Loading...
Covenant Regarding Real Property 1988-282899 r" , ,~ I . ' . . 'I " I .' ,> ..,U 1418 .88 2828,9;9 f'--'-'~i-::;Ll,lHDEiJ'tU 1 I ";"""':1 ";,'''r""". I ~ r ::i.;~ '::1:: Z;H" ~~~Jf:~;')':/ :::.'\. . ,.. -..;. RECORDING REQUEST BY: CLTY OF POWAY WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF POWA Y P.O. BOX 789 POWAY, CA 92064 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) l(i9J1 J'l" f 4 '" 8' "6 ,"'..>-.... lJ>t jH1' ..). I r..~:i:~1;~,~7 L. t,.'fL.:': f ~Uu!i; ,ft[CnrWEh I RF <4 ) AR I, j MGI ,. (This space f6r Recerder's use) No Transfer Tax Due COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY Community Church of Poway ("OWNER" hereinafter') is the owner ef real pro- perty described in Exhi.bit ,A which is attached her.eto and made a part hereof ("PROPERTY" hereinafter). In consideration of the approval of Conditional Use Permi t 87 -02TE and Deve] opment Revi ew 87 -04TEby 'the City of Poway (" CITY" herei nafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees fO,r the benefit of the CITY, to abide by conditions of the attached reselution (Exhtb~t B). Thi s Covenant shall run wi th the 1 and and be bi nding upon and i nur,e to the benefit of the future ewners, encumbrancers, successefs, heirs, perso~al representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the Property. Upon notice and opportunity to. respond, the CITY may add to. the tax bi n of OWNER any pas t due fi nanci ill eb 1 i gat ion owi ng to CITY BY way of this Covenant. If either party is 'requi red to. incur costs to enforce th'~" provi s i o'n~ of 'tl1i s Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement,~f, all costs, including reasonabYe attorneys' fees, from the other party. The CITY may assign to persens impacteq by the performance of this Covenant the right to enforce this Cevenant against OWNER. Dated: ~J:nO Ie /I'9W efflllO -J ~~ WN ( t 'iz'e') Dated: CITY OF POWAY By 'P.L^~ &.)~ -~ (No need to. No ize) C: NOR-4-5.1 . . GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT ~ lJ- LO ~nq,,'" R~t:>rd/~ Re... I "4.",,,,,er"';Y ..M:.t9 NO. 201 I I l G~/~oItNJA ' rl. .:J u ....e,.. 19 2$', before me, State of }SS, On this the , day of County of SA/) ,LN E' fF'O G-rl-lv ,(-5 teok>'l..u , , the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared 0"'.....ES L. J3 0 IN E 1e's"X , - ~ personally known to me D ~r8. S8 18 FF1E! 8" the ~a':';3 of ~t.lL.3fa8ter~' 9":~""''''<::'& @ -=- to be the person'tsl whose name'lsl, AS subscribed to the , '" ,(' CATHYIIROICAW " within instrument, and acknowledged that hlL executed it. ...." "Jtlftc t4llfl.~" WITNESS my hand and official seal. . " _ DIfGOCQUHr( Mr QInm, &II,"". ft. 111119 C cd, -4...__, . Notary's Slgna~ 7110122 NATIONA.L NOTARY ASSOCIATION . 23012 Ventura Blvd. . P.O. Box 4625 . Woodland Hills, CA 91365-4625 \ " ;.'~ .-; 'Lp;GAL DESCRIPTION OR'JER NO. 93.7147-19 . . - H20 . ,The land referred to ,herein is situated in the State of California, County of ,S;lll Diego, and is 'described as follows: All that portion of the West Half of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 14 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the County of San Diego, State of California, City of Poway, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, distant thereon South 88058'55" East 197.68 fee't from the Southwest corner thereof, said ,point being also the Southeast corner of the land as described in deed to the Communi ty Church of Poway, recorded May 22" 1950 in Book 3628, page 318 of Official' Records; thence South 88058'55" East along said South line 30.00 ,feet; thence North 1054' East paranel with and 30.00 feet Easterly at right angles to said East line of said Community Church land 637.32 feet to a point of intersection with the Westerly prolongation of the Northerly line of the land as described, in deed to Melvin C',Harper and Nellie B. Harper, recorded July 29, 1957 in Book 6682, page 513 of Official Records; thence North 88055'30" West ,along said prolongation 227.68 feet to' the West line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence South 1054' West along said West line 637.32 feet to the Southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence Easterly along the South line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter 197.68 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. OJ/do EXHIBIT A .-:-:., . r ( '.' '" ',' ~' . -v 1421 . . RESOLUTION NO. P- 88-41 !, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ,THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-02TE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-04TE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 317-110-65 WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit 87-02TE and Development Review 87.~04TE, submitted by poway Communi ty Church, applicant, requests a oh~-year time extension for CUP 87-02 and a six-month time exten~' sion f6r DR 87-04 for an addition to an existing religious complex at 13501 Community Road in the RS-2 (Residential Single Family) zone and, WHEREAS, on April 5, 1988, the City Council held a hearing on the above-referenced item, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: Environmental Findinqs: In conjunction with approval of CUP 87-02 and Development Review 87-04, the ,Council issued a Negative Declaration on April 7, 1987. Since there have not been any changes to the proposed project, the existing Negative Declaration satisfies the requirements of CEQA. Section 2: Findinqs: Conditional Use ,Permit 87-02TE 1. That the location, size, design, and operating charac- teristics of the proposed use will be compatible with and will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent use's,. residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, in ,that t,l1e ,addition to the existing church will complementex!sting multi-family and commer- cial development ana provide a service to the community. 2. That the harmony ih scale, bulk, coverage, and density is consistent with adjacent uses, in that the proposed buildings are architecturally compatible with surrounding residential structures and existing on-site buildings 3. That there are available public facilities, services, and utilities. 4. That there will not be a harmful effect upon desirable neighborhood characteristi9s, in that the required 50 foot setback area froIIlthEl ,residential property north of the subject site will huffer the propOsed activities. .. ;--' , r l -. ' . .. ." 1422 Resolution No. p-88-41 Page 2 5. That the ~eneration of traffic will not adversely impact the surrounding streets and/or the City's Circulation Element. 6. That the site is suitable for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed, in that all develop- ment standards will be met through project construction. ' 7. That there will ndt be significant harmful effects upon environmental quality and natural resources. 8. That there are no other relevant negative impacts of the proposed use that cannot be mitigated. 9. That the impacts, as described above, and the location of the proposed use will not adversely affect the City oi poway General plan for future as well as present develop- ment. 10. The applicant has purchased their Letter of Sewer Availability from Public Services which indicated their commitment to development of the project. Development Review 87-04TE 1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Poway General Plan, in that the development of churches are encouraged in residential zones. 2. That the prpposed development will not have an adverse aesthetic, health, safety, or architecturally related impact upon adjoining properties in that the proposed buildings are architecturally compatible with surrounding residential and semi-public developments, and the required improvement will protect the health and safety of adjoining properties. 3. That the proposed developmert ,is in compliance with the Zoning Ordin~nce in that all development standards will be met through project construction. 4. That the proposed development encourages the orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and property within the City in that the proposed buildings will incorporate architectural details, materials, and colors that will be complementary to adjacent buildi~gs. ;.";" . . r t <, ." 1423 . . Resolution No. p-88-~ Page 3 5. Although the Council has not adopted a policy for reviewing t~m~ extensions for development review permits, the applicant has shown a commi,tment to development of the projec~ through the purchase of the LOA. Section 3: City Council Decision, The City Council hereby approves Conditional Use Permit 87-02TE_ and Development Review 87-04TE subject to the following conditions: 1. Within 30 days of approval the applicant shall submit in writing that all conditions of approval have been read and understood and the property owner shall execute a Notice of Restriction on Real Property. 2. All conditions of Resolution P-87-15 shall apply. 3. Within ten days of approval of the time extensions, the applicant shall ~ost with the City a non-refundable addi- tional reservation fee equal to 10 percent of the appropriate sewerage connection fee, plus administrative charges to retain the existing Letter of Availability (LOA) . 4. Conditional Use Permit 87-04TE ,shall expire on April 7, ,1989 and no further time extensions can be granted. Development Review 87-04TE shall expire on October 7, 1988. An application for one additional six month time extension may ,be submitted 9'0 days prior to the expiration date of DR 87-04TE. APPROVED and ADOPTEDb~the City Council of the City of Poway, State of California, 'this 5th day of A'pril, 1988. ATTEST: '--l '/ V \/ J/ ,;/ L f '1CL.,,~iLV{ h j) (v[...:':,Ci.- Marjorie\ K. Wcihlsten, City Clerk '\,.) ..~--'.~ ~ . . .\1 1424 . Resolution No. P- 88-41 Page 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 55. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO I, Marjorie K. Wahlsten, City Clerk of the City of poway, do hereby certify, under the penalty of perjury, that the foregoing Resolution, No. P-88-41 ,was duly adopted by the City Council at a meeting of said City ,CounCil held on the 5th day of April 1988, and that it was so adopted by the following vote: -, AYES: BRANNON, HIGGINSON, KRUSE, TARZV, EMERY NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: NONE " 1 1,/ '" II )u ,t ..! Y'Ll"'L/~~.A... K ,,:-J ,(..v........:-. L..._ Marjorie K. Wahlsten, City Clerk City of poway R/R-4-5.2'3-26