Item 28A - PDC - Carriage Lane CondominiumsMembers of the City Council
Carl R. Kruse, Mayor
June 3, 1986
Pre Devel o ment Conference Carriage Lane Condominiums
a request from IAM. Development for a pre-develo hent conference. If
it will be scheduled for the June 12th snrorkshop.
TO
FROM:
AGENDA REPORT
CITY OF POWAY
Iffirsissmartmaimmas
yF
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
James L. Bowersox, City Manager?,
INITIATED BY: Reba W. Touw, Director of Planning S rvices
James H. Lyon, Assistant Planner
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ABSTRACT
Location:
-Gross
Acreage:
Surrounding
Land Use:
Slope:
General Plan
and Zoning:
June 12, 1986
Pre-Develo.ment Conference Anal sis for Carria
e
1N
Lane Condominiums -IAM Development, Applicant
THE
Consideration of a request to construct a 120 unit
condominium project
Northeast corner of the intersection of Poway and
Carriage Roads
11.9 acre
c
The property to the north is zoned for single family
residential. A 7 -Eleven convenience store is located
to the west, an ARCO AM -PM minimart to the south,
and Wendy's restaurant is located adjacent to the
east boundary.
Previous grading has established cut banks. There is
a 25 foot elevational change from Poway Road to the
plateau equal to 57% slope. From the plateau to the
top of an adjoining hill there is a 107 foot ele-
vational difference equal to a 36% slope.
The subject site is zoned Residential Condominium
Properties to the north are zoned RS -7 with those on
the east, west, and south zoned for General
Commercial uses. There is also a small section of RA
zoned property to the northwest.
ACTION:
JUN 3 1986 ITEM 23/1_
2 of 9
JUN 3 1986 I T F A4
^. June 12,
1986
Page 2
History:
Tentative Map 4180 was approved by the County of San
Diego in October 1980 and revised in 1982. As part
of the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in 1983 the
zoning was changed from RV.; -3 and RV-iO (Resiciential
Variable) to RC (Residential Condominium). The
approved tentative map included a conditional use
permit for a 71 unit condominium'projectd for the
site. A third time extension for the tentative map
was denied in December 1984..With the denial of the
map, the Conditional Use Permit 82-02 for the project
also expired. The site has been previously graded
creating an elogated plateau parallel to Poway Road
and Carriage Road which is suitable for development.
A large hillside extends to the east from this pla-
teau area and was designated as open space under the
now expired tentative map and conditional use permit.
Zoning:
The Code provides for a maximum of 7-12 units per net
acre. The gross acreage of -the site- is 11.9 acres.
The net acreage, inclusive of slopes, is calculated
to be _10.63 acres. This acreage would conceptually
support upoto 127_ condominium units at a maximum den-
sity of 12 units per acre. If the slopes were
removed from the net acreage, there appears to be
approximately 4.5 acres of flat developable area. A
maximum of 54 units could be considered on the 4.5
acres._ A 54 foot setback is required from any'single
family zone when the proposed building exceeds 15
feet in height. An eight foot high block wall is
required on the boundary line between the two zones.
Building heights are limited to 2 stories or 35 feet
whichever' is less. On-site parking is based on the
number of bedrooms with a minimum one garage space
per bedroom. On-site improvements such as a swimming
pool, childrens play areas, and park -like quiet areas
are also required. All existing slopes must be
landscaped with trees, shrubs, and groundcover.
General
Plan:
Due to the high visability of the project site,
-
future structures should be constructed in anon
obntrusive manner and painted in earthtone colors to
minimize the visual impact.
JUN 3 1986 I T F A4
r
June 12,
3
1986
Page
Summary:
The project site was originally divided into three
lots with Lot 31 consisting of 3.5 acres, placed. in
open space to protect the hillside. Sierra Pac.fc,
the previous 'owner of the property had intended to,
build the approved 71 unit condominium project but
never moved forward with the project. The map is no
.longer active and any new development would require
the approval of a tentative mapr and a development
}
review.
JLB:RWT:JHL:js
Attachments:
1.,
Applicants Letter',
2.
Agreement of understanding
1
3.
SitePlan
4.
Building Elevations
5.
Surrounding Zoning and General P.1an
:i
JUN 3 1966 ITE M 21
4of 9
V61%VrN SAN DIEGO
4845 Ronson Cour
San Diego. California 92111
(619) 292=1040
ApriT 14, 1986 Job No. 5520-002
EC F' V -ile (3) (P-3)
APS I 'r iib®
Ms. Reba W. Touw
Director of 'P1 anni ng Services PLANNING DERAR
City -of Poway RENT
P. 0. Box 789
Poway, CA 92064
RE Predevel opment Conference for IAM Development at the Northeast Corner
of Poway Road and Carriage Road
Dear Reba:
We are requesting this predevelopment conference on behalf of our Client,
IAM Development, because of the unique nature of the subject site.. IAM
Development proposes to construct 120 multiple family units on the subject
property. He will meet all standards of the Residential Condominium zone and
of the General Plan for the property. No variances are expected,
He has taken great effort to design a development which blends with,: the topo-
graphy of the site and does not require any grading or re -grading of the
existing onsite slopes. The Client proposes a heavily landscaped site. The
units proposed are similar in architecture to the Willow Apartment project on
Hillary and 'Midland Road. The proposed colors of the buildings are muted tones
of brown and tarn in order to blend the development into the hillside. Roof
material wi T l be a fl at' dank brown colored concrete tile that wool d resemble
III
wood shake. Access to the development would. be through a new street intersect-
ing with Carriage Road. The existing stub street from the residential single
family subdivision would not be carried through as an access to the develop-
ment except perhaps for emergency vehicle purposes.
We trust that you will find the development acceptable and one that meets the
standards of the Residential Condominium zone and land use: Should you have
any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to. contact me or the Client.
Very truly yours,
UT SOUT WEST, INC.
B rr K. gan
I c or f P nni ng
BKH/l h
cc Bill Kintzele, IAM Development
- ATTACHMENT 1
C'f
ENGINEERS p► k NNERS SURVEYORS
JUN 31986 ITEM �,�
CF UNDERSTANDnrz _
City Council for the City of Poway, hereinafter referred to as "Cityn and
ImA I C-Loat , hereinafter referred to as "Proponent"
enter into this Agreement of Understanding based upon the following facts:
Proponent owns or has an equitable interest in land described by tax
assessor's parcel number ( s) 31-7 -010- kAr o 4
Proponent des res_to develop this property in accordance with the will of the
City and without the expense of a protracted development.
City is concerned that Proponent will create development plans unsatisfac-
tory to City and consume timal and effort of City eoployees needlessly on
unsatisfactory developuent plans unless City assists in directing Proponent.
Based upon the above --mentioned. facts, City will cjrant Proponent. -a hearing
prior to filing any application for development upon the following understand-
. .
A• City will render no decision with regards to any development proposal
or part thereof.
B. City will receive no evidence, specific in nature, in support of. a
particular development plan, -
C. City will mike no representations that will obligate the: City to render
i a decision in favor of or against any develott proposal or part
thereof Proponent may subsequently SUbMit.
D. If any development proposal is subsequently submitted, Proponent will
proceed at its sole and exclusive risk with the understanding that City
has made no representations upon which Proponent may rely.
Dated. �' i� �� Proponent:
S e
{
z
R
��'�` I-
6 of 9 JUN
UN....eTat
04-M. M 1N1001
•• • 1 • OF MY: UNITS
110 TOTAL UNIT.
PARKING'
M �� �J�`T'i •
•
•' ! + ,%�/LI* _ •►ter %r�aim* s■eriwite wll�wwwlmar11111111161.11111111111111111111•11111 ;l
ra
aIMOD.s
o0 POWAY ROAD
y
e '
w i
J Y3 :Y .f W� ���• �•J GAP f<` � j�.t{uO �R,� J �!•'-
o- Yt! .. � a fA'YnSF !'/E``� ,> c ..t ^ka 3••c� � �.
RS
• -. Thr w fl�� ++ fa .�,J.r xdr _ � } �C
®C o a ✓ v a�lr g k. 3ff ti f> # i•6<e»s rr v +ar:
S a ryi,�., ya�%i•1 >t�; '<! t'� , r 'a
y+ w t•
cCn
-S S -� ry iii >[ t cc
RS
CG
! >R A RA VS
S ..
4
�.. •€♦ BPt• - a ;s.i i e: 45,. • ♦ ♦ • '�•�•�i� iP'F•��'.
e I•nr t x
� :;ro, ,, �a • ,;�: iat • s �,. •••- � +I►•ss i.i • s e rr s I F�. � s' � t
�• • or .; , s, 1 •. �:i ` • ii • e ,i s • •i«• •ate ♦f+►
f t • fie• ic♦ s. •� i aisIt A .A-. `. :e l .i,;y L
f• �•�•N•a •_ .s
%Y
Ai
d
jjj
j �o,m•� ;e'er * •s 1 +�t� ••
f i►s. y
alts xi^ • •t a.'*-. t1
♦* s: •a••s••• • a
i
is
r
{
i
CITY OF POA
ITEM
TITLE ®N
SCALE ATTACHMENT
9 of 9 JUN 3 1986 ITEM 27