Loading...
Item 27C - PDC 86-42CARL R. KRUSE,Mayor MARY SHEPARI.DSON, Deputy Mayor BRUCE TARZ Councilmember. LINDA ORAVEC, Councilmember BOB EMERY, Councilmember Manbers of the city C c RCM: Carl Carl. R. Kruse, Mayor DATE: October 28, 1986 SUB F rz Pre-Develorment Conference Analysis (PDC 86-42) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * - * * * * * Attached. is a request from.. News Develorment. Company for. a pre -development cow fer mce; if you concur, it' will be scheduled. for the Nc v , 1986 workshop.. OCT 8 1986 ITEM. 27 City Hall Located at 13325 Civic Center Drive Mailing. Address: P.0 Box 789,. Poway, California 92064 •1(619) 748-6600, (619) 695-1400 E P -! 'AGENDA CITY OF FO AY TCI. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM. James L. Bower.sok.,City Mana i INITIATED B.Y:: Reba W. Touw Director of. Planning Services- Ae } Sharon. E.. Crockett,- Assistant. Planner 3 DATE, i Oct®be'r 2"8, 1986: SUBJECT: Pre-De�relopment Conference Analysis: ("PDC 86-421.for Nexus 'Development Company. ABSTRACT Request:. , ,Clarification-, of a" .proposed- amendment to the development standards for 'mult.ir-fami:]y projects --that. would limit'development and density calculations to, an area of _15percent or less in reference to a pro posed 78 -unit, apartment. project.. Locution: Northeast. corner of the intersection of Poway and Carriage Roads. Gross f F Acreage: 11.9 acres. s. c Surrounding LanC Use: The property to the north .s zoned far, single fam�:ly residential uses..: A 7 -Eleven convenience ence etore is 4 ;. located to the west,: an, ARCO AM -PNS, m nimart to the outh, r and Wendy's restaurant i s located adjacent to' the east boundary. 91lopeft - Previous grading has established cut banks. There is, a 25 foot. elevational change from Poway Road. to the Plateau equal, to 57$ slope:. Fromthe plateau ' to the toy. of an adjoining hill. there is a 107 foot ele- vational difference equal to a . 36%slope. ACT1 a OOT 2 8 1986 tT E M 27 (L ;r Agenda Report October 28, 1,986 4. page 2 General. Plan and. Zoning. The.'subj.ect site: is zoned Residential Condominium. Properties to the north are. zoned RS -7 -with- those, on the east, ` west, and south. zoned for General Commercialuses-. There is. also a small section of RA zoned property to the northwest. History: Tentative-- Map 41.80 was approved by the County of San , Diego in oc.tober 19°8.0 and revised in 1992. As; part of the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in 1.9-83 the zoning was changed from RV -3 and PV; ---10 (Residential Variable} ` to RC: (,..Residential Condomiriiuml . The approved tentative Wrap in a conditional use permit. for a 71 -unit condominium project for the site.. A. third, time extension for the tentative map was denied in December` 1984. With. the denial of the map; the Conditional Use Permit 82-0-2 for tie project also expired. The site has: been, previously graded creating an elongated plateau parallel to Poway Road and. Carriage Road which is; suitable for development. A large h ills.ide extends to the east ` f o -r tb? i s: la - P teau area and: was designated as: open`: space under the now expired tentative map and conditional` use, permit. During the past month, Staff has been work -l' with: the applicant to ` develop ' a project for the site that would be acceptable to the, Council. Recently the Council has directed Staff -to amend the development standards :for multi -family projects. The proposed amendment would limit development, and. density calcu-• latons. to: those areas with a _slo a o -f 15 p percent or less. The subject site is one of the two sites:` within: the City that is zoned for multi. -family deve.-, lopment and contains slopes in excess: of 15 percent... Zoning: The Code provides. for a maximum of 7-12 units per net acre. The gross acreage of the site is 11.9. acres. This acreage wouldconceptually support up= to 1:2:7 cor dorinium or apartment units at a maximum. density of 12 units per net acre. The applicant'sengineer completed a slope analysis of the site to determine the amount of acreage with a slope, of 15 ' percent or less.`. In his analysis he included all, areas of ,the 1:1..9 acres; site. (Thais exhibit. will. be introduced at the workshop.,. ), There, are approximately, 5.:65 gross acres with a slope -'of -15 percent or less.; If density is based upon this 5..6:5: gross. acreage, this' `would allover 67' units- at the maxi-- . , mum of 12 units per acre. The appl,icant.'s proposal: is for 7a units... QF OCT,$1986ITEC 27 Agenda Report } October ° 28r 1.9:86 Page 3 The follow ng development standards also apply to. multi -family projects.. A 50 -foot setback is required. from any singefamily zone . r�hen the groposed building exceeds. IS feet in' he .ght..; An ei.ght:-foot-, hiRgh. block. -wall -is required on the .boundary line btrt- ween the. two- zonesF.: Bu lding heights are: limited to " two stories or 3`5` feet whichever *a less. On-site Y parking ifs based on ,the -number o -f bedrooms with.a - { ., mini -mum one -garage spaces "per- bedroom._ -site i:mprouements such: as a swimming: pool, children r s play, Y areas and. park -I ke quiet :areas are also required. ATI existing slc�gea must be landscaped with trees', � r ahrubs.:r and groundcover *: - Qeneral Plan: Due to: the high: �zrsi:billty of the project site, future - structures ..should be constructed in, a nonce obstrt�s�ve _manner' an painted %n darthtone .colors to. minimize the visual impact. pn Attachments.: to :Plan Agreement of Understanding � eater Eton. _ Appl-icant _t 001 1986 tT E IA 2 �. P-6 SITESUMMAR,Y 13 BW.DINGS 78 TOTAL UNITS 2 BIDROOM 5x APARTME$TS ICREEMIlt OF UNMSTANDING City Council for the City of Poway, herd natter referred to as `City" and NEXUS-DEOPN EN COMPANY , here naf er referred to as 'Proponent" enter into this Agreement: of Understanding based upon. the following facts: Proponent oils: or- has an �Aecitlitabe interest an land described by tax assessor's parcel riuinberlsl Proponent desires to develop. this P� p property in accordance withthe will of the City and without the expense of a protracted deveiopont.� City is concerned that. Proponent will create.`dev t a plans unsatisfac- tory to- City and consume: =time and. effort of City employees needlessly on unsatisfactory develogient plans unless City assists in directing Proponent. Based upon the above-ffent oned facts, City will grant Proponent a hear s prior 'tog any application for development: upon the following unders ing: City will rerlaler no decision with regards to any development proposal or part thereof.. City _ will receive no evidence, specific in nature, air support of a particular deveioPrent plan. City will make no representations that will obligate the City to r a decision in favor of or against anny development thereof Proponent _nay subsequently suhnit. If any development propos is subseauentiy submitted, Proponent... will. proceed at its sole and exclusive risk with the understanding that City has :rade no representations: upon which Proponent may rely. Dated: e ?% OF C". Proponent Sig' urs OCT 2g 1986 ITEM 27e HEDENKAP &ASSOCIATES • ARCHI'fECI-JRE NING 1331 INDIA STREET, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 619-232-3034 Qctober l6, 1986 City of Poway Reba W. Tour Director of Planning Services; P.O. Box 789 Poway,Calif. 92064 RE': Pre -Development Conference Multi -Family housing site NE Corner Poway Rd. •& Carriage Rd. To whom it may concern, Attached 'please find a copy of a proposed site pian for the above referenced project. The proposal indicates 78 units in 13 -six unit buildings on the 11.9 acre site. This results in a density of 6.55 units per acre. The. buildings . proposed would each have 2 -three bedroom townhouse units and. -two Bedroom flats with units ranging in size from 900 to 1300 square feet. The proposed design is in substantial conformance with the: City of Poway Multiple Family Design and. Residential Zone Criteria. previous meetings with the planning Department staff have resulted in, the lower density and revised site design. Although we have staff support for this proposal we request city council input with respect to density,access and design concept.; if you. have any questions or require additional information please contact me at 232-3034. Sincerely, Wiliam B. Eedenkamp Architect . .A- 6 or OCT 28 1986 ITEM