercial. Assessments for LMD 86-1 Zone A will be calculated
on a per unit basis by dividing the required revenue by the total units within each district. The
Church of Latter Day Saints (“LDS Poway Chapel”) is the only parcel within LMD 86-1 Zone
B. By agreement, this parcel is maintained by the church for perpetuity at no cost to the
District.
Resolution 16-022
Page 8
District 86-1 Zone A (1,041 residential parcels assessed), includes:
Tract Project Name
TTMs 4090R, 4091R, 4092R, 4093R Bridlewood
TTM 3545 Piedmont Park
TTM 4158 Stone Canyon Ranch
TTM 11442 Lakeview Developers
TTM 84-08 The Grove
TTM 86-01 Huntington Gate, I and II
TTM 87-05 Serenata
TTM 88-15 Green Valley Estates
TTM 89-09 Williams Ranch
TTM 89-13 Old Coach Collection
TTM 89-13R The Heritage, Phase I, Unit I
TTM 89-13R(3) The Heritage, Phase I, Unit II
TTM 89-13R The Heritage, Phase I, Unit III
TTM 89-13R The Heritage, Phase I, Unit IV
TTM 97-04 Saddlebrook Estates
TTM 98-02 North Point
TTM 99-03 Vision Homes
TPM 86-05 Liu
TPM 87-05 Grimes
TPM 88-02 Jemy Corporation
TPM 93-06TE Liebrich
TPM 98-09 Rady
MDRA 99-188 Agee
TTM 85-03TE, Lot 26 Attanasio
TPM 02-02 Clark 888, Inc.
MDRA 98-71 Kennedy Family Trust
MDRA 01-38 Wells Trust
MDRA 02-11 Tyce
MDRA 03-11 Ricciardulli
MDRA 04-031 Moreno
MDRA 04-058 Gonzalez
MDRA 05-59 Garczynski
MDRA 04-02 Sedehi/Fard
TTM 00-02 Malone
MDRA 93-01R(3) Rickey
MDRA 07-35 Peart
TTM 02-01 BBA Partners
District 86-1 Zone B (one non-residential unit) consists of:
Tract Project Name
TPM 90-06 LDS Poway Chapel
Resolution 16-022
Page 9
B. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS
Facilities to be maintained by Zone A of the District are defined as landscape improvements
within the right-of-ways and open space areas associated with annexed subdivisions and
which are adjacent to portions of Espola Road, Titan Way, Painted Desert Road, Woodland
Parkway, Summer Sage Road, Lake Poway Road, Riparian Road, Sunset Drive, and Del
Poniente Road. The LDS Poway Chapel facilities within Zone B of the District are defined as
landscape improvements within the right-of-ways adjacent to the southeast corner of Espola
and Twin Peaks Roads.
Walls and fences adjacent to private property are to be maintained by the adjacent property
owners. The District/City, prior to commencement of work, shall approve repairs or
reconstruction of any walls or fences adjacent to the District landscape areas. Should the
property owners desire to include major repairs or reconstruction within the District’s
responsibilities, the property owners are required to submit a petition to initiate the balloting
process set forth in Article XIIID, Section 4.
Landscape maintenance performance standards and specifications have been developed by
the City to assure quality maintenance of landscape assessment district properties. A recent
evaluation of the level of quality has been conducted, and the current maintenance levels
meet the City's landscape maintenance standards.
C. PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM IMPROVEMENTS
The properties determined to receive benefit are those lots or parcels that, as a result of
development or redevelopment, finance, construct, install, and/or establish landscape
improvements within public right-of-ways or public easements (permanent public
improvement) or adjoining lots or parcels that, as a result of development or redevelopment,
receive access or are immediately adjacent to lots or parcels which contain landscape
improvements maintained by a landscape maintenance district.
Special benefit, as defined in the “Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972”, applicable provisions
of “Proposition 218”, and provisions of the “Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act”
(“Assessment Law”) and in this Report, shall be assessed to those properties determined to
receive special benefit from the District’s improvements.
Resolution 16-022
Page 10
III. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
A. GENERAL
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose
of providing certain public improvements that include the construction, maintenance and
servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further
requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than
assessed value:
The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be
apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among
all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by
each such lot or parcel from the improvements.
The formula used for calculating assessments in this District therefore reflects the
composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion
the costs based on benefit to each parcel.
In addition, Article XIIID requires that a parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable
cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Article XIIID provides that
only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from
the special benefits. A special benefit is a particular and distinct benefit over and above
general benefits conferred on the public at large, including real property within the district.
The general enhancement of property value does not constitute a special benefit.
B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS
Each of the improvements, the associated costs and assessments within the District has
been reviewed, identified and allocated based on the special benefit parcels receive from
such improvements pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID and the 1972 Act. All
improvements associated with this District have been identified as necessary, required
and/or desired for the orderly development of the properties within the District to their full
potential, consistent with the proposed development plans. As such, these improvements
would be necessary and required of individual property owners for the development of such
properties, and the ongoing operation, servicing and maintenance of these improvements
would be the financial obligation of those properties. Therefore, the improvements and the
annual costs of maintenance and operation of the improvements are of special benefit to the
properties.
All the lots or parcels are established at the same time once the conditions regarding the
improvements and the continued maintenance are met. As a result, each lot or parcel within
the District receives a special and distinct benefit from the improvements and to the same
degree.
Over time, the improvements continue to confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon
the lots or parcels within the District because of the nature of the improvements. The proper
maintenance of the improvements and appurtenant facilities reduces property related crimes,
especially vandalism, against properties in the District. All of the above mentioned factors
also contribute to a specific benefit to each of the parcels within the District.
Resolution 16-022
Page 11
The method of apportionment (method of assessment) is based on the premise that each
assessed parcel within the District receives benefit from the improvements. However, each
individual improvement element has its own distinct benefits both specific and general. The
special benefits associated with the improvements within the District are as follows:
Special Benefit
The special benefits associated with the landscaping improvements in the District are
specifically:
Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements;
Improved aesthetic appeal of properties providing a positive representation of the
area;
Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment
from adequate green space, open space areas and landscaping;
Environmental enhancement through improved erosion resistance, dust and
debris control, and fire prevention;
Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting from
well-maintained improvements associated with the properties;
Reduced criminal activity and property-related crimes (especially vandalism)
against properties in the District through well-maintained surroundings and
amenities including abatement of graffiti; and,
Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures,
providing oxygenation and attenuating noise.
General Benefit
Assessment Law mandates that the City assess for special benefit only, and the City
shall separate general benefit from special benefit. General benefit is defined as
services provided to the public-at-large. Special benefit is defined as services provided
at a level greater than the services provided to the public-at-large.
The City’s general benefit to the public-at-large is determined as the average
expenditure from the General Fund for the maintenance of landscaped medians and
right-of-ways, calculated on a per square foot basis. The City shall make a general
benefit contribution to a district based on the City’s average rate of expenditure from the
General Fund for the various types of improvements applied to the square footage of
similar types of improvements within the District.
No new improvements were added during Fiscal Year 2015/2016:
LANDSCAPE ELEMENT QUANTITY
Landscaped Right-of-Ways 370,369 Sq. Ft.
Landscaped Right-of-Ways with Soundwall 2,275 Sq. Ft.
Landscaped Median 8,929 Sq. Ft.
The City shall annually conduct an audit to determine the average expenditure from the
General Fund for the maintenance of landscape improvements within the public right-
Resolution 16-022
Page 12
of-ways or public easements, calculated on a per square foot basis. The general benefit
for Fiscal Year 2016/2017 is determined to be:
$0.2696 per square foot for landscape medians,
$0.1120 per square foot for landscape right-of-ways, and
$0.2863 per square foot for landscape right-of-ways with soundwall
As part of the audit, the City shall determine the average expenditure from the General
Fund for the maintenance of District landscape improvements. Based on an increase
of 1.45 percent in the San Diego Consumer Price Index (the average of All Urban
Consumers and Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers), comparable services
provided by the City of Poway staff for general landscape services, the general benefit
for Fiscal Year 2016/2017 will increase from Fiscal Year 2015/2016, based on the
contribution rate per square foot, at a maximum for this District:
Zone A
370,369 sq. ft. landscaped R/W X $0.1120 = $41,481.33
2,275 sq. ft. landscape R/W with soundwall X $0.2863 = $651.33
8,929 sq. ft. landscaped medians X $0.2696 = $2,407.26
All other maintenance, operation, administrative, and incidental costs which exceed the
City’s general benefit contribution to the public-at-large are of special benefit and
assessed to the District.
The City shall have an option as to how it will make the general benefit contributions to
the District. The City shall make its general benefit contribution by either:
providing irrigation water to the District for irrigation of LMD improvements in
an amount equal to the City’s general benefit contribution, or
paying directly to the District from the General Fund a dollar amount equal to
the City’s general benefit contribution.
C. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The total cost of special benefit for maintenance of the public improvements funded by the
District will be assessed to the various parcels in the District in proportion to the benefit units
assigned to each parcel, in relationship to the total benefit units assigned to all parcels being
assessed.
Residential Land Uses
All residential subdivisions shall be assessed proportional to special benefit received based
on one (1) benefit unit per residential dwelling unit.
Non-residential Land Uses
All non-residential parcels shall be assessed proportional to special benefit received based
on the average planned dwelling unit density throughout the urban areas of the City (four
dwelling units per acre), the equivalent of four (4) benefit units per acre.
Non-residential land uses typically provide services and/or employment opportunities for the
City that benefit all lands throughout the City. Since these non-residential land uses can
Resolution 16-022
Page 13
occur throughout the City, the planned, average density of residential dwelling units per acre
for the urban areas of the City has been calculated. The non-residential land uses are
considered to dislocate residential units. Therefore, the number of residential dwelling units
dislocated, based on the average dwelling units per acre, has been assigned to non-
residential lands. This method determines an equivalent benefit to residential land uses.
Appendix B details the calculation of the average residential units per acre planned within
the urban areas of the City. Urban areas have been defined as the parcels receiving water
and sewer services.
In-Lieu Assessments
Under provisions of City policy, parcels may contribute in-lieu assessments by providing
equivalent maintenance services for District improvements within public right-of-ways or
public easements immediately adjacent to their lands.
No new parcels within the District are scheduled to contribute in-lieu assessments in Fiscal
Year 2016/2017. Currently the Church of Latter Day Saints is the only property within the
District that has agreed to maintain the right-of-ways bordering their property for perpetuity.
Non-benefiting Parcels
All public and private streets, avenues, lanes, roads, drives, courts, alleys, all public
easements and right-of-ways, all dedicated open space parcels, and District maintained
parcels are determined to not receive special benefit from the District’s improvements and
are therefore not assessed. Currently the Church of Latter Day Saints is the only property
within the District that has agreed to maintain the right-of-ways bordering their property for
perpetuity.
Benefit Units (BUs)
As described above, the number of assessable benefit units attributable to each parcel
receiving special benefit has been calculated and can be found in the Assessment Roll
(Appendix B).
The assessment methodology utilized is as described above. Based on this methodology,
the benefit units, and the Fiscal Year 2016/2017 proposed assessment for each parcel were
calculated and are shown in the Assessment Roll (Appendix B).
The calculated Fiscal Year 2016/2017 assessment for Zone A is proposed to remain
at the Fiscal Year 2015/2016 assessment rate of $243.04 per benefit unit.
Zone B’s calculated Fiscal Year 2016/2017 assessment is proposed to remain at zero
dollars.
D. MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT RATE
The approved maximum assessment rate for the District was established and has remained
at $243.04 per benefit unit for Zone A. The District currently has no approved escalation
factor for increasing the maximum assessment rate for Zone A. The maximum assessment
rate establishes an approved upper limit on the annual assessment; however, the
assessment rate levied by the District may be less than the maximum amount in any given
year if not required to meet the budgetary needs for that year. If the long term budgetary
needs of the District would require an increase in the rate greater than the maximum
assessment rate in order to meet those needs, then any proposed increase in the maximum
Resolution 16-022
Page 14
assessment rate would require property owner balloting procedures as dictated by Article
XIIID.
IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS
A. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS
The 1972 Act provides that the estimated costs of the improvements shall include the total
cost of the maintenance and servicing of the improvements for the entire Fiscal Year
2016/2017, commencing July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017, including incidentals, which
may include reserves to operate the District.
The 1972 Act also provides that the amount of any surplus, deficit, or contribution be included
in the estimated cost of improvements. The net amount to be assessed on the lots or parcels
within the District is the total cost of maintenance and servicing with adjustments either
positive or negative for reserves, surpluses, deficits, and/or contributions.
Resolution 16-022
Page 15
B. LMD 86-1 BUDGET
BUDGET ITEMS
Fiscal Year
2014/2015(1)
Fiscal Year
2015/2016(2)
Fiscal Year
2016/2017(3)
EXPENDITURES:
Maintenance $134,658 $138,348 $173,738
Water/power 102,183 158,800 166,430
Administration(4) 41,573 41,980 40,970
Total Expenditures $278,414 $339,128 $381,138
REVENUES
City General Benefit Contribution $43,029 $43,903 $44,540
Assessment Revenue 253,332 253,005 253,005
Interest Revenue 1,918 2,310 2,310
Grant Revenue 0 0 0
Capital Project Closeout 0 0 0
Miscellaneous 0 0 0
Total Revenues $298,279 $299,218 $299,855
Total Number of Parcels 1,041
Total Parcels Levied 1,041
Total EBU's 1,041
Rate per EBU (Equivalent Benefit Units) $243.04
Maximum Rate per EBU $243.04
OPERATING RESERVE
Beginning Reserve Balance $153,693 $139,207 $169,564
Transfers In/Out (CIP) (34,351) 70,267 94,982
Reserve Fund Activity 19,865 (39,910) (81,283)
Estimated Ending Reserve Balance $139,207 $169,564 $183,263
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT RESERVE
CIP Fund Balance $130,898 $165,249 $94,982
CIP Transfers In/Out (Operating Reserve) 34,351 (70,267) (94,982)
CIP Projects 0 0 0
Estimated Ending CIP Reserve Balance $165,249 $94,982 $0
(1)Actual figures per Finance Fiscal Year 2014/2015 activity sheets.
(2)Approved budget.
(3)Proposed budget.
(4)Includes cost allocation City staff support services.
.
Resolution 16-022
Page 16
APPENDIX A - DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A District Diagram has been prepared for the District in the format required by the 1972 Act,
and is on file with the Special Districts Office of the Public Works Department, and by
reference is made part of this Report. The Assessment Diagram is available for inspection at
the Special Districts Office of the Public Works Department, during normal business hours.
Resolution 16-022
Page 17
V. APPENDIX B - 2016/2017 ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on
the County Assessor’s Map for the year in which this Report is prepared.
Non-assessable lots or parcels include land principally encumbered by public or utility rights-
of-way and common areas. These parcels will not be assessed.
A listing of parcels assessed within the District along with the proposed assessment amounts
has been identified as “Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Assessment Roll,” and is on file with the City
Clerk and is by reference made a part of this Report.
Resolution 16-022
Page 18