Loading...
Memorandum of Understanding 1994-0163889C Recording Requested by and When Recorded Mail to: CITY CLERK CITY OF POWAY P.O. BOX 789 POWAY, CA 92075 -0789 4z # 1994 1 QJ r- Q 14-'MAR-1994 08 ._2 AN OFFICIAL RECORDS SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER55 OFFICE GREGORY SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER FEES: 0.00 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING [Poway Corporate Center] This Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") is entered into as of V�eWwa.N , 19940, by and between TECH BUSINESS CENTER, a California general partnership ( "Developer ") and the City of Poway°( "City") with reference to the following facts: RECITALS A. Developer, as successor in interest to American Newland Associates ( "American Newland "), is the owner and developer of real property located in the City of Poway, County of San Diego, California, known as the Poway Corporate Center (Poway Tech Center West) ( "Project "), and more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Project consists of approximately 160 acres and is a portion of South Poway Business Park. B. On or about February 27, 1990, the City Council of City ( "City Council ") approved and adopted Resolution No. P -90 -20 approving, subject to certain conditions set forth therein, Tentative Tract Map 86- 02R(2) ("TTM 86- 02R(2)11) for development of the Project. C. On March 20, 1990, pursuant to Sewer Condition No. 6 set forth in Resolution No. P -89 -116, American Newland applied to City for a Letter of Availability of Sewer Service ( "LOA ") and posted with City a reservation fee equal to $102,721.60, which amount equals twenty percent (20 %) of the appropriate sewerage connection fee, based upon available capacity. Poway issued LOA No. 226 to American Newland on March 23, 1990, and LOA No. 226 was executed by the City on October 4, 1993. Developer paid an additional $154,082.40, which amount equals thirty percent (30 %) of such sewerage connection fee, on July 30, 1991. Thus, a total of fifty percent (50 %) of such sewerage connection fee has been paid as of the date of this MOU, for a total of $256,804, which shall be credited against the final sewerage connection fee for the Project. BPHSD \EBS \0056552.04 02/04/94 0 0 733 D. City Ordinance No. 83 governs the reservation of sewerage capacity and the payment of connection fees for service. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 83 provides: "Where applicant's project is a tentative tract or parcel map, it shall be subject to all provisions of this ordinance except the time limitations of Section 1.2. In such case, the City shall represent in the LOA that sewerage availability is assured for applicant's project for a period of time equal to the time of expiration of the tentative map." City represented in LOA No. 226 that the LOA would expire on February 27, 1992 unless extended pursuant to the provisions of the Ordinance. By payment of the additional fees described above, LOA No. 226 has been extended. Section 4.2 of Ordinance No. 83 provides that an applicant for an extension of an LOA shall pay an additional reservation fee for sewerage connection. E. On December 11, 1990, the City adopted Ordinance No. 331 approving the execution of the Poway Corporate Center Development Agreement ( "Development Agreement ") between the City and Developer. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 33, the Development Agreement was to be effective upon the effective date of the Ordinance. Ordinance No. 330 became effective on January 10, 1991. Section 4 of the Development Agreement provides that, pursuant to Government Code Section 66452.6(a), the Tentative Tract Map for the Project [TTM 86- 02R(2)] shall be extended so that the Tentative Tract Map shall remain valid for a period equal to the Term of the Development Agreement, as it may be extended. The Term of the Development Agreement is defined to be ten (10) years from the date of execution of the Development Agreement (which 10 -year period expires on January 10, 2001), provided that such 10 -year period may be extended as follows: (1) for up to five (5) additional years in order to complete construction of the Project, and (2) in addition, for any period development of the Project has been prevented due to Enforced Delays (as defined in the Development Agreement). F. Developer has requested written acknowledgement of extension of TTM 86- 02R(2) and LOA No. 226 for the duration of the Term of the Development Agreement. A dispute arose between the City and Developer concerning whether Developer is required to proceed through the public hearing process before the City Council in order to obtain extension of TTM 86- 02R(2) and LOA No. 226, and whether Developer need pay the additional reservation fees for sewerage connection required by Ordinance No. 83 when an LOA is extended. BPHSD \EBS \0056552.04 02/04/94 -2- 0 734 G. It is the intent of the City and Developer, by entering into this MOU, to settle and resolve amicably this dispute. Developer and City now desire to memorialize their understanding with respect to extension of TTM 86- 02R(2) and LOA No. 226 and payment of additional reservation fees for sewerage connection for the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals set forth above, the provisions of the Development Agreement, and the mutual covenants set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. City hereby acknowledges that the duration of TTM 86- 02R(2) and LOA No. 226 shall continue for the Term of the Development Agreement, which shall expire on January 10, 2001 unless extended as described in Recital E above, plus the automatic two -year extension provided for under Government Code Section 66452.11 (Senate Bill No. 428, 1993 Stats. Chap. 407). 2. City hereby acknowledges that Developer has paid in full all required fees and has satisfied any obligation which may exist pursuant to this MOU, Resolution No. P- 90 -20, LOA No. 226 and /or Ordinance No. 83 pertaining to payment of reservation fees for sewerage capacity or sewerage connection fees prior to recordation of a final map for TTM 86- 02R(2). 3. Developer and City understand and agree that this MOU settles a dispute between the parties and clarifies the rights and responsibilities of the parties. It does not constitute either an amendment to the Development Agreement or an amendment to TTM 86- 02R(2), and the Development Agreement and TTM 86- 02R(2) shall remain in full force and effect. 4. Any notice or instrument required to be given or delivered to either party to this MOU may be given and delivered by depositing the same in the United States Mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid, addressed to: City: City of Poway P.O. Box 789 Poway, California 92074 -0789 Attn: James L. Bowersox, City Manager Developer: Tech Business Center 3575 Kenyon Street San Diego, CA 92110 Attn: Paul K. Tchang With a Copy To: Ellen B. Spellman, Esq. Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison 550 West C Street, Suite 1300 San Diego, CA 92101 BPHSD \EBS \0056552.04 02/04/94 -3- 0 735 5. If either party commences legal proceedings for any relief against the other party arising out of this MOU, the losing party shall pay the prevailing party's court costs and reasonable attorney's fees. 6. Developer shall have the right to assign its rights and obligations hereunder, in writing, to a successor owner of the Project, provided written notice of such assignment is delivered by Developer to City. In the event of such an assignment, Developer shall be relieved of all further obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Developer have executed this Memorandum of Understanding as of the date first written above. CITY: CITY OF POWAY By Don Higginson, or of the City of Poway ATTEST: Yhg�� )</- 7UAA-9�11 T[�-- Marjo ie K. Wahlsten, City C r APPRO#� D AS TO FORM AND SUBSTANCE: . Eckis, City BPHSD \EBS \0056552.04 02/04/94 -4- i • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OFa ) On �f before me, the undersign", a Notary Publi& in i4rd said State, pe sonally appeared L*L personally known tb me to be the person s whose name tsl'� subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that executed the same in ei authorized cah pac t es , and that by ham, ei signature on the instrument the person on, or the entity upon behalf of which the person to acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. MARSEAL IE LOHON Notary Public- Cdifomia SAN DIEGO COUNTY My Commias(on Expires •• A A 26,1994 Notary Public in and for Said State SPHSMEM005M52.04 02/04/94 -5- 736 DEVELOPER: TECH BUSINESS CENTER, a California general partnership By: Techbilt Construction Corp., a California cgiZporation, General Partner By: Paul Tcliang, President By: Bothwell International, Ltd., a California limited partnership, General Pa tner Neville Bothwell, General Partner BPHSD \EBS \0056552.04 02/0494 -6- 737 738 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF San Diego ) On March 3, 1994 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Paul K. Tchang , personally known to me (or proved *° me on the basis -t ..f..etery evidene ) to be the person W whose name W is /-a-re subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /41xe /tlay executed the same in his /hsw-/,their authorized capacity (ies) , and that by his /b r lthe Y_ signaturekes on the instrument the person W, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. .. „: � E t .i_ riLr s-Gi � �i-O cxp ;,Os STATE OF CALIFO ) COUNTY OF San Diego ) NoEry Publi in and for Said State On March 3, 1994 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Neville F. Bothwell , personally known to me ( f Gat s €actor •e) to be the person(* whose name (,fir) is /4-re subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /shejt?rMy executed the same in his/ authorized capacity (i,es) , and that by his /ker7lt e r signature (-V on the instrument the person(g), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. c Notary Public i and for Said State ¢ a'° OFFVAL .SAL ,!.;Ci.1! Ef�4CE Expire :ors ,a?'A' BPHSD \EBS \0056552.04 02/04/94 -7- EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE CITY OF POWAY, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24; THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25 AND THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, ALL BEING IN TOWNSHIP 14 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF POWAY, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. BPHSD \EBS \0056552.04 02/04/94 739