Loading...
POC - Traffic Signal Report 1994 TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPORT 1994 POWAY City of Poway - Department of Engineering Services CITY OF POWAY - TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPORT FOR 1994 CITY COUNCIL Don Higginson, Mayor - Susan Callery, Deputy Mayor Bob Emery, Councilmember _ Mickey Cafagna, Councilmember Betty Rexford, Councilmember James L. Bowersox, City Manager TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE John D, Fitch, Chair, Assistant City Manager Mark S. Weston, Director of Engineering Services Michael H. Robinson, Traffic Engineer Kent Whitson, Transportation Consultant Mark Sanchez, Director of Safety Services James R. Williams, Director of Public Services Deputy William Jehl, Sheriff's Department Sergeant Billie Bustamante, Sheriff's Department Tim Purvis, Director of Transportation, Poway Unified School District PREPARED BY CITY OF POWAY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION JAN 1 0 1995 TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPORT 1994 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION i INTERSECTION UST 1 SIGNAL PRIORITY UST 2 INTERSECTIONS NOT MEETING MAJOR WARRANTS 3 LOCATION MAP 4 UNSIGNAMZED INTERSECTIONS REVIEWED IN THIS REPORT: 5 Pomerado/Casa Avenida Pomerado/Robison Garden/Neddick Pomerado/OId Pomerado Midland/Aubrey Pomerado/McFeron Poway/Adah/Evanston Twin Peaks/Budwin Espola/Durhullen Espola/Cloudcroft Pomerado/Vaughan Pomerado/Holland SlGNAEZED INTERSECTION ACCIDENT DIAGRAMS 70 TRAFFIC SIGNAL RATING SYSTEM 115 CALTRANS SIGNAL WARRANTS 120 The Traffic Signal Report for the City of Poway evaluates non-signalized intersections for possible signalization. It also includes the accident history of all signalized intersections in Poway. This report is the first, and will be prepared annually by the Traffic Engineering Division of the Engineering Services Department. BACKGROUND In 1993, the Hughes Heiss Management and Efficiency Study identified the need for Poway to create an overall Traffic Signal Masterplan. This Traffic Signal Report is that tool for evaluating traffic safety at existing traffic signals, locating future traffic signals, _ and identifying future signal costs. Poway's busiest non-signalized intersections have bccn reviewed to help insure that .... the safest possible conditions are maintained. These reviews are initiated at citizen, City Council or Traffic Safety Committee requests. Information about the intersections in this year's report has been gathered and compared with criteria established by the - State of California to determine if a traffic signal will improve public safety. Staff has identified 12 unsignalized candidate locations for the 1994 Signal Report. These candidate intersections were reviewed by making traffic counts, site visits, analyzing ~- accident patterns, and completing traffic signal warrant sheets. Included in this report is a City map showing all existing signalized intersections and the 12 candidate locations. The report contains collision diagrams which aid in reviewing trends in the -- accident patterns at both unsignalized and signalized locations. A rating system for unsignalized intersections was adopted by the Traffic Safety Committee in June 1994 to rank the intersections in order of need. The intersections are listed in order of ' recommended priority in the attached Tables. Signal modifications will be reviewed in future issues of this report, along with requests for new traffic signal reviews. FINDINGS __ A traffic signal warrant sheet was prepared for each intersection based on warrants developed by the State of California as specified in the State Traffic Manual. The warrant sheets and a description of each warrant are included in the back of this report. Of the 11 warrants in the State Traffic Manual, this report evaluates warrant numbers 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 11. These warrants provide the best description of traffic conditions at unsignalized intersections. Warrant numbers 1, 2 and 8 are called the 'major warrants'. They measure traffic volumes on intersecting streets and are the best indicators for determining when a traffic signal will improve safety. Warrant 4, School Crossings, is considered in locations where school pedestrian volumes are a primary reason for considering a traffic signal. Warrants 6, 9, and 11 are minor warrants which help provide additional information about an intersection. Warrants 8, 9, and 11 acknowledge the fact that urban traffic volumes are increasing to the point of causing delays on minor street approaches to unsignalized intersections. Locations must meet at least one of the major warrants (1, 2, and/or 8) in order to be placed on the signal priority list. It should be noted that the satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion, or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment also must be shown. The intersections were prioritized utilizing a point system developed by the City of San Diego and adopted by the Federal Aid Urban (FAU) Regional subcommittee. This system was first used in 1979 and was updated in 1984. The rating system assigns points for new signals based on criteria including traffic volume, pedestrian volume (when applicable), accident history, and special conditions. Priority points assigned to each location allow for a comparison with the other locations reviewed, and they are not necessarily an indicator that a signal should be constructed. SUMMARY Research and preparation for this report has led to the conclusion that Poway has a lower than average accident rate throughout most of its intersections. Poway has a well-designed and well laid-out signal system that provides for the most efficient and safest possible progression of traffic. The intersection rated at the top of the recommended priority list has already been funded and design will begin in the spring of 1995. No other intersections which appear on the prior'~j list are recommended for funding or construction at this time. These locations will be reviewed again in the 1995 Traffic Signal Report for possible status changes. This report is intended to aid in determining the best use of available funds for traffic signals in the City's 1994-1995 fiscal year budget. INTERSECTION UST UNSIGNALI'ZI;D INTERSECTIONR Pomerado/Casa Avenida Poway/Adah/Evanston Pomerado/Robison Twin Peaks/Budwin Garden/Neddick Espola/Durhullen Pomerado/OId Pomerado Espola/Cloudcroft Midland/Aubrey Pomerado/Vaughan Pomerado/McFeron Pomerado/Holland SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION-~ 1. Community/Aubrey 23. Pomerado/Stowe 2. Community/Civic Center 24. Pomerado/Ted Williams 3. Community/Hilleary 25. Pomerado/Twin Peaks 4. Community/Metate 26. Poway/Carriage 5. Community/Olive Grove 27. Poway/Community 6. Community/Scripps Poway Pkwy. 28. Poway/Espola 7. Community/Stowe 29. Poway/Gardan 8. Espola/Del Poniente/High Valley 30. Poway/Iola 9. Espola/IAke Poway 31. Poway/Midland 10. Espola/Martincoit 32. Poway/Oak Knoll 11. Espola/Summerfield 33. Poway/Pomerado 12. Espola/T'rtan/Eden Grove 34. Poway/Silver Lake 13. Espola/Valle Verde 35. Poway/SR 67 14. Midland/Hilleary 36. Poway/Tarascan 15. Pomerado/9th Street 37. Scripps Poway Pkwy./Kirkham 16. Pomerado/Colony 38. Twin Peaks/Community 17. Pomerado/Glen Oak 39. Twin Peaks/Espola 18. Pomerado/Meadowbrook 40. Twin Peaks/Midland 19. Pomerado/Metate 41. Twin Peaks/Siiverset 20. Pomerado/Oak Knoll 42. Twin Peaks/Ted Williams/Deerwood 21. Pomerado/Pomerado Hospital 43. Twin Peaks/'l~erra Bonita 22. Pomerado/Scripps Poway Pkwy. INTERSECTIONS UNDER SIGNAL DESIGN Espola/OId Coach/Bridlewood ]- Deoember lg94 N CITY POWAY ~TE~:  TITLE: T'ff~F'F'je ~IC. NALS SCALE : NT5 ATTACHMENT: TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPORT 1994 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS REVIEWED Pomerado/Casa Avenida Poway/Adah/Evanston Pomerado/Robison Twin Peaks/Budwin Garden/Neddick Espola/Durhullen Pomerado/OId Pomerado Espola/Cloudcroft Midland/Aubrey Pomerado/Vaughan Pomerado/McFeron Pomerado/Holland ACCIDENT DIAGRAMS LEGEND © Non-injury accident ~ Vehicle backed up ® Injury accident ~ Left tum/through · Fatal accident Sideswipe VRW Violation of right-of-way ~ Right angle accident r INATF Inattention ~O · Rear end accident RRL Ran red light > [] Hit stationary object ESS Exceeded safe speed ~ Vehicle lost control DUI Driving under the influence CONST Construction UNK Unknown FTC Following too close RSS Ran stop sign HR Hit and run ILC Illegal lane change ULC Unsafe lane change DV Disabled vehicle SlG MAL Signal malfunction IT Improper/illegal turn 5 LOCATION: ~ON~41~(~ AD / ~A~.$,q A~IF~iIZ~z~ POINT TOTAL: ! TRAFFIC SIGNAL RATING SYSTEM WARRANT 1 - TOTAL VEHICULAR VQLLI~ APPROACH LANES TYPE OF TOTAL STREET BOTH APPROACHES 2-2 LANES MAJOR STREET 1-2 &1-4 LANES 2-4 LANES ~';ZE, /(~Z /80o z. oo~ (~7GI 2.-.ONE WAY LANES CONBINED MINOR STREET i LANE ASSIGNED POSSIBLE SEE FIGURE 3.13(A) FOR POINTS. ~2 15 WAI~:laCfF 2 - INi~TION 0F CONTINUOUS ll~IC APPROACH LANES 7:0o ~o0 17:0o 18:oo TOTAL BOTH APPROACHES MAJOR STREET ~,2,5 16~6~Z. ,1~0 ZO0~I ~376 BOTH APF~0ACHES MINCR STREET '70 98 Go 7 z ~ NOTE: TO ASSIGN POINTS THE COMBINED MINOR STREET TOTAL MUST BE E(~JAL TO OR 6~EATER THAN 300 VEHICLES ZN A GIVEN FOUR HOU~ PERIOD. ASSIGNED POSSIBLE SEE TABLE 3.13(B) FOR POINTS, /0 10 WAF~ 3 - PEDESTRIAN VOLUME (TYPICALLY USED FOR SCHOOL XING INTERSECTIONS) SEE TABLE 3.13(0) FOR POINTS. 0 10 WAF~IANT 6 - ACCXD~ HAZARD {USED ON ACOIDE~ SUSCEFrFIB) r TO OORRECTION BY A TRAFFIC SI(~4AL AND ONLY IF LESS RESTRICTIVE MEASURES - = O. 5 ~_ HAVE FAIt ~'n. ) NOTE: USE THE AVEP~JGE OF THE LAST llNO YEARS. SEE TABLE 3.13(D) FOR ~OINTS. 0 15 ~ 10 - SPEC~M.. CONDITIOI~: SCHOOLS, O~JRCHES, PUBLIC BUILDINGS, STEEP HILL, HORIZONTAL CUFNE, REb~iHICTED SIGHT DISTANCE, ETC. 15 POI~ GIVEN BY TRAFFIC F.~INEER'$ JUOGEHENT. TOTAL J~-'~ 65 DATE 9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS CALC ~H%~,~ c~Qs~b,,~ DATE DIST CO RTE PM CHK ,~,'H ~'- DATE ~ Major St: ~0 ~OO Critical Approach Speed .~0. ~ mph Minor St: C.),%A ~,4~:,,~3A Cdtical Approach Speed ,~.~.,,~ mph Critical speed of major street traffic _> 40 mph ............. [] orJ RURAL(R) in built up ama of isolated community of <: 10,000 pop .......... [] [] URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume 10(P/o SATISFIED YES [] NO 8o% SATISFIED YES [] NO APPROACH LANES 1 20rmors '7;00 ~'~:o.~ ~'~,~,'~, ///~:oc~.'c~o /~,,c:u~.o,,,H°'Jr MajorSb'eet (400) '(2~)_) (480)~ <~;'g /{~2~ i~C~ I'/?~ /~09 /~0 2cx3~ I~'Z Minor Street (120)~(8~ (160) (112) ~,~'. $'~ ~"~ ..~ ..~7 ,.~ bc~ ~'(z~ WARRANT 2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] 80% SATISFIED YES ]~ NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) LANES 1 2 or more 7.'~o //~;~ ~ ,'~o ;~ ;o;, ~ ',~ Hour MajorStreet (600) (42.0) (720)~ ~2~' I(~(~'Z 15~117~ 17o~ fe~O ,,,~.~oe 'V~Z. WARRANT3- Minimum Pedestrian Volume 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT FULFILLED Pedestrian volume crossing the major street is 100 or more for each of any four hours or is 190 or more during any one Yes [] No [] hour; AND There are less than 60 gaps per hour in the major street traf- fic stream of adequate length for pedestrians to cress; AND Yes [] No [] The nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 feet; AND Yes [] No [] The new traffic signal will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow on the major street. Yes [] No [] The satisfaction of a warrant Is not necassarlly Justification for a signal Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-7 Figure 9-2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 4 - School Crossings Not Applicable ........... [] See School Crossings Warrant Sheet ~, WARRANT5 - Progressive Movement SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL FULFILLED > 1000 FT. N fl, S ft, E ft. W ft.! YES [] NO [] ON ONE WAY ISOLATED STREETS OR STREETS WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE AND ADJACENT SIGNALS ARE SO FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING & SPEED CONTROL WOULD BE LOST ON 2-WAY STREETS WHERE ADJACENT SIGNALS DO NOT PROVIDE NECESSARY PLATOONING AND -- -- SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED SIGNALS COULD CONSTITUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM [] [] WARRANT 6- Accident Experience SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENTS WARRANT ~/ FULFILLED ONE WARRANT WARRANT 1 - MINIMUM VERtCULAR VOLUME SATISFIED ............................... OR 80% WARRANT 2-iNTERRUPTiON OF CONTINUOUS tRAFfiC YES ~ NO [] SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW [] [] ADEQUATE TR,AL OF LESS RESTR,CT. VE REMED,ES HAS FA.LED TO REOUCE ACC,DENT ~.~.~y MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS WARRANT 7 - Systems Warrant SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES ~/ FULFILLED DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VEH/HR 1000 VEl-i/HR ................................... ~ OR DURING EACH OF ANY 5 HRS. OF A SAT. AND/OR SUN. VEH/HR YES [] NO [] CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR ST, MINOR ST. HWY, SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NE]'~NORK FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF, ENTERING. OR TRAVERSING A CITY -ZR;~'s'~;',ZA7O~ ~&f'ET:,~ Z~oTFTc F, L .'-~ ..................... ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS MET, BOTH STREETS [] [] The satisfaction of a warrant Is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignmnent must be shown. 9 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 8- Combination of Warrants SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT WARRANT ./ FULFILLED TWO WARRANTS 1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED 80% 2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC t/ ~'YES [] NO [] WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO [~] ._ 2or /, / / Approach Lanes One more 7:o> Both Approaches Major Street ~"-/I ~ I I~ I ~O~ I¢~O Highest Approaches - Minor Street V"" II I I ,e I * Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Delay SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND YES [] NO [] 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND YES [] NO [] 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. YES [] NO [] WARRANT 11- Peak Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO [] 2 or Approach Lanes One more ~:,~/ / / Hour Both Approaches Major Street L~ /~,~ Highest Approaches - Minor Street v'/ * Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence '~f: the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. l0 9-10 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-5 SCHOOL PROTECTION WARRANTS CALC £ °ATE DIST CO RTE PM CHK DATE /L'J~,~/'4~O /~O~ Critical Approach Speed ~O. 5 mph Major St: - Minor St: ~4 ~V~/~ Critical Approach S~ed 2 ~ mph Critical speed of major street traffic ~ 40 mph .............. ~ ~ .. or~ RURAL(R) In bui~ up area of isolated community oi < 10,000 pop ........... ~ ~ URBAN (U) FLASHING YELLOW SCHOOL SIGNALS SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) Minimum Requirements PARTA U R / / Vehicle Volume Each of 2hours 200 140 School Age Pedestrian., Each of 40 40 SATISFIED YES [] NO [] Crossing Street 2 hours AND PART B CriticalApproach Speed Exceeds35 mph SATISFIED YES [] NO [] AND PART C Is nearest controlled crossing more than 600 feet away? SATISFIED YES [] NO [] SCHOOL AREA TRAFFIC SIGNALS SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) Minimum Requirements PART A U Vehicle Volume Each of 2ho~s 500 ~r~ ~- Each of School Age Pedestrian 2 hours 100 ~l 2.. ~ SATISFIED YES [] NO [] Crossing Street - - -or- ........... per day 500 350 AND PART B Is nearest controlled crossing morethan 600 feet away? SATISFIED YES .~ NO [] ~ ¢~i$A AV£NIDA CITY OF POWAY ~: ~,~-~,~s ~ SCALE : ~?~ ATTACHMENT: LOCATION: '--~,~£rZ4o~'-'~O /"~O$,~N~"~t...~/O. POINT TOTAL: TRAFFIC SIGNAL RATING SYSTEM WA~ANT I - TOTAL VEiICUI.~R ~ APPROACH LANES TYPE OF TOTAL STREET ~):oo I$:ou /G:oo 10:~o BOTH APPROACHES MAJOR STREET 2-ONE WAY LANES COMBINED MINCR STREET ASSIGNED ~IBLE SEE FIGURE 3.13(A) FOR POINTS. I~ 15 WARRN~F 2 - INm~-m~JPTION OF O0~TINUOUS TRAFFIC APPROACH LANES I~.'oo /G:o~ 17;o0 18:oo TOTAL BOTH APPROACHES /~39 /5o/ Y53~ ]7~ (~G$ MAJOR STREET BOTH APPROACHES MINOR STREET /6'7 /~ 7~9 /6~ 6GZ. NOTE: TO ASSIGN POINTS THE CONBINED MINOR STREET TOTAL NUST BE EQUAL TO OR G~EATER THAN 300 VEHICLES IN A GIVEN FOUR HOUR PERIOD. ASSIGNED POSSIBLE SEE TABLE 3.13(B) FOR POINTS. /O 10 WA~ 3 - PEDESTRIAN VOLUME (TYPICALLY USED FOR SCHOOL XIN~ INTERSECTIONS) SEE TABLE 3.13(C) FOR POINTS. N-/{ 10 CHURCHES, PUBLIC BUILDINGS, STEEP HILL, HORIZONTAL CLRVE, RESTRICTED SIGHT DISTANCE, ETC. 15 POINTS GIVEN BY TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S JUDGENENT. TOTAL 2.~ 65 BY~ 9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS · CALC~ DATE _ DIST CO RTE PM CHK /'E4/~ DATE ~ Major St: -~',~..~ ~r~ C~i~l ~roach S~ed ~ mph Minor ~: ~:;=~ CrRical ~proach S~ed ~ mph -" Cdti~l s~ed of major strut tmff~ ~ ~ ~h ............. ~ ~ or~ RURAL (R) In buiM up ~ea of isolat~ communi~ of ~ 10,000 ~p .......... .- ~ URBAN (U) WARRA~ 1 - Minimum Vehl~lar Volume 1~ SATISFIED YES MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ~% SATISFIED YES u u - APPROACH H~h~t~r~. 1~ K10~ ~ 140 ~rS=~t (~) ~(~J (~) ¢~2) /e~ /~ 1~ I~ /~ /~ IbB /~ WARRANT 2- Interruption of ~ntinuous Traffic 10~ SATISFIED YES ~% SATISFIED YES MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS s.ow... u u - ~NES ~ A~r~s. 750 525 ~0 - ~rS~t (~) ~ (~) (~) /24 /2~ I1~ I~? I~ 13~ 1~9 I~ '- WARRANT 3 - Minimum Pede~rian Volume 10~/~ SATISFIED YES REQUIREMENT FULFILLED Pedestrien volume crossing the major street is 100 or mom for each of any four houm or is 190 or more dudng any one Yes ~ No hour; AND ~ere am less than 60 g~s ~r hour in the major street traf- f~ stream of ad~uate ~n~h for ~destHans to cross; AND Yes ~ No ~e nearest traff~ s~nal along the major street ~ greater than 300feet;AND Yes ~ No The new traffic s~nal will not seriously disrupt pr~re~ive traffic flow on the ~jor street. Yes ~ No The ~tlsfa~lon efa wa~ant Is not ~arlly Justlfl~tlen for a slg~L Delay, conge~lon, confusion or other evlden~ ef the n~ tor Hght~f-~y a~lgnme~ mu~ ~ shown. 15 Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-7 Figure 9~2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 4 - School Crossings Not Applicable .......... See School Crossings Warrant Sheet WARRANT 5 - Progressive Movement SATISFIED YES [] NO ~ 1000 FT. N ft, S ft, E ft, W ft. YES [] NO [] ON ONE WAY ISOLATED STREETS OR STREETS WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE AND ADJACENT WARRANT 6- Accident Experience SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENTS WARRANT ~/ FULFILLED ONE WARRANT WARRANT 1 - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME ~ SATISFIED OR 80% WARRANT 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC ~ YES [] NO [] SIGNAL W~LL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW [] [] ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY [] [] ACC. WITHIN A 12 MONTH PERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR. & INVOLVING INJURY OR ~- $500 DAMAGE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS ~) 5 OR MORE [] [] WARRANT 7 - Systems Warrant SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM VOLUME REOUIREMENT ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES ~/ FULFILLED DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VEH/HR 1000 VEH/HR ................................... OR DURING EACH OF ANY 5 HRS. OF A SAT. AND~R SUN.. VEH/HR YES [] NO [] CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR ST. MINOR ST. HWY. SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF, ENTERING, OR TRAVERSING A CITY APPEARS AS MAJOR ROUTE ON AN OFFICIAL PLAN ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS MET, BOTH STREETS [] [] The satisfaction of a warrant Is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way asslgnmnent must be shown. TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 8- Combination of Warrants SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT WARRANT ~/ FULFILLED TWO WARRANTS 1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME i~/ ~ SATISFIED 80% 2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC ~,,'~ YES ,~ NO [] WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES ,~ NO [] Approach Lanes One more c,- ~,~,> ..~,~ a~ Hour Both Approaches Major Street Highest Approaches - Minor Street ~ I ~ /~,'7 / ~ /~'i~ * Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Delay SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND YES [] NO [] 2. The volu?e on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one mowng lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND YES [] NO [] 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. YES [] NO [] WARRANT 11 - Peak Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO [] 2or ~ ~ ~ Approach Lanes One more /4,,'~ ~ /' /' Hour Both Approaches Major Street ~ /..~ o I Highest Approaches - Minor Street ~ /~,~ * Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) fo determine if lhis warrant is satisfied. The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence ,f the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. 17 N ~ I~OBI$ON ~ VRW/ Il-e-cz CITY OF POWAY ,TEM: TITLE: ~,r~ I~LV~ ~ SCALE: NT~ ATTACHMENT: TRAFFIC SIGNAL RATING SYSTEM V/A[~ I - TOTAL VEHICULAR VOLIJNE APPROACH LANES TYPE OF STREET ::~.'C~ ,./¢..~::) /2~:~0 /~','(DO TOTAL BOTH APPROACHES 2-2 LANES MAJOR STREET 1-2 &1-4 LANES - 2-ONE WAY LANES COMBINED MINOR STREET ~ LANES ,~3 383 ¢5.~ ,~G /¢:F~71 ASSIGNED POSSIBLE SEE FIGURE 3.13(A) FOR POINTS. /~ 15 w~ 2 - Ihmb~ION OF OONTIMJOU~ TRAFFIC APPROACH LANES ~'OO /-~,'C¢::) /8:00 ./~.'OO TOTAL BOTH APPROACHES BOTH APPROACHES NOTE: TO ASSIGN POINTS THE COMBINED MINOR STREET TOTAL MUST BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 300 VEHICLES TN A GIVEN FOUR HOUR PERIOD. ASSIGNED POSSIBLE SEE TABLE 3.13(B) FOR POINTS. c~ 10 WARRANT 3 - PEDESTRIAN VOLUNE (TYPICALLY USED FOR SCHCOL XING INTERSECTIONS) SEE TABLE 3.13(C) FCR POINTS. (~ 10 19 ~ $ -- ACCII~ HAZA~ (USED ON ACCIDENTS SU~CEPTIBm~ TO COF~ECTION BY A ~Acc~pe4z~ 'PRAFFI¢ $I~AL ~ ONLY IF LESS RESTRICTIVE MEASURES Z'~e~s -' O HAVE FAil FI3. ) NOTE: U~E THE AVERAGE OF THE I_AST T~O YEARS. SEE TABLE 3.13(D) FCR F:OINTS. O 15 Q-&JRCHES, PUBLIC BUILDINGS, STEEP HILL, HCRIZONTAL CURVE, RESTRICTED SIGHT DISTANCE, ETC. -" ~S: N-A. POINTS GIVEN BY TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S JUDC~NENT. TOTAL 2~ 65 DATE ~- Z~- ~.~/ sY~ 9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS CALC 0E.k~$c ~r~H DATE DIST CO RTE PM CHK ./~,P-, DATE Major ~: ~ ~ Cdti~l ~proach S~ed ~ mph Minor ~: N ~/~ ~V~. C~i~l ~roach S~ed ~,~ mph Cdt~l s~ed of major street tmflb > 40 ~h ....... ~ ~ -- - ..... or RU~L (R) J In bulE up area of isolat~ ~mmun~ of < 10,000 ~p .......... ~ URBAN (U) WARRA~ 1 - Minimum Vehi~lar Volume 10~ SATISFIED YES MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ~ SHOWN IN BRACK~S) APPROACH 1 2ormom 7.~ -- ,,~:~,'~.-. ,.- .. ,. -- ~NES ~ ~ ~r~s. [~ ~ ~ 4~ ~jorS~t~ ~t~ (~) (~) (~6) ~ ~/ G~ ~ ~ /~ II~ ~3~ /~ WARRANT 2 - Interruption of ~nlinuous Traffic 10~ SATISFIED YES ~/~ =A~ ~=~cu ~c~ MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS APPROACH~NES~1 2ormom 7.~ ~.'m ~.'~o//Sm//~:~/l~//9:m//~:~ ~thA~r~s. [7~% 525 ~0 MinorS~t~(~ (42) (~) (~) /~[ /7~ J~/ J~ /~ Je~ Zo~ ~0/ /eo~° WARRANT 3 - Minimum Pedestrian Volume 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT FULFILLED Pedestrian volume crossing the major street is 100 or moro for each of any four hours or is 190 or more during any one Yes [] No [] hour; AND There are less than 60 gaps per hour in the major street traf- fic stream of adequate length for pedestrians to cross; AND Yes [] No [] The nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 feet; AND Yes [] No [] The new traffic signal will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow on the major street. Yes [] No [] The satisfaction of a warrant Is net necessarily Jusflficetlon for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-7 Figure 9-2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 4 - School Crossings Not Applicable .......... See School Crossings Warrant Sheet WARRANT 5 - Progressive Movement SATISFIED YES [] NO MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL FULFILLED > 1000FT. N It, S ft, E __it, W ft. YES[] NO[] ON ONE WAY ISOLATED STREETS OR STREETS WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE AND ADJACENT SIGNALS ARE SO FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING & SPEED CONTROL WOULD BE LOST ON 2-WAY STREETS WHERE ADJACENT SIGNALS DO NOT PROVIDE NECESSARY PLATOONING AND SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED SIGNALS COULD CONSTITUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM [] [] WARRANT 6- Accident Experience SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENTS WARRANT ~/ FULFILLED ONE WARRANT WARRANT 1 - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME v/' ~ SATISFIED OR ,- 80% WARRANT 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC ~ YES ~. NO [] SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW ~ [] ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY [] [] ACC. WITHIN A 12 MONTH PERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR. & INVOLVING INJURY OR --> $500 DAMAGE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS oR MORE [] [] WARRANT 7 - Systems Warrant SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES ~ FULFILLED DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VEH/HR 1000 VEH/HR ................................... OR DURING EACH OF ANY 5 HRS. OF A SAT. AND/OR SUN. VEH/HR YES [~] NO [] CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR ST. MINOR ST. HWY. SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF, ENTERING, OR TRAVERSING A CITY APPEARS AS MAJOR ROUTE ON AN OFFICIAL PLAN ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS MET. BOTH STREETS [] [] -- The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignmnent must be shown. ~-8 ~' TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS _ WARRANT 8- Combination of Warrants SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT WARRANT ,,/ FULFILLED -- TWO WARRANTS 1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED 80% 2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC ~" YES [] NO [] WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO 'J~ -- HighestApproaches - MinorStreet I,,," j /~/ J/'77 * Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Delay SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND -- YES [] NO [] 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND YES [] NO [] 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. YES [] NO [] WARRANT 11 - Peak Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO ~. 2 or Approach Lanes One.. more 7.'~ / / / Hour Both Approaches Major Street ~ '7~'~ Highest Approaches - Minor Street J,/' / ~/ * Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. The satisfaction of a warrant is not necesaadly justification for a signal. Delay congestion confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. 23 ~ 0~40 CITY OF POWAY ~:  TITLE : SCALE : ~ ATTACHMENT 24 TRAFFIC SIGNAL RATING SYSTEM APPROACH LANES TYPE OF TOTAL STREET I~:oo ii~.'oo /t:oo .20:o0 BOTH APPROACHES 2-2 LANES MAJCR STREET 1-2 &1-4 LANES 2-ONE WAY LANES CONBINED MINOR STREET ~, LANES /~;~ /~ /~, /~ ~0 ASSIGNED POSSIBLE SEE FIGURE 3.13(A) FOR POTNTS. /~) 15 w$~N'r 2 - INi~-~-~ION O~ CONTINU~ ~IC ~A~ ~ES f.~ /~.'OD /~,'oO /~,'~ TOTAL ~ ~ACHES ~ AP~ACHES ~TE: TO A~I~ ~S ~E ~B~N~ MI~ S~E~ TOTAL ~T BE ~L TO ~ ~T~ ~ 300 V~IC~S IN A GIVEN F~R ~ P~I~, A~I~ED ~IBLE SEE T~LE 3.13(B) F~ ~I~S. ~ 10 W~ 3 - ~I~ ~ {~PICALLY ~ED F~ ~L XI~ I~SE~I~} SEE TABLE 3.13(C) F~ ~I~S. ~ 10 25 ~ O - /~IDENT HAZ~ (USED ON ACCIDENTS SUSCEPTIBLE TO CORRECTION BY A TRAFFIO SIGNAL AND ONLY IF LESS RESTRICTIVE MEASURES HAVE FAILED. ) NOTE: USE THE AVERAGE OF THE LAST TWO YEARS. SEE TABLE 3.13(D) FCR POINTS. O 15 _. WAI~iANT 10 - SPECIAL CONDITIONS: SCHOOLS, ChinCHES, PUBLIC BUILDINGS, STEEP HILL, HC~IZONTAL CURVE, RESTR[CTED SIGHT DISTANCE, ETC. ~ 15 PO'rNTS GZVEN BY TRAFF'~C ENGZNEER'$ JUEGENFJ~r, TOTAL 65 BY - i -- ' o 26 9.6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-1 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS · CALC .~ ~-~h£~ ~ ~ ~! DATE -- DIST CO RTE PM CHK //? t-~?..- DATE Major St: , ~ C ~ e_ i'~:~ I [-- F. Critical Approach Speed ,~ ,2.5 mph MinorSt: F''._© ~ ~;'l'~t ' ~ ' CriticalApproachSpeed '~/' -~ mph · - Critical speed of major street traffic _> 40 mph ............. [] } or RURAL (R) In built up area of isolated community of < 10,000 pep .......... [] .... [] URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 80% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) -- APPROACH LANES 1 2ormore '~.'~o /~'~/~.cc//G.oc//~,oo////~.=a////~..o,~//~: Hour MajorSImet (400) (280) (480) ~(336)~(o(0~ ,~,.~ I(~.~j ,f~ ~ IC~ ~o~, ~)~.~ ~ ~ Highest Apprch. 150 105 200 140 ~norS~ee~ 02O) (S4) 0~0) (~t2) g~ ~/"/ (~?.- {'~ '7] 7.5 -71 'il = WARRANT 2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES [~ NO [] .__ M~N~MUM REOU~R£MENTS 80% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] APP.OAOH U U ~rS~'eet (600) (420) ,(720) L( ) ~,~'l ~3~/ '77'~ ~,60 ~2.9 R2~) t~.3~'/0,~ High~l Apprch. 75 53 M~r S~'~t (60) ; (42)) 100 70 (~o) (~)~ ~4 57 .54~,Zt~ ?.~'71 WARRANT 3 - Minimum Pedestrian Volume 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT FULFIl I Fr3 Pedestrian volume crossing the major street is 100 or more for each of any four hours or is 190 or more during any one hour; AND Yes [] No [] There are less than 60 gaps per hour in the major street traf- fic stream of adequate length for pedestrians to cress; AND Yes [] No [] The nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 feet; AND Yes [] No [] The new traffic signal will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow on the major street. Yes [] No [] The ~atlafactlon of a warrant la not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment must be ahown. Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-7 't-lgg2 Figure 9-2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 4 - School Crossings Not Applicable .......... .~ See School Crossings Warrant Sheet [] WARRANT 5 - Progressive Movement SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL FULFILLED > 1000FT. N fl, S ft, E ft, W ft.i YES[] NO[] ON ONE WAY ISOLATED STREETS OR STREETS WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE AND ADJACENT SIGNALS ARE SO FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING & SPEED CONTROL WOULD BE LOST ON 2-WAY STREETS WHERE ADJACENT SIGNALS DO NOT PROVIDE NECESSARY PLATOONING AND SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED SIGNALS COULD CONSTITUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM [] [] WARRANT 6- Accident Experience SATISFIED YES [] NO REQUIREMENTS WARRANT ~/ FULFILLED ONE WARRANT WARRANT 1 - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED 80% WARRANT 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC ~// YES ~ NO [] SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW [~ [] ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY [] [] ACC. WITHIN A 12 MONTH PERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR. & INVOLVING INJURY OR :> $500 DAMAGE MORE 0 [] IZ WARRANT 7 - Systems Warrant SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES ~/ FULFILLED DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VEH/HR 1000 VEH/HR OR DURING EACH OF ANY 5 HRS. OF A SAT. AND/OR SUN. VEH/HR YES [] NO [] CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR ST. MINOR ST. HWY. SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF, ENTERING, OR TRAVERSING A CITY AP;EA 'S .--ATO '.--OTFTC .................... ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS MET, BOTH STREETS [] [] The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a sl,~na~..~. -,xne~a", congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way asslgnmnent must be shown. 28 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 8- Combination of Warrants SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT WARRANT ,,/ FULFILLED TWO WARRANTS 1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED 80% 2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC ~ YES [] NO [] WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES J~ NO [] 2or Approach Lanes One more ~;oo ~/u;o~ XT.'o~/"/~:~ Hour Both Approaches Major Street V'""" c~,,~? ~2._¢/ c/~ct li~(~ Highest Approaches - Minor Street ~ ~"~ (.¢,~ 73 75 * Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Delay SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND YES [] NO [] 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of tralfic or 150 vph tor two moving lanes; AND YES [] NO [] 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. YES [] NO [] WARRANT 11 - Peak Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO [] 2 or / / / Approach Lanes One more ~';~/~/~,'~,/' ,// Hour Highest Approaches - MinorSlreet /'"'"'/II17~ I * Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence · ~f the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. 29 CITY OF POWAY ~TEM: ,~,.~- ~,~,~  TITLE: ~/~ ~~ ~n SCALE : ~ ATTACHMENT : ~o LOCATZO : RO / .%- Point TOTAL: 2/ / - TRAFFIC SIGNAl. RATING SYSTEM NAI~ 1 - TOTAL VEHICULAR VO~ APPi~OACH LANES TYPE OF TOTAL STREET ,1c(.'oo 1(~:oo 17:oo I$:ao BOTH APPROACHES ~ MAJOR STREET 1-2 &1-4 LANES 2-4 LANES 50~ (m(~O 72? ~8'~ m;~..q..~_~ 2-ONE WAY LANES CCNBINED MINOR STREET I LANE~ ?~ <~5 /2~ Id/ z,~L ASSIGNED POSSIBLE SEE FIGURE 3.13(A) FOR POINTS. (~ 15 WAFRANT 2 - Ih'leJt~t~rIoN OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC APPROACH LANES 15:oo /(~.'oo /7.'oo /~3:oo TOTAL BOTH APPROACHES MAJOR STREET 555 ~,~,0 7~ ~q ZGZ~ BOTH APPROACHES MINOR STREET -7'7 q? /2~, /'ti ~t-t3 NOTE: TO ASSIGN POINTS THE CONB[NED NINOR STREET TOTAL NUST BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 300 VEHICLES TN A GIVEN FOUR HOUR PERIOD. ASSIGNED POSSIBLE SEE TABLE 3.13(B) FOR POINTS. ~ 10 WAI~ANT 3 - PEDF-~'I~IAN VOLUME (TYPICALLY USED FOR SCHOOL XING INTERSECTIONS) SEE TABLE 3.13(C) FOR POINTS. N~A 10 -- ~ 6 - AC~ID~ HAZ~ (USED ON ACCIDENTS SUSCEPTIBLE TO COI~RECTION BY A Z TRAFFIC SI(~NAL AND ONLY IF LESS RESTRICTIVE MEASURES 7_ '~-S ¢~" HAVE FAILED. ) NOTE: USE THE AVERAGE OF THE LAST TWO YEARS. -- SEE TABLE 3.13(D) FOR POINTS. C) 15 _ W~RRN~r 10 - SPECIAL CONDITIONS: SCHOOLS, CHURCHES, PUBLIC BUILDINGS, STEEP HILL, HOEIZONTAL OJRVE, RESTRICTED SIGHT DISTANCE, ETC. - CONNENTS: "~u~c,c ?~rze_. ~o~7'~ 7'0 POINTS GIVEN BY TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S JUDGENENT, TOTAL 2f 65 32 9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ' CALC ~ DATE ~-/2-~ Major St: ).~ t 134. ~r4.~ ~[3 Cdtical Approach Speed ~-0 mph Minor St: ,~,u P,e~ <~T Critical Approach Speed .~=, mph Cdtical speed of major street traffic >_ 40 mph ............. ~ '~ orJ RURAL(R) In built up area of Isolated community of < 10,000 pep .......... [] [] URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume 10(P,~ SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 80% SATISFIED YES .~ NO [] (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) ul/ MIR Both A~,~,~, 500 /-3~% 600 420 ' ' MajorSlmet (400) ,(~ (480) (336) -'~20 '~/3'~/ ~/$8 ~5~g G~O '7~.9 ~,R"{ Highest Apprch 150 200 140 Minor Street (120) ~.(84)~ (160) (112) (~(o ~ 7~- '77 c~ 13(0 1'41 c~ ~Z?,, ~% ~'/?o 73?° Cl49~ Ioo~,~ /~,7,, WARRANT 2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 80% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (80% SHO~N IN BRACKETS} u u I",oo o Bol:h App~,s. 750 £525~) 900 630 MajorS~eet (500) ,HggY (720) (504) 5'29 500 4Ug 5.55 fo(o0 7.~9 bE,~'/ 507- Highest Apprch f~53 MJnorStreet (~(~) , (423~/~100 70 _ (so) (s6) 50 ~,W 72. -77 ~-c/ /.~ /4/ c1~9, I=07, I0~7= Ioo% 1=o'7o /oo'/, /oc~7o looT. WARRANT 3- Minimum Pedestrian Volume 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT FULFILLED Pedestrian volume crossing the major street is 100 or more for each of any four hours or is 190 or mom during any one Yes [] No [] hour; AND There are less than 60 gaps per hour in the major street traf- fic stream of adequate length for pedestrians to cross; AND Yes [] No [] The nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 feet;AND Yes [] No [] The new traffic signal will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow on the major street. Yes [] No [] The satisfaction of a warrant Is not necessarily Justlficotlon for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right, of-way assignment must be shown. Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-7 Figure 9-2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 4 - School Crossings Not Applicable .......... ,~ See School Crossings Warrant Sheet [] WARRANT5 - Progressive Movement SATISFIED YES [] NO I--~ MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL FULFILLED :> 1000FT. N it, S fi, E it, W ft. YES~] NO[--] ON ONE WAY ISOLATED STREETS OR STREETS WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE AND ADJACENT SIGNALS ARE SO FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING & SPEED CONTROL WOULD BE LOST ON 2-WAY STREETS WHERE ADJACENT SIGNALS DO NOT PROVIDE NECESSARY PLATOONING A-ND SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED SIGNALS COULD CONSTITUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM [] [] WARRANT 6 - Accident Experience SATISFIED YES [] NO REQUIREMENTS WARRANT ,/ FULFILLED ONE WARRANT WARRANT 1 - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME V SATISFIED .............................. OR 80% WARRANT 2-INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC ! j'/ YES [] NO [] S,GNAL W,LL NOTSERIOUSLY DISRUUPT PROGRESS,VE TR^FF,C FLOW ~ [] ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY -A~.~l~l~ ~1~ ~NTH PERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR. & INVOLVING INJURY OR ~ ~ DAMAGE ~,.,~.. ~.,~;--~ ......... ~ ................ R OF ACCIDENTS WARRANT 7- Systems Warrant SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES ,/ FULFILLED DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VEH/HR 1000 VEH/HR ................................... OR DURING EACH OF ANY 5 HRS. OF A SAT. AND/OR SUN. VEH/HR YES [] NO [] CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR ST. MINOR ST. HWY. SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC ' ~;£L;~£;~;~'^~ ~w-Y ;~-T;.~-E%;. ~£R ~. ;.; ~'~;;'V~.;,~-*-C~- ...... ' ...... APP~RS AS M~-OR RO~TE~ AN-OFF~'C~AL P[A'~ ............ ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS MET. BOTH STREETS [] [] The satisfaction of a warrant Is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way asslgnmnent must be shown. TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS _ WARRANT 8- Combination of Warrants SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT WARRANT ./ FULFILLED · - TWO WARRANTS 1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME ~ SATISFIED 80% 2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC ~ YES [] NO [] WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [~] NO [] Both Approaches Major Street -- Highest Approaches - Minor StreetII I II 1,4, I · Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAl AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Delay SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) 1. The total delay experienced for Iraflic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND YES [] NO [] 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AN[;) YES [] NO [] 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. YES [] NO [] WARRANT 11 - Peak Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO [] 2or j j /. Approach Lanes . One more 17,',~o ,//¢:~// ,,/ Hour Both Approaches Major Street ~ ~.~ ~,~ Highest Approaches - Minor Street ~ 1,~...(~ /,~/ * Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to delermine if this warrant is satisfied. The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way sssignraent must be shown. CITY OF POWAY ITEM: ~gCC/~/y' TITLE: ~'~Y SCALE: ~W~ ATTACHMENT / LOCATION: i ~'~~)~'~ll::~'~ ~[~ / ~"F~1~ ~ POINT TOTAL: TRAFFIC SIGNAl. RATING SYSTEM WARRANT 1 - TOTAL VEHICUI.~ VO~ APPROACH LANES TYPE OF TOTAL BOTH APPROACHES 2-2 LANES HAJOR STREET -~ &1-4 LANE~ ~'O /'g47, 1Tee, 13~s' 51tO 2-4 LANES 2-ONE WAY LANES CONBINED MINOR STREET I _ LANE~ /ZO ZO~ /C~ 9 7 5Z~) ASSIGNED POSSIBLE SEE FIGURE 3.13(A) FCR POINTS. I[ 15 WN~RANT 2 - INm~UPTION OF CONTINLK3tJS TRAFFIC APPROACH LANES -7:~ 8:oo /$~oo Iq:o, TOTAL BOTH APPROACHES MAJOR STREET ~0 IZ47 171~(~ 13~5" ~110 BOTH APPROACHES MINOR STREET /gO ~ / o'~ q'7 ,~'lc) NOTE: TO ASSIGN POINTS THE COMBINED MINOR STREET TOTAL MUST BE E~AL TO OR (~EATER THAN 300 VEHICLES IN A QIVEN FOUR HOUR PERIOD. ASSIGNED POSSIBLE SEE TABLE 3.13(B) FOR POINTS. /O 10 W~/~ 3 - PEDESTRIAN VOLUME (TYPICALLY USED FOR SCHOOL XING INTERSECTIONS) SEE TABLE 3.13(C) FOR POINTS. (~ 10 37 (USED ON ACCIDENTS SUSCEPTIBLE TO COF~ECTION BY A = 2.0 Am/,./ TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND ONLY IF LESS RES'II:{ICTIVE MEA,~ES HAVE FAILED. ) NOTE: USE THE AVERAGE OF THE LAST TWO YEARS. SEE TABLE 3.13(D) FOR POINTS. 0 15 WA~ 10 - SPECIAL CONDITIONS: SCHOOLS, CHURCHES, PUBLIC BUILDINGS, STEEP HILL, HORIZONTAL CUSVE, RESTRICTED SIGHT DISTANCE, ETC. CO 4ENTS: POINTS GIVEN BY TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S JUDGENENT. TOTAL ~ I 65 9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-1 -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS CALC C)~-~- %~,.~ DATE DIST CO RTE PM CHK /~/-/.~- DATE Major St: {gOI-L~.~4~o ~.C) Critical Approach Speed ~ mph Minor St: ¥~ F~.~ ~:~ Critical Approach Speed 7.~ mph - Critical speed of major street traffic > 40 mph ......... [] '~ -- ---- or RURAL(R) J in built up area of isolated com4"nunity of ~ 10,000 pop .......... [] [] URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] ,~,,,, ~;ATISFIED YES [] NO [] SHOWN i. Both Apprc~s. 500 350 600 ~'4~ MajorSlreet (400) (280) (480)[~(~33~/ ~0 I~.~] IOl3 ~.~cj /5ol /5,.~ 178~, ~orStreet (120)~ (180) (1~2) IIZ 'ZoZ el '7~. 7~ ?5 ~IZ. WARRANT 2- Interruption or' Continuous Traffic 1009. SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS APPROACH ~ - LANES . . MajorStreet (600) (420) (720),~...~., /2~1 /~.2~ /~l~l, ~¢$9 /$o/ /53? /7,;~. Highest Apprch. 75 ~ 100 70 ~r~rStreet (S0)[,(42J) (S0) (5~) 156 7/ E/~ 7Z '7? 75 ?Z WARRANT 3 - Minimum Pedestrian Volume 10l~',4, SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT FULFILLED Pedestrian volume crossing the major street is 100 or more for each of any four hours or is 190 or more dudng any one Yes [] No [] hour; AND There are less than 60 gaps per hour in the major street traf- fic stream of adequate length for pedestrians to cross; AND Yes [] No [] The nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 feet; AND Yes [] No [] The new traffic signal will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow on the major street. Yes [] No [] The satisfaction of a warrant Is not necessarily Justlflcetlon for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for rlght..of-way assignment must be shown. Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-7 Figure 9-2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 4 - School Crossings Not Applicable .......... [] See School Crossings Warrant Sheet [] WARRANT 5 - Progressive Movement SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL FULFILLED :> 1000 FT. N fl, S ft, E ft, W ft. YES [] NO [] ON ONE WAY ISOLATED STREETS OR STREETS WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE AND ADJACENT SIGNALS ARE SO FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING & SPEED CONTROL WOULD BE LOST SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED SIGNALS COULD CONSTITUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM [] [] WARRANT 6- Accident Experience SATISFIED YES [] NO REQUIREMENTS WARRANT ~ i FULFILLED ONE WARRANT WARRANT 1 - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED ................................ OR 80% WARRANT 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC YES [] NO [] SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW [] [] ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY [] [~ ACC. WITHIN A 12 MONTH PERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR. & INVOLVING INJURY OR ~ $500 DAMAGE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS 5 OR MORE [] ~ WARRANT 7 - Systems Warrant SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES ~ FULFILLED DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VEH/HR 1000 VEH/HR ................................... OR DURING EACH OF ANY 5 HRS· OF A SAT. AND/OR SUN. VEH/HR YES [] NO [] CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR ST. MINOR ST. HWY. SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTS DE OF, ENTERING, OR TRAVERSING A CITY APPEARS AS MAJOR ROUTE ON AN OFFICIAL PLAN ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS MET. BOTH STREETS [] [] The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way asslgnmnent must be shown. 9-8 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 8- Combination of Warrants SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT WARRANT ; ,/ FULFILLED TWO WARRANTS 1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME ,x/ SATISFIED 80% 2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC v/ YES [] NO [] WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO [] 2 or / / Approach Lanes One more 7.-~ /' 8 ~ //~1',~,, .//9 ~',~ Hour Both Approaches Major Street ~ ~¢0 I/2.~ Highest Approaches - Minor Street f //Z--I Z,o,Z. c/Z. I ~ I * Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Delay SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND YES [] NO [] 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND YES [] NO [] 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. YES [] NO [] WARRANT 11 - Peak Hour Volume SATISFIED YES J~_ NO [] 2 or , / / Approach Lanes One more f6,eo // // ,/ Hour Highest Approaches - Minor Street ~ ZO'Z. * Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence ,~ the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. 0 CITY OF POWAY ~TE,,,: ,~,~,,,~'  TITLE: SCALE: ~T~ ATTACHMENT LOCATIC~4: ?OU.)AH '--~0 I ~DAH I ~^~qI~9'o~ POINT TOTAL: TRAFFIC SIGNAL RATING SYSTEM APPROACH LANES TYPE OF TOTAL STREET 9:00 I~:0o IG:O~ 18:~ BOTH APPROACHES 2-2 LANES MAJOR STREET ~ 1799 1549 2zs9 z7~6 2-ONE WAY LANES CONBINED MINOR STREET ~ LANES /0.5 ASSIGNED POSSIBLE · SEE FIGURE 3.13(A) FOR POINTS. ~ 15 W;%~aANT 2 - IN,e_~ION OF CONTII~JOUS TRAFFIC APPROACH LANES 15:oc, /&:oo lT:c.~o 18:oc:, TOTAL BOTH APPROACHES NAJOR STREET 1755 27.5'1 ~((~ 27o(~ 933~ BOTH APPROACHES MINOR STREET 99 Iol NOTE: TO ASSIGN POINTS THE COMBINED MINOR STREET TOTAL MUST BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 300 VEHICLES IN A GIVEN FOUR HOUR PERIO0. ASSIGNED POSSIBLE SEE TABLE 3.13{B) FOR POINTS. /0 10 WE 3 - PEDESTRIAN VOLUME (TYPICALLY USED FOR SCHOOL XING INTERSECTIONS) SEE TABLE 3.13{C) FOR POINTS. iq~Pt 10 CktJRCHES, PUBLIC BUILDINGS, STEEP HILL, HORIZONTAL Ct.RVE, RESTRICTED SIGHT DISTANCE, ETC. -- CC~EKrs: N-A POINTS GIVEN BY TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S JUDGEMENT. TOTAL Iq 65 DATE 9-25-?'f BY OEN/SE Sc~r-rz~ 9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND UGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-1 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS CALC ~ DATE ."/'15-?'~ DIST CO RTE PM CEE ,,~"~ DATE Major St: po~A'{ ~ Critical Approach Speed -'¢0 mph MinorSt: Ankh cd / EV.qt45~ ~R. CriticalApproach Speed ~.,~ mph / Critical speed of major street traffic >_ 40 mph ............. I~ ) or RURAL (R) In built up ama of isolated community of < 10.000 pep .......... [] -- [] URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO ~ MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 80e/e SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS UlR UlR LANES I 2 or mom Cl;e0 .0(, :o: :cc .10~ 'c~ ,/~//~,'20 ,'o, Hour Both Apprchs. 500 350 600 Major Street (4OO) (280) (480) (~6)~ 1797 1554 15c1"1 I~,oZ /5';9 ~733 2Z$1 .~(a4t:~ --- HighestApprch. 150 f105'~ 200 .,MinorS~'eet (120) ~(84._._)] (160) (112) ~'7 5c/ ~'7 ?Z '70 ~o8 (o~/ GO WARRANT 2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] .... MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 80% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] sHowN SR^CKETS) u IR UIR Both Apprcfls. 750 525 900 /~0q''~ Hour MajorS~'eet (600) (420_) (720) ~504}/17q? IS3'~;Ifq9 Ieo-~l/5,[q /7~73 .9.~,~ ~,q6= Highest Apprch. 75 Minor Street (60) ~ 100 70 /0O7o /oO').) Ioo7, IOOo leo'?, I~'Zo /0o7,~ WARRANT 3 - Minimum Pedestrian Volume 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT FULFI~ ~ Fn Pedestrian volume crossing the major street is 100 or more for each of any four hours or is 190 or more during any one Yes [] No [] hour; AND There are less than 60 gaps per hour in the major street traf- fic stream of adequate length for pedestrians to cross; AND Yes [] No [] The nearest traffk: signal along the major street is greater than 300 feet; AND Yes [] No [] The new traffic signal will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow on the major street. Yes [] No [] The satlstactlon of a warrant la not necessarily Justification for a elgnaL Delay, congeetlon, conluslon or other evidence of the need tor right-of-way assignment must be shown. · ' ' Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-7 Figuro 0-2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 4 - School Crossings Not Applicable .......... J~ See School Crossings Warrant Sheet [] WARRANT 5 - Progressive Movement SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL FULFILLED > 1000 FT. N ~, S ft, E fi, W ft. YES [] NO [] ON ONE WAY ISOLATED STREETS OR STREETS WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE AND ADJACENT SIGNALS ARE SO FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING & SPEED CONTROL WOULD BE LOST ON 2-WAY STREETS WHERE ADJACENT SIGNALS DO NOT PROVIDE NECESSARY PLATOONING AND SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED SIGNALS COULD CONSTITUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM [] [] WARRANT 6- Accident Experience SATISFIED YES [] NO REQUIREMENTS WARRANT .~ FULFILLED ONE WARRANT WARRANT 1 - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED OR 80% WARRANT 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC ~/ YES ~ NO [] SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW J~ [] ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY [] ACC. WITHIN A 12 MONTH PERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR.& INVOLVING INJURY OR --> $500 DAMAGE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS 5 OR MORE .~ [] WARRANT 7 - Systems Warrant SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES .~ FULFILLED DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VEH/HR 1000 VEH/HR ................................... OR DURING EACH OF ANY 5 HRS. OF A SAT. AND/OR SUN. VEH/HR YES [~ NO [] CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR ST. MINOR ST. HWY. SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF, ENTERING, OR TRAVERSING A CITY APPEARS AS MAJOR ROUTE ON AN OFFICIAL PLAN ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS MET, BOTH STREETS [] [] The satisfaction of a warrant Is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignmnent must be shown. 9-8 ~' TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 8-Combination of Warrants SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT WARRANT ~/ FULFILLED TWO WARRANTS 1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED 80% 2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC V/' YES [] NO [] WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO [] 2 or Approach Lanes One more BolhApproaches Major Street I ~'"'11'-~=}~ 1'5~? I i(*0= I,§~¢~ HighestAppreaches -MinerS, re t Il * Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Delay SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND YES [] NO [] 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; ANp YES [] NO 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. YES [] NO [] WARRANT 11 - Peak Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO .~ 2or f f / - Approach Lanes One more 13,'oo ,/ ,/' ,/' Hour Highest Approaches - Minor Street * Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence ')f the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. -'/-3 ~:? I . t~ ,~- S /~_~_~t ~Zig 7-3o-9/ /7/8 CITY OF POWAY ITEM: i~CID~IY'BI~.4RI  TITLE: SCALE : ~'.7'S ATTACHMENT: ~8 · '9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS CALC ~, = ~ DATE ~-I~-q~ D ST co RTE PM C,K DATE Major St: E.~I~ (-~ ~-0 Critical Approach Speed '~ mph Minor St: ~un_~u L_~ ~ Critical Approach Speed o~~; mph Critical speed of major street traffic > 40 mph ..... [] -- - ....... or RURAL (R) J In built up area of isolated community of ~ 10,000 pop .......... [] [] URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] ~u-.~A,,~-,,-u ~r~-~ u NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) Major Street (400)~__~. (,mO) (336) l~I$21113~ ~1~ qql IZ3Z i~31'7/-~-~1 Highest Apprch, 150 ~,',~ 200 140 ~.orS~ O20)(Je,)_~ (t~o) (.2)~5 61 ~ Z2. ~'l IIG (~ WARRANT 2 - interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] 1~O%~SA]I~I-IEI~ YE~ IXl NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS O,o sHowN ,. R^CK S) u l(R) U IR A ROAOH ' ormore LANES Hour Both Apprchs, 750 /~2~ 900 630 Highest Apprch 75 ~ 100 70 /~7o 1~O7o -f??o ~Z?oJOO'7o/o,7,/00% WARRANT 3 - Minimum Pedestrian Volume 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT FULFILLED Pedestrian volume crossing the major street is 100 or more for each of any four hours or is 190 or more during any one Yes [] No [] hour; AND There are less than 60 gaps per hour in the major street traf- fic stream of adequate length for pedestrians to cross; AND Yes [] No [] The nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 feet; AND Yes [] No [] The new traffic signal will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow on the major street. Yes [] No [] The satisfaction of a warrant Is not necessarily justlflcetlon for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for Hght-of-way assignment must be shown. Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-7 Figure 9-2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 4 - School Crossings Not Applicable .......... ~[] See School Crossings Warrant Sheet [] WARRANT 5 - Progressive Movement SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL FULFILLED > 1000 FT. N ti, S ft, E ft. W tr. YES [] NO [] ON ONE WAY iSOLATED STREETS OR STREETS WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SiGNiFICANCE AND ADJACENT S"EED CONTROL PROPOSED S,GNALS COULD CONSTITUTE A PROGRESS,VE S,GNAL SYSTEM [] [] WARRANT 6- Accident Experience SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENTS WARRANT ~/ FULFILLED ONE WARRANT WARRANT 1 - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED ............................... OR 80% WARRANT 2- INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC V YES ~ NO [] SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW [~ [] ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY [] [] ACC. WITHIN A 12 MONTH PERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR & INVOLVING INJURY OR > $500 DAMAGE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS s OR MORE _ WARRANT 7 - Systems Warrant SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES ~/ FULFILLED DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VEH/HR 1000 VEFFHR .................................. [ -. OR DURING EACH OF ANY 5 HRS. OF A SAT. AND/OR SUN. _ VEH/HR YES [] NO [] CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR ST. MINOR ST. HWY. SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF. ENTERING. OR TRAVERSING A CITY ' O FE-O '.-OFFTC ........................ ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS MET. BOTH STREETS [] [] - The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way asslgnmnent must be shown. 50 9-8 "' TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS _ WARRANT 8- Combination of Warrants SATISFIED YES [] NO ~ REQUIREMENT WARRANT ./ FULFILLED TWO WARRANTS 1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED 80% 2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC YES [] NO [] WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO [] 2 or Approach Lanes One more I~:0~ ,/'~ oo ,/~/~.'o~/~,'~o Hour Both Approaches Major Street J i~{$?., l ll~ i,Z,.7~. I/~i-/ ~- Highest Approaches - UinorStreet /.~ ~5 I ~1 ~1 * Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Delay SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND YES [] NO [] 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for ~ _ one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND YES [] NO [] 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with tour or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. YES [] NO [] WARRANT 11 -Peak Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES ]~ NO [] 2 or -- Approach Lanes One more /(~,'0o/~/ / Hour Both Approaches Major Street /$17 I I'~ il Highest Approaches - Minor Street !J~ ~1 * Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. CITY OF POWAY ITEM: ,~,o~,rro,~ ~'~POLA SCALE: ~ ATTACHMENT 9-6 ' TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic ManuR! Figure 9-1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS CALC ~,~ C:~'~:r~ DATE -'DIST CO RTE PM CHK ,~//~ DATE Major ~: ~,~ P~ C~ ~ C~i~l ~roa~ S~ed., ~/' ~ mph Minor ~: ¢'L°~{)C.~FT ~ Criti~l ~proa~ S~ed ,~ ~, ~ mph Critical s~ed of major street tmff~ ~ ~ ~h ............. ~ ~ or RURAL (R) In bui~ up area of isolated commun~ of ~ 10,000 ~p .......... _ ~ URBAN (O) WARRA~ 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume 10~ SATISFIED YES ~% SATISFIED YES ~ MINIMUM REQUIREME~S (~% SHOWN IN BRACK~S) ~ APPROACH ~NES 2ormore ~:~ ~.~o,~.o~,.00~..o~:o~.,cHour ~th A~r~,. ~0 ~ ~0 ~jorS~t (400) (280) (~0) ~ 15~ 139G ~057 qq~ lOqs 1300 I~bO IdE¢ 1~7. -- Higher Appr~ 1~ ~ ~ ~norS~t (120) (1~) (112) ~ 5~ ,51 ~7 3~ ~ ~O WARRANT 2- Interruption of ~ntinuous Traffic 10~ SATISFIED YES MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ~% SATISFIED YES ~th Appr~s. 750 525 ~0 f ~0~ ~jorS~t (~) (420) (~0) ~(~ /5o~ /~G /o~7 q77~/o75 13~0 /~0 /~5~ High,t A~p,,.. 75 ~j 1~ WARRANT3- Minimum Pede~rian Volume 100% SATISFIED YES REQUIREMENT FULFIl I Fn Pedestrian volume crossing the major street is 100 or mom for each of any four houm or is 190 or more during any one Yes ~ No hour; AND ~ere are less than 60 gaps ~r hour in the major street traf- fic steam of adequate ~gth for ~destdans to cross; ~ Yes ~ No ~e nearest traff~ signal along the ~jor street ~ greater than 300 feet;~NQ Yes ~ No The new traffic signal will not seriously dJs~pt progressive traffic flow on the ~jor street. Yes ~ No The ~tlsfa~lon of a warrant Is not ne~ssarlly JustlfJ~tlon for a signal. Delay, conge~lon, confusion or other evidence of the ~d for right-of-way assignment mu~ ~ shown. " Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-7 Figure 9-2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 4 - School Crossings Not Applicable .......... ~ See School Crossings Warrant Sheet [] WARRANT 5 - Progressive Movement SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL FULFILLED ~ 1000 FT. N fi, S fi, E ft, W ft. YES [] NO [] ON ONE WAY ISOLATED STREETS OR STREETS WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE AND ADJACENT SIGNALS ARE SO FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING & SPEED CONTROL WOULD BE LOST ON 2-WAY STREETS WHERE ADJACENT SIGNALS DO NOT PROVIDE NECESSARY PLATOONING AND SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED SIGNALS COULD CONSTITUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM [] [] WARRANT 6- Accident Experience SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENTS WARRANT ~/; FULFILLED ONE WARRANT WARRANT 1 - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED . (~R'- ............................ 80% WARRANT 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC ~ YES [~ NO [] SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW [] [] ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY [] [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS 5 oR MORE 0 [] [] WARRANT 7 - Systems Warrant SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES ~/ FULFILLED DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VEH/HR 1000 VEHJHR OR DURING EACH OF ANY 5 HRS. OF A SAT AND/OR SUN. VEH/HR YES [] NO [] CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR ST. MINOR ST. HWY, SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF, ENTERING, OR TRAVERSING A CITY - ZP;~ ~-s~Z~-^;'o~ ~&~'ET~ ZN--OFFTC~L ?~ ..................... ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS MET, BOTH STREETS [] [] The satisfaction of a warrant Is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right*of-way assignmnent must be shown. TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 8- Combination of Warrants SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT WARRANT ,/ FULFILLED _- TWO WARRANTS 1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED 80% 2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC J,//' YES [] NO [] WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO Approach Lanes One more 9.0o r/~.,~a ,/'~-o;~o,,,~,~ Hour Both Approaches Major Street I~1II I/. 7m * Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Delay SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AN0 - YES [] NO [] 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for __ one moving lane of tratfic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND YES [] NO [] 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. YES [] NO [] WARRANT 11 - Peak Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO [] 2 or / // / Approach Lanes One more ~';~ ./ ,/ /' Hour Both Approaches Major Street ~ 15o.q Highest Approaches - Minor Street u,'" ~,~ * Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion confusion or other evidence the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. 55 E$~OLA RD CITY OF POWAY ~TEM,  ' TITLE : SCALE :.,~ ATTACHMENT 9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-1 -. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS CALC /~EW~,5~ ~-- ~ ..,~,, DATE DIST CO RTE PM CEE .~.~,~-~ DATE ~/,,/ ~ / Major ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [~ Cdtical ~proach S~ed '~ ~' ~ mph Minor~: ,~L, ~,:, (~'1~ Cr~ical~proachS~ed ~=~ mph CHtI~I s~ed of major street tmff~ ~ 40 ~h ............ ~ ~ or~ RURAL (R) In bui~ up area of isolated co~un~ of < 10,000 ~p. _ _ _ ~ URBAN (U) WARRA~ 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume 10~ SATISFIED YES ' MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ~% SATISFIED YES ~NES 1 2 or ~p~ ~4'~o :~ ~ ,'o~ _ ,.~, .~ . .. Hour ~rS~t (120) (~/ (1~) (112) ~ ~ ' WARRANT 2 - Interruption of ~ntinuous T~ffic 10~ SATISFIED YES ~% SATISFIED YES MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ~ SHOWN IN BRACKETS) ~ A~,d,~, 7~ 525 ~ ~0 ' . .... ~,7~ ~o ~rS~t (~0) (420) (~0) '(~) r~,~,~ ,~--~ ' ?;--" ~ '~ ~'~ ~2 '~ H~h~t ~pr~ 75 ~ 1~ ~'% ,.:~.~9c/~ 7c7~ 2<7o 7o7~ 73% 8/% - WARRANT 3 - Minimum Pede~rian Volume 10~ SATISFIED YES REQUIREMENT FULFIl I Fn Pedestrian volume crossing the major street is 100 or more for each of any four houm or ~ 190 or mom dudng any one Yes ~ No hour; AND There are less than 60 g~ ~r hour in the major street traf- f~ stream of a~quate ~ngth for ~destHans to cmss;~ Yes ~ No ~e nearest traffM s~nal along the major st~t is greater than 300 feet;AND Yes ~ No The new traff~ signal will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow on the ~jor street. Yes ~ No The ~tlsfa~lon of a wa~ant I$ not ne~ssarlly justlfl~tlon for a signal. Delay, conge~lon, confusion or other evIden~ of the n~ for right.f-way a~lgnme~ mu~ ~ shown. 57 " Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-7 Figure 9-2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 4 - School Crossings Not Applicable .......... ~ ~ See School Crossings Warrant Sheet [] WARRANT 5 - Progressive Movement SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL FULFILLED >1000FT. N ft, S ft, E ft, W ft.: YES[] NO[] ON ONE WAY ISOLATED STREETS OR STREETS WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE AND ADJACENT ~ SIGNALS ARE SO FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING & SPEED CONTROL WOULD BE LOST ON 2-WAY STREETS WHERE ADJACENT SIGNALS DO NOT PROVIDE NECESSARY PLATOONING AND SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED SIGNALS COULD CONSTITUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM [] [] WARRANT 6- Accident Experience SATISFIED YES [] NO REQUIREMENTS WARRANT ~ FULFILLED ONE WARRANT WARRANT 1 - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED OR 80% WARRANT 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC ¥/ YES ~ NO [] SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW [] [] ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY [] [] ACC. WITHIN A 12 MONTH PERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR. & INVOLVING INJURY OR --> $500 DAMAGE M,. MUM REQUIREMENT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS 5 OR MORE / [] [] WARRANT 7- Systems Warrant SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES ~ FULFILLED DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VEH/HR 1000 VEH/HR OR DURING EACH OF ANY 5 HRS. OF A SAT. AND/OR SUN. VEH/HR YES [] NO [] CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR ST. MINOR ST. HWY. SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF, ENTERING, OR TRAVERSING A CITY APPEARS A~MAJ~ RO~TE~N AN OFFICIAL PLAN ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS MET, BOTH STREETS [] ~J The satisfaction of a warrant Is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way asslgnmnent must be shown. TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS _ WARRANT 8- Combination of Warrants SATISFIED YES [] NO [~ REQUIREMENT WARRANT ..,/FULFILLED - TWO WARRANTS 1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED 80% 2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC L-' ~' YES [] NO [] WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO [~ -- 2 or ~ '~o Hour Both Approaches Major Street ~.~?. -- Highest Approaches - UinorStreet ~ I I ~ Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Delay SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) 1. The lotal delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND YES [] NO [] 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND YES [] NO [] 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. YES [] NO [] WARRANT 11 - Peak Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES .~ NO [] 2or/// Approach Lanes One more ~ ~ ',Od, Hour Both Approaches Major Street [//~ ,~,~, Highest Approaches - Minor Street * Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. : The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay. congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. 59 CITY OF POWAY ITEM: ~d"o~ a"~^~t~  TITLE : SCALE: ~ ATTACHMENT 9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS Major ~: ~~ ~ CHti~l ~roach S~ed ~,~ / mph Minor ~: ~C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Cdtical ~proach S~ed ~ ~ mph C~ical s~ed of major street tmff~ ~ 40 ~h ............. ~ ~ or~ RURAL(R) In buiE up area of isolated ~un~ of ~ 10,000 ~p .......... ~ URBAN (U) WARRA~ 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume 10~ SATISFIED YES ~ NO MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ~% SATISFIED YES (~% SHOWN IN BRACKETS APPROACH Ui~rS~t (120) ~ (1~) (112) ~O 9O 50 5~ ~*1 ~g T~ 7~7~ g~7o 4BTo 5470~97o ~5% 7070 5~ 7~ : WARRANT 2 - Interruption of ~ntinuous Traffic 10~ SATISFIED YES ~ NO MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ~% SATISFIED YES ~ NO u 14R) u Hour ~ Appr~s. 7~ 525 ~0 H~h~t A~r~. 75 ~ 1~ 70 WARRANT 3 - Minimum Pede~rian Volume 10~ SATISFIED YES ~ NO REQUIREMENT FULFU ~ Fn Pedestrian volume crossing the ~jor street ~ 100 or mom for each of any four houm or is 190 or mom du~ng any one Yes ~ No hour; AND There are less than 60 g~s ~r hour in the major street traf- f~ stream of adequate ~ngth for ~destHans to cm~; AND Yes ~ No ~e nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 feet;AND Yes ~ No ~e new traff~ s~nal will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow on the ~jor street. Yes ~ No The ~tlsfa~lon of a wa~ant Is not ~arlly Ju~lfl~tlon for a signal Delay, congestion, confusion or other evlden~ of the n~ for right.f-way assignment must ~ shown. 61 Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-7 Figure 9-2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 4 - School Crossings Not Applicable .......... See School Crossings Warrant Sheet [] WARRANT 5 - Progressive Movement SATISFIED YES [] NO [] I" MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL FULFILLED ~ 1000 FT. N It, s ft, E ft, W ft. YES [] NO [] ON ONE WAY ISOLATED STREETS OR STREETS WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE AND ADJACENT SIGNALS ARE SO FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING & SPEED CONTROL WOULD BE LOST ON 2-WAY STREETS WHERE ADJACENT SIGNALS DO ~'OT PROVIDE NECESSARY PLATOONING AND SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED SIGNALS COULD CONSTITUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM [] [] WARRANT 6- Accident Experience SATISFIED YES [] NO REQUIREMENTS WARRANT ,~ FULFILLED ONE WARRANT - WARRANT 1 - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED ............................... OR 80% WARRANT 2- INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC ~'/ YES [~ NO [] SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW [] [] ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY [] [] ACC. WITHIN A 12 MONTH PERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR & INVOLVING INJURY OR :> $500 DAMAGE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS 5 OR MORE I [] [] WARRANT 7 - Systems Warrant SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES ~/ FULFILLED DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VEH/HR I000 VEH/HR OR DURING EACH OF ANY 5 HRS. OF A SAT. AND/OR SUN. VEH/HR YES [] NO [] CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR ST. MINOR ST. HWY. SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF, ENTERING, OR TRAVERSING A CITY ^PPEARS S OU 'E AN OF C,AL PLAN ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS MET, BOTH STREETS [] [] The satisfaction of a warrant Is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way asslgnmnent must be shown. ~-8 " TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ~_ WARRANT 8- Combination of Warrants SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT WARRANT ../ FULFILLED TWO WARRANTS 1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED 80% 2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC ~/ YES [] NO [] WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO [] -- 2 or Approach Lanes One more ~:oo/~7/oO,/~&:~,/~,?.,~oHour Both Approaches Major Street I I w" 11/ 4/l,s l - HJghestApproaches - Minor Street ~ 1190 173 * Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Delay SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND ' YES [] NO [] 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for ~. one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; ANID YES [] NO [] 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. YES [] NO [] WARRANT 11 -Peak Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES ~ NO [] 2 or . / / / Approach Lanes One more ~,.~x~ / / // Hour Both Approaches Maior Street Highest Approaches - Minor Street * Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence · 3f the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. CITY OF POWAY ~TEM: ~C.,~.~,~ · TITLE: ~ SCALE: ~ ATTACHMENT 9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual 1-1992 Figure 9-1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS CALC DISNISE .5~T~AOH DATE J-'~l-~'~ DIST CO RTE PM CHK /~ Z,/~' DATE ~//~/q .~ Major St: ~'w~ 10~,~v-~ ~.Q Cdtical Approach Speed "~, ~ mph Minor St: P,d.ou I P L.,.) Critical Approach Speed ~5 mph Critical speed of major street traffic > 40 mph ........ [] '~ ...... or RURAL (R) In built up area of isolated community of < 10,000 pop .......... [] [] URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] UU%~AII~SPI[-U YE5 L_I NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS ul® APPLARNO;sCH I 2or more ,~',~/ ,~ y o~/' ~ ~' ,,~a-~ ...~/~-~.o~./~/~.~Hour Both Apprchs. 500 350 600 /',~0"~ MajorStmet (400) (280) (480) ~3,36.y I°zl /B~, /2'9-;/ 6oG /7,~ /~,&? /27% ~xS~ /,oo~ Highest Apprch. 150 ~ 200 140 UinorSlreet (120) !(160) (112) -~ 4~ ~ *'~1 /21 (~Z 55 ~7 ~ WARRANT 2- Interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO 80% SATISFIED YES Lt NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) APPROACH 1 2 or more LANES ~ Hour Both Apprchs. 750 525 900 i ~30) MajorSb'eet (600) (4_20) (720),~..,.~ (%c3(oi/29~ /207 15~7 17%8 /5~2 /G&7 IZ7o /oo~/- Highest Apprch. 75 ~ 100 70 M~,orSUe~ (6O)4k~:/(6O)(56)4.3 8-~ 3. i,29 12! 20 Gl- ~3 ?~/o WARRANT 3- Minimum Pedestrian Volume 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT FULFILLED Pedestrian volume crossing the major street is 100 or more for each of any four hours or is 190 or more dudng any one Yes [] No [] hour; AND There are less than 60 gape per hour in the major street traf- fic stream of adequate length for pedestrians to cross; AND Yes [] No [] The nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 feet; AND Yes [] No [] The new traffic signal will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow on the major street. Yes [] No [] The astlsfactlon of a warrant Is not necaeearlly justification for a signal Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for fight-of-way assignment must be shown. rraffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-7 1-1992 Figure 9-2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 4 - School Crossings Not Applicable .......... [] See School Crossings Warrant Sheet J~ WARRANT 5 - Progressive Movement SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL FULFILLED > 1000 FT. N f~, S ft, E It, W ft. YES [] NO [] ON ONE WAY ISOLATED STREETS OR STREETS WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE AND ADJACENT SIGNALS ARE SO FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING & SPEED CONTROL WOULD BE LOST ON 2-WAY STREETS WHERE ADJACENT SIGNALS DO NOT PROVIDE NECESSARY PLATOONING AND SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED S~GNALS COULD CONSTITUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM [] [] WARRANT 6- Accident Experience SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENTS WARRANT ,~ FULFILLED ONE WARRANT WARRANT 1 - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATiSFiED ................................ OR 80% WARRANT 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC YES [] NO [] - SIGNAL W~LL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW [] [] ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY [] [~ ACC. WITHIN A 12 MONTH PERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR. & INVOLVING INJURY OR >- $500 DAMAGE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS 5 OR MORE // [] [] WARRANT 7 - Systems Warrant SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM VOLUME VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES ,~ FULFILLED ENTERING REQUIREMENT DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VEH/HR 1000 VEl-I/HR ................................... OR DURING EACH OF ANY 5 HRS. OF A SAT. AND/OR SUN. VEH/HR YES [] NO [] CHARACTERiSTiCS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR ST. MINOR ST. HWY. SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF. ENTERING. OR TRAVERSING A CITY APPEARS AS MAJOR ROUTE ON AN OFFICIAL PLAN ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS MET, BOTH STREETS [] [] The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily Justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignmnent must be shown. 66 9-~3 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 0-3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS -- WARRANT 8- Combination of Warrants SATISFIED YES [] NO [~L REQUIREMENT WARRANT ,/ FULFILLED TWO WARRANTS 1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED 80% 2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC YES [] NO [~ WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO ~ Approach Lanes One more c~/' y ,~// * Hour Both Approaches Major Street -~ j'7.~ I 175~, I /&~'7 /~'7o -' HighestApproaches - MinorStreet .~ ~4 I17-1 [ ("?'" 5..~ · Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Delay SATISFIED YES [] NO [] _~ (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five -. vehicle-hours tora two-lane approach; AND YES [] NO [] 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for __ one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph tot two moving lanes; AND YES [] NO [] 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph -- for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. YES [] NO [] WARRANT 11 - Peak Hour Volume SATISFIED YES j~ NO [] 2 or ,00 / / / - Approach Lanes One more I~' / // // Hour Both Approaches Major Street ~ /~[~ _.. Highest Approaches - Minor Street * Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence f the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. 67 9-10 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual 1-1992 Figure 9-5 , SCHOOL PROTECTION WARRANTS DIST CO RTE PM CHK DATE Major St: "~"//d/A,/ P~AY.~' ~ Critical Approach Speed ~ S mph Minor St: ~A~/x/ ~ Critical Approach S~ed ~ mph Critical s~ed of major street traffic ~ 40 mph .............. ~ ~ or~ RURAL(R) In buiE up area of isolated community of ~ 10,000 pop ........... ~ ~ URBAN (U) FLASHING YELLOW SCHOOL SIGNALS SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) Minimum Requirements PARTA U R ? Each et Vehicle Volume 2 hours 200 140 SATISFIED YES [] NO [] School Age Pedestrian.~ Each of 40 40 Crossing Street 2 hours AND PART B Critical Approach Speed Exceeds 35 mph SATISFIED YES [] NO [] AND PART C Is nearest controlled crossing more than 600 feet away? SATISFIED YES [] NO [] SCHOOL AREA TRAFFIC SIGNALS SATISFIED YES [] NO J~ (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) Minimum Requirements~l,3 / n,' U _ - PARTA U ~ ~'\'/~P / Vehicle Volume 2EaChhours°f 500 ~ i.~' ~D ~ Rachel 100 ~ 5~ ~~ SATISFIED YES ~ NO ~ ~hool Age Pedestrians _ ~ h~u~ ............... Crossing Street ~ ~r ~y 500 350 AND PART B Is nearest controlled crossing morethan 600 feet away? SATISFIED YES ~ NO ~ 68 1700 CITY OF POWAY ~TEM: ~,O~,A~a~ ' TITLE : ~.~w~M ~ SCALE: ,~ ATTACHMENT SIGNAUZED INTERSECTIONS ACCIDENT DIAGRAMS LEGEND O Non-injury accident , C~'-~ Vehicle backed up ~ Injury accident · O~ Left turn/through ~ · Fatal accident ~ Sideswipe VRW Violation of right-of-way ~' (~ Right angle accident INA'ri' Inattention · O · Rear end accident - RRL Ran red light ,-I-I Hit stationary object ESS Exceeded safe speed ~ Vehicle lost control DUI Driving under the influence CONST Construction UNK Unknown FTC Following too close · Res Ran stop sign HR Hit and run ILC Illegal lane change ULC Unsafe lane change DV Disabled vehicle SIG MAL Signal malfunction . IT Improper/illegal turn 7O CITY OF POWAY ~: ~'~'~'~' ~z~.~: ~ff~'r ~r ~ 'SCALE: N~r~ ATTAC]~I~ENT: ~ ,SI6Xl4 ~- 7"4/,R,,,V TWO INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS OCCURRED AFTER SIGNAL ACTIVATED ON 9-7-93 CITY OF POWAY iTE~: AC~/OENr TITLE: CIVIC. CF~IERD~ ~ 'SCALE: ~5 ATTACHMENT: 72 / ~31 ~ / ACCIDENT STATUS yEAR ~$ATAL ~JURY pROP. D~ TOTAL ~ 0 ~ 2 ~ 0 i I JANgARY T0 JUNE ONE ~NTERSECT~ON ACC[DENT ~CU~ED AFTER S~GNAL ACTIVATED ON 7~23-92 CITY OF POWAY ITEM: ~"~-~'~ c O~/w uNtTyRO/ TITLE: ~/~te~v ~ 'SCALE: A/T5 ATTACHMENT: ~ 7~ NO INT~,SECTfON ACCIDENTS FOR THE PA,ST THREE YEAR~S. I ~ I CITY OF POWAY TITLE: SCALE : Nrg ATTACHMENT ~. 51GN~Z AETIVAT~ I CITY OF POWAY  TITLE: SCALE :  COIWklUNITY ROAD CITY OF POWAY ~TEM: ~4~IDE'NTDIAC~P~f4 CO~PIUAIIT? RD./  TITLE: .~ rh ~E SCALE: ~,~ ATTACHMENT: ,~CC/DEl, IT ~ OCr. U£1~EO AFTER ~/6A/AI TURAI OAI. CITY OF POWAY ~T~: ~,.~ ~,~ TITLE: O~z ~/~r~ SCALE: ~5 ATTACHMENT: ~ LAKE POWAY ,,,, ,. o ~- I o Acc~n~ ~ ~s O- CITY OF POWAY  TITLE: SCALE: ESPOLA RD I-t~ VK'd )'C4~ 4L;~o-q r NO INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS AFTER SIGNAI. ACTIVATED ON 5-26-92 CITY OF POWAY ZTEU: ~tt~r~jA~M .~_~POLt~ ~D. t.  TITLE: ~RT/~OITRO SCALE: ~ ATTACHMENT: ' /~ ACCIDEI4~ STATUS - ,,,, 0 0 0 0 ONE INTERSECTION ACCIDENT OCCURRED AFTER SIGNAL ACTIVATED ON 5-22-92 CITY OF POWAY ~TEM : ,4?.~IDENT fJl,4~qRAM ESPOZr~ RD / TITLE: SIIMRI£RF/~ZDZI~ SCALE: /~/~-~ ATTACHMENT: // TI'lAN W,~Y []"~/"~l,~-~311g,q.3 EDEN GROVE I~,zl~ , ' ~ 'N, ~'~ II ~ CITY OF POWAY ~TE~: ~c~-~/~/~ ~$POZX~ I~OZ ~/~A~ WA Y SCALE : ~T~" ATTACHMENT: 12 82 ~FTS'R ~I61~AL TUI~ O~ N HILL E-A,~ ~ T~EE INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS ~CU~ED AFTER SIGNAL ACTIVATED ON 7-23-92 CITY OF POWAY ~: ~rr/o~ot~s ~IDL~ND RD / TITLE: ~ILL RARY /°LA'CE ~ SCALE: A/X5 ATTAOHM~NT: ' /~ 8~ 130' b( CITY OF POWAY z~: SCALE: NT~ ATTACHMENT: 8~ ~ 0¢50 CITY OF POWAY iTE~,  TITLE: SCALE: ~ ATTACHMENT 12_ CITY OF POWAY ~: ~'~~  TITLE: ~Z~ ~ SCALE: ~-~ ATTACHMENT: ' /7 MEADOWBRO'~OKx ~ ~'~o~i~o~ I o I o I c I o l/ , I o / ~ ~ Il / I q I' CITYOF POWAY ~: ~~'~ TITL~ ~ ~E~O~ ~ ~ SCALE:NTS ATTACHMENT: 88 T~3 INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS OCCURRED AFTER SIGNAL ACTIVATED ON 1-10-91. CITY OF POWAY ~: ~c~.r~~ TITLE : ~TAT~ ~ SCALE : NT5 ATTACHMENT ~ I ? ~7 ~-/~ -q/ ~ i 9-%q~-~L O^K KNOLL RO R~ '13~ ~ ~ I~ % TEN INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS ~CU~ED AFTER SIGNAL ACTIVATED ON 5-21-92 CITY0F POWAY ~: ~~o,~c~  TITLE: h~g g~oaa ~0 SCALE: ~T5 ATTACHMENT: ~0 90 OSPITAL DWY CITY OF POWAY IT,.M: TITLE: ~ SCALE : ~r~ ATTACHMENT: 2/ 91 ~ ~ goo DV CITY OF POWAY ~: SCALE : ~s ATTACHMENT: 92 POMERADO ROAD CITY OF POWAY ITEM: ~£~/l~X/~-O,,~.~M Po~ oo ~o. /  TITLE: _~m~/.--_ ~_. SCALE: NT5 ATTACHMENT: 2~ 93 N CItY O~  TITLE: r~-z) ~//~.u,~ P~wy SCALE : .A/'r.~' ATTACHMENT: 2'% T~N ' . C~[NO DEL ~RTE % ~'~'~ f~_~-,~ ~ - CITY OF POWAY ~.: ACCIDB~ D~AG~ C~NO DEL ~RTB/ CITY OF POWAY  TITLE: P6~AV~D SCALE CITY OF POWAY ~TEM= ~c~ TITLE: POWAY RD/COMMUNITY RD SCALE: ATTACHMENT 98 CITY OF POWAY ITEM, ~,/~¢'~7'  TITLE: /~/~ v ~.o, SCALE : NI$ ATTACHMENT \ ~ OARDE~ ROAC '-'" -'~'"""' "-'?, ,, O, 0 CITY OF POWAY ITEM: Po ~/,~ y ,,e,~. /  TITLE: SCALE: NJ5 ATTACHMENT: i040)- P O¢~IAY ROAD ~O INTERS ECTION ACCIDENTS ~CU~ED AFTER SIGNAL ACTIVATED OR 9-15-92. CITY OF POWAY ZTEM: SCALE: ~5 ATTACHMENT: '~0 101 ___.~// POWAY RD. 1~15 / CITY OF POWAY SCALE : POMERADO RD CITY OF POWAY iT,.M, .ACCIDENT DIAC.-RAN  TITLE: POWAY/POMERADO NTS SCALE : ATTACHMENT: ,~ 104 CITY OF POWAY ~*~: ~'~  TITLE: SCALE: ~T5 ATTACHMENT 105 CITY OF POWAY  TITLE: SCALE : 106 CITY OF POWAY :~T~, ~ee/¢¢~r¢,~,~  TITLE : 7';4,~,?,-.,~, D~ SCALE : A/7-J ATTACHMENT: .., 3(2 NO INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS AFTER SIGNAL ACTIVATED ON 9-23-92. CITY OF POWAY ITEM; ,~=,~,,~,,,,-,~,,,,~,~ _~C£1FE5. I~U,~¥ pKwY/  TITLE: HI, RI./H,4tw. RD. SCALE: ~IT5 ATTACHMENT: ~-~ 108 TWIN PEAKS/COMMUNITY /~ TITLE: SCALE: ~rs ATTACHMENT: · 109 o~ 05  PEAKS RD TWIN /~o N CITY OF POWAY IT,,M: ACCIDENT DIAGRAM :: ~ ' TITLE: TWIN PEAKS/ESPOLA SCALE': NTS ATTACHMENT: 110 TWIN PEAKS RD CITY OF POWAY ~T~: .,ACCIDE~ DIAG~  TITLE : ~IN P~S/MID~D RD SCALE: ~s ATTACHMENT: 40 111 CITY OF POWAY ITEM: ,~,,~,~- ~,~  TITLE: .~//_VF~ .~ SCALE: ~ ATTACHMENT: ~/ 11~ i_g.9"~'~'''' ' 2240 Du I 1~I4-~Z 0040 , ~ ~ P~KS ROAD 120~ CITY OF POWAY ~TEM:  TITLE: SCALE: rots ATTACHMENT CITY OF POWAY ITE~: ,~,,~,,.- p,~,~  TITLE: ?/~-~ ~ ~0 SCALE: ~ ATTACHMENT: W3 114 TRAFFIC SIGNAL RATING SYSTEM PRIORITY RANKING The purpose of the pdority rating system is to impartially rank all intersections so qualifying. This rating is used to make recommendations for the installation of signals under various City improvement programs. It also provides a running inventory of intersections to be resurveyed periodically for significant changes in operating conditions. This system is based on warrants for traffic signals. Points are added and the intersections arranged by descending number of points to form a pdority list. A. Warrant No. I - Total Vehicular Voluma Points are dependent upon the major and minor street volumes entedng the intersection. Points are also dependent upon the intersection capacity. A maximum of 15 points may be assigned to this warrant. The volumes are based on a 4-hour count. Figure No. 313(A) assigns points to this warrant. B. Warrant No. 2 - Interru_ofion of Continuous Traffi.~ Vehicles on through streets, if uncontrolled, tend to travel through minor street intersections at speeds that make it difficult and hazardous for vehicles and pedestrians from the side street to cross or enter the principal traffic stream. The total of the minor street vehicles plus pedestrians crossing or entering the major street must exceed 300 in four hours to receive any points. A maximum of 10 points may be assigned to this warrant. Table 3.13(B) assigns points to this warrant. C. Warrant No. 3 - Pedestrian Volum,~ A traffic signal may be needed where many pedestrians cross a major street. A maximum of 10 points may be assigned to this warrant. Figure 3.13(C) assigns points to this warrant. D. Warrant No. 6 - Accident Only those accidents susceptible to correction by traffic signals are considered and then only if less restrictive measures such as warning signs, proper lighting, painted markings, etc., have failed. A maximum of 15 points may be assigned to this warrant. Table No. 3.13(D) assigns points to this warrant. 115 E. Warrant No. 10 - SDeClal Conditlo~= This warrant considers extenuating circumstances that are not covered in the previous five warrants. These may include: The proximity of schools, churches, public buildings, and other traffic and pedestrian generators; an abrupt change from a rural to an urban area; the need for police control during portions of the day; a steep hill; a horizontal curve; restricted sight distance. This warrant requires engineering judgment based on physical inspection of the site. A maximum of 15 points may be assigned to this warrant, 116 LOCATION: POINT TOTAL: TRAFFIC SIGNAL RATING SYSTEM NAF~tANT 1 - TOTAL VEHICULAR VOLLI4E APPROACH LANES TYPE OF TOTAL STREET BOTH APPROACHES 2-2 LANES MAJOR STREET 1-2 &1-4 LANES 2-4 LANES 2-ONE WAY LANES COMBINED MINOR STREET LANES ASSIGNED POSSIBLE SEE FIGURE 3.13(A) FOR POINTS. 15 WN~ 2 - IN'et~ION OF CONTII~JOUS TRAFFIC APPROACH LANES TOTAL BOTH APPROACHES NAJOR STREET BOTH APPROACHES MINOR STREET NOTE: TO ASSIGN POINTS THE CONBINED MINOR STREET TOTAL NUST BE EQUAL TO OR (~EATER THAN 300 VEHICLES TN A GIVEN FOUR HOUR PERIO0, ASSIGNED POSSIBLE SEE TABLE 3.13(B) FOR POINTS. 10 MA~ 3 - PI~IAN VOLUI~ (TYPICALLY USED FOR SCHOOL XING INTERSECTIONS) SEE TABLE 3.13(C) FOR POINTS. 10 N 6 - ACCIDENT ~ (USED ON ACCIDENTS SUSCEPTIBLE TO COF~ECTION BY A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND ONLY IF LESS RESTRICTIVE HEASURE$ HAVE FAILED. ) NOTE: USE THE AVERAGE OF THE LAST TWO YEARS. SEE TABLE 3.13(D) FOR POINTS. 15 ~ 10 - SI~:CIAL CONDITIONS: SCHOOLS, C~MES, PUBLIC BUILDINGS, STEEP MILL, I-IOIRIZONTAL Ct~E, RESTRICTED SI(~-IT DISTANCE, ETC. COMMENTS: 15 POINTS GIVEN BY TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S JUDGEMF. NrF, TOTAL 65 DATE BY 118 WARRANT 'el {TOTAL VOLUME) W~2 ~/~~~~) W~~ (PED~TRI~ Table 3.T3 (B) T~ ~1~C) NOTES 16~0- 1949 I 1950 - ~0 - ~49 3 ~0 - ~9 4 ~50 - 3149 5 ~50- 3749 7 , 4~0 - ~er I0 w~ e6 ~C~ 3 8 8 12 12 13 13 Not~: Use thq hm ~en in ~mtlon fm Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-1 4-1992 CHAPTER 9 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Signals, Basic Information and Warrants 9-01 9-01.1 Introduction Improper or unwarranted signal installations may cause: A traffic signal is an electrically powered traffic control device, other than a barricade 1. Excessive delay. warning light or steady burning electric lamp, by which Waffle is warned or directed to take some 2. Disobedience of the signal indications. specific action. The following types and uses of traffic signals 3. Circuitous travel of alternate routes. are discussed in this chapter: Traffic Control Signals, Pedestrian Crossing Signals, Ramp 4. Inereased accidentfrequency. Metering Signals, Flashing Beacons, Lane-use Control Signals, Traffic Control at Movable Experience shows that the number of Bridges, Priority Control of Traffic Signals, right-angle collisions may decrease after the Traffic Signals for One-lane, Two-way Facilities installation of signals, but the number of rear-end and Traffic Signals for Construction Zones. collisions may increase. The installation of Traffic control signals are valuable devices for signals may increase overall delay and reduce the control of vehicle and pedestrian traffic, intersection capacity. Consequently, it is of the However, because they assign the right of way to utmost importance that the consideration of a the various traffic movements, traffic control signal installation and the selection of equipment signals exert a significant influence on traffic be preceded by a thorough study of traffic and flow. roadway conditions made by an engineer Traffic control signals, properly located and experienced and trained in this field. Equally operated, should have one or more of the important is the need for checking the efficiency following advantages: of a traffic signal in operation. This determines 1. They provide for the orderly movement of the degree to which the type of installation and traffic, the timing program meet the requirements of traffic. 2. Where proper physical layouts and control 9-0'1.2 Trafll¢ Signal Warrants measures are used, they increase the traffic handling capacity of the intersection. The justification for the installation of a traffic signal at an intersection is based on the warrants 3. They reduce the frequency of certain types stated in this Manual and in the Manual On of accidents, especially the fight angle Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The decision type. to install a signal should not be based solely upon the warrants, since the installation of traffic 4. Under favorable conditions, they can be signals may increase certain types of collisions. coordinated to provide for continuous or Delay, congestion, approach conditions, driver nearly continuous movement of traffic at a confusion, future land use or other evidence of definite speed along a given route, the need for right of way assignment beyond that which could be provided by stop signs must be 5. They permit minor street traffic, vehicular demonstrated. See Section 4-03 of this Manual or pedestrian, to enter or cross continuous for stop sign warrants. traffic on the major street. 120 9-2 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual When the 85th pementile speed of traffic on B. Warrant 2 - Interruption of Continuous the major sucet exceeds 40 miles per hour in Traffic. either an urban or rural area, or when the intersection lies within the built-up area of an The Interruption of Continuous Traffic isolated community having a population of less warrant applies to operating conditions where the than 10,000, the location is considered rural. All traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that other areas are considered urban, traffic on a minor intersecting street suffers Figures 9-1, 9-2, 9-3 and 9-4 are examples of excessive delay or hazard in entering or crossing warrant sheets. Warrant Sheet 9-4 should be the major street. The warrant is satisfied when, used only for new intersections or other locations for each of any 8 hours of an average day, the where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted, traffic volumes given in the table below exist on The installation of a traffic signal should be the major street and on the higher-volume minor considered if one or more of the warrants listed street approach to the intersection, and the signal below are met: installation will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow. A. Warrant 1 - Minimum Vehicle Volume. Number of Vehicles per Vehicles per The Minimum Vehicular Volume warrant is lanes for hour on hour on intended for application where the volume of moving major street higher-volume intersecting traffic is the principal reason for trafficon (total of bothminor-street consideration of a signal installation. The each approach approaches) approach(one warrant is satisfied when for each of any 8 hours ~ of an average day the traffic volumes given in the direction only) table below exist on the major street and on the Major St. Minor St. Urban Rural Urban Rural higher-volume minor street approach to the 1 I 750 525 75 53 intersection. 2 or more 1 900 630 75 53 2ormore 2ormore 900 630 100 70 Number of Vehicles per Vehicles per 1 2 or more 750 525 100 70 lanes for hour on hour on moving major s~'eet higher-volume The major street and the minor street volumes traffic on (total of both minor-sUv~t are for the same 8 hours. During those 8 hours each approach approaches) approach (one the direction of higher volume on the minor direction only) sm:et may be on one approach during some hours and on the opposite approach during other Major St. Minor St. Urban Rural Urban Rural hours. 1 I 500 350 150 105 2 or more 1 600 420 150 105 C. Warrant 3 Minimum Pedestrian 2 or more 2 or mc~e 600 420 200 140 Volume. I 2ormore 500 350 200 140 A traffic signal may be warranted where the The major street and the minor street volumes pedestrian volume crossing the major street at an are for the same 8 hours. During those 8 hours intersection or mid-block location during an the direction of higher volume on the minor average day is: street may be on one approach during some hours and on the opposite approach during other hours. 100 or more for each of any four hours; or 190 or more during any one hour. 121 Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-3 4-1992 The pedestrian volume crossing the major control of vehicles would otherwise be street may be reduced as much as 50% of the lost; or values given above when the predominant pedes- than crossing speed is below 3.5 feet per second. 2. On a two-way street, where adjacent sig- In addition to a minimum pedestrian volume of nals do not provide the necessary degree that stated above, there shall be less than 60 gaps of platooning and speed control and the per hour in the traffic stream of adequate length proposed and adjacent signals could con- for pedestrians to cross during the same period stitute a progressive signal system. . when the pedestrian volume criterion is satisfied. Where there is a divided street having a median The installation of a signal according to this of sufficient width for the pedestrian(s) to wait, warrant should be based on the 85th percentile the requirement applies separately to each speed unless an engineering study indicates that direction of vehicular traffic, another speed is more desirable. Where coordinated traffic signals on each side The installation of a signal according to this of the study location provide for platooned traffic warrant should not be considered where the which result in fewer than 60 gaps per hour of resultant signal spacing would be less than 1,000 adequate length for the pedestrians to cross the feet. street, a traffic signal may not be warranted. _ This warrant applies only to those locations F. Warrant 6-Accident Experience. where the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 feet and where a new The Accident Experience warrant is satisfied traffic signal at the study location would not when: ' unduly restrict platooned flow of traffic. Curbside parking at non-intersection locations 1. Five or more reported accidents of types should be prohibited for 100 feet in advance of susceptible to correction by traffic signal and 20 feet beyond the crosswalk, control have occurred within a 12-month A signal installed under this warrant should be period, each accident involving personal of the waffic-actuated type with push buttons for injury or property damage to an apparent pedestrians crossing the main street. If such a extent of $500 or more; AND signal is installed within a signal system, it shall be coordinated if the signal system is 2. Adequate trial of less reswictive remedies coordinated, with satisfactory observance and Signals installed according to this warrant enforcement has failed to reduce the shall be equipped with pedestrian indications accident frequency; AND conforming to requirements set forth in other .- sections of this Manual. 3. There exists a volume of vehicular traffic not less than 80% of the requirements D, Warrant 4 - School Areas. specified in the Minimum Vehicular _ Volume Warrant or the Interruption of See Chapter 10 of this Manual. Continuous Traffic Warrant; AND E. Warrant5. Progressive Movemen~ 4. The signal installation will not seriously · disrupt progressive uaffic flow. The Progressive Movement warrant is satisfied when: G. Warrant 7. Systems Warrant. 1. On a one-way slreet or on a street which A traffic signal installation at some has predominantly unidirectional traffic, intersections may be warranted to encourage adjacent signals are so far apart that the concennation and organization of traffic flow necessary degree of platooning and speed networks. The systems warrant is applicable 122 9-4 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual 4-1992 when the common intersection of two or more J. Warrant I0- Peak Hour Delay Warrant. major routes has a total existing, or immediately -- projected, entering volume of at least 1,000 The Peak Hour Delay Warrant is intended for vehicles during the peak hour of a typical application where traffic conditions are such that weekday, or each of any five hours of a Saturday for one hour of the day, minor street traffic and/or Sunday. suffers undue delay in entering or crossing the A major route as used in the above warrant has major street. The peak hour delay warrant is one or mom of the following characteristics: satisfied when the conditions given below exist for one hour (any four consecutive 15-minute - 1. It is part of thc street or highway system periods) of an average weekday. The peak hour that serves as the principal network for delay warrant is met when: through traffic flow; - 1. The total delay experienced by traffic, on 2. It includes rural or suburban highways one minor street approach controlled by a outside of, entering or traversing a city; or STOP sign, equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and - 3. It appears as a major route on an official five vehicle-hours for a two-lane plan such as a major street plan in an approach; AND urban area traffic and transportation study. 2. The volume on the same minor street H. Warrant8. Combination of Warrants. approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for In exceptional cases, a signal may be justified two moving lanes; AND where no single warrant is satisfied but where Warrants 1 and 2 are satisfied to the extent of 80 3. The total entering volume serviced during percent or more of the stated numerical values, the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches 1. Warrant 9 - Four Hour Volume Warrant. or 650 vph for intersections with three The Four Hour Volume Warrant is satisfied, approaches. when for each of any four hours of an average K. Warrant I1 Peak Hour Volume day, the plotted points representing the vehicles Warrant. per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per The Peak Hour Volume Warrant is intended hour on the higher volume minor street approach for application where traffic conditions are such (one direction only) all fall above the curve in that for one hour of the day minor street traffic Figure 9-6 for the existing combination of suffers undue delay in entering or crossing the approach lanes, major street. When the 85th percentile speed of the major The peak hour volume warrant is satisfied street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, or when when the plotted point, representing the vehicles the intersection lies within a built-up area of an per hour on the major street (total of both isolated community having a population of less approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per than 10,000, the four hour volume requirement is hour on the higher volume minor street approach -'- satisfied when the plotted points referred to fall (one direction only) for one hour (any four above the curve in Figure 9-7 for the existing consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average combination of approach lanes, day, falls above the curve in Figure 9-8 for the ' existing combination of approach lanes. 123 Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-5 449g~ When the 85th percentile speed of major street Protected left turn phases should be considered traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, or when the where such alternatives cannot be utilized, and intersection lies within a built-up area of an one or more of the following conditions exist: isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, the peak hour volume warrant is 1. Accidents. Five or more left turn _ satisfied when the plotted point, referred to accidents for a particular left turn above, fails above the curve in Figure 9-9 for the movement during a recent 12-month existing combination of approach lanes, period. 9-01.3 Guidelines for Left-Turn Phases 2. Delay. Left-turn delay of one or more vehicles which were waiting at thc Since separate signai phases for protected left beginning of the green interval and are turns will reduce the green time available for still remaining in the left turn lane after at other phases, alternate means of handling left least 80% of the total number of cycles for turn conflicts should be considered fa'st, one hour. The most likely possibilities are: 3. Volume. At new intersections where only 1. Prohibition of left turns. This can be done estimated volumes are available, the fol- only if there are convenient aiternate lowing criteria may be used. For a pre- means of malting the movement. Typical timed signal or a background-cycle- alternate means are: controlled actuated signal, a left turn vol- ume of more than two vehicles per a. A series of right and/or left tums preach per cycle for a peak hour;, or for a around a block to permit getting to the traffic-actuated signal, 50 or more left desired destination; or turning vehicles per hour in one di~cfion with the product of the turning and con- b. Making the left turn at an adjacent tiering through traffic during the peak unsignalized intersection during gaps hour of 100,000 or more. in the opposing through traffic. ' 4. Miscellaneous. Other factors that might 2. Geometric changes to eliminate the left be considered, include but are not limited turn. An effective change would be a to: impaired sight distance due to complete separation or a complete or horizontai or verticai curvature, or where partiai "clover leal" at grade. Any of there is a large percentage of buses and these, while eliminating left turns, requires trucks. _ additional cost and right of way. 9-01.4 Removal of Existing Signals 3. Provide protected-permissive or permis- sive-protected left turn operation. The Changes in traffic patterns may result in a protected left turn interval may be situation where a traffic signal is no longer prohibited during certain periods of the justified. When this occurs, consideration should day to ailow only permissive intervais for be given to removing the traffic signai and -- left turn movement in order to increase the replacing it with appropriate alternative traffic green time available for other phases, control devices. Refer to Section 9-03.8 for the · requirements of protected-permissive or permissive-protected left turn operation. 9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS CALC DATE DIST CO RTE PM CHK DATE Major St: Critical Approach Speed mph Minor St: Critical Approach Speed mph Critical speed of major street traffic ~ 40 mph .......... [] ~ .... or RURAL (R) In built up area of isolated community of ~ 10,000 pop .......... [] [] URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHOWN ,N SRAOK ulR AP.ROACH LA.t, 20rmo. //I/lllH r Both Apprchs. 500 350 600 420 Major S~eet (400) ~ (280) (480) (336) Highest Apgrch. 150 105 200 140 Mieer Street (120) (84) (160) (112) WARRANT 2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] ~o% ~SATlUI-II=U YE5 [_1 NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS sHowN ,. BRACK ) Ut" APPROACH 1 2 or more ///////Hour LANES Both Apprchs. 750 525 go0 630 Major Street (600) (420) (720) (504) Highest Apprch. 75 53 100 70 Minor Street (60) (421 (80) (56) - WARRANT 3- Minimum Pedestrian Volume 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT FULFILLED Pedestrian volume crossing the major street is 100 or more for each of any four hours or is 190 or more dudng any one Yes [] No [] hour; AND -- There are less than 60 gaps per hour in the major street traf- fic stream of adequate length for pedestrians to cross; AND Yes [] No [] The nearest traffic signal along the major stroet is greater than 300 feet; AND Yes [] No [] The new traffic signal will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow onthe major street. Yes [] No [] The satisfaction of a warrant la not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown, 125 Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-7 Figure 9-2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 4 - School Crossings Not Applicable .......... [] See School Crossings Warrant Sheet [] WARRANT5 - Progressive Movement SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL FULFILLED > 1000 FT. N ft, S ft, E ft, W ft. YES [] NO [] ON ONE WAY ISOLATED STREETS OR STREETS WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE AND ADJACENT SIGNALS ARE SO FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING & SPEED CONTROL WOULD BE LOST ON 2-WAY STREETS WHERE ADJACENT SIGNALS DO NOT PROVIDE NECESSARY PLAT~O'~I~A-N~ - - SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED SIGNALS COULD CONSTITUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM [] [] WARRANT 6- Accident Experience SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENTS WARRANT ~ FULFILLED ONE WARRANT WARRANT 1 - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED 80% WARRANT 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC YES [] NO [] SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW [] [] ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY [] [] ACC. WITHIN A 12 MONTH PERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR & INVOLVING INJURY OR :> $500 DAMAGE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS 5 OR MORE [] [] _ WARRANT 7- Systems Warrant SATISFIED YES [] NO [] MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES ~ i FULFILLED DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VEH/HR 1000 VEH/HR OR DURING EACH OF ANY 5 HRS. OF A SAT. AND/OR SUN. VEH/HR YES [] NO [] CHAR~,CTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR ST. MINOR ST. -- HWY. SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF, ENTERING, OR TRAVERSING A CITY APPEARS AS MAJOR ROUTE OW AN OFFICIAL PLAN ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS MET, BOTH STREETS [] [] ~ The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignmnent must be shown. 126 9-8 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 8- Combination of Warrants SATISFIED YES [] NO [] REQUIREMENT WARRANT ,,/ FULFILLED -- TWO WARRANTS 1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR.VOLUME SATISFIED 80% 2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC YES [] NO [] WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO [] Approach Lanes One e our Both Approaches Maior Street _ ~ Highest Approaches - Minor Street * Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Delay SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; ANID YES [] NO [] 2. _ The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for _ ' one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND YES [] NO [] 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph ~. for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. YES [] NO [] WARRANT 11 - Peak Hour Volume SATISFIED YES [] NO [] 2 or / / / Approach Lanes One more ,/ /' // ,Hour Both Approaches Major Street Highest Approaches - Minor Street * Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown, 127 Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-9 Figure 9-4 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS - (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note) URBAN ......................... RURAL ............................. Minimum Requirements EADT 1. Minimum Vehicular Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on Satisfied Not Satisfied major street (total of higher-volume minor both approaches) street approach (one Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach direction only) Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural 1 ..................... 1 ...................................... 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 2 or more ........................ 1 ...................................... 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 2 or more ........................ 2 or more ......................... 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 ..................................... 2 or more ......................... 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 2. Interuption of Continuous Traffic Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on Satisfied Not Satisfied major street (total of higher-volume minor both approaches) street approach (one direction only) Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach Major Street Minor Street Urbcn Rural Urban Rural 1 ....................... 1 ...................................... 12,000 8,400 1,200 850 2 or more ........................ 1 ...................................... 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 2 or more ........................ 2 or more ......................... 14,400 10,080 1,600 1,120 1 ..................................... 2 or more ......................... 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 3. Combination Satisfied Not Satisfied 2 Warrants 2 Warrants No one warrant satisfied, but following warrants fulfilled 80% or more ......... 1 2 NOTE: To be used only for N~=W INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. 128 9-10 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-5 SCHOOL PROTECTION WARRANTS CALC DATE. DIST CO RTE PM CHK DATE. Major St: Critical Approach Speed mph Minor St: Critical Approach Speed mph Critical speed of major street traffic ~ 40 mph .............. [] orj~. RURAL (R) In built up area of isolated community of < 10,000 pop ........... [] [] URBAN (U) FLASHING YELLOW SCHOOL SIGNALS SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) Minimum Requirements PART A U R / / Each of Vehicle Volume 2 hours 200 140 SATISFIED YES [] NO [] School Age Pedestrian.. Each of 40 40 Crossing Street 2 hours AND PART B Critical Approach Speed Exceeds 35 mph SATISFIED YES [] NO [] AND PART C Is nearest controlled crossing morethan 600 feet away? SATISFIED YES [] NO [] SCHOOL AREA TRAFFIC SIGNALS SATISFIED YES [] NO [] (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) Minimum Requirements PARTA U " / Each of 500 350 Vehicle Volume 2 boM'rs Eachof 100 70 SATISFIED YES [] NO [] School Age Pedestrians 2 hours Crossing Street - - -or- - - ~'........... per day 500 350 AND PART B Is nearest controlled crossing more than 600 feet away? SATISFIED YES [] NO [] 129 Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-11 1-1991 Figure 9-6 FOUR HOUR VOLUME WARRANT (Urban Areas) 500 .,. ~.~ ~-- --:2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) Q. > ,~oo I I I I I I ~2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINOR) I- O ~.. OR 1 LANE (MAJOR) & 2 MORE LANES (MINOR) uJ ~ 300 0 '" 200 ~.~ °> 400 ~~ ~ = ...... ~..~ ~ ~'---- * ~ ~LA.E (MA-'OR) & ~ LA.E (MINOR) aoo 4o0 soo soo 70o 80o ~oo ~ooo .oo ~oo ~aoo ~4oo N(TTE: 115 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 80 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. 130 9-12 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-7 FOUR HOUR VOLUME WARRANT (Rural Areas) ~2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) 300 ~ ~ --2o. MO.E LA. ES(~JO.) ~, LA.E(M..O.) OR 1 LANE (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) 200 100 I ~NE (MAJOR) & 1 ~NE (~NOR) 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BO~ APPROACHES - VPH * NOTE: -' 80 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 60 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-13 Figure 9-8 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT (Urban Areas) ~' 2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) 600 ~.1~ I I I I I I I =. ~- -2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINOR) ~" 500 ~~ '~ ~ OR 1 LANE, MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) ~ ~ 400 ~ '~ I-- ~. -o"' -, ''~ 300 ~,~ ~,~ >O 200 ~ 100 - I ~NE (~JOR) 0I I ~ ~ ~ I 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 ~JOR STREET - TOTAL OF BO~ APPROACHES - VPH NOTE: 150 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. 132 9-14 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual Figure 9-9 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT (Rural Areas) 500 --- -r- --- 2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) , ~ -r ~ ~- 2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINOR) ~ ~ OR 1 LANE (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) ,,, ~O 300 %- ~-Q. ~'UJ O ~ 200 ~ ~ ~ Z--~ - ~ .... I LANE (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINOR) -- o I I I 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH * NOTE: 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. 133 - 10-12 SCHOOL AREA PEDESTRIAN SAFETY Traffic Manual Flashing Yellow Beacons 10-05 -- lO.05.1 Function of Flashing Yellow Beacons "Suggested Route to School"; and Hashing yellow beacons may be installed to 2. At least 40 school pedeslxians use the -. supplement standard school signing and mark- crossing during each of any two hours (not ings for the purpose of providing advance necessarily consecutive) of a normal warning during specified times of operation school day; and when school crossing problems exist (See Figure 10-6). 3 The crossing is at least 600 feet from the If school authorities are to operate the flashing nearest alternate crossing controlled by Yb~llow beacon, an inter-agency agreement should traffic signals, stop signs or crossing - executed to assure designation of a guards;and responsible adult to operate the beacon controls, to provide accessibility for necessary equipment 4. The vehicular volume through the _ maintenance and to fulfill legal liability crossing exceeds 200 vehicles per hour in requirements, urban areas or 140 vehicles per hour in rural areas during the same hours the _ 10.05.2 Warrants for Flashing Yellow Beacons students arc going to and from school for any purpose; and A flashing yellow beacon may be warranted when all of the following conditions are fulfilled: 5. The critical approach speed (85 percentile) exceeds 35 mph or the approach visibility I. The uncontrolled school crossing is on thc is less than thc stopping sight distance. School Crossing Traffic Signals 10-06 10.06.1 Function of School Crossing Traffic considered when meeting thc warrants noted in Signals Chapter 9 of the State Traffic Manual and when either of the following conditions is fulfilled: A traffic signal can effectively assign intersection right-of-way and promote the safe, 1. Urban Areas - 500 vehicles and IIX) orderly movement of both pedestrians arid school pedestrians for each of any two - vehicles. Contrary to popular belief, however, hours (not necessarily consecutive) daily signal control does not always increase safety while students are crossing to or from and reduce delay. Unwarranted, ill-advised school; or signal controls lead to intentional violation, increased ba?ard, unnecessary delay and traffic 500 vehicles for each of any two hours diversion to less desirable alternate routes, daily while students are crossing to or from school and a total of 500 school 10-06.2 Wan'ants for School Crossing Traffic pedestrians during thc entire day. Signals 2. Rural Areas (Use 70 pement of the When it is necessary to extend or create volumes noted under Urban Areas)- 350 adequate crossing gaps in the flow of traffic on vehicles and 70 school pedestrians for the "Suggested Route to School" and no other each of any two hours (not necessarily controlled crossing is located within 600 feet, consecutive) daily while students are School Crossing Traffic Signals should be crossing toorfromschool;or 134 - Traffic Manual SCHOOL AREA PEDESTRIAN SAFETY 10-13 350 vehicles for each of any two hours 2. Pedestrian signal faces of the International (not necessarily consecutive)daily while Symbol type shall be installed at all students are crossing to or from school andmarked crosswalks at signalized minimum total of 350 school pedestrians intersections along the "Suggested Route during the entire day. to School." When critical (85 percentile) approach speed 3. Non-Intersection school pedestrian exceeds 40 mph or the approach visibility is less crosswalk locations may be signalized than the required stopping sight distance, ruralwhen justified by unusual circumstances, warrants should be applied, such as restricted visibility. The design of, and wan'ants for, School Crossing Traffic Signals shall conform to 4. If an intersection is signalized under this Chapter 9 of the State Traffic Manual and guideline for school pedestrians, the entire include the following considerations: intersection shall be signalized. 1. The signals shall be designed for full-time 5. School Ama Traffic Signals shall be traffic operation, actuated type with push buttons or other detectors for pedestrians. Crossing Supervision 10-07 - 10-07.1 Tyl~s of Crossing Supervision Thc following suggested policy for their assignment applies only to crossings serving There arc two types of school crossing elementary school pedestrians on thc "Suggested -- supervision: Route to School". An Adult Crossing Guard should be 1. Adult control of pedestrians and vehiclesconsidered when: . with Adult Crossing Guards or police officers. 1. Special problems exist which make it necessary to assist elementary school 2. Student control of only pedesffians with pedestrians in crossing the street, such as -- School Safety Patrol. at an unusually complicated intersection with frequent turning movements and high Recommended practices for the organization, vehicular speeds; or - operation and administration of Adult Crossing Guards and Student Safety patrols are given in 2. A change in the school crossing location is "SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD PROGRAMS" imminent but prevailing conditions require and "SCHOOL SAFETY PATROL PROGRAM" school crossing supervision for a limited booklets.* Also, see Sections 10-07.10, 11 time and it is infeasible to install another herein, form of control for a temporary period. -- 10-07.2 Adult Crossing Guards 10-07.3 Warrants for Adult Crossing Guards Adult Crossing Guards are a supplemental Adult Crossing Guards normally are assigned technique and not a traffic control device. They where official supervision of elementary school may be assigned at designated school crossingspedestrians is desirable while they cross a public to assist elementary school pedestrians at highway on the"Suggested Route to Sehool", _. specified hours when going to or from school, and at least 40 elementary school pedestrians for (*)Available f~om the Automobile Club of Southern California and the California State Automobile Association (AAA).