Covenant Regarding Real Property 1990-164699
-;' J'~.
REGbRDING REQUEST 'BY,:
CITY OF PDWAY
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLER~
.CITY OFPOWAY
P.O.. 'BOX, 789
POWAY" ,CA92064
No: Transfer; Tax Due
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
)
9 O. q,4'.6'9'9
r- HE:COrWft j',-'1
fOFf.JCfALTf[C~JfHJ--S t
Hif SA:i iHf.(zD UJf;tn :Y~ ~l,!
/
..
.
18'60
90HAR2 8A1'l!!.:! ,
, \lERA LLYI2Ej
I co', 'NT,\I p"C""r'E'" "
'.J.,. j .._ '" ." ,.... f\ .,'~
~.~," '~..o..;}.
(;This space for' Recerder's use)
m..F.'..'
A
MG
COVENANT REGARDING: REAL PROPERTY
,. The V1Cic!ic Co,rporat,io,n, a CaJiforrJia corporat,ion ,("OWNER" hereinafter) is
the ownecef rea{ pr;opert,y described'in ExhibHA wtiich is a:ttachEfd her,etoand
made a part ,hereefari{\'ih.ich ls,corrrnon1'y koowo :as ~sesser 's Par~e 1 Nunjber
275~231-'Ol ("RROPERTY" .herei nafter)., In considerat\gn'o:F t.be approval .of
VarjJlnce, 89-18 bY ttieC;,ty of .Poway (:"CJTY"here.i~af.ter)\ OWNERherebycevenants
and agrees; for the oenefit of'the' CITY, t.o 'abide bY''condftions .of the attached
resofut.iqn '(Exhibit B)., '
ThisC,evenant shall. run wilh the land ,and be bi!l.d,ing upon and inure t'o the
oenefit.of the future .owners; 'encumbrancer;g?!lccessors, hei,rs, persoriaJ
representatives, transfer'eesandassigns of tlie respective parties.
In the event thCitVariance,89-18 expires or ,is :r:escinded by City Council at
the reque.!?t of the',OWNE'R" CI'TVsha 11 expunge thtS Covenant from the record till e
Of thePROPERiIX.
If eHher par,ty is required to incur costs teenferce the previsiens .of this'
Cevenant', the prev.ailing p'arty shaI1 beentilled te, full reimbursement of 0311
costs, inc1 udingr/lasenab 1 e attorneys' fees, fremthe' ettierparty. The CITY may
assign te persens impacted. by t,h~ p,flrfenminge .of this 'Ce,venant the right te
enfor:ce'this Cevenant against: OWNER.
Da,ted:
-3-/.5- '7D
~k~
OW~ER,
(No'tarizel
~~~
Dated: :t~ /~i 1190
CITY OFPOWAY
BYW/o.A.. "(;J~1!:.-+- (j}~C~:c-
No need te.,Net rize
- "\'
T
, c
,
.
(,
.
"
1861
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ORDER NO. 30-17547-03
:PARCEL 1:
All of the North 16.37 acres of Lot 1 in Section 35, Township 13 South,
Range,.2 .West, San Bernardino~ridian, in the County of San Diego, State
of 'Caloiforriia, according to UnIted States Govermnent Survey.
EXC,EPTING> the:refr.om that portion of said land noW lying, within the
bound"ry of, Valle Del 'Norte Unit No.1, 'according to Map thereof No,
,46,38, fil~d in the Office of the County Recorder of Said San Diego
'County on:Sep,tember 28, 1990.
ALSO'EXCEPTING therefrom that portion described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the Westerly line of said Lot 1 with
theSoutheily line of the Nor.th 16 ;37 acres of said Lot 1; thence' ,along
the 'Westerly line of saj,d Lot 1, Ngr,th 1'3019'00" East, 240.17 feet;
thenc'e South 89009'20" East, 252. 70 feet; thence South '000,50'40" Wes::',
'234,5.0 feet, ,more or less, to the .intersection with the Southerly line of
the North' 16'.'37 acres of said Lot 1 ; thence along saidSou::.herly line,
Nor,::.h 8'9009'20;' West, 304.57 fee::', 'more or less, to the Point of Beginning,
ALSO' EXCEPTING therefo~ that portion conveyed to the City of San Diego,
on April 21, 1981 as File No. 81-120307 described as 'follows:
Beginning at the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 1; thence along the
Northerly line of said Lot 1 'South 89024 '30'" East 10.24 feet to point
"A" of. this description; thence South 13003' 18" West 201. 72 feet to a
tangent 2551 foot ,radius ,curve, concave Westerly, thence ?outherly along
said' curve through a central angle of 5004'30" a distance of. 225,96 feet
to the, Westerly line of said Lot 1; thence along said Westerly line North
13003'18" ,East 425.16 feet to the Point of Beginning,
PARCEL 2:
An ,easement for .road purposes oV,er 'the Westerly 60,00 feet of that
portion of the North 16,37 ,"cres of 'Lot 1 in Sectio'n 35, Township 13
South, Range 2 West, San.Bernardino ~ridian. in the County of San
Diego, St~te of California, according to United States Government Survey,
described.as foflows: Beginning at the intersection of the Westerly line
o'f s:>id Lo't 1 with the ,Souther,ly l:ine of the, North 16 . 37 acres of "said
Lot '1; thence .along the westerlY line of said Lot~, North 13019'00"
Eas::', 240,17 feet; thence South 89009'20" East, 252'.70 feet; thence
South 00050,'40" West, 2:34.50 feet, more or less, to. the intersection
with the Southerly line of the North 16,37 acres of said Lot 1; thence'
along said Southerly line, North 89009'20" West, 304,57' f'eet, more or
'les's, to 'the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
SF,25,
.
@] ','
SAFECe ,
)
* ,* .. *' * * '*, *
~ this the
); ss.
)
* * * * .*. *
1862
* * -. .* ..
* * .. .. * * * * .. *
19 _, before me,
"'J( 'k )fJ.* i ,f *" "k' *' '* "w it'. ~.w '*
,,to' Staieof
.
· Ccluntyof
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
'.
.
.
.
.
.'
.
the undersigned Notary PUblic, personally appeared
,
.
.,
.
.
. I
.
. i
*;~ I
.
.
. I
.'
. I
.'
.:
.,
.
.
day of
,
D'personallY known to me
o .prove(i to me on 'the basis of satisfactory evidence
tobeth~person (s) Wh6sename'(s) subscribed
to the within instrument, and 'acknowledged that
executed it.
WI'rnESS my hand and offiCial seal.
Notary's Signature
.- -* * * -* * * -* * -* * -* -* * * * * -* . -* * '. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* ~ * * * -* * *
.pARrnERSHIP'~
* *.~~ * * i *. * ~ * ... * .". -* * . * * * * * * * .' * -. ~ * *:,* -* * -* * ~ * * * *
· State of On this the day of 19 _,
* ) SS.
· .Gounty of )
** * .. .* ,. * ,;
before ,me, ·
'" '
.
the. undersigned Notary' Public, personally appeared
, '.
.
. "
'. ,
,
.'
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.'
.'
.
.
.
.
.
· Notary's Signature
-* * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * . * * * * * * * * -* -* -* -* * * . -* -* * * -* . * *.. * *, *~
o personally known to me
o ,'proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) who'executed the within instrument
ori behalf of the partilership, and acknowledged to me that
the partnership executed it.
wiTNESS my hand and official seal.
CXlRPC1RATE ~'
. * -* * -* -* * -* * * * * -* *
.~tate of tAUF
.
.
'.
'.
CoVE"nA;1' .A?E(;:/9Il"O,rtlG-, A!CBL /~o;<:'cle,-ry ,
* * * * *~.. ~~ .* -* -* *-72 -* -* '. -* .. ,* -* *...* -* * ,~ -* -* ~', *, ."!* .. *
On thJ.S the /.5 -day of . /77.4X'c/-I ;19 90 , . before' me,
) ss. ~ 0"
) '- fiJ-r#V' (/7~'CkA1W
the undel:siglled Notary ,~lic, personally appea.r;ed
{/iAolc-
"
.
.'
.
,
.
.
" .
.
.
.
I){f' proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to ·
'Ee the, wrsonf)il:) who executed 'the within, ins~~ as .
J?'ft?e..5 /cI RA r er SA behalf of' the corporation ,.
therein narred, and ackilowledged to me that the corporation .
'executed it. ' ..
WrWESS my hand and pffic,ial seal. ' ..
~ '-~~~ :.
Notary' sSigna ,re .
* ~ ~ * * * * * i.. *.* * * * * * ... * ~ * * * * * * * . * .
//7lfr€
Gounty of SJ:Jn DirGe
.
.
.
.
.
.
*
.
.
.
.
.
.
. *;'. * . .. * '. ~ * * * . . * * .
B
pe1:30dlu.l,l, ,J.,.uuwu 't:.O 'me
~' .. '. - ,OFFICIAL SEAL
,.' ...... CAntY BROKAW .
, :' . Notary P\JIlllo.CaIilomia
; ';'" , SAN DIEGO COUNTY
. '.
..' ~ CGmm. Eltp. May 14,1993
( 6/&~ i
.!t:
I.'
r
[
f'" "
,
,.....
,'"
l
,^
..
....)
c.
(e
1863
RESOLUTION NO. P- :90-14
A RES.oLUTI.oN .oF THE CITy-c.oUNCIL
OF THE CIT,Y .oF POWAY, GAl'IFORNIA
APPROV.ING. VARIANCE 8'9-18' , ,
ASSESSORi'SpAkcEL NUMBER 275-231-01
WHj:REAS" Vari.ance 89-18 ,sul:lmitted by Michael V) a.ciJC ,appli cant, requests
app,.rova)of aten:foot vari<!n~,e to the requi red mi,nimu.m~!ideyard setback' for the
prop.er;-tyl ocat_~d',on Lot 20(CHyof poway Tract 88-07, at the western terminus
o,f Indian Traili nthe RR-C (Rural Residential C) zone ; and
WHEREAS, on Febrliary 13, 1990,the City COUncil held a dlJiyadverttsed
pUb,]'ic hearing-to' so I feit conmentS from the publ i c, both pro and con, re 1 at i ve
to UiH' app1'i cit ion.
",
NOW; ,.THEREFORE , the city Council of the City o,f Powaydoes hereby'r,esolveas'
fo 11 ows:
-: .~
Sect,i on. 1: Envi'ronmental, Fi ndi ngs:
This project' is categoricaily exempt under the proviSions of CEQA (Class 3).
'-. .
Section 2: Finaings:
1. There are speci(l,lcfrcumstances appl'icable to the property (size,
shape, topography, location; and surroundlngs) , or the intended use of
the propertY, and .because of this, the sttictappl ication of the Zoning
Ordinance depriVes the property of privileges enjoyed by other proper-
ties in 'the vic-inity under identical zoning classifications. The sub-
jectsingle-family home would observe" the same side yard setbacks as
the majority, of,older homes in the Green Valley area which were built
to aID - 15 foot mi n.imums.tandardunder County zoning criteria, and
there are seven homes in the inmedi ate nei ghborhood. which observes imi-
I ar, sf de yard setbacks .
2.' ,Granting the variance". or,"its .!!]odl'Hcation, is necessary for 'the pre-
se"I'Vation ifnd'er(joYmeil't .ofa substantial property right possessed by
other property in the same vicinity and ione,'ao,ci den.ied t!l th.epr'operty
for which the variance Ts sought in that the ,housenee,ds tobe'p_osi-
tioned wlthin, a .narrow building eny!!!ope bounded on three sides by a
massive boulder outcrop.
3,. Granting fh,e variance" or its mOd,if1catfon; ,wlll not bematel'iaJ ly
detrimen'tal to the pUbl1c.hea1'th, safety orwe.Lfare, or injurious to
the property or improvements i nsuch vJC',i nlty and zone in whi ch the
propert,y is located in that the,h'6ri1ewiT;1 meet all requi'rem~,~ts under
the uniform building code, and allo,ther Municipal Code standards.
4,. G'rant i"g of thi s variance does not constitute a speci a I pri vi i ege incon-
siste~t wtth the. ]'lmHations upon other properties in the vicinity and
zone 1n whichsu!=h property is situated in,that other residenc~s in the
inmediate vtc.inity have been constructed observing similar setbacks.
"
J
r
l
tEL
I............,
.......
I... .~_
.".
,...
(.
(e
1864
,Resolution No. P- 90-14
Page 2
5. The granti ng of thi s vari ance does not allow a use or acti vi ty whi ch is
not 'otherwise expreSSly authorized by the zoning regulation governing
the parcel of property, in that a single-family residence is a per-
mitted structure.
6. Granting the variance or its modification will not be incompatible with
the poway General Plan in that this is a residential use of the prop-
erty, and part of an in-fill project,
~
Within 30 days of approval;: (1) The appl icant shall s,ubmit in writing that
all conditions of approval have be,en read and understood; and (2) the prop-
erty owner shall execute a Covenant on Real Property,
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, SERVICES REGARDING COMPLIANCE
WITH TilE FOLLOWING CONDHIONS: ' "
SITE DEVELOPMENT
1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the ap~roved site plans on file
in the Planning Services Department and the condifiori's contained herein.
2. Prior to any use of the project site all conditions of approval contained
herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning
Services.
3. The variance approval shall expire on February 13, 1992.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Poway, State or
California- this 13ttl-day of Febru-ary,f990.
Cl~ \~
Don Higginson, ayor
ATTEST:
.~~~ k' /\JMtJ,~
Marjorie Ki, Wah,lsten, City Clerk
~