Item 2 - PDC for Carriage Lane Condominium-ISM Development. s
f
�/A�� RR
_ A��A R��®.:i f! -t - OF
CITY OF POWAY
- T
tiF i'.M.s.a i,w
C� IN THE C�
TO Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James L. Bowersox, City Mana
INITIATED BY: Reba W. Touw, Director of P ing S rvic-�V
es
James H. Lyon, Assistant Planner
DATE: June 12, 1986_
SUBJECT: Pre -Development Conference Analysis for Carriage
Lane Condominiums -IAM Development, Applicant
ABSTRACT Consideration of a request to construct a 120 unit
condominium project.
Location: Northeast corner of the intersection of Poway and
Carriage Roads
Gross
Acreage: 11.9 acre
Surrounding
Land Use: The property to the north is Zoned for single family
residential. A 7 -Eleven convenience store is located
to the west, an ARCO AM -PM minimart to the south,
and Wendy's restaurant is located adjacent to the
east boundary.
Slope: Previous grading has established cut banks There is
a'25 foot elevational change from Poway Road to the
plateau equal to 57% slope. From the plateau to the
top of an adjoining hill there is a 107 foot ele-
vational difference equal to a 36% slope.
General Plan
and Zoning: The subject site is zoned Residential Condominium
Properties to the north are zoned RS -7 with those on
the east, west, and south Zoned for General
Commercial uses. There is also a small section of RA
zoned property to the northwest.
LK-
Concurred'to hear at worktop 6-12-86 'nn.
PfWahs e�� n
JUN 12- 1996 ITEM
JUN 3 1986 ITEM
k(
y : p;
June 12, 1986
Page 2
History: Tentative Map 4180 was approved by the County of San {
Diego in October 1980 and revised in 1902. As part
of the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in 1983 the
zoning was changed from -RV -3 and RV -10 (Residential
is Variable) to RC (Residential Condominium) The
approved tentative map included a conditional use
g
permit for a 71 unit condominium projectd for the
site. A third time extension. for the tentative map
was denied in, December 1984. With the denial of the
map, the Conditional Use Permit 82-02 for the project
also expired. The site has been previously graded
creating an elogated plateau parallel to Poway Road
and Carriage Road which is suitable for development.
a
A large hillside extends to the east from this pla-
teau area and was designated as open space under the
now expired tentative map and conditional use permit.
Zoning: The Code provides for a maximum of 7-12 units per net ..
acre. The gross acreage of the site is 11.9 acres.
The net acreage, inclusive of slopes, is calculated
to be 10.63acres Thisacreagewould conceptually
support up to 127 condominium units at a maximum den-
sity of 1.2 units per acre. If the slopes were
removed from the net acreage, there appears to be
approximately 4.5 acres of flat developable area A
maximum of 54 units could be considered on the 4.5 '
acres. A 50 foot setback is required from any single
family zone when the proposed building exceeds 15
feet in height. An eight foot high block wall is
required on the boundary line between the two zones.
Building heights are limited to 2 stories or 35 feet
whichever is less. On-site parking is based on the
number of bedrooms with a minimum one garage space
per bedroom. On-site improvements such as a swimming
pool, chi.ldrens play areas, and park -like quiet areas
are also required. All existing slopes must be
landscaped with trees, shrubs, and groundcover
General
Plan: Due to the high visability of the project site,
future structures should be constructed in a non
obstrusive manner and painted in earthtone colors to
minimize the visual impact.
JUN 12 1986 ITEM
2 of 8
JUN 3 1986 1 Tq
June 12,
1986
r ,
Page 3
Summary:
The project site was originally divided into three
lots with Lot 3, consisting of 3.5 acres, placed in
open space to protect the hillside. Sierra Pacific,'
the previous owner of the property had intended to
build the approved 71"unit condominium project but
never moved forward with the project. The map is no #`
longer active and any new development would require
the approval of a tentative map, and a development
review, y
JLB`:RWT:JHL:js
f
Attachments: :.
1.
Applicants Letter
2.
Agreement of Understanding _;I
3.
Site Plan
4.
Building Elevations
5.
Surrounding Zoning and General Plan
,JUN 12 )986 ITEM
JUN 3 1986 ITEM
f 3 or 8
V
Y6T�'N SAN AIiT DIEGQ
4845 Ronson Court
San Diego. California 92111
(619) 292-1040
April 14, 1986 Job No. 5520-002
C F' V E E 1e .(3) (P-3)
h�
�1 APR 17 19r�
Ms. Reba W. Touw 4
Director of -Planning
<< of Pl anni n9 Services PLONING DEPARTMENT
-
City of Poway
P. 0. Box 789
Poway, CA 92064
RE: Predevelopment Conference for IAM Development at the Northeast Corner
of Poway Road and Carriage Road
Dear Reba:
We are requesting this predevel opment conference on behalf of our Client,
IAM Development, because of the unique nature of the subject site._ IAM
Development proposes to construct 120 multiple family units on the subject
property. He will meet all standards of the Residential Condominium zone and
of the General Plan for the ' property. No variances are expected'. .'
X4 .
He has taken great effort to design a development which blends with the topo-
graphy
opo graphy of the site and does not require any grading or re -grading of the
{ existing onsite slopes. The Client_ proposes a heavily landscaped site. The
units proposed are simiia"r in architecture to the Willow Apartment project on
{ Hillary and Midland Road. The proposed colors of the buildings are muted tones
of brown and tan in order to blend the development into the hillside. Roof
material will be a flat, dark brown colored concrete tile that would resemble
wood shake. Access to the development would be through a new street_intersect-
ing with Carriage Road. The existing stub street from the residential single
family subdivision would not be carried through as an access to the develop-
ment except perhaps for emergency vehicle purposes.
We trust that you will find the development acceptable and one that meets the
standards of the Residential Condominium zone and land use. Should you have
any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me or the Client.
Very truly yours,
A
UT EST, INC.K. �ganor a1T P nni ng
BKH/l h
cc: Bill Ki ntzel e, IAM Development
4 of 8 ATTACHMENT 1
JUN 12 1986 ITEM 2
y ENGINEERS PL-kNN RS SURVEYORS
JUN 3 1986 ITEM . art
ACML
r
OF UI11i}ERSrAMII
s
City Council for the City of Poway, hereinafter referred to as "City" and
IASia'1P , hereinafter referred to as "Proponent"s
enter into -this Agreement of Understanding based upon the following facts:
Proponent owns or has an equitable interest in land described, by tax
i
assessor's parcel number(s) 31-7 --De O _3q � n 46
Proponent desires to develop this prooerty in accordancewith the will of the
City and without the expense of a protracted development.
City is concerned that Proponent will create development pians unsatisfac-
tory to City and consume time and effort of City employees needlessly on
unsatisfactory develon�nent plans unless City assists in directing Proponent.
Based upon the above-aentioned facts, City will grant Proponent a hearing
prior to filing any application for development upon, the following understand-
ing
A. City will render no decision with regards to any development proposal
or part: thereof.
B. City will receive no evidence, specific in nature, in support of a.
particular development plan.
C. City will Hake urn representations that will obligate the City
to render
a decision in favor of or against any development proposal: or part
thereof Proponent imy subsequently submit.
D If any deveiopnent proposal is subsequently submitted, Proponent will
proceed at its sole and exclusive risk with the understanding that City
has rmde no representations upon which Proponent may rely.
Dated: Proponent: (A4. �Nf�dc
r $ gna e 0
G
i
JUN' 12 1986 IT EM 2
j 5 of $SUN' 198��T 2
CO
z
w
jp
C]IJdti�rdll�eLrl V1 UNLiiiRSTA1.YLJ=
t
City Council for the City of Poway, hereinafter referred to as "Citya and
IAS p , hereinafter referred to as "Proponent"
enter into this Agreement of Understanding based upon the following facts:
Proponent owns or has an equitable interest in land described by tax,
assessor's parcel number (s) 1311
-77010 -'3q A. n b
Proponent desires to develop this property in accordance with the will of the
Cit and without the
Y expense of a protracted development.
City is concerned that Proponent will create development pians unsatisfac-
tory to City and consume time and effort of City employees needlessly on
unsatisfactory development plans unless: City assists in directing Proponent.
Based upon the above-mentioned facts, City will grant
Proponent a hearing
prior to filingany application for &vel
a --
1.
r.: ,.
S... t Jf3 ;j3 i #jt M7+r 'rf�i. 'ir�r , #rt'�iifi i K�{{';� .h., ,•• RR� • � �%�'3 � f. xYV
r f' !,r�•r, i. . � � - ;y'4'��X r is _ _. �. 32:ni% r ��` J ' t%
ii
i ®s f r•� r, J ° �ayyY /�•'� rr ,ir t v. +.. .,i+.;.v,.'�•�xs ,� r �i yo+rC �•
r f:!rS...G •�j r 4rri/Y•` ff' 'f s ...:r yy`' �'
1 _ ., r/,{fry yC• }CG., •
'tom•°'
i.. r. • ry.• CM ^' x cc
c® (, L r
' , _ �O iq, 9'mf�J�`:�`gi WRw.T Jfa;..
t
♦`# � <� '� a �<��.e r w `ti ,. s .�i% �' + �,�,�g�f:ft�� s
os
x• r� o7t�r+ x0 Y f G # e y 'V'�..� if#'! � .
e� tea• o>,cf�11^c! <; i i #rAv# s n s
a i•• a C�w.� R b s ^.� �. ♦ tax s • � }i • i r • wt fs s4 s <' �.
•' • •, > <� a.. « • y� t r a�"•'Rr#dli�: o��% .e i•#y# �I"r A � '�` ♦: �."� • .lw. n.�t ' �. .
®• . �a.p+�' �' r: if► is i.: •
•;O,'o# Iia i R 0 � i ••-•••••!
t
3
i'
CI""fill
YOF PO wv w
ITEM:
AY
TITLEa
SCALE moo= ATTACHMENT S
G
JUIN 121986 ITEM 2
s
8 of Q 1Cil11 1At?� �'T G Nll 'fC�n