Res 92-122RESOLUTION NO. 92-122
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY,
CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT THE CONSTRUCTION
OF SOUTH POWAY SPORTS PARK TO BE OF BENEFIT TO THE
PAGUAY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Poway Redevelopment Agency has undertaken the
construction of South Poway Sports Park, an adult recreational
complex (5620); and
WHEREAS, the proposed project is within the Paguay
Redevelopment Project and pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan for
the project, which Redevelopment Plan was adopted on December 13,
1983 by ordinance No. 117 of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Section 33445 of the california Health and Safety
Code requires the Agency to determine the issue of benefit to the
Paguay Redevelopment Project prior to expenditure of funds and that
no other reasonable means of financing are available; and
WHEREAS, the construction of the park will provide increased
recreational opportunities for the adult residents of the
Redevelopment Project area and the community at large; and
WHEREAS, the construction of the park will free up needed
playing fields for use by youth sports teams and the community at
large.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Poway as follows:
The Council finds that construction of the South Poway
Sports Park is of benefit in that it provides increased
recreational opportunities for adult residents within the
Plan area as well as the community at large.
The Council determines that pursuant to Health and Safety
Code 33445, (1) the construction of the park is of
benefit to the Project area and neighborhood in which
such property is situated; and (2) no other reasonable
means of financing the project is available to the City
of Poway.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of t
California, this 23rd day of June, 1992.
Jan
Gold
ATTEST:
Wahlsten, City Clerk
~e City of Poway,
mith, Mayor
Resolution No. 92-122
Page 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
I, Marjorie K. Wahlsten, City Clerk of the City of Poway, do
hereby certify, under the penalty of perjury, that the foregoing
Resolution, No. 92-122 , was duly adopted by the City Council
at a meeting of said City Council held on the 23rd day of__
June , 1992, and that it was so adopted by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
EMERY, HIGGINSON, MCINTYRE, SNESKO
NONE
NONE
GOLDSMITH
BR5620.RE$
Marjor~e~. Wahlsten, City Clerk
City o~way