Covenant Regarding Real Property 1990-0671752
;
<,\
'("p"-'
,-
.'
139.0
DOC. 1990-0671752
13-DEC-1990 03:43 AM
SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE
VERA L. LYLE, COUNTY RECORDER
RF: 24.00 FEES:
AF: 22,00
FiF: 1. 00
47.00
:~".
.~
.....~ /' .-.
P ...
.
RECORDING REQUEST BY:
CITY OF POWAY
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF POWAY
P.O. BOX 789
POWAY, CA 92064
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
(This space for Recarder's Use)
L/~
'h~'\
tr
Na Transfer Tax Due
COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY
Environmental Develapment;, Ltd. , a California Limi ted
partnership who acquired title as Environmental Development, Ltd.,
a California Limi t"edpar,tnership ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the
owner of real property described in Exhibit A which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof and which is commonly known as
Assessor's Parcel Numbers 273-182-18, 19; 273-100-10, 11; 277-010-
02, 05, 22, 23; 277-070-24, 27 - 31; 277-071-01-02, 08, 09; 277-
140-01,06,23,24,26 ("PROPERTY" hereinafter). In
consideration of the approval of Tentative Tract Map 89-13R. and
Conditional Use Permit 90-<13 by the City of poway (,"CITY"
hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for, the benefit of
the CITY, to abide by conditians of the attached resolution
(Exhibit B).
This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and
inure ta the benefit .of the future owners, encumbrancers,
successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and
assigns .of the r~spective parties.
In the event that Tentative Tract Map 89-13R and Conditional
Use Permit 90-13 expire or are rescinded by City Council at the
request of the OWNER, CITY shall expunge this, Covenant from the
record title of the PROPERTY.
If, either party is required to incur c.osts to enforce the
provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled
to full reimbursement of all costs, includiIlg reasonable attorrieys'
fees, from the other party. The CITY mayassigri to persons
impacted by the performance of this Covenant the right to enforce
this Covenant against OWNER.
Dated: JJu... 7 1990
"
Dated: '7(~~'Q If'!l:>
"~
OWNER (Notarize)
CITY OF POWAY
By
'Pn'~ LJ~- ~~
(No need to Not rize)
,..............'-L.OI.:"'~r-........\.L...........~.J.CoJ.."II.l.-
:*, * ~~* * *. * * * * * * * *
. '* state of
*: :-i:-.'.; 1
.' * ,County, of '
~.;*
*, *. -* * * .*,"*. *, -* *
" ,
'.,. On this. the
)
* 1) PI * * * * *, ,* ,
19 _, before Ire,,, ~
.
.
* *.* * * * * i~~
. day of ~.
* * *
,
the ui1dersi~nedNJtary Public,peri30nally appeared
.
.
*
*
.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*,
,*
*
*
,*
*
*,
*
*
,
t1 personally lmown to Ire
t1 proved to Ire on the basis of satisfactory
to be the person(s) whose name(s)
to the within instrurrent, and aclmowledged
executed it.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
evidence
subsCribed
that
*
*
*
*
* Notary. s Signature
* * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * ,* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * .* *. * * * * * * * * * *
*
*
PARTNERSHIP ~
* * * * * * * * * * * ** * *
* state of
*
* County of
*
*
*
*
*
*
* * '* * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * *-,:* *
On this the
) SS.
)
day of
19 _, before Ire, *
*
*
,
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
*
*
*
"
*
*
*
,*
t1' personally lmown to Ire
t1 proved to Ire on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) who ,executed the within instrurrent *
on behalf of the partnership, and acknowledged to Ire that ,*
the partnership executed it. *
WITNESS my hand and official seal. *
*.
*
*
*
*
*
*
* *
* ,Notary 's, Signature *
* * * * * * * * * * * * '* * * * * * .* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CClRPa<ATE llCKNCWLEI:GlEN
* * * *"* * * * * * * * * *
* State of C().; I/Foi" I'll ~ '
* *
~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
on this the 7 day of ''December, 199Q,before Ire, *
*
J U ILL j3c.n n e. Tt *
,
the undersigned Notary Public, personallY appeared *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*.
*
*
*
*
*
*
'*
*
*
*
.* * * *
) 55.
)
,~n u~~n
County of
bViALe
,
*
*
;;: TCLbh
(6/84)
*
,~ personally lmowntori'e :
t1 proved to Ire on, the basis of satisfactory evidence 'to *
be the person(s) who executed the within instrurrent as *
'Pre 6/ dei"Lf:.- or on behalf of th~ =rporation .*
therein 11affi2d, and aclmbWledged to Ire that the =rporation *
executed it.
WITNESS my haro and official seal.
QMAu' ~
NotaIy,s'Signature *
* * * * * * * *.* * * .* * * * * *. * * * * * *. * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * *- * * *~
OFFICIAL SEAL
JUNE BENNETT,
NOTARV PUBLic. C^UFORNlA
SAN OlEGO COUNTY
M:yComm.~Aug.l.'lW4
*
*
*
*
1392
'.. i" ..\,~l ',.: R. .
,~~ ...... _ (C'
.... :_ ' --1
i~~':~~~;E~ii:\i;
.
.
ORDER NO. 1012118-6
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY ,OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL '1:
ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (LOT 3) OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 1 ,WEST, SAN
BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING T'o OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, LYING EASTERLY OF A
LINE THAT IS PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER
(LOT 3) AND IS 687.61 FEET EASTERLY THEREOF, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT
PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT TH-E EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 13
SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST; THENCE SOUTH 33000'.56" EAST, 816.25 FEET TO THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 40043'00" EAST, 89.98 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 82017'00" EAST, 70.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 52017'00" EAST,
120.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 7043'00" WEST, 105.,29 FEET; THENCE NORTH
82017'00" WEST, 187.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14017'00" WEST, 65.00 FEET
TO A POINT TO BE KNOWN HEREIN AS POINT "A"; THENCE NORTH 14017'00"
WEST, 31.00 ]'EET; THENCE NORTH 40043'00" EAST, 2.98 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT ALL WATER CLAIMS OF RIGHTS TO WATER, IN OR UNDER SAID LAND.
PARCEL 2:
ALL THAT PORTION OF THE .sOUTHWEST QUARTER (LOT 4) OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 1 .WESf', SAN
BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF SAN
DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA; ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, LYING
NORTHERLY OF A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID
SOUTHWEST QUARTER (LOT 4) AND IS 1,209.80 FEET SOUTHERLY THEREOF.
EXCEPT ALL CLAIMS OR RIGHTS TO WATER, IN OR UNDER SAID LAND.
PARCEL 3:
ALL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (LOT 4) OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER ,OF SECTION '19, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH , RANGE 1 WEST,' SAN
BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, LYING SOUTHERLY OF A
LINE THAT I'S PARABLEL TO THE NORTHERLY LINE .OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER
(LOT 4) AND IS 1,209.80 FEET SOUTHERLY THEREOF.
PAGE 33
. ..","' .o\,}:1 ,t ~.R
~'.:1 1. - !,C
;:?~B~~~~;~:;:j~~,
\;\'".,..)~..""",.. -",-'
"'';'':'L:;'r,,'"7-'::~::_'::'''''
,',.
.
.
1393
ORDER NO. 1012118-6
EXCEPT ALL'CLAIMS OR RIGHTS TO, WATER IN OR UNDER SAID LAND.
PARCEL 4A:
THE ,NORTHWEST QUARTER (LOT 1) OF THE NORTHWEST''qUARTER OF SECTION 30,
TOWNSHIP '13 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE'ANDMERIDJ:AN, IN
THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFIUCIAL
PLAT., THEREOF, EX"CEPTJ:NGTHEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED 'PARCEL: .
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (LOT 1) OF
SAID SECTION 3 0; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT' 1" NORTH
0006"10" WEST, 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8905:3"50" WEST, 200.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 0'006'10" EAST, 1'00.00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO'THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 200 'FEET
MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT"OF BEGINNING,
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM. .THAT PORTION OF THE WEST H1I.LF OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTJ:QN 30, TOWNSHIP 13 SOOTH, RANGEl WEST, 'SAN
BERNARDINO .BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COuNTY 'OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF
'CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 'SURVEY THEREOF
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF ,ROAD SURVEY NO.
335 (ESPOLA ,ROAD) AND,'THECENTER LINE OF ROAD S~VEYNO.' 7-22 (OLD
COACH ROAD); THENCE ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ROAD SURVEY NO. 722
NORTH 5040'37" EAST, 100:1'8 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALSO
,B~ING AN IN:TERSECTI.C>~ WITH ,THE::~9RTHEA13T:e;~Y RIc:;HT OF \'\lAY 0,F THE S~"
DIEGO AQUEDUCT; 'THENCE ALONG SAID AQUEDUCT RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH
37024'41" WEST, 356~00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 25030'00" EAST, 241.29
FEET; THENCE SOUTH. 64030'00" ,EAST, 23'4.52 FEET .TO A POINT IN THE ARC
OF ,A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1000.00 FEET,
SAID CURVE BEIi!"G THE CEN'l:ER LINE OF SAID S\JR.VEY NO. 722; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTER LINE AND. CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 19.049' 23'''" A DISTANCE OF 345.98 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY
TERMINUS THEREOF; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CEBTER LINE SOUTH
~ " _.r- . . -. . '--
5040'37" WEST, 68.34 FEET TO THE .TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT ALL WATER CLAIMS OR RIGHTS TO WATER, IN OR UNDER 'SAID LAND.
PARCEL, 4B:
THAT PORTION OF THE ~O~T!JWES~ QUARTF;~ OT. S:e;CTION 30, T9WNSHTP 1)
SOUTH, RliNi:;E1WEST, SAN BE~ARI?INO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE, COUNTY
OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT
THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW:
PAIiiE 34
, . . .
.'- .
,~"1:. ..\.\1 t"N I'
'I-" ,'~ ,('
'\,. ~'.~. ", "'1
, """"" 'I'
{!~~~;~;~;:;' .
.
.
1394
ORDER NO.. 1012118-6
BEGl'NNING AT THE SOUTHEAST ,CORNER OF LOT "1. OF SAID SECTION 30 ; THENCE
.:ArBIiq .'THE ;Ej.S'l'LINE OF SA'ID LOT 1, NORTH'00,06,io'i, "WEST,' 100"00 FEET;
TfIENCE S9W:!l1l}!,053"50" WEST, 200.00 FEET;; THENCE SOUTHoo06~:t0" ,EAST
TO THE, NORTH,LIFE OF THE COPNTY ROAD KNOWN AS ESPOLA ROAD ,ACCO@ING
TO PLAT .OF ,ROAD SURVEY NO. 335 ON FILE IN THE ,OFFICE OF TH"E COUNTY
ENGINEER; THENCE ALONG SAlp NORTH LINE SOUTH, 83'026"48" EASTTOA LINE
WH:(CHBEAR~ SOUTH 0006' 10" EAST FOR TIm i>ciIN'r OF ;BEGINNING; THENCE
NORTH 0006" r'o" WEST, 11~. 61 FEET TO THE POINT OF ,BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN SAID LOT 1 OF SECTION 30.
PARCEL 4C:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 1 I~ THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 30.,
TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RAN.GE 1 '\I1E$T, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN ,
ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT "THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF SAID SECTION 30; TH.ENCE
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, NORTH 0006'10" WEST, 100.00 FEET,;
THENCE SO(frH 89053'50" WES,T', 200.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0006'10n'EAST,
100 FEET, MORE OR LESS., .TO THE SOUTH LIN:E; QF SAID LOT 1;, THENCE
EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 200 FEET, MORE ,OR LESS, TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING,
PARCEL 5:
ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 13
SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY
OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL ,fLAT
THEREOF, LYING BETWEEN THE SOUTflERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
(LOT 1) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SA"J,:D ,SECTION 30" AND THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF THE COUNTY ROAD KNOWN AS ES~OLA ROAD, ACCORDING TO
THE pLAT OF ROAD SURVEY ,NO. 335, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AS SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1 AND THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF ROAD SURVEY NO. 335 ARE SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY
NO. 6721 ,FI)1.ED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF' SAN DIEGO
COUNTY, AUGUST 3, 1966 AND LYING WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
LINE:
COMMENCING .AT THE. SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT10F SAID SECTION 30;
THENCE AI:ONG THE .EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, NOR';I'f1 0006'10" WEST, 10,0.00
FEET; THENCE~SOUTH 89053'50" WEST, 200.,00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED LINE; THENCE SoUTH 0006' 10" EAST TO
_.c.. -,I'>' - - .
THE NORTH LINE OF' SAID ROAD SURVEY NO. 335.
EXCEPT ALL WATER CLAIMS OR RIGHTS TO WATER, IN OR UNDER SAID LAND.
PAGE 35
, ,
...... .,;,-~,l' [ ". j'
;<:'\'. .:: ~ c
'~~~fE'~":;
,,-
PARCEL 6:
ALL CF THE NORTIfEAST QUARTER CF .THE NORT~EAST QUARTERCFJ SECTICN 25,
TCWNSHIP 13 SCUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO. BASE AND MERIDIAN~ IN
THE Co.UNTY o.F SAN DIEGO., STATE o.F CALIFo.RNIA.,ACCo.RDING TO. CFF,ICIAL
pLAT THEREo.F.
.
.
1395
CRDER NO.. 1012118-6
.
EXCEPT ALL WATER CLAIMS OR RIGHT TO. WATER IN CR UNDER SAID LAND.
PARCEL 7:
THE NCRTHEAST QUARTER CFTHE SOUTHEAST QUARTER CF SECTICN 24, IN
TOWNSHIP 13 SCUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO. BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN
THE CCUNTY CF SAN DIEGO; STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCCRDING TO. CFFICIAL
PLAT THEREo.F. '
EXCEPTING THEREFROM .TH.AT PCRTIo.N OF SAID No.RTHEAST QUARTER CF SAID
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24 DESCRIBED AS FOLLo.WS:
Co.MMENCING AT THE NCRTHEAST CORNER o.F LOT.J, "RESERVED Fo.R FUTURE
STREET" , CF VALLE VERDE: Co.UNTRY CLUB ESTATES, ACCo.RDIN.G TO. "MAP
THEREo.F NO.. 4683, FILEI:J IN THE CFFICE o.F THE' Co.UNTY RECo.RDER CF SAN
DI.EGo. Co.UNTY, DECEMBER 21, 1960; THENCE No.RTH 88033'17" WEST, ALONG
THE No.RTHERLY LINE CF 'SAID LOT 3, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 1"26'43" EAST, 232.00 FEET TO. THE BEGl'~ING CF TANGENT 550.00
Fo.o.T RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY j THENCE. NORTHERLY ALCNG THE ARC
CF SAID CURVE THRCUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE CF 20016"53", A DISTANCE CF
194.6,9 FEET; THEN(CE RADIAl:;, T() SAID CURVE NORTH 68016'24" WEST" 30.00
FEET TO THE TRUE Po.INT OE BEGINNINGj THENCE NCRTH 76033:'.32" WES',I'.,
484.14 FEETj THENCE No.RTH 4002'32" WEST, 280..84FEETJj THENCE No.RTH
84041'38" EAST, 27L61FEET,j ,THENCE SOUTH 63004'42" EAST, 426.61 FEET
TO. A Po.INT o.N THE 1.RC o.F A 580.00 Fo.CT RADIUS CURVE, Co.NCAVE
EASTERLY, BEING Co.NCENTR1C WITH AND DISTANT 30.00 FEET WESTERLY
MEASURED RADIALLY FROM. THE: ABo.VE MENTIONED 550.0.0 ,Fo.CT RADIUS CuRV~ A
RADIAL LINE TO. SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 40045'24" WESTj THENCE
SOUTHERLY'.ALONG THE I\RC OE; SAID 580,00 Fo.o.TCURVE, THRo.UGH A .CENTRAL
ANGr.E OF 27031'00", A DISTANCE o.F 278.55 FEET TO. THE TRUE POINT o.F
BEGINNING. '
PARCEL 8:
ALL THAT PCRTICN. CFTHE No.RTHWEST QUARTER (LOT 3) o.F THE So.UTHWEST
QUARTER o.F SECTioN 19 , To.WNSIUP 13 So.UTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN
BERNARDINO. BASE AND 'MERIDIAN, IN THECo.uNTY OF SAN DIE:Gp, l>,TATE CF
CALIFORNIA, ACCCRDING. TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF:, LYING WESTERLY CF A
LINE THAT IS PARALLEL TO. THE WESTERLY LINE' CF SAID NCRTHWEST QUARTER
(LCT 3) AND IS ~87.61 FEE',I' EASTERLY THEREo.F, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT
PCRTION DESCRIBED ASFo.LLo.WS:
PAGE 36
. ,.... ,
1.0 ...... A. ,\I"l-; "
'1;.,,' I'
,~. '". (' '1
~~~~f~:Y
.~,
.
.
1396
ORDER NO. 1012118-6
BEGINNING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 13
SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST; THENCE SOUTH 33000'56" EAST, 816.25 FEET TO THE
TRUE POINT OF 'BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 40043'00" EAST, 89.98 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 82017'00" EAST, 70.00 FEET; THENCE SOUT!! 52017'00" EAST,
120.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 7043'00" WEST, 105.29, FEET; THENCE NORTH
82017'00" WEST, 187.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14017'00" WEST, 65.00 FEET
TO A POINT TO BE KNOWN HEREIN AS POINT "A"; THENCE NORTH 14017'00",
WEST, 31. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40043' 00" EAST, 2.98 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 9:
ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 24" TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST,SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND
MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STA~E OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING
TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT J, "RESERVED FOR FUTURE
STREET" , OF VALLE VERDE COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES, ACCORDING TO MAP
THEREOF NO . 4683, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN
DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBER 21, 1960; THENCE NORTH 88033'17" WEST" ALONG
THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT J, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET,; THENCE
NORTH 1"26'43" EAST, 232.00 FEET TO THE BEGINIHNG OF A TANGENT 550.00
FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC
OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20016' 53", A DISTANCE OF
194.69 FEET; THENCE RADI'AL TO SAID CURVE NORTH 68016'24" WEST, 30.00
FEET 'TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 7603,3'32" WEST,
484.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 4002'32" WEST, 280.84 FEET; THENCE NORTH
84041'38" EAST, 271.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63004'42" EAST, 426.61 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A 580.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE
EASTERLY, BEING CONCENTRIC WITH AND DISTANT 30.00 FEET WESTERLY
MEASURED RADIALLY FROM THE ABOVE MENTIONED 550,00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE A
RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 40045'24" WEST; THENCE
SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 580.00 FOOT CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 27031'00", A DISTANCE OF 278.55 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING, CONTAINING AN AREA OF 4.11 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL 10:
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18; THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 19; THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19; THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 19; ALL IN
TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN
THE COUNTY OF ,SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL
PLAT THEREOF.
PAGE 37
.. ...... .
.~ "{ .".t.! 4t It
S. ... J c
~%rr~~;{!~~~(:0~~I:.
"~~~~~?;/!::~'(':
.
--., . 1397
ORDER NO. 1012118-6
ALSO: T~T PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTE~ OF THE 'NORTHWEST, QUARTER
AND THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE -SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH,
RANGE 1 'WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN
DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, LYING
WESTERLY OF THE CENTER LINE OF OLD COACH ROAD, KNOWN AS COUNTY ROAD
SURVEY 72 2 .
PARCEL 11:
LOTS 1 AND 2 (THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER) OF SECTION 19,
TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN
THE COUN,TY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING'TO UNITED
STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY' THEREOF.
EXCEPTING THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF VALLE VERDE
COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO,. 4683, FILED IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBER 21, 1960.
ALSO EXCEPTING THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID LOT 1.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT TH~ SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 89 OF VALLE VERDE COVNTRY
CLUB ESTATES, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 4683, FILED IN THE OFFICE
OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBEF-21, 1:960;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 89, NORTH 01"00'26" EAST,
130.00 FEET TO, THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 89; THENCE LEAVING
THE BOuNDARY .OF' SAID LOT 89, SOUTH 88051'34" SOUTH 88051'34" EA'ST,
80.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 03<>17'09" WEST, 130.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH
88051'34" WEST, 76.06 FEET, 'MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 12:
THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST,
SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF,.
EXCEPTING FROM SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, THE
EASTERLY 792,00 FEET THEREOF.
PARCEL 13:
THE EASTERLY 792.00 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER 'OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 13 SOOTH, RANGE 1 ,WEST, SAN
BERNARDINO BASE' AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF.
PAGE 38
- ;,~'..." ,
"
'.
.
.
.. -;
1398
RESOLUTION NO. P- 9O-S1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 89-13R
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-13
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 273-182-18, 19; 273-100-10, 11;
277-010-02, 05, 22, 23; 277-070-24, 27 - 31;
277-071-01, 02, 08, 09; 277-140-01, 06, 23, 24, 26
WHEREAS, Revised T,entative Tract Map 89-13R, hereinafter "Map"
submi tted by Env,ironmental Development, Inc. , Bruce Tabb,
applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property
situated in the City of Poway, County of San Diego, State of
California, described as the portion of Section 18, 19, and 30,
Township 13 North, Range One West, San Bernardino Base Meridian and
a portion of Section 24 and 25, Township 13 South, Range 2 Wes,t,
San Bernardino Base Meridian into 156 residential lots, one golf
course lot, and six open space lots, and Conditional Use Permit 90-
13 for development of a 27 hole golf course with associated
clubhouse facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Director ,o( Planning Services has recommended
approval of the map subj'ect to all conditions set forth in the
Planning Services Department report; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has read and considered said report
and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby resolve as
follows:
Section 1: Environmental Findinqs:
1. The City Council finds that the proposed revised
tentative map and conditional use permit are components
of the Old Coach Golf Estates project for which a Final
Environmental Impact Report (SCH #90010015) was certified
by the City Council on May 15, 1990. The Final
Environmental Impact Report has been considered and found
to c;ontain .an adequate assessment of the impacts of the
revised tentative tract map and conditional use permit.
The revised map and conditional use permit ha,ve been
conditioned to implement all applicable mitiga,tion
measures identified in the Final EIR.
2. City Staff analyzed the changes that have occurred in the
Old Coach Development project ("Project") since
certification of the Old Coach EIR ("EIR) by comparing
and contrasting Revised Tentative Tract Map 89-13-R
("RTTM 89-13-R") with Tentative Tract Map 89-13 ("TTM 89-
13" ), which was analyzed in the EIR and Mr. Vincent
Scheidt, the City's biological consultant compared the
'J"
.
.
~
1399
Resolution No. p_90-91
page 2
detailed plans for the Old Coach Golf Course ("Golf
Course") contain~d in the application for a conditional
usepermi t ("CUP" ) with the Golf Course conceptual worst
case analysis contained in the EIR.
In a letter dated October 16 1990, Mr. Scheidt informed
the City that he had reviewed RTTM 89-13-R and the CUP
and concluded that RTTM 89-13-R and the CUP were in
substantial compliance with the EIR. In reaching this
conclusion, Mr. Scheidt noted the following changes or
comments to the proj ect and some additional measures
necessary to assure that the Project remains in
substantial conformance with the impacts and mitigation
measures analyzed in the EIR:
a. The biological buffer to' the riparian habitat
should be more precisely'defined. The City fi~ds
that Cohdition eleven on page 7 requires the
Developer to ensure the provision of adequate
buffers as required by the EIR. '
b. The protection ,of Palmer's Ericameria can be
assured through by areas preserved as op~n space in
the project and by revegetation in. conjunction with
the 11-acrerevegetation plan presently required
for Coastal Sage Scrub. The City finds that
conditions of previously adopted Resolution P-90-34
require such protective measures as identified in
the EIR.
c. The EIR requires protection of a minimum of,
approximately 250 acres of Coastal Sage Scrub to
consist of a combination of on-site revegetation.
RTTM 89-13-R results in preservation of
approximately 201 acres of Coastal Sage Scrub on-
site. This is 14 acres less than the 215 acres of
on-site preservation originally anticipated. When
ini tially consulted, Mr, Scheidt concluded that
this six percent deviation was in substantial
conformance with the EIR in light of the 46 acres
of revegetation indicated in the CUP. These
measures would be in conjunction with 25 acres of
off-site mitigation as identified in the EIR.
Because of comments received by City staff
concerning Coastal Sage Scrub revegetation, Mr,
Scheidt was requested to provide addi tional
information as to alternative ways that the Project
could comply with the mitigation requirements of
the EIR. Mr. Scheidt informed the City in the
attached letter dated November 16, 1990, that 2:1
'.
.
.'
14'00
Resolution No. P- 90-91
page 3
mitigation off-site would be an acceptable
alternative to the 46-acre revegetation plan, The
City concurs with Mr. Scheidt's conclusions and has
required compliance with Condition 5 on Page 6 to
imp.lement this position in order to assu-re
compliance with the mitigation identified iri the
EIR.
Mr. Scheidt is of the oplnlon that so long as the
above concerns are addressed, RTTM 89-13-Rand the
CUP are in"conformance with the approved map and in
substantial compliance with the Certified Final
EIR. The City has evaluated" Mr. Scheid,t's
concerns, agrees with his assessment and has
concluded that the conditions referenced above
assur,e implementation of the mitigation measures
identified in the EIR.
3. City Staff has further analyzed RTTM 89-13-R. and the CUP
and concluded that there are no changes in the proj ect
that may have a sign,ificant effe,ct on the environment
which would require additional environmental review. The
Following illustrates some of the changes in the Project
that were specifically reviewed by City Staff:
a. The Project .will have the option to create a number
of 1 1/2:2 cut slopes, The possibility of such
slopes is, discussed in the EIR. ' ' Additional
conditions have been placed oil the Project in order
to ensure that the EIR mitigation measures for such
slopes are implemented;
b. The changes to the Coastal. Sage Scrub restoration
plan discussed above. '
c. The Realignment and width change in Old Coach Road:
(1) The southern end ,of Old Coach 'Road will be
moved to the east to make a four-way
signalized intersection' with Espola in order
to improve traffic flow;, This realignment
will not have any adverse imp'act on traffic,
The City has also reviewed and compared the
areas disturbed by the o~iginal road alignment
and by the new road alignment and determined
that the new road alignment does not result in
a net loss of sensitive biological habitat
were compared to the impact of the original
road alignment.
.
.
1401
Resolution No. p-90-91
Page 4
(2) The width of improvements for a portion of 01d
Coach Road will be reduced. ,This reduction
was implemented in order to lessen impacts on
riparian and oak woodland habitat along
Sycamore Creek. The City has determined that
this change will not have any adverse impacts
on traffic or safety. The City has also
reviewed the change and determined that such a
reduction will lessen impacts to sensitive
biological habitats.
d. Private, road alignments:
(1) A private road in the vicinity of the fire
state. That road services lots 6-13" The
City has determined that this change could
haye adverse environmental impacts. The City
and the Developer have agreed to exclude this
change from the approval of RTTM 89-13-R. The
referenced private road alignment will be as
shown on TTM 89-13.
(2) A private road parallel to Tam O'Shanter Drive
will be realigned, The City has, reviewed this
realignment and determined that it will not
result in additional adverse impacts to other
residences, will not alter the traffic flow or
safety of the road and will not result in a
net loss of sensitive biological habitat.
(3) The access road to lots 95-109 will be
realigned to curve from .west to east, as
oppos,ed to the previous alignment curving from
east to west. This change reduces grading and
the potential for fill slopes, does not change
the traffic or safety features of the road and
will not result in a net loss of sensitive
biological habitat.
e. The ,19th fairway and 20th tee of the Golf Course
will be shifted to the west to lessen impacts to
the sensitive habitat contained in Sycamore Creek.
This requires the relocation of lots 73-78 and 94.
The City has reviewed these changes and has
concluded that this relocation results in benefits
to riparian habitat along Sycamore Creek and
reduces grading to the northern portion of the
Project. The additional impacts of the increased
grading and visual impacts created by the
relocation are not significant impacts, will be
mitigated by the mitigation measures identified in
.
.
.. ..
1402
Resolution No. P- 90-91
Page 5
the EIR and are outweighed by the environmental
benefits attained by such relocation.
f. Some pad elevations of lots will be altered as a
result of the new street realignments. The higher
elevations of some of the lqts is offset by
additional open space between the existing homes
and the future building sites. In no case is the
open, space buffer any less than 50 feet. This
change does not result in any net increase in
impacts to s~nsitive biological habitats, or have a
potential to increase significantly the visual
impacts of the Project.
g. Some lots ,will be located on slopes in excess of
25%. In order to implement the mitigation measures
identified in the EIR for lots located on such
slopes , City Staff has recommended condition 13
under Planning Services which gives the Developer
options for mitigating such potential impacts. The
City has concluded that this condition implements
the mitigation of these steep slopes as required by
the EIR.
h. The EIR's worst case analysis of the Golf Course
identified 133 acres within the Golf Course
envelope as natural native vegetation, This is
implemented in the Golf Course as identified in the
CUP through approximately 107 acres of undi.:;;turbed
natural vegetation with approximately 26 additional
acres of revegetated open space. Grading and
revegetation will be monitored by a qualified
biOlogist. As such, the City' finds that the
impacts and resulting open space will be as
identified in the EIR.
i. The City recognized that the Developer is agreeing
in the Development Agreement to size certain
improvements, including, but not limited to, sewer
and water, to serve specified adjacent properties.
The City has determined that such improvements will
not induce growth in these areas which have
alternative means of obtaining such services, but
will simply assist the City's planning efforts by
allowing for the proper structure and location of
such improvements and preventing the need for
subsequent destruction of property and sensitive
habitat by expanding the size of such improvements
at a later date,
.
.
140.3
"
Resolution No. P- 90-91
Page 6
j . The Ci,ty recognizes that the s,ubsequent ,use of
reclaimed water and construct,ion of reclamation
facilities may result from' t.he implementation of
this Project. Because the ,availability of
reclaimed water" and the location of reclaimed
water facilities, and thus the location of
Developers reclaimed water lines and other
improvements, are uncerta~n, en~ironmental review
of these ~mprovements is too speculative to occur
at this time, As a result, the determination of
whether there is a need for environmental analysis,
and any 'necessary environmental analysis, will
occur when some of the above uncertainties have
been resolved and a meaningful environmental
determination is possible.
4. The City has thoroughly reviewed RTTM. 89-13-R and tte CUP
and examined all changes to the ,proj ect including, but
not limited to" those changes referenced above.
S. The City her~by finds that RTTM 89-13-R does not
represent a substantial change in the, project which will
require major revisions of the EIR que to the involvement
of new significant environmental impacts not covered in
the EIR.
6. The City hereby ,finds that the ErR analyzed the worst
case scenario for environmental impacts associated with
the Golf Course and that the Golf Course presented in the
CUP substantiar~y conforms to the analysis contained in
the EIR and does not include any changes in the
anticipated design of the Golf Course that will cause
sign1ficant enVironmental impacts not analyzed in the
EIR.
7. The City is familiar with the area in which the Project
is contemplated and hereby finds that there has, been no
substantial change with respect to the circumstances
under which the project is being undertakeh which will
require major revisions in the EIR.
Section.2: Findinqs:
Tentative Tract Map 89-13R
1. The proposed proj ect will be consIstent with the existing
general plan and there is a reasonable probability that
the project will be consistent with the proposed general
plan because that document is being prepared with full
knowledge of Specific Plan 89-01 which was written
specifically for this proj ect. The uses set for,th in
.
.
1404
Resolution No. P-90-91
Page 7
Specific plan 89-01 will be designated as appropriate
uses for this site.
2. The tentative tract map is consistent with all applicable
general and specific plans; in that the proposed land use
will be a development consisting of a golf course and
single~family residences on lots one acre or more in size
and policy 18.a in the Land Use Element of the General
Plan states that the Old Coach Area should be oriented to
rural residential land uses or a resort or recreational
facility that would include a variety of residential and
recreational, uses such as golf courses and equestrian
centers. The project is in compliance with the adopted
Old Coach Golf Estates planned Community Specific plan
89-01 which was prepared specifically for this
development. -
3. The design or improvements of the tentative tract map is
consistent with all applicable general and specific
plans; in that the number and configuration of the 157
lots meet the property development standards and special
requirements and conditions contained wi thin Specific
Plan 89-01,
4. The site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed; in that the site, is located within
an area of predominantly single-family residential
development and that the map has been designed to
substantially observe the natural contours of the
landform and avoid impacts on sensitive riparian habitat.
5. The site is physically suitable for the density of the
development proposed; because each lot meets or exceeds
the minimum acreage required by the development
provisions and conditions of approval of specific plan
89-01 and overall density is consistent with the slope
criteria contained in the General Plan.
6. The' design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
environmental damage or avoidable injury to humans and
wildlife or their habitats, because large tracts of
undeve19ped land rich in natural resources will be
preserved on-site and the condit-ions of approval and
mi tigation measures of the proj ect I s Final EIR assure
that any potential impacts associated with the proposed
development will be mitigated.
7. The tentative tract map is not likely to cause serious
public ,health problems because City water' and sewer
service will be provided to all lots within the
subdivision,
.
.
1405
Resolution No. P- 90-91
page 8
8. The design of the tentative tract map will not conflict
with any easement acquired by the public at large, now or
record, for 'access' through or use of the property within
the :proposed subdivision.
9. The effect of s~bdivision approval on the housing needs
of the San Diego "region has'been considered and balanced
against the: pUblic service needs of poway residents and
available fis'cal and environmental resources.
10. The design of the subdivision has provided, to the extent
feasible, for Juture passive or natural heating or
cooling opportunities in the subdivision.
Conditional Use Permit 90-13
1. The location, size, design and operating characteristics
of the golf course will be compatibie with and will not
adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent
uses in that:
a. Tees and greens are sited so as to minimize the
potential for golf balls to be directed toward
adj a'cent single-family homes.
b. The driying range and cl"ubho"use facility are
located at the center of the" site more than 1,050
feet' from the closest existing home in the area and
490 feet away from the closest proposed building
pad.
c. The golf course layout is designed to maximize golf
course views for adj acent property and such views
are commonly believed to enhance property value.
2. The, scale, bulk, coverage, and density is consistent with
adjacent uses in that the golf course is a use which will
preserve large areas of open space and the clubhouse
facility is .located at the center of the site, well
removed from adj acent residences which will eliminate
potential impacts.
3 .
There are available public facilities, services, and
utilities for the golf course, in that sewer' capaci,ty
have been previously reserved for the proj ect and the
Ci ty' s existing water supply from the County Water
Author.ity Aqueduct will be adequate for the immediate
irrigation needs of the golf course. Conditions of
approval require the future use of reclaimed water from
the San pasqual Water Reclamation Facility when a
sufficient supply becomes available from that sdurce.
.
.
.
1406
Resolution No. P- 90-91
Page 9
4. 'There, will not be a harmful effect ,upon desirable
neighborhood characteristics in that golf course views,
are commonly believed to enhance property values and the
cofnrnercial clul5house and driving range uses are
physically separated from existing and future residential
(see No.1 above). '
5. The generation of. traffic will not adversely impact
surrounding streets in that street improvements
(including a widening of old Coach Road and a traffic
signal" a.t OI(t'Cpach and Espola ),iden:tif;i.ed by the traffic
study ,perform5!<tby P&D Technologi!,!s:I:nc., and further
refined by city engineering staff will be provided
concurrent with the development of, the proj ecL
6. Th'e site is suitable for the type, and intensity of the
golf cou,rse development in thllt the golf cO)lrse is
primarily a use which serves to prese~ve open spacea,nd
the more. intense commercial uses of clubhouse and driving
range will be located at the center of the property on
land 'with a slope of less than 1~ percent which has been
previously disturbed.
7. That there will not be significant' harmful effects upon
environmental quality and resources in that 'all
appli:cable mitigation measures identified by the Final
EIR for Old COach Golf Estates will he impleme!1ted
through' the prgposed conditions of appr()va,l and on May
15, 199.0 the City Council found that these measures'
reduced impacts to below a level of significance.
8. That there are no other relevant negattve impacts of the
proposed use which cannot be mitigated 'in that the
condi tions.,of approval contain mi tigationmeasures which
address all pote"ntial adverse impacts'.
9. That the' impacts as described above and the location of
the proposed use will not adversely affect the City of
pm-iai General pla'n for future. or present development
be'causepolicy 18. a in the Land Use Element of the
General plan specifically mentions a golf course or
recreational/resort. facility as a sui table use for the
old coach special study area.
Section 3: City Council Decision:
The City CounciJ, ,hereby approves revised Tentative Tract Map
89-13R and Conditional Use Permit 90.-13 subject to the
following conditions:
L Within 30 days of approval (1) The Applica,nt, shall submit
in writing that all conditions of apprOval have been r.ead
and understood ; and (2)' the property owner shall execute
a Covenant on Real property . .
.
.
1407
Resolution No. p-90- 91
page 10
2. The use conditionally granted by this permit shall not be
conducted in .such a manner as to interfere with the
reasonable Use and enjoyment of surrounding residential
and commercial uses except as amended herein.
3. The project shall meet all requir,ements set forth
in City Council Resolutions P~O-34, P90-097, .hich
contain conditions of approval for Tentative Tract
Map 89-13 and Specific plan 89-01, except as
amended herein.
4. The project shall implement all of the mitigation
measures and. monitoring requirements identified in the
Final EIRfor Old Coach Golf Estates (Sch #90010015) and
nothing conta~ned in the documents or plans submitted for
TTM 89-13R or CUP 90-13 shall be construed as
constitu'ting a waiver of the mitigation measures required
by the Final EIR for Old Coach Golf Estates.
APPLICANT SHAL.J:. C01ITA.,CT THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall
submit a surface and ground water protection program designed
to reduce surface runoff and prevent infiltration of
fertilizers and pesticides into Lake Hodges and the water
table underlying the project site. The applicant shall pay
the necessary plan check fees required for the City to have
the program reviewed by a qualified soils/agricultural
engineer.
2. Prior to issuance of any building or grading permits for the
clubhouse, d r i v ing ran'ge, tennis court, pool, and related
commercial and reclCeational facilities, a development review
permit shall ,be approved by City Council. The development
review submittal must contain a parking analysis to address
the specific commercial and recreational uses proposed.
3. The grading plans shall be revised to eliminate slopes with an
inclination of 1 1/2:1 or greater. The Planning Director and
the City Engineer may approve specific 1 1/2:1 slopes if the
following conditions are met:
a. The slopes are determined to be necessary to avoid
disturbance of unique geological features (such as
significant rock outcrops or steep canyons) or biological
resources (such as mature oak trees or sensitive plant
species).
b. Five to six feet high retaining walls may be required for
any 1 1/2:1 slopes to provide maximum reduction in the
gradient and the area of slope face.
"
.
.
.
1408
Resolution No. p- 90- 91
Page 11
c. A .detailed re?egetation plan shall be prepared for any
proposed 1 1/2:1 slopes, Special measures such as the
use of fibre matting may be required. The revegetation
plan shall be approved by the Director of Planning
Services prior to issuance of grad'ing permits. '
4. The private road adjacent to Lot 5 shall be realigned to
substantially match the alignment originally approved on TTM
89-13 .
5. The revised map and, conditional use permit show that a minimum
of 201 acres of undisturbed coastal sage scrub will be
retained on-site,. The mitigation measures contained in the
Final EIR for Old Coa'ch Golf Estates required no less than 215
acres to be preserved on-site, that 'an additional 11 acres be
revegetated in coastal sage scrub and another 24 acres be
preserved either on or off-site in order to provide a total of
250 acres.
In order ,to implement the approved mitigation measures,
additional coastal 'sage scrub habitat must be preserved by
this project. The applicant may select one of the following
three options:
a. Revise the grading to preserve an additional 14 acres of
coastal sage scrub contiguous to open space currently
shown on the map.
b. Purchase 28 off~site acres of high quality coastal sage
scrub in addition to the 24 acres required by the Final
EIR.
c. Restore 43 acres of coastal sage on-stte. Prior to the
City's acceptance of this option, the revegetation site
plan and planting plan must be approved by a qualified
expert with a proven record in habitat restorat:i.on. ,A
five year monitoring program and ISO percent bonding of
the construction cost will be required.
Should the applicant revise grading to preserve additional
open space but not enough to total 14 acres, the Pla1lliirig
Director may approve a plan whereby the off-site or
revegetation requirements are reduced proportionately.
6. No grading permit for this project shall be granted until a
plan for providing the mitigation des-cribed in No.5 above is
in place and approved by the Planning Director.
7. Any mature oak trees which will be affected by grading for
this project shall be shown on the required Master plan of
existing trees and be assessed by the City for transplantation
and inclusion in the permanent landscaping for the project.
"
.
.
.
1409
:l'
Resolution No. P- 90-91
Page 12
8. The landscaping plans for the golf course shall include a low
flow irrigation system to water trees and shrubs.
9. Th~ applicant shall revise the grading plan toeliminpte any
retaining walls which exceed six feet in height. A request
for variance or amendment to Specific plan 89-01 may be
submitted for action by City Council, where over-height walls
serve to preserve significant natural features or reduce slope
height.
10. The rock enclosures within Archaeological Site SD.i11, S22
shall be incorporated in an open space easement prior to final
map recordation. The limits of the easement shall be subject
to, approval by the project archaeologist, 'This easement shall
be clearly shown on the grading plans and grading design shall
be modified as necessary to avoid disturbance of this
archaeological respurce.
11 . The location of required biological open ,space easements shall
be clearly shown on the grading plans prior .;to issuance of any
grading permits. These easements include the 100 foot buffer
from the edge of the riparian forest canopy and the 25 foot
buffer from the outer edge of the oak woodland canopy dripline
as required by the EIR,
12. The m~n~ park site shall be removed from the map and
incorporated into Opeh Space Lot E,
13. This approval shpll become null and void if building permits
are not issued for this project in accordance with the time
lines set forth on Page 4 of the Development Agreement.
14. Lots which are located in areas within an underlying slope of
25 percent or greater shall inco.rporate multiple fOundations
wi.th a, minimum separation of five feet. The Director of
Planning Services may approve alternative methods which reduce
slope height such as changing the building pad elevation or
adjacent street grade, reducing building pad size or use of
retaini_ng walls under six feet in height provided these
techniques reduce slope height to 25 feet or less.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. All adopted conditions of approval of the underlying tract map
shall be satisfied except as amended herein.
2. Developer shall modify existing access to the fire station
from Espola Road. Said modification shall include the
regrading pnd re-lil1ldscaping of the driveway' and parking area
to eliminate steep grades and allow adeqLiate turnaround ar.eas.
3. Developer shall install a switch in the fire station and
additional "'Opticbm" to control the Espola Road and Old Coach
. .
'.
.
.
.
>
1410
Resolution No. P- 90-91
page 13
Raad traffic signal to. provide protected left turn access to.
and from Espala Road for emergency vehicles.
4. Developer shall process a boundary adjustment through the
Engineering 'Services Department. The Certificate of
Compliance shall be recorded prior to. final map approval.
5. Prior to any ,rough graqe approval, if it is faund that the
golf course irrigation needs cannot be met by graund water
only, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the
City af Powayfar.use of untreated water from the Aqueduct.
The City presently has'the rights to 2.5 Cubic Feet per S~cand
(CFS) fram the Water Authority. StaneRidge Golf Course has a
seniar agreement with 'the City for use of the water.. Old
Caach Estates shall be entitled to the excess water available
up to. 2.5 CFS.
6. The developer shall design and canstruct a water system for
the transportation of reclaimed water from the Sanpasqual
Reclamatian Plan to the project. Said construction shall be
complete wi thin six months of availability af reclaimed water.
T. The applicant shall enter into a contract with the aperators
af the San Pasqual Reclaimed Water Facility far service of
reclaimed water when it becomes available. When reclaimed
water becomes aVailable i this praj ect !'Iill be required to
relinquish the use of the aqueduct except in emergencies.
8. Street impravements on Old Coach Road shall be made in
accordance with City Ordinance standards for Semi-Rural
Streets Lacal Collector with the exceptian of pavement width
which shall be 28 feet curb-to-curb. Sidewalk on one side af
Old Coach Road (public portion) shall be requir~d in addition
to cancrete curbs and gutters on both sides (public par,tian).
A 35 mile per hour design speed will be used in the geometric
design of the roadway. Paved turnouts will be provided at
regular intervals in locations approved by the Director af
Engineering Services.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Paway,
State of California, this 27th day of November 1990.
(21 ~ -~
Don ~san, I Qyor
ATTEST:
'1'-1 '
o I ICt \ \~'L'
Marjorie K.
k ') Lo. i---'~ Ce...
Wahlsten, City Clerk
"
.:~ '
. '
.
.
1411
-.
Resolution No. p-90-91
Page 14
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SS.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
I, Marjorie K. Wahlsten, City Clerk of the City of Poway, do
hereby certify, under the penalty of perjury, that the foregoing
Resolution, No. P-90_-91 .' was duly adopted by the City Council
at a meeting of said City Council held on the 27th day of _
November , 1990, and that it was so adopted by the following
vote:
AYES: BRANNON, EMERY, GOLDSMlTH, HIGGINSON
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: KRUSE
'-fl.'\{,2'~'L K' JU((.I,-;lL,~
Marjorie K,. wahlsten, City Clerk
City <;>f\poway
"-._1
REPORT\lTTM8913R.RES