Item 3 - PDC Analysis for Friends of Chubad Lubavitch, Inc. Church, Merle WatsonJill
=WN/� �g1
AGENDA. REPORT
1 G1,� OF Pp���
CITY OF POWAY
x ; yF c �M....r •w �'
N .`i• - JL'' THE GdU
TO Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James L. Bowersox, City Man er
;INITIATED BY: Reba W. Touw, Director of Planning Services
DATE: June 12, 1986
SUBJECT: Pre -development Conference Analysis for Friends of
Chubad Lubavtch, Inc. Church, Merle Watson,
App1ican
ABSTRACT
'Request.: Consideration of a request to construct a 11,300
square foot church facility.
Location: The triangular parcel located between Espola and Old
Espola.Road, adjacent to the City of San Diego.
Gross
Acreage: 1.10 acres
Surrounding
Land Use: The properties to the north, east, south, and west
are all zoned for single family residential. Two
existing churches are located to the east.
Slope: Six percent
General Plan
and zoning: The subject property, is zoned RR -C. The land located
to the west belongs to the City of San Diego and is
zoned for single family residential Summerfield
Estates, zoned RS -7, is located to the south.
Properties to the north and east are zoned RR. -C.
History: A number of development proposals: and zone change
requests have been submitted for the subject parcel.
The fact that the majority of the property lies
within a valley has posed a major development
obstacle.
6-3-86 Concurred to hear at workshop 6-12-8f-.
ACTIoli1: sen
r
1 rn.f F
JUN 121986 ITEM 3
J UN 3 1986 1
4. Surrounding Zoning and General Plan
.SUN 12 1986 H t 3
2 of
JUN 8 "'918 ED' i 1 L a 2L
June 12,
1986
Page 2'
Zoning:
The Zoning Development Code stipulates that churches ti
may be allowed in any residential or commercial zone
provided the approval of a Conditional Use Permit is
first obtained. For semi-public and public uses, a `
50 foot setback buffer must be maintained from all
single family residential zones. When adjacent to
street frontages, a minimum of 20 foot landscaped
setback is required. Parking lots should also be
planted with 15 gallon minimum size trees every three g.
spaces-. Parking for church facilities require either
one space per every three seats or one space every 45
square feet of gross floor area within the main audi-
torium where there are no fixed seats. The applicant
is providing 70. spaces for the 2,640 square foot
sanctuary. City parking standards require 58 spaces.
The overall height of the church tower cannot exceed {
35 feet from street level.''
Genera
Plan:
The average slope for land proposed.for public uses
should be ten percent or less.; The building design
and the use of textured materials should be combined
to create a structure that is consistent with the
rural character of Poway. The fact that this pro-
perty is at a -main entranceway into the City emphasi-
zes the importance of the design.
Discussion: Aspreviouslymentioned,, the major difficulty in the
development of this site is that a majority of the
property lies within a valley or, hole. The applicant
has prepared a unique solution to this problem.
Instead of filling the site to street grade, the
church is proposing to offer underground parking.
The church facility would be constructed on pylons at
street grade with the area underneath to be used for
parking. The church would appear, from most eleva-
tions to be built at street level.
JLB:RWT:JHL:pn
Attachments.
1.
Applicant Letter
2.
Agreement of Understanding
3
Site Plan
4. Surrounding Zoning and General Plan
.SUN 12 1986 H t 3
2 of
JUN 8 "'918 ED' i 1 L a 2L
JUN 12 1986
JUN 3 1986
ELFT' OF UDIDF�STARdDM
City Council for the City of Poway, hereinafter referred to as "City" and
Cn t�lvcr
►eWL a {.-u h 4 ., {i N hereinafter referred to as "Proponent"
enter into this t of Understanding based upon the following facts
Proponent mans or has an equitable interest in land described by tax
assessor's parcel number ( s) 7 3 -' e' -Lo
Proponent desires to develop this property in accordance with the will of the
- City and without the expense of a protracted. development
City is concerned that Proponent will create develop} plans unsatisfac-
tory to City and consume time and effort of City employees needlessly on
unsatisfactory development plans unless City assists in directing Proponent.
Based upon the above-mentioned facts, City will grant Proponent a hearing
prior to filing any application for development upon the following
understanding:
A. City will render no •decision_ with regards to any development proposal or
part thereof.
B. City will receive no evidence, specific in nature, in support of a par-
ticular development plan.
G. City -will make no representations that will obligate the City to render
I ir a decision in favor of or against any development proposal or part
thereof Proponent may subsequently submit.
D. If any development proposal is subsequently submitted, Proponent will
proceed. as its sole and exclusive risk with the understanding that City
has made no representations upon which Proponent may rely.
f
4f t
Dated: Proponent:
Signature:: f
JUN 12 1986 ITEM
T E 29
3
�L �► ,!v _
• C♦,fin
' to s•t•tse •� � � `4` •, i i` Get
LL i
h _ w
er
►�� - •.' � +ss ass - _ . �..
_ •e UDR LE.rEL
i'
4040
,
•,...
•°'r ��• f�%"sem sr�sena — std
l
t _
EsPOLA ROAD L��IEL
P A_gITECCI'Y_
TITLE S� PLIs.�I
SCALE : ATTACHMENT 3
4. -
5 of 6 F JUN 3 1986 1 T. EPA 29A
RR -Co
Aw
COI
,r c ! � ,.aC�. Ltd, �,) i F � � � •�
st
t p�f� Y
209
i > •,
-0
�►- }�,
RS -2 s
,
RR-Crl
�S;
t
Ale
v
R s� tt
�. �,i s r eo • ,
Q' � + aaaof� e•
w; �.. � * •a x � t v a,'a � o � e q ,'• .- •••fir � • ;.. �
•.,••.•i°!ei i7 Oar ,. 4a •e••••i
s•e••oea•• gx,o �'a se•••e.e
•..•.! • �w b.. q r • • a •
e i i• o o- 0.a ,a o of O�,Q, ¢ O a
see
y`
•�iC
we
EFF �
•'s • a • o s e••••s•
- • • • �. • s... o s f ! • eoi s t•• els � "`•
s •s • eyl , o. s '.,� fyj� . � .�,: 3 • . !oi i i i • ,
ITEM
E Thi
CITYOF POWA4yr'p
TITLE
SCALE
ATTACHMENT
6 of 6, JUN 12 1986 ITEM ?,
AN 3 1986 IT P nfi -�� �