Item 6 - Appeals of Weed Abatement Notice AGI-' DA REPORT SUMI . dtY
TO: Honorable Nayor and Members of the City Council
R g -quas~ , Director of Pla~ng Services
Bob Siebenthaler, Code Compliance Officer~-
Lynn Walker, Code Compliance Officer ~
DATE: April 25, 1995
SUBJECT: Appeals of Weed Abatement Notice
ABSTRACT
Section 8.76.070 of the Poway Municipal Code gives any property owner the right to
appeal the "Notice to Clean Premises," within ten days. Notices were given on April 3,
1995 and at the time of preparing the agenda, no appeals had been received.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental review is not required according to CEQA guidelines.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
None.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council consider any oral appeals presented at the
meeting.
ACTION
E: \C I TY\PLANN ING\REPORT\WEEDABAT. SUM
APR ~5 1995 ITEM 6
lof2
-AGENDA REPOR"
FROM: James L. Bowersox, City Mana~'-'"~''~"~ ^
INITIATED BY: John D. Fitch, Assistant City Manager~
Reba Wright Quastler, Director of PlannYng ~r~i.ces~
~ob Siebenthaler, Code Compliance Officer~,
Lynn Walker, Code Compliance Officer~L~
DATE: April 25, 1995
SUBJECT: Appeals of Weed Abatement Notice
BACKGROUND
Section 8.76.070 of the Poway Municipal Code gives any property owner the
right to appeal the "Notice to Clean Premises", within ten days. Notices were
given on April 3, I995 and at the time of preparing the agenda, no appeals had
been received.
FINDINGS
The practice followed in previous years has been to allow oral appeals at the
meeting, although not specifically called for in the Ordinance.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental review is not required according to CEQA guidelines.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIEICATION AND CORRESPONDENCF
None.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council consider any oral appeals presented at
the meeting.
A_CTION:
APR 2 5 1995 6
2of2