The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 9 - Reso Approving Midblock Crosswalks on Kirkham west of General Atomics Wy and on Stowe Between Scripps Poway and KirkhamDATE: TO: FROM: CONTACT: SUBJECT: Summary: AGENDA REPORT CityofPoway March 17, 2020 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Coun8; A Robert Manis, Director of Development Services"f'V\ Melody Rocco, City Engineer µj,- (858) 668-4653 or mrocco@poway.org CITY COUNCIL A Resolution Approving Midblock Crosswalks on Kirkham Way west of General Atomics Way and on Stowe Drive Between Scripps Poway Parkway and Kirkham Way General Atomics submitted requests to install mid block pedestrian crosswalks on Kirkham Way west of General Atomics Way and on Stowe Drive between Scripps Poway Parkway and Kirkham Way to accommodate pedestrian traffic between General Atomics facilities. Based on technical studies prepared for General Atomics, the requested crosswalks are appropriate with the recommended traffic improvements. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Resolution . Discussion: General Atomics has requested approval to install two midblock pedestrian crosswalks, one on Kirkham Way west of General Atomics Way and one on Stowe Drive between Scripps Poway Parkway and Kirkham Way. Attachment B shows the proposed crosswalk location on Kirkham Way, approximately 840 feet west of General Atomics Way. Attachment C shows the second proposed crosswalk location on Stowe Drive, approximately 430 feet south of Scripps Poway Parkway and 790 feet north of Kirkham Way. The purpose of the crosswalks is to facilitate the pedestrian connectivity between the existing General Atomics facilities located on both sides of Kirkham Way and Stowe Drive . In the past several years, General Atomics has acquired several new properties in the Poway Business Park . The new facilities tend to be located in proximity to existing facilities and in turn have created additional pedestrian traffic between buildings and lots . On April 9, 2019, staff received a technical report from General Atomics (Attachment D) prepared by LLG Engineers, evaluating a proposed crosswalk on Kirkham Way and providing recommendations regarding the proper implementation of the proposed i mprovement. On April 18, 2019, staff received a second technical report from General 1 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Atomics (Attachment E) also prepared by LLG Engineers, evaluating a second proposed crosswalk on Stowe Drive and providing recommendations regarding the proper implementation of the proposed improvement. The technical analyses prepared by LLG Engineers for both locations used a policy by the City of San Diego as basis for evaluating mid block crosswalks. The City of Poway does not currently have a policy in place for evaluating midblock crosswalks. Based on the analysis documented in the Kirkham Way technical report, a pedestrian activated signal was not warranted in this location and recommendations were made that a midblock crosswalk could be installed with rapid flashing beacons. While not identified in the report, it is anticipated that there will be a significant increase in pedestrian volumes as more General Atomics employees begin using the recently constructed buildings on the south side of Kirkham Way. There is also an anticipated increase in vehicular traffic with the development of property east of General Atomics Way and a future extension of Kirkham Way to Scripps Poway Parkway. Staff indicated to General Atomics that in order to be supportive of a mid block crossing in this location, due to projected traffic volumes along with width and speed of the roadway (45 mph), a pedestrian activated signal would need to be installed. A pedestrian activated signal is one that would be green for vehicles driving on Kirkham Way until a pedestrian pushes a button activating the signal, creating a red light for vehicles. The City of San Diego policy does not address mid block crosswalks on streets with 85 th percentile speeds over 40 mph. The 85 th percentile speed in this area, per the technical report, is 46 mph. The proposed improvements on Kirkham Way will include installation of a new pedestrian activated signal, signing and striping, and ADA curb ramps. At the request of General Atomics, a mid block crosswalk on Stowe Drive, approximately 540 feet south of the new proposed location, was presented to the Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) on September 28, 2011. The TSC recommended approval and in December 2011 the City Council approved the proposed installation. Based on the analysis documented in the Stowe Drive technical report received in April 2019, this second location meets the minimum warrants for a marked midblock crosswalk . The recommended improvements to facilitate a second pedestrian crosswalk are similar to the existing crossing and include crosswalk lighting, signing and striping, ADA curb ramps, and a pedestrian refuge. General Atomics indicated the need for a second crosswalk due to an increase in their staff crossing Stowe Drive in the requested location. The installation of two mid block crosswalks on Stowe Drive is acceptable due to the distance between the two crossings which is approximately 540 feet. At its meeting on February 12, 2020, the Traffic Safety Committee (TSC), voted unanimously to support staffs recommendation to approve the installation of both marked midblock crosswalks with appropriate improvements. There were no speakers at the TSC meeting for this item. Upon approval of the Resolution, General Atomics will complete their crosswalk designs and submit for a Street Improvement plan through the Land Development division of the Development Services Department. All costs associated with the plan review, construction, and inspection of these crosswalks will be paid for by General Atomics. Environmental Review: This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA}, pursuant to Section 15301 (c) of the CEQA Guidelines, as it involves the addition of a pedestrian crossing on an existing road that will not create additional automobile lanes . 2 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Fiscal Impact: None. The improvements will be designed and constructed by General Atomics . Public Notification: A Notice of City Council Meeting has been sent to all property owners within 500 feet of each proposed midblock crosswalk location. Attachments: A. Resolution B. Kirkham Way Location Map C. Stowe Drive Locat ion Map D. Technical Report dated April 9, 2019 for Kirkham Way E. Technical Report dated April 18, 2019 for Stowe Drive Reviewed/ Approved By: Wendy(Kaserman Assistant City Manager 3 of 51 Reviewed By : Alan Fenstermacher City Attorney Approved By: Chr~ City Manager March 17, 2020, Item #9 RESOLUTION NO. 20- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING MIDBLOCK CROSSWALKS ON KIRKHAM WAY WEST OF GENERAL ATOMICS WAY AND ON STOWE DRIVE BETWEEN SCRIPPS POWAY PARKWAY AND KIRKHAM WAY WHEREAS, Section 21100 of the California Vehicle Code permits local authorities to adopt by resolution traffic control measures meeting the requirements set forth under Section 21351 of the California Vehicle Code; WHEREAS, Section 21351 of the California Vehicle Code permits local authorities to place and maintain such traffic devices upon streets and highways as may be necessary to properly indicate and carry out the provisions of the local ordinances and to warn or guide traffic; WHEREAS, Section 21106 of the California Vehicle Code permits local authorities to establish crosswalks between intersections; WHEREAS , Part 3 "Marking" of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) provides guidance as to when and where an appropriate midblock crosswalk should be established; WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that a midblock crosswalk with appropriate signing, marking, and roadway improvements, including a pedestrian activated signal, as evaluated in the technical study dated April 9, 2019, should be established on Kirkham Way west of General Atomics Way for a safe and orderly crossing of pedestrians; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that a midblock crosswalk with appropriate signing, marking, and roadway improvements outlined in the technical study dated April 18 , 2019, should be established on Stowe Drive between Scripps Poway Parkway and Kirkham Way for a safe and orderly crossing of pedestrians. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Poway as follows: SECTION 1: In accordance with said Section 21106 of the California Vehicle Code, a midblock crosswalk with appropriate signing, marking , and roadway improvements, including a pedestrian activated signal , as evaluated in the technical study dated April 9, 2019, shall be established on Kirkham Way west of General Atomics Way. SECTION 2: In accordance with said Section 21106 of the California Vehicle Code, a midblock crosswalk with appropriate signing, marking, and roadway improvements outlined in the technical study dated April 18, 2019, shall be established on Stowe Drive between Scripps Poway Parkway and Kirkham Way. 4 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Resolution No. 20- Page 2 PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Poway, California on the 17th day of March 2020 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DISQUALIFIED: Steve Vaus, Mayor ATTEST: Faviola Medina, CMC, City Clerk 5 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Print Date: 2/25/2020 Kirkham Way Location Map Map Scale: 1:2,257 Disclaimer: Mij m ~11 data are beieved to be accurate 1 but acruracy is not guaATeT. ~~ij,M m.to~ment and should not be subst~uted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verifcation. March 17, 2020, Item #9 Print Date: 2/25/2020 Stowe Drive Location Map Map Scale: 1:2,257 Disclaimer: M9Z SJf ~'\1 data are beieved to be accurate , but acrurac yis not gua~"J:~M. ~ ~Jd,ument and shoukj not be subst~uted fora title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. March 17, 2020, Item #9 To : From: Mr. Nirav Desai General Atomics John P. Keating, P .E. Kamal Bhayal LLG, Engineers Date : April 9, 2019 LLG Ref: 3-19-3001 Subject: Evaluation of controlled pedestrian crossing on Kirkham Way The following memorandum has been prepared to evaluate and determine if the proposed controlled pedestrian crosswalk to be located on Kirkham Way between Stowe Drive and General Atomics Way satisfies the criteria used by public agencies. The warrant analysis is based on the warrants described in the City of San Diego Council Policy 200-07 . Figure 1 shows the vicinity map. Existing Conditions: Effective evaluation of the midblock crosswalk requires an understanding of the current conditions in the vicinity. The following is a brief discussion of the existing conditions on Kirkham Way : Kirkham Way is classified as a Business Park Collector in the City of Poway General Plan and is constructed as a four-lane roadway with a center two-way left- tum lane (TWLTL). The roadway is 64-foot wide including curb and gutter. No bike lanes are provided and on-street parking is prohibited. Contiguous sidewalks exist on both sides of Kirkham Way. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. For the purpose of this study, LLG collected 24-hour Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts and a speed survey for three consecutive weekdays on Kirkham Way where the crosswalk is proposed. Attachment A contains the recent traffic data, such as speed surveys and vehicular/pedestrian counts. The data are summarized in the Table J and Table 2. TABLE 1 TRAFFIC COUNTS SUMMARY Date ADT 85% Speed (mph) EB WB Combined EB WB Average Tuesday, March 19, 2019 1,609 1,283 2,892 49.5 44.1 46.8 Wednesday, March 20, 2019 1,620 1,317 2,937 48 .9 43.8 46 .3 Thursday, March 21, 2019 1,639 1,302 2,941 47 .5 44 .3 45.9 3-Day Average 1,623 1,301 2,923 48.6 44.1 46.3 8 of 51 ATTACHMENT D LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN engineers Engineers & Planners Traffic Transpo rtation Parking Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 4542 Ruffner Street Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92111 858 .300.8800 T 858 .300 .8810 F www.llg engineers.com Pasaden a Irvine San Diego Woodland Hill s March 17, 2020, Item #9 Hour Begin 10AM 11 AM 12 Noon 1 PM TOTAL TABLE2 PEDESTRIAN VOLUME DATA Major Street (both Total Pedestrian Crossing approaches) the Major Street 180 13 207 16 215 38 202 18 804 vehicles 85 pedestrians The recorded traffic level for Kirkham Way was (average of three days) 2,923 ADT. The 85 th percentile speed on Kirkham Way revealed that the eastbound and the westbound 85 th percentile speed (average of three days) is 48.6 mph and 44.0 mph, respectively. The accident history was researched from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the most recent five years (2013-2018) on Kirkham Way within study area. No collisions were noted in the last five years on Kirkham Way between Stowe Drive and General Atomics Way. Warrant Analysis The City of San Diego pedestrian crosswalk guidelines (Council Policy 200-07) provide a methodical approach to analyze pedestrian crossing locations for the installation of marked pedestrian crosswalk. These guidelines were selected because they are more comprehensive than what the City of Poway has. The Council Policy 200-07 proposes two warrants system, a basic warrants and point warrants. The basis warrant outlines 6 warrants and a point warrant system with a total 38 possible points. A location must satisfy all basic warrants and a minimum 16 points in the point warrants in order to be considered a marked crosswalk. The policy also provides guidelines for crossing treatment once the proposed location satisfy all the warrants. The warrants per the City council policy are as follows: 9 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Basic Warrants: Warrant Policy# Description Requirements Measured Result Pedestrian Must be equal or greater 3 8 Pedestrians ( 12 PM to 2 .1.1 Volume than 10 Pedestrian per 1 PM) Warrant Met hour Approach 85th percentile must be Warrant not 2.1.2 equal or lower than 40 >40 mph Speed mph met Proposed location must Nearest be further than 250 feet 800 feet from controlled 2.1.3 Controlled from the nearest pedestrian crossing . Warrant Met Crossing controlled pedestrian crossing Must have an 2.1.4 Visibility unrestricted view (must NIA* NIA* Warrant meet stopping sight distance) Illumination Proposed location must Lighting to be provided Warrant to be 2.1.5 met with Warrant have lighting. with improvements improvements Accessibility Must have accessibility ADA access to be Warrant to be 2 .1.6 installed with met with Warrant to disabled pedestrian improvements improvements *The 85 th percentile speed on Kirkham Way is 46 mph. In the City council policy, stopping sight distance is not provided for 85 th percentile speed over 40 mph. Discussion The review of basic warrants result in the proposed marked crosswalk on Kirkham Way met five of total six basic warrants . Since the approach speed warrant is not met, an uncontrolled location cannot be considered for a marked crosswalk. A high level treatment is required, such as a pedestrian hybrid beacon or a pedestrian traffic signal. Since the approach speed warrant is not met, the marked crosswalk location may be considered with either a pedestrian traffic signal or a pedestrian hybrid beacon (HA WK). The following section evaluates the methodology and warrants to install a pedestrian traffic signal or a HA WK . 10 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Pedestrian Traffic Signal The analysis is based on the traffic signal warrant (Warrant 4) contained in Chapter 4C, "Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies," of the 2012 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD). The need for a midblock pedestrian traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of the following criteria are met for a street with speeds over 40 mph: A. For each of any 4 hours of an average day, the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding pedestrians per hour crossing the major street (total of all crossings) all fall above the curve in Figure 4C-6 . Table 2 shows that the fourth highest hour is 180 vehicles and 13 pedestrians. Fig ure 4C-6 . Wa rrant 4 , Pedestr ian Fo ur -H our Volu m e (70'% Fa ct or) 4.0r. J 31>D TOt l\L O F ALL P EDES RI M S CR OSSING M AJO R ST REE--20D P EO ES Rl l\NG ...... "'~ ~ I I ~ I f'ER HO UR (P PH ) !'--. 11 of 51 10 c I I I ~ ...... (180 , 13 I I "2 CO 8[10 500 0 0 0 70 0 ';!OD MA JOR STREET-TO TAL OF BOTH A.PPF10 A.C H ES-- VEHI CL ES PE R HOU R (VF'H ) 'Noto : 75 pµtl ap;::,li 9G as It O IOI £r U11~110 lll VCIJl1'0 . 1CO O B. For 1 hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day , the plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street ( total of both approaches) and the corresponding pedestrians per hour crossing the major street (total of all crossings) falls above the curve in Figure 4C-8 . Table 2 shows that the peak hour is 215 vehicles and 38 pedestrians. March 17, 2020, Item #9 Figure 4C•8. Wairrant 4, Pedestrian Peak Hour (70% Factor) 50 0 TOTAL OF AU.. PEDESTRIANS 3 0D CROSSING M~JO R STA EET• PEDESTR:I.ANS 200 PER HOUR (PPH) 100 * ......... "' (215 , 38) I I ~ "I'--. r--... --r--... r--L ~0 0 3(X1 -~ ill 5 0~• 1-.0 11 7(10 {l[:(1 fll)I) 1 ~O(l 1 1 [.t i 1200 M AJOR STREET TOTi\L OF BOTH APPR01\CHES \JE HI CL::S IPEFl HOUrl (VPH) If Warrant is met and a traffic control signal is justified by an engineering study, the traffic control signal shall be equipped with pedestrian signal heads complying with provisions set forth in Chapter 4E of the MUTCD. Assessment As shown in Figure 4C-6/Figure 4C-8, the combination of the vehicular volume and pedestrian volume fell well below the threshold to meet the warrants. Therefore, warrant 4 is not satisfied for a pedestrian traffic signal. Pedestrian Beacon Signal (HA WK) The analysis is based on the pedestrian hybrid beacons contained in Chapter 4F, "Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies," of the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD). A pedestrian hybrid beacon may be considered for installation to facilitate pedestrian crossings at a location that does not meet traffic signal warrants (see Chapter 4C), or at a location that meets traffic signal warrants under Sections 4C.05 and/or 4C.06 but a decision is made to not install a traffic control signal. A The need for a pedestrian hybrid beacon at an intersection or midblock shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of five criteria are met. Only section D is applicable to the project. D. For a major street where the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th- percentile speed exceeds 35 mph, the need for a pedestrian hybrid beacon should be considered if the engineering study finds that the plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding total of all pedestrians crossing the major street for 1 hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an 12 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 average day falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4F-2 for the length of the crosswalk. Table 2 shows that the peak hour is 215 vehicles and 3 8 pedestrians . Assessment The installation of a HAWK at Kirkham Way is evaluated using Figure 4F-2 of MUTCD Chapter 4F for the roadways with speed greater than 35 mph. Fig ure• 4F -2. Guide lin es fo r the In stalla t ion of Pede stria n Hy brid Beacons o n High-Speed Roadways Speeds of more t han 35 mph 500 ~-------'---------'------ I \ I , J .... ,,,,.,,,,. TOTA L OF ALL sr,o PE DESTRI ANS C ROSS ING I THE M AJO R STR EET · PEDESTRIA NS PE R HOUR (PPH} 21.'□ 100 '< ( * M AJOR STR f.ET - TOTAL. O F BOTH A PPRO ACH ES - V EHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) ' ·t,."u,\,:,: 2-0 pph 41 p li es ;L!.l 111 ij 10'/l ilr u,resllold ','-O IIUl"iltl' Plotting the point on Figure 4F-2 for the total of all pedestrian crossings of the major street (38 pedestrian per hour) and the total vehicular volume for both approached of the Kirkham Way (215 vehicles per hour) with a total crossing distance of 64 feet indicates that the HAWK is not justified. Recommendations The vehicular volumes and pedestrian volumes are too low to warrant a HA WK or pedestrian signal. The vehicular speeds are too high to allow a marked crosswalk without additional treatments. These treatments are outlined in Attachment B . From this list, we recommend the following additional treatments to supplement a marked crosswalk. • Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB's) activated by pedestrian buttons and/or passive motion sensors, • In-pavement flashers activated simultaneously with the RRFB's, 13 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 • A marked crosswalk with the continental striping patterns, • Pedestrian crossing warning signs on both approaches • Pedestrian Ramps Conclusion The existing pedestrian volumes and vehicular volumes are too low to meet the warrants for a HA WK or a pedestrian signal. Kirkham Way is too wide and the traffic speeds too high to justify a stripped crosswalk as a stand alone treatment. There is a need for General Atomics employees to cross Kirkham Way . Doing nothing and letting employees cross in random locations seems irresponsible . Given these facts , it is recommended that a marked pedestrian crossing with Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacon's be installed with the additional features listed in the previous section . cc : File 14 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Figure 1 15 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 ... O'\ 0 .... V, ... LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN engineers N:\3001\Figures Figure 1 Project Area Map KIRKHAM WAY CROSSWALK STUDY March 17, 2020, Item #9 Attachment A 17 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 ..... Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 00 0 4542 Ruffner Street, Suite 100, San Diego , CA 92111 .... U'I ..... Average Daily Traffic Location: Kirkham Way, West of General Atomics Way Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 Total Daily Volume: 2892 Descrietion: Total Volume 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6 :00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 I 1:00 12 :00 13 :00 14:00 15 :00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19 :00 20:00 21:00 22 :00 23:00 4 4 1 2 15 54 139 170 152 129 155 212 216 181 247 304 327 255 192 65 38 23 4 3 3 1 0 0 2 8 29 43 43 36 25 44 56 44 48 65 103 77 59 22 13 10 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 8 43 40 52 25 38 53 59 42 50 69 74 59 40 18 9 5 I 0 1 1 I 0 1 9 25 41 31 36 42 65 46 41 89 93 78 62 57 17 8 4 0 2 0 0 0 2 12 29 42 46 26 32 50 50 55 54 60 77 72 57 36 8 8 4 I 0 Date : Tuesday, March 19, 2019 Total Daily Volume : 1609 Descrietion: Eastbound Volume 0 :00 1:00 2 :00 3 :00 4 :00 5:00 6 :00 7 :00 8:00 9 :00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16 :00 17 :00 18:00 19 :00 20 :00 21:00 22 :00 23:00 3 4 1 I 4 10 37 65 65 49 74 92 108 111 169 240 236 150 112 36 27 11 2 2 2 I 0 0 2 0 9 10 17 12 14 17 20 28 30 48 85 48 35 13 8 5 2 I 0 2 0 0 0 I 13 15 20 8 20 23 36 27 25 48 43 34 22 11 6 3 0 0 1 I I 0 0 2 7 19 13 15 18 23 23 22 75 79 60 38 37 8 5 I 0 0 0 0 1 2 7 8 21 15 14 22 29 29 34 39 65 48 30 18 4 8 2 0 0 Date : Tuesday, March 19, 2019 Total Daily Volume : 1283 Descrietion: Westbound Volume 0 :00 1 :00 2 :00 3:00 4 :00 5:00 6 :00 7 :00 8:00 9 :00 10:00 I 1:00 12 :00 13:00 14 :00 15 :00 16 :00 17 :00 18 :00 19 :00 20 :00 21 :00 22 :00 23 :00 0 0 I 11 44 102 105 87 80 81 120 108 70 78 64 91 105 80 29 11 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 8 20 33 26 24 11 27 36 16 18 17 18 29 24 9 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 30 25 32 17 18 30 23 15 25 21 31 25 18 7 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 18 22 18 21 24 42 23 19 14 14 18 24 20 9 3 3 0 I 0 0 0 I 10 22 34 25 11 18 28 21 26 20 21 12 24 27 18 4 0 2 I 0 Report Generated by "Count Data" all r ights reserved March 17, 2020, Item #9 ..... \0 0 .... u, ..... Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 4542 Ruffner Street, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92111 Average Daily Traffic Location: Kirkham Way, West of General Atomics Way Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 Total Daily Volume: 2937 Descrietion: Total Volume 0 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21 :00 22:00 23:00 3 6 3 3 17 68 144 151 156 125 180 207 215 202 273 267 333 252 206 55 30 24 9 8 2 3 2 0 0 10 30 30 27 28 31 55 69 61 61 62 107 76 64 19 12 7 5 2 0 1 1 0 2 10 28 40 42 30 41 49 38 48 56 45 67 57 63 13 5 7 1 l 0 0 0 2 19 36 34 46 36 50 46 61 41 100 84 93 65 41 12 7 8 3 0 2 0 3 13 29 50 47 41 31 58 57 47 52 56 76 66 54 38 11 6 2 0 4 Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 Total Daily Volume: 1620 Descrietion: Eastbound Volume 0:00 1 :00 2 :00 3:00 4:00 5 :00 6 :00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10 :00 11:00 12 :00 13 :00 14:00 15 :00 16 :00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20 :00 21:00 22 :00 23:00 2 5 2 1 3 14 32 59 72 51 88 89 99 116 209 203 234 150 122 27 15 16 6 5 l 3 1 0 0 0 7 15 13 13 14 23 27 38 40 47 77 49 39 6 7 5 4 0 l l 0 I 2 6 12 21 10 24 19 23 21 41 35 48 32 34 8 3 5 0 0 0 I 9 7 14 22 14 22 23 32 28 80 66 72 42 25 7 3 5 1 0 l 0 I I 3 12 18 16 14 28 24 17 29 48 55 37 27 24 6 2 I 0 2 Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 Total Daily Volume: 1317 Descrietion: Westbound Volume 0:00 1:00 2:00 3 :00 4 :00 5:00 6 :00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10 :00 11:00 12 :00 13:00 14 :00 15:00 16 :00 17:00 18 :00 19 :00 20 :00 21:00 22 :00 23 :00 1 1 1 2 14 54 112 92 84 74 92 118 116 86 64 64 99 102 84 28 15 8 3 3 1 0 l 0 0 10 23 15 14 15 17 32 42 23 21 15 30 27 25 13 5 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 8 22 28 21 20 17 30 15 27 15 10 19 25 29 5 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 l 10 29 20 24 22 28 23 29 13 20 18 21 23 16 5 4 3 2 0 0 1 0 2 12 26 38 29 25 17 30 33 30 23 8 21 29 27 14 5 4 1 0 2 Report Generated by "Count Data" all rights reserved March 17, 2020, Item #9 tJ 0 0 .... VI ..... Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 4542 Ruffner Street, Suite 100 , San Diego, CA 92111 Average Daily Traffic Location: Kirkham Way, West of General Atomics Way Date : Thursday, March 21, 2019 Total Daily Volume: 2941 Descrietion: Total Volume 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6 :00 7:00 8:00 9 :00 10:00 11:00 12 :00 13:00 14:00 15 :00 16 :00 17:00 18:00 19 :00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23 :00 3 2 2 2 15 64 140 155 160 141 179 202 215 214 302 301 317 221 170 56 38 22 13 7 2 0 1 1 2 10 22 35 37 33 48 57 69 61 58 56 93 58 45 18 8 4 4 2 0 1 0 0 2 7 42 42 47 35 46 38 46 65 56 64 72 58 52 12 9 11 I 1 1 1 0 1 4 15 31 36 40 34 43 55 48 39 116 101 92 66 48 10 11 5 5 2 0 0 1 0 7 32 45 42 36 39 42 52 52 49 72 80 60 39 25 16 10 2 3 2 Date: Thursday, March 21, 2019 Total Daily Volume: 1639 Descrietion: Eastbound Volume 0:00 1:00 2 :00 3 :00 4 :00 5 :00 6 :00 7 :00 8 :00 9 :00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14 :00 15 :00 16 :00 17 :00 18 :00 19 :00 20:00 21:00 22 :00 23 :00 3 1 1 1 5 9 35 60 76 60 92 92 109 125 201 232 231 122 97 32 23 15 12 5 2 0 1 1 2 1 6 14 17 12 22 25 29 39 35 43 71 34 29 9 6 2 4 2 0 I 0 0 1 2 9 16 19 10 25 13 21 32 31 50 54 35 27 9 6 10 I 0 I 0 0 0 2 2 9 19 23 17 25 29 28 25 90 79 70 34 27 8 9 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 11 11 17 21 20 25 31 29 45 60 36 19 14 6 2 I 3 2 Date : Thursday, March 21, 2019 Total Daily Volume : 1302 Descrietion: Westbound Volume 0 :00 1:00 2 :00 3:00 4 :00 5 :00 6:00 7 :00 8 :00 9 :00 10:00 I 1:00 12 :00 13 :00 14 :00 15 :00 16 :00 17 :00 18 :00 19 :00 20:00 21 :00 22 :00 23:00 0 I 1 1 10 55 105 95 84 81 87 110 106 89 101 69 86 99 73 24 15 7 I 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 16 21 20 21 26 32 40 22 23 13 22 24 16 9 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 5 33 26 28 25 21 25 25 33 25 14 18 23 25 3 3 I 0 0 I 0 1 2 13 22 17 17 17 18 26 20 14 26 22 22 32 21 2 2 3 I 1 0 0 1 0 7 28 34 31 19 18 22 27 21 20 27 20 24 20 11 10 8 I 0 0 Report Generated by "Count Data" all rights reserved March 17, 2020, Item #9 Speed Statistics by Hour Location: Kirkham Way, West of General Atomics Way Direction: Eastbound Volume Date Range: Tuesday March 19, 2019 Vehicles = 1609 Maximum= 75.5 mph, Minimum= 13.3 mph, Mean= 41.8 mph 85% Speed= 49.49 mph, 95% Speed= 54.11 mph, Median= 42.84 mph Hour Bins Time Bin Min Max Mean Median 85% 95% 0000 3 0.186% 45.9 47.7 46.5 46.1 47.7 47.7 0100 4 0.249% 22.0 42.7 31. 9 31. 4 42.7 42.7 0200 1 0.062% 41. 9 41. 9 41. 9 41. 9 41. 9 41. 9 0300 1 0.062% 43.7 43.7 43.7 43.7 43.7 43.7 0400 4 0.249% 25.4 52.1 35.7 32.7 52.1 52.1 0500 10 0.622% 20.5 48.3 40.7 43.3 47.4 48.3 0600 37 2.300% 20.8 54.7 38.8 38.0 49.7 52.8 0700 65 4.040% 17.5 54.0 38.4 39.2 45.3 48.5 0800 65 4.040% 13.3 53.5 37.5 39.2 45.9 50.8 0900 49 3.045% 15.8 48.8 37.4 38.8 45.1 48.1 1000 74 4.599% 21. 4 59.7 39.2 40.5 47.8 52.1 1100 92 5.718% 15.4 51. 2 38.4 39.6 46.0 49.4 1200 108 6.712% 17.0 54.3 38.8 40.8 46.1 48.9 1300 111 6.899% 16.3 66.3 39.6 40.7 46.5 52.3 1400 169 10.50% 20.0 61. 0 43.7 45.1 50.1 53.4 1500 240 14.92% 18.2 64.0 43.4 44.0 50.4 54.5 1600 236 14.67% 22.4 67.7 44.4 45.2 51. 5 56.8 1700 150 9.323% 18.0 74.4 43.7 45.2 50.5 54.9 1800 112 6.961% 22.9 61. 5 43.4 44.8 52.0 58.0 1900 36 2.237% 25.6 57.7 42.3 41. 7 50.2 54.6 2000 27 1.678% 30.3 57.6 44.6 45.3 51. 8 57.0 2100 11 0.684% 28.0 54.1 40.3 42.8 51. 8 54.1 2200 2 0.124% 58.8 75.5 67.1 67.1 75.5 75.5 2300 2 0.124% 37.4 43.2 40.3 40.3 43.2 43.2 1609 100.0% 13.3 75.5 41. 8 42.8 49.5 54.1 21 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Speed Statistics by Hour Location: Kirkham Way, West of General Atomics Way Direction: Westbound Volume Date Range: Tuesday March 19, 2019 Vehicles = 1283 Maximum = 69 .1 mph, Minimum= 9.2 mph, Mean= 35.0 mph 85% Speed= 44.07 mph, 95% Speed= 48.82 mph, Median= 36.01 mph Hour Bins Time Bin Min Max Mean Median 85% 95% 0000 1 0.078% 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 0100 0 0.000% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0200 0 0.000% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0300 1 0.078% 24.3 24.3 24.3 24.3 24.3 24.3 0400 11 0.857% 39.6 58.4 43.7 42.7 48.6 58.4 0500 44 3.429% 13.2 61. 5 38.4 38.7 47.2 52.8 0600 102 7.950% 18.9 64.0 39.3 39.3 48.8 53.4 0700 105 8.184% 13.2 69.1 37.8 40.4 47.9 55.7 0800 87 6.781% 14.6 63.5 34.2 36.2 44.3 49.3 0900 80 6.235% 13.7 54.3 32.8 33.3 42.6 48.9 1000 81 6. 313% 14.9 56.1 34.7 35.9 43.2 47.9 1100 120 9.353% 15.0 47.3 34.1 34.7 41. 5 45.8 1200 108 8.418% 14.5 48.0 30.9 33.2 40.2 43.9 1300 70 5.456% 12.5 49.9 30.8 30.5 40.3 46.1 1400 78 6.080% 13.5 48.8 33.2 35.7 41. 0 45.2 1500 64 4.988% 1 3 .5 50.3 33.8 33.0 44.9 48.6 1600 91 7.093% 20.4 56.5 37.9 38.2 45.0 50.2 1700 105 8.184% 9.2 52.5 36.7 37.1 44.4 49.4 1800 80 6.235% 14.6 58.1 34.1 33.8 41. 4 47.5 1900 29 2.260% 20.1 59.2 36.6 35.2 45.3 54.7 2000 11 0.857% 27.8 43.5 37.8 39.0 43.2 43.5 2100 1 2 0.935% 12.8 51. 5 30.4 30.6 37.7 51. 5 2200 2 0.156% 34.5 47.9 41. 2 41. 2 47.9 47.9 2300 1 0.078% 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 1283 100.0% 9.2 69.1 35.0 36.0 44.1 48.8 22 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Speed Statistics by Hour Location: Kirkham Way, West of General Atomics Way Direction: Eastbound Volume Date Range: Wednesday March 20, 2019 Vehicles = 1620 Maximum = 81.6 mph, Minimum = 10.0 mph, Mean= 41.0 mph 85% Speed= 48.88 mph, 95% Speed= 53.35 mph, Median = 41.80 mph Hour Bins Time Bin Min Max Mean Median 85% 95% 0000 2 0.123% 45.8 51. 5 48.7 48.7 51. 5 51. 5 0100 5 0.309% 21. 3 62.7 39.8 41. 7 62.7 62.7 0200 2 0.123% 37.4 48.2 42.8 42.8 48.2 48.2 0300 1 0.062% 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 0400 3 0.185% 29.1 45.8 37 .7 38.3 45.8 45.8 0500 14 0.864% 28.7 46.6 38.9 39.2 45.9 46.6 0600 32 1.975% 16.1 55.3 37.3 39.2 4 6. 8 54.6 0700 59 3.642% 21. 2 53.1 39.1 40.0 44.8 50.6 0800 72 4.444% 22.8 50.5 37.6 39.3 46.3 48.7 0900 51 3.148% 10.0 49.1 33.5 34.2 42.3 46.0 1000 88 5.432% 15.8 50.1 35.0 36.0 42.4 44.0 1100 89 5.494% 11. 4 48.7 36.5 37.3 44.2 46.4 1200 99 6.111% 12.5 58.5 37.7 38.3 44.2 47.5 1300 116 7.160% 17.7 53.0 39.8 40.7 46.8 49.0 1400 209 12.90% 19.0 59.2 40.7 41. 9 47.9 53.5 1500 203 12.53 % 23.2 60.9 42.3 42.3 49.0 52.6 1600 234 14.44% 22.9 65.7 43.6 44.7 50.4 54.5 1700 150 9.259% 19.9 61. 6 45.0 46.0 52.6 57.1 1800 122 7.531% 24.9 81. 6 46.0 47.2 52.9 58.6 1900 27 1. 667% 30.0 59.0 44.3 45.5 51.1 57.6 2000 15 0.926% 20.9 53.6 43.8 45.9 51. 9 53.6 2100 16 0.988% 25.5 57.9 44.5 45.5 53.6 57.9 2200 6 0.370% 33.2 60.1 47.1 47.3 59.7 60.1 2300 5 0.309% 15.8 77.9 47.2 47.3 77.9 77.9 1620 100.0% 10.0 81. 6 41. 0 41. 8 48.9 53.4 23 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Speed Statistics by Hour Location: Kirkham Way, West of General Atomics Way Direction: Westbound Volume Date Range: Wednesday March 20, 2019 Vehicles = 131 7 Maximum = 66 .6 mph, Minimum= 6.8 mph, Mean= 35.2 mph 85% Speed= 43.79 mph, 95% Speed= 49.21 mph, Median = 36.07 mph Hour Bins Time Bin Min Max Mean Median 85% 95% 0000 1 0.076% 41. 5 41. 5 41. 5 41. 5 41. 5 41. 5 0100 1 0.076% 33.6 33.6 33.6 33.6 33.6 33.6 0200 1 0.076% 36.7 36.7 36.7 36.7 36.7 36.7 0300 2 0.152% 35.4 36.2 35.8 35.8 36.2 36.2 0400 14 1. 063% 30.2 49.8 41.1 42.0 45.8 49.8 0500 54 4.100% 10.4 59.6 40.7 42.1 50.7 54.3 0600 112 8.504% 15.3 62.2 38.8 40.0 49.4 54.3 0700 92 6.986% 6.8 66.6 34.5 35.3 47.4 54.0 0800 84 6.378% 14.9 56.4 32.6 35.0 42.2 44.9 0900 74 5.619% 13.2 50.7 33.1 35.8 42.3 46.8 1000 92 6.986% 15.3 55.2 34.4 35.0 42.4 49.4 1100 118 8.960% 13. 0 49.4 33.6 34.8 41. 3 44.5 1200 116 8.808% 17.6 50.4 33.4 33.2 42.5 46.9 1300 86 6.530% 8.0 49.2 33.7 34.2 44.0 47.0 1400 64 4.860% 15.8 48.7 33.2 33.4 42.4 44.5 1500 64 4.860% 11. 4 48.3 34.7 36.6 42.6 45.5 1600 99 7.517 % 14.7 55.2 36.7 36.7 43.4 49.8 1700 102 7.745% 18.8 58.1 36.7 36.8 44.0 49.0 1800 84 6.378% 20.0 62.6 37.2 37.5 43.1 52.0 1900 28 2.126% 21. 5 60.0 35.7 34.5 44.4 57.0 2000 15 1. 139% 15.3 44.6 31. 3 34.3 39.8 44.6 2100 8 0.607% 21. 6 45.5 31. 4 31. 6 42.0 45.5 2200 3 0.228% 33.2 38.6 36.7 38.3 38.6 38.6 2300 3 0.228% 10.1 45.0 31. 7 40.0 45.0 45.0 1317 100.0% 6.8 66.6 35.2 36.1 43.8 49.2 24 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Speed Statistics by Hour Location: Kirkham Way, West of General Atomics Way Direction: Eastbound Volume Date Range: Thursday March 21, 2019 Vehicles= 1639 Maximum = 75 .1 mph, Minimum = 11.6 mph, Mean= 39.9 mph 85% Speed= 47.53 mph, 95% Speed= 51.62 mph, Median= 40.77 mph Hour Bins Time Bin Min Max Mean Median 85% 95% 0000 3 0.183% 41. 7 48.5 44.7 43.9 48.5 48.5 0100 1 0.061% 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 0200 1 0.061% 28.8 28.8 28.8 28.8 28.8 28.8 0300 1 0.061% 40.9 40.9 40.9 40.9 40.9 40.9 0400 5 0.305% 25.9 39.6 33.0 33.3 39.6 39.6 0500 9 0.549% 16.4 48.1 40.2 43.5 46.9 48.1 0600 35 2.135% 17.5 57.2 39.9 40.8 49.2 56.8 0700 60 3.661% 23.1 54.5 39.9 41. 0 46.2 51. 3 0800 76 4.637% 12.3 62. 9 38.9 40.0 47.6 53.1 0900 60 3.661% 16.6 49.9 33.7 34.3 43.3 47.6 1000 92 5. 613% 17. 5 57.0 38.2 39.0 46.0 52.8 1100 92 5. 613% 14.5 55.0 36.1 37.4 44.0 48.2 1200 109 6.650% 12.9 53.5 38.8 40.4 45.5 48.0 1300 125 7.627% 15.7 52.3 37.5 38.6 45.6 47.7 1400 201 12.26% 15.2 62.4 40.9 41. 9 47.8 51. 6 1500 232 14.15% 11. 6 63.4 40.6 41. 6 47.9 50.8 1600 231 14.09% 19.8 75.1 42.0 42.7 48.5 51. 9 1700 122 7.444% 15.5 60.4 41. 7 42.6 50.7 54.1 1800 97 5.918% 26.6 67.3 42.0 42.3 49.7 55.8 1900 32 1.952% 27.4 63.8 42.7 42.3 51. 2 59.3 2000 23 1.403% 17.0 59.2 39.3 38.4 50 .3 58.1 2100 15 0.915% 26. 5 59.8 42.1 42.5 50.5 59.8 2200 12 0.732% 33.1 55.0 44.0 44.3 52.8 55.0 2300 5 0.305% 23.0 42.4 31. 3 27.6 42.4 42.4 1639 100.0% 11. 6 75.1 39.9 40.8 47.5 51. 6 25 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Speed Statistics by Hour Location: Kirkham Way, West of General Atomics Way Direction: Westbound Volume Date Range: Thursday March 21, 2019 Vehicles = 1302 Maximum= 61.9 mph, Minimum= 9.0 mph, Mean= 34 .8 mph 85% Speed= 44.29 mph, 95% Speed= 48 .99 mph, Median= 35.90 mph Hour Bins Time Bin Min Max Mean Median 85% 95% 0000 0 0.000% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .0 0.0 0.0 0100 1 0.077% 33.2 33 .2 33.2 33.2 33.2 33.2 0200 1 0.077% 52.3 52.3 52.3 52.3 52.3 52.3 0300 1 0.077% 24 .8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 0400 10 0.768% 33.0 56 .6 40.6 42 .0 48.5 56.6 0500 55 4.224% 13 .1 57.6 39.1 39.1 48.0 55.5 0600 105 8.065% 16.7 60.0 40.2 41. 9 48.9 54.9 0700 95 7 .296% 12.6 61. 9 36.4 37 .1 48.5 52.2 0800 84 6.452% 13.1 56.2 33.2 37.0 42.9 48 .9 0900 81 6.221% 11. 5 58.2 30.9 30.5 41. 3 48 .0 1000 87 6.682% 13 .1 52.1 33 .8 35.3 41. 2 48.0 1100 110 8.449% 16.2 50.3 34 .0 35.2 41. 7 47.0 1200 106 8.141% 10.3 52.3 32.1 33.8 42.1 48.7 1300 89 6.836% 15.0 52.0 31. 9 33 .1 40.4 44.5 1400 101 7.757% 13 . 9 51. 5 33.5 34.4 43.4 47.8 1500 69 5.300% 16.4 54.6 34 .7 36.2 43.8 47.6 1600 86 6.605% 18 .3 57.4 36.0 36 .0 45.1 48.3 1700 99 7.604% 17 .5 48.5 36.3 36 .8 42.8 46.2 1800 73 5.607% 10.4 58 .5 37.0 36.6 44.7 51. 4 1900 24 1. 843% 15.0 45.5 33.0 34 .9 41. 7 45 .1 2000 15 1 .152% 9.0 45.7 29.9 31. 7 42 .4 45.7 2100 7 0.538% 25.0 38 .7 31. 4 32.0 37.9 38.7 2200 1 0.077% 25 .9 25.9 25.9 25.9 25.9 25 .9 2300 2 0.154% 32 .2 39.8 36.0 36.0 39.8 39.8 1302 100.0% 9.0 61. 9 34 .8 35.9 44.3 49 .0 26 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Attachment B 27 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Attachment B Table 2: Crossing Treatment Threshold for Uncontrolled Marked Crosswalks if Warrants are Met Crosswalk Distance 2 Roadway ADT (vehicles per day) <1,500 1,501-5,000 5,001-12,000 12,001-15,000 >15,001 <40' A B B C C I D1 40' TO 52' A B C C I D1 D >52' A B I C C I D1 D D 1 For streets with more than one lane at an approach or posted speed limit 30 mph or greater. 2. Crossing distance can be measured to a pedestrian refuge island if one is greater Source: City of San Diego Council Policy 200-07 Table 3: Crossing Treatments for Uncontrolled Marked Crosswalks if Warrants are Met Category Crossing Treatments The following is required: A • (Wll-2) Pedestrian Warning Signage with the corresponding (W16-7P) arrow plaque as shown in CA MUTCD Section 2C.50 At least one of the following is required: • (Rl-6) State Law -Yield to Pedestrian sign if median is present B • Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) 0 Raised crosswalk or other traffic calming treatments if the City of San Diego's Traffic Calming Guidelines are met At least two of the following are required : • Radar Speed Feedback Signs 0 Striping changes such as narrower lanes, painted medians, road diets, or C other speed reducing treatments. • RRFBs • Staggered crosswalks and pedestrian refuge island 0 Horizontal deflection traffic calming treatmentsl if the City of San Diego's Traffic Calming Guidelines are met A Traffic Signal is required if the CA MUTCD warrants are met and it is recommended by a traffic engineering study. Otherwise at least one of the following is required : D • Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon if the CA MUTCD warrants are met 0 Horizontal deflection traffic calming treatmentl with RRFBs if the City of San Diego's Traffic Calming Guidelines are met 1. Horizontal deflection treatments include, but are not limited to: roundabouts, pedestrian refuge islands, and pedestrian pop-outs . Source: City of San Diego Council Policy 200-07 28 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 To: From: Mr. Nirav Desai General Atomics John P. Keating, P .E. Kamal Bhayal LLG, Engineers Date: April 18, 2019 LLG Ref: 3-19-3088 Subject: Evaluation of controlled pedestrian crossing on Stowe Drive The following memorandum has been prepared to evaluate and determine if the proposed controlled pedestrian crosswalk to be located on Stowe Drive between Kirkham Way and Scripps Poway Parkway satisfies the criteria used by public agencies. The warrant analysis is based on the warrants described in the City of San Diego Council Policy 200-07. Figure 1 shows the vicinity map. Existing Conditions: Effective evaluation of the midblock crosswalk requires an understanding of the current conditions in the vicinity. The following is a brief discussion of the existing conditions on Stowe Drive: Stowe Drive is classified as a Business Park Collector in the City of Poway General Plan and is constructed as a four-lane roadway with a center two-way left-tum lane (TWL TL). The roadway is 64-foot wide including curb and gutter. No bike lanes are provided and on-street parking is prohibited. Contiguous sidewalks exist on both sides of Stowe Drive. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. For the purpose of this study, LLG collected 24-hour Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts and a speed survey for three consecutive weekdays on Stowe Drive where the crosswalk is proposed. Attachment A contains the recent traffic data, such as speed surveys and vehicular/pedestrian counts. The data are summarized in the Table 1 and Table 2. TABLE 1 TRAFFIC COUNTS SUMMARY Date ADT 85% Speed (mph) NB SB Combined NB SB Average Tuesday, April 2, 2019 2,934 2,910 5,844 35.6 39.2 37.4 Wednesday, April 3, 2019 2,754 2,828 5,582 35.2 38.9 37.1 Thursday, April 4, 2019 2,749 2,772 5,521 35.3 39.0 37.2 3-Day Average 2,812 2,837 5,649 35.4 39.0 37.2 29 of 51 ATTACHMENT E LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN engineers Engineers & Planners Traffic Transportation Parking Linscott. Law & Greenspan, Engineers 4542 Ruffner Street Suite 100 San Diego , CA 92111 858 .300.8800 T 858.300.88 JO F www.llgengineers.com Pasadena Irvine San Diego Woodland Hills March 17, 2020, Item #9 Hour Begin 10AM 11 AM 12 Noon 1 PM TOTAL TABLE2 PEDESTRIAN VOLUME DATA Major Street (both Total Pedestrian Crossing approaches) the Ma_jor Street 306 93 381 83 426 69 345 50 1,458 vehicles 295 pedestrians The recorded traffic level for Stowe Drive was (average of three days) 5,649 ADT. The 85 th percentile speed on Stowe Drive revealed that the northbound and the southbound 85 th percentile speed (average of three days) is 35.4 mph and 39.0 mph, respectively. The accident history was researched from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the most recent five years (2013-2018) on Stowe Drive within study area. No collisions were noted in the last five years on Stowe Drive between Scripps Way Parkway and Kirkham Way. Warrant Analysis The City of San Diego pedestrian crosswalk guidelines (Council Policy 200-07) provide a methodical approach to analyze pedestrian crossing locations for the installation of marked pedestrian crosswalk. These guidelines were selected because they are more comprehensive than what the City of Poway has. The Council Policy 200-07 proposes two warrants system, a basic warrants and point warrants. The basis warrant outlines 6 warrants and a point warrant system with a total 3 8 possible points. A location must satisfy all basic warrants and a minimum 16 points in the point warrants in order to be considered a marked crosswalk. The policy also provides guidelines for crossing treatment once the proposed location satisfy all the warrants. The warrants per the City council policy are as follows: 30 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Basic Warrants: Warrant Policy# Description Requirements Measured Result Pedestrian Must be equal or greater 93 Pedestrians ( 10 AM to 2.1.1 Volume than 10 Pedestrian per 11 AM) Warrant Met hour Approach 85th percentile must be 2.1.2 Speed equal or lower than 40 39 mph Warrant met mph Proposed location must Nearest be further than 250 feet 350 feet from controlled 2.1.3 Controlled from the nearest pedestrian crossing. Warrant Met Crossing controlled pedestrian crossing Must have an 2 .1.4 Visibility unrestricted view (must >300 feet Warrant Met Warrant meet 300 feet stopping sight distance for 40mph) Illumination Proposed location must Lighting to be provided Warrant to be 2.1.5 met with Warrant have lighting. with improvements improvements Accessibility Must have accessibility ADA access to be Warrant to be 2 .1.6 installed with met with Warrant to disabled pedestrian improvements improvements Point Warrants: Tl.1 a Pedestrian Volume Warrant Total Total Points Available Points Number of Pedestrians (Peak Hour) Points scored Points Scored 10-25 4 26-50 8 51+ 10 10 10 10 Tl.lb Latent Pedestrian Demand Warrant (in lieu of Pedestrian Volume Warrant) Total Total Points Available Points Condition Points scored Points Scored The proposed crosswalk is in a commercial, mixed land Not use, or high density residential area. 3 10 used 31 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 A pedestrian or shared use path is interrupted by a restricted crossing. 3 A pedestrian attractor/generator is directly adjacent to the proposed crosswalk as defined in the explanatory notes below. 4 Tl.2 General Condition Warrant Total Total Points Available Points Condition Points scored Points Scored The nearest controlled crossing is greater than 300 feet from the proposed crosswalk. 3 3 The proposed crosswalk will position pedestrians to be better seen by motorists. 3 The proposed crosswalk will establish a mid-block crossing between adjacent signalized intersections or it will connect an existing pedestrian path. 3 3 The proposed crosswalk is located within 1/4 mile of pedestrian attractors/generators as defined in the explanatory notes below. 3 An existing bus stop is located within 100 feet for the proposed crosswalk . 3 Other factors 3 18 6 Tl.3 Gap Time Warrant Total Total Average Number of Vehicular Gaps per Five-Minute Points Available Points Period Points scored Points Scored 0-0.99 0 1-1.99 1 2-2.99 8 3-3 .99 10 4-4 .99 8 5-5.99 1 6 or over 0 10 0 38 16 Discussion The review of basic warrants and point warrants result in the proposed marked crosswalk on Stowe Drive met all six basic warrants and scored 16 points (minimum required 16 points) from point warrants. Since all the warrants are met, proposed crosswalk location is considered for a marked crosswalk. A marked crosswalk 32 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 should be supplemented with appropriate crossing treatments. The City of San Diego council policy provided crossing treatment thresholds and crossing treatment based on vehicle volumes, vehicle speeds , and pedestrian crossing distance. Table 3 contains crossing treatment threshold and Table 4 contains the crossing treatments. Table 3: Crossing Treatment Threshold for Uncontrolled Marked Crosswalks if Warrants are Met Crosswalk Distance2 Roadway ADT (vehicles per day) <1,500 1,501-5,000 5,001-12,000 12,001-15,000 >15 ,001 <40' A B B C C I o' 40' TO 52' A B C C I o' D >52' A B I C C I D' D D 1. For streets with more than one lane at an approach or posted speed limit 30 mph or greater. 2 . Crossing distance can be measured to a pedestrian refuge island if one is greater Source: City of San Diego Council Policy 200-07 33 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Table 4: Crossing Treatments for Uncontrolled Marked Crosswalks if Warrants are Met Cate2orv Crossin2 Treatments The following is required: A • (WI 1-2) Pedestrian Warning Signage with the corresponding (Wl6-7P) arrow plaque as shown in CA MUTCD Section 2C.50 At least one of the following is required: • (R 1-6) State Law -Yield to Pedestrian sign if median is present B • Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) 0 Raised crosswalk or other traffic calming treatments if the City of San Diego's Traffic Calming Guidelines are met At least two of the following are required: • Radar Speed Feedback Signs 0 Striping changes such as narrower lanes, painted medians, road C diets, or other speed reducing treatments . • RRFBs • Staggered crosswalks and pedestrian refuge island 0 Horizontal deflection traffic calming treatments 1 if the City of San Diego's Traffic Calming Guidelines are met A Traffic Signal is required if the CA MUTCD warrants are met and it is recommended by a traffic engineering study. Otherwise at least one of the D following is required: • Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon if the CA MUTCD warrants are met 0 Horizontal deflection traffic calming treatment 1 with RRFBs if the City of San Diego's Traffic Calming Guidelines are met 1. Horizontal deflection treatments include, but are not limited to: roundabouts, pedestrian refuge islands, and pedestrian pop-outs . Source: City of San Diego Council Policy 200-07 Based on thresholds provided in Table 3, the proposed location qualifies for Category C and Category D 1 crossing treatments. Based on crossing treatments provided in Table 4, we recommend the following additional treatments to supplement a marked crosswalk. • Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB' s) activated by pedestrian buttons and/or passive motion sensors, • In-pavement flashers activated simultaneously with the RRFB's, • A marked crosswalk with the continental striping patterns, • Pedestrian crossing warning signs on both approaches, • Raised pedestrian refuge island in the median 34 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 It should be noted that the basic warrants are met on a condition to improve ADA accessibility and proper illumination. The marked crosswalk should be supplemented with ADA pedestrian ramps on both approaches and street lights. cc : File 35 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Figure 1 36 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 I N\3088\Figures :. ; " of51 Project Location Figure 1 Project Area Map STOWE DRIVE CROSSWALK STUDY March 17, 2020, Item #9 Attachment A 38 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 w \D 0 .... U1 ~ Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 4542 Ruffner Street, Suite 100 , San Diego, CA 92111 Average Daily Traffic Location: Stowe Drive, South of Scripps Poway Pkwy Date: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 Total Daily Volume : 5844 Description : Total Volume 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10 :00 I 1:00 12 :00 13 :00 14 :00 15 :00 16 :00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20 :00 21:00 22 :00 23 :00 181 38 9 16 303 207 298 363 342 300 283 422 492 414 648 346 377 315 228 128 56 35 19 24 59 17 4 I 26 59 67 83 94 92 79 79 119 101 110 104 119 87 62 46 17 12 6 6 11 5 2 2 43 56 78 82 99 71 67 94 108 101 122 75 78 76 59 28 14 4 8 3 99 11 I 4 90 46 79 102 73 66 74 119 136 104 292 91 94 84 62 43 19 11 3 12 12 5 2 9 144 46 74 96 76 71 63 130 129 108 124 76 86 68 45 11 6 8 2 3 Date: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 Total Daily Volume : 2934 Description: Northbound Volume 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 I 1:00 12:00 13 :00 14 :00 15:00 16 :00 17:00 18:00 19 :00 20 :00 21:00 22 :00 23:00 179 36 5 0 15 14 51 64 95 116 134 233 254 209 400 248 281 244 169 81 41 28 17 20 59 16 3 0 2 I 8 11 14 32 38 46 70 49 60 74 88 67 52 27 12 12 5 2 11 5 I 0 0 3 13 18 34 26 33 58 59 51 68 57 57 59 40 17 8 3 8 3 98 11 I 0 6 4 17 19 24 26 28 67 64 56 211 68 78 68 44 31 16 7 2 12 11 4 0 0 7 6 13 16 23 32 35 62 61 53 61 49 58 50 33 6 5 6 2 3 Date : Tuesday, April 2, 2019 Total Daily Volume: 2910 Descrietion: Southbound Volume 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10 :00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16 :00 17:00 18 :00 19 :00 20 :00 21:00 22:00 23:00 2 2 4 16 288 193 247 299 247 184 149 189 238 205 248 98 96 71 59 47 15 7 2 4 0 1 1 I 24 58 59 72 80 60 41 33 49 52 50 30 31 20 10 19 5 0 I 4 0 0 I 2 43 53 65 64 65 45 34 36 49 50 54 18 21 17 19 11 6 I 0 0 0 0 4 84 42 62 83 49 40 46 52 72 48 81 23 16 16 18 12 3 4 I 0 2 9 137 40 61 80 53 39 28 68 68 55 63 27 28 18 12 5 1 2 0 0 Report Generated by "Count Data" all rights reserved March 17, 2020, Item #9 .i::,. 0 0 ..... u, ~ Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 4542 Ruffner Street, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92111 Average Daily Traffic Location: Stowe Drive, South of Scripps Poway Pkwy Date: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 Total Daily Volume : 5582 Description: Total Volume 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 I 0:00 11 :00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16 :00 17:00 18 :00 19:00 20 :00 21:00 22 :00 23:00 172 37 5 15 310 237 291 342 335 238 306 381 426 345 665 353 377 276 213 122 49 47 17 23 48 19 1 3 20 85 69 97 84 68 79 84 128 84 126 109 116 93 71 42 16 13 5 2 13 10 3 2 41 46 73 70 70 40 76 75 88 69 124 85 68 67 55 30 14 8 8 3 95 7 1 4 91 61 74 83 93 47 66 113 106 88 289 76 116 65 47 36 8 14 2 12 16 1 0 6 158 45 75 92 88 83 85 109 104 104 126 83 77 51 40 14 11 12 2 6 Date : Wednesday, April 3, 2019 Total Daily Volume : 2754 Description: Northbound Volume 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12 :00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18 :00 19:00 20 :00 21:00 22 :00 23:00 170 35 4 0 18 12 41 61 87 94 155 194 213 168 412 241 271 224 152 89 37 39 16 21 48 19 1 0 1 1 8 18 14 19 38 46 61 45 59 79 81 76 56 32 11 13 5 1 13 9 3 0 1 2 9 14 20 13 35 44 48 28 69 52 46 56 37 18 11 7 7 3 94 6 0 0 2 6 12 13 20 19 33 58 63 47 211 54 85 53 31 31 6 10 2 12 15 1 0 0 14 3 12 16 33 43 49 46 41 48 73 56 59 39 28 8 9 9 2 5 Date: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 Total Daily Volume: 2828 DescriEtion: Southbound Volume 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15 :00 16 :00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22 :00 23:00 2 2 1 15 292 225 250 281 248 144 151 187 213 177 253 112 106 52 61 33 12 8 I 2 0 0 0 3 19 84 61 79 70 49 41 38 67 39 67 30 35 17 15 10 5 0 0 1 0 I 0 2 40 44 64 56 50 27 41 31 40 41 55 33 22 11 18 12 3 1 I 0 4 89 55 62 70 73 28 33 55 43 41 78 22 31 12 16 5 2 4 0 0 0 0 6 144 42 63 76 55 40 36 63 63 56 53 27 18 12 12 6 2 3 0 Report Generated by "Count Data" all rig hts reserved March 17, 2020, Item #9 :,. ..... 0 .... u, ..... Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 4542 Ruffner Street, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92111 Average Daily Traffic Location: Stowe Drive, South of Scripps Poway Pkwy Date: Thursday, April 4, 2019 Total Daily Volume : 5521 Description: Total Volume 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16 :00 17:00 18:00 19 :00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 193 30 3 21 299 224 293 347 310 255 281 407 441 354 625 366 362 259 166 140 41 54 24 26 48 16 0 1 17 63 65 87 81 56 76 83 123 97 109 113 99 72 47 43 6 18 12 3 27 9 3 3 35 49 75 84 73 62 69 92 98 78 127 84 80 70 38 38 13 11 5 3 100 5 0 3 100 57 67 85 70 79 66 123 115 76 272 99 91 69 45 34 9 16 5 15 18 0 0 14 147 55 86 91 86 58 70 109 105 103 117 70 92 48 36 25 13 9 2 5 Date : Thursday, April 4, 2019 Total Daily Volume: 2749 Descrietion: Northbound Volume 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16 :00 17 :00 18:00 19:00 20 :00 21:00 22:00 23:00 186 28 2 0 13 15 46 69 70 98 149 235 220 161 410 263 276 189 127 82 25 42 19 24 47 16 0 0 2 1 10 15 19 15 40 44 66 38 68 81 75 62 39 30 3 17 11 3 26 7 2 0 1 4 11 18 8 23 33 56 45 34 75 58 63 51 28 20 6 9 3 3 97 5 0 0 2 4 11 15 16 39 36 84 56 32 207 79 71 42 35 23 3 12 4 14 16 0 0 0 8 6 14 21 27 21 40 51 53 57 60 45 67 34 25 9 13 4 I 4 Date: Thursday, April 4, 2019 Total Daily Volume: 2772 Descrietion: Southbound Volume 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12 :00 13 :00 14 :00 15:00 16 :00 17 :00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 7 2 1 21 286 209 247 278 240 157 132 172 221 193 215 103 86 70 39 58 16 12 5 2 0 0 I 15 62 55 72 62 41 36 39 57 59 41 32 24 10 8 13 3 1 1 0 1 2 1 3 34 45 64 66 65 39 36 36 53 44 52 26 17 19 10 18 7 2 2 0 3 0 0 3 98 53 56 70 54 40 30 39 59 44 65 20 20 27 10 11 6 4 2 0 0 14 139 49 72 70 59 37 30 58 52 46 57 25 25 14 11 16 0 5 Report Generated by "Count Data" all rights reserved March 17, 2020, Item #9 Speed Statistics by Hour Location: Stowe Drive, South of Scripps Poway Pkwy Direction: Northbound Volume Date Range: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 Vehicles = 2934 Maximum= 57.1 mph, Minimum = 8.8 mph, Mean = 28.8 mph 85% Speed = 35.61 mph, 95% Speed= 38.98 mph, Median= 29.02 mph Hour Bins: Time I Bin Min Max Mean Median 85% 95% I 0000 I 179 6.101% 15.0 46.8 25.0 23.3 30.6 34.1 0100 I 36 1. 227% 18.4 38.7 24.9 23.9 28.9 35.8 0200 5 0.170% 19.5 39.7 27.9 27.6 39.7 39.7 0300 0 0.000% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0400 15 0.511% 15.7 27.1 20.9 20.2 25.3 27.1 0500 14 0.477% 26.6 40.1 32.2 31. 7 36.6 40.1 0600 51 1.738% 10.7 55.2 26.4 27.6 36.0 39.1 0700 64 2.181% 10.2 39.2 27.3 29.7 35.4 37.7 0800 95 3.238% 12.4 45.0 27.5 26.5 34.6 37.2 0900 116 3.954% 9.8 43.1 28.0 28.9 33.9 38.1 1000 134 4.567% 10.4 57.1 29.8 30.1 36.5 41.1 1100 233 7.941 % 14.8 50.2 31. 4 31. 8 36.9 39.4 1200 254 8.657% 11. 4 43.6 29.4 30.6 35.4 38.7 1300 209 7.123 % 8. 8 48.9 30.2 30.8 36.0 40.9 1400 400 13. 63% 9.3 51. 2 25.7 25.6 31. 6 34.8 1500 248 8.453% 15.2 44.8 28.0 27.0 34.8 38.7 1600 281 9.577% 15.3 44.3 29.3 29.6 36.3 39.0 1700 244 8.316% 14.7 48.3 30.4 30.9 37.2 40.7 1800 169 5.760% 16.5 45.6 32.8 33.4 38.1 40.5 1900 81 2.761% 11. 9 45.8 29.5 30.1 36.0 39.1 2000 41 1. 397% 12.4 45.4 32.6 34.4 38.2 43.6 2100 28 0.954% 16.1 39.5 30 .1 32.2 38.0 39.3 2200 17 0.579% 14 .4 39.0 26.9 26. 8 37.3 39.0 2300 20 0.682% 13.8 39.7 26.6 26.8 30.6 39.6 2934 100.0% 8.8 57.1 28.8 29.0 35.6 39.0 42 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Speed Statistics by Hour Location: Stowe Drive, South of Scripps Poway Pkwy Direction: Southbound Volume Date Range: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 Vehicles= 2910 Maximum = 59.8 mph, Minimum= 6.7 mph, Mean= 29.8 mph 85% Speed= 39.20 mph, 95% Speed= 42.92 mph, Median= 32.16 mph Hour Bin: Time I Bin Min Max Mean Median 85% 95% I 0000 I 2 0.069% 17.8 20.8 19.3 19.3 20.8 20.8 0100 2 0.069% 20.4 22.4 21. 4 21. 4 22.4 22.4 0200 4 0.137% 14.1 33.1 22.3 21. 0 33.1 33.1 0300 16 0.550% 15.0 42.1 24.7 21. 0 36.3 42.1 0400 288 9.897 % 6.7 51. 7 23.6 20.7 34.5 38.9 0500 193 6.632% 11. 9 52.6 26.6 23.0 37.7 41. 6 0600 247 8.488% 13. 0 59.8 30.6 32.6 40.6 43.9 0700 299 10.27% 10.9 53.2 30.9 33.2 40.3 42.9 0800 247 8.488 % 8.8 59.4 32.7 34.6 40.7 45.2 0900 184 6.323% 8.0 46.9 31. 5 33.4 39.3 42.4 1000 149 5.120 % 11. 3 49.7 31. 5 33.7 38.9 42.7 1100 189 6.495 % 9.1 48.7 31. 2 33.2 39.7 43.4 1200 238 8.179% 11.1 55.9 30.1 32.2 38.1 41. 4 1300 205 7.045% 10.6 49.5 31. 7 34.2 39.8 42.5 1400 248 8.522 % 10.3 49.2 25.4 22.6 36.9 39.9 1500 98 3.368% 12.0 51.1 31. 9 34.0 41. 6 45.0 1600 96 3.299% 8.0 47.5 32.0 33.9 40.4 44.6 1700 71 2.440 % 8. 8 45.9 33.5 36.8 40.8 43.6 1800 59 2.027% 14.6 45.9 34.5 35.6 41. 3 45.1 1900 47 1.615% 17.2 43.9 30.6 32.2 38.0 43.0 2000 15 0.515% 13. 0 45.7 32.6 34.9 43.5 45.7 2100 7 0.241 % 11. 8 44.3 28.3 27.3 43.6 44.3 2200 2 0.069 % 17.5 50.6 34.1 34.1 50.6 50.6 2300 4 0. 137% 12.5 18.2 16.1 16.8 18.2 18.2 2910 100.0% 6.7 59.8 29.8 32.2 39.2 42.9 43 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Speed Statistics by Hour Location: Stowe Drive, South of Scripps Poway Pkwy Direction: Northbound Volume Date Range: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 Vehicles= 2754 Maximum = 54.6 mph, Minimum = 6.2 mph, Mean= 28.2 mph 85% Speed= 35.23 mph, 95% Speed= 38.87 mph, Median= 28.41 mph Hour Bins: Time I Bin Min Max Mean Median 85% 95% I 0000 I 170 6.173% 15.9 38.4 24.5 23.1 30.1 34.4 0100 35 1.271 % 16.3 34.8 25.4 24.0 31. 8 33.4 0200 4 0.145% 19.5 35.9 23.6 19.6 35.9 35.9 0300 0 0.000% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0400 18 0.654% 13. 7 29.6 19.8 19.3 22.6 29.6 0500 12 0.436% 21. 7 38.3 31.1 30.7 36.5 38.3 0600 41 1.489% 11. 0 43.4 25.3 25.2 33.8 39.1 0700 61 2.215% 11.1 39.6 26.5 28.7 34.2 36.9 0800 87 3.159% 8.3 40.8 26.8 28.4 33.8 38.7 0900 94 3.413% 13.3 42.5 28.3 29.1 35.3 38.0 1000 155 5.628% 15.5 45.7 28.5 28.4 34.6 38.1 1100 194 7.044% 13. 0 54.6 30.8 30.9 37.1 40.8 1200 213 7.734% 12.9 44.3 29.4 30.5 35.6 38.1 1300 168 6.100% 9.5 44.9 28.8 30.0 35.6 39.2 1400 412 14.96 % 6.2 42.6 25.5 24.8 32.4 36.5 1500 241 8.751% 14.8 46.2 28.4 28.4 35.1 38.7 1600 271 9.840% 15.1 44.9 28.6 27.8 35.6 39.4 1700 224 8.134% 8.0 46.8 30.2 31. 3 36.5 40.0 1800 152 5.519% 16.8 45.6 31. 6 32.5 37.9 41. 2 1900 89 3.232% 14.0 46.7 29.9 29.3 37.3 40.4 2000 37 1.344 % 15.6 39.0 29.9 31. 4 35.2 37.0 2100 39 1. 416% 15.1 47.4 31.1 33.9 37.4 46.1 2200 16 0.581% 16.0 39.7 28.4 30.5 36.9 39.7 2300 21 0.763% 17. 9 39.4 27.4 26.1 35.9 39.3 2754 100.0% 6.2 54.6 28.2 28.4 35.2 38.9 44 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Speed Statistics by Hour Location: Stowe Drive , South of Scripps Poway Pkwy Direction: Southbound Volume Date Range: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 Vehicles = 2828 Maximum= 55.7 mph, Minimum = 6.6 mph, Mean= 29.5 mph 85% Speed= 38.87 mph, 95% Speed = 42.48 mph, Median= 31 .76 mph Hour Bins: Time I Bin Min Max Mean Median 85% 95% I 0000 I 2 0.071% 16.1 22.1 19.1 19.1 22.1 22.1 0100 2 0.071% 14.6 34.8 24.7 24.7 34.8 34.8 0200 1 0.035% 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 0300 15 0.530% 12.9 33.1 20.l 17. 3 32.2 33.1 0400 292 10.33 % 6.6 43.7 23.8 21. 3 33.4 37.6 0500 225 7.956% 6.7 49.7 26. 3 22.9 37.5 41. 0 0600 250 8.840% 14.5 52.1 31.1 33.6 39 .8 42.1 0700 281 9.936% 10.3 53.2 29.7 31. 8 37.9 41. 7 0800 248 8.769% 9.7 51. 7 32.2 33.6 39.6 43.6 0900 144 5.092% 11. 0 49.1 30.2 33.1 40.2 43.6 1000 151 5.339% 10.6 54.8 29.5 31. 6 37.4 42.5 1100 187 6.612% 11. 2 55.7 30 .9 32.5 38.3 41. 9 1200 213 7.532% 10.7 46.7 31. 7 33.2 39.0 41. 9 1300 177 6.259% 10.7 45.9 30.9 33.2 39.1 42.0 1400 253 8.946% 7.2 55.0 26.3 26.3 37.5 40.4 1500 112 3.960% 12.5 47.9 30.9 34.2 40.1 44.1 1600 106 3.748% 12.5 50.4 34.1 35.9 43.4 47.1 1700 52 1.839 % 10.5 47.4 32.5 34.7 42.0 45.2 1800 61 2.157% 14.6 53.3 35.9 36.2 44.6 48.7 1900 33 1.167% 15.3 45.4 30.3 31. 7 39.8 44.5 2000 12 0.424% 14.2 45.6 31. 6 31.1 43.0 45.6 2100 8 0.283% 13.3 40.1 29.8 31. 6 40.1 40.1 2200 1 0.035% 13.5 13.5 13. 5 13.5 13. 5 13. 5 2300 2 0.071% 35.4 43.1 39.2 39.2 43.1 43.1 2828 100.0% 6.6 55.7 29.5 31. 8 38.9 42.5 45 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Speed Statistics by Hour Location: Stowe Drive, South of Scripps Poway Pkwy Direction: Northbound Volume Date Range: Thursday, April 4, 2019 Vehicles= 2749 Maximum = 57 .2 mph, Minimum = 6.5 mph, Mean= 28.4 mph 85% Speed= 35.34 mph, 95% Speed= 38.84 mph, Median= 28.58 mph Hour Bins: Time I Bin Min Max Mean Median 85% 95% I 0000 I 18 6 6.766% 14.7 48.0 24.5 23.2 29.8 35.3 0100 28 1. 019% 18.0 34.5 25.6 26.2 30.0 32.7 0200 2 0.073% 21. 5 22.7 22.1 22.1 22.7 22.7 0300 0 0.000% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0400 13 0.473% 17.4 30.6 23.3 23.3 25.6 30.6 0500 15 0.546% 14.8 48.9 28.3 30.1 35.2 48.9 0600 46 1. 67 3% 13.2 46.5 29.6 30.0 36.6 41. 6 0700 69 2.510% 10.0 39.4 26. 0 28.1 34.2 37.4 0800 70 2.546% 6.5 40.9 26.0 26.6 35.1 37.8 0900 98 3.565% 9.0 45.0 27.1 28.3 32.7 35.9 1000 149 5.420% 12.9 49.5 29.2 29.9 35.8 38.5 1100 235 8.549% 11. 7 51. 5 30.3 30.4 36.5 39.6 1200 220 8.003% 11. 0 43.2 30.7 31. 6 36.8 39.0 1300 161 5.857% 9.5 44.9 28.5 29.3 34.4 38.0 1400 410 14.91% 8.7 43.1 25.6 24.9 31. 6 35.1 1500 263 9.567% 13.6 46.0 27.5 26.7 34.2 38.8 1600 276 10.04 % 16.2 49.8 29.7 30.2 36.7 40.2 1700 189 6.875% 13. 9 45.3 30.8 32.0 37.0 39.6 1800 127 4.620% 17.8 57.2 31. 5 32.7 37.6 40.8 1900 82 2.983% 9.3 45.3 30.1 30.9 37.3 41. 3 2000 25 0.909% 19.0 40.8 31.1 31. 8 38.8 40.4 2100 42 1. 52 8 % 10.0 47.2 32.1 35.0 40.3 43.1 2200 19 0.691% 15.4 38.8 29.1 32.9 38.0 38.8 2300 24 0.873% 15.2 44.2 27.9 27.0 36.4 44.1 2749 100.0% 6.5 57.2 28.4 28.6 35.3 38.8 46 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Speed Statistics by Hour Location: Stowe Drive, South of Scripps Poway Pkwy Direction: Southbound Volume Date Range: Thursday, April 4, 2019 Vehicles= 2772 Maximum = 56.1 mph, Minimum = 6.6 mph, Mean= 29 .6 mph 85% Speed= 38.98 mph, 95% Speed = 42.84 mph, Median = 31.82 mph Hour Bins: Time I Bin Min Max Mean Median 85% 95% I 0000 I 7 0.253% 16 .0 33.2 22.9 20.7 32.9 33.2 0100 2 0.072% 15.5 41. 2 28.4 28.4 41. 2 41. 2 0200 1 0.036% 16.3 16.3 16.3 16.3 16.3 16.3 0300 21 0.758% 14.2 40.5 25.6 20.7 36.1 40.3 0400 286 10.32% 6.7 52.1 24.7 21. 4 35.2 39.1 0500 209 7.540% 12.6 47.5 28.3 24.7 40.2 44.4 0600 247 8.911% 8.2 51. 3 31. 9 34.4 40.9 45.1 0700 278 10.03% 7.3 56 .1 30.0 31. 7 38.7 43.2 0800 240 8.658% 9.1 55.4 32.1 33.8 39.2 42.1 0900 157 5.664% 9.9 49.3 31.1 32.9 39.8 42.5 1000 132 4.762% 10.0 44.0 28.5 29.8 36.8 40.4 1100 172 6 .205% 12.6 51. 0 31. 6 33.5 38.9 42.8 1200 221 7.973% 11. 0 47.6 31. 3 33.6 38.9 41. 5 1300 193 6.962% 8.3 52.0 29.6 32.4 38.8 41. 7 1400 215 7.756% 6.6 50.0 25.6 24.2 36.2 39.9 1500 103 3.716% 11. 4 53.4 30.2 32.8 41. 0 44.6 1600 86 3.102% 13. 3 53.9 33.6 35.7 44.2 47.0 1700 70 2.525% 15.3 44.4 30.9 33.5 39.6 42.3 1800 39 1.407% 12.0 43.9 34.4 35.2 41. 0 43.4 1900 58 2.092% 10.9 42.0 28.1 29.6 36.7 40.8 2000 16 0.577% 9.3 39.0 28.6 31. 5 36.1 39.0 2100 12 0.433% 14.0 46.8 29.2 30.6 37.7 46.8 2200 5 0.180% 26.0 36.1 31. 5 32.3 36.1 36.1 2300 2 0.072% 35.6 38.0 36.8 36.8 38.0 38.0 2772 100.0% 6.6 56.1 29.6 31. 8 39.0 42.8 47 of 51 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 4542 Ruffner Street, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92111 Stowe Drive Pedestrian Crossing . T.O. 3-18-3001 Pedestrians Crossing Pedestrians Crossing West to East East to West West to East East to West Time Number Number Time Number Number 10:00 3 10:50 1 10:01 1 10:53 2 2 10:02 4 1 10:54 1 10:03 2 1 10:55 1 3 10:04 3 1 10:56 2 10:05 1 10:57 2 10:06 1 10:58 1 1 10:08 2 10:59 1 10:09 2 1 11:01 1 1 10:10 1 2 11:02 3 10:13 2 11:03 1 10:14 1 2 11:04 1 3 10:15 2 11:05 1 1 10:16 2 3 11:06 2 10:18 2 4 11:07 2 10:21 1 11:08 1 10:22 3 11:09 1 10:23 1 11:10 1 10:24 2 11:12 2 1 10:25 1 11:13 1 10:26 5 1 11:14 2 10:27 1 11:15 3 10:28 1 1 11:16 2 10:29 1 11:18 1 10:31 2 11:20 1 10:32 1 11:22 1 3 10:33 1 11:23 1 10:35 1 11:24 1 10:37 1 11:25 4 10:39 1 11:26 1 10:40 2 11:28 1 10:44 2 11:29 2 10:45 1 11:31 1 1 10:48 1 11:32 1 10:49 1 11:33 1 Report Generated by "Count Data" all rights reserved 48 of 51 Time 11:35 11:36 11:37 11:38 11:40 11:41 11:42 11:43 11:46 11:47 11:49 11:51 11:52 11:53 11:54 11:55 11:57 11:59 12:00 12:02 12:03 12:04 12:05 12:06 12:07 12:08 12:10 12:11 12:12 12:13 12:14 12:15 12:17 12:20 12:21 Page 1 of 2 3-Apr-19 Pedestrians Crossing West to East East to West Number Number 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 5 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 3 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 March 17, 2020, Item #9 Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers T.O. 3-18-3001 Time 12:22 12:24 12:25 12:28 12:29 12:30 12:31 12:32 12:33 12:35 12 :38 12:44 12 :45 12:47 12:48 12 :49 12:50 12:51 12:54 12:55 12:56 13:01 13:03 13:04 13:05 13:06 13:07 13:08 13 :10 13:11 13:12 13:13 13:14 13 :15 13:16 49 of 51 4542 Ruffner Street, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92111 Stowe Drive Pedestrian Crossing Pedestrians Crossing Pedestrians Crossing West to East East to West West to East East to West Number Number Time Number Number 1 13:17 1 1 13:20 1 1 13:24 1 1 13:25 1 1 13 :26 1 1 2 13:28 1 1 13:29 3 2 1 13:36 1 1 13 :43 1 1 1 13:44 1 1 1 13:46 1 1 13:47 4 2 13:48 2 4 2 13:51 1 1 13:54 1 1 13:56 1 1 1 13:57 1 1 13:59 2 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 Report Generated by "Count Data" all rights reserved Page 2 of 2 3-Apr-19 March 17, 2020, Item #9 u, 0 0 ..... u, ..... Direction: 1 -North bound Bearcat Enterprises, LLC SeQaration Statistics File: 19-035 Loe #01 Can M355 NB StoweDr So of ScrippsPowayPkwy Filter time: 10:00 Wednesday, April 3, 2019 => 14:00 Wednesday, April 3, 2019 (0.166667) Separation Bins (Partial days) Headwa:t: I Bin I Below I Abov e I sMult I n * sMult 0.00 -0.50 I 8 1.1% I 8 1.1% I 722 98 .9% I o.oo I 0.00 0 .50 -1.00 I 7 1 .0% I 15 2 .1 % I 715 97.9% I o.oo I 0 .00 1 .00 -2.00 I 23 3.2% I 38 5 .2% I 692 94 .8% I 0 .00 I 0 .00 2.00 -4 .00 I 61 8.4% I 99 1 3.6% I 63 1 86 .4% I 0 .00 I 0.00 4.00 -8 .00 I 1 48 20 .3% I 24 7 33.8% I 483 66.2% I 0.00 I 0.00 8 .00 -16 .00 I 160 21. 9% I 407 55 .8% I 323 4 4. 2% I 0 .00 I 0 .00 1 6 .00 -32 .00 I 1 88 25.8% I 595 81.5% I 1 35 18 .5% I o.oo I 0 .00 32.00 -64 .00 I 109 1 4.9% I 704 96. 4% I 26 3.6% I 0 .00 I 0.00 6 4 .00 -128 .00 I 25 3 .4% I 729 99.9% I 1 0.1 % I o.oo I 0.00 128.00 -1000 .00 I 1 0.1% I 730 1 00 .0% I 0 0.0% I 0 .00 I 0 .00 March 17, 2020, Item #9 u, ..... 0 .... u, A1ttribute: Direction: 1 -South bound Bearcat Enterprises, LLG SeQaration Statistics File: Filter time: 19-035 Loe #01 Can A555 SB StoweDr So of ScrippsPowayPkwy .EC0 (Plus) 10:00 Wednesday, April 3, 2019 => 14:00 Wednesday, April 3, 2019 (0.166667) Separation Bins (Partial days) Headwa::i1: I Bin I Below I Above I sMult I n * sMult 0 .00 -0 .50 I 15 2.1% I 15 2.1% I 713 97 .9% I o.oo I 0.00 0 .50 -1.00 I 1 9 2.6% I 34 4.7% I 69 4 95.3% I o.oo I 0 .00 1.00 -2.00 I 8 7 12.0% I 121 16 .6% I 60 7 83.4% I 0 .00 I 0 .00 2.00 -4.00 I 1 23 16 .9% I 244 33.5% I 48 4 66.5% I o.oo I 0.00 4 .00 -8.00 I 98 13 . 5% I 342 47.0% I 386 53.0% I o.oo I 0.00 8 .00 -16 .00 I 96 1 3 .2% I 438 60 .2% I 290 39.8% I 0 .00 I 0 .00 1 6.00 -32.00 I 11 8 1 6.2% I 556 7 6 . 4 % I 1 72 23.6% I 0 .00 I 0 .00 32.00 -64.00 I 131 18.0% I 687 94 .4% I 4 1 5 .6% I o.oo I 0.00 64 .00 -128.00 I 40 5.5% I 72 7 99.9% I 1 0.1 % I 0 .00 I 0 .00 1 28 .00 -1000 .00 I 1 0.1% I 7 28 100 .0% I 0 0 .0% I 0 .00 I 0.00 March 17, 2020, Item #9