Loading...
Res 89-062RESOLUTION NO. 89-062 A REOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE POWAY CITY LIGHTING DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Poway, California desires to levy and collect assessments within the Poway City Lighting District for the purpose of maintaining, servicing, and operating public lighting faci- lities in the City of Poway as shown in the attached Exhibit A, pursuant to the Streets and Highways Code; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Poway does hereby resolve as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and the City Council so finds and determines. Proposed assessments for 1989-90 are as detailed in the Engineer's Report for Poway City Lighting District for the fiscal year 1989-90, Exhibit B. o Pursuant to the Streets and Highways Code, a public hearing will be held on June 6, 1989 in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, to consider the levy and collection of the proposed assessments. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED at a regular mee~i~qg this 9th day of May, Carl R. Kruse, Mayor ATTEST: Marjorie K~ Wahlsten, City Clerk STATE OF.~LIFORNIA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) I, Marjorie K. Wahlsten, City Clerk of the City of Poway, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution, No. 89-062, was duly adopted by the City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on the 9th day of May, 1989, and that it was so adopted by the following vote: AYES: EMERY, GOLDSMITH, HIGGINSON, KRUSE NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: BRANNON Marjorie ~. Wahlsten, City Clerk .City of Poway EXHIBIT A Resolution 89-062 ~e 2 } f \ I / ! I I I CITY OF POWAY STRRET I.IGHTING DISTRICT EXHIBIT B Resolution No. 89-062 Page 3 Engineer's Report Poway City Lighting District Fiscal Year 1989-90 Presented to: City of Poway April, 1989 CONSULTANTS, INC. Resolution No. 89-062 Page 4 POWAY CITY LIGHTING DISTRIC1~ ENGINEER'S REPORT FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to present findings and the engineering analysis for the Poway'(~ity Street Lighting District for the 1989-90 fiscal year. This Lighting District, utilizing direct benefit assessments, finances the cost of providing maintenance and operation of public street lighting facilities within the City. The District contains all the territory within the boundaries of the City of Poway. FINDINGS The City Council of the City of Poway on May 12, 1986, initially formed the Poway City Street Lighting District and confit'med assessments for the first two fiscal years, 1986-87 and 1987-88. Assessments were again confirmed by the City Council in June, 1988 for the 1988-89 fiscal year. This report covers the levy of the annual assessments for the 1989-90 fiscal year and provides for annexations of additional City area into the Lighting District. There are 239 properties to be annexed into the District for the 1989-90 fiscal year. The public street lighting system in the Lighting District is both San Diego Gas and Electric-owned and City-owned and will consist of approximately 1,942 lights, as shown on the next page. Resolution No. 89-062 Page 5 STREET LIGHT INVENTORY 1988-89 (From April 1, 1988 to March 1, 1989) SDG & E Lights Lights Energized Prior to 4/88 From 4/88 to 3/89 LS1-A-Wooden/Concrete Pole Wattage Type 4 3 90W 1 0 135W 2 0 180W 729 0 100W 63 0 250W LS1C-Concrete Pole 6 0 180W 6 0 100W 10 0 250W 1 0 400W CiW of Poway Lights Lights Energized Prior to 4/88 From 4/88 to 4/89 LS2A - Concrete Pole Wattage 13 0 35W 302 47 90W 54 0 135W 122 6 180W 258 0 100W L.P. Sodium Vapor LP. Sodium Vapor L.P. Sodium Vapor L.P. Sodium Vapor L.P. Sodium Vapor L.P. Sodium Vapor L.P. Sodium Vapor H.P. Sodium Vapor H.P. Sodium Vapor Total Type L.P. Sodium Vapor L.P. Sodium Vapor L.P. Sodium Vapor L.P. Sodium Vapor H.P. Sodium Vapor Updated Total To 3/89 7 ! 2 729 63 6 89 10 1 908 Updated Total To 3~9 13 349 54 128 258 Resolution No. 89-062 Page 6 4 0 150W H.P. Sodium Vapor 4 124 0 250W H.P. Sodium Vapor 124 4 0 310W H.P. Sodium Vapor 4 6 0 400W H.P. Sodium Vapor 6 69 0 175W Mercury Vapor 69 25 0 400W Mercury Vapor 25 Total 1,034 Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of Assessment Districts by Cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include maintenance and operation of street lights. The 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. Section 22573 provides that: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount along all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (California Streets and Highway Code Section 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax." Resolution No. 89-062 Page 7 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS The 1972 Act provides that the total cost can be recovered in the assessment spread including incidental expenses. The latter can include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing and all other costs identified w/th the district proceedings. The 1989-90 fiscal year expenditures for street lighting are estimated as follows: Street Light Energy and Maintenance Costs Capital Replacement Costs Operations and Maintenance Energy Costs SUBTOTAL $ 31,200.00 50,000.00 192,000.00 $273,200.00 $273,200.00 City Incidental Costs Computer Equipment City Administration EDP Processing and Map Update SUBTOTAL TOTAL COSTS $ 7,500.00 20,000.00 9.620.00 $ 37,120.00 $ 37,120.00 $310,320.00 Revenues Assessments Fiscal Year i989-90 Zone "A": (11,796 @ $15.00) Zone "B": (7,481 @ $3.75 Ad Valorem Tax TOTAL $176,940.00 28,054.00 105,330.00 $310,324.00 Resolution No. 89-062 Page 8 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS Name The District is entitled "Poway City Lighting District". Boundary_ The boundaries of the assessment district are as shown on the Assessment Diagram. (See Attachment A.) Ail parcels identified on the latest San Diego County Assessor's maps within the City of Poway are included in the district. However, public properties such as roadways, alleys, greenbelts, parkways, and other public properties are exempt from the asessment. The property lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Lighting District are shown in detail on the County of San Diego Assessor's maps, on file in the County Assessor's Office, 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 103, San Diego, CA 92101. Facilities The facilities or improvements are defined as street light standards, their appurtenances, and energy and maintenance costs to operate them. BENEFIT ANALYSIS There are approximately 12,933 parcels of property in the District, and two benefit zones for assessment purposes are established as follows: Resolution No. 89-062 Page 9 ZONE A: Zone A parcels are those that are directly serviced by public street lights or by lights in the immediate vicinity and therefore receive direct benefit. ZONE B: Zone B parcels are those that do not receive direct benefit due to the absence of public street lights in the immediate vicinity of the parcel. The benefits of street lighting accrue as community benefits and as individual or service benefits. Community benefits are defined as those common to all persons holding and/or using real property as they use public streets and pedestrian ways for access throughout the lighted areas of the City of Poway. Individual or service benefits are defined as those particular to a person holding and/or using a real property parcel that is directly serviced by street lighting at, or in the immediate vicinity of the parcel. Therefore, those parcels in Zone A are assessed for both community benefits and individual benefits whereas those parcels in Zone B are assessed only as a community benefit. The structure of the benefit assessments for the Poway Street Lighting District is based on the determination that the benefits of street lighting for each real property parcel are a function of the traffic generated by the use of that parcel. Benefit units are then calculated for each parcel, using a benefit factor derived from the land use/traffic generation functions. Derivation of Benefit Factor Benefit factors have been detemfined for those land use categories whose codes are shown in Attachment B. A benefit factor of 1.0 is assigned to single family residential land use. 6 Resolution No. 89-062 Page 10 Benefit factors for all other land use categories are then derived in proportion to land use/traffic generation as compared to the single family residential traffic generation rate of 10.1 trips per dwelling unit, or 36.4 trips per acre. Traffic generation rates by land use are as prepared by the San Diego Association of Governments and CALTRANS, District 11, based on trip generation studies done in the San Diego region in June, 1983 and are generally accepted for use by the San Diego County Lighting District and other lighting districts throughout the County to calculate these assessments. The derivation of benefit factors for all land use categories other than single family residential follows. All factors above 0.5 are rounded to the nearest whole number. Apts or Multi Family 6 trips/D.U. 10.1 trips/D.U. 1.0 Condos = 8 trips/D.U. All Commercial Office Regional Shopping 10.1 trips/D.U. 359.1 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 494 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 1.0 10 14 Community Shopping 800 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre Resolution No. 89-062 Page 11 22 Neighborhood Shopping Hotel, Motel, Parking Lot and Garage, Used Car Lot, Theater, Bowling Alley, Restaurant, Car Wash and Large Chain Grocery or Drug Stores. 1,200 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 33 These commercial establishments service communities; therefore they are the same as a community shopping center. 800 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 22 Service Station Service Stations functionally tend to serve neighborhoods, as a store like 7-11, etc; therefore, it is considered the same as a neighborhood shopping center. 1,200 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 22 8 Resolution No. 89-062 Page 12 Medical and Dental Offices and Animal Hospitals These commercial establishments are service oriented in the same manner as medical offices, therefore the land use is same as medical offices. the 905.2 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 25 Hospitals, Convalescent Hospitals and Rest Homes Mobile Home Parks 210.4 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 4.6 trips/D.U. 10.1 trips/D.U. 0.5 Auto Sales and Service 400 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 11 Factory--Light Manufacturing 40 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre Factory-Heavy Manufacturing, Extra-active, mining 120 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre Farmland, Rural Land, Agricultural preserve 2 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 0.1 Resolution No. 89-062 Page 13 Churches and Meeting Halls Churches and meeting halls generate about the same amount of traffic as public buildings, such as schools, etc. 60 trips/acre 2 36.4 trips/acre Cemetary, Mausoleum and Mortuary School, Library, Public Building, etc. Cemetries, mausoleums and mortuaries generate about the same number of trips as rural land, farmland, etc. 5 trips/acre 0.1 36.4 trips/acre 50 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 1.0 Golf Courses 8 trips/acre 36.4 trips/acre 0.2 General Recreation 38.4 trips/acre 26.4 trips/acre Vacant Land 10 Vacant land generates only a nominal number of trips as compared to single family residential, and therefore, vacant land receives little or no benefit from street lights. Vacant Land = Resolution No. Page 14 Vacant land generates only a nominal number of trips as compared to single family residential, and therefore, vacant land receives little or no benefit from street lights. Vacant land is assigned a 0.0 land use factor. Benefit factors for all land use categories, as derived above, are tabulated in Attachment C. 89-062 Calculation of Benefit Units Benefit factors are extended to benefit units for assessment by multiplying the benefit factor by the number of dwelling units per parcel or the acreage of the parcel as appropriate. This base calculation is applicable to all parcels that accrue both community benefits and service benefits, as previously defined. Approximately one-third of all parcels in the City of Poway do not, however, receive service benefits. An adjustment in base benefit units then must be made to reflect community benefits only. For this purpose, it is assumed that one-fourth of total benefits accrue as community benefits and three-fourths accrue as service benefits. Therefore, a community benefit of 0.25 is applied to the benefit factors for all developed parcels not directly serviced by street lighting. The adjusted benefit factors then are extended as noted above. Vacant parcels are not assessed. 11 Resolution No. 89-062 Page 15 Using current available data from the San Diego County Assessor, an estimate of aggregate benefit units by zone has been computed using the described method. These estimates are tabulated in Attachment D. Based upon the previous discussion, it is proposed in fiscal year 1989-1990, that the base benefit charge be $15.00. Thus, for community benefits, $3.75 will be charged and for service benefits, $11.25. In summary, those parcels in Zone A will be assessed at $15.00 per benefit unit and those parcels in Zone B will be assessed at $3.75 per benefit unit. Note that in the report for the Poway City Lighting District for fiscal year 1988-89, parcels and associated street light facilities in the Highland Ranch Subdivision, Map No. 12123, were included among those parcels in Zone A. By agreement with the City of Poway, street light facilities in that subdivision are now being operated and maintained as private facilities; therefore all parcels in the subdivision have been re-allocated to Zone B and the street lights are not included in the summary shown on page 2 of this report. 12 I ! \ // I I / Resolution No. 89-062 ? ? / CITY OF POWAY STRF. ET I.IGHTING DISTRICT ATI'ACHM~.NT A Resolution No. 89-062 Page 17 ATI'A~-NT B LAND USE CODES RESIDENTIAL 09 mobilehome 10 vacant residential 11 single family residence 12 duplex or double 13 multiple 2 to 4 units or 2 houses 14 multiple $ to 30 units 15 multiple 31 to 60 units 16 multiple 61 units and up 17 condominium 18 co-op 19 miscellaneous COMMERCIAL 20 vacant commercial 21 1 to 3 story misc. store bidgs. 22 4 story & up office & store bldgs. 23 regional shopping center 24 community shopping center 25 neighborhood shopping center 26 hotel, motel 27 service station 28 medical, dental, animal hospital 29 cony. hosp., rest home 30 office condominiums 31 parking lot, garage, used car lot 32 trailer park 33 theater 34 bowling alley 35 restaurant 36 car wash 37 grocery or drug - large chain 38 auto sales and service agency 39 misc., radio station, bank, etc. IRRIGATED FARM 50 vacant (water available) 51 citrus 52 avocados 53 vines 54 misc. 55 livestock 56 poultry 57 misc. irrigated crops 58 growing houses 59 special or misc. RURAL LAND (NON-IRRIGATED) 61 1-10 acres 62 11-40 acres 63 41-160 acres 64 161-360 acres 65 361 acres and up INSTITUTIONAL 70 vacant institutional 71 church 72 church parking or related 73 cemetery 74 mausoleum 75 mortuary 76 public bldg. (firehouse, school, library) 77 hospital · ')9 special or miscellaneous 14 Resolution No. 89-062 Page 18 40 vacant industrial 41 factory - light manu. 42 factory - heavy manu. 43 warehousing - processing or stg. 44 bulk storage (tanks, etc.) 45 extractive & mining 46 small automotive garages 47 industrial condominiums 49 special misc. 80 vacant recreational 81 meeting hall, gym 82 golf course 83 marina, docks 84 recreational camps 85 non-taxable (always 9-85) 86 open space easements 87 agricultural prsv. (not under contract) 88 agricultural prsv. (under contract) 89 special misc. 90 vacant taxable - govt. owned prop. 91 improved taxable - govt. owned prop. 15 Resolution No. 89-062 Page 19 ATrACHMENT C Benefit Factors by Land Usc B~nefit B~ncfit Factor Land Use Factor 0.5 09 0.0 10 1.0 11 1.0 12 1.0 13 1.0 14 1.0 15 1.0 16 1.0 17 1.0 18 1.0 19 0.1 20 10 21 10 22 14 23 22 24 33 25 22 26 33 27 25 28 06 29 30 22 31 0.3 32 22 33 22 34 22 35 22 36 22 37 11 39 0.0 40 1.0 41 3.0 42 2.0 43 2.0 44 3.0 45 1.0 46 47 2.0 49 trailer space 0.0 50 vacant residential 0.! 51 single family residential 0.1 52 duplex or double residential 0.1 53 residential 2-4 units 0.1 54 residential 5-30 units 0.1 55 residential 31-60 units 0.1 56 residential 6~1 units 0.1 57 condominium 0.1 58 co-op 0.1 59 misc. residential 0.1 61 vacant commercial 0.1 62 1-3 story office or store 0.1 63 4 story and up office or store 0.1 64 regional shopping center 0.1 65 community shopping center 0.0 70 neighborhood shopping center 0.0 71 hotel, motel 1.0 72 service station 0.1 73 medical, dental, animal hospital 0.1 74 cony. hospital, rest home 0.1 75 1.0 76 Prkg. lot, garage, used car lot trailer park theater bowling alley restaurant car wash large chain grocery or drug misc. commercial (radio station, bank) vacant industrial factory - light manufacturing factory - heavy manufacturing warehouse bulk storage mining small automotive garage misc. industrial 6.0 77 1.0 79 0.0 80 2.0 81 0.2 82 0.4 83 1.0 84 0.0 85 0.0 86 0.1 87 0.1 1.0 0.0 1.0 I.and Use 89 9O 91 vacant irrigated citrus avocados vines misc. trees livestock poultry misc. irrigated crops growing houses misc. irrigated fallll non-irr/g. 1-10 AC non-irrig. 11-40 AC non-irrig. 41-160 AC non-irrig. 161-360 AC non-irrig. 361 AC and up vacant institutional church church prkg. or related cemetery mausoleum mortuary public bldg. (firehouse, school, library) hospital misc. institutional vacant recreational meeting hall, gym golf course marina, docks recreational camps non-taxable recreational open space easements agric, preserve (not under contract) agric, preserve (under contract) misc. recreational taxable gov. prpty., vacant taxable gov. prpty., impro~ ~d 16 ZONE Zone A Zone B TOTAL ATrACHMI~.NT D BENEFIT 11,796 7,481 19,227 Resolution No. Page 20 F_STIMAT~.D PARCE~ .q 8,478 4~455 12,933 89-062 17