Res 88-058RESOLUTION NO. 88-058
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 87-1
TO BE COLLECTED ON THE PROPERTY ROLL
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988-89
WHEREAS, the City Council of Poway desires to have
Landscape Maintenance District Assessments collected on
the property tax roll; and
WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Poway City Council,
the amounts collected have been set forth in a public report
and the public has been allowed to comment on these amounts
and this action has been duly advertised as required by law;
and
WHEREAS, this action is authorized by the laws of the
State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
1. The sum of $194,572.45 is required to be collected
in accordance with the Engineer's Report (Attachment A), for
maintenance cost of Landscape and Maintenance District 87-1.
That said sum shall be collected on the 1988-89 San Diego
County Tax Roll to provide for maintenance costs of the
district.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED, by the City Council of
The City of Poway, California, at a regular meeting thereof
this 7th day of June 1988. ~~o~~-~
ATTEST:
Marjorie~ K. Wahlsten, City Clerk
Resolution No. 88- 058
Page 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
I, Marjorie K. Wahlsten, City Clerk of the City of Poway, do hereby certify
under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution, No. 88-058 , was duly
adopted by the City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on the 7th
day of June , 1988, and that it was so adopted by the followin vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Brannon, Higginson, Kruse, Tarzy, Emery
None
None
None
Marjorif ~. Wahlsten, City Clerk
City of ~,Po?ay
Resolution No. 88-058
Page 3
ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR
POWAY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT' DISTRICT NO. 87-1
FOR 1988-1989 FISCAL YEAR
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Report is to set forth findings and
engineering analysis for the Poway Landscape Maintenance
Assessment District No. 87-1 for 1988-1989 fiscal year.
The Assessment District was formed January 27, 1987 as a
means of financing the maintenance of landscape improvements
installed in conjunction with the Pomerado Business Park, the
boundary being as shown in Exhibit A.
FINDINGS
The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits the establish-
ment of assessment districts by cities for the purpose of
providing for the maintenance of certain public improvements
which includes the facilities existing within the subject
assessment district, the 1972 Act requires that maintenance
assessments be livied according to benefit rather than
according to estimated value. Section 22573 states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon
lands within an assessment district
may be apportioned by any formula or
method which fairly distributes the
net amount among all assessable lots
or parcels in proportion to the
estimated benefit to be received by
each such lot or parcel from the
improvements."
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
Facilities
The facilities to be maintained are shown on the approved
landscaping plans for the project and are briefly described
as follows:
Roadway medians in Pomerado Road, South Poway Parkway,
and Community Road, soundwalls, retaining walls, and
adjacent parkways along Pomerado Road; detention
basins; equestrian trails and equestrian staging areas.
The Landscaping plans are incorporated in the Report by reference.
ATTACHMENT A
Resolution No. 88-058
Page 4
Engineer's Report
Page 2
Cost Estimate
It is anticipated that landscaping will be accepted for maintenance
in late fiscal year 1988-1989 or early fiscal year 1989-1990.
Therefore, the assessments must be collected in fiscal year 1988-
1989. The estimates for a six-month maintenance period are
$194,570 (Exhibit "C").
Assessment Diagram
The boundary of the proposed Assessment District and the individual
parcels are shown on Exhibit A. The following areas are excluded
from assessments for the district:
Ail public streets, public avenues, public lanes,
public roads, public drives, public courts, public
alleys, public righ-of-ways, all public parks,
greenbelts and parkways, and all public school
property used for public school purposes.
Method of Assessment
In order to provide an equitable assessment, 50% of the cost way
distributed evenly over all the lots. The remaining 50% was then
approtioned to the lots based on their net usable acreage. The
calculations are shown in tabulated fo~m on Exhibit B, along with
the corresponding assessor parcels.
Respectfully submitted,
ALAN D. ARCHIBALD
Director of Public Services
City of Poway
Registered Civil Engineer No. 21869
DATE
Resolution No.88-051i~
EXHIBIT' "A" Page 5
Resolution No. ~{8-058
Page 6
Parcel No.
317-221-11
12
13
14
15
16
17
317-223-01
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
02
-- 03
04
317-222-19
24
23
20
22
21
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
01
02
03
O4
05
O6
07
08
09
10
Lot
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Net
Pad
Area
3.505
3.210
15.007
6.339
2.133
1.731
1.856
2.435
1.930
.697
.644
.527
.521
.579
.860
.643
.444
.426
.558
.623
.667
7.241
3.104
3.141
2.461
3.945
3.670
1.379
1.141
1.084
1.064
1.558
1.753
3.300
3.222
3.140
2.914
3.126
3.602
5.532
6.359
4.175
3.184
2.681
2.547
120.658
EXHIBIT "B"
Percentage of
Total Area
2.90
2.66
12.44
5.25
1.77
1.43
1.54
2.02
1.60
.58
.53
.44
.43
.48
.71
.53
.37
.35
.46
.52
.55
6.00
2.57
2.60
2.04
3.27
3.04
1.14
.95
.90
.88
1.29
1.46
2.74
2.67
2.60
2.42
2.59
2.99
4.58
5.27
3.46
2.64
2.22
2.11
50%
Divided
~qually
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
2,161.89
50%
Per
Acre Total
2,826.04
2,588.18
12,099.95
5,111.05
1,719.81
1,395.68
1,496.47
1,963.31
1,556.13
561.98
519.25
424.91
420.08
466.84
693.41
518.44
357.99
343.48
449.81
502.32
537.79
5,838.33
2,502.72
2,532.55
1,984.27
3,180.80
2,959.07
1,111.87
919.97
874.02
857.89
1,256.20
1,415.84
2,660.75
2~597.86
2.531.74
2.349.52
2.520.45
2904.25
4 460.68
5 127.18
3 366.25
2 567.22
2 161.66
2,053.61
4,987.9.3
4,750.07
14,261.84
7,272.94
3,881.70
3,557.57
3,658.38
4,125.20
3,718.02
2,723.87
2,681.14
2,586.80
2,581.96
2,628.73
2,855.30
2,680.33
2,519.88
2,505.37
2,611.80
2,664.21
2,699.68
8,000.21
4,664.60
4,694.44
4,146.16
5,342.69
5,120.96
3,273.76
3,081.86
3,035.90
3,019.78
3,418.08
3,577.73
4,822.64
4,759.75
4,693.63
4,511.41
4,682.34
5,066.14
6,622.27
7,289.07
.5,528.14
4,729.11
4,323.54
4,215.50
$194,572.45
EXHIBIT "C"
Resolution No.88-058
Page 7