Loading...
Res 309RESOLUTION NO. 309 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFOP~NIA ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR MITIGATION OF TRAFFIC IMPACTS RESULTING FROM THE NEW DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, within the City of Poway many thousands of acres of land will be developed through procedures as prescribed by the Subdivision Map Act, State of California Government Code Section 66410 et seq; and WHEREAS, within the City of Poway many acres of land will be developed through procedures prescribed by the City's building permit process; and WHEREAS, such development of properties facilitates development having an impact on the infrastructure of the City of Poway including traffic impacts to public roads and bridges; and WHEREJtS, the City Engineer has identified the roads and bridges that will be impacted by the traffic impact of new development within the City of Poway; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has determined and calculated cost to mitigate the traffic impacts created by new development through the construction or reconstruction of roadways, bridges and traffic signals; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has determined that traffic impacts created by new development is directly related to the daily vehicle trips generated by the new development, and calculated from vehicle trip generation factors deemed applicable by the City Engineer as obtained from the latest publication of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, San Diego Association of Governments, City of San Diego, and others which are deemed appropriate; and WHEREAS, the City Council through the Environmental Impact Review process as provided within the California Environmental Quality Act, State of California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. must specifically add conditions to a proposed project to mitigate the traffic impact on the community's infrastructure prior to approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolution No. 99 establishing conditions for mitigation of Environmental Impacts resulting from division of property through parcel maps; and WHEREAS, the failure to impose such conditions would adversely impact the health, safety, and welfare of all residents of the City of Poway. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: RESOLUTION NO. 309 Page 2 Section 1. Mitigation Conditions. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $66.00 per vehicle trip shall be required as a condition of approval of a final map or a building permit, notwithstanding additional requirements of the Subdivision Map Act or City Council. The Traffic Mitigation Fee required shall be the fee that is in effect at the time of the approval of the final map or receipt of a building permit. The vehicle trips per development shall be in accordance with "City of Poway-Trip Generation Factors" per Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution. Property being developed under the building permit process, i.e., con- versions, renovations, remodels, etc. shall only be assessed a Traffic Mitigation Fee if the cost of the modification is at least 50% of the market value of the property prior to the modification. Section 2. Time of Payment. Traffic Impact Mitigation Fees shall be payable at the time of City Council approval of the final map. If property is being developed without the aid of a final map then the Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee shall be payable at the issuance of a building permit. PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Poway, California at a regular meeting thereof this 5th day of October, 1982. ~ry Shep~rdson, May ATTEST: Marj e K. Wahlsten, City Clerk EXHIBIT A USE Recommended Weekday Trip Generatior~ Rates Summary (Vehicle-Trips) · R~CO~R,~NDED WEEKDAY TRIP GENERATION RATE sidential Multi-Family Units ~ Single Family Dwellings Retirement. Senior Citizen Housing Mobile Homes Centers - Regional Shopping Center: Over 1,250,000 0 1,000,000 - 1,249,~99 0 500,000 - 999,999 0 225,000 - 499,999 0 Community Shopping Center Neighborhood Shopping Center Grocery Store Convenience Store Freestanding Retail/Strip Commercial 8 trips/D.U.1 10 trips/D.U 1 .4.5 grips/D.U.2 5.5 trips/D.U.1 30 trips/i,000 02,3 35 trips/i,000 01,2 38 trips/i,000 ~ 60 trips/1,O00 75 trips/i,000 01 160 trips/i,000 ~1 200 trips/1,OOO'B1 430 trips/i,000 02 40 trips/i,000 B1 staurants - Quality Restaurant (low turnover) lit-down Restaurant (medium turnover) Restaurant (high turnover) Fast-food Restaurant fices - Large Commercial Offige (over 100,000 0) Small Commercial Office (under 100,000 B) Governmental Office Medical Office sitor Serving Commercial - Hotels/Motel Tourist Con~nercial/Commercial Recreation her Commercial - Car Dealer Gasoline Service Station nancial Institutions - Savings & Loan Bank 56 trips/i,000 03,5 200 trips/I,000 01 370 trips/i,000 01 770 trips/1,O00 01,2 16 trips/i,000 BI / 20 trips/i,000 01 40 trips/I,000 ~4 90 trips/I,000 01 10 trips/room3 200-500 trips/acrel,2,3,6 58 trips/i,000 01 130 trips/pump5 74 trips/i,000 03 250 trips/i,000 01,2,3,5 5 trips/acre1 ALTERNATE RATE 900 trips/acre1 1,600 trips/acre~ 2,000 trips/acre1 3,600 trips/acre2 400 trips/acre1 300 trips/acre1 800 trips/acrel 500 trips/acre2,3 400 trips/acre1 750 trips/station5 340 tri?s/drive-th~ tellerx USE. dustrial - F£COI~iENDED WEEKDAY TRIP GENERATION RATE Large Industrial (over 100,000 ~ or over 8 acres) 8 trips/i,000 ~1 Small Industrial (under 100,000 ~ and under 8 acres) 19 trips/i,000 gl Industrial/Business Park (over 100,000 ~ or ove~ 8 acres) Industrial/Business Park (under 100,000 ~ and under 8 acres) Warehousing 12 trips/i,000 ~1 20 trips/I,000 91 6 trips/I,000 ~2 House ob Worship (Church or Synagogue) 60 trips/acre4 ALTERNATE RATE 100 trips/acre~ 140 trips/acre1 200 trips/acre1 200 trips/acre1 44 trips/acre2 300 trips/ institution4 Hospital Convalescent Hospital ucation - 221trips/bedl -3 trips/bed2 School Junior High School (Middle School) Grade School 1.5 trips/student1 1.0 trip/student2 · 1.0 trip/student2 Park (undeveloped) Park (developed) Golf Course Lake (with boating) Sports Facilities Racquetball/Tennis/Health Club 5 triPs/acre1 40 trips/acre1 6 trips/acre4 50 trips/l~000 ft. · shoreline· ~ trip/attendee1 40 trips/courtl 6 trips/acre1 '42 trips/acre1 300 trips/acre1 45 trips/I,000 I lSANDAG/CALTRAN% San Diego Traffic Generators (1971-1981). 2Arizona Department of Transportation, Trip Generation Intensity Factors (1/1/79 version). 3I.T.E., Trip Generation (1979). &CALTRANS District 4, Trip Ends Generation Research Counts (1975-1979). 5COMSI$, ~uick Response Urban Travel Estimation Techniques and Transferable Parameters, KCHRP Report #187 (1978). 6A range is shown due to the wide variety of land uses associated with this category. See the Definitions of Land Use Categories for Trip Generation Purposes" for additional information.