Item 3.1 - Visual slideshow presented by Staff at MeetingPoway Commons
Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 19-005/
Development Review (DR) 19-004
•Development Agreement approved by City Council on March
19, 2019
•Included 98 market-rate units & 44 senior-affordable
apartments
•Established development schedule
•Set forth type and scale of development
Poway Commons
Public Space
Lot 2
Lot 3 Lot 4
Lot 5
Lot 1
Lot 5
Poway Rd.Civic Center Dr.Tarascan Dr.Skate Park
Library
N
Public Space
Internal Street Easement
Poway Rd.Civic Center Dr.Tarascan Dr.Skate Park
Library
N
Setbacks
Affordable Housing Incentives
Required Proposed
15 feet for first 2 floors next to residential (Lot 5 side yard)10 feet for first 2 floors
18 feet for third and fourth floors next to residential (Lot 5
side yard)
10 feet with 18.3 average setback
10 feet for residential (Lot 5 side yard –Civic Center Dr.)7.1 feet
10 feet for residential (Lot 2 front and side yard –affordable
apartments)
5 feet
Affordable Housing Incentives
Wall Height
Allow a 6 ft. increase in allowable
wall height along west property
line on Lot 5 adjacent to single-
family residential
12 ft. wall/fence
Mixed-Use Requirements
Affordable Housing Incentives
Required Proposed
75% ground floor commercial space
along any block face
0 commercial space along Poway Rd. & Tarascan Dr. for
affordable apartment building
Approximately 10% along Poway Rd. & Civic Center Dr.
Required Proposed Net Gain/Loss
297 spaces (entire project)283 spaces Deficit (-14)
239 spaces (Lot 5) 205 spaces Deficit (-34)
24 spaces (Affordable Building)44 spaces Excess (+20); can’t use for market-rate
34 spaces (Lot 1)34 spaces
Parking
Considerations for parking reductions:
1.Adjacent Bus Stop
2.Adjacent Off-site Parking at Library and Community Park
3.Nearby On-street Parking
4.Bicycle Storage
•Project specific traffic study prepared
•Poway Rd. will operate under capacity with project
•Intersection Level of Service remains unchanged
Traffic Analysis
•Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) adopted by City
Council
•Additional biological, historical resource, hazardous material,
and traffic studies prepared
•No further environmental analysis required
California Environmental Quality Act
Discussion