Loading...
Minutes 2017 05-15CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE BUDGET REVIEW COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING May 15, 2017 The May 15, 2017, Regular Meeting of the Budget Review Committee was called to order at 6:03 p.m. by Peter Murray at the Poway City Council Chambers Observation Room, 13325 Civic Center Drive, Poway, California. COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT Richard Ball, Marc Hennen, Peter Murray, Kevin Ogden, Torrey Powers COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT None. STAFF MEMBERS PRESENTS Tina White, City Manager Wendy Kaserman, Assistant City Manager Peter Moote, Acting Director of Finance Robin Bettin, Director of Community Services Belinda Romero, Community Services Manager Mike Obermiller, Director of Public Works Eric Heidemann, Assistant Director of Public Works for Maintenance Operations PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. Approval of Minutes — May 8, 2017 Meeting A motion was made by Torrey to approve the minutes, seconded by Kevin and carried unanimously. 2. Department Budget Review — Community Services Robin distributed copies of the Community Services Department Overview handout and spoke on the department's mission, division programs, and budget proposals for the new fiscal year. Committee members and staff discussed the potential to increase City revenue, particularly with existing subsidies and cost-sharing agreements. In response to Committee inquiry, Robin described the process for field rentals and determining low -high priority users. Per request, a matrix of sports field facility rental fees, and updated cost -recovery graph with prior years' comparative data, will be provided by staff at the May 17 meeting. 3. Department Budget Review — Public Works Copies of the department organization chart were distributed to Committee members and staff. Mike provided an overview of the department divisions and participation in the Metro Wastewater Joint Powers Authority. Committee members and staff discussed existing and upcoming legislation that largely influence the department's operations. Page 2 — BUDGET REVIEW COMMITTEE Tina noted the possibility of a balloting process over a multi-year program that will either increase or reduce the level of service within Landscape Maintenance Districts. Eric described the use of cooperative -purchasing programs for anticipated capital equipment replacements. 4. Budget Review — Fund Schedules Peter distributed copies of the City's General Fund Reserve Policy and fund activity detail schedules. Kevin commended staff on great forward planning reflected in the schedules. In response to Marc's request for further details on the City's debt, Peter explained that most debt is for former Redevelopment Agency (Successor Agency) bond issues for capital improvements, with other debt comprised of the Sheriff's station COPS and City Hall. S. Fiscal Forecast for the General Fund Peter discussed the purpose of the long-term forecast for the General Fund, explaining that it is used as a planning tool to ensure fiscal sustainability and continuity of operations supported by the General Fund. The updated forecast, which will be provided to the Committee at their meeting on May 17, will demonstrate that without continuous adjustments, operating expenditures show the potential to exceed projected revenues in the out -years. Peter explained that this is not an uncommon result for the forecast and adjustments to expenditures, including staffing levels, have been made in the past as needed to prevent an unbalanced fiscal year from ever occurring. Staff noted that the General Fund Reserve Policy, together with Debt Policy, are consistent with the City's past practices, but formalized by Council action in 2017 to ensure optimal rates when issuing debt. Committee members and staff discussed the City's compensation history and employee benefit impacts to the budget. 6. Discussion — Annual Report of Recommendations to the City Council Chairman Peter requested input from the Committee on whether the final scheduled meeting will be sufficient to finalize the report to Council; members unanimously agreed to keep the May 17 meeting on calendar, and that future meetings can be scheduled if needed. In response to Committee inquiry, Peter confirmed that the members' discussions have been consistent with the Committee's charterlmission, which includes providing valuable input from a resident's perspective. Tina reminded the Committee that the formattreadability of the budget materials also falls under their purview, and encouraged the Committee to reinforce the General Fund Reserve Policy if members support it. 7. Chair and Committee Member Initiated Items None. ADJOURNMENT Peter Murray adjourned the meeting at 9:35 p.m. Je ny Paglinawan Sr. Administrative Assistant