The URL can be used to link to this page

11-19-19 Agenda Packet CITY OF POWAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2019 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING – 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS | 13325 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE | POWAY, CALIFORNIA 92064 The City Council also sits as the City of Poway Planning Commission, Poway Housing Authority, Public Financing Authority and Successor Agency to the Poway Redevelopment Agency The City of Poway welcomes you and encourages your continued interest and involvement in the City’s decision-making process. MEETINGS: Regular City Council meetings are held on the first and third Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. PUBLIC MEETING ACCESS: Regular City Council meetings are broadcast live on Cox Communications Channel 24 and Time Warner Channel 19. Council meeting videos are archived and available for viewing on the City’s website. AGENDA MATERIALS: This agenda contains a brief summary of each item the Council will consider. The Agenda and Agenda Packet is posted seven (7) days prior to regular City Council meetings and are available for viewing on the City’s website at www.poway.org or in the City Clerk’s office of City Hall, 13325 Civic Center Drive. Sign up at www.poway.org to receive email notifications when City Council agendas are published online. Items listed on the agenda with a “#” symbol are in preparation. SPEAKERS: Persons wishing to address the Council on matters not on the agenda may do so under Public Comments. Those wishing to speak on items on the agenda may do so when the item is being considered. Please submit a Speaker’s Slip to the City Clerk prior to the meeting or the announcement of the item. All comments will be limited to three (3) minutes. AMERICAN DISABILITIES ACT TITLE II: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, persons with a disability may request an agenda in appropriate alternative formats as required by Title II. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk’s office 858.668.4530 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. REMINDER: As a courtesy to all attendees, please silence all electronic devices and engage in conversations outside the Council Chambers. John Mullin Dave Grosch Councilmember Deputy Mayor Caylin Frank Barry Leonard Councilmember Councilmember Steve Vaus Mayor Page 2 City Council – Regular Agenda November 19, 2019 CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Mullin, Leonard, Frank, Grosch, Vaus PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE MOMENT OF SILENCE PRESENTATION PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NOTE: In accordance with State law, an item not scheduled on the agenda may be brought forward by the general public for comment; however, the City Council will not be able to discuss or take action on any issue not included on the agenda. If appropriate, your concerns will be referred to staff. Comments are limited to three (3) minutes. Speakers will have only one opportunity to address the Council under Public Oral Communications. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR (Approved By Roll Call Vote) The Consent Calendar may be enacted in one motion by the Council without discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the public, or City staff requests that an item be removed for discussion. 1.1 Approval of Reading by Title only and Waiver of Reading in full of Ordinances on Agenda 1.2 Ratification of Warrant Registers for the Periods of October 14, 2019 through October 18, 2019; and October 21, 2019 through October 25, 2019 1.3 Approval of the October 15, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 1.4 City’s Investment Report as of September 30, 2019 1.5 Approval of the Add-On of Software Licensing to the Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA) from Crayon Software Experts, LLC 1.6 Approval of the Appropriation of Funds for the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s Water Quality Certification Permit for Annual Concrete Channel Maintenance 1.7 Acceptance of the Poway Dam Security Upgrades Project; Bid No. 19-011 with AToM Engineering Construction, Inc. as Complete 2. ORDINANCE None. 3. PUBLIC HEARING 3.1 Minor Development Review Application 19-028 and Variance 19-002: A Request to Allow a Proposed Addition to an Existing Single-Family Home to Encroach into the Front Yard Setback on the Property Located at 13205 Avenida La Valencia City Manager’s Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council take public input, close the public hearing and adopt the Resolution Page 3 City Council – Regular Agenda November 19, 2019 3.2 Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Title 17 of the Poway Municipal Code Pertaining to Lighting Standards for Recreational Courts; Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) 19-002 City Manager’s Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council take public input, close the public hearing, introduce the Ordinance for first reading by title only, waive further reading, and schedule the adoption of the Ordinance for December 3, 2019 3.3 Tentative Parcel Map 19-002; A Request for Approval of a Second One-Year Time Extension for a Previously Approved Subdivision City Manager’s Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council take public input, close the public hearing and adopt the Resolution 4. STAFF REPORT None. 5. WORKSHOP 5.1 Water and Wastewater Rate Study and Public Workshop City Manager’s Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council select Option 2b or 2c for water and Option 2b or 2c for wastewater and direct staff to have the Cost of Service Study report prepared for the selected options and presented at the January 7, 2020 “set the public hearing” meeting 6. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL-INITIATED ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS – Pursuant to AB1234 - (G.C. 53232.3(d)) JOHN MULLIN BARRY LEONARD CAYLIN FRANK DAVE GROSCH STEVE VAUS 7. CITY MANAGER ITEMS 8. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS 8.1 Public Employee Performance Evaluation Gov. Code § 54957(B)(1) Title: City Manager ADJOURNMENT State of California County of San Diego ) ) ss. ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Ana Marie Alarcon, Senior Administrative Assistant of the City of Poway, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that this notice of a Regular Meeting as called by the City Council of the City of Poway was posted and provided on November 12, 2019 at 4:30 p.m. Said meeting to be held at 7:00 p.m., November 19, 2019, in the Poway City Council Chambers, 13325 Civic Center Drive, Poway, California. Said notice was posted on the Bulletin Board at the entrance to City Hall and on Poway.org. Ana Marie Alarcon, Senior Admin . Assistant Page 4 C ity Council -Regular Agenda November 1 9, 2019 Item 1.1 Approval of Reading by Title Only and Waiver of Reading in Full of Ordinances on Agenda. November 19, 2019, Item #1.2 DATE: TO: FROM : CONTACT: City of Poway COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT November 19, 2019 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Aaron Beanan, Director of Finance ~ Stacey Tang , Finance Manager gf (858) 668-4426 or stang@poway.org SUBJECT: Ratification of Warrant Reg isters for th e Periods of October 14, 2019 through October 18, 2019; and October 21, 2019 through October 25, 2019 Summary: The attached warrant register reports for the periods of October 14, 2019 through October 18, 2019; and October 21, 2019 through October 25 , 2019, are subm itted to the City Council for ratification/approval . Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council ratify/approve the attached warrant registers . Discussion: Weekly registers of audited demands are periodically submitted to the City Council by the Fina n ce Director for ratification/approval. Date October 14, 2019 through October 18, 2019 Amount $1 ,135,862 .53 Warrants for amounts in excess of $100 ,000 for this period include: Warrant Check Number Amount Buehler Reservoir Reha-b-ili-ta-ti_o_n---------.--40_7_670 -~I $--12-0-,6-5-6-.01 ] October 2019 Medical Insurance 407689 __ ____.I_$_ 214,559.49 Payroll 10/25/19, Retirement 905321 $ 126,786.23 Date October 21 , 2019 through October 25 , 2019 Amount $3 ,656 ,459.02 Warrants for amounts in excess of $100 ,000 for this period include: Warrant [ Espola Road Project [ Wells Fargo Bank Investment Purchase ' Federal Farm Credit Bank Investment Purchase I Payroll 10/25/19 1 of 26 Check Number 905322 905323 905324 905325 Amount $ 400,000.00 $1 ,057 ,055.56 $1 ,036,176.11 $ 678,024.35 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2 Environmenta l Review: This action is not subject to review under the Ca l ifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Fiscal Impact: The total amount of warrants for the period of October 14, 2019 through October 18, 2019 is $1 ,135,862.53 . The total amount of warrants for the period of October 21 , 2019 through October 25, 2019 is $3,656,459.02. Public Notification: None. Attachments : A. Wa rra nt Register for the period of October 14, 2019 through October 18 , 2019 B. Warrant Register for the period of October 21 , 2019 through October 25 , 2019 Reviewed/Approved By : Wendy serman Assistant City Manager 2 of 26 Reviewed By: Alan Fenstermacher City Attorney A p proved By: c~ City Manager November 19, 2019, Item #1.2w Ci) The City of Poway Director of Finance Submits the Following Register of Demands for the period 10/14/2019 -10/18/2019 and Recommends its Ratification/Approval: Run Date: 31-Oct-19 a Check Number Check Date Payee/ Vendor# Invoice Number Check Amount )> 407662 17-Oct-19 506 AO REED&CO 407663 17-Oct-19 2096 A-B-CPR & FIRST AID TRAINING INC 313528 Plumbing Service and Repair 313518 City Hall: boiler repair 415010 415010 41200 43020 -----··---·-----·····-·-·--·-·"--·-----·----------------13633 13580 13634 Adult CPR Training Adult CPR Training Total for Check 407662: 80002425 P2420 --~-·-···-•-···-·-·-··-----------------80002425 P2420 --·-···"··'" -· -----------···--···-·-·-·······•··-----··~·••-··-----Adult CPR Training 80002425 P2420 $337.49 $318.50 $655.99 $760.00 $720.00 $1,000.00 Total for Check 407663: $2,480.00 -------------------------------~---·---407664 407665 17-Oct-19 495 17-Oct-19 196 ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS AIRGAS USA, LLC 18723 VHF Portable Charger 9093779556 Carbon Dioxide 9093564843 Carbon Dioxide 501050 43180 $277.90 203020 45200 $216.55 203020 45200 $77.49 Total for Check 407665: $294.04 ~--407666 -· 17-Oct-19 196 )> AIRGAS USA, LLC 9965440646 Airgas Rental -Tower 501050 47900 $27.40 ______ ,,._,.,._.,. ,,,,__........,..,,..., """" ___ ,.... ___ .~-,.,,"' _,. ...-~.-, .. ,.,. -~-· ,.,,.. __ , ___ .,.,, .. -....... .,....,...,,,.,._ 0 :c 3: m z -I )> 9965440645 9965440644 9965440644 Airgas Rentals 503050 47500 $481.80 -----------------·--------········•····-··-------·-Airgas Rentals 501050 47600 $40.20 ----------·••.-,-.,, ... -.... -·· Airgas Rentals 503050 47500 $1,498.80 -----··•-•-,'·•·····-·-.,·-·--------------------------··-··---·---407667 17-Oct-19 9 ~ -• -,_, _____ ,~-'•• YN~-,~ 407668 17-Oct-19 953 407669 17-Oct-19 545 ALL STAR GLASS INC 9093579248 99655478171 WPY074624 AMERICAN MESSAGING SERVICES, LLC L 1073904TJ AME RIGAS 3097048498 EMS Oxygen 503050 47500 $285.97 SCBA Tank Breathing Air 402060 47500 $128.80 ✓••-~•••-• '-'•"•<-">"•,.......,__..,,_,.,.,,,.._"=._,.,._. q;•µ•=s---=-..,.,.-•"'' -,.,.,,..-,,., ,,_,.,.,..,...,_...._, ___ "-'<"~->"-v____ ~•,,-•,,,.-•w•<-''_,..,·~~,...,__,,~,, Unit #BA Windshield repair Pagers Station 2 Propane 413010 501050 501050 Total for Check 407666: $2,462.97 .,-,-, ,-..,.. -•,v •=•«u-<vx,,.,.,-v;,,-,»M....,...,.,_.,_,.,...,,...,.., <->•~m•=•>•~~ 43120 $309.55 41050 $457.75 -.•~"<,-,:,,..,,.,_v""-ff'"'-"'---.;., 21010 $128.22 -... ...._.. ... _...,...._,,,,...,.,.,..,.,.,,.,., ----------~---------------------·--·-·-.. ·-----· .. ., ......... _.,,._. _________ --------------,v<....,._.._ ... .,_,,..,,,,,,.,,.-,.w,.,,,_,_.__,.,,.,...,_.,~ .. --,,,.,,,..--,,,,,..,~-'"' 407670 17-Oct-19 1644 AMP UNITED LLC 2190152-PP10 407671 17-Oct-19 418 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS 000612568C 000612568C 407672 17-Oct-19 21 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES 1621970 ,,.,.,,..,..,.....,.,.,, __ 407673 17-Oct-19 835 AT&T .....,,.....,,.-..,,..,v<,••-,,,-""'''<'"-'""''_..,.,..,,.___, __ ..,.,.,_, ------------------~----.. ••·--··"'·•·----·-··---13656556 13713463 13228716 407674 17-Oct-19 835 AT&T __ ..._ __ _,,_..,..., _______ ,., ---------------···--•···----·---·· 407675 17-Oct-19 835 AT&T --·--·-----··--··-··"'"-........,,.--,. --"'~•-----~---·-,-----,,.,,_,=,--.... ,,.,,...,. -·-·--····-···-·--------.. ---·----~--.•··-----·-··~----· 407676 17-Oct-19 835 AT&T 13726118 Buehler Reservoir Rehabilitation Vision Insurance Premiums: October 2019 Vision Insurance Premiums: October 2019 Monthly cappuccino lease 80005106 P5100 F1000 87371 F1000 87372 Total for Check 407671: 204020 49360 202020 33010 $120,656.01 $2,606.22 ,,._.,...,.-,-,_,.o.,._Y«-»><'<"""-""-""--$74.76 $2,680.98 $55.65 $21.22 ----------·-·-···--···•···--------·----·-··-423040 22000 $21.22 BAN 9391026571 08/24/19-09/23/19 BAN 9391026542 09/06/19-10/05/19 BAN 9391026555 05/24/19-06/23/19 -------------------207020 33010 $58.59 BAN 9391026545 09/10/19-10/09/19 206020 33010 $60.36 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/14/2019-10/18/2019 Check Check Number Date .s:i,. 407677 17-Oct-19 835 AT&T . ·••L.,cc _;?r.~ vxnx~~j:~! . Project 13709828 BAN 9391063084 09/03/19-10/02/19 208020 22000 Page: 2 of 13 Check Amount $60.36 a --407678 " _______ _,~,--· ___ ......._, .. .....,,.. ,, "'?'<"',> 17-Oct-19 835 AT&T •• .. •••••-••M-••--••-•~-•••----••-""-•••• --•••'-'•••••••"''•••-•-13656551 BAN 9391026565 Station 3 08/24/19-09/23/19 501050 33010 $60.36 407679 17-Oct-19 835 407680 17-Oct-19 835 407681 17-Oct-19 835 407644 17-Oct-19 999993 407682 17-Oct-19 408 407649 17-Oct-19 999998 407645 17-Oct-19 999993 407683 17-Oct-19 916 407684 17-Oct-19 893 407685 17-Oct-19 48 905321 18-Oct-19 788 407686 17-Oct-19 532 407687 17-Oct-19 66 407688 17-Oct-19 889 407689 17-Oct-19 1508 407690 17-Oct-19 1479 407691 17-Oct-19 2094 407692 17-Oct-19 1094 407693 17-Oct-19 1623 AT&T 13709829 BAN 9391063090 09/03/19-10/02/19 410060 33010 $79.92 AT&T 13670234 BAN 9391026553 Station 2 08/27/19-09/26/19 501050 33010 AT&T 13713465 BAN 9391026551 09/06/19-10/05/19 114010 33010 ----------------··-·--···-----·-----·------BETANCOURT, TONY L RW19-0218 RW19-0218 -Release Security Deposit 390030 59800 ----------·----·-·--··--------------.·•-·--·--------------$99.48 $935.96 $500.00 $200.00 $111.94 BOOT WORLD INC -.,x..,.,,"'"""'"'WA~v-1~•• --•=~'--"-• BRILLON, LAWRENCE ~-------. ,. BROKEN ARROW COMMUNICATIONS, INC. C.A. SHORT COMPANY CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION CALIFORNIA TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 CALPERS CANNON PACIFIC SERVICES, INC CHARLES P CROWLEY CO CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS CORPORATION CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF CALIFORNIA CIRO'S LANDSCAPING INC. COBRA SPORTS INTERNATIONAL, INC COMMERCIAL AQUATIC SERVICES CORE & MAIN LP 21719 FY20 Boot Allowance: Greschke 412040 49280 ·--· --·-···--··-·"-·••->,-.. ' -~---10/19 -Brillon Mileage Reimb: Brillon 113010 31010 RW#18-0335 1531660 1532711 Jul-Sept 2019 DUES OCT 2019 PERS EFT 2019-20 RW18-0335: Security Release for ROW Permit 390030 Service Award Catalogs: 04 2019 121010 Service Award: Valentino 121010 Jul-Sept '19 BASASRF/CALSB1473 303030 Teamsters' dues for October 2019 F1000 PERS EFT PE2019-20 F1000 59800 45500 45500 Total for Check 407683: 77340 86110 87100 $5,000.00 $16.02 $421.69 $437.71 $1,287.00 $1,928.00 $126,786.16 ----~-----------···•-··-•-···--·· ,..~ ....... ,-~ _ _..,.......,,_.."«··,.~,,-,,_, -~-· ,._._"""',, ... PERS EFT 2019-20 150659 150656 26302 92744517 2536656 2536656 12511 .... "·"'-~""""""°•=-...__ ..... 21110-11654 119-5264 119-5198 L269247 PERS EFT PE2019-20 111010 13140 $0.07 Total for Check 905321: $126,786.23 Bus Stop Maintenance 80002434 P2430 $2,021.50 ------~------------Street Sweeping Alum Pump Parts ..,...,.,,..,....,..,..,.,,,_ ,_ .. ,.,._,._..._.., Aluminum Sulfate, 09/26/19, 48,000 lbs Insurance Premiums: October 2019 Insurance Premiums: October 2019 Veteran's Park: irrigation repair Beach Tennis Net _,.,,,.,...,..--..,.,.,._..,,,,.,-,.,.,.,._ .• -.._' Bulk Chlorine .,.,__,,,__»,.,,,,_,_, ____ ··--·--~··-·"'--·-·--Bulk Acid Meter Valve 411040 43320 $20,273.17 402060 402060 F1000 F1000 414040 414040 203020 203020 F5100 Total for Check 407686: $22,294.67 43080 $1,327.10 45200 $4,933.52 . --·-···' "--~--·-___ . ........,,._ ____ 87320 $205,430.66 --.-.... ,, 87311 $9,128.83 .,,,,.__.,,,,,,,,,_,, ,,_,.,,_,,_, ______ ,, __________ ~~·· Total for Check 407689: $214,559.49 41600 43160 45200 45200 Total for Check 407692: $1,021.10 $861.00 $549.03 $499.13 $1,048.16 -------------------···-·······-·-·---------·----81350 41200 $905.10 $162.63 407694 17-Oct-19 847 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC. DS1290055 Backup Data Storage: Sept 2019 113010 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2en 0 -ti N O') Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/14/2019 -10/18/2019 Check Number 407695 407696 407697 407698 Check Date Payee/ Vendor# 17-Oct-19 286 17-Oct-19 285 17-Oct-19 85 17-Oct-19 329 COSTCO WHOLESALE COUNCIL OF WATER UTILITIES COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEH Invoice Number 7759240641 7751427468 COWU OCT2019 COWU OCT2019 05429-2004-Rl-2019 DEH2002-HUPFP-128372 Page: 3 of 13 Check Amount JPIA Training Refreshments: Lockout/Tagout 400060 47600 $101.68 < ,,,,,,,,_,, ,,-,_,,,,_,,,,•-,,-•M•••••<<•-•-H-',H"--~--'><,,_, ___ , Janitorial Supplies 201020 47200 $103.28 -----..•••vs',.,_,..,_,,,,,",,,_,._-.,_, ._,,,,.,,~,,,_,_,_,.,_,,~.-,-.-.,-,,~..,.-••, ----•~•••-•'«""'"''" Council of Water Utilities Meeting: 10/15/19 400060 ___________ ,., ___ , _______ , __ , ____ _ Council of Water Utilities Meeting: 10/15/19 401060 Permit LS-1 Dec 2019 to Dec 2020 403070 Permit Renewal DEH2002-HUPFP-128372 413010 Total for Check 407695: 14010 14010 Total for Check 407696: 57300 57300 $204.96 $45.00 $45.00 $90.00 $446.00 $1,051.00 ___________________________ ,. _______________ _ 407699 17-Oct-19 488 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM 407700 17-Oct-19 94 COX COMMUNICATIONS 407659 17-Oct-19 999997 DE LIMA, ANDRE 407701 17-Oct-19 1526 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY 407702 17-Oct-19 1525 DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA 407703 17-Oct-19 1780 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 407704 17-Oct-19 2022 DEPARTMEN-T OF HEAL TH CARE SERVICES 905320 15-Oct-19 942 DEPT. OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES 905319 15-Oct-19 97 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 407705 17-Oct-19 2058 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 407706 17-Oct-19 101 ESGIL LLC 407707 17-Oct-19 465 EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES LLC •--·-.-~-•--•.~~·--.-.v,,,,.,,,___... ___ ._,,_.".,.-.-:,,..,. ·-,,--,-..,=_.,..,,__,_,_,__,,,,._....,.._.,,,....,.,...,,._ 407708 17-Oct-19 350 EWING IRRIGATION 407709 17-Oct-19 724 FASTENAL COMPANY 20CTOFPON03 41212502-10/19 40313600-43 40313600-43 BE003604 711 BE003604711 BE003603146 BE003603146 Jul-Sept 2019 Jul-Sept 2019 800 MHz Network Radios & Terminals Sept 2019 City Hall Internet Connection: Oct 2019 Closing Bal Refund: Deposit #40313600-43 Closing Bal Refund: Deposit #40313600-43 Insurance Premiums: October 2019 Insurance Premiums: October 2019 Insurance Premiums: October 2019 --""""------··"""" Insurance Premiums: October 2019 Jul-Sept 2019 SMI and Seismic Hazard Mapping Fee -"""""' ______ ,.,.,.,.__h<',.,,,.v-2019 SMI and Seismic Hazard Fee -~_,,..,,..,..,....,.,. ,_.,.-,._,,.,,,_.,,,_,_ =-"·••,.,, .... -·~~-~---,· """"'='"-'•'-'"'-~··· =··-~--~---=-,.., . .,. GEM1119O764 2019 Qtr2 GEMT Pmt Apr-Jun 2019 CLO WH PE2019-21 Payroll Garnishment =--'""'--~~-,,_ •• .,.,,,,. -----,,,,.,...,,_,.,..,, CAL WH PE2019-21 CAL W/H EFT PE2019-21 -------=· ~,__-_,.,. .... PPE 10/6/19 Payroll Garnishment __ ,, ____ .,. __ """"'' 10/19-ESGIL PC & Inspection Services -SEPT ---------904189937 LS-2 St. Andrews Motor Repair 8403085 Shears: Miller CASAD59788 Caustic Pump Repair Kit R-14 Warranty Repair 114010 114010 F5100 F5100 F1000 F1000 F1000 F1000 303030 F1000 503050 F1000 F1000 F1000 502050 403070 112010 402060 43180 22000 86620 81020 Total for Check 407659: 87361 87362 Total for Check 407701: 87361 $8,977.50 $1,298.50 $250.00 ($206.46} $43.54 $782.04 $41.32 $823.36 $16,809.56 87362 $467.22 Total for Check 407702: $17,276.78 77340 86990 Total for Check 407703: 77550 86150 86170 ------~-·-·-86150 17050 43080 45600 43080 $7,502.71 ($375.14} $7,127.57 $13,817.10 $1,889.98 $28,841.30 $147.30 $7,529.41 $179.95 ·-----$45.68 $36.10 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2en 0 -ti N en Register of Demands: Page: 4 of 13 Warrants from 10/14/2019 -10/18/2019 Check Number 407710 407711 Check Date Payee/ Vendor# 17-0ct-19 116 17-0ct-19 104 FERGUSON WATERWORKS FIRE ETC. Invoice Number 0691925 0691348 134766 Bronze Strap Saddle Soft Tube Personal Protective Equipment 81350 81350 Total for Check 407710: $387.25 $963.29 $1,350.54 ~--~.--,_,..,-.--,=--~,.-501050 403570 47600 49240 $285.54 $170.00 407650 407651 407712 407713 407714 407715 407716 17-0ct-19 999998 FITZPATRICK, VERNON 10/19 -Fitzpatrick Fitzpatrick Reimburse CSM Grade 1 Test Fee 17-0ct-19 999998 FRIED, RAYMOND 10/19 -Fried --------------------·--·-···--·----·------·· Tuition Reimbursement: American History II Armored Car Service: Oct 2019 17-0ct-19 957 GARDA CL WEST INC. 10518282 17-0ct-19 838 GEMAL TO COGENT, INC 419478 Fingerprinting: September 2019 17-0ct-19 573 GOVCONNECTION, INC. 57159717 Symantec Ghost Software License & Maint 121010 114010 121010 113010 14040 $690.00 ------·--·---·-·-··-·-----41200 $675.39 49340 $4.90 41200 ----------------------·-----.-·•-·"•----··--~-$189.20 $188.29 17-0ct-19 120 17-0ct-19 589 GRAINGER INC 9311575378 (15) Elbows 9315812918 Supplies, Surge Outlet Strip, Coupler and Spoons ---·····----·-·-·•··'"·--------------9317298140 Office Supplies, Folders and Binders F5200 81350 402060 43080 $277.48 402060 47100 --·---··-·-·--·------------$90.97 ($283.17) 9319077765 9319687886 9321012511 GROSSMAN PSYCHOLOGICAL 01102019 ASSOCIATES, APC Credit Memo -Invoice 9305674047 Boatswain Whistle Installation Supplies Dock Supplies Pre-Employment Psychological Evaluation 405060 43080 80007772 P7770 $17.95 202020 4 7600 $5.02 ww,,._ ___ ._,_ __ __,,_,_,.~---~-',._,.._...,,_.._..-...,"'-•;.,,.=v-=-Total for Check 407715: $296.54 121010 49160 $975.00 --·---·--·--•-·----------407717 17-0ct-19 480 407718 17-0ct-19 127 407719 17-0ct-19 142 HARPER & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING ENG-6722 Special Inspection 80005106 P5100 $18,746.00 INC ENG-6771 ENG-6774 ------------•-·-·-------·•-•"-·. Special Inspection Consulting Services -Pomerado ·-----------·--·-· ·•-·-·--·,--·•·• 80005106 P5100 $13,355.00 80005106 P5100 $1,351.00 Total for Check 407717: $33,452.00 HAWTHORNE MACHINERY CO PS000867623 Unit 681 -Oilcat Hydro 413010 47900 $20.12 ----------·---------•--"-···------------·······-···--··•····•··-·•·-··---•·•·•---,.----------•,0•-····· ... ·.--------•-··-HEAVILAND ENTERPRISES INC 28315 Kumeyaay, Landscape Maintenance 414040 41600 $269_62 September 2019 --------· _______ .. ,, ................... ,_ ,.,,,-,, .. -.. ----------·"•-·--·-·--·-----·--··-·--·--·--" 28314 Maintenance and Repair 414040 41600 $1,562.47 ·----·-··· ....... ,. .• ., _____________ ~-----------------··~---···----28312 28312-2 Landscape Maintenance Rights-of-Way Maint 414040 41600 $5,510.30 -----------------------------------Landscape Maintenance 421140 41600 $518.50 28312-3 Landscape Maintenance 421240 ! 41600 ·---------28312-4 Landscape Maintenance 424040 ,, 41600 _2-83_12_-5 __ . __ ---__ L_a_n_ds_ca_p_e_M_a_in_te_n_a_n_ce __________ 4_2_4_1_40--+I-41600 28312-6 Landscape Maintenance 425140 41600 ,_ ... ,., .,,..,_ .•. , ,,,, --------· ·----·------·-·-·· ·--··-----28313 Landscape Maintenance 421040 ---------·---··--·--·------»--·•---------·-··-·•---·-·····-· -------28313-2 Landscape Maintenance 423040 41600 41600 ---------·--·---~ $126.60 $428.47 $1,830.00 $968.31 $2,357.29 $4,847.34 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/14/2019 -10/18/2019 Check Check Payee/ Number Date Vendor# P-::n,oa,,,o,nri,-,r Name • ;>;•,;':;::. '½icce5,,C,,,o;,,c-,,"t:,SS-iS£.,,"".<'¾ci'-·;;,,,""C.i,,iY-£"'0',"'"-1CC,,cC',"W•,'° C,C'"'>c-C.,C<c,S'1-"<>' ...,. 407719 17-Oct-19 142 HEAVILAND ENTERPRISES INC 0 -ti N en Invoice Number 28313-3 28313-4 28313-4 28313-4 28313-5 Landscape Maintenance South Poway Business Park South Poway Business Park South Poway Business Park Landscape Maintenance Country Creek: irrigation repair 420140 426040 402060 421040 Page: 5 of 13 Check Amount $315.56 $2,040.00 41600 $27,709.37 41600 $1,914.91 41600 $1,848.51 47700 $306.78 28557 28556 ------·--"-·•·------------------------1-----·-·--·-"-"''" Adobe Ridge: irrigation control 28555 Pomerado: irrigation repair ~"v_,.,, -,.~•,,•~ •-~~"' .,,_, -~•-28554 Poway Road: irrigation repair -------·-,·•----'<''' ------------28553 Poway Road: irrigation repairs 28560 Poway Road: irrigation repair 28558 Twin Peaks: irrigation repair 421040 414040 414040 414040 414040 414040 ---------------------~-----.-,,-,,,,, ____ ,.,,, ,,_, ____ , __ _ 28568 Community Road: irrigation 414040 47700 41600 41600 41600 41600 41600 41600 -------------------··-"·---------28549 Business Park: irrigation repair 414040 41600 28548 Scripps Poway Parkway: irrigation repairs 414040 41600 _______________________ ,,,,,,,"""' _____ ,,,,, ____ --r--·-------·-· 28559 Business Park: irrigation repairs 414040 41600 -------------~-~·---------------,,,.,_,,.,,,, 28561 Business Park: irrigation repairs 420140 47700 ---·--·-·-··---···-·-------1----·--"-'" ,,,,,, 28552 28551 28550 LMD 87-1: irrigation repair 420140 LMD 19-1: irrigation repairs 420140 Business Park: irrigation repair 420140 47700 47700 47700 -,~•~-'-m. ~~~a'"" Total for Check 407719: $474.93 $161.71 $86.14 $128.02 $191.51 $503.64 $730.80 $424.46 $262.21 $61.45 $74.97 $346.63 $147.63 $294.73 $56,442.86 407720 17-Oct-19 152 HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL ACCOUNT 8220162-19 Dock Supplies 202020 47600 $25.48 3220134 Dock Supplies 202020 47600 -··-·--·--------·-·~•-•'-»>,, > -·-"' -·•-•>< ____ _ 3220188 Trails: repair supplies 414040 47600 ,,,·---·-·---·-·-----------·-· 6211877 3220193 3211879 8220166 2220196 0220231 Work Order 230197: repair supplies Work Order 230242: repair supplies Work Order #230242: repair supplies Work Order #183879: repair supplies 415010 415010 415010 415010 47600 47600 47600 47600 ·-----"·-----------------------+---Tar 412040 47600 Rodent control for Unit #53 412040 47600 ---------------------------------·----------+------•"'"""" 1220207 Work Order 230242: repair supplies 415010 47600 ----·-·----------,..-• .,__,.,.,,,,~_.,, ,,,_,-.,,.,=~•••v.....,--<'>'•-'< 1220215 Work Order 230242: repair supplies 415010 47600 --•»• .,-. •• -... -,,,,,_ -•--» -·---+ 0220228 Graffiti abatement paint 412040 47600 $125.60 $12.87 $15.91 $20.21 $58.62 $17.21 $28.41 $56.49 $2.54 ,..,~,.,,...,.,...-·~ ---•»-~--~·-· $3.93 $114.98 November 19, 2019, Item #1.20C) 0 .... N en Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/14/2019 -10/18/2019 Page: 6 of 13 Check Number 407720 407721 Check Date Payee/ Vendor# 17-Oct-19 152 17-Oct-19 1114 407722 17-Oct-19 133 407723 17-Oct-19 134 40764 7 17-Oct-19 999991 Invoice Number HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL ACCOUNT 9211907 0211905 INVENTIVE RESOURCES INC. 251429 --------KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 000104676-0000 10/19 Pomerado R-14 Rehab 10" Valve Pomerado R-14 Rehab 1 O" valve (3) Manhole Odor Eliminator Units Insurance Premiums: October 2019 000104676-0000 10/19 Insurance Premiums: October 2019 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 000104676-7000 10/19 (COBRA) Insurance Premiums: October 2019 KAMINSKI FAMILY TRUST G1353-02 G1353-02, 14040 Iris Ln, Developer Security Refund 402060 402060 403570 F1000 F1000 F1000 392030 43080 43080 Total for Check 407720: 43080 87310 87311 Total for Check 407722: 87311 59800 $55.53 $33.29 $571.07 $2,927.63 $67,893.04 $2,548.71 ---------~----$70,441.75 $521.87 $5,000.00 ..... ...... ---------------------··--.----·------·---•··-· -··-··-··-·-···-· --~ ----~,_ _____ _ 407660 17-Oct-19 999997 KLICH INVESTMENT TRUST II 10225600-18 Closing Bal Refund: Overpay #10225600-18 F5100 81020 $80.00 407724 17-Oct-19 410 KNOTT'S BERRY FARM 100819 Pickle Barrel trash cans w/lids 414040 48260 $4,486.55 ._. __ , __ ,,_ . ...........,~_,,..,________"'", _,...,...,,___,,..._ ·"-""---·,.,,., .......... »-«>•..,,-,"'"~"'-' -···--~= ••••-.·-•·"""-•••-•~••-~------•-,••-••-• -•••••·o .. ,,_,,,., •• 407725 17-Oct-19 757 407726 17-Oct-19 1011 407652 17-Oct-19 999998 407727 17-Oct-19 141 M v,•-~vW -_..._._,_.;,.,.,_.,_ 407764 16-Oct-19 1771 _________ ,.,_,..,.-~----..... 407728 17-Oct-19 933 407653 17-Oct-19 999998 407646 17-Oct-19 999993 -•·-< __ ,,, _ _,_~-.... 407729 17-Oct-19 375 407654 17-Oct-19 999998 . ----=-·· ~-------· ~,.,,,_._,_,,_y, ___ 407648 17-Oct-19 999998 407730 17-Oct-19 1506 KOi CITY INC 019-540 Weekly Maintenance September 2019 414040 41200 $300.00 ----------------•--••"••• ••••••••••W•~---•••• ••••••••••• -•-••••-••• ---•••-----•-.-------KRONOS INC. 11505870 Staffing Program 501050 33010 -------------·--··------··-------------------------$87.54 $129.95 LATOUR, ANDREW Tuition Reimb: AWA Distribution System Review 121010 10/19 -LaTour 14040 LEATHERMAN, RICHARD 2005.200-04.19A Instructor Payment Fall 2019 208020 41300 $2,688.00 LOS ANGELES TRUCK CENTERS, LLC XA29004 7336:01 #921 Red Fleet, Stock-Exhaust Fluid, Oil Filter 413010 47900 $112.85 ----------· --··•--.. ,»-•··-·--··-··-------------~---·--···-····---··---------·-·--·-+------~···--·~··--··,-·-·--·-·-·•·--·-----MAIL DISPATCH MAKEPEACE, KA THY MC CONSTRUCTORS, INC METRO WASTEWATER JPA 185972 Mail Courier Service: Sept 2019 114010 41200 $1,253.56 --••••••-•••••-'o•-•--'•""•" •------,-••--•-••<•<•••••••~•-••••••••<< 10/19 -Makepeace Computer loan MacBook Pro F1000 81050 $1,500.00 RW19-0225 RW19-0225 -Release Security Deposit 390030 59800 $500.00 __________________________ , __ ,,., .... ,_, ________ _ 295 FY20 Adjustment from FY17 Audit 403070 28010 $22,542.55 --------·--·-------,_,," __________ , _ _,_., ______ ,,.,.1--------·-'"-·----•··--·-·---MEYERS, ZACH MURGUIA, ISRAEL MUTUAL OF OMAHA POLICYHOLDER SERVICES 10/19 -Meyers FY20 Boot Allowance: Meyers 202020 49280 $200.00 ---------------~ ----------------------10/19-Murguia Per Diem MMASC Annual Conference 10/19 -Murguia (2) 001009475658 Computer loan MacBook Pro Basic Life/AD&DNol Life/LTD/STD Prem: Oct. 2019 400060 14010 F1000 81050 Total for Check 407648: F1000 86210 $150.75 $1,500.00 $1,650.75 $3,617.55 --------------------···•,.--, ... ,._,. ......... -----------001009475658 001009475658 Basic Life/AD&DNol Life/LTD/STD Prem: Oct. 2019 Basic Life/AD&DNol Life/LTD/STD Prem: Oct. 2019 Basic Life/AD&DNol Life/LTD/STD Prem: Oct. 2019 F1000 F1000 F1000 87330 $3,095.43 87350 $6,635.80 87351 $2,041.93 Total for Check 407730: $15,390.71 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2Register of Demands: Page: 7 of 13 Warrants from 10/14/2019 -10/18/2019 Check Check Payee/ Number Date Vendor# Invoice Number (0 407735 17-Oct-19 1056 MY ESCONDIDO BCG LLC 187549 Unit 12 -Handle 413010 47900 $67.07 0 187653 Unit 62 -Handle 413010 47900 $67.07 ..... N a, Total for Check 407735: $134.14 -~---•D"-----'•---•---~ 0 --•---•--«--N •------•--~----.---407731 17-Oct-19 175 NAPA AUTO PARTS/POWAY 403019 Unit 20 -Spark Plug 413010 47900 $126.39 '""' ___ , ___ """'-"'~«-•,,-,., ""-·' '-' ,,.,.,.,.,. ,.__,, . .,,.....,.,:..-,;,,......,,,_ 403824 Unit 29 -Exhaust Air Check Valves 413010 47900 $113.61 .-,,,,=...,·-"""·--·-·=-----,.-,,•,w'--Aw,,,___..,..-_.,,,,__,.,_ 403865 Unit 904 -Antifreeze Coolant 413010 47900 $280.76 -•-•---~N----·------·,•--~------~ 404107 Unit 22 -Vent Valve 413010 47900 $36.82 __....,_.,_v,,•--•--"'-Total for Check 407731: $557.58 407732 17-Oct-19 565 NEAL ELECTRIC, INC 72710 Fire Station #1: demo old solar 415010 41200 $318.00 407733 17-Oct-19 1268 NEOPOST USA INC. 57054412 Postage Machine Meter Rental: Nov 2019 114010 43080 $65.51 --'>.;,.,,.,x--,_.,,.,_,,__,.-,....-. ,__,,_ __ ,_,_,,._ ,,_,__. ______ ._,_. __ 407734 17-Oct-19 181 NEW PIG CORPORATION 4872097-00 Oil-Only Absorbent F1000 81350 $878.69 .. ,,.,..,..,..,... _ _. .,,,,,...,,_-,.,,,.,... .. ,. ___ _, ,_,.,..,,...,.,,,_ ,...,.,.__,..,, .. ,.,.,.,,.,,,._"""" _,, 407661 17-Oct-19 999997 NEWFIELD, MICHAEL 20872642-05 Closing Bal Refund: Overpay #20872642-05 F5100 81020 $227.35 407736 17-Oct-19 84 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES 385119784-001 Office Supplies 410060 47100 $33.93 DIVISION __ ,.,,,_,~-.,., .. ,,,,,..,, ···--·--·'"---~ -388919392-001 Office Supplies 500050 47100 $214.92 ._.,_,.,,.,_,,.._.__,,,..__,_.._._,,___,__,.,_,v 384995959-001 Office Supplies 205020 47100 $15.06 _,.,,,,., ___ .,,.,,,,.,,,_,,,,_,...,.~ 384995323-001 OPP Office Supplies 205020 47100 $67.77 389017527-001 Office Supplies 305030 47100 $103.25 ,.,.,,.....,,. __ ._.,, ___ 389018513-001 Office Supplies 305030 47100 $3.10 388726212-001 Office Supplies 401060 47100 $82.98 --~-----··-~--·-----------359286833-001 Lake Office Supplies 202020 47100 $181.98 359289322-001 Lake Office Supplies 202020 47100 $319.90 .. ..........,.,,_.,,_,.,.,,".,..,.."""' 359289846-001 Lake Office Supplies 202020 47100 $319.90 370144626-001 Lake Office Supplies 202020 47100 $116.22 -~-.......... ,h-.<,4'",_,_.,.,_,,.,,_"<,,,"-~-, ✓-~--·-·,_,,.,.._.........._,_. ---·-Total for Check 407736: $1,459.01 407737 17-Oct-19 1757 ONE RING NETWORKS, INC I NV000000288656 City Hall Backup Internet: Oct 2019 114010 22000 $499.00 ----·--------------407738 17-Oct-19 896 PALOMAR BACKFLOW PREVENTION 5407 Backflow Prevention 425040 41200 $126.00 SPECIALIST, INC. ..... ..... _,.,,.,,_,.,..,,...,,,,..,._, 5407 Backflow Prevention 425140 41200 $42.00 Total for Check 407738: $168.00 407739 17-Oct-19 194 PARKHOUSE TIRE INC 3010302879 Scrap Tires Fee 413010 29100 $117.00 ___ ____,__,,,-,,_,,,,_ _____ ~-~------3010304484 Unit 924 Red Fleet Tires 413010 47900 $3,823.99 Total for Check 407739: $3,940.99 ,.,,....,.,,__,..__, ___ 407655 17-Oct-19 999998 PARKS, JESSICA 10/19 -Parks Per Diem MMASC Annual Conference 401060 14010 $150.75 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/14/2019 -10/18/2019 Check Number ...1. 407740 0 0 ...... ~ en Check Date Payee/ Vendor# 17-Oct-19 195 ~~•--v,-•-•--• ------•-----•~••----•---•• ~o• 407741 17-Oct-19 1941 407656 17-Oct-19 999998 407742 17-Oct-19 220 407743 17-Oct-19 1689 40 7744 17-Oct-19 747 7745 17-Oct-19 25 40 40 40 40 ,. .,,..,,.,._,.,.,...,. .. ,, .. ,.,.,.. ..... ,.,._,,, __ ,. ... ,,,,,,,_, .... 7746 17-Oct-19 265 7747 17-Oct-19 273 7748 16-Oct-19 1058 PARKWAY BUSINESS CENTRE -------------PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP PERNICANO, JASMINE ,.,,_.,_,,.,_,,._,.._-... --..,-=,.,_,...,,.,_,,, __ , .......... ,......_,,.,,..,.,., PETTY CASH GENERAL PETTY CASH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PLUMBERS DEPOT INC. ----POWAY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION POWAY FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT R & B PINTO PROPERTIES LLC Invoice Number 410-110-CU 10-19 410-110-CU 10-19 45007 10/19 -Pernicano 10/07/19 (Clerk) 10/07/19 (HR) PW PC 10/9/19 PW PC 10/9/19 PW PC 10/9/19 PW PC 10/9/19 PW PC 10/9/19 PW PC 10/9/19 PW PC 10/9/19 PW PC 10/9/19 PW PC 10/9/19 ------·· --=·-------~-PW PC 10/9/19 ,,,.,.., ..... .._,..,.,.,,~ .. ,,,.,.,,.,,,,,, , . ....,..,,,,~.,,_,,,,,.,...,,,,..,,.,,_,,., ... -._,,.,,.,,,....,.~---" PD-43295 "-PD-43357 =·•--•·.-.~········· 10072019 DUES PPE 10/6/19 ---~--""~-· 23502 LKCONC-09/30-10/06 -•-,w...,, _ _.....,,__,, __ ,,,__.><=~,.«,~•.---A LKCONC-09/30-10/06 Assessments fees 105 and 110 10-19 Assessments fees 105 and 110 10-19 Harassment Training Makeup Sessions Tuition Reimb: Tech Track for Clerks, Series 200 Reimburse General Petty Cash 10/07/19 Reimburse General Petty Cash 10/07/19 Public Works Petty Cash replenish-thru 10/9/19 Public Works Petty Cash replenish-thru 10/9/19 Public Works Petty Cash replenish-thru 10/9/19 Public Works Petty Cash replenish-thru 10/9/19 Public Works Petty Cash replenish-thru 10/9/19 Public Works Petty Cash replenish-thru 10/9/19 Public Works Petty Cash replenish-thru 10/9/19 Public Works Petty Cash replenish-thru 10/9/19 Public Works Petty Cash replenish-thru 10/9/19 Public Works Petty Cash replenish-thru 10/9/19 >'<-,,,,,_,_..,,...,,,.._ ••••w-,.,,,-~-------------·--~-,~-~-----··•·-Unit 65A -Nozzle . -----· ,.,___,_._,..""' Hose for Trailer Jetter """""'",,,,,_,,.,_...,., .... ,,,._, __ Poway OnStage ticket sales transfer 414040 410060 121010 121010 100010 121010 401060 402060 405060 401060 410060 400060 401060 413010 400060 ~· 413010 403570 F1000 ·-· --,..-~ ... -,,_,....,...~,,.,.="""-'"'-""""'-"''"'"· ... ·--·----·--··--· < Fire Association dues for PPE 10/6/19 F1000 -.. ~ ---Contract School Crossing Guard Services 504050 Wkly Lk Cone 09/30/19-10/06/19 & CC 09/19 F1000 -·----~__,......,..,,,_.__.,,, Wkly Lk Cone 09/30/19-10/06/19 & CC 09/19 202020 Page: 8 of 13 57300 $725.00 57300 $1,114.00 --··'""'""'""~·-·· $1,839.00 14020 $2,948.14 14040 $150.00 14010 $6.99 49340 $22.97 Total for Check 407742: $29.96 47600 $12.89 31010 $23.78 45200 $5.56 47600 $7.99 "''"""'•-~" ,., .. ___ ,,_,, __ 31010 $45.82 14010 $10.00 47600 $10.17 31010 $23.78 47900 $32.33 ----·-31010 $34.64 .,.,_,, ,.,,, .•.. ,., ·-,.,.,,. ., ,_,.,.,,, ,_,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,.,, ____ ,. Total for Check 407743: $206.96 ·-----. ,,_ __ , __ -~-----~ .. ·--47900 $256.73 _...,,.,_ .... _"·'·"'-'-"""'"•-"'~-·----43080 $177.18 Total for Check 407744: $433.91 86330 $18,447.00 86100 $2,533.50 41070 $1,243.38 "'·=--86320 $2,480.77 __ _,,,,___,__~~~ .. ,. 'N"'W"',.-. 51130 ($341.19) Total for Check 407748: $2,139.58 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2-I, -I, 0 ..... I\) en Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/14/2019 -10/18/2019 Check Number 407749 407750 407657 407752 407751 407658 Check Date Payee/ Vendor# 16-Oct-19 2047 16-Oct-19 230 RAFTELIS FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS, INC. RUTAN AND TUCKER 17-Oct-19 999998 SALGADO, RUBEN 16-Oct-19 221 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 16-Oct-19 218 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC/SUNDRY 17-Oct-19 999998 SANDERS, MARIE 407753 16-Oct-19 1622 SASE COMPANY, INC 407754 16-Oct-19 829 SC COMMERCIAL, LLC Invoice Number 13225 848505 848506 848508 848512 848514 848525 848503 844156 845940 Water and Sewer Rate Study 401060 17200 012782-0005 Professional Svc through 8/31/19 102010 17010 012782-0006 Professional Svc through 8/31/19 121010 17011 012782-0011 Professional Svc through 8/31/19 102010 17010 012782-002 Professional Svc through 8/31/19 80001001 P1000 012782-0023 Professional Svc through 8/31/19 80001001 P1000 012782-0027 Professional Svc through 8/31/19 102010 17020 Professional Services through 08/31/2019 80001001 P1000 Professional services through 06/30/19 80001001 P1000 ------Professional services through 07/31/19 80001001 P1000 Page: 9 of 13 $9,979.42 $12,312.00 $207.00 $1,104.00 $4,209.00 $759.20 $897.00 $2,305.67 .-" -., .. ---·-' $427.50 $58.40 Total for Check 407750: $22,279.77 10/19 -Salgado Paramedic license renewal 503050 31040 $200.00 $161.90 $5,121.04 $5,282.94 -----------------·-------------------·---------60153342241-10/19 13104 Silver Lake Dr 09/10/19-10/09/19 207020 21010 82081137485-10/19 70037975983-09/19 70037975983-09/19 70037975983-09/19 70037975983-09/19 70037975983-09/19 70037975983-09/19 70037975983-09/19 70037975983-09/19 70037975983-09/19 70037975983-09/19 70037975983-09/19 10/19 -Sanders 10/19 -Sanders INV230096 0718965-IN 15498 Espola Rd. 09/10/19-10/9/19 204020 '•'•"-->-'•--A------~• Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 114010 ,v••w-.,....._,..__,.,,,,,...__.,..,_ .. -• -•-•-••---•-•-,_,.-,_ Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 208020 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 202020 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 204020 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 205020 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 414040 21010 Total for Check 407752: 21010 21010 21010 21010 21010 21010 $1,198.79 $317.34 $2,462.37 $139.02 $1,215.95 $214.10 ------------------------------··-··--·•··•-········-··' Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 421040 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 423040 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 425040 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 430050 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 501050 21010 $44.29 21010 $34.17 21010 $20.82 21020 21010 $169.30 $4,926.93 Total for Check 407751: $10,743.08 Mileage and Parking Reimbursement 300030 14010 $133.80 $23.20 _______ .......... ____ _ Mileage and Parking Reimbursement 300030 31010 Total for Check 407658: Unit 411-6: Bearings, Pulley, Rings, Drum 413010 47900 Oil for All City Vehicles 413010 47900 $157.00 $1,348.87 $2,275.91 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/14/2019 -10/18/2019 Check Number Check Date Payee/ Vendor# Page: 10of13 Invoice Number ~ 407754 16-Oct-19 829 SC COMMERCIAL, LLC 0719580-IN Diesel Fuel for Fire Station #3: 499.80 Gal 413010 31020 Check Amount $1,952.93 $4,228.84 N 0 Total for Check 407754: -ti ~ 407755 · 16-Oct-19 282 SHARP REES-STEALY MEDICAL CENTER 336498373 336498692 Respirator Clearance Exam SCBA Fit Test 403570 49160 $121.00 $121.00 336768667 Class A OMV Exam 336499198 FIT respirator testing -. --··--·· -·--··----·-········-·-···---.--336496036 FIT respiratory testing 336497672 Class A physical OMV physical 403570 401060 412040 412040 414040 411040 49160 49160 49160 49160 49160 49160 $121.00 336767794 336687726 ------·-•·-·-----.. ------·--------·"' __ . _________ ,,, ____ ,.,,.,,,, --·---------·---, 336460537 336511450 336797909 336796532 336460835 336726003 336495378 OMV physical OMV Physical ------OMV Exam 7/17/19 414040 411040 413010 49160 49160 49160 $110.00 $110.00 $110.00 ________________ ,,.,,,,,~.----------·----···--·-------"·-----.,.,,,,. Quant TB & Spec Coll & Prep 121010 49160 $48.00 Quant TB & Spec Coll & Prep 121010 49160 $48.00 --.,_,, _____ ,_,.,, ,,,..,,,,,,,, .. ,,,, ___ ,,_ --·---Quant TB & Spec Coll & Prep 121010 49160 $48.00 ----------~-·---------·-------------------.. -------Quant TB & Spec Coll & Prep 121010 49160 $48.00 Quant TB & Spec Coll & Prep 121010 49160 -~--------,,··~·---------__ , ___ _ $48.00 $35.00 $35.00 $60.00 $60.00 336726005 Non DOT Urine Drug Screen 121010 49160 336460836 Non DOT Urine Drug Screen 121010 49160 --------~-----------------336726004 Preplacement Exam 121010 49160 336460837 Preplacement Exam 121010 49160 -------------·------.-----·--------·-336498909 Chest X-Ray One View 121010 49160 $60.00 ------·-·-··-------·-------·-· -----------------~--·------336496016 Staff Medical Exams 200020 49160 $49.00 ___ ,, ___ ,,,,,,,,_,, .. ,,,, ,,,,,..,,,,,,,, ___ --------,,, ... ,,,,,,.,,,,,,. --_____ . __ ,, __ ,._,,_,_,_. _____ --_,,._,, ___ , .. -,,··-•·-·-,,------·-·-----------------------------· -----,_,,,,,,,,,.,, 336498680 Staff Medical Exams 200020 49160 $48.00 ______ .__,,, ______ .. _,, ____ . ___ ,,.,,,," .. ,,,,,,,,,_, _______ ,, ________ , ____ ,, ,,,,,,,·----•-••,<•<,•--·---·-·--·-.-,.,,,_,, ___________ . -· 336525380 Staff Medical Exams 200020 49160 $49.00 --------··---·---------------------336769083 Staff Medical Exams 200020 49160 $48.00 .....,....,...,.._.,..,, .... ,,.._,,,., ... ~-· Total for Check 407755: $1,828.00 407756 16-Oct-19 665 STOTZ EQUIPMENT P54753 Unit 530: Mower Blade, Spacer, Cap, Lock Pin 413010 47900 $195.87 -------------------------.. -----------------·---------------------·-----------------------407757 16-Oct-19 312 SUPERIOR READY MIX CONCRETE, LP 79383 6.25 tons of concrete 411040 43240 $775.75 -----------------------------~------·------------------,---------407758 16-Oct-19 2086 TANKO STREETLIGHTING, INC ----------------.. -~ ___ , ___________ _ 905318 15-Oct-19 941 U.S. DEPT. OF THE TREASURY 22001 00-PP1 FED WH PE2019-21 FED WH PE2019-21 LED Street and Safety Lighting 80002795 P2790 $76,823.17 FED W/H EFT PE2019-21 F1000 86180 $22,164.66 _____________ _,,,,.__,,_,..,."",_,_,,,,,,,.._~'"'"'" _______________ ,,., __ , ~--FED W/H EFT PE2019-21 F1000 86160 $77,578.02 Total for Check 905318: $99,742.68 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/14/2019 -10/18/2019 Check Number ~ 407759 w 0 """' "-> O') 407760 407761 Check Date Payee/ Vendor# 16-Oct-19 1580 16-Oct-19 655 16-Oct-19 685 UNIFIRST CORPORATION UNITED SITE SERVICES UNIVARUSA Page: 11 of 13 Invoice Number Check Amount 361 0085791 City Hall: mats 415010 41200 $8.41 _ ... , ... -,,_. .. ,, •. -···· ·--·-·-----··-····· 361 0085792 Meadowbrook Gym: mats and mops 415010 41200 $26.31 -·--· __ ,,,, -·· ., ....... _,, .. ,,, ... , ... ,, •.•. -.. -.-·---···· __ ,.,,,,,,,,,,_, 361 0085794 Fire Station 2 mats/towels 501050 49280 $21.89 __________________ ,, ___ ,,,, _________ , ______ _ 361 0085795 Fire Station 3 mats/towels 501050 49280 $43.51 .-----·--···••'>•-···-·-·~-··-·-·---··---·---····-"·"-•"""---·-····-•• .. --•--··-·••----------· •'"'•···---"" ........ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,_., 361 0085793 Fire Station 1 mats/ towels 501050 49280 $29.88 ----···--··••·,,~---···"---------·---··-·""''"''""'•''''' 361 0084979 Customer Services: Uniforms 112010 49280 $10.46 ----------------·•····----·-·--·--··-----------------···"--····-·---···"·""'--·-·-· 361 0085951 Uniforms Weekly Rental Fee 415010 41200 ~..,,~---Y,.....,__ A,,.,"..,_......,,,,»., A,,_,,,,.., __ '"'••~--.,~,;-, ,, ,..,_ 361 0085951 Uniforms Weekly Rental Fee 402060 49280 -------------361 0085950 Uniforms Weekly Rental Fee 402560 49280 $8.54 $24.94 $32.45 361 0085948 Uniforms Weekly Rental Fee 403570 49280 $31.60 ---------~-----.. -·------,---··-·-···--··----"· 361 0085947 Uniforms Weekly Rental Fee 405060 49280 $5.44 361 0085952 Uniforms Weekly Rental Fee 401060 49280 $53.48 ---------------------····-.,,-,,-••-361 0085789 Customer Services: Uniform 112010 49280 $10.46 ----------.,, _____ ,_.,.,,,_, __ "_, _______ , __ 361 0085945 Streets Division: Uniforms 411040 49280 $36 .48 ·---·-···"·•"'··--•·•-,-·--·"·"-•"'"'--•·-····-··------361 0085944 Stormwater: Uniforms 412040 49280 $21.78 --------------·-·------·--···-··•·"'""-"·-·--·-------------------··---•·----361 0085953 North Parks: Uniforms 414040 49280 -----------------------------------------•······---···· 361 0085949 Facilities: Uniforms 415010 49280 --------------------···-··---·-361 0085943 Mats & Uniforms: Fleet 415010 41200 $26.60 $8.83 $8.81 --------------------~O,-••·····---·-·~•-"'"'""'"'•"' 361 0085943 Mats & Uniforms: Fleet 413010 49280 $46.02 $11.37 361 0085955 Twin Peaks Gym: Mats and Mops 415010 41200 ---------~---------···--·----•·-"·""'-•--------361 0085954 Public Works: Mats 415010 41200 $6.45 ------------··-·•··----··---·' ,,, ___ , ___ ,.,,, __ ,,, ___ 361 0085946 Mats & Uniforms: Warehouse 415010 41200 $1.22 ""'·•--·•-·""""'"-"" __ _ 361 0085946 Mats & Uniforms: Warehouse 410060 49280 $4.14 361 0085957 361 0085796 361 0085796 ··-· -.. ---•~:o,,,., ~ .. __,,,,,,,,,,..,,,= Lake Poway Dock: Mats 415010 41200 $9.89 o<'#m_, __ .,_ _ _,,-.,,._-,_.,~.,_..,,_._..._._,,., South Parks: Mats and Uniforms 415010 41200 $32.78 ------------------'"""""""'-·---·---South Parks: Mats and Uniforms 414040 49280 $19.48 -----------------.. ~------·---_______________ .,,,_,,, __ _._, ___ ,,_,,,_,,, __ ,,, 361 0085956 Weekly Mat Service 204020 49280 $9.63 Total for Check 407759: $550.85 114-8915736 Portable Restroom Services 414040 41200 $453.86 114-9231575 Training Tower Restroom 501050 47900 $135.21 114-9243486 BS Portable Services 10/04/19-10/31/19 207020 41200 $268.71 ___ ,,, _ _,,.,,,,.,, .. ,,, ______ ,,,_,._,_,, ___ ~ ----·--------·---~----------Total for Check 407760: $857.78 SD804694 Liquid Permanganate, 10/09/19, 5 lbs. 402060 45200 $22,324.45 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/14/2019 -10/18/2019 Check Check Payee/ Number Date Vendor# Name ...a. 407762 16-Oct-19 253 UPS ~ ·-··· ······--•·•·•· -~-•-,.=,,-0 407763 16-Oct-19 1612 USAFACT, INC. -ti ~, . .,,,,.-~,----~" I\) 407765 en 16-Oct-19 321 VERIZON WIRELESS 407766 16-Oct-19 321 VERIZON WIRELESS Invoice Number 65V940409 9100435 9839186307 9839186307 Wireless Services: September 2019 Wireless Services: September 2019 301030 306030 22000 22000 Page: 12of13 $4.98 $25.32 $76.02 $114.03 -----'"• -•--••-•••'-•"••-••••-•-•••••••••-w~•-••--••--• . w., ••--••'•><•••-•"••-•••••••••••••••••-••••-•-••-.. ••--,•--•--•••••~.,•••••-••·•-• Total for Check 407765: 9839031961 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 400060 22000 $190.05 $38.01 $114.03 -----------------------··,--·-·--···--··--·•-····-.. ----------9839031961 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 401060 22000 9839031961 9839031961 9839031961 9839031961 9839031961 9839031961 9839031961 9839031961 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 401060 33011 402060 22000 ----······--•··--··~-·····----·-·-·---------·--~·-··-.. ---·«---• 402060 402560 402560 33011 $9.09 -----------· ·-·-·-----•-······· ..... -22000 33011 $266.07 $5.67 ···•·•"·------···--~-----------403570 403570 405060 22000 33011 $152.04 $2.91 22000 $38.01 -------··-----------"""-,-· ,.._,.,.~.,.,, -~~·•,--'~• . .,....,_ -~,.,.,,,.,,..,__-•. .....,...~.--,"'·-9839031961 9839031961 9839031961 9839031961 9839031961 9839031961 9839031961 9839031961 9839031961 9839031961 9839031961 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 410060 411040 412040 33011 $6.93 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 22000 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 22000 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 412040 33011 $76.02 $114.03 ------$0.75 ---~-----•-,,---•">~-•,.--,--~~--••--------------Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 413010 33011 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 414040 22000 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 414040 33011 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 415010 415010 430050 22000 33011 22000 ------·-• .... ····---·--·· -----Cellular Service 08/29/19 -09/28/19 430050 23010 $1.25 $76.02 $22.64 $38.01 -----$38.01 Total for Check 407766: 407767 16-Oct-19 414 VINING WHOLESALE LIGHTING SUPPLY 59131 Stage lamps 204020 47600 $1,168.05 $1,449.18 407768 16-Oct-19 1052 WIMACTEL INC. 407769 16-Oct-19 1520 WITTMAN ENTERPRISES, LLC 407770 16-Oct-19 1979 WM HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC ... ---·---··-·---···-------------59133 000188197 19090574 0458853-2793-7 Stage lamps City Pay Phones: Oct 2019 Ambulance Billing: Sept 2019 HazMat Waste Removal ------~------·-------·----·--·----·---· 204020 47600 Total for Check 407767: 114010 33010 --· .. ·~------·-----·-----------112010 41200 503050 29100 $1,995.53 $3,444.71 $390.00 $3,740.00 $133.42 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/14/2019 -10/18/2019 Check Number _.. 407771 (11 a "' a, Check Date 16-Oct-19 Payee/ Vendor# 1340 PayeeNendor Name Invoice Number WORLDAOVANCEMENT_O_F------13-0-9 ___ _ TECHNOLOGY FOR EMS AND RESCUE Director of Finance Approved: ----..a,--·=~ ... ,,-------------Dale: _~'f::l~/_r_.,,_f' ________ _ Page: 13 of 13 _D_e_s_c,.,,ip_lio_n ___ ~---------•--0 .... rg..,_ ~ Pr;1Ject Check Amount EPCR Software 503050 41200 $1,094.00 Register Total: $1,135,862.53 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2 .Jr. O') Q o Check .,.. Number 407784 The City of Poway Director of Finance Submits the Following Register of Demands for the period 10/21/2019 -10/25/2019 and Recommends its Ratification/Approval: Check Date Payee/ Vendor# 25-Oct-19 506 AO REED &CO Invoice Number 314045 Water Treatment Plant: HVAC repair ···-' ,, '--······ ···--·-··-· ···-··· -·-····-···-·· '-·-······-·-····--,-·-·--·· 95363 HV AC Maintenance 95673 HVAC Maintenance 95674 HVAC Maintenance 407785 25-Oct-19 196 AIRGAS USA, LLC 9965517003 CO2 Tank Rental 415010 415010 206020 204020 43020 43020 43020 43020 Run Date: 31-Oct-19 Check Amount $899.17 $400.00 $1,078.66 $2,674.67 -------------· ··-. ---· ....... ____ ,., -Total for Check 407784: $5,052.50 203020 49360 --•·"---•-·-"··-· ,...,,,_.,._,,,,.., ____ ~•,..,,. '"'""•----------•=•----------.-,..-<"A,S ... _,,.,~_,~.,,-~.,. •----«•-•««, ...... , .... ,_,,,,,.,,,,, .. , ,,,._ ____ , __ , .. ,,., •"-""""•"' --•••·•• $115.95 $115.95 $174.05 $150.65 $556.60 )> 407786 25-Oct-19 196 AIRGAS USA, LLC 9965519640 9093911124 9094060915 9093972003 CO2 Tank Rental 203020 49360 203020 45200 Pool Carbon Dioxide Pool Carbon Dioxide ---·-··---•··•-······--·· -"" •''"·-•-·-·--·"'-'""'''"-'""'•'' 203020 45200 Total for Check 407785: Welding Supplies for Unit 71 Small Tools 401060 45600 $94.21 --1 "'"" .... ,. ---""'''--·-·-·----... ______________ ,, ___ ,_, __ ,.,, ___ , ____ ,,,,.,_,,_,,_,, ----·--------1 407787 25-Oct-19 7 )> 0 •«·--· ----.. --.. ----·--···-------------~---·----:::c 407788 25-Oct-19 10 ~" 407789 -25-Oct-19 •·· 21 ··•· z --1 m 407790 25-Oct-19 835 407791 25-Oct-19 835 407792 25-Oct-19 835 407793 25-Oct-19 835 407794 25-Oct-19 835 407795 25-Oct-19 835 ALERT-ALL CORPORATION 219092048 Community Relations -Fire Department Stickers ·-----------------------..... _,._,, ________ _ AMERICAN BACKFLOW SPECIAL TIES INC INV50873 Backflow repair parts ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES 1619962 Coffee, Creamers, and Sugars 1619963 Lake Coffee Service 502050 402560 400060 202020 49040 43080 47600 47600 $107.75 $310.67 $453.18 $29.28 -~--·-------------_,,_,.,.,,,,,..,,~,,.,,,_.,.,,.,..~-~-,·--"',<'•,.~-,,..,,_,,.,._,,,.,,.,..._ . .._.,.~ __ ,.., __ ,,.,.,,,,,._.,."" ..... ,, .. ,.,, .•••.• ., .•• , .... ,,,_, ,,._,. AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T 13726111 13726121 13726119 13726116 13726122 13726115 BAN 9391026535 09/10/19 -10/09/19 BAN 9391026548 09/10/19 -10/09/19 BAN 9391026546 09/10/19 -10/09/19 ---BAN 9391026541 09/10/19 -10/09/19 BAN 9391026549 09/10/19 -10/09/19 BAN 9391026540 09/10/19-10/09/2019 414040 430050 423040 Total for Check 407789: 22000 22000 22000 $482.46 $19.56 $21.22 $21.22 $21.22 $21.22 $21.22 ---------,. __ .. , _______ ,, __ ,,,_, _____ _ 413010 402060 33011 22000 407796 25-Oct-19 835 407797 25-Oct-19 835 407798 25-Oct-19 835 407799 25-Oct-19 835 407800 25-Oct-19 835 407801 25-Oct-19 835 407802 25-Oct-19 835 407803 25-Oct-19 835 AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T 13726112 13727684 13726358 BAN 9391026536 09/10/2019-10/09/2019, Plant Modems BAN 9391064044 09/10/19-10/09/19 Foundation Fax BAN 9391031633 09/10/19-10/09/19 ,,.,. _ _,_ .. -·------··----·~----.. --,-.. ---·--~---------BAN 9391026547 09/10/19 -10/09/19 BAN 9391063084 04/03/19-05/02/19 204020 205020 400060 33010 33010 33010 $21.38 $21.75 $40.79 $40.79 ----=m•----•••-~•-,=-~•-•----,~-•--•~•-•-208020 22000 13726120 12989634 13726113 13727102 ---·-----------, .. ---., .. ,._, __ ~----·"-•""' -·------13726124 BAN 9391026537 09/10/19-10/09/19 BAN 9391053607 09/10/19-10/09/19 BAN 9391026566 09/10/19-10/09/19 205020 33010 202020 33010 501050 33010 $60.63 $80.08 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/21/2019 -10/25/2019 Check Number Check Date Payee/ Vendor# Page: 2 of 11 Invoice Number ....1. 407804 25-Oct-19 2116 BALANCE HYDROLOGICS, INC 219081-0919 Rattlesnake Creek 80002314 P2310 $16,102.50 $3,726.00 $732.00 ...... ---~-"·'-"•" ------------,--·-·-·"-"" ____ ,------·-·~--,------"---'---·---··-·--,-I\) en 407805 25-Oct-19 38 BARRETT ENGINEERED PUMPS 115500 Sludge Pump (Pony Pump) for WTP 402060 47600 407806 25-Oct-19 1489 BENETRAC 708563 Employee Benefit Mgmt. System: October 2019 F1000 87399 ---------------------------------------------------· -----_____ ,, _______________ ,, ___ -----·------·--407772 407807 407808 407776 407809 407810 407811 407812 407813 407814 407815 407816 407817 ----·--407820 407818 407821 25-Oct-19 999996 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA PW18003600.2 Refund for Service 10/16/18 22320 FY20 Boot Allowance: Matias 503050 77550 $1,202.39 $200.00 25-Oct-19 408 25-Oct-19 1498 BOOT WORLD INC BRAINSHINE -···---·-•-»•---·----·--·-·•-· ,,,_.,,, ________________ _ 414040 200020 49280 17999 25-Oct-19 999998 CAIN, ZACHARY 25-Oct-19 1211 25-Oct-19 788 25-Oct-19 1479 -· 25-Oct-19 373 25-Oct-19 1094 25-Oct-19 1623 25-Oct-19 82 25-Oct-19 1309 25-Oct-19 488 25-Oct-19 1493 25-Oct-19 424 25-Oct-19 567 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS INC. CALPERS CIRO'S LANDSCAPING INC. COAST RECREATION, INC. ---·----... ·--•--. .. COMMERCIAL AQUATIC SERVICES CORE & MAIN LP CORODATA RECORDS MANAGEMENT INC. CORODATA SHREDDING, INC. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM DISCOVERY BENEFITS INC. D-MAX ENGINEERING INC .,. _ _.......,.,,,,. ______ --~---,~---·' -ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO Graphic Artist Winter Community Services Guide 4315 ---·--·--··---------$3,700.00 $250.00 $900.00 10/19 -Cain 16017 100000015821327 100000015821331 100000015821333 Tuition Reimbursement: Fireline S-223 Annual Opacity Testing One-Time Setup Fee: Deduction Service (Cigna HMO) One-Time Setup Fee: Deduction Service 121010 413010 121010 121010 14040 41200 17999 $75.00 17999 $75.00 (Cigna PPO) ,_;.,__::;;_ __ ..,;._ __________ -----· .. --------------·-,.,,.,,_ .. , .. ._,_, .. ,, .. ,, ____ .. ____ ·-One-Time Setup Fee: Deduction Service 121010 17999 $75.00 Total for Check 407810: $225.00 12512 Fire Station #1: irrigation system 501050 41600 $823.34 $309.36 --------~------------------.-·----------12505 Landscape Maintenance 204020 41600 12505 12505 12505 12505 12505 13164 119-5383 L303419 RS4529982 DN1243144 20CTOFPON02 0001064656-IN 5226 ''""' .,.,_,,,.,.,,,_. ...... -~..,...,.--,,,, 101419 ,.,,.,,,,.,...,.,.,,,n,-•, ""'-••---• '--.-,_..._,,, . ..,,.,,.,,.__,,,,. '"-'M'" «, Landscape Maintenance 206020 41600 Landscape Maintenance 402060 41600 Landscape Maintenance 414040 41600 --~~-----------------$464.08 $356.61 $1,624.23 $1,417.25 $309.36 Landscape Maintenance 501050 41600 Landscape Maintenance 504050 41600 Total for Check 407811 • $5,304.23 Landscape structure parts 414040 43160 $363.25 Bulk Chlorine 203020 45200 $562.27 Ball Valve F5100 81350 $1,055.95 , ___ , ____ ,"'-"" .,..,.............._--~--.----· -~,,,.__,,-.,.,.. /4"'-"".-"""""',_..,,..,_~,v¼.,,...,.,....,__......_,_,,w,...,.,_,..._"""'-'-,-.., ..__.,, Records Storage 09/01/19-09/30/19 101010 41200 $1,102.33 Records Shredding 09/01/19-09/30/19 101010 41200 $155.11 >~= ,,.,......._.._,_..,,,,.,v"'«•-v>W~".<-"«,•••,,,_~-'>,.,.,._,•~-....c•= ,,-_. 800 MHz Network Radios & Terminals Aug 114010 43180 $9,012.42 2019 ,..,.,-=•« ,,..,.,_,,.w,m~w,, ___ , Cobra & FSA Monthly: September 2019 F1000 87399 $426.00 Jurisdictional Runoff Mgmt. Plan -September 308040 41200 $3,809.00 2019 -...,.-,. --,~----~----·-=··--" -September 2019 -Homeshare & Community 80002413 P2410 $1,338.51 Connect November 19, 2019, Item #1.2Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/21/2019 -10/25/2019 Check Check Payee/ Number Date Vendor# Name ..I. 407822 25-Oct-19 440 ESCONDIDO METAL SUPPLY Invoice Number R-14 Pomerado Reservoir Rehab 402060 Page: 3 of 11 9.~L~~tCF.• '""~er,~l;:~!,,,,c,~~~~.~:~.~~unt 43080 $261.83 cc, ___ -··· 720303 8480653 8527462 0 .... I\) en 407823 25-Oct-19 350 EWING IRRIGATION 407824 25-Oct-19 1189 EYE/COMM, INC. 407825 25-Oct-19 116 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 407826 25-Oct-19 1930 FIREFIGHTER'$ BOOKSTORE -N••-""v••--•-..,.....,.,.,,.,,..-,.,_-.,_..,_, 407827 25-Oct-19 1380 FLYERS ENERGY LLC Lake Poway: irrigation supplies 414040 4 7700 $178.64 '----------------,-----------------··•··-·--· ··•---,--------<-, ,, ,----·----•----. --------·--·· ,,,, ..• ,,,. _______ ,.,,.,. _,,, ......... ., ... ---53047 52880 0692914 Silverset: irrigation supplies 414040 47700 Total for Check 407823: TPM19-001 Extended Public Noticing 301030 41200 TIM 19-003 Extended Public Noticing 301030 41200 Total for Check 407824: Cap and Chain F5100 81350 -~----··-------.,·--,--,·-------._,.,, ....... ,,,","'""''"'''"""'"'"""" ·-·-•"""•-·-,-·-····-Distribution Maintenance Truck Parts 402560 43080 Metate Meter 402560 43080 ---------------------------·--·-·-•--.. ----,---------0693463 Whispering Tree Repair 402560 43080 ···--· -_______ ,,_ ------·-·· ----------····-, 7979605-1 Drinking Fountains 415010 47600 -------------·--· ----~-----~-,-•--···-------•------··----------·-···----·-------Total for Check 407825: INV324326 New Hire Books 501050 49220 CFS-2066937 Safety Services 9/18-9/29 Fuel $895.84 $1,074.48 $299.27 $263.56 $562.83 $391.56 $43.11 $188.84 $2,519.11 $6,201.36 $9,343.98 -----·------~-----------------~------413010 503050 31020 77550 $453.76 $510.76 $250.00 407773 25-Oct-19 999996 ___ ,.,,.,,,, __ •--..----=N<> 407828 25-Oct-19 483 407829 25-Oct-19 123 407830 25-Oct-19 127 407831 25-Oct-19 402 GARDNER, KIMBERLY PW18002557 Refund for Service 07 /25/18 HANSON AGGREGATES PACIFIC 2059484 Summerfield 3.28 tons of asphalt 411040 45900 SOUTHWEST, INC ---------------------------·--·---··--·----,,-,_·_· ,., ---··· ·-···----······,----.. $200.95 $170.93 2060468 Various locations 2.79 tons of asphalt HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS INC 004J7077 004K0180 HAWTHORNE MACHINERY CO HEAL TH DIMENSIONS PS000869002 17145 Check Valve, 3", Inv# 004J6009 Credit Caustic Air Diaphragm Pump Unit 924 -Red Fleet Tube, Seal, Bolt Health & Benefits Fair 2019 411040 45900 ~~--------··•·••<· .. ------•' ...... .. Total for Check 407828: $371.88 402060 47600 402060 61999 Total for Check 407829: 413010 47900 ($377.83) $2,814.09 $2,436.26 $73.72 -----~~ --·•·•--~---~----,.~--.-•··-·· ----"'···-··~-·----·--·-· ""'""~·---121010 14050 $962. 75 ---------·-------------------------·-· 407832 25-Oct-19 152 HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL ACCOUNT 6211923 Crew Truck Parts 402560 43080 $99.02 9211910 Distribution Maintenance Truck Parts 402560 43080 $112.23 --------------------------··-~-----·--····"---·"-··-~-"""·--·----·----3211878 Valve Repair Parts, Concrete Tool 402560 45600 $35.31 0220230 9220233 224497 4559298 1220217 4220255 -----------------........ ,. _____ ,,..,_ ''"-'•---·•·-•---·--··-Work Order 226417: repair supplies 415010 4 7600 $8.38 ---Tarp 412040 47600 $82.90 Repair supplies Battery Tech Tool Storage Primer/Supplies for New Gate 14215 Bounty Way 412040 415010 204020 403570 47600 45600 45600 43080 $3.74 $117.45 $29.60 $50.49 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/21/2019 -10/25/2019 Check Number ....1. 407832 (0 0 .... "-> a, Check Date 25-Oct-19 Payee/ Vendor# 152 HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL ACCOUNT Invoice Number 0220143 1220216 1220216 8220009 8220010 8220012-2019 9211861 9211862 Tarps to Cover Equipment Lake Small Tools & Dock Supplies ----·······-·•··-··-· ····•···-··•··-·-Lake Small Tools & Dock Supplies 403570 43080 202020 45600 202020 47600 Page: 4 of 11 Check Amount $34.29 $300.00 $240.03 ·-----•··-··-·-·-----··--·----------------·-··--···--··-•··-····-··--··· -· .. OPP Park Supplies 205020 47600 --~----·•-·----····---·-··~··--·-·---·-·-·-·----Refund OPP Park Supplies 205020 47600 OPP Park Supplies 205020 47600 OPP Rendezvous Supplies 205020 47600 Refund OPP Rendezvous Supplies 205020 47600 $223.02 ($202.57) $43.08 $121.76 ($66.97) ··-----·---~---------.,,_,,,.~,-,,,,_,.,, . ..,__.,,_, -~,>-♦>MSW___,,-,.~ 407833 407834 25-Oct-19 793 25-Oct-19 1529 HUME & COMPANY INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING CORPORATION 4220248 5211928 8220293 305269 11984 905322 21-Oct-19 1750 JUST CONSTRUCTION INC 21800272-Release -----"···----------------·•-···•---·~-------~-------407835 25-Oct-19 161 KRC ROCK INC 2244212-00 407836 25-Oct-19 737 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 9307103502 407837 25-Oct-19 391 LIFE-ASSIST, INC. 945929 943065 943365 Work Order 230845 repair supplies Work Order 230851: repair supplies Gate Paint 14215 Bounty Way Sheriffs Station: termite treatment Treatment Plant Engineering Design Espola Road Project 3/4" Crushed Rock Drum Modular Containments for the Crosthwaite Yard EMS Supplies 415010 47600 415010 47600 403570 43080 Total for Check 407832: 415010 41200 80005106 P5100 80004200 P0000 402060 47600 80002574 P2570 503050 47400 EMS Supplies 503050 47400 -----··-··--···•···-·"·--------------EMS Supplies 503050 47400 $51.29 $15.33 $36.34 $1,334.72 $1,075.00 $2,795.00 $400,000.00 $4,598.77 $2,291.30 $506.82 EMS Supplies 503050 47400 $1,517.93 ---•--•-••-•••-•••-•~-•••••-"• ----~ -----·• -~••• •---• »,-,_•,>•--•-W<H-••-••• EMS Supplies 503050 47400 $1,055.61 945853 947461 947342 ------····-·--·---·· ·-· ,...,..-.. .... ~--------,,.....,,_..._,.,.._._,,._,._,..,..,. 407774 25-Oct-19 999996 LISICKY, TERA PW18003600.2(2) , .... ,,...,=~----...,,,. ,_'-""=,.,_,,_ ... ,,_, 407777 25-Oct-19 999998 MANN, DIANE 10/19 -Mann 905326 25-Oct-19 616 MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS TRUST CO.BANK 457 PPE 10/20/19 .,...,, .-.---a<•,,,.------~ _,,,,.,.. --~~ .. ,,,. ,,.,. ,.,,..~_,, ,.,...,,,_ -~~-,,.,,,,,.,., ..__,,_,,_ ,,.,,,.__,,......,_.,,,...._._.,., '-"'" 905327 25-Oct-19 616 MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS TRUST CO. BANK 457R PPE 10/20/19 --------~· _,, ______ ,, .. 905328 25-Oct-19 616 MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS TRUST CO. BANK 401A PPE 10/20/19 905329 25-Oct-19 616 MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS TRUST CO. BANK ROTH PPE 10/20/19 EMS Supplies 503050 47400 $332.65 Total for Check 407837: $4,422.13 Refund for Service 10/16/18 503050 77550 $100.00 ·-·•-···· ··---·-·--·· ·---······•·-······--------~....,,,,,..,,...,.,,y••-Y•--~·•A--'"" ~ • ••-,--~-,-.-•••-,¥," •~•~•,-A Per Diem MMASC Annual Conference ICMA 457 deferred comp deductions PPE 10/20/19 ROTH 457 deferred comp PPE 10/20/19 401A employer contributions PPE 10/20/19 ROTH IRA employee contributions PPE 10/20/19 410060 F1000 F1000 F1000 F1000 14010 $150.75 86120 $70,035.31 86120 $2,814.00 86130 $11,438.36 86220 $225.00 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/21/2019 -10/25/2019 Check Number Check Date Payee/ Vendor# N 905330 25-Oct-19 616 MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS TRUST CO. BANK 0 Page: 5 of 1 i ••=<~•-•,?,~~"'•N · _<:>~je_~t Retirement Health Savings Plan (Safety)PPE10/20/19 RHS PPE 10/20/19 F1000 87004 a . 407775 . , ·2s:.·o·~t~ 19 ___ 9999_9_6 __ M_A_TT_H_I_E_S_, c-o-uii:N_E _______ ---------~---····-•· ·•·p····w19000560 Refund for Service 02/14/19 503050 77550 $1,592.10 $1,233.39 N-----------------"'·-····-------------------_____ ., _________________________ _ O> 407838 25-Oct-19 156 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 407839 25-Oct-19 170 MIRAMAR BOBCAT INCORPORATED 407840 25-Oct-19 175 NAPA AUTO PARTS/POWAY 407841 25-Oct-19 411 NATIONAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE, INC 407842 25-Oct-19 2044 NATIONWIDE MEDICAL SURGICAL INC 407843 25-Oct-19 1392 NV5 INC. 407844 25-Oct-19 84 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION 407845 25-Oct-19 1763 01 CORPORATION ------·--··-,----------"'--------------------~-25-Oct-19 233 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS 18212179 R19757 Compressor Parts Loader rental 405060 43080 $190.64 ------------------------------~-------------·--· 412040 49360 ---···· •·-····· ----------. ·---...... -----------···•··---------·------~------------.. -------·-·····-----$1,686.54 $109.10 404630 405309 79381 Equipment maintenance supplies Nuts and screws DOT Testing: September 2019 412040 47600 411040 45300 Total for Check 407840: 121010 49160 $4.31 $113.41 $553.52 ----··· --·-···-··-----•-----------------------·-----------~----------------------·-·••--·-·---·----------··· .. --------1051214 ALS Medications 503050 47400 $1,257.73 139655 Design Services 80004200 P0000 $25,466.40 -------------------------------------------··-··------·----··-··-··--· ·-·· ·····-·-·--·""""""""" 368673703-001 Office Supplies 203020 47100 $173.91 -----------------·•---------------------------------------•-•-<·•----359214360-001 389393155-001 389393155-001 389393155-001 389393155-001 375794864-001 Office Supplies 203020 47100 $90.28 ______ ,, ............ --.•--·-----------------------------------,----·-------~--,--------,-------Office Supplies 122010 47100 $16.37 Office Supplies 121010 47100 $23.02 ---------------..--------_________________ ,, _____________________ , _______ ,, _________________ , ____________ , Office Supplies 121010 14030 $44.17 Office Supplies 122010 47500 Office Supplies 112010 47100 ------~--------------······-----•--···· 388917118-001 Office Supplies 114010 47100 $56.40 ($23.26) $113.11 $4.36 ............ _,_" ___________________________ _ 388917118-001 Office Supplies 114010 4 7600 «---·------•-""-·· ~------.. ,,-.... .---------·----------.----~--·-·---··•-•"'-•---------------388917118-001 Office Supplies 111010 47100 $38.36 --------------------------------------------···--·-··-·--·• ~--388917118-001 Office Supplies 112010 47100 $15.41 388917118-001 Office Supplies 113010 47100 $5.82 -----------~-----------------~-~--------~-----.. ------------------·-_____ ,, _______ ,. __ , 391779152-001 Office supplies -PCPA 204020 47100 $158.75 Total for Check 407844: $716.70 --·---------~-234339 Chemical Reagents for Analyzers 402060 47600 $287.53 ~-~,-,., . .,.,.,.., ... .___,, ..... ...._ --~--""",,-.,,,_ S6283640.001 PS-12 HMI (Reclaim) Electrical Parts 405060 43080 $947.12 407846 407783 407847 25-Oct-19 999988 ONE-TIME SENIOR VOLUNTEER PATROL Shope 10-14-19 14 Mic/Earbud como earpieces for SVP Radios 80007795 P7790 $422.24 ·--·----------·--·------------------· -----------25-Oct-19 430 ORKIN EXTERMINATING, INC. 189383470 Big Stone Lodge -October 2019 309030 41200 $103.65 -"""·:,;,,,.-_,,,.....,,.._""·-·--·,.,,--.""'""-'•"---;---.<-,..,. ....... __ 188202415 Big Stone Lodge -September 2019 309030 41200 $103.65 Total for Check 407847: $207.30 407782 25-Oct-19 999995 PACIFIC SWIM SWIM TEAM 2014053.001 Deposit Refund Permit 22330 202020 74710 $200.00 407848 25-Oct-19 194 PARKHOUSE TIRE INC 3010304938 Unit 925 -Red Fleet 413010 47900 $1,782.15 November 19, 2019, Item #1.20 -I\ I\) en Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/21/2019 -10/25/2019 Page: 6 of 11 Check Check Payee/ Number Date Vendor# 25-Oct-19 689 407850 25-Oct-19 220 ... ,_ •--•-••-...-.,,-~ .. WW-407851 25-Oct-19 747 407852 25-Oct-19 25 407853 25-Oct-19 1721 407854 25-Oct-19 1058 407780 25-Oct-19 999995 407856 25-Oct-19 200 407778 25-Oct-19 999998 407857 25-Oct-19 638 407858 25-Oct-19 230 ..... ,....., ___ 407860 25-Oct-19 221 PARS 43909 Monthly Admin Fee: Aug 2019 F1000 PETTY CASH GENERAL 10/21/19 (Clerk) Reimburse General Petty Cash 10/21/19 100010 14010 $77.32 -----~---·· ··------------·---·-· .. ------------••·•--·-····--"'•·•--<•·-··•--·---·--•-···-----··•-···-·•··•'"•'--•····"••··-•,,.--.. ,·,.-, 10/21/19 (GMO) Reimburse General Petty Cash 10/21/19 103010 31010 $30.00 -~-·"'-=----,-----·-----·--·'·----------·-·~--·-·---·-·'"-••-.... ----·---------·~--~-~-·-·---·-~-10/21/19 (GMO) Reimburse General Petty Cash 10/21/19 104030 14010 $12.00 ~·-------· _,,,._,,..~~"'"""-•"""-'-•.;,••--10/22/19 (HR) Reimburse General Petty Cash 10/22/19 121010 76170 $78.00 ,... .. _,,•,~•, ,-,,>.<,r=•=-=•-M~• • •""-~" w ""'"~' •~ >->w 10/22/19 (HR) Reimburse General Petty Cash 10/22/19 122010 31010 $15.08 -----•··----···-· -------·-· ------10/22/19 (CSD & DSD) Reimburse General Petty Cash 10/22/19 200020 14010 $73.55 ______ ,,,, ........ , -· -----··----·······-·-· 10/22/19 (CSD & DSD) Reimburse General Petty Cash 10/22/19 200020 14010 $65.70 ·---···•······ .•... ,. .. ,,. ___ .,. ..••... ,, .. ____ . _______ ...•.....••..... , __________ _ 10/22/19 (CSD & DSD) Reimburse General Petty Cash 10/22/19 301030 31010 $15.66 •·----'•·--······---10/22/19 (CSD & DSD) Reimburse General Petty Cash 10/22/19 305030 31010 $15.66 Total for Check 407850: $382.97 PLUMBERS DEPOT INC. PD-42585 CCTV Mainline Video Camera Repair Unit 25 403570 43080 $2,962.98 ----------------POWAY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING 10142019 ARTS FOUNDATION Poway OnStage Weekly Ticket Sale Transfer F1000 86330 $9,999.00 ----·---· '''"·-·-····--·-•--··-·-••··•··-PROACTIVE ENGINEERING INC R & B PINTO PROPERTIES LLC RAMOS, BRYANAH RAYNE WATER CONDITIONING RICE, JASON 16018 LKCONC-10/07-10/13 2014054.001 8303-10/17-11/13/19 10/19-Rice Engineering Services -Poway D Wkly Lk Cone 10/07/19-10/13/19 Deposit Refund Permit #22484 402060 F1000 202020 17200 $339.66 86360 $2,397.39 .'<,..-...,•-VN,Y..'AA• '""'»--~ .. --.,,,.,.,. •,•,-,..,,_,_,.,,.~,-,S-• 74710 $182.00 ---~---·"····--••<-•·•"·•-·---·-----·-··-------------Pool Water Conditioning Reimbursement: D5 Exam Fees 203020 401060 41200 $152.82 49240 $155.00 ROCHESTER MIDLAND CORPORATION INV00147624 Bathroom scent 415010 41400 $704.49 RUTAN AND TUCKER SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 848527 14532248918-10/19 0704 7022786-10/19 95321310795-10/19 70195729909-10/19 37750258723-10/19 012782-0029 Professional Service through 8/31/2019 13094 Civic Center Dr. 08/31/19-9/30/19 12335 Crosthwaite 09/10/19-1/09/19 Training Tower 14322 Pomerado Rd 09/09/19-10/08/19 FS3 102010 203020 501050 501050 12150 1/2 Sage View Road 09/09/19 -10/08/19 425040 13725 Poway Road 09/10/19 -10/09/19 430050 17010 $1,058.00 21010 $8,467.44 .,,,.~_,,.,,,.,. ______ =..,--, 21010 $2,568.74 ... --~~----------, 21010 $4,283.07 ,__,'YS••--•o>N ___ A_ ---•••-• •~ ••• • •-•,u 21010 $11.90 21020 $59.74 ...... ,_ .. ______________ . _________ _ ¼, ___ • ...,._, ___ ->-=,.,_,_,_,... .. ~.,-,-. --«·• 86797737652-10/19 32430844182-10/19 11183824070-10/19 41639610229-10/19 13250 Pomerado Road 09/09/19 -10/08/19 14022 1/2 Pomerado 09/09/19 -10/08/19 16275 Espola Road 09/10/19 -10/09/19 15001 Highway 67 09/10/19 -10/09/19 414040 414040 414040 414040 59531914804-10/19 13053 Poway Road 09/10/19-10/09/19 104030 ,,,. .. ,----..,---·-·,,..,.. .... ~-•.,.,.,.,,..,,.,, ... ...,,, ... ,. 93262241491-10/19 12670 1/2 Pomerado Road 09/11/19-10/10/19 430050 32089688823-10/19 13090 Civic Center Dr 09/10/19-10/09/19 208020 21010 $11.90 _____ _,.,.,. --~ •·--~-.. _ •?••----·~ 21010 $11.39 21010 $10.00 21010 $10.00 41200 $74.85 21020 $54.40 21010 $322.30 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/21/2019 -10/25/2019 Check Number I\) 407860 I\) 0 -ti I\) a, Check Date 25-Oct-19 221 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC Invoice Number 2648032724 7 -10/19 48262466316-10/19 99580161733-10/19 82033128582-10/19 82058271564-10/19 23194668909-10/19 25808256922-10/19 48301450768-10/19 48731411075-10/19 71260928749-10/19 3732576307 4-10/19 12250 1/2 Meadowbrook Lane 09/09/19-10/08/19 12490 1/2 Old Pomerado 09/11/19 -10/10/19 14135 Midland Rd 09/12/19-10/13/19 13325 Civic Center Dr: 09/10/19-10/09/19 14467 Lake Poway Road 09/10/19 -10/09/19 12325 Crosthwaite Circle 09/10/19 -10/09/19 14445 Lake Poway Rd 09/10/19-10/09/19 14283 Silver Ridge Road 09/10/19 -10/09/19 201020 414040 205020 114010 400060 410060 410060 414040 21010 21010 21010 21010 21010 21010 21010 21010 Page: 7 of 11 ~~~j~~t•x• Check Amount $1,263.62 $86.74 $58.45 $25,188.49 $1,811.86 $156.37 $1,937.23 $11.64 -----------·-------------•------------------·-------------------,----------------12900 Twin Peaks Rd. 09/12/19 -10/13/19 414040 21010 $11.90 15003 1/2 Pomerado Road 09/12/19 -10/13/19 414040 21010 $10.00 ------------••-~"'-"'"~--~----~ -1,,.,.,,,,,,. . .,.."-.,, . ..,_,._,_,..,,_.,,,,_.,,,,_.,,._~,,,w,~•·~,~-. .,..,..,~ .--,• •••••••••-•••"•'"'"•"•-•-•~---· 12207 Old Pomerado Road 09/10/19-10/09/19 414040 21010 $24.08 -------------------------------------------------------------------------•--. 15011872037-10/19 93224921321-10/19 99522976016-10/19 937 46846063-10/19 89922224091-10/19 83800796106-10/19 824 75997643-10/19 15401 1/2 Pomerado Road 09/13/19 -10/14/19 430050 21020 ----------·---------~----14103 1/2 Stowe Drive 09/10/19-10/09/19 420140 21010 14401 Pomerado Road 09/12/19 -10/13/19 414040 21010 ~-,..,.,_...._,... . ..., . ._ ___ _ 13743 1/2 Carriage Road 09/12/19-10/13/19 414040 -----14038 Midland Road A 09/12/19-10/13/19 414040 14155 1/2 Pomerado Road SPK 09/12/19 -10/13/19 414040 21010 21010 21010 13306 1/2 Midland Road 09/12/19 -10/13/19 414040 21010 $10.86 $11.90 $750.51 $180.13 $121.79 $11.64 $38.84 ---------.. ,·-----~-------------------~-----------------~-~--....... ~-----·--82465424855-10/19 71205215723-10/19 64025166945-10/19 32222332511-10/19 14795 1/2 Silverset St. 09/12/19-10/13/19 13221 Midland Road A 09/12/19 -10/13/19 13544 Aubrey Street 09/12/19 -10/13/19 14560 Lake Poway Rd 09/10/19-10/09/19 414040 21010 414040 21010 414040 21010 202020 21010 $373.69 $52.51 ----$1,226.65 Total for Check 407860: $664.46 $49,889.09 407859 25-Oct-19 218 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC/SUNDRY 36194890059-09/19 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 208020 21010 $6,386.73 $1,416.74 36194890059-09/19 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 36194890059-09/19 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 36194890059-09/19 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 36194890059-09/19 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 36194890059-09/19 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 36194890059-09/19 36194890059-09/19 36194890059-09/19 36194890059-09/19 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 -·"'----~-----------~-----203020 21010 204020 21010 $255.73 205020 21010 $355.56 ----------413010 21010 $1,324.72 402560 21010 $12.15 $925.42 $58.62 $88.34 414040 421040 423040 424040 21010 -----________ _, 21010 21010 -----------------... ,. _ _., ........ . 21010 $11.11 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/21/2019 -10/25/2019 Check Number Check Date Payee/ Vendor# P,:i,11::u::,[\/~,nrl,-.r Name Invoice Number ,,>,,•:=,'<'·'C·d,,'CC',"2:•z,C,w:"°Daffi::C"'""""''""'"'"''''''·''-'%"-,'.:o,m;,""""'·w,~'7"'..1'<.=-<"½,ec:a~.,C.•><:C".'-OcO,bC",''l.;P<<''.?"'CC.S'CC.::."':CC""'";,sc,;c,,<;C"C','.0'•,f:< Page: 8of11 N 407859 w 25-Oct-19 218 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC/SUNDRY 36194890059-09/19 36194890059-09/19 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 Group Sundry Bill: Sept 2019 21010 $120.18 0 """' N a, 407781 407861 407862 407779 407863 407864 25-Oct-19 999995 SD BONSAI ASSOCIATION 2014040.001 999995 SD BONSAI ASSOCIATION 2014039.001 25-Oct-19 256 SENTRY FENCE COMPANY 5668 5663 5669 Parking Pass Refund Permit 22224 Deposit Refund Permit 22224 Gate Installed on Sewer Easement for Maint. Access Gate Installed on Sewer Easement for Maint. Access Stowe and Pomerado: fence repair 202020 202020 403570 403570 414040 21020 Total for Check 407859: --~ ------------~--.-72360 Total for Check 407781: 74710 Total for Check 407781: 43080 43080 41200 Total for Check 407861: $2,197.30 $13,152.60 $140.00 $340.00 $200.00 "--"-··~--$340.00 $600.00 $1,600.00 $900.00 $3,100.00 25-Oct-19 282 SHARP REES-STEALY MEDICAL CENTER 336497064 Quant TB & Spec Coll & Prep 121010 49160 $48.00 $591.00 $591.00 25-Oct-19 999998 SHIELDS, LINDA 25-Oct-19 166 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 827204 336651952 336689288 827210 336651953 Preplacement Exam (Fire) Preplacement Exam (Fire) Preplacement Exam (Fire) 121010 121010 121010 49160 49160 49160 $591.00 Quant TB 121010 49160 $30.00 ~--------:>M•-•••-""''"'" ,,, ,_,,,,,_,,,_,,,,., ____________________ _ Quant TB 12101 O 49160 $30.00 336689289 Quant TB 121010 49160 $30.00 .. ,,,,_._.,,,,,,,_,, _____ , ___ _ 336687870 Hep B Sur AB 121010 49160 $38.00 336651954 336689290 Hep B Sur AB Hep B Sur AB ••-=,~ .. ,. "'"",,,..., .. ,.,.,,.,,." _______ ,,_.,.,~,,.,.,.,..,,..,,.,.,,-,...-...,_,.,.,,,,,.,_._. ______ _ 121010 49160 $38.00 ___ ,,._,,,,,,.,,,,. ···-·-------------121010 49160 $38.00 --·-·----•'"''" ___________ _,,,,,,, __ -,,-~, ,.,,,,, ___ ~·. _._,_, ________ ~. -·····•-•<>>•-·"----336687871 336651955 336689291 Non DOT Urine Drug Screen 121010 49160 $35.00 .... ,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,_,.,,.,,.,_,,,_,_,_,, ___ .,.,,_.,.,, ___ .~--------Non DOT Urine Drug Screen 121010 ------------------·-·-·----·-----Non DOT Urine Drug Screen 336687872 Metabolic Panel & Spec Col & Prep 336619111 O.V., New PT, Detailed Low Complex ------------336619112 CBC W/DIFF & Spec Col & Prep 10/19 -Shields 94528944-001 Mileage Reimbursement: JPIA Educational Forum Irrigation supplies 121010 121010 121010 121010 122010 414040 49160 49160 ________ ,.,,_,,,_,...___,....,._,.,_,,«,,., 49160 49160 $35.00 $35.00 $56.00 $305.00 -----49160 $45.00 -----------Total for Check 407862: $2,536.00 31010 $124.12 47700 $3,751.98 -----------··--.. -·-•·"--"-•••"·•--·----· 25-Oct-19 1997 SONSRAY MACHINERY, LLC P21070-01 Unit 748A-Bumper 413010 47900 $41.20 ·---.----------------------------------------·-···•" ,,.,,.._,.,.,, _______ _ ------····-·· ..... --. ·-···-·-·-·--·"··---•"'"'""'" 407865 25-Oct-19 771 SPECIAL TY ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 7148-561826 Community Park: lights 415010 47600 $226.11 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/21/2019 -10/25/2019 Check Number Check Date -=E:,,,,,,_,,,,,,s;C,' ·''""''""'· ·,c,':.,aS,¾¼I'C'CGP•Cfa """'''''-"''''~-·:,c•,,c,.;.,,'"ie ",-,,·,:oc>.¼.C,>'1C<t"""-"'"'""'''"":',,,,"""""'""''"'""''"''"""''''C:,,&·, ,,,,,, __ , ~ 407866 25-Oct-19 2027 STANDARD CALIBRATIONS, INC. ~ ''" ,,_" ------, -··· ,,._,,,, ___ ,,,,,, ,,,.,, , _____ ,,,. o 407867 25-Oct-19 1420 STERICYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL """' SOLUTIONS Invoice Number INV009663 72402614684 ~ ~"•-,.-•-----~ ---•--~---~-----•••..,.~"---•---•-•> ~•--•-•••••••--••"<•-• ------.-,.~-------•••--•-•--•" """'-" ~••-•'-•• ,n~---•-•"'"••-""""'"'-~.,.... a, 407868 25-Oct-19 1601 SUPERION, LLC 254170 SCBA Flow Testing Annual 402060 41200 Household Hazardous Waste 80002504 P2500 TRAKiT User Licenses (10 Users) 300030 41200 ____ ,,,,_,., _____ ,, __ ,,~·--· ,,,_, •• ,,,,,, __ , ,,,, __ ·-----·· ,,, -, -"'~ ---, ---·----···-··-" , -· -··-,,. --__ ,<_,,,,,,_,. ---··----,.,.,. _ ___,,,, ...... ,_.,...,, .. =_.,_,_"~ ... ,,_,,., ,,,,,,,, ___ ,,,,, .. ,,,,_.,, 407869 407870 25-Oct-19 461 SUPERIOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT INC 11071 Preventative Maintenance 25-Oct-19 1352 SYNCS/AMAZON 8781042209-10/19 8781042209-10/19 8781042209-10/19 Amazon.com Purchases Amazon.com Purchases Amazon.com Purchases 413010 41200 500050 114010 113010 47600 47600 43080 Page: 9 of 11 Check Amount $371.00 $23,351.50 $11,510.12 $185.00 ($8.58) ---------•<-• ---·-·--·~----------···-·----"---------· ---______ ,._ ----------•-·•--•·· -----·•--,,,,,, -______ ,,.,,,,.,,, .. ,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,_.,_, _____ ,,,_, ($2.96) $868.75 ($38.91) $972.17 8781042209-10/19 Amazon.com Purchases 415010 47600 Total for Check 407870: 407871 25-Oct-19 217 TARGET SPECIAL TY PRODUCTS Pl1052352 Rodent control materials 414040 47600 $41.32 ----••=-n>'>'----••~•--•-----,.,._,_. ____ -""• •---✓,_.,.......,_,..,._,_ ________ ----·---· _______ , ---407872 25-Oct-19 2120 TELEFLEX LLC 9501733052 Medical Supplies 503050 47400 $605.13 ____ _,..,,._...,......,,,.._......, _ _,_ _ _.,..,..._.._....,....,,~,v-..-•••=---,-,-,•,,..__,_ ----------_____ ,.,....,,........:.,.,,,.,.,._,,..,,. __ , ________ ,.,.,_....._.....,._, ___ ,,,~,·,··-· .. -·--,,,·=·----407819 25-Oct-19 839 THE MARIDEN CORPORATION Lake Uniforms 202020 49280 $860.10 1226 1230 -----"·-·--------------------------407877 407873 407878 25-Oct-19 1566 25-Oct-19 897 25-Oct-19 2107 1230 U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SVC -7016_10/19 IT U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEM-CS U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEM-DSD 0510-10/19 6264-10/19 City of Poway Branded Apparel City of Poway Branded Apparel Finance/HR CalCard October 2019 CSD CalCard October 2019 DSD CalCard October 2019 ·-----•-•·----·---·-----301030 49280 306030 49280 $242.11 $528.52 Total for Check 407819: $1,630.73 F1000 86020 $8,752.12 F1000 86020 $9,719.31 F1000 86020 $1,871.78 U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEM-LG 407876 25-Oct-19 1513 2521-10/19 CMO/City Clerk CalCard October 2019 F1000 86020 $2,210.10 407875 U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEM-PW 25-Oct-19 1512 6896-10/19 PW CalCard October 2019 ----------------------------,--,, .. ,~---•«•----407874 905331 905332 407879 25-Oct-19 1511 U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEM-SS 25-Oct-19 785 U.S. BANK N.A. _______ ,, _, _______ -25-Oct-19 785 U.S. BANK N.A. 25-Oct-19 1580 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 9376-10/19 Fire CalCard October 2019 PARS ARS PE2019-22 PARS ARS PE2019-22 PARS REP PE2019-22 PARS REP PE2019-22 361 0086593 Fire Station 2 mats/towels 361 0086594 Fire Station 3 mats/towels -----·------361 0086592 361 0086591 361 0086590 361 0086595 361 0086595 Fire Station 1 mats/towels Meadowbrook Gym: mats and mops City Hall: mats -·--_________ _._.,,_,_, _____ South Parks: mats and uniforms South Parks: mats and uniforms F1000 F1000 F1000 F1000 501050 501050 501050 415010 415010 ,,,_.,,,,,_ .. ~----_,..,,,_,,_, _______ 415010 ·--~-----------·-,--414040 86020 86020 87200 87210 49280 49280 49280 41200 41200 41200 49280 $1,412.37 $6,877.89 $2,074.37 $52,624.20 -""-"·~ ,-.,,.,.,.,=--·------~-.--.,~.,·-~·--·--··· _ _,_,.,. ·= $21.89 $43.51 -.......,,,.__..._,__...,.,.,,,_,,_,_~,-•-'<--"""--"''"'""'--· $29.88 $26.31 $8.41 $32.78 $19.48 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2Register of Demands: Warrants from 10/21/2019 -10/25/2019 Check Number I\> 407879 en 0 -ti I\) en 905323 905324 407880 905325 Check Date Payee/ Vendor# 25-Oct-19 1580 22-Oct-19 36 24-Oct-19 36 25-Oct-19 36 24-Oct-19 334 UNIFIRST CORPORATION UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA UNION BANK-SAN DIEGO Invoice Number 361 0086760 Lake Poway Dock: mats 361 0086757 Public Works: mats 361 0086756 North Parks: uniforms 361 0086752 Facilities: uniforms 415010 415010 414040 415010 41200 41200 49280 49280 Page: 10 of 11 Check Amount $9.89 $8.83 -•·=··•·~---,-·,~"·-· --,---------~---··· -~----.-.-•--··-·•··-······-· , .... ·-·--·---"-·--· --···--····"••"'· --.--•--•·-·-··-•·"" 361 0086748 361 0086747 361 0086758 361 0086754 361 0086754 361 0086755 361 0086746 361 0086746 361 0086749 361 0086749 361 0086750 361 0086751 361 0086753 ----361 0086759 94988J5R4 Streets: uniforms Stormwater: uniforms Twin Peaks: mats and mops Uniforms Weekly Rental Fee Uniforms Weekly Rental Fee Uniforms Weekly Rental Fee Mats and Uniforms -Fleet Mats and Uniforms -Fleet Mats and Uniforms -Warehouse Mats and Uniforms -Warehouse Uniforms Weekly Rental Fee Uniforms Weekly Rental Fee 411040 49280 $36.48 412040 49280 $21.78 -------------~--~--~--,,~,. -------·-···-~--.,-"..._ .. ··--415010 41200 415010 41200 402060 401060 415010 413010 415010 410060 405060 49280 49280 41200 49280 41200 49280 49280 ·-·-----·-··-··--------403570 49280 $11.37 $8.54 $37.40 $310.19 $8.81 $46.02 $1.22 $4.14 $5.44 $31.60 Uniforms Weekly Rental Fee 402560 49280 $32.45 ····-·· ., •••• ···-·· ·---< ·-·-·· ---,•-><••·-·---· --··•-<•,.·-·· ·•--<-••· -·---·" --,·-···•-•.-,«·-···"'--·~,.. PCPA Weekly Mat Service 10/17/19 204020 49280 $9.63 --------~----------•--· ....... . Total for Check 407879: $799.10 Purchase Wells Fargo Bank 08/14/23 Maturity F1000 82210 $1,000,000.00 94988J5R4 Purchase Wells Fargo Bank 08/14/23 Maturity F1000 82211 $50,350.00 $6,705.56 -------~-----------··•·-·--·••«--•-"''"'''-·~·----------94988J5R4 Purchase Wells Fargo Bank 08/14/23 Maturity F1000 82290 3133EJFK0 3133EJFK0 3133EJFK0 1175313 PPE 10/20/19 PPE 10/20/19 PPE 10/20/19 Purchase FFCB 03/08/23 Maturity Purchase FFCB 03/08/23 Maturity Purchase FFCB 03/08/23 Maturity Trustee Fees 07/01/19-09/30/19 Transfer net payroll to Union Bank PPE 10/20/19 Transfer net payroll to Union Bank PPE 10/20/19 Transfer net payroll to Union Bank PPE 10/20/19 Total for Check 905323: $1,057,055.56 F1000 82170 $1,000,000.00 ------·---~----···•"''-"""•'•«•" ·-·-·-·-·----·--«•«•<--• F1000 82171 $32,790.00 $3,386.11 F1000 111010 TREA F1000 F1000 82290 Total for Check 905324: $1,036, 176.11 74010 80030 80030 80030 $789.00 $678,024.35 ($678,024.35) $678,024.35 Total for Check 905325: $678,024.35 November 19, 2019, Item #1.2Register of Demands: warrants from 10/21/2019 -10/2512019 Check Number Check Payee/ Dale Vendor# Payea/Vandor Name ------Page: 11of11 Invoice Number --Descript:;;;io:;,;n ____________ ....;O~•~9--...;0b:;;-!.jec:;;:;.t~-·Proj~e~~ounl N 407881 a, 25-Oct-19 655 UNITED StTE SERVICES 114-9074165 114-9274849 114-9310044 Portable RestroornSe,vices 414040 41200 $110.30 a N en 407882 407883 407884 407885 407886 407887 407855 25-Oct-19 246 25-Oct-19 1231 25-Oct-19 1612 25-Oct-19 272 25-0ct-19 540 25-0ct-19 280 25-Oct-19 2090 407888 25-Oct-19 293 407889 25-0cl-19 1573 Blue Sky Portabte s.,, vict<s 10/10/19 Portable Toilets 10/16/19-11/12/19 207020 41200 $57.45 202020 41200 $572.64 Total for Check 407881: $740.39 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 10/21/19 Replenish Poslaga Meter/Acct 0000105426 114010 ______ _;__ ___ _;;__ __________ _ 33020 29000 17999 $3,000.00 UNITED STORM WATER INC. SW35642 FY19 Spoils Remove/Transport 403570 $4,962.92 $37.25 ---------------USAF ACT, INC. 9101840 Background lnvesUgation 121010 WAXIE WEST COAST ARBORISTS. INC. WESTERN MOWER AND ENGINE WESTERN OILFIELDS SUPPLY CO. WOLPERT, JOSEPH ZORO TOOLS, INC. ---9101129 Background Investigations 121010 17999 $229.12 --------------------Tot a I for Check 407884: $266.37 _7_8_6_14_3_8_7 ______ Ja.:.n_,t_o_ria_1_s_u.:.p.:.pl_ie_s ___________ 5_0_1_05_o __ 47200 $2,858.44 78616747 Janitorial Supplies 501050 47200 $264.92 ------78623885 Sanitary Supplies 415010 47200 $274.28 78624520 Sanrtary Supplies 415010 47200 $1,000.28 78621482 Sanitary Supplies 415010 47200 $1,044.10 $5,538.02 153024 153022 153023 152964 69353 71337 71494 71522 1403068 1404187 2001.200-02.19A INV6699782 ------------------Tot a I for Check 407885: Tree Trimming, Removal and Rep 402060 41200 $3,357.90 Tree Trimming, Removal and Rep 421040 41200 $12,689.28 Tree Trimming, Removal and Rep 423040 41200 $13,812.81 Tree Trimming, Removal and Rep 421040 41200 $586.31 -----------Fuel Kit Edger parts Chain Saw supplies String lrimmer repl3cement parts Rental of Poly Tanks, Lake Compressor Repairs Rental of Poly Tanks, Lake Compressor Repairs lnslrucl.or Payment Fall 2019 Sea-Tainer Shelves 501050 414040 414040 411040 402060 402060 208020 403570 Total for Check 407886: $30,446.30 47600 43080 43080 47600 Total for Check 407887: 43080 43080 Total for Check 407855: 41300 43080 $19.38 S83.68 S132.23 S3.61 $238.90 $4,874.99 $1,319.71 S6,194.70 S1,424.00 S1,078.33 Director of Finance Approved: ___ k'---'===-----------Register Total: $3,656,459.02 Date: ____ A_f/<-'-y'-'-/11.L,_ _______ _ 1 of 6 November 19, 2019, Item #1.3 City of Poway COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: November 19, 2019 TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Faviola Medina, City Clerk M (858) 668-4535 or fmedina@poway.org SUBJECT: Approva l of Minutes Summary: The City Council Meeting M inutes submitted hereto for approval are: • October 15, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes The Poway City Council sits as the Poway Planning Commission, the Poway Housing Authority, the Public Financing Authority, and the Successor Agency to the Poway Redevelopment Agency. Recommended Action: It is recommended that t he City Council approve t he Minutes as submitted. Public Notification: None. Attachments: A. October 15, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Reviewed/Approved By: WendKaserman Assista nt City Manager Reviewed By: Alan Fenstermacher City Attorney Approved By: Cit y Manager 2 of 6 November 19, 2019, Item #1.3 NOTE: These draft meeting minutes are not official until approved by the City Council at the next scheduled meeting. CITY OF POWAY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES October 15, 2019 City Council Chambers 13325 Civic Center Drive, Poway, California (Per Government Code 54953) (Meeting Called to Order as City CounciVCity of Poway Planning Commission/Poway Housing Authority/Public Financing Authority and Successor Agency to the Poway Redevelopment Agency) CALL TO ORDER Mayor Vaus called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m . ROLL CALL John Mullin , Barry Leonard , Caylin Frank , Dave Grosch , Steve Vaus STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT City Manager Chris Hazeltine; Assistant City Manager Wendy Kaserman; City Attorney Alan Fenstermacher; City Clerk Faviola Medina; Community Services D irector Brenda Sylvia ; Development Services Director Bob Manis; Finance Director Aaron Beanan; Human Resources/Risk Management Director Jodene Dunphy ; Interim Director of Publi c Works Eric Heidemann; Fire Chief Jon Canavan ; Captain Jeff Duckworth, Sheriff's Department. (Note: Hereinafter the titles Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Councilmember, City Manager, Assistant City Manager, City Attorney, City Clerk and Director of Finance shall be used to indicate Mayor/Chair, Deputy MayorNice Chair, Councilmember/Director, City Manager/Executive Director, Assistant City Manager/Assistant Executive Director, City Attorney/Counsel, City Clerk/Secretary and Director of Finance/Finance Officer.) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Deputy Mayor Grosch led the Pledge of Allegiance. MOMENT OF SILENCE Mayor Vaus led a moment of silence. PRESENTATION Mayor Vaus presented Deputy James Budd with a plaque in recognition of being selected as Poway Sheriff's Station Deputy of the Quarter. Councilmember Frank presented proclamations to PUSD Board Member T.J. Zane, PUSD Director Barbara Scholl , and Prevention Specialist Cindy Hicks representing Poway Unified School District, in recognition of October 2019 "Red Ribbon Week" and "Character Counts". Attachment A 3 of 6 November 19, 2019, Item #1.3 City of Poway-Minutes -October 15, 2019 PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Ed Franklin representing the Poway Chamber of Commerce gave a brief chamber state of the union address and spoke regarding upcoming events. Pete Neild expressed concerns regarding Vantage Point. Yuri Bohlen requested that Councilmember Frank should recuse herself from City business involving water. Chris Olps invited Council to attend the grand opening of Win Joe St. Lucas suggested that staff PowerPoint presentati made available to the public prior to City Council meetings. 1.CONSENTCALENDAR Motioned by Deputy Mayor Grosch, se Consent Calendar Items 1.1 through 1.5. Ayes: Noes: Absent: Mullin Non Non 1.1 Approval of Readin · 1.2 1.3 Approval 1.4 /~ s ' r Mullin to approve g roll-call vote: ' -ull of Ordinances on Agenda -2, 2019 through September cture Engineering Corporation for Design ell Distribution Flow Meter Project; RFP No. ., 1.5 Award -~IJiontract to L. Lake Por9Jathways P , aving ealing, Inc., for the FY 18/19 ADA Barrier Removal; ' 2. ORDINANCE '/ /, None. ~ ~ ct; Bid t<Jo. 20-003 3. PUBLIC HEARING None. 4. STAFF REPORT 4.1 Award of Contract to EC Constructors, Inc. for the Mickey Cafagna Community Center Project; Bid No. 20-004 4 of 6 November 19, 2019, Item #1.3 City of Poway-Minutes -October 15, 2019 City Engineer Tom Frank presented the report along with a slideshow presentation. Mr. Frank stated that the project will demolish and construct a new community center that will create a shared-use, multi-generational facility to serve the entire community along with flexible spaces to accommodate various types of programming. Mr. Frank discussed the Hybrid and the Hybrid Plus floorplans and stated that the project's remaining budget is $11,867,596 which is sufficient to fund either of the two options. He further added that the City received eight bids and is recommending that contract be awarded to the lowest bidder, EC Constructors, Inc. Additionally, Mr. Frank explained that the total project cost including furniture, equipment, related fees and a 10 percent contingency for the Hybrid floorplan is $10,356,155 and $11,768, 515 for the Hybrid Plus floorplan. He stated that construction is scheduled to begin November 2019 with an anticipated mpletion date in May 2021 and that senior center activities have been temporarily rel to leased space at a church located off Pomerado Road. He explained that st evise the construction contract based on the floor plan selected. Cynthia Elizondo, President of the Board Corporation, spoke in support of the Hybri Chris Olps expressed concerns with the Yuri Bohlen questioned wha event of a disaster while the The following speakers filled o did not wish to speak: Mary Ca ay, Papineau. During discus floorplan and t work, dedication ' .. ~ Counefjii! . xpresse ·, d staff the Mi · ~~fforts t,,"' went int .,. %, ay Valley Senior Citizens -resident r shelter in the ruction. Ir of the Hybrid Plus f/oorplan but t. Lucas, Pat Schultz and Liz -2,587 square-foot Hybrid Plus oc Committee for all their hard /,~ uncil stru ba "d amount o ~ 59, "'~ by Councilmember Frank to award the ey Cafagna Community Center Project; plus ad ~ e alternate 1 (Hybrid Plus floorplan), for a !Motion carried unanimously. ' 5. WORKSHO ' ' ~. 5.1 Water and vltJ,awater R ~Study and Public Workshop . . o/,%,, Finance Director ~~· nan presented the report along with a slideshow presentation discussing the eval~ of the City's current water and wastewater rates, and the nine water rate structures and four wastewater rate structures presented for Council consideration. In addition, Mr. Beanan stated that staff is proposing a two-year rate setting process. He further added that the formal Comprehensive Cost of Study (COSS) report outlining the methodology, cost of service, financial plan and rate design will be prepared by Raftelis Consultants once water and wastewater rate structures have been narrowed down by Council. Mr. Beanan concluded that a second workshop further discussing the options for water and sewer rate structures is scheduled for November 19, 2019. Additionally, setting the public hearing date for the chosen structures, as a result of the two workshops, will be held on January 7, 2020. 5 of 6 November 19, 2019, Item #1.3 6. MAY City of Poway -Minutes -October 15, 2019 Peter De Hoff spoke in favor of the current water rate structure and encouraged Council to consider the most equitable option with the smallest overall cost differences to as many residents. Elaine Gillum spoke against all of the options presented and suggested that sewer rates be based on the previous year's winter-spring usage. Mike Fry expressed concerns with the options presented and recommended installation of second water meters in homes to monitor outdoor water use. Chris Olps spoke regarding past water conservation effo . . during a drought. Council discussion ensued re staff to focus on Option 2b an rate structures also indicate months woul online tool t impact their tructure options. Council directed nd narrowed down wastewater tion for wastewater. Council en s was too high and felt four uested staff to follow-up with an . ~ ding how e narrowed down options would ' • .,,, & t· I ·t N t· t k "'~,'-as an~11orma 1ona I em. o ac 10n was a en. "' w ~. JED ITEM.S7#' The Ma nc ~~jnts and reported on various events taking place in the •• City. No ta COUNCILMEMBA/, ; REPORTS -Pursuant to AB1234-G.C. §53232.3(d) Councilmember Mui pdate on the recent meeting of the Metro Wastewater Commission and repo . , atus of the Pure Water San Diego Program. Councilmember Frank gave an update on the recent Metropolitan Transit System Board meeting and reported on the MTS Elevate SD 2020 sales tax measure. 7. CITY MANAGER ITEMS None. 6 of 6 November 19, 2019, Item #1.3 City of Poway-Minutes -October 15, 2019 8. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS 8.1 Conference with Legal Counsel -Anticipated Litigation Government Code§ 54956.9(d)(2) -one (1) case 8.2 Conference with Real Property Negotiator (Gov. Code 54956.8) Property: APN 278-450-2700 City Negotiator: City Manager Chris Hazeltine Persons with whom the City Negotiator May Negotiate: Best Best & Krieger; Ron Little Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment At the request of City Attorney Alan Fenstermacher, Mayor/ , us adjourned the meeting into Closed Session at 9:56 p.m. · d City Attorney Fenstermacher City Manager to enter into . cad Safety Improvements ' ,, .ft • November 19, 2019, Item #1.4 DATE: TO: FROM: CONTACT: SUBJECT: Summary: City of Poway COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT November 19, 2019 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Aaron Beanan , Director of Finance ~ Aaron Beanan, Director of Finance (858) 668-4411 or abeanan@poway.org City's Investment Report as of September 30 , 2019 Quarterly reports of investments are required to be presented to the City Council per state code and the C ity's Investment Policy. For your information, attached is an investment portfolio report as of September 30, 2019. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council accept and file the attached report. Discussion: Pursuant to Government Code Sec. 53646(b) and the City's Investment Po licy, the Finance Director (i.e., Treasurer) renders a quarterly investment report to the City Council concerning the investment portfolio 's earnings and performance results . In accordance with the Investment Policy , the quarterly report includes information such as the investment type , issuer, date of maturity, par value , amount invested, current market va lue, and the source of the market value information. The City is in compliance with its adopted investment policy , and the City's investment program provides sufficient liquidity to meet its cash flow requirements fo r the next six months. The fair value of the City's investment portfolio as of September 30 , 2019 , was $114,117,021 . It consisted of the following : Investment Portfolio Total Deoosits at CalTRUST $22,571 ,198 Deposits at the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 8,602,474 U. S . Treasury Notes 15,015,768 U. S. Instrumentalit ies 44,304,426 Corporate Notes 23 ,623,155 Fair Value of Investment Portfolio as of June 30 , 2019 $114 ,117,021 The attached portfolio report (attachment B) and investment report (attachment C) were prepared by the City's investment manager, Insig ht Investment, with input from the City 's Finance Depart ment. The portfolio report includes all investments while the investment report includes only those investments managed by Insight Investment. 1 of 31 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4 All City funds, including the General Fund, Water Fund, Wastewater Fund and others -except those identified in Attachment D, are pooled and invested, with earned interest allocated quarterly based on the average daily cash balance in each fund. The funds on deposit at LAIF and CalTRUST earn interest at variable rates. The interest rate for the month ending September 30, 2019, is estimated at 2.28% for LAIF, 2.20% for the CalTRUST short-term fund, and 2.13% for the CalTRUST medium-term fund. The values of fixed income securities, as legal investment tools authorized under California government codes, are closely tied with interest rates. As interest rates go up, the market values of the securities go down, and vice versa. This is known as interest rate risk or market risk. A portfolio's duration is a common measurement of interest rate risk. Due to anticipated actions of the Federal Reserve, the Finance Department, in conjunction with Insight Investment, has been increasing the duration of the externally managed investment portfolio over the last few months by investing in longer-term investments (e.g. treasuries and corporate notes). This strategy will help preserve the city's interest earning ability in an environment of declining interest rates as well as help increase market value. While not totally within the scope of this report's time period, the Federal Reserve decided to lower the target federal funds rate by 25 basis points three times since June: July 31st, September 18th , and October 30 th • For fixed income securities, the difference between amortized cost and fair value is considered an unrealized gain or loss. A realized loss is when the principal of the security is redeemed before its maturity date at a fair value lower than its amortized cost value. The amortized cost value of the externally managed investment portfolio is $82,564,038; the fair value is $82,943,349 for an unrealized gain of $379,311 or .46% of the total amortized cost value. The source of the fair value information for the U.S. Treasury Notes, the U.S. Instrumentalities, Corporate Notes, and Municipal Bonds is Interactive Data Corporation. Also included with this report are recaps of the City's cash and investments held by fiscal agents, non-managed investments, and cash on hand. The total book value of the cash and investments held by our fiscal agent, U.S. Bank, at September 30, 2019, was $474,172. The source of the market value information for these investments was U.S. Bank. The total book value of the non- managed investments was $106,516 at September 30, 2019. The City's cash on hand at September 30, 2019, totaled $596,943. The September 30, 2019 balance of the City's Library Trust Fund was $258,071. Through the Fiscal Year 2019-20 period ending September 30, 2019, no transfer of interest earnings has been made to the General Fund. At the close of Fiscal Year 2018-19, 90% of the Library Trust Fund's interest earnings, or $4,954, was transferred to the General Fund to partially offset library operating expenses. Environmental Review: This action is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Fiscal Impact: The externally managed investment portfolio earned $140,948 of interest during September 2019 as well as $142,761 during August 2019 and $128,920 during July 2019. Public Notification: None. 2 of 31 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4 Attachm e nts: A. Investment Statistics B. Investment Portfolio Report prepared by Insight Investment C. Investment Report Prepared by Insight Investment D. City of Poway Investments and Cash with Fiscal Agent ; General , Payroll , and Petty Cash Report at September 30, 2019 Attachments: Reviewed/Approved By : Wendy serman Assistant City Manager 3 of 31 Reviewed By: Alan Fenstermacher City Attorney Approved By : Ch°t!!i£2 C ity Manager November 19, 2019, Item #1.4 City of Poway Investment Statistics Separately Managed Investment Pools Fair Value: CalTRUST Short-Term Deposits CalTRUST Medium-Term Deposits Deposits at the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Total Fair Value Weighted Average Yield Effective Average Duration in days Weighted Average Maturity in days Externally Managed Investment Pools Fair Value: U. S. Treasury Notes U. S. Instrumentalities Corporate Bonds Municipal Bonds Total Fair Value Amortized Cost Value: U. S. Treasury Notes U. S. Instrumentalities Corporate Bonds Municipal Bonds Total Amortized Cost Value Unrealized Gain (Loss) Accrued Interest Earned Weighted Average Yield Effective Average Duration in years Weighted Average Maturity in years Total Fair Value of Portfolio Assets Weighted Average Yield Effective Average Duration in years Weighted Average Maturity in years Glossary of Yield Terminology September 2018 10,894,784 10,883,166 12,357,464 34,135,414 2.13% 1 1 13,875,516 36,470,876 21,341,784 1,233,456 72,921,632 13,971,119 36,847,479 21,569,366 1,235,000 73,622,964 (701,332) 102,191 1.76% 1.05 1.06 107,057,046 1.88% 0.72 0.72 June 2019 11,136,533 11,293,865 29,261,212 51,691,610 2.49% 1 11,035,860 40,004,279 21,426,732 0 72,466,871 10,999,625 39,893,064 21,421,640 0 72,314,329 152,542 116,235 2.01% 1.00 1.05 124,158,481 2.21% 0.58 0.61 Coupon: A bond's coupon is the periodic interest payment made to the holder of the fixed income security during the life of the bond. Coupon payments can be made monthly, quarterly, or annually. Book Yield: The Book Yield is that rate of return that will make the present value of the future cash flows of a fixed income security equal to the price paid for the security. This assumes that the security will be held to its maturity. Current Yield: Annual rate of return on an investment expressed as a percentage. Current Yield of a fixed income security is the annualized earnings (coupon) divided by the bond's market value as of the valuation date. One Year Total Yield: The One Year Total Yield or One Year Return represents the portfolio's percentage change over a year's time, factoring in interest payments, changes in market value and reinvestment of distributions. September 2019 11,203,088 11,368,110 8,602,474 31,173,672 2.20% 1 1 15,015,768 44,304,426 23,623,155 0 82,943,349 14,927,719 44,084,166 23,552,153 0 82,564,038 379,311 140,948 2.01% 1.91 2.02 114,117,021 2.06% 1.39 1.47 Weighted Average Yield: The total yield on a bond portfolio divided by the number of bonds contained in it, weighted for the size of each bond so that the yield of large holdings does not drown out the calculation of yields on small holdings. Yield to Maturity: The Yield to Maturity (YTM) or Market Yield to Maturity of a fixed income security is that rate of interest that will make the present value of the future cash flows equal to the market value as of the valuation date, assuming the bond is held to maturity. 4 of 31 ATTACHMENT A November 19, 2019, Item #1.4 City of Poway Monthly Investment Portfolio Report September 30, 2019 Seperately Managed Investment Pools % Return LAIF $ 8,602,474 28% 2.28% Ca lTrust -Short $ 11,203,088 36% 2.20% CalTrust -Medium $ 11,368,110 36% 2.13% Total Internally Managed $ 31,173,672 27% Weighted Average Yield 2.20% Days Effective Average Duration -Internal 1 Weighted Average Maturity• Internal 1 Externally Managed Assets % Return Treasury Securities $ lS,0lS,768 18% 1.92% Instrumentalit y Securit ies $ 44,304,426 S3% 1.99% Corporate Notes $ 23,623,lSS 28% 2.09% Total Externally Managed $ 82,943,349 73% Weighted Average Yield 2 .01% Yea r s Effective Average Duration -External 1.91 Weighted Average Fina l Maturity -External 2.02 Total Portfolio Assets % Return LAIF $ CalTrust -Short $ CalTrust -Medium $ Treasury Securities $ Instrumentality Securities $ Corporate Notes $ Tota l Portfolio Assets $ Weighted Average Yie ld Effective Average Duration -Total Weighted Average Maturity -To tal Portfolio Change Beginn ing Balance Ending Balanc e Assets values shown at Market 8,602,474 8% 2.28% 11,203,088 10% 2.20% 11,368,110 10% 2.13% 15,015,768 13% 1.92% 44,304,426 39% 1 .99% 23,623,155 21% 2.09% 114,117,021 2.06% Years 1.39 1.47 $ $ CalTrust - Medium, 36% Corporate Corporate Notes 22% Instrumentality Securities 42% 115,352,745 114,117,021 5 of 31 ATTACHMENT B LAIF, 28% Treas ury Securities, 18% Securities, 53% CalTrust -Short CalTrust - 11% Medium 11% Treasury Securities 14% November 19, 2019, Item #1.4► ~ 0 :I: :s: m z -i 0 -. -I • LLON [ IN\'ESTMENiMANAGEMEIH November 19, 2019, Item #1.4..... Contents 0 -w .... Fixed income market review 3 Activity and performance summary 4 Recap of securities held 6 Maturity distribution of securities held 7 Securities held 8 GASB 40 Deposit and investment risk disclosure 15 Securities purchased 20 Securities sold and matured 21 Transaction report 22 Additional information 24 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4FIXED INCOME MARKET REVIEW As of September 30, 2019 00 0 -w .... Chart 1: ISM Manufacturing & Non-Manufacturing Indices 9/30/2014-9/30/2019 71) 60 JO S.:p-14 Scp-15 SCJ>-16 --)llanufacturing --Non-:-.1anufac1unng Source: Bloomberg Finance LP, September 30, 2019. Chart 2: Treasury yield curve: 9130/2018 and 9130/2019 3.5()% 2.50'11 2.0(J'A l.50'll. 1.00% 0.50~ Scp-l'J J m 6 m I yr 2 yr J yr 4 yr 5 yr 6 yr 7 yr X yr 9 yr IO yr --':1/:ll.lf.?Ol':1 --9130/'.?.0J~ Source: Bloomberg Finance LP, September 30, 2019. :1TY OF POWAY Economic Indicators and Monetarv Policy The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing and Non-Manufacturing Indices diverged in August. The Non-Manufacturing Index increased to a three-month high of 56.4 from 53. 7 in July with broad-based improvement and the business activity subcomponent surged to 61.5 from the July reading of 53.1. Meanwhile, the Manufacturing Index fell in August to 49.1 which was below market expectations and the lowest reading since 2016. The new orders subcomponent fell to more than a 7-year low of 47.2 and the production measure fell to 49.5, the weakest since 2015. For the ISM Indices, readings below 50 indtcate a contracting environment. (See Chart 1.) The employment reporc showed that 130,000 jobs were added in August, below the forecast for 160,000 new jobs, and July growth was revised to 159,000 jobs added from 164,000 originally reported. The unemployment rate was unchanged at 3.7% for the last three months, just off the historic low of 3.6% witnessed in April and May. The underemployment rate, which Is the broadest measure of unemployment and includes marginally attached workers, increased to 7.2% m August from 7% 1n July. Average hourly earnings increased 0.4% in August for annual growth of 3.2%. Average hourly earnings have been at least 3% since August 2018. On September 18, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) easeo monetary policy further by lowering the fed funds target rate by 25bp to a range of 1.75%-2%. However, its summary of Economic ProJectJons presented the cut in a somewhat hawkish light. While seven participants argued tor another rate cut before the end of the year, five indicated that the September cut was not warranted. The next meeting of the FOMC is on October 30. Interest Rate Summary Ac the end of September, the 3-month US Treasury bill yielded 1.82%, the 6-month US Treasury bill yielded 1.82%, the 2-year US Treasury note yielded 1.62%, the 5-year US Treasury note yielded 1.55% and the 10-year US Treasury note yielded 1.67%. (See Chart 21. 3 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4ACTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE SUMMARY For the period September 1, 2019 -September 30, 2019 co 0 ~---------------------------------~ .... w .... Amortized Cost Basis Activity Summary Opening balance Income received Total receipts Total disbursements lnterportiolio transfers Total lnterportfolio transfers Realized gain (lossl Total amortization expense Total 01D/MICT accretion income Return of capital Closing balance Ending fair value Unrealized gain (loss) 165,892.84 (22,321.21) Comparative Rates of Return 1%1 • Twelve * Six month trailing month trailing Fed Funds Overnight Repo Merrill Lynch 3m US Treas Bill Merrill Lynch 6m US Treas 8111 ML 1 Year US Treasury Note ML 2 Year US Treasury Note ML 5 Year US Treasury Note .. rates reflected are cumulative 2.31 2.40 2.23 2.25 2.33 2.28 2.28 1.15 1.18 1.06 1.03 1.03 0.96 0.94 82,427,731.47 165,892.84 0.00 122,321 21) 1,065.45 (18,347.95) 10,017.54 0.00 82,564,038.14 82,943,349.37 379,311.23 *One month 0.17 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.13 Detail of Amortized Cost Basis Return Interest Accretion Realized earned {amortization) gain Uoss) Corporate Bonds 44,732.29 14.700.55) 1,065.45 Government Agencies 73,176.54 13,580.57) 0.00 Government Bonds 23,039.20 149.29) 0.00 Total 140,948.03 (8,330.41) 1,065.45 Summary of Amortized Cost Basis Return for the Period Interest earned Accretion (amortization) Realized gain (loss) on sales Total income on portfolio Average daily amortized cost Period return(%) YTD return (%) Weighted average final maturity m days CITY OF POWAY Total income 41,097.19 69,595.97 22,989.91 133,683.07 Total portfolio 140,948.03 (8,330.41) 1,065.45 133,683.07 82,028,575.84 0.16 1.47 736 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4ACTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE SUMMARY For the period September 1, 2019 -September 30, 2019 .... 0,----------------------------------, 0 -c., .... Fair Value Basis Activity Summary Opening baJance Income received Total receipts Total disbursements lnterportfolio transfers Total lnterportfollo transfers Unrealized gain (lossl on security movements Return of capital Change in fair value for the period Ending fair value 165,892.84 (22,321..21) Comparative Rates of Return {%} * Twelve *Six month trailing month trailing Fed Funds 2.31 1.15 Overnight Repo 2.40 1.18 ICE BofAML 3 Months UST-BILL 2.39 1.20 ICE ML 6m US Treas B111 2.64 1.36 ICE ML 1 Year US Treasury Note 3.13 1.50 ICE Ml US Treasury 1-3 4.36 2.02 ICE ML US Treasury 1-5 5.62 2.59 * rates reflected are cumulative 82,986,643.34 165,892.84 0.00 (22,321.21) 0.00 0.00 (186,865.60) 82,943,349.37 * One month 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.11 (0.11) (0.24) Detail of Fair Value Basis Return Interest Change in earned fair value Corporate Bonds 44,732.29 (32,455.37) Government Agencies 73,176.54 (114,759.21) Government Bonds 23,039.20 (39,651.02) Total 140,948.03 (186,865.60) Summary of Fair Value Basis Return for the Period Interest earned Change in fair value Total income on portfolio Average daily total value~ Period rewrn {%) YTD return (%) We,ghte<l average final marurity tn days * Total value equals market value and ac<:rued interest CITY OF POWAY Total income 12,276.92 (41,582 67) (16,611.82} (45,917.57) Total portfolio 140,94803 (186,865.60) (45,917.57) 82,836,900.75 (0.05) 2.63 736 5 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4RECAP OF SECURITIES HELD As of September 30, 2019 ..... ..... a w .... Corporate Bonds Government Agencies Government Bonds Historical cost 23,631,882.00 44,022,870.06 14,918,905.72 Amortized cost 23,552,152.75 44,084, 166.64 14,927,718.75 Fair value 23,623,154.79 44,304,426.46 15,015,768.12 .. Unrealized gain Ooss) 71,002.04 220,259.82 88,049.37 Weighted average final maturity (days) 683 695 941 Portfolio diversification (%) ■ Corporate Bonds ■ Government Agencies ■ Government Bonds Total Percent of portfolio 28.62 53.31 18.07 28.62 53.31 18.07 100.00 Weighted average effective duration (years) 1.73 1.82 2.47 CITY OF POWAY 6 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4MATURilTY DISTRIBUTION OF SECURilTIES HELD As of September 30, 2019 .... N s. (.,) .... Maturity Under 90 days 90 to 179 days 180 days to 1 year 1 to2years 2 to 3 years 3 to 4 years 4 to 5 years Over 5 years E ..s .., .,. 0 u 20.00 o'I>~ 0.1~ c-'8' -v<;;< Maturity distribution o'I>~ ~ ~{:, ~<:, ~0.1 ...__--\e; '\,~ 4-<li ,o ";, " ,o 'i'o cy>,o <:, o'I>~ ..... 't,~ " CITY OF POWAY Historic cost Percent 7,972,438.75 9.66 11,528,637.44 13.96 12,893,616.75 15.62 11,978,396.00 14.51 8,012,685.17 9.70 18, 178,296.35 22.02 12,009,587.32 14.54 0.00 0.00 82,573,657.78 100.00 ~<:, ~<:, ~~ 4-<b 4-<b 4-0 t,,. ~ /.,_~ -s> ,o ,Jo ~ t,. 0 7 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4SECURITIES HELD CITY OF POWAY As of September 30, 2019 .... w o Cusip/ Coupon Maturity/ Par value or Historical cost/ Amortized cost/ Fair value/ Unrealized Interest Interest Total % -.. CaJI date shares Accrued interest Accretion Change in fair gain received earned accrued Port wDescnpt1on .... purchased (amortization) value (loss) interest cost Corporate Bonds 48127HAA7 2.200 10122/2019 1,000,000.00 990,780.00 W9,578.30 1,000,015-33 437,03 0.00 1,772.23 9,655.56 1.20 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.2% 0.00 575.06 158.88 220CT2019 02665WBZ3 2.000 11113/2019 1,000,000.00 993,010.00 999,504.01 W9,990.00 485.99 0.00 1,611.11 7,611.11 1.20 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 0.00 346.04 210.00 2% 13NOV2019 14912L6F3 2.250 1210112019 1.000,000.00 1,011,910.00 1,000,880.62 1,000, 165.89 (714.73) 0.00 1,312.50 7,437.50 1.23 CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE 0.00 {433.09) (15.26) 225% 01DEC2019 717081EB5 1.700 12/15/2019 1,000,000.00 999,940.00 999,995.23 999,182.40 (812.83) 0.00 1,369.44 4,958.33 1.21 PFIZER INC 1.n: 150EC2019 0.00 1.90 542.95 17275RAH5 4.450 01115/2020 1,000,000.00 1,070,170.00 1,007,564.53 1 ,006,595.06 {969.471 0.00 3,584-72 9,270.83 1.30 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.45% 0.00 15JAN2020 (2,161.29) (1,870.67} 594918AYO I .850 02112/2020 1,500,000.00 1,506,140.00 1,500,658.61 1,498,745.97 (1,912.64) 0.00 2,235.42 3,700.00 1.82 MICROSOFT CORP 1.85% 0111212020 0.00 (193.72) (582.53) 12FE82020(CAllABLE 12JAN20) 25468PDP8 l.950 03/04/2020 1,500,000.00 1,504,635.00 1,500,703.24 1,499,301.29 (1,401.95) 14,625.00 2,356.25 2,112.50 1.82 TWDC ENTERPRISES 18 CORP 0.00 1. 95% 04MAR2020 (137.00) {770.25) 713448CS5 l .850 04130/2020 1,500,000.00 1,499,655.00 1,499,932.35 1,498,811..57 (1,120.78) 0.00 2,312.50 11,562.50 1.82 PEPSICO INC 1.85% 03/30/2020 0.00 9.66 672.24 30APR2020(CALLA8LE 30MAR20) 69353RES3 2.600 07/21/2020 1,000,000.00 1,016,010.00 1,004,276.98 1,003,914.08 (362.90) 0.00 2,094.44 4,983-33 1.23 PNC BANK NA 2.6% 21JUL2020 06/21/2020 (CALLABLE 21JUN::>O) 0.00 1491.61) 1486.79) 053015AD5 2.250 09/15/2020 l ,000,000.00 1,002,630.00 1,000,840.21 1,002,763.21 1,923.00 11,250.00 1,812.50 937.50 1.21 AUTOMATIC DATA 08/1512020 PROCESSNG 2.25% 155Ef>2020 0.00 (80.02) (102.98) (CALLABlE 15AUG20) a November 19, 2019, Item #1.4SECURITIES HELD CITY OF POWAY As of September 30, 2019 ..... ~ o Cusip/ Coupon Maturity/ Par value or Historical cosU Amortized cosu Fair value/ Unrealized Interest Interest Total % ;:oescription Call date shares Accrued interest Accretion Change in fair gain received earned accrued Port ..... purchased (amortization) value (loss) interest cost Corporate Bonds 19l216BT6 1.875 10/27/2020 2,000,000.00 1,987,240.00 1,995,224.26 2,000,902.16 5,677.90 0.00 3,020.83 15,937.50 2.41 COCA-COLA CO/THE 1.875% 0.00 370.22 1,463.40 270CT2020 89233P7F7 2.625 01/10/2023 2,000,000.00 2,001,380.00 2,001,238.33 2,045,092.66 43,854.33 0.00 4,229.17 11,666.67 2.42 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 0.00 (31.48) (2,952.42) 2.625% 10JAN2023 084670BR8 2.750 03/15/2023 1 ,000,000.00 1,021,370.00 1,020,145.94 1,025,129.98 4,984.04 13,750.00 2,215.27 1,145.83 1.24 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 01/15/2023 0.00 1510.03) (6,742.99) 2.75% 15MAR2023 {CALLABLE 15JAN23) 931142DH3 2.550 04/11/2023 1,000,000.00 l ,015,270.00 1,014,392.55 1,020,335.41 5,942.86 0.00 2,054.16 11,970.83 1.23 WALMART INC 2.55% 01/1112023 11 APR2023 {CALLABLE 0.00 (365.61) 14,731.98) 11JAN23) 037833AK6 2.400 05/03/2023 1,000,000.00 1,007,920.00 1,007,557.61 1,016,469.15 8,911.54 0.00 1,933.33 9,800.00 1.22 APPLE INC 2.4% 03MAY2023 0.00 (175.35) (4,595.21) 69353RFL7 3 .500 06,'08/2023 1,900,000.00 1,995,436.00 1,992,068.53 1,994,928.31 2.859.78 0.00 5,356.95 20,688.89 2.42 PNC BANK NA 3.5% 08JUN2023 05109/2023 (CALLABLE 09MA Y23) 0.00 (2,126.29) (9,172.14) 68389XSL8 2 .400 09115/2023 1,000,000.00 1.008,750.00 1,008,214.41 1,012,351.81 4,137.40 12,000.00 1,933.33 1,000.00 1.22 ORACLE CORP 2 .4% 07115/2023 0.00 1180.53) (2,593.86) 15SEP20231CALLABlE 15JUL23) 91159HHV5 3.37 5 02/05/2024 1,900,000.00 1,999,636.00 1,999,377.04 1,998,460.51 1916.53) 0.00 0.01 9,796.88 2.42 US BANCORP 3.375% 01105/2024 05FEB2024(CALLABLE (9,796.87) 1258.96) (1,175.49) 05JAN24) Total Corporate Bonds. 23,300,000.00 23,631,882.00 23,552,152.75 23,623,154.79 71,002.04 51,625.00 41,704.16 144,235.76 28.62 (9,796.87} {5,842.101 (32,745.10) 9 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4SECURITIES HELD CITY OF POWAY As of September 30, 2019 .... C1'I o Cusip/ Coupon Maturity/ Par value or Historical cosu Amortized cost/ Fair value/ Unrealized Interest Interest Total % z;oescription Call date shares Accrued interest Accretion Change in fair gain received earned accrued Port .... purchased (amortization I value (loss) interest cost Government Agencies 313AG3N30 1.500 10/0312019 1,000,000.00 993,500.00 999,969.81 999,957.54 (12.27) 0.00 1,208.33 7,375.00 120 FREDDIE MAC 1 .5% 0.00 301.85 545.56 030CT2019 CALLABLE 3135GOR39 1.000 10/24/2019 1,000,000.00 983,180.00 999,573.28 999,397.79 (175.49) 0.00 805.55 4,333.33 1.19 FANNIE MAE 1% 240CT20l9 0.00 533.41 867.62 3130AA2HO 1.125 11/29/2019 1,000,000.00 997,150.00 999,847.14 998,816.85 (1,030.29) 0.00 906.25 3,781.25 1.21 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.00 77.73 1,057.67 1,125%29NOV2019 3136G4DA8 1 . 200 1 2/30/2019 1,000,000.00 998,250.00 999,864.11 998,342.29 (1,521.82) 0.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 1.21 FANNIE MAE 1.2%300EC2019 0.00 45.30 580.81 CALLABLE II0001 3133EGLA1 1.1 70 0111 312020 2,000,000.00 1,999,780.00 1,999,981.09 1,996,293.64 {3,687.45) 0.00 1,885.00 5,005.00 2.42 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0.00 5.51 2,386.04 1. 17% 13JAN2020 (CALLABLE 110CT19) 3137EAEES 1.500 0111712020 3,000,000.00 2,957,514.00 2,989.696.44 2,996,334.00 6,637-56 0.00 3,625.00 9,125.00 3.58 FREDDIE MAC 1.5% 17JAN2020 0.00 2,888.85 1,317.63 3130AECJ7 2.625 05/28/2020 1,500,000.00 1,497,100.50 1,498,879.74 1,507,300.70 8,420.96 0.00 3,171.87 13,343.75 1.81 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.00 141.21 (912.64) 2.625% 28MAY2020 3130ABY34 1 .613 05/29/2020 2,000,000.00 1,994,820.00 1,998,678.74 1,997,050.08 (1,628.66) 0.00 2,598.72 10.842.94 2.42 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.00 165.85 255.04 1 .613% 29MA Y2020 3136G4KD4 1.750 06/29/2020 1,900,000.00 1,899,525.00 1,899,895.61 1,895,540.47 (4,355.14) 0.00 2,678.47 8,404.86 2.30 FANNIE MAE l.75% 29JUN2020 12129/2019 0.00 11.64 {4,523.22) (CALLABLE 29DEC19) 3133EHYM9 1.500 09/14/2020 ,.000.000.00 1,993,720.00 1,997,990.40 1,994,295.78 (3,694.62) 15,000.00 2.416.66 1,333.33 2.41 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0.00 175.26 tl,124.54) 1.5% 14SEP2020 10 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4SECURITIES HELD CITY OF POWAY As of September 30, 2019 .... a, Fair value/ Unrealized Total o Cusipl Coupon Maturity/ Par value or Historical cost/ Amortized cost/ Interest Interest % ;:'.;Description Call date shares Accrued interest Accretion Change in fair gain received earned accrued Port .... purchased (amortization) value (loss) interest cost Government Agencies 3130AEWA4 2.625 10/01/2020 2,000,000.00 1,990,580.00 1,995,085.81 2,015,499.82 20,414.01 0.00 4,229.17 26,104.17 2.41 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.00 421.99 {4,425.68) 2.625% 010CT2020 3133EGM51 1.650 12/01/2020 1,000,000.00 996,971.00 999,112.59 997,766.22 (1,34637) 0.00 1,329.17 5,454.17 1.21 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0.00 63.24 {2,282.84) 1.65% 01 DEC2020 3130A3UQ5 1.875 12/11/2020 1,000,000.00 997,820.00 999,141.94 1,000,418.53 1,276.59 0.00 1,510.41 5,677.08 1.21 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.00 59.73 (2,845.60) 1.875% 11 DEC2020 3133EKAJ5 2.500 02/1112021 1,000,000.00 999,265.00 999,497.37 1,009,061.93 9,564.56 0.00 2,013.89 3,402.78 1.21 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0.00 30.71 (3,319.39) 2.5% i 1 FEB2021 3133EJJD2 2.540 04/0512021 1,000,000.00 1,004,390.00 1,003,277.47 1,012,474.71 9,197.24 0.00 2,046.11 12,347.22 1.22 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0.00 2.54% OSAPR2021 (180.41) (1,782.13) 313379RB7 1.875 06/1112021 1,000,000.00 985,600.00 989,348.18 1,002,223.57 12,875.39 0.00 1,510.41 5,677.08 1 19 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.00 523.00 [2,941.59) 1.875% 11 JUN2021 3135GOU35 2.750 06/2212021 2,000.000.00 2,017,500.00 2,013,572.32 2,035,456.96 21,884.64 0.00 4,430.55 14,972.22 2.44 FANNIE MAE 2.75% 22JUN2021 0.00 (654.61) {7,665.66) 3133EKCBO 2.500 07/01/2021 1,000,000.00 999,030.00 999,275.66 1,012,337.65 13,061.99 0.00 2,013.89 6, 1so.so 1.21 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0.00 34.44 13,795.65) 2.5% 01 JUL2021 3130AABG2 1 .875 11/29/2021 1,000,000.00 990,090.00 992,000.11 1,004,071.00 12,070.89 0.00 1,510.41 6,302.08 l.20 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.00 308.08 (3,573.83) 1.875% 29NOV2021 3135GOU92 2.625 01111/2022 1,500,000.00 1,513,185.00 1,511,136.71 1,532,042.78 20.906.07 0.00 3,171.88 8,640.63 1.83 FANNIE MAE 2.625% 0.00 11JAN2022 1420.51) 16,050.67) 11 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4SECURITIES HELD CITY OF POWAY As of September 30, 2019 ..... ...., o Cusip/ Coupon Maturity/ Par value or Historical cosu Amortized cosU Fair value/ Unrealized Interest Interest Total % : Description Call date shares Accrued interest Accretion Change in fair gain received earned accrued Port .... purchased (amortization) value Uoss) interest cost Government Agencies 313378CRO 2.250 03111 /2022 2,000,000.00 2,004,000.00 2,003,492.57 2,028,635.82 25,143.25 22,500.00 3,625.00 2,375.00 2.43 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.00 n 1s.93J (8,360.34) 2.25% 11 MAR2022 31331K3A6 2. 710 12/1 312022 1,000,000.00 1,028,921.06 1,026,827.02 1,034,272.24 7,445.22 0.00 2,183.05 8,054.72 1.25 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0.00 1698.01) (6,177.34) 2.71% 13DEC2022 31331KAF7 4.090 01118/2023 1,850,000.00 2,008,452.50 2,004,043.84 1,994,546.77 (9,497.07) 0.00 6,095.24 15,133.00 2.43 fEOERAL FARM CREDIT SANK 0.00 (3,889.99) (11,410.061 4.09% 18JAN2023 3133EKKT2 2.250 02/0812023 1,000,000.00 1,017,480.00 1,016,131.28 1,020,717.92 4,586.64 0.00 1,812.50 3,250.00 1.23 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0.00 (400.61) (3,544.49) 2.25% 08FE82023 3137EAENS 2.7 SO 0611912023 2,000,000.00 2,067,740.00 2,064,283.39 2,080,856.60 16,573.21 0.00 4,430.56 15,430.56 2.50 FREDO IE MAC 2.75% 0.00 (1,440.25) 111,634.90) 19JUN2023 3135GOU43 2,875 09112/2023 1,000,000.00 1,039,050.00 1,036,970.11 1,047,994.30 11,024.19 14,375.00 2,315.97 1,437.50 1.26 FANNIE MAE 2.875% 0.00 (779.96) (7,330.87) 12SEP2023 3133EKVB9 1 .860 10/17/2023 2,000,000.00 1,997,646.00 1,997,756.85 2,019,924.88 22,168.03 0.00 2,996.66 7,543.33 2.42 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0.00 46,19 (14,801.10) 1 .86% 170CT2023 3130A3VCS 2 .250 12/08/2023 1 ,000,000.00 1,014.600.00 1,014,023.44 1,023,689.53 9,666.09 0.00 1,812..50 7,000.00 1.23 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.00 (278.98) 18,648.91) 2.25% 08DEC2023 3135GOV34 2.500 02/05/2024 1,000,000.00 1,028,090.00 1,026,953.31 1,037,701.89 10,748.58 0.00 2,013.88 3,819.44 1.25 FANNIE MAE 2.5% 05FE82024 0.00 1516.68) (8,577-75) 12 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4SECURITIES HELD CITY OF POWAY As of September 301 2019 ..... 00 o Cusip/ Coupon Maturity/ Par value or Historical cost/ Amortized cost/ Fair value/ Unrealized Interest Interest Total % -.. Call date shares Accrued interest Accretion Change in fair gain received earned accrued Port w Description ..... purchased (amortization) value Ooss) interest cost Government Agencies 3135GOV75 1.750 07/02/2024 2,000,000.00 2,007,920.00 2,007,860.31 2,011,404.20 3,543.89 0.00 1,069.44 7,972.22 2.43 FANNIE MAE 1. 75% 02JUL2024 (6,902.78) (59.69) 3,484.20 Total Government Agencies 43,750,000.00 44,022,870.06 44,084,166.64 44,304,426.46 220,259.82 51,875.00 72,416.54 233,318.22 53.31 {6,902.78) (3,604.64) (115,234.63) Government Bonds 912828G61 1.500 11/3012019 1,000,000.00 1,002,968.75 1,000,199.88 999,084.50 (1,115.38) 0.00 1,229.51 5,000.00 1.21 USA TREASURY 1.5% 0.00 (98.31) 412.62 30NOV2019 9128283Y4 2.250 02/2912020 1,500,000.00 1,492, 148.44 1,497,822.20 1,502,109.38 4,287.18 16,875.00 2,781.59 2,781.59 1.81 USA TREASURY 2.25% 0.00 429.83 (234.371 29FEB2020 9128282Q2 1 .500 08/15/2020 2,000,000.00 1,990,156.25 1,996,911.76 1,994,062.50 (2,849.26) 0.00 2,445.65 3,750.00 2.41 USA TREASURY 1.5% 0.00 289.52 (390.62) 15AUG2020 912828F21 2.125 09130/2021 1,000,000.00 991,015.63 993,057.53 1,009, 179.69 16,122.16 10,625.00 1,741.80 0.00 1.20 USA TREASURY 2.125% 0.00 284.91 (3,164.06) 30SEP2021 9128285F3 2.875 10/15/2021 1,500,000.00 1,515,878.91 1,512,442.93 1,536,621.09 24,178.16 0.00 3,534.83 19,795.08 l.84 USA TREASURY 2.875% 0.00 (500.38) (5,566.41) 150CT2021 912828XW5 1.750 06/30/2022 1,000,000.00 998,515.63 998,661.00 1,004,375.00 5,714.00 0.00 1,426.63 4,375.00 1.21 USA TREASURY 1.75% 0.00 40.01 (4,375.00) 30JUN2022 912828l57 1.750 09/3012022 1,000,000.00 999,417.41 999,462.07 1,004,960.94 5,498.87 8,750.00 1,434.43 0.00 1.21 USA TREASURY 1 .75% 0.00 14.72 (4,531.25) 305EP2022 9128282D1 1.375 08/3112023 2,000,000.00 1,967,109.38 1,968,705.80 1,985,468.76 16,762.96 13,750.00 2,266.48 2,266.48 2.38 USA TREASURY 1.375% 0.00 656.06 {11,250.00) 31AUG2023 13 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4SECURITIES HELD CITY OF POWAY As of September 30, 2019 -co o Cusipt Coupon Maturity! Par value or Historical cosu Amortized cosU Fair value/ Unrealized Interest Interest Total % :Description Call date shares Accrued interest Accretion Change in fair gain received earned accrued Port -purchased (amortization) value (loss) interest cost Government Bonds 912828U57 2.125 11/3012023 1,900,000.00 1,925,679.69 1,924,504.38 1,941,859.38 17,355.00 0.00 3,309.42 13,458.33 2.33 USA TREASURY 2.125% 0.00 (483.00) (13,062.50) 30NOV2023 912828X70 2.000 04/30/2024 2,000,000.00 2,036,015.63 2,035,951.20 2,038,046.88 2,095.68 0.00 0.Dl 16,630.44 2.47 USA TREASURY 2% 30APR2024 {16,630.431 (64.43) 2,031.25 Total Government Bonds 14,900,000.00 14,918,905.72 14,927,718.75 15,015,768.12 88,04937 50,000.00 20,17035 68,056.92 18.07 (16,630.43) 568.93 (40,130.34) -rand total 81.950,000.00 82,573,657.78 82,564,038.14 82,943,349.37 379,311.23 153,500.00 134,291.05 445.610.90 '100.00 L. _ _ _ (33~330.08) --(8,8~7.8~. (188,~1~0~)-_ . _ --_______ ___:iJ 14 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4GASB 40 -DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT RISK DISCLOSURE CITY OF POWAY As of September 30, 2019 N 0 g,cusip Description Coupon Maturity Call date S&P Moody Par value or Historical %Portfolio Market % Portfolio Effective w date rating rating shares cost hist cost value mkt value dur (yrs) ..... United States Treasury Note/Bond 91282BG61 USA TREASURY 1.5% 1.500 11/30/2019 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 1,002,968.75 1.21 999,084.50 1.20 0.17 9128283Y4 USA TREASURY 2.25% 2.250 02129/2020 AA+ Aaa 1,500,000.00 1,492,148.44 1.81 1,502,109.38 1.81 0.41 912828202 USA TREASURY 1.5% 1.500 08/15/2020 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 1,990,156.25 2.41 1,994,062.50 2.40 0.86 912828F21 USA TREASURY 2.125% 2.125 09/3012021 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 991,015.63 1.20 1,009,179.69 1.22 1.95 9128285F3 USA TREASURY 2.875% 2.875 10/15/2021 AA+ Aaa 1,500,000.00 1,515,878.91 1.84 1,536,621.09 1.85 1.95 912828XW5 USA TREASURY 1.75% l.750 06/30/2022 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 998,515.63 1.21 1,004,375.00 1.21 2.66 912828L57 USA TREASURY 1.75% 1.750 09/30/2022 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 999,417.41 1.21 1,004,960.94 1.21 2.91 912828201 USA TREASURY 1.375% 1.375 08/31/2023 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 1,967,109.38 2.38 1,985,468.76 2.39 3.79 912828U57 USA TREASURY 2.125% 2.125 11/30/2023 AA+ Aaa 1,900,000.00 1,925,679.69 2.33 1,941 ,859.38 2.34 3.95 912828X70 USA TREASURY 2% 2.000 04/30/2024 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 2,036,015.63 2.47 2,038,046.88 2.46 4.33 Issuer total 14,900,000.00 14,918,905.72 18.07 15,015,768.12 18.10 2.47 Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corp 3133EGLA1 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 1.170 01/13/2020 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 1,999,780.00 2.42 1,996,293.64 2.41 0.29 3133EHYM9 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 1.500 09/14/2020 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 1,993,720.00 2.41 1,994,295.78 2.40 0.95 3133EGM51 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 1.650 12/01/2020 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 996,971.00 1.21 997,766.22 1.20 1.15 3133EKAJS FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 2.500 02/11/2021 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 999,265.00 1.21 1,009,061.93 1.22 1.34 3133EJJ02 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 2.540 04/05/2021 AA+ Aaa 1 ,000,000.00 1,004,390.00 1.22 1,012,474.71 1.22 1.46 3133EKCBO FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 2.500 07/01/2021 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 999,030.00 1.21 1,012,337.65 1.22 1.70 31331K3A6 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 2.710 12/13/2022 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 1,028,921.06 1.25 1,034,272.24 1.25 3.04 31331KAF7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 4.090 01/18/2023 AA+ Aaa 1,850,000.00 2,008,452.50 2.43 1,994,546.77 2.40 3.08 3133EKKT2 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 2.250 02/08/2023 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 1,017,480.00 1.23 1,020,717.92 l.23 3.22 3133EKVB9 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 1.860 l0/17/2023 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 1,997,646.00 2.42 2,019,924.88 2.44 3.87 Issuer total 13,850,000.00 14,045,655.56 17.01 14,091,691.74 16.99 2.03 15 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4GASB 40 -DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT iRISK DISCLOSURE CITY OF POWAY As of September 30, 2019 N .... g,cusip Description Coupon Maturity Call date S&P Moody Par value or Historical % Portfolio Market % Portfolio Effective w date rating rating shares cost hist cost value mktvalue dur (yrs) .... Federal Home Loan Banks 3130M2HO FEDERAL HOME LOAN 1.125 11/29/2019 AA+ Aaa 1 ,000,000.00 997,150.00 1.21 998,816.85 1.20 0.16 3130AECJ7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 2.625 05/28/2020 AA+ Aaa 1,500,000.00 1,497,100.50 1.81 1,507,300.70 1.82 0.65 3130ABY34 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 1.613 05129/2020 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 1,994,820.00 2.42 1,997,050.08 2.41 0.65 3130AEWA4 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 2.625 10/01/2020 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 1,990,580.00 2.41 2,015,499.82 2.43 0.98 3130A3UQ5 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 1.875 12/1112020 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 997,820.00 1.21 1,000,418.53 1.21 1.17 313379RB7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 1.875 06/1112021 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 985,600.00 1.19 1,002,223.57 1.21 1.65 3130MBG2 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 1.875 11/29/2021 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 990,090.00 1.20 1,004,071.00 1.21 2.10 313378CRO FEDERAL HOME LOAN 2.250 03/11/2022 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 2,004,000.00 2.43 2,028,635.82 2.45 2.36 3130A3VC5 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 2.250 12/08/2023 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 1,014,600.00 1.23 1,023,689.53 1.23 3.96 Issuer total 12,500,000.00 12,471,760.50 15.10 12,577,705.90 15.16 1.44 Federal National Mortgage Association 3135GOR39 FANNIE MAE 1% 1.000 10/24/2019 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 983,180.00 1.19 999,397.79 1.20 0.07 3136G4DA8 FANNIE MAE 1.2% 1.200 12/30/2019 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 998,250.00 1.21 998,342.29 1.20 0.25 3136G4KD4 FANNIE MAE 1.75% 1.750 06/29/2020 12/29/2019 AA+ Aaa 1,900,000.00 1 ,899,525.00 2.30 1,895,540.47 2.29 0.66 3135GOU35 FANNIE MAE 2.75% 2.750 06/22/2021 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 2,017,500.00 2.44 2,035,456.96 2.45 1.67 3135C-OU92 FANNIE MAE 2.625% 2.625 01/11/2022 AA-,. Aaa 1,500,000.00 1,513,185.00 1.83 1,532,042.78 1.85 2.20 3135GOU43 FANNIE MAE 2.875% 2.875 09112/2023 AA+ Aaa 1 ,000,000.00 1,039,050.00 1.26 1,047,994.30 1.26 3.73 3135GOV34 FANNIE MAE 2.5% 2.500 02/05/2024 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 1,028,090.00 1.25 1,037,701.89 1.25 4.10 3135GOV75 FANNIE MAE 1.75% 1.750 07/02/2024 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 2,007,920.00 2.43 2,011,404.20 2.43 4.52 Issuer total 11,400,000.00 1 1,486,700.00 13.91 11,557,880.68 13.93 2.21 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 3134G3N30 FREDDIE MAC 1.5% 1 .500 10103/2019 AA;. Aaa 1,000,000.00 993,500.00 1.20 999,957.54 1.21 0.01 3137EAEE5 FREDDIE MAC 1.5% 1.500 01/17/2020 AA+ Aaa 3,000,000.00 2,957,514.00 3.58 2,996,334.00 3.61 0.30 16 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4GASB 40 -DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT RISK DISCLOSURE CITY OF POWAY As of September 30, 2019 N N s,cusip Description Coupon Maturity Call date S&P Moody Par value or Historical % Portfolio Market % Portfolio Effective w date rating rating shares cost hist cost value mkt value dur {yrs) -Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 3l37EAEN5 FREDDIE MAC 2.75% 2.750 06/19/2023 AA+ Aila 2,000,000.00 2,067,740.00 2.50 2,080,856.60 2.51 3.50 Issuer total 6,000,000.00 6,018,754.00 7.29 6,077,148.14 7.33 1.35 PNC Bank NA 69353RES3 PNC BANK NA 2.6% 2.600 07121/2020 06/21/2020 A A2 1,000,000.00 1,016,010.00 1.23 1,003,914.08 1.21 0.72 69353RFL7 PNC BANK NA 3.5% 3.500 06/0812023 05/09/2023 A A2 1,900,000.00 1,995,436.00 2.42 1,994,928.31 2.41 3.36 Issuer total 2,900,000.00 3,011 ,446.00 3.65 2,998,842.39 3.62 2.47 Toyota Motor Credit Corp 89233P7F7 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT 2.625 01/10/2023 AA-Aa3 2,000,000.00 2,001,380.00 2.42 2,045,092.66 2.47 3.11 Issuer total 2,000,000.00 2,001,380.00 2.42 2,045,092.66 2.47 3.11 Coca-Cola Co/The 191216BT6 COCA-COLA CO/THE 1.875 10/27/2020 A+ Al 2,000,000.00 1,987,240.00 2.41 2,000,902.16 2.41 1.05 Issuer total 2,000,000.00 1,987,240.00 2.41 2,000,902.16 2.41 1.05 US Bancorp 91159HHV5 US BANCORP 3.375% 3.375 02/05(2024 01105/2024 A+ Al 1,900,000.00 1,999,636.00 2.42 1,998,460.51 2.41 3.96 Issuer total 1,900,000.00 1,999,636.00 2.42 1,998,460.51 2.41 3.96 TWDC Enterprises 18 Corp 25468PDP8 TWDC ENTERPRISES 18 1.950 03104/2020 A A2 1,500,000.00 1,504,635.00 1.82 1,499,301.29 1.81 0.42 Issuer total 1,500,000.00 1,504,635.00 1.82 1,499,301.29 1.81 0.42 PepsiCo Inc 713448(55 PEPSICO JNC 1.85% 1.850 04/30/2020 0313012020 A+ A1 1,500,000.00 1,499,655.00 1.82 1,498,811.57 1.81 0.55 Issuer total 1,500,000.00 1,499,655.00 1.82 1,498,811.57 1.81 0.55 17 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4GASB 40 -DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT RISK DISCLOSURE CITY oc POWAY As of September 30, 2019 ....., w sa_cusip Description Coupon Maturity Call date S&P Moody Par value or Historical % Portfolio Market % Portfolio Effective w date rating rating shares cost hist cost value mktvalue dur (yrs) ..... Microsoft Corp 594918AYO MICROSOFT CORP 1.85% 1.850 02/12/2020 01/12/2020 AAA Aaa 1,500,000.00 1 ,506, 140.00 1.82 1,498,745.97 1.81 0.35 Issuer total 1,500,000.00 1,506,140.00 1.82 1,498,745.97 1.81 0.35 Berkshire Hathaway Inc 084670BR8 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY 2.750 03/15/2023 01/15/2023 AA Aa2 1,000,000.00 1,021,370.00 1.24 1,025,129.98 1.24 3.17 Issuer total 1,000,000.00 1,021,370.00 1.24 1,025,129.98 1.24 3.17 Walmartlnc 931142DH3 WALMART INC 2.55% 2.550 04/11/2023 01/11/2023 AA Aa2 1,000,000.00 1,015,270.00 1.23 1,020,335.41 1.23 3.16 Issuer total 1,000,000.00 1,015,270.00 1.23 1,020,335.41 1.23 3.16 Apple Inc 037833AK6 APPLE INC 2.4% 2.400 05/03/2023 AA+ Aal 1,000,000.00 1,007,920.00 1.22 1,016,469.15 1.23 3.39 Issuer total 1 ,000,000.00 1,007,920.00 1.22 1,016,469.15 1.23 3.39 Oracle Corp 68389X8l8 ORACLE CORP 2.4% 2.400 09/15/2023 07/15/2023 A+ Al 1,000,000.00 1,008,750.00 1.22 1,012,351.81 1.22 3.66 Issuer total 1,000,000.00 1,008,750.00 1.22 1,012,351.81 1.22 3.66 Cisco Systems Inc 17275RAH5 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.450 01/15/2020 AA-Al 1,000,000.00 1,070, 170.00 1.30 1,006,595.06 1.21 0.29 Issuer total 1,000,000.00 1,070,170.00 1.30 1,006,595.06 1.21 0.29 Automatic Data Processing Inc 053015AD5 AUTOMATIC DATA 2.250 09/15/2020 08/15/2020 AA Aa3 1,000,000.00 1,002,630.00 1.21 1,002,763.21 1.21 0.89 Issuer total 1,000,00D.OO 1,002,630.0D 1.21 1,002,763.21 1.21 0.89 18 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4GASB 40 -DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT RISK DISCLOSURE CITY OF POWAY As of September 30, 2019 N ~ s_cusip Description Coupon Maturity Call date S&P Moody Par value or Historical % Portfolio Market % Portfolio Effective (,) date rating rating shares cost hist cost value mktvalue dur (yrs) ~ Caterpillar Financial Services Corp 14912l6F3 CATERPILLAR FINL 2.250 12/01/2019 A A3 1,000,000.00 1,011,910.00 1.23 1,000,165.89 1.21 0.17 Issuer total 1,000,000.00 1,011,910.00 1.23 1,000,165.89 1.21 0.17 JPMorgan Chase & Co 48127HAA7 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.200 10/22/2019 A-A2 1,000,000.00 990,780.00 1.20 1,000,015.33 1.21 0.06 Issuer total 1,000,000.00 990,780.00 1.20 1,000,015.33 1.21 0.06 American Honda Finance Corp 02665WBZ3 AMERICAN HONDA 2.000 11/13/2019 A A2 1,000,000.00 993,010.00 1.20 999,990.00 1.21 0.12 Issuer total 1,000,000.00 993,010.00 1.20 999,990.00 1.21 0.12 Pfizer Inc 717081EB5 PFIZER INC 1.7% 1.700 12115/2019 AA-Al 1,000,000.00 999,940.00 1.21 999,182.40 1.20 0.21 Issuer total 1,000,000.00 999,940.00 1.21 999,182.40 1.20 0.21 .. . . 19 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4SECURITIES PURCHASED CITY OF POWAY For the period September 1, 2019 -September 30, 2019 N 01 o Cusip I Description / Broker Trade date Coupon Maturity/ Par value or Unit cost Principal Accrued -Settle date Call date shares cost interest purchased w .... Corporate Bonds 91159HHV5 09/27/2019 3.375 02/05/2024 1,900,000.00 105.24 (1,999,636.00) [9,796.87) US BANCORP 3.375% 05FEB2024 (CALLABLE 05JAN24) 09/30/2019 01/05/2024 U.S. BANCORP INVESTMENTS, INC. Total Corporate Bonds 1,900,000.00 (1,999,636.00) (9,796.87) Government Agencies 3135GOV75 09/18/2019 1.750 07/02/2024 2,000,000.00 100.40 (2,007,920.00) (6,902.78) FANNIE MAE 1.75% 02JUL2024 09/19/2019 CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS LIMITED Total Government Agencies 2,000,000.00 (2,007,920.00) (6,902.78) Government Bonds 912828X70 09/27/2019 2.000 04/30/2024 2,000,000.00 101.80 (2,036,015.63) (16,630.43) USA TREASURY 2% 30APR2024 09/30/2019 BARCLAYS BANK PLC Total Government Bonds 2,000,000.00 (2,036,015.63) (16,630.43) 20 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4SECURITIES SOLD AND MATURED CITY OF POWAY ~ For the period September 1, 2019 -September 30, 2019 en o Cusip/ Trade date Coupon Maturity/ Par value or Historical cost Amortized cost Price Fair value at Realized Accrued Interest Interest : Description/ Settle date Call date shares at sale or maturity sale or maturity I gain interest received earned _..Broker /Acer (amort) Chg.in fair value (loss) sold Corporate Bonds 90331HML4 09/30/2019 2.125 n ,900,000.ooi 1,886,035.00 1,898,934.55 0.00 1,900,000.00 1,065.45 0.00 16,822.92 3,028.13 US BANK NA CINCINNA Tl 09/30/2019 1,141.55 289.73 2.125% 280CT2019 (CALLABLE 30SEP19) Total (Corporate Bonds) (1,900,000.00) 1,886,035.00 1,898,934.55 1,900,000.00 1,065.45 0.00 16,822.92 3,028.13 1,141.55 289.73 Government Agencies 3136G36X8 09/13/2019 1.140 (2,000,000.00) 1,998,000.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 11,400.00 760.00 FNMA DTD 9/13/2016 1.14 09/13/2019 24.07 475.42 09· 13-2019/06-13-2019 Total (Government Agencies) (2,000,000.00) 1,998,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 11,400.00 76-0.00 24.07 475.42 Government Bonds 912828F39 09/30/2019 1.750 (2,000,000.00) 2,017,265.62 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 17,500.00 2,868.85 USA TREASURY 1.75% 09130/2019 (618.22) 479.32 30SEP2019 Total (Government Bonds) (2,000,000.00) 2,017,265.62 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 17,500.00 2,868.85 (618.22) 479.32 21 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4TRANSACTION REPORT Cln'OFPOWAY For the period September 1, 2019 -September 30, 2019 ..., ...... o Trade date Cusip Transaction Sec type Description Maturity Par value or Realized Principal Interest Transaction total :settle date shares gain{loss) .... 08/31/2019 912828201 Income Government Bonds USA TREASURY l .375% 08/31/2023 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 13,750.00 13,750.00 08/31/2019 08/31/2019 9128283Y4 Income Government Bonds USA TREASURY 2.25% 02/29/2020 1,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 16,875.00 16,875.00 08/3112019 09104/2019 25468PDP8 Income Corporate Bonds TWDC ENTERPRISES 18 CORP 09/0412019 03/04/2020 1,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 14,625.00 14,625.00 09111/2019 313378CRO Income Government Agencies FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 09/11/2019 03/11/2022 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 22,500.00 22,500.00 09/12/2019 3135GOU43 Income Government Agencies FANNIE MAE 2.875% 09/12/2023 09/12/2019 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 14,375.00 14,375.00 09/1312019 3136G36X8 Income Government Agencies FNMA DTD 9/13/2016 1.14 09113/2019 09/1312019 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 11,400.00 11,400.00 09/13/2019 3136G36X8 Capital Change Government Agencies FNMA DTD 9/13/2016 1.14 09113/2019 09/13/2019 (2,000,000.00) 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 09/14/2019 3133EHYM9 Income Government Agencies FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 09/1412020 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 09/14/2019 09115/2019 053015AD5 Income Corporate Bonds AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSNG 09/1512020 1.000,000.00 0.00 0.00 11,250.00 11,250.00 09/15/2019 09115/2019 084670BR8 Income Corporate Bonds BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 0311512023 09/15/2019 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 13,750.00 13,750.00 09/1512019 68389XBL8 Income Corporate Bonds ORACLE CORP 2.4% 1 SSEP2023 09115/2023 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 09/15/2019 09/18/2019 3135GOV75 Bought Government Agencies FANNIE MAE 1. 75% 02JUL2024 09119/2019 07102/2024 2,000,000.00 0.00 12,007,920.001 (6,902.78) (2,014,822.78) 09/27/2019 91159HHVS Bought Corporate Bonds US BANCORP 3.375% 02/05/2024 1,900,000.00 0.00 {1,999,636.001 (9,796.871 (2,009,432.87) 09/30/2019 09/27/2019 912828X70 Bought Government Bonds USA TREASURY 2% 30APR2024 09/30/2019 04/30/2024 2,000,000.00 0.00 (2,036,015.63) (16,630.43) (2,052,646.06) 09/2812019 90331HML4 Income Corporate Bonds US BANK NA CINCINNATI 10128/2019 0912812019 1,900,000.00 0.00 0.00 16,822.92 16,822.92 0913012019 90331HML4 Capital Change Corporate Bonds US BANK NA CINCINNATI 10/28/2019 (1,900,000.00) 1,065.45 1,900,000.00 0.00 1,900,000.00 09/3012019 09130/2019 912828F2l Income Government Bonds USA TREASURY 2_ 125% 09(3012021 09/3012019 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,625.00 10,625.00 22 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4TRANSACTION REPORT CITY OF POWAY For the period September 1, 2019 -September 30, 2019 N co o Trade date Cusip Transaction Sec type Description Maturity Par value or Realized Principal Interest Transaction total :settle date shares gain(loss) ..... 09/3012019 912828F39 Income Government Bonds USA TREASURY 1.75% 09/3012019 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 17,500.00 17,500.00 09/3012019 09/3012019 912828F39 Capital Change Government Bonds USA TREASURY 1.75% 09/30/2019 09/30/2019 12,000,000.00) 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 09/30/2019 912828l57 Income Government Bonds USA TREASURY 1.75% 0913012022 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 8,750.00 8,750.00 09/30/2019 23 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Cl'f\' OF POWAY As of September 30, 2019 ~Past performance lS not a guide co fucu re performance_ The value of invescmems and any income from them will fluctuate and is not guaranteed (this may partly be due to exchange rate changes) and investors may not get o back the amount invested. Transacuons in foreign serurities may be executed and settled in local markets. Performance comparisons will be affected by changes in interest rates. Investment rerurns fluctuate due to change-, ...,in market conditions. Investment mvol11es nsk, including the possible loss of principal. No assurance can be given that the performance objecnves of a given strategy will be achieved. The information contained herein is for ~your reference only and is being provided m response to your specific request and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable; however, no representation is made regarding its accuracy or completeness. This document must noc be used for the purpose of an offer or solicitation many 1urisd1ct1on orin any circumstances in which such offer or solrcitatlon 1s unlawful or otherwise not permitted. This document should not be duphcated. amended, or forwarded to a third party without consent from lnslghL This 1s a markebng document intended for professional clients only and should not be made available co or relied upon by retail clients Investment advisory services m North America are provided through two different SEC-registered investment advisers using the brand Insight Investment: Insight North America LLC (INA) and Insight lnvesunent International limited (IIIL). The North American investment advisers are associated with a broader group of global investment managers that also (individually and coltectiVely} use the corporate brand Insight Investment and may be referred to as Insight. Insight Group or Insight Investment. INA 1s an investment adviser register eel with the Securit1es and Exchange Commission (SEQ, under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration with the SEC does not imply a certain level of skill ortraining. You may request. without charge. additional information about Insight. Moreover, specific information relating to Insights strategies, including investment advisory fees, may be obtained from INA's Form ADV Part 2A, whtch IS available without charge upon request. Where indicated, performance numbers used m the analysis are gross returns. The performance reflects the reinvestment of all dividends and income. INA charges management fees on all portfolios managed and lhese fees will reduce the rerurns on !he portfolios. For example, assume that $30 million 1s invested In an account with INA, and this account achieves a 5.0% annual return compounded monthly, gross of fees. for a period of iive years. At the end of five years that account would have grown to $38,500,760 before the deduction of management fees. Assuming management fees of 0.2S% per year are deducted monthly irom the account. the value at the end ol the five year period would be $38,022,447. Actual fees for new accounts are dependent on size and subject to negotiaoon. INA's mvestment advisory fees are discussed m Part 2A of its Form ADV. Unless otherwise stated, the source of information 1s lnsighr. Any forecasts or opinions are Insights own at the date of this document (or as otherwise specified) and may change. Material on this publication is for general information only and 1s not advice, investment advice, or the recommendation of any purchase or sale of any security. Insight makes no implied or expressed recommendations concerning the manner in which an account should or would be handled, as appropariate investment strategies depend upon specific mvestment guidelines and objectives and should not be construed to be an assurance that any particular security in a strategy will remain 1n any fund, account, or strategy, or that a previously held security will not be repurchased. It should not be assumed that any of the security uansactions or holdings referenced herein have been or will prove to be profitable or that future investment decisions will be prof,tabte or will equal or exceed the past investment performance of the securities listed. Please compare the mformatJon provided in this statement to the information provided in the statement received from your Custodian. For trading activity the Clearing broker wdl be reflected. In certain cases the Clearing broker will differ from the Executing broker. In calculating ratings distnbutions and weighted average portfoho quality. Insight assigns U.S Treasury and U.S agency securities a quality rating based on the methodology used within the respective benchmark index. When Moodys, S&P and Fitch rate a security, Sank of Amenca and Merrilt Lynch indexes assign a simple weighted average statistic while Barclays indexes assign the median statistic. Insight assigns all other securities the lower of Moodys and S&P ratings. Information about the indices shown here 1s provided to allow for comparison of the performance of the strategy 10 that of certatn well-known and widely recognized indices. There 1s no representation that such mdex is an appropriate benchmark for such comparison. You cannot invest directly In an index and the indices represented do not take mto account trading commissions and/or other brokerage or custodial costs. The volatility of the indices may be materialty different from tharof the strategy. In addition, the strategys holdings may differ substantialty from the secunt1es that compnse the indices shown. The BofA Merrill Lynch 3 Mo UST ·Bitl index is an unmanaged man<et index of U.S. Treasury securities maturing in 90 days that assumes reinvestment of all income. rne BofA Merrill Lynch 6 Mo UST-Bill index measures the performance ofTreasury bills with time to maturity of less than 6 months. The BofA Merrill lynch Current 1-Year US Treasury Index is a one-security mdex comprised of the most recently issued 1-year US Treasury note. The index 1s rebalanced monthly. In order to qualify for inclusion, a 1-year note must be auctioned on or before the third business day before the last business day of the month. The BofA Merrill lynch Current 3-YearUSTreasury Index Is a one-security index comprised of the most recently issued 3-year US Treasury note. The index IS rebalanced monthly. In order to qualify for inclusion, a 3-year note must be auctioned on or before the third business day before the last business day of the month. The BofA Mernll lynch Current 5-Year US Treasury Index 1s a one-security index compnsed of the most recently issued S-year US Treasury note. The index Is rebalanced monthly. In order to qualify for inclusron, a 5-year note must be auctioned on or before the third business day before the last business day of the month. The BofA Merrill lynch 1·3 US Year Treasury Index is an unmanaged index that tracks the performance ofthe direct sovereign debt of the U.S. Government having a maturity of at least one year and less than three years. The BofA Merrell lynch l·S US Year Treasury Index 1s an unmanaged Index that tracks the performance of the direct sovereign debt of the U.S. Government having a maturity of at least one year and less than five years. 24 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4(,.) 0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION As of September 30, 2019 CITY OF POWAY o Insight does not provide tax or legal advice to its clients and all fnvestors are strongly urged to consult their tax and legal advisors regarding any potential strategy or investment -~Insight is a group of wholly owned subs1dianes of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and may also be used as a generic term to reference the Corporation as a whole or its various subsidianes generally. Products and services may be provided under various brand names and in various countries by subsidiaries, affiliates and joint ventures oflhe Bank of New York Mellon Corporation where authorized and regulated as required within each jurisdiction. Unless you are notified to the contrary, the products and services mentioned are not insured by the FDIC (or by any governmental entity! and are not guaranteed by or obligations of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation or any of its affiliates. The Bank of New Yorlc Corporation assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the above data and disclaims all expressed or implied warranties in connecbon therewith. © 2019 Insight Investment. All rights reserved. 25 November 19, 2019, Item #1.4w .... 0 -w .... )> ~ 0 :::c 3: m z --t C City of Poway Investments & Cash with Fiscal Agent; Non-Managed Investments; General, Payroll & Petty Cash September 2019 Part I Investments 6: Cash with Fiscal A11ents Settlement I Yield to I Days to, I % of Total I Face I Book I Market I Unrealized I INVESTMENT DESCRIPTION Date Maturity Maturity Investment Value Value Value Gain(Loss) 1st Am Gov't Obligations Money Mkt Fd 09130119 1 1.38%1 __ _!1 100.00%1 $474, 172.26 1 $474, 172.26 I $474,172.261 so.oo 1 ___ _J J I I I I I ______ _J I ______ _J I I I I I _____ __J. I _______ _J I I I I Average/Total -·----_ _J 1.38%'--~ 100.00%1 $474, 172.26 1 $474, 1 n.26 1 $474,172.261 so.oo 1 Paying Agent or Uninvested Cash & DITs ----I so.oo 1 -I Total Investments and Cash with Fiscal Agent -. -I $474,172.26 I -I Part II Non-Mana11ed Investments Settlement I Yield to I Days to ,1 % of Total I Face I Book I Market I Unrealized I INVESTMENT DESCRIPTION Date Maturity Maturity Investment Value Value Value Gain(Loss) County Pool 09130119 I 2.18%1 11 53.06%1 ss6,s1s.s1 1 ss6,s1 s.s1 I ss6,78o.oo 1 $264.491 Wells-Fargo CD os1os119 I 0.05%1 3091 46.94%1 sso,000.00 I sso,000.00 I sso,000.00 I so.oo I Average/Total -I 1.18%1 N/A I 100.00%1 s106,s1 s.s1 1 s106,s1 s.s1 1 s106,?80.oo I $264.49 1 Part Ill General Pavroll 6: Pettv Cash Book Value General Cash (Union Bank) ----I $538,442.93 -I Payroll Cash (Union Bank) -I s20,ooo.oo 1 -I Emergency Cash (Union Bank) -I s10,ooo.oo 1 -I Grant Cash (Union Bank) --I so.oo 1 -I Flexible Benefits Cash (Union Bank) -----I s20,ooo.oo 1 --I Petty Cash -I $8,soo.oo 1 -I Total Cash --. --l $596,942.931 -I ··---~--- November 19, 2019, Item #1.5 DATE: TO: FROM: CONTACT: SUBJECT: Summary: City of Poway COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT November 19, 2019 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Aaron Beanan, Director of Finance ~ Brad Rosen, Information Technology Manager ~ (858) 668-4452 or brosen@poway.org Approval of the Add-On of Software Licensing to the Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA) from Crayon Software Experts, LLC The City's current three-year Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA) was approved with Crayon Software Experts, LLC in April 2019 and is valid until April 2022. The EA provides the City with the most cost-effective method for maintaining our current technology environment including all software for servers, desktops, office automation software and database licensing. The proposed Microsoft security licensing add-on includes the Office 365 Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) and the Windows desktop ATP products. Each of these products enhance the City's information security infrastructure and help to minimize risk for cybersecurity events. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to purchase add-on software licensing to our Microsoft EA with Crayon Software Experts, LLC. Discussion: Information Technology staff have an increased focus on the security of the City's network, servers, desktops and databases due to growing cyber threats. As part of this increased focus, over the past several years the City has invested in improving the security infrastructure with the purchase of new firewalls, enhanced backup/restore software, consulting with a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), and the implementation of phishing testing and training for all staff. The City has also made configuration changes to its Microsoft 365 environment and network to block countries with known threat actors, and have also implemented data loss prevention to limit the loss of personally identifiable information through email. In the past year, there has been a steady increase of cybersecurity attacks on state and local government agencies. Based on information on Statescoop.com, more than 100 public-sector ransomware attacks have been reported in 2019 so far, compared to 51 reported in 2018. Significant cyber events reported nationally in the media over the past year include the City of Baltimore, City of Atlanta, multiple agencies in Texas, and several local governments in Florida. Recovery costs for the larger agencies were in the millions of dollars; some of the smaller agencies resorted to paying ransoms up to $600,000. 1 of 4 November 19, 2019, Item #1.5 Recent cyberattacks within San Diego County include ransomware at the Port of San Diego in 2018 and the City of San Marcos in October 2019, which caused significant system downtime for those agencies. In recent years, the Cities of Oceanside, Thousand Oaks and Oxnard each had utility payment and/or customer information compromised. Experts predict that ransomware and other cyberattacks including malware, data breaches and denial of service attacks against state and local government will continue to increase. The Poway Budget Review Committee, as part of their presentation to Council in June, identified concern over the increase in cybersecurity events at other agencies in the country. They indicated in their presentation to Council that "staff should remain vigilant against cybersecurity threats." They recognized that when cyber events strike local agencies, it diminishes the ability for cities to perform critical functions, including emergency operations, work order management, accounts payable and payroll. Microsoft has recently made available security products as add-on licenses to our existing licensing agreement with Crayon Software Experts, LLC. The additional features that these products provide enhance the security framework in the City to help minimize the risk for cybersecurity events. 1) Office 365 ATP -Cloud-based email filtering service that helps protect organizations against unknown malware and viruses by providing robust zero-day protection and includes features to safeguard the organization from harmful links in real time. Zero- day attacks occur when an attacker has exploited a software flaw before the developer has mitigated for it. Zero-day protection is protection against threats which haven't been identified as threats yet. ATP has rich reporting and URL trace capabilities that give administrators insight into the kind of attacks happening in the organization. 2) Windows Defender ATP -Platform design to help enterprise networks prevent, detect, investigate and respond to advanced threats. Windows Defender ATP detects attacks and zero-days using advanced behavioral analytics and Machine Learning to uncover breach of network in an organization. With Windows 10 ATP, the City can quickly respond to contain a cybersecurity attack and prevent reoccurrence of a future security breach. It uses the following combination of technology built into Windows 10 and Microsoft's robust cloud service. • Endpoint behavioral sensors: Embedded in Windows 10, these sensors collect and process behavioral signals from the operating system and send this sensor data to your private, isolated, cloud instance of Microsoft Defender ATP. • Cloud security analytics: Leveraging big-data, machine-learning and unique Microsoft optics across the Windows ecosystem, enterprise cloud products (such as Office 365) and online assets, behavioral signals are translated into insights, detections, and recommended responses to advanced threats. • Threat intelligence: Generated by Microsoft hunters, security teams, and augmented by threat intelligence provided by partners, threat intelligence enables Microsoft Defender ATP to identify attacker tools, techniques, and procedures, and generate alerts when these are observed in collected sensor data. Crayon Software Experts, LLC was selected in April 2019 by the City Council for the purchase of our Microsoft EA, which includes all Microsoft licensing used in the City. Add-on licensing to the 2 of4 November 19, 2019, Item #1.5 EA must be purchased through Crayon Software Experts as the holder of the City of Poway EA. Microsoft li censing is based on a monthly charge per user or device. Cost for Office 365 ATP is $1 .40 a month per user (336 users) and licensing required for Wi ndows Defender ATP is $5.10 a month per device (303 devices). The City has two years and five months remaining under the current EA term . If the add-on licensing is approved by Council , the City would be required to purchase these licenses for the remainder of the agreement term. Licensing cost in year one is $10,078.50 (5 months of service), $24,188.40 for year two, and $24,188.40 for year three. Total cost added to the Microsoft agreement is $58,455.30. Additional true-up yearly costs would be determined at the end of each contract year based on any additional licensing required due to the addition of staff or software applications requiring Microsoft licensing. Environmental Review: This action is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Fiscal Impact: The total cost of the add-on licensing is $58,445.30. Council approval of staff's recommendation would result in an additional appropriation of $58,445.30 from the General Fund 's Undesignated Fund Balance (F1000-89010) to the 113010-61222 account to cover the add-on licensing. Sufficient funds are available in the General Fund 's Undesignated Fund Balance for this request. Similar to other City assets, rent for this add-on licensing will be included in future years' budgets to ensure funding is available for future agreements. Public Notification: None. Attachments: A . Quote: Crayon Software Experts, LLC Reviewed/Approved By : Wendy aserman Assistant City Manager 3 of4 Reviewed By : Alan Fenstermacher City Attorney Approved By: Ch~ City Manager November 19, 2019, Item #1.5@crayon Quote Date: 10.30.19 Part Number AAA-22326 3GU-00001 AAA-22326 3GU-00001 IAAA-22.326 3GU-00001 Customer Otyof Poway Attn: Brad Rosen brosen@poway.org Description Add-On to Enrollment 80743000 • Annual Option Year 1 -Coverage Dates 11/5/H-4/3'J/202JJ WinESAddOntoWinEntperOVC ALNG SubsVL MVL Aooun 0365AdvTllrtPrtctPlnlGCC ShrdSvr ALNG SubsVL MVL Pe.-Usr Year 2 -Coverage Dates 5/1/2071J-4/'3-0/2021 WinE5"'1o0ntoWinEntperOVC ALNG SubsVL MVL AddOn 0365AdvThrtPrtctPlnlGCC ShrdSvr ALNG SubsVL MVL Pe<Usr Year 3 · Coverage Dates 5/1/2021-4/3'J/2022 WinES,..,oOntoWinEntperDVC ALNG SubsVL MVL AOaOn 0365AdvThrtPrtctPlnlGCC ShrdSvr ALNG SubsVL MVL PerUsr ·• Pricing Expires in 30 days from date of quote .. Unit Quantity Qty 5 5 12 12 12 12 •• Alt items included in this RfQ are new, unused, not refurbished, with original manufacturer warranty.•• Remit to Address: Crayon Software ExpertS, LLC Ann: Finance Manager 8111 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1000 Dallas, TX 75251 Phone: 469-329-0290 invoice.cus@myon.com 303 336 303 336 303 336 Monthly Net Unit Price Annual Net Unit Price s 5.10 s 25.50 s 1.40 $ 7.00 Total Year 1 Payment s S.10 $ 61.20 s 1.40 s 16.80 Total Year 2 Payment s 5.10 s 61.20 s 1.40 s 16.80 Total Year 3 Payment Total Deal Value Years 1-3 Quoted by: Crayon Software ExpertS llC 12221 Merit Drive, Suite 800 Dallas, TX 75251 Greg l..1ndry Pt>One: 469-329-0290 greg.landry@crayon.com Extended Amount s 7,726.50 s 2,352.00 $ 10,078.50 s 18,543.60 $ 5,644.80 $ 24,188.40 s 18,543.60 s 5,644.80 $ 24,188.40 $ 58,455.30 I <( t-z w :il: 3:: (.) ~ <( November 19, 2019, Item #1.6 DATE: TO: FROM: CONTACT: SUBJECT: Summary: City of Poway COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT November 19, 2019 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Cou7cil Eric Heidemann , Director of Public Works f li Pat Ryan , Interim Assistant Director of Public Works for Maintenance Operations (858) 668-4705 or pyran@poway.org Approval of the Appropriation of Funds for the Regiona l Water Quality Control Board 's Water Quality Certification Permit for Annual Concrete Channel Maintenance The City of Poway performs annual maintenance activities to concrete flood control channe ls to help reduce vectors, promote water quality and help reduce the threat of flooding by removing sediment. The City's maintenance activities are regulated by state and federal agencies. One of the required permits for the ma intenance activities is the Water Quality Certification Permit (Certification), issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The City's existing Certification expires August 20, 2020, and Certification renewal is required to continue annual maintenance activities. Staff is requesting City Council authorize an appropriation in the amount of $94,000 to secure a 10-year Certification to ca rry out the required annual concrete channel maintenance and programmatic activities. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the total amount of $94,000 for the RWQCB Certification for Annual Concrete Channel Maintenance covering the Certification cost for the duration of ten years . Discussion: The City's Stormwater Division performs annual maintenance in over five miles, or seven acres , of concrete channel bottoms throughout Poway to help reduce vectors, promote water quality and help reduce the threat of flooding by removing sediment. This maintenance activity is regulated by the Army Corp of Engineers, RWQCB and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The City is required to obtain respective agency permits prior to removing vegetation or sediment from waterways , wetlands and concrete channels . During maintenance activities , the City adheres to strict mitigation measures; such as biological monitoring, Best Management Practices (B MPs) to prevent discharges and compliance documentation (photographs, field reports , etc.). One of the required permits is the Certification , issued by the RWQCB , which is normally issued on a five-year term. The City was issued its current Certification in 2007. The Certification was amended in July 2010 to remove a maintenance site. The Certification was amended again in August 2012, to extend the Certification for an additional five-years to allow the City to conti nue its scheduled 1 of 3 November 19, 2019, Item #1.6 maintenance activities to August 2017. In 2017, the State Water Resources Control Board adopted a new fee calculator and new regulatory requirements. Prior to its Certification expiring in August 2017, City staff consulted with RWQCB officials to discuss changes to the fee calculator and regulatory requirements. As a result of the newly adopted fee calculator, RWQCB officials reclassed the City's permit fee category from a Category E (Low Impact) to a Category A (Fill and Excavation Discharges). The reclassification resulted in an increase to the Certification to $9,400/year, an increase of over 500 percent compared to the same permit amended in 2012, which cost $500, plus an annual maintenance fee of approximately $1,000. The City objected over the appropriateness of the Certification increase and the City's fee categorization. To allow time for the City to submit a new Certification application and resolve the fee issue, the City requested a time extension for the Certification, which was then amended in August 2017 to August 2018. The City continued to hold several discussions with RWQCB staff to obtain clarification relating to the City's concerns, at times involving the City Attorney and RWQCB Counsel. The fee dispute continued through 2018, and the Certification was amended again in June 2019, extending the Certification to August 20, 2020. The fee issues were recently resolved, resulting in resolution over the Certification fee and term. Under the new arrangement, the City will pay a Certification fee of $94,000 for a negotiated ten- year term. The ten-year term is significant because it will save the City countless hours of administrative staff time in applying for a Certification under what would have been a normally five-year term. In addition, the ten-year term ensures staff long-term certainty to carry out the necessary annual maintenance and programmatic activities without the potential for permit processing delays -delays which may pose flood risks to the community if maintenance activities were deferred for such reason. Certification permit fees were not budgeted in FY 2019-20. These funds were previously appropriated in the FY 2018-19 Budget, but due to the ongoing fee dispute lasting into the next fiscal year, funds were not re-appropriated. Now that the fee dispute has been resolved, this report requests Council re-appropriate funds for a ten-year Water Quality Certification. If approved, City staff would submit payment for the Certification in 2020 before the end of the fiscal year, since its current Certification is valid until August 2020. The new Certification expires ten years after the date of issuance allowing work activities to be certified until 2030. Environmental Review: This action is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Fiscal Impact: An appropriation in the amount of $94,000 from the Drainage Fund's (Fund 2310) fund balance to the Public Works Department, Stormwater and Flood Control Division (412040-57300) is requested. Sufficient funds are available in the Drainage Fund for this request. Public Notification: None. 2 of 3 November 19, 2019, Item #1.6 Attachments : None. Reviewed/Approved By: Wendaserman Assistant City Manager 3 of 3 - Reviewed By: Alan Fenstermacher City Attorney Approved By : City Manager November 19, 2019, Item #1.7 DATE: TO: City of Poway COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT November 19, 2019 FROM: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Counc9 1 ;\ Robert Manis, Director of Development Services (# \ Brian Banzuelo, Associate Civil Engineer ~ CONTACT: (858) 668-4623 or bbanzuelo@poway.org SUBJECT: Acceptance of the Poway Dam Security Upgrades Project ; Bid No. 19-011 with AToM Engineering Construction, Inc. as Complete Summary: On February 19, 2019, the City Council awarded the contract for the Poway Dam Security Upgrades Project; Bid No. 19-011 , to AToM Eng ineering Construction , Inc. in the amount of $140,398.00. This action will accept the project as complete . Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council: (1) Accept the Poway Dam Security Upgrades Project as complete ; (2) Authorize the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion ; (3) Authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $7,019.90, if unencumbered , 45 days after City Council acceptance; (4) Release the Developers Surety and Indemnity Company, Bond for Material and Labor in the amount of $140,398.00 after the release of retention ; and (5) Retain the Deve lopers Surety and Indemnity Company, Bond for Faithful Performance for a period of one year. Discussion: This project installed two pole mounted, solar powered , security cameras near Poway Dam at Lake Poway . There were no Change Orders for this project. Environmental Review: The matter of acceptance of public improvements that have been completed , which were the subject of a prior environmental determination , is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act. Fiscal Impact: Sufficient funds are available in the Poway Dam Maint. And Security account (WTR0015) for the release of retention . After the retention payment of $7 ,019 .00 , there will be an available balance of $228,967.31 . Funds remaining in the project at year end will be returned to the Water Enterprise Fund for use on future projects . 1 of 2 November 19, 2019, Item #1.7 Public Notification: None. Attachments: None. Reviewed/Approved By: Wendyserman Assistant City Manager 2 of 2 Reviewed By: Alan Fenstermacher City Attorney Approved By: c~ City Manager November 19, 2019, Item #3.1 DATE: TO: FROM: CONTACT: SUBJECT: Summary: City of Poway COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT November 19, 2019 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Councj,A Robert Manis, Director of Development Services '{N" Scott Nespor, Associate Planner ~~ A ..J (858) 668-4656 or snespor@poway.org Minor Development Review Application 19-028 and Variance 19-002: A request to allow a proposed addition to an existing single-family home to encroach into the front yard setback on the property located at 13205 Avenida La Valencia This is a Minor Development Review Application (MORA) and a Variance (VAR) request to allow the construction of a 951-square-foot attached addition to an existing single-family home to observe a 27-foot front yard setback where 40 feet is required by the Poway Municipal Code (PMC). The existing single-family home also observes a 27-foot front yard setback. The required findings to support MORA 19-028 and VAR 19-002 can be made based on unique circumstances applicable to the property. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Resolution. Discussion: A Variance is requested to allow an addition to an existing residence to observe a 27-foot front yard setback when the required setback in the Rural Residential C (RR-C) zone is 40 feet measured from the property l ine. The existing home currently observes a 27-foot front yard setback. The addition would match the existing front yard setback. The applicant believes that the encroachment into the front yard setback is necessary to allow the property owner to make an addition to the existing residence similar to other properties on the street. The applicant is Oscar Zazueta on behalf of the property owners, Andrea Dangio and Katherine Sack. The site is located at 13205 Avenida La Valencia , within the RR-C zone (Attachment 8 ). Chapter 17.50 PMC contains a provision whereby the City Council can allow a Variance from the terms of the Zoning Code because of special circumstances applicable to the property, which makes the strict application of the Code burdensome and restricts property rights that are enjoyed by others in the surrounding neighborhood. A Variance approval is required to allow an addition to encroach into a required front yard setback . The subject property is developed with a 2,368-square-foot, one-story residence with an attached three-car garage, which currently does not meet the required front and side yard setback. The existing home is legal nonconforming because it complied with the setbacks approved by the 1 of 13 November 19, 2019, Item #3.1 County at the time it was built. The applicant proposes to construct a 951-square-foot addition to the northeast corner of the existing home which faces the street (Attachments C, D, and E). The proposed addition and associated remodel of the existing living room will provide three additional bedrooms and create a new living room. The addition will be consistent with architecture and front yard setback of the existing home. It should be noted that the addition proposes an 11.5-foot side yard setback along the eastern property line which is less than the required 20-foot side yard setback. The existing home maintains an 11.5-foot setback along this property line. Per the PMC, the proposed side yard setback at less than 20 feet is permitted without a Variance because the setback would be equal to the existing non-conforming setback. This provision only applies to the side and rear yard setbacks. The required findings can be made to support the Variance to encroach into the front yard setback based on the fact that the following unique circumstances exist on the property, which make the strict application of the Zoning Code burdensome: • The 0.55-acre property was created prior to City incorporation and is substandard in size as the minimum lot size for the RR-C zone is one acre. • Other homes in the neighborhood and under similar zoning designation encroach into the front yard setback, some of which are located closer to the property line than the 27 feet requested by the applicant. The right-of-way of Avenida La Valencia is 84 feet wide, of which 40 feet is paved resulting in a wider unimproved right-of-way compared to what is required in the General Plan. As a result, the home would maintain a minimum 49-foot setback from the edge of the street. The project has been designed to comply with all development standards of the City, with the exception of the front yard setback for which the Variance is sought. As a result of the constraints listed above and the fact that the proposed enlarged home would be set back more than 40 feet from the street and partially obscured from view by landscaping, the required findings to support the Variance can be made and are set forth in the attached Resolution. Environmental Review: The project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as Classes 1 and 5 Categorical Exemptions, Sections 15301(e) and 15305(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, in that the project involves the construction of an addition to a single-family dwelling on an existing legal parcel located in a residential zone and the front yard setback variance will not result in changes in land use or density. Fiscal Impact: None. Public Notification: A notice of Public Hearing was published in the Poway News Chieftain on Thursday, November 7, 2019 and mailed to property owners and occupants located within 500 feet of the project site. 2 of 13 November 19, 2019, Item #3.1 Attachments: A . Resolution B . Zoning/Location Map C. S ite Plan D. Proposed Floor Plan E. Proposed Front Elevation Reviewed/Approved By: Assistant City Manager 3 of 13 Reviewed By: Alan Fenstermacher City Attorney Approved By: City Manager November 19, 2019, Item #3.1 RESOLUTION NO. P-19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 19-028 AND VARIANCE 19-002, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (APN): 275-620-17 WHEREAS, Minor Development Review Application (MORA) 19-028 and Variance (VAR) 19-002, submitted by Oscar Zazueta, Applicant and Architect, and Andrea Dangio and Katherine Sack, Property Owners, requests approval to allow a 951-square-foot addition located at 13205 Avenida La Valencia, within the Rural Residential C (RR-C) zone, to observe a 27-foot front yard setback where 40 feet is required; WHEREAS, on November 19, 2019, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing to solicit comments from the public, both for and against, relative to this application; WHEREAS, the City Council has read and considered the agenda report for the proposed project and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing; WHEREAS, the site, floor and elevation plans for this project included in the agenda report are incorporated herein as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Poway Municipal Code (PMC) establishes findings required for granting a Variance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Poway as follows: SECTION 1: The project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as Classes 1 and 5 Categorical Exemptions, Sections 15301 (e) and 15305(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, in that the project involves an addition to a single-family residence on an existing legal parcel located in a residential zone and the front yard setback variance will not result in changes in land use or density. The existing residence will be rebuilt. SECTION 2: The findings for MORA 19-028, in accordance with Section 17.52.010 of the PMC (Purpose of Development Review), are made as follows: A. The project has been designed to be architecturally compatible with surrounding residential development, to minimize landform alteration, and conform to City zoning, development and grading standards except for the front yard setbacks for which a Variance can be supported. The project respects and recognizes the interdependence of land values and aesthetics to the benefit of the City. The construction of the addition in the front is where a courtyard currently partially exists, and it will be no closer to the Avenida La Valencia than the existing attached garage. The existing landscaping on each side of the house will be preserved. B. The project has been designed to minimize impacts on surrounding residential development by utilizing earth-tone colored exterior building materials and architectural design that is compatible with surrounding development. The proposed development respects the public concerns for the aesthetics of development and encourages the orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and property within the City. 4 of 13 ATTACHMENT A November 19, 2019, Item #3.1 Resolution No. P-19- Page 2 C. The granting of the MORA would not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare within the community because the addition will not be constructed closer to Avenida La Valencia than the existing residence. D. The project has been designed to be consistent with development in the surrounding residential area by utilizing exterior building materials that are compatible with nearby residential development. The proposed development respects the public concerns for the aesthetics of development. E. The project will not have an adverse effect on the aesthetics, health and safety, or an architecturally-related impact upon adjoining properties, as the project has been designed to be consistent with development in the surrounding residential area by utilizing exterior building materials that are compatible with nearby residential development. F. The design and improvements of the proposed development are consistent with elements of the City of Poway General Plan, and the project conforms to the provisions of the Zoning Code, except for the front yard setback for which a Variance can be supported. SECTION 3: The findings, in accordance with Section 17.50.050 of the PMC, to approve VAR 19-002, are made as follows: A. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property and because of this the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity with the identical zoning classification. Special circumstances include that the existing residence already encroaches into the front yard setback and the addition will observe the same setback as the existing house. Most of the homes in the neighborhood were constructed prior to City's incorporation and developed in accordance with the County of San Diego's development standards. B. Granting the Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right enjoyed by other property owners in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property for which the Variance is sought, in that the location and orientation of the existing home on the property and the floor plan of the existing residence allows a logical addition to the house as proposed since it is not closer than the existing residence. The residence is 49 feet from the paved portion of the public right-of-way. C. Granting the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare of the community in that other homes within the same block observe front yard setbacks that are less than 40 feet. The 27-foot setback from the property line is 49 feet from the edge of pavement. D. Granting the Variance does not constitute a special privilege that is inconsistent with the limitation upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in that this Variance involves the construction of an addition to a single-family residence in a neighborhood where most other residences observe front-yard setbacks that are less than 40 feet. E. Granting the Variance would not allow a use or activity not otherwise expressly authorized by the zoning development regulations governing the property in that additions to a single- family home are allowed and have occurred in the neighborhood. 5 of 13 November 19, 2019, Item #3.1 Resolution No. P-19- Page 3 F. Granting the Variance will be compatible with the City of Poway General Plan because the use is permitted, and the Variance does not result in a density increase, and the addition will be compatible with other residential development in the vicinity and complies with all other requirements of the zone. SECTION 4: The City Council hereby approves MORA 19-028 and VAR 19-002 subject to the following conditions: A. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney's fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit, including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification. In the event of such election, applicant shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney's fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and applicant regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter. However, the applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by applicant. 8. Approval of this Variance shall apply only to the subject project and shall not waive compliance with all other sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. C. Within 30 days of the date of this approval the applicant shall submit in writing that all conditions of approval have been read and understood. D. The conditions of VAR 19-002 shall remain in effect for the life of the subject structure, and shall run with the land and be binding upon future owners, successors, heirs, and transferees of the current property owner. E. VAR 19-002 approves a 27-foot front yard setback for single-story structures only. F. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the applicant shall comply with the following: (Planning) 6 of 13 1. The applicant shall contact the Poway Unified School District at (858) 679-2570 to verify if school impact fees are required. If required, the fees shall be paid at the rate established at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted building codes, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 3. The site shall be developed in accordance with the approved plans on file in the Development Services Department and the conditions contained herein. A final inspection from the appropriate City departments will be required. 4. A building materials color board for the building exterior shall be submitted for November 19, 2019, Item #3.1 Resolution No. P-19- Page 4 review and approval. The building plan shall call out the approved building color and materials. 5. The maximum height of any fence, free standing wall or retaining wall shall not exceed six feet. Any proposed walls shall be decorative block or stucco finish consistent with the exterior of the proposed residence. A general note shall be added to the construction plans identifying the requirement. (Engineering) 6. All spoil materials from footings and foundations shall be legally disposed of off- site or if the material is to remain onsite, the material shall be placed per the requirements of the City grading ordinance. 7. The applicant shall incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) design features into the site development. These shall be clearly shown and identified on the site plan and be appropriately sized for the proposed level of development. 8. The developer shall install and maintain all erosion control devices throughout their intended life. 9. A minimum cash security for erosion control is required. 10. The applicant shall pay the storm water pollution inspection fee according to the latest adopted master fee schedule. 11. The applicant shall pay all applicable development impact fees in effect at time of permit issuance for the proposed accessory dwelling unit. 12. The applicant shall attend a pre-construction meeting at the Department of Development Services. The scheduling request shall be submitted on a City standard form available from the City's project engineer. The applicant's action plan that identifies measures to be implemented during construction to address erosion, sediment and pollution control will be discussed. Compliance for sediment control shall be provided as directed by the project inspector. G. The following requirements shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the Safety Services Department: 7 of 13 1. Approved numbers or addresses measuring four to six inches in height shall be placed on the building in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street fronting the property. Numbers shall contrast with their background. The address is required at the private driveway entrance. 2. Each chimney used in conjunction with any fireplace shall be equipped with an approved spark arrester. 3. Smoke detectors shall be installed in all bedrooms and adjoining hallways. The smoke detectors shall be hard-wired, with a battery backup, and shall be wired in such a manner that if one detector activates, all detectors activate. 4. Carbon monoxide detectors shall be installed in hallways adjoining bedrooms. The November 19, 2019, Item #3.1 Resolution No. P-19- Page 5 carbon monoxide detectors shall be hard-wired, with a battery backup, and shall be wired in such a manner that if one detector activates, all detectors activate. H. Prior to occupancy, or as otherwise noted, the following shall be complied with: 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the approved plans on file in the Development Services Department and the conditions contained herein to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. A final inspection from the appropriate City departments will be required. (Engineering) 2. All proposed utilities or extension of utilities shall be installed underground. No extension of overhead utilities shall be permitted. 3. The drainage facilities, driveway, and all utility services shall be installed and completed by the property owner, and inspected and approved by the Engineering Inspector. All new utility services shall be placed underground. 4. An adequate drainage system shall be provided around the new building pads capable of handling and disposing all surface water to the satisfaction of the Engineering Inspector. 5. The applicant shall repair, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, any and all damage to public improvements caused by construction activity from this project. (Planning) 6. Landscaping shall be installed per the approved landscape plan and submittal of an irrigation audit report, pursuant to Section 17.41.110 of the PMC. SECTION 5: The approval of MORA 19-028 and VAR 19-002 shall expire on November 19, 2021, at 5:00 p.m., unless prior to that time a Building Permit has been issued and construction has commenced on the property. SECTION 6: The parties are hereby informed that the time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. 8 of 13 November 19, 2019, Item #3.1 Resolution No. P-19- Page 6 PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Poway, California, on the 19th day of November, 2019 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DISQUALIFIED: Steve Vaus, Mayor ATTEST: Faviola Medina, CMC, City Clerk 9 of 13 November 19, 2019, Item #3.1 0 75 150 --300 Feet --- 10 of 13 CITY OF POWAY Zoning I Location Map oca 10n: ida La Valenci 75-620-17 Item: MDRA19-028 and VAR19-002 ATTACHMENT B November 19, 2019, Item #3.1~ ...I,~ ...I, STO~ QR<lr,.:NAGE STI:NCIL.JNG OF SIG~E PROTECT Oi.rrDOOR HA.TERI.AL 5-0R,Ar,,Ge A~ RlOM ~NF.AW.., RUN-ON, ~UN-OFF, AND \.\11ND DISPERS.A.L 0 =1ROTECT HA.TI:~ STORED IN OIJTDOOI< WORK ARE.AS FROM lc.AJNFA:...L, RUN-0~. RUN-OFF AND \VIND DISPERS,A.l. ..... ~ ...I, c..,CK§ PROc.Ci TRASH ARE.AS FRO!'-" RAINFALL, RUN-ON, ~D R:JN-OFF, AND \.\11ND DISPERSAi.. ADDmON,O>J.. 6MP-S BASED ON POTENTIAL SOURCES o== ~ 01"-1-SITE STORM DR,.2,,JN INLi:::"S (!I !NTE!<JOR Fi.-OOI< DRAINS ( EL.~ATOR SHAr" PUMPS ~ INTI:RJOR PAQIC;JNG G.A:V..SES [QJ N!::ED FOR F:.JT~ 1,DOOR. !. STR. PSST CON~L (!] 1...A>NDSC-,,1.PE / OIJTDOO~ PESTICIDE USE [EJ POOL..5, SPAS, PONDS. l=OUNTAJN$ E WATER FEATIJl<ES @ FOOD SERvCE (E] TR.ASH OR REFUSE ~ QJ 1"'-DJS~ PROCESSES QJ Olf."DOOI< STOl<.A.GE OF EQUIPMENT OR MATERLA.i...5 (Kl -...,i::_HICLE EQUIPMENT Cl...S..A,NING (g VEl-t1CI..EIE:QU1PMENT REPAIR AND "'1.Al"JTENANCE (Bl FJEL DISPENSU'-..G ~ [BJ !-OADING DOCKS @I FIRE S~NK...E~ l:;.ST ~ MISCE:.U.A."-,iE::OUS DR.A.IN 0~ W,O,.SH WATER @I PLAZAS, SIDE\VALKS. Dl<JVEWAYS, AND PAAl'-JNG i..OTS ~ MAlNT~N t-..ATURAJ... Dlc.AJNAGE PATHWAYS AND HYDl<OL.OGIC FE.A.TURES ~ CONSER\IE NATURA.I.. ARE.AS, 5011...5, AND VEG!:ATION ~ :-"'lll"-IIMIZE !MPER:\IIOUS ARE.AS ~ ~INIMIZE 5011...5 co-iPACTlON ~ ,MPERVIOUS ~ DISPERSION ~ RJNOFF COL::CT10N ~ L...ANDse,.,,.piNG \.Vril·• N.A."i'7V'E QR DROUGHT )> TOLE~ SPEQES --1 ~ ~TING ~DUSING PRECIPITATION ~ ------,MPEIM--OU-S-,.,..,._-""'5-T""W-11N<,_CA_"!70_N ____ , __ T01'.-Al-•--u•~ 0 1---------+-'" .. _~_ccou_s+-,:::'°""5""-~_"_•-+-·-,---AAEA•~•·~,,..~--l :I: S'T'RUCnJRE~N"T' 3,012SF 3.9635F s: ~~~AY 1;: m l-"--'-'='------+--"S,1c=c7'-=-SF--+----+-----'-=--i z -I 0 AVENI DA LA VALENCIA --'<------~ _=_R~_0_:_IO_N_C_O_N_TR_O_L_P_LA_N_(_B_M_P_P_LA_N_) ___ $-AVENI DA LA VALENCIA OJ EXISTING ONE STORY SINGL..E FAMILY lc.ESIDENCE @J EXISTING 3 CA.R GAR.AGE W PROPOSED ADDmON 0 PROPOSED couRTY,A.RD ~ COVERED Ef\.mlY PO~rl @J PROPOSED COVERED PATIO [TI EXJSTING CU"8 ( NO SlDEWALK) ~ PROPOSED €i-G FENCE W/ GATE ~ E:.XISilNG l-'\AR0.5CA.PE TO REl"1AlN ~ EXISTING LANDSCAPE: TO RE,M,A.!N SITE PLAN 1":20-0 SHEET INDEX .:..-1 SITE PLAN A-:2 E.XISTING FLOOR PLA.N _.0,3 Pl<OPOSED FLOOR ROOF PLAN A-4 BUILDING EL.EVA.TJONS VICINITY MAP DESIGNER SCOPE OF WOl<K ASSESSORS NO. LEGA.L DESCRIPTION cOTAREA CONSTRUCTION OCCUPA.NCIE:.S BUILDING .AREAS GARAGE TOTAL ANDREA DANGIO 13:205 AVENIDA LA VALENCIA PO,.NAY,CA.92064-0SCAA ZAZUETA rm FIFTH AVENUE SAN ::>1EGO, CA 92101 T.619302..3857 REMODEL. ,D>.NO .A.DDmON TO EXISTING ONE STO~ SINGLE F,A.l'11L Y DVv'EWNG, COMPRISED OF, RE~DEL ~Te:R BE~OM CLOSET TWO NEW 6EDROOMS WI B.ATHS .al.ND WA.L.K IN CLOSETS 27S-620-T1-00 L.0T 163, MAP 7:!i..7S SILVER SADDLE !<,A.NO• AA-C 29,9S8 SF (0.550 ACRES) TYPE V-B, NON--SPR.INl<.L.ERED EXISTING 644SF 644SF 2.368SF 951 SF 3.319SF 3,012SF 951 SF 3.963 SF L.0T COVER.AGE: 1396 PROPOSED I 3596 ALLO\.VED FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES APt='l<OVED NIJM6ERS OR ,.:t..DDRESSE:.S MEASUl<JNG 4 .,.0 6 INCHES IN 1-!EIGHT SHA.L.L. BE Pt...ACE.5 ON THE 6UILOING IN SUCH A POSITION .AS TO BE: Pl...AJNL. Y VISIBLE ,D>.NO LEGIBLE FROM THE STI<EeT FRONilNG THE PROPEl<N'. NUMBERS SHALL CON'T"RA6T \MT'-! THEIR BACKGROUND. THE ADDRESS IS REQUIRED AT THE=: PRI\IATe: D~'EWAY ENTRANCE. SMOKE DETEcrORS SI-\.AJ..L BE INST.ALL.ED IN AW.. BEDROOMS ,D>.NO ADJOINING HA.Li.WAYS. THE SMOKE DETECTORS SI-\.AJ..L BE HARD WIRED, \1/rT'H A S,a,,TTEl<Y BACKUP, A.ND SH.ALL SE WIRED IN SUCH A ~NER THAT I!= ONE DETECTOR .A.CTIVATES, .AJ...L DETEcr~ AC!'VATe:. CAJ<BON MONOXIDE DETECTORS SHALL BE INSTALL.ED IN HALL.WAYS .AOJOtNING BEDROOMS. THE CA.RSON MONOXIDE D~-CTORS SHALL BE HA.RD WlrcED, \1/rT'H A SA.TIE~ BACK.UP, ,D>.NO SHALL BE WIRED IN SUCH A MANNER TH.AT IF ONE DETEcrOR ACT!v.ATES, AW.. DETECTORS ACTNATe:. EACH CI-IIMNEY USED IN CONJUNCTION WrTH ANY FIREPI...ACE=: SI-\.AJ..L BE EQUIP"ED \VTTH ,D>.N APt='l<OVED SPARK ~TER cc ,c( ...J z 0 V) w 0 i:, Cl N z < 0 z r:; In 0 ::;:; -~ z 0 j::: ~...,. 0 u -0 0 zO wN < ...J 0-w~~ u ::5 ~ Z<o w O LL. 0 -::i -z< V) w u w > ' °' <( ~ 0 ~~ <.!) NQ C") Cl.. z < 0 RECEIVED SEPJ,20\9 COVEi< 5,-,EET! SrTE Pl.AN A-1 November 19, 2019, Item #3.1)> -I -I )> 0 :I: s:: m z -I CJ _______ 77_-0' __ 17~_· ---~,.._-----~•7_-4_' ------"-"3~·-:r=---II II II II II II II ------ - ------------JL ____ ---- -(E) 3CARGAR-"GE (E) FAMILY l<O0M (E) KITCHEN ill (E) LIVINGlaO0M (E) DINING ®' -,f------______________ _.__,77__.,-0,_· ---~ -----PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN 3116":1'--0 -------------,.. 1i l [] 4• DRYER VENT ,ALONG CEIUNG JOISTS ""80VE., 14'-0 M.lv\. LENGTH W/ :;! BENDS .A',NO SACKDRAFT DAMPER. @J EXISTING 30 G,-,..i..L.QN WATER HEATER TO ~MA.IN 0 3-0" DEEP x ::>OOI< WIOTH MN. C0!'.ClcE:TE L.AN0ING, W/ i1.::.: MAXSLQPE. 0 SHELF ~0 POLE VElclFY \VI OWNER, TYPICAL-AT ALJ... CLOSETS m FREEST.ANDING TUB. \/Elc.lFY "1ANUF.-l>.C11.IR.ER SPEc1:::1CAT1CNS Pl<JOR TO PLUMBING ~UGH 1N @J SH°'-VER WI Se,A,.T [z] 6'-0" HT WOOD FRAMED WALL W/ CEMENT PLASTER FINISH ~ ~~1~THl=lOOM CL.EA.RANCES. T"'PICA.L .. ~T ALJ... :§: 110 VOLT DUPLEX OUTL.ET 8 TIO VOLT DUPLEX FLOOR OUTLET FUEL GAS OUTLET HOSE 616 -N~WA.U...W/2,.;4STUDS~16"0.C. ==== EXmNG WALL WI 2 x A. STUDS TO REMAIN r::o <( ...I z (.'.) V) u w 0 Cl Cl 0 N 0 ~ z r:i 0 ~ 0 -z 0 PROPOSED FLOOR~ A-3 November 19, 2019, Item #3.1)> -I -I )> 0 :::c: s: m z -I m PAR77AL. SOUTH ELEVATION @J EXISTING CEMENT P_A.SICI< FINISH [fil CEMENT Pc.ASTISI'< F'NISH .,.0 MATCH e>:STING CO~ li<OOF "'lLE, Cc.ASS 'A' ASSEMSI.Y ~ 0:MENT PL.AS"fER R.CX,lF EA\IE. i:.A\IE W/ WOOD NM TO MATCH EXISTIN& [!) DOOi'! l"cRSCHSDtJ..E II] W1NDOW Peli< SCHSDUl.S ~ DECORATM= VENT @ tEi-0' r!T WOOO FRAMED \V,ALL W; CEMENT PI..ASiEI< FINISH fi'Ql pQ:0JEC11QN OF N5W F,AU WI &-VENT n-t~UC;H ~ [fil 1/Z GY'P 60A~ MIN F1,.15 IIATT INSULATION 6!j R.--30 BATT INSULATION i::QuNDAilON Pe~ S11<UCT\JAA.. ~ FAA/11NG l"cR STl<UC'Tl.JRAl. -■■ a::i < ....I z C> V) w a N ~ z < 0 0 " , NORTH EL.EVA TION EAST ELEVATION 3/16".:1'-0' SECTION A-A 3116':1'-0-el.EVA-CONS SECTION B-B A-4 November 19, 2019, Item #3.2 DATE: TO: FROM: CONTACT: SUBJECT: Summary: City of Poway COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT November 19, 2019 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Counci ,A Robert Manis, Director of Development Services F I Oda Audish , Associate Planner f/t/!A- (858) 668-4661 I oaudish@poway.org Adoption of an Ordinance Amending T itle 17 of the Poway Municipal Code Pertaining to Lighting Standards for Recreational Courts; Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) 19-002 This is a proposed update to the City's current lighting regulations pertaining to recreational courts . The proposed Ordinance will amend Chapter 17.30 of the Poway Municipal Code (PMC) to expand the types of light fixtures allowed for recreational courts to include new energy efficient lighting technology such as light emitting diode (LED) technology. The updated regulations would continue to minimize the potential for negative impacts from lighting to the public and astronomical research at Palomar Observatory. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council take public input ; close the public hearing , introduce the Ordinance for first reading by title only , waive further reading , and schedule adoption of the attached Ordinance for December 3, 2019 . Discussion: Chapter 17.30 of the PMC establishes that the City Council may allow lighting of a recreational court, such as a tennis or basketball court, with the approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP). PMC Section 17.30.020 further establishes various minimum standards for the lighting of the recreational courts to minimize light pollution in a neighborhood. For instance, the light fixtures are restricted to 1,000-watt high-pressure sodium (HPS). This standard was adopted in 1996. Prior to 1996, there were no standards for this type of fixture and most recreational court lighting consisted of meta l halide. In response to numerous lighting complaints from residents , the City Council established 1,000-watt HPS lighting as the new standard as it has a warmer color , and much less light spillage and halo effect than metal halide of equal wattage. Since 1996 advances in lighting technology have been made resulting in the development of energy efficient lighting alternatives such as LED lighting . Over the past few years , the overall use of HPS lighting has greatly diminished and although it is still available for purchase, it is often a special order. Some residents have inquired about the use of LED lighting for recreational courts. Unlike the orange light that HPS produces, LED light fixtures are a cooler, white light under which it is easier to see true colors . The use of LED lights will sa ve energy, extend the life span for fixtures, and reduce maintenance . 1 of 6 November 19, 2019, Item #3.2 Staff has been in contact with lighting s uppliers to find LED lighting standards that would be a suitable alternative t o the 100 0-watt HPS light. Staff has learned that LED lighting which does not exceed a Correlated Color Temperature (CCT) of 3,000-Kelvin would be appropriate for illuminati ng sports courts and also similar in the color of a 1,000-watt HPS light ing fixture. T he 3 ,000-Kelvin standard is considered to be "war m-white" or "filtered LED" l ight that m inimizes blue emission and would be consistent with the recently adopted City's standard for street lights along maj or arterial and collecto r streets. The brightness would continue to be regulated t o not e xceed one-half foot-candle above ambient light levels at t he property lines. Staff has also reviewed standards set forth by the International Dark Sky Association (IDA), which is the organ ization that Palomar Observatory has d irected staff to contact in regard to developing lighting standards that also preserve the night sky. The PMC light ing level standards for recreational courts are consistent with t he IDA Model Ordinance's special use requirements for sport courts, although the IDA acknowledges that no sport court lights are capable of meeting their generally preferred lighting levels for dark sky. It should also be noted that the additional lighting level d oes not last the entire night because the PMC only allows the lighting of recreational court light ing between 7 a.m . and 10 p .m. The updated regu lations would provide energy efficient opt ions for lighting of recreational courts in addition to the existing 1,000-watt HPS lighting while continuing to avoid light spill-over onto adjacent p roperties and minimize glare, upward light and artificial sky glow in the neighborhood. Recreational court lights shall continue to be subject t o all other existing PMC standards which include installing shields on the light fixtures , adj usting the fixtu res and City Council approval of an MCUP. Envi ronmental Review: T his Ordinance is exempt from the provIsIons of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pur suant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines because th is is an or dinance intended to allow t he replacement of HPS light fixtu res with LED fixtures at an equiv alent or reduced color temperature and brightness for recreationa l court lighting and do not result in additional light sources or expansion of the existing use. Fiscal Impact: None. Pu blic Notif ication: A notice of Public Heari ng was published in the Poway News Chieftain on Thursday, November 7 , 2019. Attac hme nts: A. Ordinance amending Title 17 of the Poway Munici pal Code. Reviewed/Approved By: Assistant City Manager 2 o f 6 Reviewed By: Alan Fenstermacher City Attorney Approved By: ChfUk?. City Manager November 19, 2019, Item #3.2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17 CHAPTER 17.30 OF THE POWAY MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO LIGHTING OF RECREATIONAL COURTS (ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 19-002) WHEREAS, Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) 19-002 is a request to modify existing standards for lighting of recreational courts to include new energy efficient lighting technology, such as light emitting diode (LED) technology, of a similar color temperature to the currently allowed 1000-watt high-pressure sodium (HPS) lights; WHEREAS, LED has two to four times as long of a lifespan as most fluorescent, metal halide, and even sodium vapor lights; LED consumes very low amounts of energy; LED emits almost no forward heat for improved safety; LED is able to operate at virtually any percentage of their rated power (0 to 100 percent); LED does not contain mercury internal to the bulb and does not require hazardous waste disposal; and LED is available in a variety of color temperatures; WHEREAS, the recreational lighting regulations contained in the Poway Municipal Code (PMC) have not been evaluated since 1996 and are in need of an update to reflect current lighting technology; WHEREAS, the City Council seeks to regulate the color temperature of lights within the City and desires to adopt standards for new energy efficient lighting technology; WHEREAS, the City Council continues to support a lighting design of recreational courts that provides for utility while conserving energy and resources and minimizes light spill-over, glare, and sky glow for the benefit of the public and astronomical research at Palomar Observatory; WHEREAS, on November 19, 2019, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing to solicit comments from the public, both for and against, ZOA 19-002; and WHEREAS, the City Council has read and considered the agenda report for the proposed project and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitations are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby approves ZOA 19-002 and amends certain sections of the PMC as specified below. Removals are indicated with strikethroughs and additions are indicated with underline. SECTION 3: This Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines because this is an ordinance intended to update City regulations for recreational court lighting, which are similar to existing regulations and do not result in additional light sources or expansion of the existing use. 3 of 6 ATTACHMENT A November 19, 2019, Item #3.2 Ordinance No. 19- Page 2 SECTION 4: Chapter 17.30 of the PMC shall be amended as follows [entire Chapter is shown]: 17.30.010 Generally. The following regulations are established for the construction of recreational courts including but not limited to tennis, paddle tennis and other similar uses. A. Unlighted private recreational courts may be permitted as an accessory use in single-family zones, subject to the standards contained in PMC 17.30.020 and to the approval of a minor development review by the Director of Development Services. B. Private recreational courts with exterior lighting may be permitted as an accessory use in single-family zones subject to the approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit and to required findings by the City Council in accordance with PMC 17 .48. 070. C. Private recreational courts, lighted or unlighted, may be permitted as an accessory use in multifamily zones subject to the approval of a development review by the City Council. D. Public or semipublic recreational courts may be approved in any zone subject to the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit and to required findings by the City Council in accordance with PMC 17.48.070. E. The terms used in this chapter. shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them in PMC Section 13.15.020. 17.30.020 Minimum standards required. Recreational courts shall meet the following minimum standards: A. A maximum 10-foot-high fence (measured from the finished grade of the court) shall be allowed for private courts and a maximum 12-foot-high fence shall be allowed for commercial and public courts. B. Setbacks for the court shall be: 1. Side yard, 10 feet; 2. Rear yard, 10 feet; C. Maximum of eight lights permitted, height not to exceed 18 feet. All lights and light fixtures shall be certified by the installation contractor to: 1. Be designed, constructed, mounted and maintained such that the light source is cut off when viewed from any point above five feet measured at 1 O feet from the edge of the court; 2. Be designed, constructed, mounted light shields installed and maintained such that the maximum illumination intensity measured at the property line shall not exceed one-half foot- candle above ambient light levels; 3. Be used only between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. D. The surface area of any recreational court shall be designed, painted, colored and/or textured to reduce the reflection from any light incident thereon. 4 of 6 November 19, 2019, Item #3.2 Ordinance No. 19- Page 3 E. The fencing, support posts, light poles and fixtures shall be painted a dark nonreflective color so as to reduce their overall visibility. Vinyl-coated chain link fencing with fence and light poles painted to match is acceptable. F. Landscaping shall be installed between the fence and property line. It shall include fast-growing evergreen canopy type trees, planted one each adjacent to light poles so as to obscure views of the pole and light from neighboring properties. Dense screening planting is required to be installed in the setback area adjacent to the outside of the court fencing, to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services. G. Light fixtures are restricted to 1,000-watt high-pressure sodium, narrow spectrum amber Light Emitting Diode {LED) which does not exceed a Correlated Color Temperature (CCT) of 3,000 Kelvin or other similar directional energy efficient light. H. The City Council or Director of Development Services may require more stringent standards than the above in cases where extraordinary site conditions necessitate. Lighting shall comply with guidelines outlined in the Poway Subarea Habitat Conservation Plan and subsequent amendments. I. All outdoor light fixtures shall be equipped with photocell devices so that such lighting is turned off during daylight hours as much as practical. J. In order to preserve the night sky, the types, locations and controlling devices of outdoor light fixtures shall minimize glare, upward light, artificial sky glow, and light pollution and light trespass {spill-over) onto adjacent properties. External visors and/or internal louvers shall be used to reduce spill light, light trespass, sky glow, and glare impacts to the maximum extent feasible especially onto adjacent properties and adjacent sensitive habitats. SECTION 5: This Ordinance shall be codified. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after its adoption. CERTIFICATION/PUBLICATION: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it or a summary of it, to be published with the names of the City Council members voting for and against the same in the Poway News Chieftain, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Poway within fifteen (15) days after its adoption and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance in the Office of the City Clerk in accordance with Government Code § 36933. 5 of 6 November 19, 2019, Item #3.2 Ordinance No. 19- Page 4 INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Poway, California, held the 19th day of November, 2019, and thereafter PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held the 3rd day of December, 2019, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DISQUALIFIED: Steve Vaus, Mayor ATTEST: Faviola Medina, CMC, City Clerk 6 of6 DATE: TO: FROM: CONTACT: SUBJECT: Summary: City of Poway COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT November 19, 2019 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Councj.A/\ Robert Manis, Director of Development Services T� \I Oda Audish, Associate Planner t)� (858)668-4661 I oaudish@poway.org Tentative Parcel Map 19-002; a request for approval of a second one-year time extension for a previously approved subdivision The City Council's approval of Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) 08-002, known as the Knox Lot Split project, and subsequent extension request (TPM 18-001) was set to expire on November 1, 2019. Prior to the expiration date, the applicant requested a second one-year time extension to allow for additional time to complete the processing requirements for a Final Map. This project will be deemed expired unless the requested time extension is approved. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Resolution. Discussion: The project site is a 2.2-acre property located at 12251 Sunwood Trail, in the Rural Residential C (RR-C) zone. The project location and zoning map is included as Attachment B. The project site currently contains one single-family residence. On November 1, 2016, the City Council approved TPM 08-002, a two-lot residential subdivision of the project site (Attachment C) and Resolution P-16-27. The northerly of the two proposed lots would contain the existing residence. TPM 08-002 was approved by the City Council for two years pursuant to the Poway Municipal Code (PMC), and within that time the applicant is required to process and receive approval of a Final Map from the City Council. The expiration date was incrementally extended to November 1, 2019 as a result of a one-year time extension granted by the City Council under the provisions of Section 16.10.080 of the PMC (TPM 18-001 ). The PMC allows for a total of five one-year time extensions. The application for this time extension was submitted prior to the expiration date of the application and therefore the time extension can still be granted. The applicant needs additional time to complete the Final Map process. The applicant is requesting City Council approval of a second one-year extension. All the findings and Conditions of Approval from City Council Resolution P-16-27 will remain in full force and effect. The project will be required to comply with all current regulations for landscaping and stormwater requirements. No new Conditions of Approval are recommended as this is only a time extension request. With approval of this extension request, the TPM approval will be extended to November 1, 2020. 1 of 6 November 19, 2019, Item #3.3 Environmental Review: This time extension is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines in that this action has no possibility of an effect on the environment. Environmental review was conducted pursuant to CEQA in conjunction with the original approval of the project. Fiscal Impact: None Public Notification: A notice of Public Hearing was published in the Poway News Chieftain on Thursday, November 7, 2019 and mailed to property owners and occupants located within 500 feet of the project site. Attachments: A.Resolution B.Zoning and Location Map C.Currently Approved TTM Reviewed/Approved By: Assistant City Manager 2 of 6 Reviewed By: Alan Fenstermacher City Attorney Approved By: c� City Manager November 19, 2019, Item #3.3 November 19, 2019, Item #3.3 RESOLUTION NO. P-19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19-002; A SECOND ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF THE APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 08-002 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (APN): 317-200-26 WHEREAS, on November 1, 2016, the City Council approved Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) 08-002, for a two-lot subdivision of an approximately 2.2-acre property located at 12251 Sunwood Trail in the Rural Residential C (RR-C) zone; WHEREAS, on November 7, 2018 the City Council approved TPM 18-001, under the provisions of Section 16.10.080 of the Poway Municipal Code (PMC), which resulted in a one- year time extension extending the expiration date of the Tentative Parcel Map to November 1, 2019; WHEREAS, Bill Yen, Inc., (Applicant), on behalf of DKK Family Trust 03-21-04, (Property Owner) has submitted a request (TPM 19-002) pursuant to Section 16.10.080 of the PMC for a second one-year extension of the project approval which automatically extends the expiration date by 60 days, to January 1, 2020 (Government Code 66452.6(e)); and WHEREAS, on November 19, 2019, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing to solicit comments from the public, both for and against, relative to this application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Poway as follows: SECTION 1: This time extension is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines in that this action has no possibility of an effect on the environment. Environmental review was conducted pursuant to CEQA in conjunction with the original approval of the project. SECTION 2: City Council Resolution P-16-27 remains in full force and effect except that a time extension for the approval is hereby granted by the City Council. The time extension for approval shall be for one year from November 1, 2019 to November 1, 2020. SECTION 3: The parties are hereby informed that the time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. 3 of 6 ATTACHMENT A November 19, 2019, Item #3.3 Resolution No. P-19- Page 2 PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Poway, California on the 19th day of November 2019 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DISQUALIFIED: Steve Vaus, Mayor ATTEST: Faviola Medina, CMC, City Clerk 4 of 6 November 19, 2019, Item #3.3 N $ 0 87.5 175 --350 Feet --- 5 of 6 RS-1 CITY OF POWAY Zoning / Location Map Item: TPM 19-002 ATTACHMENT B en 0 en )> -t -t )> (") ::I: s: m z -t (') CITY OF POWAY TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 08-02 40' ACCESS AND �TIUTIES EASEMENT • FUEL MANAGEMENT 110 ��N, KEEP CLEAR 11 O' FUEL MANAGEMENT ZON, KEEP CL.EAR ..40' ACCESS AND lJTILITIES EASEMENT 20' PROPOSED ,oru•-:1 n � ZON, KEEP ri�i •'-._ S - ~ ,_ ,.,;m "" '•\ Fill SLOPE --�/l 'L-�-=OAO,Meeo,eMem :::.- • ayB. / "' SECTION A-A R '-----.. 0)-¾e � �i-1 HOULD IMPERVIOUS /IC, OR CONCRETE PAVING \_ -EXISTING SURFACE SECTION B-B: ROAD IMPROVEMENT 2,1 cJr OR �rJ�� \. • • �� \ PJ'o'>O' ',\ . ··,. .,, /.);-��" 0)-�I '";1l· /- ' ,si / . ,. 0''·\···• ·•. -< .... \XS;, gf�(;f�/ �\L _,,,. ;-, . '. ,. "i ' . . . J ' • - 0'', y . ' . . . \ ,�·_,.,,___. POLLUTANT GENERATING AREAS 47,610 SQ.FT. 19,670 SQ.FT. POU.UTANT GENERATING AREA (INCLUDES GRADING, PAVING, BUIOING AND ZONE A) EXISTING BACKGROUND L£\'EL AREA LEGEND: ---� Y:::::CY ::r::::r:::r: PROPER'TY LINE 27,940 SQ.FT. TOTAL POLLUTANT GENERATING AREA GREATER THAN BACKGROUND LEVELS 480.20 s;\i."-: .. . ;,, ,'✓, '· • • • "' \ ( I ,, '',\,;_•,.-_� e:•.•. �&•·--. \ 0(;/ ✓ \\' '" .. � ,. \ \ ' " . . '" . • . • •, �=· ,,, '\ \ , ' 'a.,J.l4,K ¢ ,., � , • � . ✓\ \:t(, \ EXISTING BUILDING LINES \. , POST'.\ '-,{<' ·O'.'�-.. '. · -�, / ' EX�•ANCt(OR - /"' � -- '\ r...;...,.-._.,�, • -('. =; , 'I> \ � _,._,_ �• .· =• \-v..�_\',, '_..\��Joi \\ \ -W==: EXISTING WAlERUNE ····",, /-. \'' � -. °"_-_-"',�,... • • ,,,. v \\ x,., I - �(j \ ... ;,, ... ·\ ,,,, '\"-\ I -r---.i;\¥_._ •"'. . / _., ·v \ /"F-1' -----+-- . \·.· ,,.. -�" '""' , ....._ ________ -l_ _L_ __ '¥ \•\·. 1-:� .. • •�m <, o' /� _J_____�---=---===-w�s-= TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA OF PAVING AND ROOFTOP 2,no SQ.FT. 6,050 SQ.FT. IMPERVIOUS PAVING ROOFTOP (PROPOSED AND EXISTING) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA POST DEVELOPMENT MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK FRONT YARD: ,W' SIDE YARD: 20' REAR YAAD: 50' _____. c::::===i c:==:J 316-071-07 \., \='•�• ... ,t:/ SEEDET� • . • -,,,__rw •=, _ • �=---.,,/ • . •• < --.-.. ,'-' ... 1",r.. I r ,_ r§f,( / / "''""'""'•· • ON SH�ef i-, �r---s.:.. ___ w-ss ___ 1/Y1 i .- ,.n• , , .. ,.,"'. ·, ;,, �,, t ) - / ):'' :. 07i-12. � .... ��-".�� . »>,)"�'�,/-/ ·.' .. ', ,� I l I l l�} ! .· if I � / 1/1 .-.. , 1/_, :..,;,...,_�- ' =u .. -0/YI/ '. .. --L WATERLINE (; .,, ' '· ='°"'i:a'-.= I ' -1. • . ' -' 'm:\,- I' I ,, ((,,. / '\ - ', --..:.:--1;1/ r ';:,:,. i , . �o1/; \ . p_;,�jD r;,i,,�� ' ,,/�'llJ'f-i'�t{��!! '!;"i ,·?·•: Il�r�� ·. •--� . . 2�;{-:�.:,�,��'Lli,1/>r:�'$ � 1 / / L � -... , ,· ,\ li,\. --, ,, , , is � I ,,....---'I --.. -,, , ",,:,,, .,;y;,L �.. , . -<'v \·11 1 INCH =, 31 ��?�\!°�M�061 BTPM2013.DWG SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS LEGAL DESCRIPTION PORTION OF PARCEL "A" OF PARCEL MAP 13724, IN THE CITY OF POWAY, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,, ALEO IN 11-IE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO OOUNTY ON MARCH 21, 1985 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 23.. IN TOWNSHIP 1-4 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. GENERAL NOTES GROSS AREA: 97,101.93 FT. SQ. -2.23 ACRES NET AREA: 97,101.93 FT SO -2.23 ACRES EXISTING ZONING: RR-C PROPOSED ZONING: RR-C P<MAY COMMUNITY PLAN DESIGNATION: RESIDENTIAL RURAL TOTAL NO. OF PARCELS: 2 RESDENTIAL. THERE ARE NO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ACT PROCEEDINGS PROPOSED. PARK FEES WIU BE PAID IN LIEU OF DEDICATION. IMPROVEMENT, EASEMENTS, EROSION CONTROL. ANO DEDICATION AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. LAND USE SHAU CONFORM TO RR-C ZONING. MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE IS 1 ACRE (NET). FINISH GRADES ANO DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE NOT EXACT ANO ARE SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION IN THE FINAL DESIGN. THIS IS A SOLAR SUBDIVISION AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 81.-40 (N) SUBDMSION ORDINANCE. ALL PARCELS HAVE AT LEAST 100 SQ. FT. OF UNDISTURBED ACCESS TO SUNLIGHT ON THE BUILDABLE PORTION OF THE PARCEL UTILITIES: SEWER: CITY OF P<:NIAY WATER: C11Y OF POWAY GAS cir: ELECTRIC: SAN DIEGO GAS &: ELECTRIC 1IlEPHONE: SBC FIRE PROTECTION: CITY OF P<Y#AY SCHOOLS: POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 317-200-26 TOPOGRAPHY INFORMATION MORENO AERIAL PHOTO SURVEY ON 12-19-00 EXISTING EASEMENTS D0#1 ROAD ANO UTILITY PURPOSES PER INSTRUMENT NO. 1090-47. OF OFFlClAI.. RECORDS, REC. 06-21-1963. 0Df2 EQUESTR1AN TRAIL AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 86-165952, OF OFFlCIAL RECORDS, REC. 04-29-1986. 00#3 PUBLIC UTILITIES ANO INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 86-3756-40, OF OFFlCIAL RECORDS, REC. 8-28-86. 00#4 WATERLINE AND INCIDENTAL. PURPOSES, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 90-610187, OF OFFlCIAL RECORDS, REC. 11-09-90. DD#5 SEWER LINE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 1991-333612, OF OFFlCIAL RECORDS, REC. 07-08-1991. PREPARED FOR DONALD KNOX 12251 SUNWOODTRA.IL POWAY.CA92064 PHONE: (619)794-1227 PREPARED BY: VICINITY MAP ) ,.�11 BILL YEN & ASSOCIATES, INC OD \.I CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING SITE PLA�NING !307\ POWAYROAD,POWAY.CA9206-l-l519 (858)679-8010 FAX(858)679-8015 Will.JAM 't'EN, RCE 33730 DATE W00618 November 19, 2019, Item #3.3- '\' ,, .'. \ :,'-:' ', ~~-• ,,..,.r-·. I leof'EEI"'· t t,\> "'-. -~ \'.t \ ~:~ 01E \ t"~} \, 20' PROPOSED .• ~.......--'-~-~ ✓ ·~ ' . ' 'l,."\I ~\ . \' ,'\> ~~~ \ 1 i \ A\, . . , "-..,. D-1-~e, / -.._________~---- :~ 10' FUEL WANAGEMENT 20N, KEEP CLEAR ,· -485-PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED 2:1 CUT PROPOSED 2: 1 FllL PffC!f>OSEO SPOT EUV,t.,TION PROPOSED FLOW DIRECTION PROPOSED II.IPERVIOUS PAYlNG PROPOSED REf~NING WALLS PROPOSED SEWER FORCE WJN PROPOSED PERVIOUS PAVINC EXISTING lcASEMOO EXISTING COl'lTOUR EXISTING SE'!ER FORCE MAIN PROPOSED LOT UNE PROPOSED FUEL ZONE PROPOSED ~YUGHT PROPOSED F1RE H'rnfWf'l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ovember 19, 2019, Item #5.1 2 of 42 At the workshop on October 15, 2019, after comments by the public and City Council discussion, the City Council: 1.Selected two options each for water and wastewater for further discussion, 2.Directed staff to adjust the proposed reserve levels from 180-days of operating expenditures to 120-days, and 3.Directed staff to provide rate payers with a bill estimator tool for the four options being considered at the second workshop. The options Council selected for further discussion at the workshop tonight were Option 2b and 2c for water and Option 2b and 2c for wastewater. Further, the proposed target reserve levels for water and wastewater have been adjusted to 120-days of operating expenditures. This staff report summarizes these four options and show the impacts of the updated reserve targets for consideration by the City Council and public input. Additionally, based on feedback from the public, Council directed staff to create a bill estimator for the water and wastewater options. This bill estimator would give the public an opportunity to evaluate the rate structures under consideration at tonight’s workshop by modeling the impacts associated with their specific usage. Staff posted the bill estimator to the City’s website on October 22, 2019. To notify residents this tool was available to them, the Community Outreach Coordinator notified residents through the City's Nextdoor public agency account, its City of Poway Facebook page and the Poway Today e-newsletter. The information was also posted on the homepage of the City's website. As of November 8th, 138 people downloaded this tool. There are approximately 13,900 water customers and approximately 12,100 wastewater customers. Water Residential Rate Payer Class Rate Design Options Raftelis Financial Consultants (RFC), who was hired to conduct the Cost of Service Study, developed several rate design options for the residential rate payer class. The two options selected by Council at the first workshop for further discussion tonight are shown below. Option Residential Tiers Fixed (%) Variable (%) 2b 3 20% 80% 2c 3 25% 75% A three-tier residential structure was selected because it provides an equitable balance between affordability and sustainability. Within the three-tier structure, the options which recovered more revenue via fixed charges were selected for consideration at the second workshop due to the importance of the fixed/variable ratio in revenue stability and system sustainability. As discussed during the first workshop, the amount of water expenses which are fixed does not align with the amount of revenue collected via fixed charges. Over 50 percent of water’s expenses are fixed while only 16 percent of its revenue is derived from fixed charges. This disparity makes the water system more susceptible to changes in rate payer usage which decreases the revenue stability and sustainability of the system. For a more detailed description of these options, structures and how the tier breakpoints were established, please refer to Exhibit A. The remainder of the page, along with several ensuing pages, is intentionally left blank to allow each option its own page to make the comparison between options easier. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 3 of 42 Water Rate Design Option 2b (3-Tier Structure; 20% fixed, 80% variable) In this option, the amount of revenue collected via fixed charges is 20 percent. Tier Tier Breakpoints (Units) % of Water Use % of Bills 1 20 42% 49% 2 56 29% 35% 3 >56 29% 16% Average Usage: 37 units Fixed: 20% Average Summer Usage: 56 units Variable: 80% The chart below shows the bi-monthly impacts across various usage levels for this option. When looking at the bi-monthly impacts to rate payers in a three-tier structure, a fixed charge recapturing 20 percent of water’s fixed costs helps provide an equitable balance between revenue stability, which helps support financial sustainability, and affordability. While a higher fixed charge would provide more revenue stability, increasing the fixed charge all at once instead of incrementally over time increases the impacts to rate payers. This option makes it easier to support conservation during periods of mandated conservation because higher water use is easily discernable through the rate structure tiers (i.e. consumption levels) and pricing. However, there is some risk of demand hardening. Demand hardening is a phenomenon generally described as the reduction in the ability of a rate payer to further reduce demand because the more cost-effective water reductions (e.g. low-flow appliances) have already been implemented. It is believed to occur as a result of long-term conservation measure such as education, water restrictions, rebate programs, and price structure changes (e.g. tiers) which make it harder to induce further water use reductions during drought/mandated conservation periods. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 SFR Impacts at Different Usage Levels: 3/4' Meter; 3-Ti ered; 20%/80% F/V (Opt i on 2b) $1 ,600 $1 ,400 $1,.2 00 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 ■Current Bill ■ Proposed Bill l mpact(S) Impact(%) 10 un · s. S95.SS $103.29 S7.41 7 .7% S149.48 20 units. S149.48 $149.19 -S0.29 -0.2¾ ■- S240.60 3-7 un its S240.60 S240.14 -S0.46 -0.2¾ 1-1-1 $.-342.44 S578.28 $-846.28 56 un its 100 unts. 150 unts. $342.44 S5-78 .28 $846.28 S341.79 S669.59 $1,042.09 -S0.65 S91.31 S195 .81 -0.2¾ 15 .8% B.1% S1,116.57 200 unts. S1,116.5 7 $1,414.59 S298.02 26.7% 4 of 42 Water Rate Design Option 2c (3-Tier Structure; 25% fixed, 75% variable) In this option, the amount of revenue collected via fixed charges is 25 percent. Tier Tier Breakpoints (Units) % of Water Use % of Bills 1 20 42% 49% 2 56 29% 35% 3 >56 29% 16% Average Usage: 37 units Fixed: 25% Average Summer Usage: 56 units Variable: 75% Because fixed charges are increasing, the lowest volume users see an increased bi-monthly impact while the highest volume users see a reduced bi-monthly impact when compared to Option 2b. Low (users falling into the essential water use category) have a moderate bi-monthly impact while average users have a small bi-monthly impact. The chart below shows the bi-monthly impacts across various usage levels for this option. While increasing the revenue collected from fixed charges helps increase the financial sustainability of the utility, it also impacts low volume users more significantly than Option 2b. This option also supports conservation though it could also lead to demand hardening similar to Option 2b. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 SFR Impacts at Di ffe r e nt U sa ge Lev el s: 3 /4' M eter; 3-Ti e red; 25%/7 5% F/V (Op,ti o n 2 c) $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 ■Current Bill ■ Proposed Bill l mpatt(S) Impact(%) 10 un · s. $95.68 $115.62. $19.74 20.6% S149.4S 2.0 units S149.4S $160.12. $10.64 7.1% ■-. $2.40 .60 37 units. $2.40.60 $2.45.46 $4.86 1-1= $342..44 $578.2.8 $846.2.8 56 units. 100 unts 150 unts S.342..44 $578.2.8 $846.2.8 $.340.84 $631.2.4 $961.2.4 -Sl.60 $52..96 $114.96 -0.5% 9.2.% 13.6% Sl,116.57 2.00 unts Sl,116.57 Sl,2.91.2.4 $174.67 15.6% 5 of 42 Water Financial Policies At the first workshop, a minimum reserve of 90 days of operating costs and a target reserve of 180 days of operating costs was recommended. Based on discussions at the meeting, setting a target reserve of 120 days, or four months, was deemed more prudent. This target level would help minimize the impact to ratepayers while still providing mitigation for revenue fluctuations, emergencies such as emergency repairs, droughts, natural disasters, and unforeseen economic influences. The chart below shows what the target reserves for 180 days looked like for reference: The chart below shows what the recommended target reserve of 120 days looks like: Both charts still reflect a capital reserve of 10 percent of net capital assets. For a more detailed description of the financial policies, please refer to Exhibit A. As discussed above, these reserves will help mitigate potential risks, mitigate revenue f luctuations, and smooth rates. They are also important to mitigate emergencies such as emergency repairs, droughts, natural disasters, and unforeseen economic influences. November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 ~ $20 C J $18 :j, $16 $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 $0 ~ $14 C 0 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 so Ope r at ing & Cap ita l Reserves (Wate r) - --- FY E 2020 FY E 2021 FY E 2022 FY E 2023 FY E 2024 -Total Reserves -Minimum Reserve --Target Reserve Operat i ng & Capita l Reserves (Water) ------- FY E 2020 FY E 2021 FY E 2022 FY E 2023 FY E 2024 -Total Reserves -M ini mum Reserve --Target Reserve 6 of 42 Wastewater Residential Rate Payer Class Rate Design Options RFC developed several rate design options for Council consideration and public input. The two options selected by Council at the first workshop for further discussion tonight are shown below: Option Structure Fixed (%) Variable (%) 2b Fixed + Variable 25% 75% 2c Fixed + Variable 30% 70% In the fixed plus variable rate structure, all rate payers are billed a fixed charge, similar to water, and have a variable component tied to their winter water usage. A fixed plus variable structure was selected because it is more equitably tied to people’s wastewater generation and more consistent with current law. Within this structure, the options which recovered more revenue via fixed charges were selected for consideration at the second workshop due to the importance of the fixed/variable ratio in revenue stability and system sustainability. As discussed during the first workshop, the amount of wastewater expenses which are fixed does not align with the amount of revenue collected via fixed charges. Over 50 percent of wastewater’s expenses are fixed while only 20 percent of its revenue is derived from fixed charges. This disparity makes the wastewater system more susceptible to changes in rate payer usage which decreases the revenue stability and sustainability of the system. The chart below shows how this structure visually compares to the current structure. Additional tables have been added to the wastewater options presented on the following pages to make it clearer how the bi-monthly impacts occur at each usage level. For a more detailed description of these options, structures and how the tier breakpoints were established, please refer to Exhibit A. The remainder of the page, along with several ensuing pages, is intentionally left blank to allow each option its own page to make the comparison between options easier. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 $150 5140 5120 SlOO $SO $.50 $.40 $.20 Bi-Monthly S FR Bills (Wastewater) I j ! .....,.currellt I I I _...,. Proposed -New Strutture t I I I I 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 Bi -Month ly W i nter Water Use (un i ts) 7 of 42 Wastewater Rate Design Option 2b (Fixed + variable rate structure; 25% fixed, 75% variable) In this option, the amount of revenue collected via fixed charges is 25 percent. The chart below shows the bi-monthly impacts across various usage levels for this option. The following table shows the bi-monthly impacts at each usage level up to the proposed cap of 24 units. Units Current ($) Proposed ($) Difference ($) Difference (%) 1 50.88 26.88 (24.00) (47.2%) 2 50.88 31.56 (19.32) (38.0%) 3 50.88 36.25 (14.63) (28.8%) 4 50.88 40.94 (9.94) (19.5%) 5 50.88 45.62 (5.26) (10.3%) 6 73.46 50.31 (23.15) (31.5%) 7 73.46 55.00 (18.46) (25.1%) 8 73.46 59.68 (13.78) (18.8%) 9 73.46 64.37 (9.09) (12.4%) 10 73.46 69.06 (4.40) (6.0%) 11 73.46 73.74 0.28 0.4% 12 73.46 78.43 4.97 6.8% 13 99.79 83.12 (16.67) (16.7%) 14 99.79 87.80 (11.99) (12.0%) 15 99.79 92.49 (7.30) (7.3%) 16 99.79 97.18 (2.61) (2.6%) 17 99.79 101.86 2.07 2.1% 18 99.79 106.55 6.76 6.8% 19 99.79 111.24 11.45 11.5% 20 107.33 115.92 8.59 8.0% 21 107.33 120.61 13.28 12.4% 22 107.33 125.30 17.97 16.7% 23 107.33 129.99 22.66 21.1% 24 107.33 134.67 27.34 25.5% November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 SFR Impacts at Differ-ent U.sage L-ev-els: 25%/75% F/V (Optio,n 2b) S160 $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 so ■Current Bill ■ Proposed Bill Impact($) Impact(%) 1-. 5 units $50.88 $45.62 -$5.26 -10.3 % 1-· 12 units 19 units $73.46 $99.79 S78.4:. $111.24 54.97 $11.45 6.8% 11.5% 26 units 37 units 50 units $107.33 $122.36 $137.43 $134.67 S134.67 $134.67 $27.34 $12.2-9 -$2.76 25.5% 10.0% -2.0% 60 un its $148.7:', $134.67 -$14.06 -9.5% 8 of 42 The table on the previous page is useful for demonstrating how the bi-monthly impacts can vary by consumption level. As discussed at the first workshop, this occurs because of how the current tier structure works as compared to the proposed fixed plus variable structure. As discussed at the first workshop, the average residential payer’s wastewater flow is 15 units bi-monthly. As reflected in the table, all usage levels 15 units or under (except two) show a decreased bi-monthly impact. As a result, this option offers good affordability to the lowest volume rate payer while still increasing revenue stability by increasing the amount of revenue collected via fixed charges. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 9 of 42 Wastewater Rate Design Option 2c (Fixed + variable rate structure; 30% fixed, 70% variable) In this option, the amount of revenue collected via fixed charges is 30 percent. The chart below shows the bi-monthly impacts across various usage levels for this option. The following table shows the bi-monthly impacts at each usage level up to the proposed cap of 24 units. Units Current ($) Proposed ($) Difference ($) Difference (%) 1 50.88 31.00 (19.88) (39.1%) 2 50.88 35.38 (15.50) (30.5%) 3 50.88 39.75 (11.13) (21.9%) 4 50.88 44.12 (6.76) (13.3%) 5 50.88 48.50 (2.38) (4.7%) 6 73.46 52.87 (20.59) (28.0%) 7 73.46 57.25 (16.21) (22.1%) 8 73.46 61.62 (11.84) (16.1%) 9 73.46 66.00 (7.46) (10.2%) 10 73.46 70.37 (3.09) (4.2%) 11 73.46 74.74 1.28 1.7% 12 73.46 79.12 5.66 7.7% 13 99.79 83.49 (16.30) (16.3%) 14 99.79 87.87 (11.92) (11.9%) 15 99.79 92.24 (7.55) (7.6%) 16 99.79 96.62 (3.17) (3.2%) 17 99.79 100.99 1.20 1.2% 18 99.79 105.37 5.58 5.6% 19 99.79 109.74 9.95 10.0% 20 107.33 114.11 6.78 6.3% 21 107.33 118.49 11.16 10.4% 22 107.33 122.86 15.53 14.5% 23 107.33 127.24 19.91 18.5% 24 107.33 131.61 24.28 22.6% November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 SFR Impacts at Diff.erent Usage levels: 30%/70% F/V (Option 2c) S160 $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 so ■Current Bill ■ Proposed Bill Impact($) Impact(%) 1-. 5 units $50.88 $48.50 -$2.36 -4.7% 1-· 12 units 19 units $73.46 $99.79 S79.12 $109.74 $5.66 $9.95 7 .7% 10.0% 26 units 37 units 50 units $107.33 $122.36 $137.43 $131.61 S131.61 $131.61 $24.28 $9.23 -$5.62 22.6% 7.5% -4.2% 60 units $148.7:', $131.61 -$17.12 -11.5% 10 of 42 In Option 2c, the lowest volume users still see a reduced bi-monthly impact when compared to the City’s current wastewater structure which helps increase affordability. Almost all users in the middle usage areas see decreased bi-monthly impacts from Option 2b while high volume users see a reduced bi-monthly impact from Option 2b. In other words, low volume users save less while higher volume users pay less under Option 2c, as compared to Option 2b. When looking at the bi-monthly impacts to rate payers across wastewater Option 2b and 2c, a fixed charge recapturing 30 percent of wastewater’s fixed costs helps provide an equitable balance between revenue stability, which helps support financial sustainability, and affordability. Wastewater Financial Policies Similar to water, the current reserve policy for wastewater is to maintain a minimum working capital balance equal to 20 percent of operating expenditures. Consistent with the newly proposed water operating reserve levels, and for the same reasons, the recommended minimum operating reserves are 90 days of operating costs with a target reserve of 120 days. The chart below shows what the target reserves for 180 days looked like for reference: The chart below shows what the recommended target reserve of 120 days looks like: November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 VI $14 C 0 = $12 ~ SlO S14 S12 s10 $8 $6 S4 S2 so SB S6 S4 S2 so Ope r at ing & Cap ita l Reserves (Wastewater ) FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 FYE 2023 FYE 2024 -Total Reserves -M i nimum Reser ve -Target Reserv e Operati ng & Cap ital Reserves (Wastewater) FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 FYE 2023 FYE 2024 -Total Reserves - -Minimum Reserve --Target Reserve 11 of 42 Both charts still reflect a capital reserve of 10 percent of net capital assets. Similar to the discussion during the first workshop, wastewater reserve levels are well in excess of the newly established targets. This was a strategic financial management decision in preparation for San Diego Pure Water. San Diego’s Pure Water project is a multi-year project that is projected to supply one-third of San Diego’s water supply locally by 2035. Funds to help cover Poway’s estimated share of this regional project have slowly been set aside to mitigate impacts to rate payers. As the chart shows, the reserves are going to be drawn down over the near-term to help pay Poway’s share of the Pure Water project. For a more detailed description of the financial policies, please refer to Exhibit A. Similar to water, wastewater reserves will also help mitigate potential risks, mitigate revenue fluctuations, and smooth rates. They are also important to mitigate emergencies such as emergency repairs, droughts, natural disasters, and unforeseen economic influences. Timeline This workshop represents the second step in a proposed two-year rate setting process. The following graphic shows the proposed timeline for the first two-year cycle. Environmental Review: This action is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Fiscal Impact: There is no direct fiscal impact associated with this staff report because it only contains information related to the workshop. However, based on the information contained in this staff report, sufficient revenues to fund operations, investment in capital infrastructure, and appropriate reserve levels will be generated from the recommended water and wastewater revenue increases staff will present to the City Council on January 7, 2020 when it is anticipated the City Council will set the public hearing for rate adoption on March 3, 2020. The proposed revenue increases are independent of what rate design Council ultimately pursues. The revenue increases are determined by the costs to operate the water and wastewater systems while the rate designs deal with how those costs are allocated amongst rate payers. Over the next two-year period, it is estimated approximately $2 million in additional water revenues will be generated while approximately $900 thousand in additional wastewater revenues will be generated. The reasons for the proposed revenue increases will be discussed in greater detail at the January 7, 2020 City Council meeting since the focus of the two workshops was on rate design. Workshop 1: Oct. 15, 2019 Workshop 2: Nov. 19, 2019 Set Public Hearing: Jan. 7, 2020 Mail 218 Notice: By Jan. 17, 2020 Public Hearing: Mar. 3, 2020 Year 1 Rates Effective: Mar. 3, 2020 Year 2 Rates Effective: Jan. 1, 2021 Mail 218 Notice By Jan. 17, 2020 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1• • • • • November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Safe reliable water delivered on demand to an average residential rate payer costs less than nine- tenths of one penny per gallon . Treating the average residential rate payer's wastewater in a safe and reliable fashion also costs less than nine -tenths of one penny per gallon. Public Notification: None. Attachments: A. Water and Wastewater Rate Study and Public Workshop staff report dated Oct. 15, 2019 Reviewed/Approved By: Weny Kaserman Assistant City Manager 12 of 42 Reviewed By: Alan Fenstermacher City Attorney Approved By: Ch~ City Manager October 15, 2019, Item #5.113 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1ATTACHMENT A DATE: TO:· FROM: CONTACT: SUBJECT: Summary: City of Poway COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT October 15, 2019 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Aaron Bean an, Director of Finance ;f5 Aaron Beanan, Director of Finance (858) 668-4411 or abeanan@poway.org Water and Wastewater Rate Study and Public Workshop On March 19, 2019 the City Council directed staff to have Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. (RFC) conduct a comprehensive cost of service study (COSS), evaluate the city's current water and wastewater rates, and develop several rate structures for consideration at a public workshop. The goals of these actions were to help ensure compliance with the law, ensure each rate payer class was paying their proportionate share of the water and wastewater costs, and ensure financial sustainability of both the water and wastewater enterprise funds. This staff report outlines the outcomes of these efforts for consideration by the City Council and the public during the first of two public workshops. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report as an informational item. Discussion: During the City Council discussion at the January 8, 2019 Water and Sewer Rate workshop, the Council expressed interest in conducting a new water and sewer rate study prior to the 2020 rate setting process, as it had been many years since a COSS had been conducted. During the discussion the City Council also indicated the consultant and staff should evaluate different rate structures and how they impact different classes of rate payers. After issuing a Request for Proposal (RFP) on February 4, 2019 to conduct a comprehensive COSS, investigate and evaluate different rate structures and their impacts to rate payers, ensure financial sustainability, and ensure compliance with the law, the city hired RFC. A contract with RFC was recommended to the City Council for approval on March 19, 2019 based on their industry expertise, their extensive experience performing similar studies throughout California, and their familiarity with the city. As the goal of the workshops is to provide several different rate structures and information about how each structure impacts rate payers, multiple options are presented in this staff report. A total of nine different rate design options are presented for water along with four different rate design options for wastewater. Additionally, all rate design options reflect the proposed revenue increases for 2020 and 2021 to fully describe the impacts. The proposed revenue increases are independent of the rate design options and will be more fully discussed in January's Council meeting. The proposed revenue increases are determined by the costs to operate the water and wastewater systems while the rate design options represent different ways to allocate those costs 1 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.114 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 amongst rate payers. It was very important to Council that multiple rate designs were presented along with the associated impacts to ratepayers so that each potential option 's impacts were easily understood. As a result, this staff report is substantially longer, more complex and more techn ical than normal staff reports. All information described in th is report will be presented by staff at the workshops. Through the COSS process , RFC accounts for the costs of providing water and wastewater services and all ocates these costs amongst the rate payer classes based on their current proportional use of the systems. This rebalancing of customer classes' impacts on the system means there will be uneven impacts to rates in year 1 . The rebalancing occurs whenever a cost of service study is updated. The costs of providing services include the costs of importing water into Poway's water system , treating and testing the water, distributing the water to its customers , and transporting any resulting wastewater to San Diego for treatment along with the associated rehabilitation and repair costs for this infrastructure. This information is combined w ith the financial plans for water and wastewate r to develop proposed rates and rate designs. The formal COSS report that outlines this information (i.e . the methodology, cost of service , financial plan , and rate design) is not part of this workshop. This report will be prepared once a water and wastewater rate structure has been selected , from either workshop one or workshop two . Th is is due to the amount of work that would go into compiling a report for the nine different options for water and four different options for wastewater that are presented in this report. This workshop represents the first step in a proposed two-year rate setting process . A two-year rate setting process strikes a balance between flexib ility and efficiency. A two-year period is short enough to allow rate changes if future projections are different than anticipated while also reducing the costs of adopting new rates. The following graph ic shows the proposed timeline for the f irst two-year cycle . I Workshop 1: Oct. 15, 2019 Public Hearing: Mar. 3, 2020 Workshop 2: Nov . 19,2019 Year 1 Rates Effective: Mar. 3, 2020 Set Public Hearing: Jan . 7, 2020 Year 2 Rates Effective: Jan. 1, 2021 Mail 218 Notice: ByJan .17,2020 ' . - Legal Compliance Water and wastewater uti lities are governed by numerous laws . Perhaps the most important, and well known , law governing water and wastewater came about with the passage of the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act in 1996. This proposition added Articles 13C and 130 to the California State Constitution . The following are some of the substantive provisions governing a property-related fee under Article 130: 1. Revenues derived from the fee or charge must not exceed the cost to provide the services, 2. Revenues derived from the fee or charge must not be used for any purpose other than that for which the fee was imposed, 3. The amount of the fee or charge imposed upon any parcel or person as an in ci dent of property ownership must not exceed the proportional cost of the service attributable to the parcel , and 4 . The fee or charge may not be imposed for a service unless the service is actually used by, or immediately available to , the owner of the property subject to the fee or charge. 2 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.115 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 The COSS is the most common way for a local agency to determine what it costs to provide water and wastewater service, including the short and long-term operations, maintenance, financial, and capital expenditures of the systems. The COSS also helps ensure the prop_ortional costs of the water and wastewater services are reasonably allocated to the city's rate payer classes based on the cost differentials required to serve each rate payer class. RFC's COSS analysis helps ensure the city is compliant with these laws. Cost of Service Through the COSS process, RFC accounts for the costs of providing water and wastewater services and allocates these costs amongst the rate payer classes based on their proportional use of the systems. The City of Poway's water and wastewater systems include $100's of millions in infrastructure necessary to provide associated services. This infrastructure includes water assets to transport water from the San Diego County Water Authority's (SDCWA) system to the city's system, assets to treat the water to safe drinking levels, and assets to deliver safe, reliable water on demand to each rate payer's property. The following are some facts about the water system: e 294 miles of transmission and distribution pipelines · 0 5,044 water valves, 21 pressure reducing stations and 14 pump stations ( designed to raise water to higher elevations) a 19 reservoirs (Lake Poway holds ~one billion gallons of water) • One 24 million gallon/day water treatment plant, e 2,435 fire hydrants e Approximately 45,000 tests to ensure Poway water meets or exceeds the State and Federal standards for water quality This also includes infrastructure to transport wastewater from the city to various treatment plants within the County of San Diego in a safe and reliable manner including over 186 miles of wastewater pipes, five lift stations (designed to raise wastewater material to a higher elevation), and over 4,000 maintenance covers. To help ensure the city continues to provide safe, reliable, and affordable water and wastewater services, the city proactively invests in rehabilitation and repair of its infrastructure. For example, the city is proactively investing millions of dollars into the water system's Clearwell reservoir and its associated valves, originally constructed in 1964, to help ensure safe and reliable water continues to be delivered to rate payers while also helping reduce water loss. When a utility experiences water loss in its distribution system, the losses increase production costs and force the utility to buy more water than a rate payer requires. Therefore, reducing water loss helps reduce costs to rate payers. Another example is the city's proactive multi-million-dollar investment into upsizing a wastewater pipe on Martincoit Road. This will help ensure the health and safety of Poway's residents while reducing the risk of clean-up costs and fines that could result from a wastewater spill. A more detailed explanation of current water and wastewater-infrastructure investment is discussed in the city's Fiscal Year 2019-20 Comprehensive Financial Plan. All this physical infrastructure requires highly trained and state-certified city staff to monitor, test, maintain, and repair the water and wastewater systems in ar,1 efficient and effective manner along with prudent long-term financial management to help ensure the sustainability of the systems. The city helps maximize the value to rate payers while minimizing the impacts to rate payers by sharing resources such as financial, human resources, information technology, legal, and executive staff with the city's General Fund that would normally be solely the responsibility of rate payers in standalone districts. In Poway, because these resources are shared, rate payers pay a 3 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.116 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 fraction of the cost for these services helping save money each year. Staff is planning to ask Council for funding before fiscal year end to update the city's cost allocation plan during Fiscal Year 2020-21. The cost allocation plan identifies , documents , and allocates costs incurred by the General Fund that are the responsibility of other funds . Additionally, the city's long-term approach to prudent financial management allows the city to minimize the impacts of capital rehabilitation and renewal , changes in usage, and unplanned emergencies with advanced planning and appropriate reserve levels. As discussed in the legal compliance section , the proportional costs of the water and wastewater services need to be reasonably allocated to the city's rate payer classes based on the cost differentials requ ired to serve each rate payer class . Part of this allocation is based on how a rate payer class uses the system . Factors such as number of rate payers in each class and the demand associated with each class are some examples of how their proportional use of the system is reasonably determined . The following chart shows how each class of water rate payer's use of the system has changed since the last comprehensive study was done in 2007 , based on RFC's analysis . 70% 60 .. , ,. 3Wo 2007 ■2019 Sng.e Fam ty Re;identa 70.0% 72..5°~ Cost of Service by Customer Class {Water) Mut ·Fam ty Re;,dential =-landscape ,rrrgatbn 1 .8% 2.2°& _I -Non-Resdental City Potab e Usage 17.5% 1.0% 15.9% 19% -Re:ycl ed Water 5.H, 3.7% Since 2007 , the single-family residential rate payer class has increased its use of the water system , relative to some of the other rate payer classes. Based on cost of service principles , and to ensure co mplian ce with the law, this means the single-family rate payer class bears a slightly larger share of the overall water system costs , relative to 2007 , while the non-residential rate payer bears slightly less. This shift in cost of service between customer classes means some rates will increase while others may decrease, all else being equal. 4 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.117 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 The chart below shows how each class of wastewater rate payer's use of the system has changed since 2007 , based on RF C's analysis . Cost of Service by Customer Cl ass (Wastewater) 70% 60% 50% 30% 20% 10% 0% Sngle Famjy Resdemial Mu1.-Fam 'Y Resdeitra Non-Resident al 20.1% 20.0•~ ChllfChes& SchoolS 2.3% 2007 ■2019 9.2°'o 110% 2.6% Since 2007 , the single-family residential rate payer class has used proportionally less of the wastewater system than , for example , the multi-family residential rate payer class. This means the single-family residential rate payer class bears a slightly smaller share of the overall wastewater system costs, relative to 2007 , while the multi-family residential rate payer class bears slightly more . This shift in cost of service between customer classes means some rates will increase while others may decrease, all else being equal. Water Rate Design The rate design process develops rates and rate structures that generate revenue from , and within , the various rate payer classes and is completed once the cost of service has been determined and these costs have been allocated to the rate payer classes based on their proportional use of the system . Multiple rate design options may be developed ; each compliant with the law. This is possible because each rate design option is balancing different pricing objectives within a broader legal framework. For example , one rate design option may favor sustainability over affordability by increasing the revenue generated from fixed charges . This is legally compliant as long as fixed charges were reasonably allocated to the city's rate payers based on the cost differentials required to serve each rate payer class . Based on City Council direction , RFC has developed several rate design options for Council consideration and public input. It was very important to Council that multiple rate designs were presented along with the associated impacts to ratepayers so that each potential option 's impacts were easily understood . As discussed in the Cost of Service section above, the rebalancing of customer classes ' impacts on the system means there will be uneven impacts to rates in year 1. This occurs whenever a cost of service study is updated. Subsequent years rate increases will be consistent across rate payer classes. Each option presented is compliant with the law. 5 of 3 0 October 15, 2019, Item #5.118 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Water Residential Rate Payer Class Rate Design Options: RFC has developed several rate design options for the residential rate payer class . The other rate payer classes, such as non-residential , were not given multiple rate design options because their use of the system doesn't lend itself to multiple rate designs. As discussed in the legal compliance section, any rate designs must be based on how a rate payer class is served by the system. A total of nine residential rate design options have been provided for discussion purposes. There are three tier structures: a two tier, three tier, and four tier structure. Within each tier, three different fixed/variable ratios have been provided. The options are as follows: 4 Tiers are related to the volumetric, or variable, revenue collected from rate payers and reflect the increasing costs of supplying more water to residential rate payers who use higher amounts of water. Only three total tier structure options are being presented because they most reasonably reflect an appropriate distribution of expenses. In Poway 's case, a tier structure with five tiers , for example, would less reasonably reflect an appropriate distribution of expenses. The fixed/variable ratio reflects the amount of revenue collected between fixed charges which are not dependent on water usage and volumetric, or variable, charges which are dependent on water usage. This ratio is important for understanding the level of revenue stability . The more revenue is collected via a fixed charge , the less likely the water system will be impacted by changes in rate payer usage. For example, the more revenue is collected via fixed charges, the less likely a water system will be to increase rates in times of conservation as less of its revenue is affected by decreased demand, all else being equal. The first chart on the following page shows water is currently collecting 16 percent of its revenue from fixed charges, and 84 percent of its revenue from variable charges. However, as the second chart shows, the revenue being recovered via fixed charges does not align with water's fixed costs. As shown in the second chart on the following page, 53 percent of water's expenses are fixed costs . When the revenue collected from fixed charges does not match the level of fixed expenses, the water utility is susceptible to revenue volatility (i.e . less revenue stability). The greater the revenue volatility, the more likely rate increases will be required to ensure sufficient funding for operations . 6 of30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.119 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 FYE 2019 Calculated Rate Revenue Fi xed/Variab le Split (Wat e r ) FYE 2019 Expenses Fixed/Variable Split (Water) $0.9M,4% $0.4M, 1% $10.2M,42% Fxed SOCWA Costs(17'» ■ VarablleSDCWA COSlS(~2',\ • Vareble PowavCosts f~'>) $4.lM, 17% $8.6M, 36% F •ed Pcwa, COSlS (36'\) • Va,abeC<tV o'S8'1 D~oCostsll") Fixed costs do not fluctuate with the amount of water purchased or used and represent 53 percent of all costs to Poway . The SDCWA portion of the fixed costs include all their charges to member agencies that do not fluctuate with water purchases including the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) Readiness-to-Serve Charge, the MWD Capacity Charge , the Supply Reliability Charge, the Rate payer Service Charge , the Storage Charge , and the Infrastructure Access Charge. Poway's fixed costs include expenses such as salaries and benefits , maintenance costs and professional services , among others . Variable costs fluctuate with the amount of water purchased or used represent 47 percent of Poway water's expenses. The SDCWA portion the variable costs i nclude the Untreated Supply Rate and Transportation Charge. Poway's variable costs include electricity and water purchases . The variable City of San Diego costs represent the recycled water purchases. Previous industry best practice guidance suggested a fixed/variable ratio of 30/70 . However, this is being moved away from because , as the chart above shows , fixed costs often exceed the previously recommended 30 percent. Instead, best practices suggest balancing revenue stability with other pri cing objectives like affordability. For this reason , three different fixed/variable ratios ar e presented to show the different impacts associated with increasing the amount of revenue collected from fixed charges . 7 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.120 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Water Rate Design Option 1 a (2-Tier Structure: 17% fixed. 83% vari able) Water rate design Option 1 a is most like the city's existing two-tier rate structure . The only difference is increasing the revenue collected via fixed charges from 16 to 17 percent. The table below summarizes the information for this option . 6% 37 units F'med: 56 units Vari able: 83% A ¾" meter is used for analysis purposes throughout the water analysis as it represents over 88 percent of residential meters. It should also be noted that 37 bi-monthly units represents average residential usage while 56 bi -monthly un its represents average summer residential usage. A unit of water is ~ 7 48 gallons which translates to roughly two hot tubs full of water or almost 50 loads of laundry with a high efficiency washing machine. The chart below shows the impacts across various usage levels for this option . SFR Impacts at Different Usage Levels: 3/411 Meter; 2 -Ti e red ; 17%/83% F/V (Opti on la) $1.400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $6 00 ,1 $400 I $200 ■ I so -S95 .SS $149.~ S240.60 S342 . .i4 5578.28 $846.28 lOunits 20 unrts 37 unrts 56 unrts 100 unts 150 unts Cu rrent B I S95 .S8 Slt.9 . .:S S2.!0.60 5342.~ 5578.28 $846.28 ■Proposed B 5105.06 Sl6096 S255.99 5362.20 $608.16 S887.66 lmpact (S) S9 .18 Sll.48 Sl5.39 519.76 S29.88 S.Cl.38 mpaa (%i 9 .6% 7.7% 5.40~ 5 .8% 5.2% 11.9'i> 51,116.57 200 unts 51,116.57 $1 ,171.8 7 555.30 5.0% Given that 94 percent of water usage and 98 percent of all bills fall w ithin Tier 1, residential rate payers falling across all levels of usage see a similar increase and experience a uniform rate per unit of water used . A two-tier structure provides good revenue stability because of this . While similar increases occur across usage levels , lower volume users do see greater impacts which reduces affordability for them . When looking at the impacts to rate payers in a two-tier structure a fixed charge recapturing 17 percent of revenue increases financial sustainability while decreasing affordability for lower volume users. Also, in times of state mandated conservation , a two-tier structure makes it harder for a utility to encourage conservation because there is less pricing incentive to do so. 8 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.121 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Water Rate Design Option 1 b (2-Ti er Structure: 20% f ixed, 80% vari able) In this option, the amount of revenue collected via fixed charges is increased to 20 percent. 6% 2 % 37 units Fixed: 20% 56 units V ariable: 80% Increasing the fixed charges to represent 20 percent of revenue impacts the low volume users more than the high-volume users. This occurs because the amount collected regardless of water use (i.e . fixed charge) increases while the amount collected based on water use (i.e. variable charge) decreases. The chart below shows the impacts across various usage levels for this option . SFR I mpacts at Differ ent Usage Levels: 3/4" Meter; 2-Tiered; 20%/80% F/V (Option lb} $1,2 00 $1,000 $800 $600 I $400 I $200 ■ I so ■ S95.88 $149.-'S S240.60 S342.~ S578.28 $846.28 10 units 20 unrtS 37 unrtS 56 unrts 100 unts 150 unts Current B S95.88 S149.48 S240.60 S342.~ S578.28 $846.28 ■Proposed B S111.29 S165.19 S25682 S359.23 S596.39 $86S.89 Impact ($) S15.41 S15 71 S16.22 S16.79 S18.11 519.61 Impact (~o) 16.1°11 10.5% 6.7'~ 4 .9 % 3 l "'o 2.3% $1,116.57 200 unts $1 ,116.57 $1,139.49 S22.92 2.1% Option 1 b differs from Option 1 a in that it further increases financial sustainability whi le further decreasing affordability for low volume users. Similar to Option 1 a , this rate option variation does not send a strong conservation signal which makes conservation efforts more difficult in times of mandated conservation . 9 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.122 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Water Rate Design Option 1c (2-Tier Structure; 25% fixed, 75% variable) In this option , the amount of revenue collected via fixed charges is in creased to 25 percent. 6% 2% 37 units Fixed: 25% 56 un its Variable: 75% Increasing the fixed charges to represent 25 percent of revenue impacts the low volume users even more t han the high-volume users who see a reduction in their bill. The chart below shows the impacts across various usage levels for this option. SFR Impacts at Different Usage Lev els: 3/4" Meter; 2 -Tiered; 25%/75% F/V (Option le) $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 I $400 I $200 ■ I $0 ■ S95.88 S1~9~ S2~0.60 S342.44 S57S.2S ~6.2S 10 unltS 20 unltS 37 units 56 unltS 100 unts 150 uncs Current B I S95 .88 5149.~ S240.60 5342.44 S578.28 $846.28 ■ Proposed 6 I S121.72 S172.32 S258.34 5354.~ 5577.12 5830.12 1mpact (5 ) S25.84 522.84 517 .7~ S12 .~ ·S1 .16 -516.16 Impact (%) 27.0% 15 .3% 7.~% 3.5% -0 .2% ·1 .9% 51,116.57 200 unts 51,116.57 Sl,086.20 -530.37 ·2.7~ Between all Option 1 variations, this option creates the greatest financial sustainability for water, though it is also the least affordable option for low volume users. Affordability is decreased for low volume users because the amount of the bill they can control (i.e . that portion based on water usage) decreases sign ificantl y. As with the other Option 1 variations , this rate option variation d oes not send a strong conservation signal which makes co nservation efforts more difficult in times of mandated conservation. 10 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.123 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Water Rate Design Opti on 2a (3-Tier Structure; 17% fixed. 83% variable) Water rate design Option 2a creates a three-tier rate structure as shown in the table below. In a three-tier rate structure , the tiers more appropriately reflect the costs of providing water based on how the water is being used. If residential rate payers had consistent water usage throughout the year, the entire water system (e.g . pipes , pump stations , treatment plant, reservoirs , etc.) would be sized a certain way. However, residential rate payers do not use water consistently. Average usage is 37 units of water while average summer usage is 56 units of water. As a result, the entire system size must be increased to accommodate this higher level of usage, even though the usage is inconsistent. The costs associated with the increased system size are proportionally allocated to the higher tiers of water creating a nexus between cost and use . Conservation measures are supported with a three-tier structure . T ier 1 corresponds to ~60 gallons per capita per day (G PCD) for a 4-person average household . The 20 units of water represents the amount related to the cost of basic indoor water use , such as for drinki ng , cooking , and washing . Tier 2 represents the progressively higher cost of providing more water to rate payers for less essential uses, such as watering landscapes, and is reflect ive of average residential summer usage. Tier 3 represents high water usage and the costs associated with providing water for this type of use . The chart below shows the impacts across various usage levels for this option . SFR Impacts at Different Usage Level s: 3/4" Meter; 3-Tiered; 17%/83% F/V {Opti on 2a } $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 I $400 I $200 • ■ so -S95.88 S149.48 5240.60 S342.~ S578.28 58-'6.28 10 unns 20 unns 37 units 56 unlt.S 100 unts 150 unts Current B I S95.88 Sl'-9.48 5240.60 S~2.44 S578.28 $8-46.28 ■ Proposed B I S95 .S6 s1q.s5 5236.7'-5 342.00 S692.2'-S1.090.2'- Impact($) -S0.02 -S6.92 -S3 .86 -S0.44 S113.96 S2'-3.96 Impact(%) 0 .0% -4 .6¾ -1.6% -0.1% 19.7"6 28.8% Sl,116.5 7 200 unts Sl.116.5 7 Sl,488.2'- 5371.67 33.3% Lower volume users see small reductions in their bill while higher volume users see increases in their bills . This occurs because the costs of larger system capacity are more closely aligned with the rate payer usage patterns that created the need for it. 11 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.124 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Water Rate Design Option 2b (3-Tier Structure ; 20% fixed, 80% variable) In this option, the amount of revenue collected via fixed charges is increased to 20 percent. 29% 35% 29% 16% Avera 37 units Fixed: 20% A 56 units 1 Variable: 80% Because fixed charges are increasing, the lowest volume users see a moderate increased impact while the highest volume users see a reduced impact when compared to Option 2a. Low (users falling into the essential water use cat egory) and average users effectively have no impact. The chart below shows the impacts across various usage levels for this option . SFR Impacts at D iffer ent Usage Levels : 3/411 Meter; 3-Ti ered ; 20%/80% F/V (Opti on 2b) $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 I $400 I $200 ■ ■ so -S95 .88 S1-'9.~ S2t.0.60 $~2.U S578.28 ~6.28 l0unrt.s 20unrt.s 37 unrt.s 56 unrt.s 100 unts 150 unts Current B S95.88 S1-'9.~ S2t.0.60 $~2.U S578.28 $846.28 ■ Proposed B JI S103.29 Slt.9 19 S2t.O lt. $3l.1.79 $669.59 S1,042.09 mpacr(S) S7."1 ·$0.29 ·S0.46 -S0.65 $91.31 $195.81 mpact(~o) 7.7"!,c -0.2% -0.2% -0.2~ 15.8~~ 23.1% S1,116.57 200 unts S1,116.57 Sl,t.14 59 S298.02 26.7>~ When looking at the i mpacts to rate payers in a three-tier structure, a fixed charge reca pturing 20 percent of water's fixed costs helps provide an equit able balance between revenue stability, which helps support financi al sustainability, and affordability. While a higher fixed charge would provide more revenue st ability, increasing the fixed charge all at once instead of incrementally over time increases the impacts to rate payers. T his option, like Option 2a, makes it easier to support conservat ion during periods of mandated conservation becau se higher water use is easily discernable through the rate structur e tiers (i.e . consumption levels ) and pricing . However, there is some risk of demand hardening . Demand hardening is a phenomenon generally described as the reduction in the ability of a rate payer to further reduce demand because the more cost-effective water reductions (e.g . low-flow appliances) have already been implemented. It is believed to occur as a result of long-term conservation measure such as education, water restrictions , rebate progr ams, and price structure changes (e .g . tiers) which make it harder to induce further water use reductions during drought/mandated conservation periods. 12 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.125 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Water Rate Design Option 2c (3-Tier Structure: 25% fixed. 75% variable) In this option , t he amount of revenue collecte d via fixed charges is increased to 25 percent. 29% 35% >56 29% 16% 37 units Fixed : 25% 56 units Variable: 75% Because fixed charges are increasing , the lowest volume users see an increased impact while the highest volume users see a reduced impact wh e n compared to Option 2b. Low (users falling into the essential water use category) have a moderat e impact whi le average users have a small impact. The chart below shows the impacts across various usage levels for this option . SFR Impacts at Different Usage Levels: 3/4" Meter; 3-Tiered; 25%/75% F/V (Option 2c) $1,400 $1,2 00 $1,000 $800 $600 I $400 I $200 ■ I so • S95.88 S149.LS S2.!0.60 S3-42 44 S578.28 5846.28 10 unftS 20 units 37 unrtS 56 unJt.S 100 unt.s 150 unt.s Current B 595.88 S14 9.48 S2~.60 S3"C2.44 S578.28 5&'6.28 ■ Proposed B I S115.62 5160.12 52-'5.-'6 5~.84 S631.2-' S961.24 mpact(S) S19.7-' $10.&e $4.86 ·$1.60 S52 .96 5114.96 mpact (%) 20.6% 71% 2.0°'o ·0.5% 9 .2% 13.6% S1,116.57 200 unts S1,116.57 51,291 .24 5174.67 15.6,.. While increasing the revenue collected from fixed charges helps increase the fi n ancial sustainability of the uti lity , it also impacts low volume users more significantly than Option 2b. Compared to Option 1c (2-tier structure ; 25% fixed , 75% variable), it does impact low volume users less. This option also supports conservation t hough it co uld lead to demand hardening as described in Option 2b. 13 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.126 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Water Rate Desi gn Option 3a (4-Tier Structure: 17% f ixed, 83% va riable) This option is lik e a three -tier rate structure wi t h the nexus for Tiers 1 and 2 being the same as a three-tier rate structure . In a four-tier structure , hig her water use is broken out into two t iers instead of only one. An additional high water use category has been added to account for just under 10 percent of residential water use. T his f our-tier rate structure further aligns the costs associated with the increased system size to higher water use, further aligni ng the nexus between cost and use. Staff and RFC agreed looking at a tier structure with five or mor e tiers would be unwise giv en the challenges and data required to legally create tier structures greater than four tiers. T he chart below shows the impacts across various usage levels for this option. Tier Tier Breakpoints (Units) % of Water Use % of Bills 1 20 42% 49% 2 56 29% 35% 3 150 20% 13% 4 >150 9% 3 % 37 units Fixed: 17% 56 units Variable: 83% In a fou r-tier structure, the impacts at lower water usage levels (i.e. 56 bi-monthly units or less) will mirror the three-tier structure. As the consumption increases in a four-tier structure beyond 56 bi-monthly units, the impacts to the higher volume users will slowly shift because the per unit cost of water, or volumetric rate , increases. SFR I mpacts at D iffer ent Usage level s: 3/4" M eter; 4 -Ti e red ; 17%/83% F/V {Opti on 3a) $1,6 00 $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 I $400 I $200 • ■ so -S95 .88 Sll.9.48 S2.!0.60 S3l.2." S578.28 ~6.28 10UMS 20units 37 unrtS 56 units 100 unts 150 unlS Curr ent B I S95 .88 5ll.9.48 52l.0.60 5342.4' $578.28 W6.28 ■ Proposed B I S95.96 51l.2.76 S237.62 S3l.3.6l. 5651.~ Sl,001.6l. lmpact (5) SO.OS -56.72 ·S2.98 S120 573.36 $155.36 Impact (°✓.) 0.1% -4.S°'a ·l 2•~ 0 .4% 12.7% 18.l.% S1 ,116.5 7 200 unts S1 ,116.5 7 51,486.64 5370.07 331~. A four-tier str ucture does not offer mat erially greater benefits than a three-tier structure. Option 2a and Option 3a share very similar impacts across the various usage levels . One risk in a four- tier structure as compar ed to a three-tier structure is there is a greater risk of demand hardening . A higher chance of demand hardening increases the potential to see reduced revenue which would put upward pressure on rates. This could occur if the amount of anticipat ed revenue is not realized due to self-selected conservation . 14 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.127 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Water Rate Design Option 3b ( 4-Tier Structure; 20% fixed, 80% variable) In this option , the amount of revenue collected via fixed charges is increased to 20 pe rcent. 29% 35% 20% 13% 1 4 >150 9% 3% A 37 units Fixed: 20% 1 Average Summer Usage: 56 units Variable: 80% Similar to a three-tier structure , and because fixed charges are increasing , the lowest vo lume users see a moderate increased impact while the highest vo lume users see a reduced impact when compared to Option 3a . Low (users falling into the essential water use category) and average users effectively have no impact. T his option does increase revenue stability due to higher fixed charges which increases the financial sustainability of the utility . The chart below shows the impacts across various usage levels fo r this option . SFR Impacts at Different Usage Levels: 3/4" Meter; 4-Tiered; 20%/80% F/V (Option 3b) $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 I $400 I $200 ■ ■ $0 -S95.88 S1~9.48 S240 60 $3-'2 . .U S578.28 ~6.28 10 unrts 20 unrts 37 unrts 56 unrts 100 unts 150 unts Current B S95 .88 $1.19.48 $240.60 S342.~ S578.28 $846.28 ■ProposedB S103.29 $149.19 5240.65 $342 .87 S634.15 $965.15 mpact(S) $7.41 -S0.29 SO.OS $0.43 S55 .87 S118.87 mpact(%) 7.7% -0.2°~ 0.0% 0.1% 9 7<'{. lil.0% S1,116.57 200 unts S1,116.57 S1.~13.65 S2 97 .08 26.6~ Si milar to Option 2b, a fixed cha rge recaptu ring 20 pe rcent of water's fixed costs helps provide an equitable balance between reve nue stability , which helps support financial sustainability, and affordability. While a higher fixed charge percentage would provide more revenue stability, increasing the fixed charge all at once instead of incrementally over time increases the impacts to rate payers . However, a four-tier structure has increased potential to create demand hardening when compared to a three-tier structure . As discussed in Option 3a , a higher chance of demand hardening increases the potential to see reduced revenue which would put upward pressure on rates. This could occur if the amount of anticipated revenue is not realized due to self-selected conservat ion . 15 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.128 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Water Rate Design Option 3c (4-Tier Structure: 25% fixed, 75% variable) In this option , the amount of revenue collected via fixed charges is increased to 25 percent. Tier Tier Breakpoints (Units) % of Water Use % of Bills 1 20 42% 49% 2 I 56 29% I 35% 3 150 20% I 13% 4 >150 9% ,3% A, ____ ·---: 37 units F"med: 25% Average Summer Usage: I 56 units Variable: I 75% Similar to a three-tier structure , and because fixed charges are increasing , the lowest volume users see an increased impact while the highest volume users see a reduced impact when compared to Option 3b. Low (users f alling into the essential water use category) have a m oderate impact while average users have a sm all impact. Revenue stability and financial sustainability is increased as compared to the previous four-tier options . T he chart below shows the impacts across various usage levels for this option . SFR Impacts at Different Usage Levels: 3/411 Meter; 4-Tiered; 25%/75% F/V (Option 3c) Sl,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 ssoo I $400 I s200 ■ I so • S95 .88 $149.48 $240.60 S342 . .u $578.28 $846.28 l 0unrts 20unrts 37 units 56 units 100 unts 150 unts Current B S9588 S14 9 .48 S2~.60 S342 .44 S578.28 $846.28 ■ Proposed s• S115.62 S160.12 $245.9 7 S3-'1.92 S605.~ 5904 04 mpact (S ) $19.74 $10.~ $5.37 -$0.52 $26.76 $57 76 mpact (%) 20.6;., 7.1% 2.2% ·0.2¾ 4.6% 6.8% S1 ,116.57 200 unts $1 ,116.57 $1 ,291.54 S174 97 15.7 ¾ While increasing the revenue collected from fixed charges helps increase the financial sustainability of the utility, it also impacts low volume users m ore significantly than Option 3b . Compared to Option 1 c (2-tier structure ; 25% fixed , 7 5% variable), it does impact low volume users less. Furth er, a four-tier structure has increased potential to create demand hardening when compared to a three-tier structure . As discussed in Option 3a , a higher chance of dem and hardening increases the potential to see reduced revenue which would put upward pressure on rates . This could occur if the amount of anticipated revenue is not realized due to self-selected conservation . 1 6 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.129 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Water Financial Plan The financial plan for providing water services is an important component of the COSS process. It looks at the financial policies for providing water service, such as how reserve levels are determined or when debt issuance is appropriate. The financial plan also looks at the current and projected level of expenses and examines the amount of revenue required to meet the operational goals of providing water service . The amount of revenue required influences the proposed revenue , or rate, adjustments needed over time. Financial Policies: According to the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA), financial policies provide guidelines for financial decision making and set the strategic intent for financial management and are central to a strategic long-term approach to financial management. As the water utility has no existing debt and no immediate plans to issue debt, only the reserve policies were examined. Based on the American Water Works Association 2018 Cash Reserve Policy Guidelines, the level of reserves maintai ned by a utility is an important component of short and long-term financial management and is a key consideration in the rate-setting process. Defining appropriate reserve levels is important because reserves have the potential to impact rates or tie up current rate payer dollars that could otherwise be used towards current expenditures. The current reserve policy for water is to mai ntain a mini mum working capital balance equal to 20 percent of operating expenditures. However, the Water Environment Federation recommends three months of operating costs, or 90 days, as a m inimum reserve for water utilities. They also indicate higher levels of reserves may be needed based on the actual operational experiences of water utilities. Therefore , 90 days of operating costs is the recommended minimum for Poway's water utility. However, setting a reserve target of six months, or 180 days, is prudent given Poway's bi-monthly billing cycle . Having a higher target equal to twice the recommended minimum helps moderate the cash flow associated with a bi-monthly billing process. Capital reserves generally have less defined guidelines given capital investment varies so much between utilities. The variation occurs because factors such as the age of the system can vary greatly. RFC analyzed the water utility's near-term capital plan to find a reserve target appropriate for Poway. Based on this analysis, a minimum reserve is being recommended at 10 percent of net capital assets . The following chart shows the estimated operating and capital reserves over the next 5 years . 1 7 of 30 ~ $20 0 : 518 i 516 $12 S10 SB $6 S2 so Operati ng & Capital Re se rves (Water) FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 FYE 2023 FYE 2024 -Tota' Reserves October 15, 2019, Item #5.130 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 These reserves wi ll help mitigate potential risks , mitigate revenue fluctuations , and smooth rates. They are also important to mitigate emergencies such as emergency repairs , droughts, natural disasters, and unforeseen economic influences. Revenue Adjustments: Costs to operate a water utility increase over time . San Diego County has a semi-arid climate . Before 1947 , the San Diego region relied on rainfall and groundwater to meets its water needs (SDCWA, Urban Water Management Plan 2010). As the economy and population grew, local water resources became insufficient to meet the region 's water supply needs and required imported water from hundreds of miles away to support the growth. Importing water is very energy intensive. Over-time, the cost to transport this water increases as factors like energy prices increase . Investment by SDCWA into regional water supply and infrastructure projects to reduce reliance on imported water and mitigate the effects of natural disasters, such as earthquakes, is also expensive . For example , SDCWA's investment into the Claude "Bud" Lewis Desalination Plant cost close to $1 billion , but it gave the region a new drought-proof, locally controlled supply of water. Gener al inflation and commensurate wage growth also tend to increase over time . The 20-year rolling average increase in the CPI All Urban Consumers -Los Angeles index was over 2 .5 percent annually. As such, revenue adjustments are needed to cover the increasing costs of providing safe , reliable water on demand to a rate payer. T hese estimated increases are necessary to fund the costs of imported water, operational expenses , capital expenses , and appropriate reserve levels and will be discussed in more detail with the operating financial plan later in this report. The chart below shows the current estimated increases over the next five fiscal years . Revenue Ad justments {Water) 6 O", ?~ 12w • .. ~ aoCJo ~ ::, ~ 30% 100"4 ~ .. 2°"' t ,. 0 v EO"e ~ 0 .:0,. 20". 00,, O", FYE 2020 FY E 2021 FY E 2022 FY£ 2023 FYE 2024 -Revenue Adiustments (Water) - -Oebt Cove race -Requ,red Cover;,ie • Coverag• Alert A two-year rate setting process is being recommended . For the first two years, 4 .5% revenue increases are being recommended . These increases are being recommended regardless of which rate design option is chosen . The rate design options discussed previously determine how the costs are apportioned and , thus , how the revenue is collected . The revenue , or rate, increases are based on the funds requi red to cover anticipated expenses . Based on the financial/operational performance of the water utility during the first two-year period , the rate increases proposed for the next two-year period (2022 and 2023) could increase or decrease; currently estimated at 5.25 percent. 18 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.131 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Staff would only return to Council for rate approval if the second-year rates were too low to sufficiently fund operations . Under the law, any increases beyond the previously approved maximum rate increases require a new public hearing process . If the required second-year rate increase was lower than the approved rate increase , staff could administratively reduce the rate increase. If this were to occur, staff would notify Council and rate payers of the change. Setting two-year rates is more cost-effect ive . It costs upwards of $10 ,000 to set rates based on the printing costs associated with the Proposition 218 notice , the postage costs of mailing the notice , the staff time involved in administering the process , among other reasons . Moving to a two-year rate setting process strikes a balance between flexibility and efficiency. A two-year period is short enough to allow rate changes if future projections are different than anticipated while also reducing the costs of adopting new rates . The chart below shows the projected expenses over the next five fiscal years, along with the current revenue , and the projected revenue based on the proposed increases : .,. s~c C _g $35 i $30 S25 S20 S15 S10 ss so -ss Operating Financial Plan (Water) FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 FYE 2023 FYE 202~ -Operat,nc Expenses Water PurchaS<!S -Rate funded C~~a -OebtServ,ce Net Cashf:ow -current Revenu• - -Proposed Revenue Several factors are currently driving the need for revenue increases over the next several years . First , the costs of imported water continue to increase. Imported water costs represent approximately 60 percent of operating expenditures for Poway's water utility. The SDCWA untreated water rate is increasing 4 .8 percent even though SDCWA is using reserves to mitigate the rate increase necessary . Had they not used reserves , the rate increase for untreated water would have been greater. Some drivers in SDCWA's rate increase are Metropolitan Water District rate increases and Quantification Settlement Agreement (QSA) increases of 6.4 percent. The QSA was part of SDCWA's supply diversification strategy and will provide up to 200,000 acre- feet of water to the San Diego County region not previously available . Second , rate funded capital is increasing over the next five years as the city proactively invests in rehabilitation and repair of its water infrastructure to ensure is continues to provide safe, reliable, and affordable water. A more detailed description of current infrastructure investment is discussed on the city 's Fiscal Year 2019-20 Comprehensive Financial Plan . 19 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.132 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 The chart below shows the cost of the anticipated capital expenditures over the next five years . Capi tal Funding So u rces (Water) S3 5 S3 22 S2.81 52.91 S3.0 S2 5 52.07 S20 S1.44 Sl 5 51.0 S0.5 so.a FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 FYE 2023 NE 2024 ■ Debt Funded • Rates/Reserves Funded e -otalC -P Continued investment into operations and system rehabilitation and renewal , along with long - range prudent financial management, will help ensure the City of Poway continues to provide safe, reliable, and affordable water on demand to its rate payers. Wastewater Rate Design The rate design process develops rates and rate structures that generate revenue from , and within, the various rate payer classes and is completed once the cost of service has been determi ned and these costs have been allocated to the rate payer classes based on their proportional use of the system. Based on City Council direction, RFC has developed several rate design options for Council consideration and public input. Each option presented is compliant with the law. Wastewater Residential Rate Payer Class Rate Design Options: RFC has developed several rate design options for the residential rate payer class. The other rate payer classes, such as non-residential , were not given multiple rate design options because their use of the system doesn't lend itself to multiple rate designs. As discussed in the legal compliance section, any rate designs must be based on how a rate payer class is served by the system. A total of four residential rat e design options have been provided for discussion purposes. There are two different structures: a fixed residential rate and a fixed plus variable residential rate. Within the fixed plus variable structure, three different fixed/variable ratios have been provided . The options are as follows : Option Structure Fixed (%) Variable (%) 1 Faed NIA I 2a I Fixed + Variable 20% 80% I 2b FDCed + Variable 25% I 75% j 2c I Fixed + Variable I 30% I 70% I A fixed , or uniform, residentia l rate is independent of winter water usage; all residential rate payers are charged the same bi-monthly rate . In the fixed plus variable rate structure, all rate payers are billed a fixed charge, similar to water, and have a variable component tied to their w inter water usage. This information will be discussed in more detail on the following page. 20 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.133 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Three different fixed/variable ratios are provided because , sim ilar to water, this is an important component of rate design. The fixed/variable ratio reflects the amount of revenue collected between fixed charges which are not dependent on wastewater flow and volum etric, or variable , charges which are dependent on wastewater flow. This ratio is important for understanding the level of revenue stability. The more revenue is collected via a fixed charge , the less likely the wastewater system will be to changes in usage by its rate payers. For example , the more revenue is collected via fixed charges, the less likely a wastewater system will be to increase rates in times of conservation as less of its revenue is affected by decreased demand, all else being equal. The chart below shows wastewater is currently collecting 20 percent of its revenue from fixed charges, and 80 percent of its revenue from variable charges. FYE 2019 Calculated Rate Revenue Fixed/Variable Split (Wastewater) h .edRevenue • Varebl!Re.'etUe Similar to water, the revenue being recover ed via fixed charges does not align with wastewater's variable and fixed costs . The variable costs , such as chemicals and treatment , vary based on how much wastewater is produced . As shown in the chart below, approximately 50 percent of wastewater's expenses are fixed costs . Fixed costs include expenses such as salaries and benefits , maintenance costs and professional services , among others. FYE 2019 Expenses Fixed/Variable Split (Wastewater) • h:eCI • Va,ebl! Similar to water, best practices suggest balancing the various pricing objectives versus having a set fixed/variable ratio . As such , three different fixed/variable ratios are presented showing the different impacts associated with increasing the amount of revenue collected from fixed charges . 21 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.134 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Wastewater Rate Design Option 1 (Fixed residential rate) Wastewater rate design Option 1 is a fixed residential rate. All residential wastewater rate payers would pay the same bi-monthly amount for wastewater services regardless of winter water use, which is different from the City's current tiered structure . A fixed res idential rate structure is easy for the city to administer helping reduce costs . Revenue stability is increased with this structure because of the uniform rate . However, this structure does not account for variation in wastewater flow which can raise questions of fairness and equity. The chart below shows how this structure visually compares to the current structure. 5160 S140 S120 S100 $60 S60 S20 so Bi-Monthly SFR Bills (Wastewater) I ••••••••• / ............ "4.1-1 ................. .. / .................. ~ ........... _ ~.-.............. _ , ................. , ·r ················································ Cu r rent ....-Proposed -New Structure 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 Bi -Monthl y W i nter Water Use (un i ts) Under a fixed residential wastewater rate structure, low volume users will see a significant increase in their bill and higher volume users will see a significant decrease in their bill. These impacts are shown in the chart below at various usage levels. The usage levels shown represent the tier breakpoints in the current wastewater rate structure. SFR Impacts at Different Usage Levels: Option 1 S160 S1~ S120 S100 sso S60 $40 S20 so 5 unrts 12 unrts 19 units 26 unrts 37 units 50 unrts 60 unrts Current 8 I S50.88 S73 .46 S99.79 S107 .33 S122.38 S137.43 S148.73 ■ Proposed B I $88.76 $88.76 $88.76 $88.76 $88.76 $88.76 $88.76 Impact (S) S37 .88 S15 .30 -S11 .03 -S18.57 -S33.62 -$48.67 -S59.97 Impact (%) 744% 20.8% -11.1% -17.3% -27.5% -35.4% ~.3% 22 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.135 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Wastewater Rate Design Option 2a (Fixed + variable rate structure: 20% fixed, 80% variable) This wastewater rate design option includes a fixed plus variable component and mirrors the existing wastewater structure . In the fixed plus variable rate structure, all rate payers are billed a fixed charge, similar to water, and have a variable component tied to their winter water usage. The chart below shows how this structure visually compares to the cu rrent structure . 5160 5140 5120 S100 sso $60 540 S20 so l 3 5 7 9 Bi-Monthly SFR Bills (Wastew ater) Current ~ Proposed -New Structure 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 ~1 ~3 45 ~7 ~9 51 53 55 57 59 8 1-Month y Winter W a ter Use (units) Based on an analysis of winter water use by RFC during this COSS, the average res idential rate payer's wastewater flow is 15 units bi-monthly. Further, they found that residential wastewater flows should be capped at 24 units bi-monthly. Capping water consumption when determining wastewater use provides a reasonable estimate of indoor water use that actually enters the wastewater system and is ultimately processed at the treatment plant. This helps minimize the impacts of outdoor irrigation-related water use and is a more fair and equitable approach to rate payers. To calculate winter water usage on an ongoing basis , the City uses a three-year rolling average of winter water use data for a residential property coveri ng the November through Apri l bi-monthly billing periods. This approach provides a less volatile change in annual rates to the property year over year. The lowest winter billing period for each of the three most recent years is selected and averaged together. This amount represents the winter water use, or essential water use, for the property. To reflect that not all indoor water use is returned to the wastewater system , a factor of 85 percent is used. This factors in water use for cooking , cleaning , and other activities that don't put water down the drain. To calculate the wastewater rate applicable to a rate payer in this type of structure, the w inter water use for the property is multiplied by the variable rate to provide the variable component of the wastewater bill. The variable component is then added to the fixed component to provide the bi-monthly wastewater charge for the rate payer. While this process m irrors the existing wastewater rate calculation process, it differs in an important way. Previously, when a rate payer moved into a house, they were placed in Tier 3 because they did not have an individual winter water use history. The rate payer was placed in Tier 3 because that represented the average usage of all residential customers based on the last analysis of usage. As shown in the chart above , that could lead to over-charging or under-charging an individual i n many cases. As the new rate payer established winter water use history, their 23 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.136 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 actual wastewater bill would slowly adjust to the ir usage patterns. In many cases, this could take up to three years to mirror their usage patterns. Based on feedback surrounding the existing residential wastewater rate ca lculation process , staff look for a more fair and equitable way to determine a rate payers winter water usage without significantly increasing the admin istrative process , and thus cost to rate payers , of doing so . As such , the calculation of winter water use, which is foundational to determin ing a rate payer's wastewater rate , will now focus on the property and not the individual rate payer. This approach places more value on wastewater flow patterns being a function of the property characteristics than the rate payers occupying the property. For example , a rate payer moving into a one-bedroom house is more likely to mirror the wastewater flow pattern of t he previous occupant in that one-bedroom house than a rate payer in a four-bedroom house . The ratepayer in this example will start at the w inter water usage associated with that one-bedroom property under the new approach . While there will still be fluctuations in wastewater f low patterns , this is a more fai r and equitable approach because it reduces the likelihood of an individual rate payer paying more or less than they should. The chart below shows the i mpacts across various usage levels for this option . $160 S140 S120 S100 580 S60 5-'0 S20 so Cu rr ent B ■ProPQSed B Impact($) Impact (%) SFR Im pa cts a t Diffe rent Us age l e v e ls: 20%/80 % F/V (Opt io n 2 a) I Sunrts SS 0.88 ~275 -58.13 -16.0% I 12 unrts S73.46 sn 1a ~.28 5.8 % 19 unrts $99 79 S112.74 S12.95 13.0% 26 units $107 33 $137 73 S30.40 28.3% 37 unrts $122.38 S137 73 S15.35 12.5% SO units S137.~3 S137 73 $0.30 0 .2% 60 unrts S1~.73 S137.73 ·S11.00 This option collects 20 percent of the revenue through fixed charges which is consistent with the city's existing tiered wastewater rate structure. Lower volume users and higher volume users will see decreases in their bill , while users in the middle will see i ncreased impacts . This is a function of how a tiered wastewater structure operates compared to a fixed plus variable structure. The c hart on the previous page can help visually explain this phenomenon. The revenue stability is good under this option and the affordability for the lowest volume customers is high. 24 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.137 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Wastewater Rate Design Option 2b (Fixed+ variable rate structure: 25% fixed, 75% variable) In this option , the amount of revenue collected via fixed charges is increased to 25 percent. Increasing the revenue collected from fixed charges helps increase the financial sustainability of the utility. The chart below shows the i mpacts across various usage levels for this option . SF R Impacts at Di ffe r ent Usage Lev els: 25%/75% F/V (Option 2b) $160 Sle0 $120 SlOO sso $60 sec $20 so ■Current B I ■ Proposed B I Impact ($) Impact (%) I 5 unrtS SS0 .88 S45.62 -SS.26 -10.3% I 12 unrtS S73A6 $78.~3 $4.97 6.8% 19unrts $99.79 Slll.24 Sll.45 26 unrtS 5107.33 $134.67 $27.~ 25.5% 37 unrtS $122 38 $134.67 $12.29 10.0 3/o 50 unrts $137.43 Sl~.67 -$2.76 -2.0¾ 60 unrts $148.73 $134.67 -Sl~.0 6 -9.5% This option increases the revenue stability over Option 2a by increasing the amount of revenue collected via fixed charges while still offering good affordability to the lowest volume rate payer. Users with usage in the middle will start to see some reduced impacts as compared to the impacts in Option 2a. This occurs because the variable rate per unit decreases as the fixed charges increase. The more usage occurs , when compared to Option 2a , the lower the per unit cost. 25 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.138 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Wastewater Rate Design Option 2c (Fixed+ variable rate structure: 30% fixed, 70% variable) In this option , the amount of revenue collected via fixed charges is increased to 30 percent. Increasing the revenue collected from fixed charges helps increase the financial sustainability of the utility. The chart below shows the impacts across various usage levels for this option . SFR Impacts at Different Usage Levels: 30%/70% F/V (Option 2c) $160 $140 $120 $100 $30 S60 ~ S20 so ■Current 6 I • Proposed 6 I 1m pact (S) Impact(¾) I 5 units S50.88 5-18.50 ·S2.38 -4.7% I 12unrts S73.46 579.12 S5.66 7.7% 19 units S99.79 S109.7tJ. S9.95 10.0% 26 units S107.33 S131 .61 S2t..28 22.6% 37 unrtS S122.38 S131.61 S9.23 SO units S137.tJ.3 S131.61 ·S5.82 60 unrtS S148.73 S131.61 -S17.12 ·11.53/c In Option 2c , the lowest volume users still see a reduced impact when compared to the city's current wastewater structure which helps increase affordability. Almost all users in the middle usage areas see decreased impacts from either Option 2a or 2b while high volume users see more of a reduction in impact. As discussed earlier, for high volume users this is driven by the new cap in usage to recognize water beyond 24 units is more likely than not to be related to outdoor water usage which does not impact the wastewater system . When looking at the impacts to rate payers across all wastewater options , a fixed charge recapturing 30 percent of wastewater's fixed costs helps provide an equitable balance between revenue stability , which helps support financial sustainability, and affordability. Wastewater Financial Plan Similar to the discussion for water, the financial plan for providing wastewater services is an important component of the COSS process . It looks at the financial policies for providing wastewater service , such as how reserve levels are determined or when debt issuance is appropriate. The financial plan also looks at the current and projected level of expenses and examines the amount of revenue required to meet the operational goals of providing wastewater service . The amount of revenue required influences the proposed revenue, or rate , adjustments needed over time . Wastewater Collection Method : Staff looked at how wastewater revenue could be collected for residential rate payers. This analysis was done given upcoming legislation relating to the discontinuation of residential water service titled Senate Bill No . 998 (SB 998). It was contemplated that collecting residential wastewater bills on the property tax rolls could help reduce the impact to a rate payer's monthly 26 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.139 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 bill. The idea was an individual may be more likely to pay their water bill and avoid discontinuation of service if their bill did not include the wastewater portion (i.e . it was lower). There are several challenges associated with collecting wastewater bills via the tax rolls. It would be administratively challenging because a full year's worth of bills must be calculated and submitted to the County Auditor Controller by August 10th of each year. This would increase the staff resources needed to administer such a collection method increasing costs to rate payers . It would be financially challenging because residential wastewater revenue represents 77 percent of total wastewater revenue and the cash received is generally in two large installments, after the December 10 and April 10 property tax delinquency dates. Higher reserve levels would need to be maintained to deal with the cash flow timing issues under this collection method increasing costs to rate payers. Upon completion of this analysis, staff does not recommend collecting residential wastewater bills via the property tax roll. Financial Policies : Similar to water, the current reserve policy for wastewater is to maintain a minimum working capital balance equal to 20 percent of operating expenditures. Consistent with the newly proposed water operating reserve levels , and for the same reasons , the recommended minimum operat ing reserves are 90 days of operating costs with a target reserve of 180 days. As discussed in the financial policies section for water, capital reserve levels generally vary based on conditions specific to each utility. In the case of wastewater, a minimum reserve based on the 5-year average capital improvement program (C IP) is recommended because it more closely matches the estimated debt service payments for the San Diego Pure Water program , a large portion of wastewater's overall CI P . San Diego 's Pure Water project is a multi-year project that is projected to supply one-third of San Diego's water supply locally by 2035 . The following chart shows the estimated operating and capital reserves over the next 5 years . "' Slt. C 0 :::: S12 ~ S10 S6 S2 so Operating & Capital Reserves {Wastewater) FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 rVE 2023 FVE 2024 _.,.ota lReserves -M,n,mumR eserve -iareetRl!S'!<Ve Reserve levels are well in excess of the newly established targets. This was a strateg ic financial management decision in preparation for San Diego Pure Water. Funds to help cover Poway's estimated share of this regional project have slowly been set aside to mitigate impacts to rate payers . As the chart shows , the reserves are going to be drawn down over the near-term to help pay Poway's share of the Pure Water project. 27 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.140 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Similar to water, wastewater reserves will also help mitigate potential risks , mitigate revenue fluctuations , and smooth rates. They are also important to mitigate emergencies such as emergency repairs , droughts, natural disasters, and unforeseen economic influences. Revenue Adjustments : As with water, the costs to operate a wastewater system increase over time. Part of the upward pressure on costs relate to general inflation and aging infrastructure , like water. However, the cost to treat wastewater is also increasing. A wastewater treatment plant is designed to treat certain types of waste . As people dispose of pharmaceuticals , food waste , cooking oil , industrial chemicals, etc. down the wastewater system , the treatment process gets extended which increases costs . It also increases the maintenance of the system driving operating costs higher. Revenue adjustments are needed to cover the increasing costs of providing safe and rel iable wastewater services to rate payers . The chart below shows the current estimated increases over the next five fiscal years . Revenue Adjustments (Wastewater) 1.:o% 60% 120% 100>. ., .. so~ :: ... :,, 0 60% u .i, ~% 0 10% 20% O.O?o <>"• F'IE2020 FYE 2021 F'IE202l FYE 2023 FYE 202.: -Reienue Adjusi:ments (Wastewater! -DebtCOJ~e -Requ·red Coverage • CovefaieAfen These estimated increases are necessary to fund the costs of wastewater treatment, operational expenses, capital expenses, and appropriate reserve levels . Increases are being proposed even though reserves are being drawn down. This is a long-range financial management approach to mitigating impacts to rate payers of the Pure Water project. If reserves were used until they were below recommended minimum levels , multi-year double digit rate increases would be required to fund Poway's share of the Pure Water project and reple nish reserves . Using a combination of reserves and rate increases reduces the overall rate increases needed to fund operations which reduces costs to rate payers . Similar to water, a two-year rate setting process is also being recommended for wastewater. This approach will help save wastewater rate payers money while still providing flexibility in the financial management of the utility. 28 of 30 October 15, 2019, Item #5.141 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 The chart below shows the projected expenses over the next five years , along wi th the current revenue and projected revenue based on the projected increases . "' S14 C 1 $12 ~ S10 S8 S6 S2 so -S2 -~ Operating Fi nanci al Pl an (Wa stew at e r) FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 FYE 2023 FYE 2024 -operatirig Expenses Ra:eFundedCap11a -DebtSeni,ce NetCa!hf.ow -CurremRevenue - -ProposedRevenue As the chart shows , even with the recommended rate increases , revenues are not sufficient to fund operations and capital investment. As discussed previously , reserves are being drawn down to help cover the shortfalls shown in the chart. Several factors are currently driving the need for revenue increases over the near term . First , San Diego's Pure Water project is a multi-year project that is projected to supply one -third of San Diego's water supply locally by 2035 . Based on projections from Apri l 2019 , Poway's estimated share of the project is over $4 million annually for the next five years. Second , rate funded capital is being proactively invested in the rehabilitation and repair of the wastewater infrastructure to ensure Poway continues to provide safe , reliable , and affordable wastewater services . A more detailed description of current infrastructure investment is discussed in the City's Fiscal Year 2019-20 Comprehensive Financial Plan . The chart below shows the anticipated capital expenditures over the next five years . Ca p i t al Fund i n g So u r ces (Wastew ater) S18 Sl.70 "' C ,g S16 ~ St.a Sl .29 Sl.2 S1.00 Sl.0 S08 S0.61 S06 S0.45 so.i: SO 2 SO.O FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 FYE 2023 FYE 2024 ■ Debt Funded ■ Ra es/Reserves Funded •TotalC IP Continued investment into operations and system rehabilitation and renewal , along with long- range prudent financial management, will help ensure the City of Poway continues to provide safe , reliable , and affordable wastewater services to its rate payers . 29 of 3 0 October 15, 2019, Item #5.142 of 42 November 19, 2019, Item #5.1 Environmental Review: This action is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Fiscal Impact: There is no direct fiscal impact associated with this staff report because it only contains information related to the workshop. However, based on the information contained in this staff report, sufficient revenues to fund operations, investment in capital infrastructure, and appropriate reserve levels will be generated from the recommended water and wastewater revenue increases staff will present to the City Council on January 7, 2020 when it is anticipated the City Council will set the public hearing for rate adoption on March 3, 2020. The proposed revenue increases are independent of what rate design Council ultimately pursues. The revenue increases are determined by the costs to operate the water and wastewater systems while the rate designs deal with how those costs are allocated amongst rate payers. Over the next two-year period, it is estimated approximately $2 million in additional water revenues will be generated while approximately $900 thousand in additional wastewater revenues will be generated. Safe reliable water delivered on demand to an average residential rate payer costs less than nine- tenths of one penny per gallon. Treating the average residential rate payer's wastewater in a safe and reliable fashion also costs less than nine-tenths of one penny per gallon. Public Notification: None. Attachments: None. Reviewed/Approved By: Assistant City Manager 30 of 30 Reviewed By: Alan Fenstermacher City Attorney Approved By: Ch~ City Manager Item 8.1 Public Employee Performance Evaluation Gov. Code § 54957(B)(1) Title: City Manager