Loading...
Res 87-043RESOLUTION NO. 87-043 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE POWAY CITY LIGHTING DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1987-88 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Poway, California desires to levy and collect assessments within the Poway City Lighting District for the purpose of maintaining, servicing and operating public lighting facilities in the City of Poway as shown in the attached Exhibit A, pursuant to the Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, the public interest and convenience requires the maintenance, service and operation of the public lighting facilities within the City of Poway. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Poway does hereby resolve as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and the City Council so finds and determines. 2. Proposed assessments for 1987-88 are as detailed in the Engineer's Report for Poway City Lighting District for the fiscal year 1987-88, Exhibit B. 3. Pursuant to the Streets and Highways Code, a public hearing will be held on June 2, 1987 in the City Council Chambers at City Hall to consider the levy and collection of the proposed assessments. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED at a regular meeting this 12thday of May, 1987. ATTEST: Marjor~e '~K. Wahlsten, City Clerk ! ! ./ \ I ! / I I Twin Peaks ~['Garden I ~ iPOWAY CiTY LIGHTING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES EXHIBIT 'A' ~ CITY LIGMTING DISTRIC~ ~qGII~.R' S FISCAL YEAR 1987-88 PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to present findings and the ~ngineering analysis for the Poway City Street Lighting District for the 1987-88 fiscsl y~r. This Lighting District, utilizing direct benefit assessments, finances the cost of providing mintenance and operation of public street lighting facilities within the City. The District contains all the territory within the boundaries of the City of Poway. FINDINGS The City Ommcil of the City of Poway om May 12, 1986, initially formed the Poway City Street Lighting District and confirmed assessmlents for the first fiscal ymmr, 1986-87. This report covers the levy of the annual assessments for the 1987-88 fisom3 y~r and provides for annexations of additional City area into the Lighting District. There are no properties to be annexed into the District for the 1987-88 fiscml y~r. The public street lighting syst~n in the Lighting District is both SDG&E-owned and City-owned and will consist of approximately 1,543 lights, as shown below: SDG&E LIGHTS IB I-A-Wooden Pole No. Wmtts~e 732 100 W 67 250 W Type of Light H. P. Sodi~n Vapor H.P. Sodium Vapor LSI-(l~crete Pole 89 100 W 14 250 W 1 400 W H.P. Sodium Vapor H.P. Sodium Vapor H.P. Sodium Vapor -1- CITY OF PGWAY LIGHTS No. Wattage 101 175 W 29 400 W 228 100 w 1 150 W 126 250 W 110 90 W 45 180 W Type of Light Mercury Vapor Mercury Vapor H.P. Sodi~n Vapor H.P. Sodium Vapor H.P. Sodium Vapor L.P. Sodium Vapor L.P. Sodium Vapor Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Gode, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of Assessment Districts by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvem~ts which include mintenance and operation of str~ lights. The 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. Section 22573 provides that: The net ~m%ount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any form,,]~ or method which fairly distributes the net amount along all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel frc~a the improve~?_nts. The Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by r~ons of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improv~nents, the various ar~-~ will receive different degrees of benefit frsm the improvement" (S & H S22574) Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax." The 1972 Act provides that the total cost Mn be recovered in the assessment spread incl,~4{ng incidental expenses. The latter Gan include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing and all other costs identified with the district proceedings. The 1987-88 fiscal y~r expenditures for street lighting are estimated as follows: Street Light Energy And M~ ntenance fDsts Operations and Maintenance ~ergy Gosts TOTAL City Incidental Gosts city Administration $ 25,000.00 $190,000.00 $215,000.00 $ 18,000.00 fDPprocessing (County of San Diego)$ 1,000.00 O~nsultant Engineering $ 20,000.00 TOTAL $ 39,000.00 GRAND TOTAL The revenues avai!_~ble are shown below: $215,000.00 $ 39r000.00 $254,000.00 A~sessments FY 1987-88 Gounty of San Diego Ad Valor~ Tax Estimated Surplus frcm FY 1986-87 $137,198.00 70,000.00 47r272.00 254,470.00 flgGINm~.R/NG ANALYSIS Name The District is entitled "Poway City Lighting District." The boundaries of the proposed assessment district are as shown on the Assessment Diagram. (See Attachment A. ) A31 parcels identified in the latest San Diego Gounty Assessor's Parcel Maps within the City, are included in the District excerpting frc~ the assessment of said oosts and expenses within the area desribed, the area of public roadways, alleys, green- belts, and parkways and property being used for public purposes. The property lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Lighting District is shown in detail on the G~unty of San Diego Assessor' s maps, on file in the Gounty Assessor' s office, 1600 Pacific Highway, Rocml 103, San Diego, G~ 92101. -3- Facilities The facilities or improvements are sts_nd~rds, their a~purte~ances, esergy operate them. BENEFIT ANALYSIS defined as street light and maintenance costs to A11 parcels in the district derive benefits frcm strc~ lighting and the methodology used fairly distributes the cost of the system in r~ltion to the benefits received. There are approximately 11,700 parcels of property in the District, and two benefit zones for assessment Durposes are established as follows: Those parcels that are directly serviced by public street lights or by lights in the in~ediate vicinity and therefore recieve direct benefit. Those parcels that do not receive direct benefit due to the absence of public street lights in the inm~diate vicinity of the parcel. The benefits of street lighting accrue as c~unity benefits and as individual or service benefits. C~L,L~nity benefits are ~efined as those o~,.,on to all persons holding and/or using real property as they use public streets and pedestrian ways for access throughout the lighted ar~ of the City of Poway. Indivic%,~l or service benefits, are defined as those particular to a person holding and/or using a r~l property parcel that is directly serviced by street lighting at, or in the ~,,~,~diate vicinity of the parcel. Therefore, those parcels in Zone A are assessed for both c~L,~nity benefits and individual benefits wher~s those ?_rcels in Zone B are assessed only a ~uL.~unity benefit. The methodology for the benefit assessment for the Poway Street Lighting District is ~onsistent with the benefit structure currently applied to those aree_~ of the City of Poway now serviced under the (/~nty of San Diego Street Lighting District This structure is based en the determination that the benefits of street lighting for each real property parcel are a function of the traffic generated by the use of that parcel. P.~nefit units are then calculated for each parcel using a benefit factor ~lerived frem the land use/traffic generation functions. -4- Derivation of Benefit Factor Benefit factors have b~-~n determined for all land use cmtegories as defined in Attad,,,',ent B. A benefit factor of 1.0 is assigned to single family residential !and use. Benefit factors for all other land use c~tegories ere then derived in proportion to land use/traffic generation as um~-~ared to the single family residential traffic generation rate of 10.1 trips per dwelling unit, or 36.4 trips per acre. Traffic generation rates by l~nd use are as prepared by the San Diego Association of Goverrm~=-nts and (IALTRANS, District 11, based on trip generation st,~a~es done in the San Diego region and are presently being used by the (bunt Lighting District to cmlculate these assessments. The derivation of benefit factors for all land use categories other than single family residential follows. All factors above 0.5 are rounded to the n~rest whole number. Apts or Multi Family 6 trips/D U. 10.1 trips/D.U. 1.0 Omndos 8 trips/D.U. 10.1 trips/D.U. 1.0 All C~L,~Lercial Office and Store Buildings 359.1 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 10 Re~iorm] Shopping 494 trips/acre Oemter 14 36.4 trips/acre C~,~nity Shopping Om~ter 800 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 22 Neighborhood Shopping = 1200 trips/acre Om~ter 33 36.4 trips/acre -5- Hotel, Motel, Parking Lot and c~rage, Used ~r Lot, Theater Bowling Alley, B~taur- ant, _car Wash and Large Chain Grocery or Drug Stores. --These <.3.~u~_rcial establishments service um~,LLunities; therefore they are the same as a OuL,~Lonity shopping center. 800 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 22 Service Station Medial and Dental Offices and Animal Hospitals Hospitals, O~valescent Hospitals and Rest Hcmes = Service Stations functiom~lly tend to serve neighborhoods, as a store like 7-11, etc; therefore, it is considered the same as a neighborhood shopping center. 1200 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 33 -- These cc~nercial es~m_blishments are service oriented in the same manner as medical offices, therefore the land use is the same as medical offices. 905.2 trips/acre 25 36.4 trips/acre 210.4 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre Mobile Hcme Parks 4 6 trips/D.U. 10.1 trips/D.U. 0.5 Auto Sales and Service Agency Radio and T.V. Station, Drank 400 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre Factory--light manufacturing 40 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre -6- Factory--heavy manufacturing, extra- active, mining 120 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre Farmland, Rural Iand, Agricultural Preserve 2 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 0.1 (~,r~hes and Meeting Fa] ls Oane~ry, Mausoleum and Mort~ary = Churches and meeting halls generate about the same amount of traffic as public buildings, such as schools, etc. 60 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre = Oaneteries, mausoleums and mort,~ries geneate about the same number of trips as rural land, farm]and, etc. 5 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 0.1 School, Library, Public Building, ect. 50 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 1.0 Golf Courses 8 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 0.2 Gsmeral R~=creation Parks & Cm~ps 38.4 trips/acre 26.4 trips/acre -7- Vaunt Land = Vacant land geneates only a ncminal number of trips as ccmpared to single family residential, and therefore, vaunt l~nd receives little or no benefit frcm strcct lights. Vaunt land was assigned a 0.0 land use factor. Benefit factors for all l~nd use c~tegories, as derived above, are ~ahulated in Attad..'L%ent C. C~lculation of Benefit units Benefit factors are extended to benefit units for assessment by multiplying the benefit factor by the number of dwelling units per parcel or the acreage of the parcel as appropriate. This base calculation is appli~hle to all parcels that accrue both u~f,¥Lunity benefits and service benefits, as previously defined. ApPromtmately one-third of all parcels in the City of Poway do not, however, receive service benefits. An adjustment in base benefit units, then must be made to reflect c~.t~unity benefits only. For this purpose, it is assumed that one-fourth of total benefits accrue as cu~%unity benefits and three-fourths accrue as service benefits. Therefore, a c~'.L~nity benefit of 0.25 is applied to the benefit factors for all developed parcels not directly serviced by street lighting. The adjusted benefit factors then are extended as noted above. Vacant parcels are not assessed. Using current available data frcm the San Diego ODunty Assessor, an estimate of aggregate benefit units by land use type has bccn u~.~uted using the described method. These estimates are ~hulated in Attad.,~-~ent D. Based upon the previous discussion, it is proposed in FY 1987-88, that the base benefit charge be $15.00. Thus, for u~-,unity benefits, $3.75 will be charged and for service benefits, $11.25. In s~,,ery, those parcels in Zone A will be assessed $15.00 per benefit unit and those parcels in Zone B will be assessed $3.75 per benefit unit. -8- AT~A~m~NT A POWAY CITY LIGHTING DISTRIC~ BOUNDARY MAP Available at: Public Services D~partment CITY OF PGWAY 13325 Civic Center Drive Poway, O% 92064 -9- AT~A~r B LAND USE OCDES 09 mobilehcme 10 vaunt residential 11 single family residence 12 duplex or double 13 multiple 2 to 4 units or 2 houses 14 multiple 5 to 30 units 15 multiple 31 to 60 units 16 multiple 61 units and up 17 oon_a _~niniu~ 18 co-op 19 miscellaneous IRRIGATED 50 vacant (water available) 51 citrus 52 avocados 53 vines 54 misc. 55 livestock 56 poultry 57 misc. irrigated crops 58 growing houses 59 special or misc. N3RAL LAND (NON-IRRIGATED) 20 vaunt ou~,~rcial 61 21 1 to 3 story misc. store bldgs. 62 22 4 story & up office & store bldgs.63 23 regio~l shopping center 64 24 c~,.~unity shopping center 65 25 neighborhood shopping center 26 hotel, motel 27 service station 28 medical, dental, animal hospital 70 29 cony. hosp., rest hcme 71 30 office condcminit~as 72 31 parking lot, garage, used mr lot 73 32 trailor park 74 33 theater 75 34 bowling alley 76 35 restaurant 77 36 mr wash 79 37 grocery or drug - large chain 38 auto sales and service agency 39 misc., radio station, bank, etc. 40 vacant industrial 41 fact@-y - light manu. 42 facetry - heavy manu. 43 warehousing - processing or stg. 44 b~,lk storage (~mnks, etc.) 45 extractive & mining 46 ~nall automotive garages 47 industrial condcmini~ns 49 special, misc. 1-10 acres 11-40 acres 41-160 acres 161-360 acres 361 acres and up INSTITdTIONAL vacant institutional daurch parking or related c~netery mort,~ry public bldg. (firehouse, schl., lib. ) h pi l special or miscellaneous ~(5~ATIONAL 80 vacant recreational 81 .n~cting hall, gym 82 golf course 83 marina, docks 84 recreational ~ps 85 non-tax-hie (always 9-85) 86 open space easements 87 agricultural prsv. (not under contract) 88 agricultural prsv. (under contract ) 89 special-misc. 90 vacant ta~ahle - govt.owned 91 improved ta~hle- govt. owne prop. -10- Benefit Factor 0.5 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.1 10 10 14 22 33 22 33 25 06 22 0.3 22 22 22 22 22 11 0.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 49 Benefit Factors by Land Use Land Use Benefit Factor Land Use trailor space vacant residential single family residential duplex or double residential residential 2-4 units residential 5-30 units residential 31-60 units residential 61 units cond(mlini~ co-op 0ol misc. residential vacant O~L,L~r cial 1-3 story office or store 4 story and up office or store regional shopping center o~.t~nity shopping center neighborhood shopping center hotel, motel service station medical, dental, animal hospital cony. hospital, rest h~ne Prkg. lot, garage, used Mr lot trailor park theater bowling alley restaurant car ~sh large cba~ n grocery or drug misc. u~,,,~rcial (radio station, bank) vacant industrial factory - light manufacturing factory - heavy manufacturing ~arehouse bulk storage mining small autcmotive garage misc. industrial 0.0 50 va_~__nt irrigated 0.1 51 citrus 0.1 52 avocados 0.1 53 vines 0.1 54 misc. trees 0.1 55 livestock 0.1 56 poultry 0.1 57 misc. irrigated crops 0.1 58 growing houses 59 misc. irrigated farm 0.1 61 non-irrig. 1-10 0.1 62 non-irrig. 11-40 AC 0.1 63 non-irrig. 41-160 AC 0.1 64 non-irrig. 161-130 AC 0.1 65 non-irrig. 361 AC and up 0.0 70 vacant institutional 0.0 71 church 1.0 72 church prkg. or relate 0.1 73 cenetery 0.1 74 mausoleum 0.1 75 mort,,~ry 1.0 76 public bldg. (firehouse, school, library) 6.0 77 hospital 1.0 79 misc. institutional 0.0 80 vaca~nt recreational 2.0 81 meeting hall, gym 0.2 82 golf course 0.4 83 marina, docks 1.0 84 recreational camps 0.0 85 non-ta~hle recreation 0.0 86 open space ~.~ements 0.1 87 agric, preserve (not under contract) 0.1 88 agric, preserve (under contract) 1.0 89 misc. recreational 0.0 90 taxable gov.prpty,vaca 1.0 91 taxable gov. prpty, improved ATTACHM~IT D ESTIMATED B~qEFIT LAND USE ZONE A UNIT DISTRTRUTION ZONEB Parcels W/Lighting Paroels WO/Lighting (Benefit units ) (Benefit units ) B~sidential 4490 6139 (4678) (3343) CuL,,~rcial 249 40 ( 2882 ) (195) Industrial 10 3 (17) (2) Farm/R, lral 557 12 (598) (5) Institutional 29 2 (52) (1) Recreational 31 53 (29) (16) Uncod~d 64 (0) TOT~ 5430 6249 (8256) (3562) PIANS SPECIFI C~TICI%]S P0~AY CITY LIGHT1/qG DISTRIC~ FOR FISCAL YEAR 87-88 TO establish benefit assessments for maintenance of street lighting systens developing !and parcels in the City of Poway. the operation and in developed and Description: Street lighting systems in the proposed assessment district consist of both Sa Diego C~ & Electric-owned and City of Poway- owned lights as of this date, as shown below: LSI-A-Wooden Pole No. Wattage 732 100 W 67 250 W 799 Type of Light H.P. Sodium Vapor H.P. Sodi~n Vapor IBI-Goncrete Pole 89 100 W 14 250 W 1 400 W 104 Grand Total 903 H.P. Sodium Vapor H.P. Sodium Vapor H.P. Sodium Vapor No. Wattage 101 175 W 29 400 W 228 100 W 1 150 W 126 250 W 110 90 W 45 180 W 640 Type of Light Mercury Vapor Mercury Vapor H.P.Sodium Vapor H.P. Sodium Vapor H.P. Sodium Vapor L.P. Sodium Vapor L.P. Sodium Vapor -13- Scope of Work San Diego C-~.~ & Electric (SDG&E) sb~all be the supplier of electrical energy for all the above listed street lights as well as providing needed maintenance and replacenents for those street lights owned by SDG&E. The City of Poway shall provide ~mint~w~nce and replacenent needs for those City-owned street lights. Oosts for electrical energy charges and maintenance of SDG&E- owned street lights shall be billed to the City by SDG&E. The City shall disburse payments to SDG&E fr~n a City account es~mhlished for the Poway City Lighting District. O0sts incurred by the City in maintaining City-owned street leights sb~ll be paid frcm the account. Oosts incurred by the City for: Administration; engineering; operations and other related requirenents shall be paid frc~n the account. Respectfully sukmitted, gO~n D. Archibald, P. E. Director of Public Services/City Engineer R.C.E. No. 21869 D~te -14 - STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) I, Marjorie K. Wahlsten, City Clerk of the City of Poway, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a~n).eeting of said City Council held on the 12th day of May , 19 ~Y, and that it was so adopted by the following vote: AYES: Brannon, Emery, Higginson, Kruse, Tarzy NOES: None ABSTAIN :None ABSENT: None Marjorie K'% Wahlsten, City Clerk City of ~o~ay 5/K/Certify