Item 22 - Selection of Senior Issues Committee Chairperson
L=TY OF POWA~~
MEMORANDUM
INITIATED BY:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
James L. Bowersox, City Man~
Robert L. Thomas, Director of Community Services .~~
January 27, 1995
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Selection of Senior Issues Committee Chairperson
At the January 23 Senior Issues Committee meeting, the Committee selected
Elaine Jeter as chairperson. The Committee charter stipulates that the
appointment of the chairperson must be sent to the Mayor and City Council for
confirmation.
Confirmation is requested for the appointment of Elaine Jeter as chairperson
of the Senior Issues Committee.
FEB 7 1995
ITEM 224 í
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
James L. Bowersox, City Ma~
John D. Fitch, Assistant City Manager
Reba Wright-Quastler, Director of Planning Services oþ.iJcJ2.
FROM:
INITIATED BY:
DATE:
February 7, 1995
SUBJECT:
Request for Pre-development Conference
On January 5, 1995 Mrs. Paule S. Stern came into the Planning Services Department to
inquire about the feasibility of building a single-family home on the property owned by
the Catholic Diocese at the corner of Tannin Drive and Solera Way. While the old "OS"
zone allowed one dwelling per parcel, the current zoning on the property is OS-R which
does not allow dwelling units. The appropriate means to allow a home on the property
would be to rezone it, probably to RR-A. This would not be an "FF" issue, since a
dwelling unit would have been allowed on the property at the time "FF" was passed.
Because the Pre-General Plan Amendment hearings were scheduled for January 5, it
would not possible to allow Mrs. Stern to participate. Instead, it was suggested that she
request a Pre-development Conference in order to get input from the Council prior to an
application for General Plan Amendment. The formal applications for General Plan
Amendment are due on February 28, 1995.
C:\DA T A\MEMO\STERN.PDC
FEB 7
1995
ITEM
22J} I
RECEIVED
January 26, 1995
,I F, r,;
,'c'" ,
Majorie Wahlsten
City Clerk
City of poway
P.o. Box 789
Poway, CA 92064
CITY OF POWAY
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
Dear Ms. Wah1sten:
In response to my telephone conversation of January 11th
I am requesting a predevelopment conference, as recommended.
I would like to discuss my desire to build a residence.
e call me to set up a meeting time at your convenience.
be reached at 485-5391. I look forward to talking with
FEB 7
1995
ITEM 22.]3 I
PRE-DEVElOPMENT CONFERENCE PROCEDURE
This procedure is provided to enable development proponents to discuss alternative
development concepts with the City prior to submitting development plans.
The attached Agreement of Understanding is filled out and submitted to the City Clerk's office,
accompanied by a letter explaining briefly why this conference is desired, and a map (no larger
than 8Vz" x II') showing the property's location.
The City Clerk will submit your request through the City Manager for City Council consensus
that a conference be held on this property. If consensus is given, conference will be
scheduled at a workshop session and you will be notified of the date. If no consensus, City
Clerk will so notify the proponent.
fEB 7 1995 ITEM 2zj3
AGREEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING
City Council for the City of Po way, hereinafter referred to as .City' and
~d~¿ ;:;t;;.¿, ) , hereinafter referred to as .Proponent" enter into this
Agreement of Understanding based upon the following facts:
Number(s)
Proponent owns or has an equitable interest in land described by tax Assessor's Parcel
;{73- Î'1cJ- {;;L
. Proponent desires to develop this
property in accordance with the will of the City and without the expense of a protracted
development.
City is concerned that Proponent will create development plans unsatisfactory to City
and consume time and effort of City employees needlessly on unsatisfactory development
plans unless City assists in directing Proponent.
Based upon the above-mentioned facts, City will grant Proponent a hearing prior to
filing any application for development upon the following understanding:
b.
c.
d.
a.
City will render no decision with regards to any development proposal or part
thereof.
City will receive no evidence, specific in nature, in support of a particular
development plan.
City will make no representations that will obligate the City to render a decision
in favor of or against any development proposal or part thereof Proponent may
subsequently submit.
If any development proposal is subsequently submitted, Proponent will proceed
at its sole and exclusive risk with the understanding th City has made no
representations upon which Proponent may rei.
Dated: c~J Jaaqé/ f{--
f
Proponent:
Phoxe -
q~s- S 51 I
FEB 7 1995 ITEM 22)3, \