Loading...
Res P-11-24RESOLUTION NO. P -11 -24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING VARIANCE 11 -01 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 275 - 610 -13 WHEREAS, Variance (VAR) 11 -01, submitted by Rich and Jan Baldwin, requests approval to allow the construction of an attached, 90- square -foot addition to the existing single - family home located at 16466 Branco Lane to observe a 23 -foot, 6 -inch front yard setback where 40 feet is required in the Rural Residential C (RR -C) zone; and WHEREAS, on September 6, 2011, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing to solicit comments from the public, both pro and con, relative to this application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Poway as follows: Section 1: The City Council finds that the proposed project is Categorically Exempt as Class 1 and Class 5 Categorical Exemptions from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Sections 15301 and 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines, in that the project involves construction of a minor residential addition and a minor alteration to a land use limitation. Section 2 : The findings, in accordance with Section 17.50.050 of the Poway Municipal Code (PMC), to approve VAR 11 -01 to allow the construction of an attached, 90- square -foot addition to the existing single - family home located at 16466 Bronco Lane in the RR -C zone to observe a 23 -foot, 6 -inch front yard setback, as shown on approved plans on file at the Development Services Department, are made'as follows: A. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property and because of this the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity with the identical zoning classification. The special circumstances are that the subject lot is substandard in size (0.55 acres compared to the standard one -acre minimum lot size of the RR -C zone); and the home, which is legal non - conforming in terms of front yard setback (observing a front yard setback varying from 22.5 to 24.5 feet as approved by San Diego County at the time it was built compared to the current 40 -foot front yard setback of the RR -C zone); and B. Granting the Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right enjoyed by other property owners in the same vicinity and zone and not afforded to the property for which the Variance is sought because the developable area of the lot, in conjunction with the layout of the existing residence, allows the property owner to make a logical addition to the house like other properties in the area; and Resolution No. P -11 -24 Page 2 C. Granting the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare in the vicinity in that the encroachment into the front yard setback will not extend beyond the existing roofed area, the visibility of the addition would be limited because the highest portion of the addition is lower in elevation than the Bronco Lane street level, an entry bridge extending from Bronco Lane to the front entry of the house would further obscure the view of the addition, and the addition will not detract from the neighborhood; and D. That the granting of this Variance does not constitute a special privilege that is inconsistent with the limitation upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in that the Variance will allow a living space addition to a single - family residence that is allowable in this zone; and E. Granting the Variance would not allow a use or activity not otherwise expressly authorized by the RR -C zone because single - family residences are permitted in this zone; and F. That the proposed Variance will be compatible with the City's General Plan because the use is permitted and the addition does not result in an increase in residential density. Section 3 : The City Council hereby approves VAR 11 -01, to allow the construction of an attached, 90- square -foot addition to the existing single - family located at 16466 Bronco Lane in the RR -C zone to observe a 23 -foot 6 -inch front yard setback, as shown on approved plans on file at the Development Services Department. The approval is subject to the following conditions: A. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney's fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit, including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification. In the event of such election, applicant shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney's fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and applicant regarding litigation issues, the City shall have authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter. However, the applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by applicant. B. Approval of this Variance shall apply only to the subject project, and shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. Resolution No. P -11 -24 Page 3 C. Within 30 days of approval, the applicant shall submit in writing that all conditions of approval have been read and understood. D. The Variance granted by this approval shall not be conducted in such a manner as to interfere with the reasonable use and enjoyment of surrounding residential uses. E. Development on the site must comply with the Poway Noise Ordinance (Chapter 8.08 PMC). Construction work is specifically regulated by PMC 8.08.100, which states that it is unlawful to operate any single or combination of powered construction equipment at any construction site before 7 :00 a.m. or after 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, or at any time on a Sunday or holiday, except as provided in PMC 8.08.100. F. The applicant shall obtain a Building Permit prior to construction. The building plans shall be consistent with the approved stamped plans on file in the Development Services Department. Grading shall be in accordance with the City Grading Ordinance, approved soils report, and grading practices acceptable to the City. G. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall request and receive a final inspection from the City. Section 4 : The approval of Variance 11 -01 shall expire on September 6, 2013, at 5:00 p.m. unless a Building Permit has been issued, and construction or use of the property in reliance on this permit has commenced prior to its expiration. PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Poway, State of California, this 6th day of September 2011. ATTEST: A. Yroyan, MMC City Clerk Resolution No. P -11 -24 Page 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Poway, do hereby certify, under the penalty of perjury, that the foregoing Resolution No. P- 11 -24, was duly adopted by the City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on the 6th day of September 2011, and that it was so adopted by the following vote: AYES: BOYACK, GROSCH, MULLIN, CUNNINGHAM, HIGGINSON NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE DISQUALIFIED: NONE p.A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk of Poway