Covenant Regarding Real Property 1989-385544
~
.
1582
38'
, " 8.9 .~5t5ltlt
":'f:cfifl(i];;~~g;1kiJ
.,'
RECo.RDING REQUEST BY:
CITY o.F Po.WAY
CITY CLERK
CITY o.F Po.WAY
P.D. 'Bo.X 789
Po.WAY, CA 92064
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
,j 89JUl 21 AMl/i25
I V'"R', I. 'v, ~iJ
~.;,.I'-';.,... ,-'t...t.
L-.E.OUN'J Y ,"<!:. CORDER ~
WHEN ,RECo.RDED MAIL TO:
No Transfer Tax Due
m....-',
RF' .. . ',',;
AR .' ,
MG
Co.VENANT REGARDING REAL PRo.PERTY
Ro.BERT L. CHILDERS co.., INC., a California corporation
("o.WNER"hereinafter) is the owner of real ,property described in
Exhibi:t A which isattachedhere'to and made a part hereof and
which is commonly known as Assessor's Parcel Number 314-193-38
("PROPERTY" hereinafter). In consideration of the approval of
variance 89-04 by the City of poway ("CITY" hereinafter), o.WNER
hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of the CITY, to abide
by conditions of the attached resolution (Exhibit B).
This Covenant shall run with the land and be binging upon
and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrances,
successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and
assigns of the respective parties.
In the event that. Variance 89-04 expires or is rescinded by
City Council at the request of the o.WNER, CITY shall expunge this
Covenant from the record title of the PRo.PERTY.
If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the
provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be
entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable
attorneys' fees, from the other party. The CITY may assign to
persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant the right to
enforce this Covenant against o.WNER.
Dated: June 21, 1989
o.WNER
ROBERT L. CHILDERS CO., INC.
~
~ ,.~ ,
Robert L. C llders, Presldent
Dated: June 30, 1989
CITY o.F Po.WAY
By: 76L, 0)r-[f~
.
, .1,583
.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE LANn REFERRED TO HEREIN ~S SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND. ISDESciuBED AS FOLLOWS:
LOT I OF C lTY OF POWAY TRACT NO. 87 -04. IN THE CITY OF PO"'A Y. COUNTY
OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP ~HEREOF NO. 12352,
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON APRIL
24,1989.
EXHIBIT A
,~}~.;'~".~ ~:
\
r
L
:,~;..... .
\"""".
\'.; '.:~'
",'.'"
, '
.
, 158'4
.
RESOLutION, NO, p~ 89- 46
ARESOCUJION OF IHE CITY COUNCIL
PF'THE:GlTY' OFPOWAY , CAL I FORNTA
APPFO-\i;HiG VARiANCE 89':04
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER3J~-193-03
WHEREAS, Varia,nee M-04 ,submitted by Robert Childers, appl i can't ,requests 'a
f,ou I" foot. reduction:i nthe ,requJred five foot fenci:I1,9 s'etbad along the western
pr.operty boundary of the, Park Yi'l1ageprojec't lQ'cated' one-halfbJock east of
, Mfd land Road on Adl",i,an Street, in th'e RC zone; and
~
, ,WHEREAS, on May.l6, 1989" the Ci ty Council held a du ly adverti sed plibYi c
hearing to solicit e()ml]1ents from the pub 1 ic, bo'th pro ,and con, re) ative to this
application.
NOW', fHEREFORE, the City o,f Poway does 'her,eby resolve as follows:"
Sedion 1:, Enyitonmental: Findings!:
The project ise'xerript'from Environmental-Review, Itqual{J.{es .for a Class 5
c'ategor'icaJ ex.empti,on ~beca.use the variahc'e 'j s a minor aHerati,on to 1 and use
1 i illi tations..
Section '2,: :Finding's:
1. Ther.e ar,e special :ciTc,umstances applicable, to ,the property (.si,ze"
shape'. topography'; locati on, or surroundi'ngs,), or, the ,i ntencted :use of
thepropertj" an'd 'because ofth,is, th.e ,strict appl icat,ionof the Zoning
Ordinance dep'rtvesthe property, o,f pr,i,yi leges, enjoyed, :by oth'er prop~r~
ties tn' the v,icinityunder identical zoning c') assifications" because
thest,ricp inJ~rpretation of the Zoning Standard for fencing would
deprive' thefuture6wners of th'ese housing 'u'iLi'ts of any usable rear
yard area.
Granti.ng the var'i:ance or its modifica'ti'on 'i's, 'necess'ary for the preser-
vation and"en'jojnient..of a substantia:l proper;,tj! right possessed by other
propertyi'n tb,e sa,me vi ci ni ty and zone and den i ed to the property for
Whi ch-:the', va.rfane~ i,s ,sought-. " . '
2,
Ghn,ting tb,~,var!a.n.ceor, its mo:difi ea,ti on will not be materially ,detri-
menta.l ,to 'the' publ'i'c hea,lth; silfetY'or ~Ie:];f,are,or injuri:ous to the, ,
pro'perty :qrimprovements i,n."sUCh (/icini'ty andzooe in whi:eh the pro-
perty is located" in that the aes'thetie impact of the change Vi,i 11 be
rni1;jgated by the: in'stallatiori of m,atching block pi lasterS and vi,ne
pock€ts witll lanas'caping,
4. Theigraf1~j;ng ,ofth,is variance. does notconsUtute a speci'al privi,leg~
'iDcon~,istent ,with, the liinitat,ion's upon .other properties in the vicinity
and zone i,n wh,ieh 'suet]' propertyi\situated"
3.
EXHIBIT B
.;."
, ';0'
. ",.~
.'
:. ~':;' :;''-
10.....
"
',T>
f
r
.,..'..:....-.
, "..";:.~
r'o
'.
.
158'5
Resol:ution No. P~ 89-46
Page 2
5. l'hegranti ng pf thj s Y.arian~edoes not'a,l:lowa use or acfi vity whi,ch:l s
not otherwiseexpresslyauthoritedb'y' 'th'e i,bni'ngregu 1 ation govern ing'
the parcel of :pribpel"ty"
;6. Ihat the gr~'n{tn.9 of the variance or its modlJicati on will not be
i ncompatibJe with the Poway Ci ty General Plan.
,Section J: C'itY Council- Decision:'
The. City Council o\,re,by finds that Variance 89,,04, is approved subject to the
foll owi ng condjti ons:
1: Wfthin '30:;ila-ys ofappi76val: (1)m!, applican~t shall subrnit in Writing
that all conditions ,qf' approval have been read and understood; and (2)
'th'e property 'ow,ner shall execute 'a'Covenant, ;on, RE'al Property.
,2" 'The PToper'ty 'shall' be'aeve,loped 'i,nacc()rdance.wi th the; APproved site
plan ana elevatfonsonfil e with thep,Tann i ng: 'Services Dep'artment
except that 'the: Wo'ed 'fence 'with slumpsJ;one pil asters will be placed on,
top of We rnasonry rl2tai,ningwall. ,All applicable cohditions of TTM'
87~04 arid DR 87-19, shall apply.
3. T;heappropriate. 'Bu,tld"i,ng Department, approvals s'hall b'e rece,i ved pnor
to i ni ti'ati'onof construc ti,on"
4,. Approval of tti,;.s vari'ance Shall not wa.ive' compl iance vlith a'll other
sections ofthe~ori'i ng Deve'i opment Code' and a llothe,r applicable tity
ordi,nances i'n effect at the time of bilild'ing permit issuance.
5',., Th,is permit shal'l become null and vo'idon ,May 16, 1990, unless a time
extensi,on is eji'allted'by theCity':C'ou,ncil. ,Application for a time
extensi.onrnust b~r~ce;ived i,n the' Planni,ng Services Department no,] ater
than '90d'ays pri:or to the expiration date'ofthi'spermi t.
" ',N,pMYE1i a,~d,f!D',OPTED by ttle, , 'City Counei 1 oJ/he City of Poway"
Callf;orhla, th,lS 16th day of May, 1989. ' /'U"/' \
,
"
,K~0(~C:;;-f
Car,l R. K'ru se" Mayor
State Of
ATTESl':
K ;)','V'~~
: Wah'lsten,; CltyCler
\
..~. ~ ".. ,. .'
. .
" '
r
L
.,
..
ST A'T'E:OF.:CAL IFORNIA
,COUNTY 'OF .SAN D IE,GO
'.
1:5'8-6
.
Resolytion No,. p- 89-46
Page 3
)
') ss.
)
'1, Marjorie K. W~h.l sten" City, Clerk .of the CUyof Poway ,db hereby certify,
uni:ler thepena]tyofp~rj,ury., tbat the foregoi ng Resolution, No. P-89-46 , was
<!l!lya.dopted by the City Counci'lat a meetiri'g Of said City Council held on the
16th day-of May , 1989, and that it was so adopted by the followi'ng
vote: '
AYES:
NOES.;.
AB~T AIN,:
ABSENT:
R/R-5C:lb.3"5
. BRANNON, EMERY, GOLDSMITH ,HIGGINSON, KRUSE
NONE,
NONE
NONE
"
'-",
, personally known to ~e ~:1ooH.ecOl1'KlR!X
~~a;UU~f>>;y~et),to'be,the persons who executed the within instrument as
PresidentXll(t1{ ~cn!f.a:~,on behalf of Robert ~.
Childers Co.. Inc.
.
, .1587
~
;::
c
.
u
"g
E
";'
~ a
u:: E
-0
5"(,)
-.;:: C1l
. u
_ c
g, ~
" ,
o ~
~E
,STATE OF CAliFORNIA,
COUNTY, OF, San Dieiw
On June 21. 1989
said "Stale, personally'appeared Robert L. Childers
the corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that
such corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its
by-laws or a resolution of,its board of directors.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
N
'"
~
N
o
o
'"
S;gnalure~~, L. ~ 07' ;--,
.
I
155.
I
_,'bet~_T~ '~e, the undersigned, a Notary public inand for
ua::
OFFICIAL SEAL I
S l ZIEPKE Ii
NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA (
SAND/EGO COUNTY
:My comm, expires AUG 24, 1992
--~~
(ThiS area for official notarial"seal)