Item 6 - Public Hearing to Consider EA & Proposed Del Poniente Sewer Line Extension Project
AGE1~A REPORT SUMMARY
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James L. Bowersox, City Mana~
INITIATED BY: John D. Fitch, Assistant City Manager
Reba Wright-Quastler, Director of Planning Services
DATE: June 6, 1995
SUBJECT: Public Hearinq to Consider Environmental Assessment and the DroDosed Del
Poniente Sewer Line Extension CaDi tal ImDrovement Project: ADDlicant/Lead
Aqencv: City of Poway
ABSTRACT
The proposed project is the first phase of an eight inch sewer trunk line extension
designed to ultimately replace the existing Del Poniente pump station. Staff has
completed the environmental review documentation for the project.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project required the completion of an extended environmental initi al study,
mitigated negative declaration, and a mitigation monitoring program. In addition, the
approval of "findings" for an interim habitat loss permit for coastal sage scrub impacts
is necessary.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Fiscal Year 1994-95 Financial Program indicates a total estimated project cost of
$602,000.00.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Public notice was published in the Poway News Chieftain and mailed to all owners of
property located within the project alignment corridor and within a 500 foot radius of
such corridor. As of May 19, 1995, no correspondence had been received.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council consider and approve the environmental
assessment documentation and authorize the construction of the project.
ACTION
E:\CITY\PLANNING\REPORT\DELPON.SUM
1 of 31
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6 .. ,-l
~ AGENDA REPOR'l
CITY OF POW A Y
TO:
FROM:
INITIATED BY:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
James L. Bowersox, City Man~
John D. Fitch, Assistant Ci~anager
Reba Wright-Quastler, Director of Planning Services
Jim Nessel, Senior Planner
DATE:
SUBJECT:
June 6, 1995
Public Hearing to Consider Environmental Assessment and the
proposed Del Poniente Sewer Line Extension Capital
Improvement Project: Applicant/Lead Agency: City of Poway
BACKGROUND
The proposed project is the first phase of an eight inch sewer trunk line
extension designed to ultimately replace the existing Del Poniente pump
station. As shown on Attachment 1, this phase involves the construction of
approximately 2,660 linear feet of sewer line beginning at the intersection of
Midland Road and Orange Blossom Lane just north of Twin Peaks Road, extending
on a general northerly alignment, and terminating at the southern boundary of
the approved but undeveloped Huntington Ridge (Unit 3) residential subdivision
located south of Del Poniente Road (See Attachment 1, Project Alignment
Corridor). The final phase of the project along with the elimination of the
existing Del Poniente sewer pump station will occur in conjunction with the
future development of Huntington Gate (Unit 3).
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project required the completion of the attached extended environmental
initial study (Attachment 5), mitigated negative declaration (Attachment 2),
and a mitigation monitoring program (Section I of Attachment 3). In addition,
the approval of "findings" for an interim habitat loss permits for coastal
sage scrub impacts is necessary (NCCP Findings included in Section II of
Attachment 3) Please note that the final initial study document will be
distributed to Council prior to the June 6 public hearing.
The environmental assessment documents have been prepared in accordance with
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the City of Poway
CEQA Implementation Procedures, and the California Natural Communities
Conservation Planning (NCCP) Program Process and Conservation Guidelines.
In accordance with the time limits mandated by State Law (CEQA), a properly
ACTION:
2 of 31
Agenda Report
June 6, 1995
Page 2
advertised and noticed 30-day public review and comment period for the draft
environmental assessment documents began on March 20, 1995 and ended on April
20, 1995. Written comments received during and subsequent to the review period
along with the "responses to comments" are included in Attachment 4.
The environmental documents conclude that the project will not have a
significant effect on the environment (mitigated negative declaration) because
of project revisions and recommended special mitigation measures added to the
project, which mitigate the identified potential significant environmental
effects of the project to a level of less than significant.
The specific project mitigation measures are contained in Section I of
Attachment 3 under the following environmental issue areas:
soils and geology
hydrology
air quality
biological resources
socioeconomics
cultural resources
health and safety
The initial recommended measures for biological impacts have been modified to
address the comment letter from the Department of Fish and Game (See comment
response in Attachment 4).
CORRESPONDENCE
Public notice was published in the Powav News Chieftain and mailed to all
owners of property located within the project alignment corridor and within a
500 foot radius of such corridor. As of May 19, 1995 no correspondence had
been received.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Fiscal Year 1994-95 Financial Program indicates a total estimated project
cost of $602,000.00.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council consider and approve the attached
mitigated negative declaration, mitigation monitoring program, and NCCP
findings, and authorize the construction of the project.
JLB:JDF:RWQ:JN:kls
Attachments:
1. Project Alignment Corridor
2. Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration
3. Mitigation Monitoring Program/NCCP Findings
4. Comment Letters and Responses
5. Extended Environmental Initial Study (Limited Distribution)
3 of 31
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6 ~
f
.
1
i
wZ
....0
z-
w....
-<
z....
000
0..0..
...J::;
w=>
Co..
\
\
\
\
\.-
----
--
~.'
::
<
ZW
a: a:
w<
:1;C)
....z
a:-
0C)
z<
....
00
z<
a:w
Wa:
t;<
WC)
:=z
:1;-
....~
=>....
000
00
....
z
w
::;
W
00
<
w
w
..
C)
Q
00
I
I
I
.1I.~""'"
II
II
II
Ii
Ii
II
II
II
II
'"
~
"
.Z
ti
..
..
'"
>w
a:....
<<
cC)
zz>
=>0....
O....a:
alf@W
z_~ ~
ffi~a: 0
"C
:1;=>0.. ;::
....:1; ~
=>a: 0
00 (.)
C1Ju. "E
OJ
c:
:it
c:;
OJ
0"
~
Q.
E E
OJ OJ
E E
c: c:
.2' .2'
;;( ;;(
~ ~
'" OJ
~ ~
'" "'-
en en5
ell Q) "oC
E -0
C '" iiiQ.
Z '2 "c en
0 o-
W Q. Q.'"
Cl m'C _Cl
w '" c:
....I 0.2 00
c:1:: Eg>
~ 0
~Q. "'.-
~-
- >- 1::C:
::l.... o ::l
0(.) Z~
en-
I .
.
I .
.
I .
.
.
I .
.
.
4 of 31
ATTACHMENT 1
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6
DON HIGGINSON, Mayor
SUSAN CALLERY, Deputy Mayor
BOB EMERY, Councilmembc:r
MICKEY CAFAGNA. Councilmember
BElTY REXFORD, Councilmember
-
CITY OF POWAY
CITY OF POWAY
PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
1. Name and Address of ApplicantjCEQA Lead Agency: City of Poway.
P.O. Box 789. Poway. CA 92064
2. Project Title: Del Poniente Sewer Line Extension Proiect
3. Project Location: City of Poway. County of San Dieao. California - The
subject Droject will beain at the intersection of Midland Road and OranQe
Blossom Lane and extend on a aenera1 northerlY a1ianment for aDDroximatelv
2.660 feet where it will termi nate at the southern boundary of the
aDDroved but undeveloDed HuntinQton RidQe residential subdivision (also
known as Unit 3 of the HuntinQton Gate residential subdivision).
4. Project Description: The Droiect is described as the norther1v extension
of an existina eiaht (8) inch diameter sewer line which Dresent1y
terminates "at a manhole located within the intersection of Midland Road
and Oranae 810ssom Lane. aDDroximatelv 300 feet to the north of Twin Peaks
Road. The new sewer line will be connected to the existina manhole and
will extend a10na a aenera1 northerly a1ianment for a distance of
aDDroximate1Y 2.660 feet and terminate at the southern boundary of the
HuntinQton RidQe residential subdivision.
5. In accordance with Resolution 83-084 of the City of Poway, Procedures to
Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, the City of
Poway has determined that the above project will not have a significant
effect upon the environment. An Extended Initial Study has been prepared
for the subject project. The City of Poway, acting as the CEQA Lead
Agency, has determined that an Envi ronmenta1 Impact Report wi 11 not be
required.
6. Minutes of such decision and the Extended Initial Study prepared by the
City of Poway are on file in the Department of Planning Services of the
City of Poway. .
7. This decision of the City Council of the City of poway is final.
Contact Person: James R. Nessel. Senior Planner
Phone: (619) 679-4256
Approved
by:
Reba Wright-Quast1er, Ph.D., AICP
Director of Planning Services
ATTACHMENT 2
JUN 6 1995 ITEM b
City Hall Located at 13325 Civic Center Drive
P.O. Box 789. Powav. California 9?074-1)789 . (619) 748-6600, 695-1400
Date:
\
5 of 31
ailing Address:
,., Aecyc!ec Paper
FINAL
SECTION I. MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
AND
SECTION II. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL SAGE SCRUB
NATURAL COMMUNITIES CONSERVATION PLANNING (NCCP)
PROGRAM INTERIM HABITAT LOSS PERMIT APPROVAL FINDINGS
PREPARED FOR
PROPOSED DEL PONIENTE SEWER LINE EXTENSION PROJECT
PROJECT APPLICANT/LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF POWAY
PREPARED BY
CITY OF POWAY
PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MAY, 1995
-5 of 31
ATTACHMENT 3
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6 ., I
-.--.---...------'""
----------
----._-..-..---~--
SJ:CTION I.
FINAL MITIGATION KlNITORING PROGRAM
SUBJECT PROJECT: PROPOSED DEL PONIENTE SEWER LINE EXTENSION PROJECT
APPLICANT/LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF POWAY
PURPOSE OF PROGRAM -
This mitigation monitoring program has been prepared in accordance with
Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code. The purpose of this program is
to ensure the implementation, successful completion and effectiveness of
mitigation measures approved by the Lead Agency for the subject "project", as
recommended in the Final Extended Initial Study. This Program will be approved
in connection with the Lead Agency's issuance of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and decision to approve and carry-out the project.
The Extended Initial Study prepared for the project, which is bound under
separate cover, incorporates this Program by reference at the end of Section
1. Executive Summary.
IMPLEMENTATION, MONITORING and REPORTING -
This Program will be incorporated into the project construction specifications
and/or appropriately noted on the project design plans. The Program will be
discussed in detail at a pre-construction meeting conducted by the Lead
Agency. The pre-construction meeting will involve appropriate staff of the
City of Poway, the environmental consultants and construction contractors
under contract with the City, representatives of interested public agencies,
and designated mitigation monitors.
The City of poway Planning Services Department (project planner) and
Engineering Services Department (project engineer and designated project
construction inspector) will be responsible for ensuring that all approved
mitigation measures are accomplished. 'Several recommended mitigation measures
require the expertise of a qualified or certified professional environmental
consultants. These consultants will be under contract with the City and will
provide expert assistance to City staff.
As the CEQA Lead Agency and project applicant, the City will closely
coordinate the completion of mitigation measures with the environmental
consultants, construction contractors, and all affected public agencies,
including identified responsible agencies and trustee agencies from which
permit approvals must be obtained. As mitigation and monitoring requirements
are completed, the City project planner will finalize a reporting form and
distribute the form to affected agencies and parties.
RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES -
The following environmental impact mitigation measures are recommended in the
Final Extended Initial Study, are listed by the same sections contained in the
subject document, and are incorporated into the project design plans and/or
construction specifications. When fully accomplished, these measures will
effectively reduce related impacts to a level of less than significant.
SECTION 4.1
SOILS and GEOLOGY
1. If blasting is required, then blasting of dense boulders and floaters
will be performed in accordance with the City of Poway Blasting Ordinance
Number 258. Measures within the ordinance include notification to residents
within 500 feet from the project corridor of proposed construction activities.
Handling and disposal of oversize material should be performed in accordance
with recommendations of the geotechnical consultant.
7 of 31
2
JUN 6 1995 ITEM b
., \
2. The pipeline will be in conformance with appropriate seismic design
parameters of the Structural Engineering Association of California and
applicable local building codes. Use of flexible pipe joints will be used
where appropriate.
3. Disturbed areas not planned as a sewer maintenance road and staging
areas will be revegetated as soon as construction is completed. Revegetation
will be consistent with the planting recommendations contained under
biological resources (Subsection 4.4).
4. Construction activities resulting in the creation of temporary
stockpiles of exposed slopes should be curtailed during periods of heavy
rainfall to prevent runoff of sediment.
5. The special provisions within the construction specifications for the
project include a section regarding "shoring" of trenches during construction.
Shoring will be installed to allow placement of pipe and to prevent caving
during construction.
SECTION 4.2
HYDROLOGY
1. To minimize shallow groundwater impacts, dewatering measures will be
required to create a dry construction zone. Such measures which will be
covered in the construction specifications for the project would include 1)
controlling the lowered water table through pumping, or 2)discharging of
pumped water to a storm drain in a manner that will. not create overflowing,
flooding, or pollution. Dewatering activities would need to comply with
monitoring and testing methods of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control
Board.
2. Erosion impacts associated with initial site clearing will be minimized
by revegetation of disturbed areas as soon as is feasible after construction
activities. The final erosion control plan will need to identify the location
of haybales, sandbags, and silt barriers where applicable.
3. Potential sedimentation impacts to the adjacent streambed will be
avoided by restricting .seasonal operations near the streambed, covering of
stockpiles, and use of berms, swales, and gravel bags as needed.
4. In the event of heavy rainfall, potential impacts related to spoil
stockpiles will be minimized by using barriers or sandbags to prevent eroded
material from entering the adjacent drainage.
SECTION 4.3
Air Quality
1. Spray all dirt stock-pile areas daily or as needed.
2. Vehicle sReed for all construction vehicles will not exceed 25 mph on
any unpaved surface at the construction site.
3. Trucks hauling material will be properly covered.
4. Open trenches/construction sites should not be left uncovered for more
than 24 hours per day.
5. All vehicles' tires and wheel wells should be water-washed before
leaving the construction site onto adjacent paved road.
8 of 31
3
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6 '.1
.---- .~-~--------~----'---_.
SECTION 4.4
Biological Resources (Floral) (REVrSEDI
NOTE: PLEASJ: UK TIIlI: LJ:AI) AGlCNCDlS RESPONSJ: TO TIIlI: DEPAR~ or rrSH AND GANZ
(COFG) ~ L&T'1'ER DAftD APRIIo 27, 1995, INCLODING TIlE LJ:AI) AGlCNcr
MITIGATION RESOLU'1'ION LET'1'ER DATED MAl' 18, 1995. (SEE ATTACBMEN'J: 5 or 'rHIS
AGENDA IlEPORT)
ADDrTrONAL NOTES:
1. IN ADDrTrON, TIlE crn's MAY 18 LETTER DlD:rcATES A PROPOSED WETLAND BABrTAT
rMPACT MITrGATrON I'EE AS I'OLLOWS:
4. Southern Willow Scrub - $2,280
5. Disturbed rreshwater Marsh - $ 50
Total Wetland r_ -
$2.330
IN RESPONSE TO THE crn' S MA1' 18 LETTER, MR. DAvm I.l'dmEAD or TIIlI: CDrG SAN
DJ:EGO NCCP PROGR.!\M OE'FrCE REQtlESTED ON MAY 21 THAT TIUS '1'O'1'AL :AM:ltlN'r BE
EARMl\RI\ED TO BE USED T01Q1Ul WETLAND MITrGATrON, rr DETEIlMDIED BY TIlE crn TO
FtlRTBER THE rMP1.EMI!:N'1'ATrON or TIlE P01l7.% ~ IlCP. TIlE crn CONCURS WI'rH
THAT REQtlEST.
2. TIlE crn's MAY 18 LETTER ALSO ACIINOllI.EDGES TIlE BrOLOGICAL RESOURCE
TECIlNICAL REPORT IlECa.ea:NDATrON CONCElINING THE SAN DJ:EGO ~RT SENSrT:IVE
PLANT SPECJ:ES. ALSO SEE RESPONSE NO.6 TO COrG c~ LETTER.
1. The loss of coastal sage scrub will be mitigated by onsite revegetation
and/or offsite habitat acquisition and preservation via participation in the
City's poway Subarea HCP. Onsite revegetation would include hydroseeding the
impact area with coastal sage scrub species currently present onsite, and
initiation of a weed abatement plan.
The City's contract registered Landscape Architect will prepare a revegetation
plan to be submitted in conjunction with the interim habitat loss permit for
coastal sage scrub. The City's contract registered Landscape Architect has
proven experience and success with coastal sage scrub revegetation efforts.
Monitoring of the revegetated area should occur for 3 to 5 years to ensure
successful restoration, and should include yearly reports documenting progress
of the restoration effort. Signs informing the public of the sensitive
habitat and its value should be placed at access points along the pipeline
corridor to discourage people from entering the coastal sage scrub. Because
of the small acreage and lower habitat quality of the scrub onsite, coastal
sage scrub revegetation at a 1:1 ratio may be the most appropriate mitigation
option for this project.
-
If onsite-revegetation of impacted scrub is not feasible due to operational
constraints (i.e., creation of a permanent sewer easement/maintenance road),
then acquisition and preservation of offsite habitat at an appropriate
mitigation ratio (1:1 per City policy) and in a configuration that contributes
to a viable regional preserve would be an alternative.
2. The project will require a Streambed Alteration Agreement with the CDFG,
a Section 404 permit(s) from the ACOE, and a 401 water quality certification
from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The project most
likely qualifies for Nationwide permits 12 (Utility Line Backfill and Bedding)
and 33 (Temporary Construction, Access, and Dewatering) .
Application for permits, agreements, and certifications will require
documentation of all expected wetland impacts (e.g., resulting from trenching,
dewatering and/or siltation basins, staging areas, spoils sites, and any other
activities associated with pipeline construction).
9 of 31
4
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6
. \
3. ~ part of the wetland permit process with these resource and regulatory
agencies, a detailed site-specific mitigation and monitoring may be required
for disturbance of wetlands along the northern project alignment. The
mitigation plan would detail all impacts to wetland habitats as a result of
the project and will specify in-kind replacement of habitat quality, as well
as planting specifications, monitoring methodology and frequency, and
reporting procedures.
Typical habitat replacement ratios include 3:1 for southern willow scrub and
1:1 for freshwater marsh. Based on expected.mitigation ratios, a total of
0.081 acre of wetland replacement habitat may be required by the agencies.
4. In addition to the revegetation efforts, a qualified biologist shall be
retained prior to construction to ensure that no additional impacts to
sensitive habitats occur. The biologist shall be onsite when staking and
flagging at the project limits is being conducted by the surveyors. The
biologist shall conduct periodic (monthly) inspections to ensure sensitive
habitats in proximity to project corridor are being avoided by construction
activity.
The City inspector and/or City's biological monitor shall have the authority
to halt construction activities that threaten sensitive biological resources
for which there is no established mitigation plan. Typical habitat replacement
ratios for coastal sage scrub would be 1:1 unless gnatcatchers are detected
onsite during the preconstruction survey. If gnatcatchers are detected the
habitat replacement ratio would be 2:1.
5. The setback for the southwestern staging area shall be no closer than 15
feet from the southern willow scrub habitat. All fueling within this staging
area shall maintain a 25 foot setback from the southern willow scrub.
Compliance with this requirement will be periodically monitored by the project
biologist/City monitor.
6. To address potential secondary impacts related to vehicle incursion
outside of the right-of-way, it is recommended that the easement boundaries be
staked and flagged at 15 foot intervals and these stakes be maintained
throughout the construction.
To address long ter.m access and maintenance impacts, it is recommended that
all maintenance routes be on existing paved roads or on the impacted portion
of the right-of-way and that vehicle access be controlled to eliminate the
potential for an increase in off-road or pedestrian activity.
wildlife Habitat
7. Potentially significant indirect impacts to wildlife habitat may occur
through an increase in pedestrian traffic in the project area that could
result in increased noise levels and trampling of vegetation. These impacts
could be reduced to nonsignificant by the revegetation and signage measures
outlined under vegetation, above.
Sensitive species
8. To reduce adverse impacts to sensitive plant species it is recommended
that the careful construction practices, including flagging and avoiding the
largest stands of plants, are followed. Seed of the affected species (such as
San Diego sagewort) should also be collected onsite prior to construction and
included in appropriate revegetation mixes.
SECTION 4.5
Biological Resources (Fauna)
1. Impacts to potential gnatcatcher habitat can be mitigated to below
levels of significance, through the measures identified under Section 4.4
(Floral) .
10 of 31
5
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6 . ."
-~--_._-_._-~~._----
--....,-
SECTION 4.7
Socioeconomics
1. The City of poway will be required to pay fair market value or equal
consideration as required by law to all property owners whose land is required
for easement purposes related to the proposed project.
Section 4.10
Cultural Resources
The following measures are based on the proposed scope of work for the Del
Poniente Sewer Line Extension Project cultural resources mitigation plan. The
Scope of Work is included in its entirety as Appendix B of the Extended
Initial Study and is fully incorporated herein by reference.
1. Recommendations for the mitigation of direct impacts to CA-SDI-4,606
include the provision that the corridor through the site will be capped with
Class II aggregate base material prior to any construction or trenching. The
capping program must be designed and monitored by an archaeologist. After all
areas of the site within the construction corridor (approximately 20 feet
wide) have been capped, the trench may be excavated. The trench will be no
wider than three feet.
By following this construction progr~. the mitigation of direct impacts can
be limited to the area of the width of the trench along the center line of the
pipeline corridor through the archaeological site. The mitigation of the
direct impacts associated with the trenching through CA-SDI-4606 will include
preparation of a research design, field investigations, laboratory analysis
and a final report. These measures are discussed in detail in Appendix B of
the Extended Initial Study.
2. To address potential secondary impacts related to vehicle incursion
outside of the right-of-way, it is recommended that the easement boundaries
within both CA-SDI-4,606 and CA-SDI-11,144 be staked and flagged at 15 foot
intervals and these stakes be maintained throughout the construction. This is
also a requirement for mitigation of biological resources.
To address long term acce~s and maintenance impacts, it is recommended that
all maintenance routes be on existing paved roads or on the impacted portion
of the right-of-way and that vehicle access be controlled to eliminate the
potential for an increase in off-road or pedestrian activity.
3. To address incremental loss of CA-SDI-4,606 it is recommended that the
data recovery program include the integration of data from previous work at
the site and that a map of the entire site including all previous work be
produced.
To address long term impacts to the regional data base as a whole it is
recommended that the artifacts recovered during the data recovery program and
associated notes be preserved in perpetuity for future research purposes. A
potential location for storing of artifacts is the City of Poway Heritage
Museum. Implementation of the proposed mitigation recommendations will reduce
direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts to a level of insignificance.
SECTION 4.11
Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors (Noise)
1. To avoid potential indirect impacts to the gnatcatcher as a result of
noise construction, the City of Poway will only construct the pipeline
outside of the breeding season (i.e. August 1 through January 15).
2. All residences located within 500 feet of the pipeline alignment will be
notified in writing by the City of poway regarding construction time and
duration at least 72 hours prior to construction in their area.
3. If required, blasting of dense boulders shall be performed in accordance
with the City of poway Blasting Ordinance Number 258.
11 of 31
6
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6
.j
4. The intensity of potential noise sources shall be reduced by the
selection of equipment having the lowest noise emission levels possible.
proper maintenance of~equipment, and fitting of noise generating equipment
with manufactured recommended mufflers.
5. The City of poway shall include a noise limit specification in the
construction contract that the contractor will comply with all provisions of
the City of poway noise ordinance related to construction.
6. All equipment maintenance will be done within the staging area only away
from residences located to the north.
7. Provide enclosures for stationary equipment.
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6 ~",,,\
12 of 31
7
--------"---.. --. - -"~------_..-
-----
SECT:ION :I:I.
1'DllU. sotl'rIIEJlN CAL:II'OJUUA COASTAL SAGII: SCRUB
NA'rtJIUIL CCMoIDN:ITD:S CONSERVAT:ION PLANN:ING (NCCP) PROGRAM
DlTEP.IM 1IA!l:I'rAT LOSS ~T APPROVAL FDlD:INGS
SUBJECT PROJI!:CT: PROPOSED DEL POND:N'rII: Sl!:WEJt LDIl!: EX'l'ENS:ION PROJECT
APPL:ICAN'r/LEAD AGENCY: C:In OF POWA%
NOTE: PLEASE SEE UV:IS:ION NO'rI!lS :IN SECT:ION 4. 4 OF FDllU. NJ:T:IGAT:IOH IClN:ITORJ:NG
PROGRAM AND C:In' S Ml'.r 18 LE=zJl lU!:GARD:ING UVJ:SED CSS LOSS 'l'O'rAL.
The following "Interim Habitat Loss Permit Findings" are recommended by the
City of poway, as Lead Agency and Applicant for the subject "public
improement" project, and will be adopted concurrent with the issuance of a
Mitigated Negative Declaration and the decision to approve and carry-out the
proposed project. The "Findings" will be made in accordance with Sections 4.2
and 4.3 of the approved Southern California Coastal Sage Scrub Natural
Communities Conservation Planning (NCCP) Process Guidelines and Section 3.a.
of the companion NCCP Conservation Guidelines.
The "Findings" are based on the Lead Agency's careful evaluation of the draft
City of poway Subarea Habitat Conservation Plan. The "Findings" are consistent
with the biological resource report, impact analysis, and associated coastal
sage scrub habitat mitigation measures addressed in the project's approved
environmental assessment ("CEQA") documents. These documents include the
related Extended Initial Study and Biological Resources Report (Appendix A),
Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Mitigation Monitoring Program, which are
fully incorporated herein by reference. The "Findings" are also consistent
with the City's General Plan, Redevelopment Plan, and Capital Improvement
Program.
The required "Findings" for approval of the Interim Habitat Loss Permit can be
made and are as follows:
1. The proposed habitat lost is consistent with the interim loss criteria
in the Conservation Guidelines in that 7056 total acres of CSS have been
inventoried as existing in the City of Poway. The initial 5% allowable
habitat loss figure is 352.8 acres. To date 2.42 acres have been
approved from the 5% habitat loss account, therefore, the remaining
balance in the 5% allowable habitat loss account is currently 350.38
acres.
(lU!:VlSED)
The proposed project will impact 0.227 acres of low quality CSS habitat,
0.315 acres o~ baccharis scrub, and 0.141 acres of disturbed CSS
habitat, for a total impact of 0.368 acres (Revised to~ _ 0.684
acres). With the approval of the interim habitat loss permit for the
subject project, a balance of 350.01 acres (Revised ~ance - 349.70
acres) would remain in the City's CSS habitat loss account.
2. The proposed habitat loss does not preclude connectivity between areas
of high habitat values. The northern portion of the project is within
Proposed Resource Protection Area (PRPA) No.9, as identified on the GIS
FPA Vegetation and Preserve Design colored maps of the Draft poway
Subarea Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). Table 5-3 of the Draft poway
HCP ranks this PRPA as "medium" for acquisition priority, preservation
value, and risk.
3. The loss of the 0.42/0.684 acres of CSS to development does not
cumulatively exceed the five percent interim take guideline, as
discussed in item 1. above.
_ 3 of 31
8
- JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6
4. The habitat loss will not preclude or prevent the preparation of the
poway Subarea Plan, or ultimately a sub-regional NCCP such as the
MSCP/MHCP because of the negligible impact of the proposed project on
CSS habitat and other sensitive habitats affected by the project.
The area in the vicinity of the proposed project is within the Focused
Planning Area of the poway HCP. Several parcels are developed with homes
and the future developed of the remaining undeveloped rural residential
land in the area would be affected by the provisions of the final
approved poway Subarea HCP and other applicable requirements. In an
effort to minimize impacts to higher qUality CSS habitat, the project
has been designed so that impacts will be limited to low quality and
disturbed CSS habitat. Based on the most current Gnatcatcher (CAGN)
surveys conducted for the project, no CAGN species have been sited
within the project impact corridor. As shown in Table 4-1 of the
Extended Initial Study (Table 1 of the Biolobical Resources Report),
0.147 acres of the total 0.368/0.684 acres of CSS habitat disturbed is
considered a temporary impact subject to the recommended mitigation
measures consisting of on-site revegetation and monitoring, and/or off-
site acquisition.
5. The habitat loss has been minimized and mitigated to the maximum extent
practicable in accordance with Section 4.3, as stated in #4 above and
discussed in greater detail in Sections 4.4 and 4.5 of the Extended
Initial Study.
6. That habitat loss will not appreciably reduce the likelihQod of the
survival and recovery of listed species in the wild because the majority
of the on-site CSS will remain undisturbed through the completion of
recommended mitigation measures for the project and the implementation
of the poway Subarea Habitat Conservation Plan.
7. The habitat loss is incidental to otherwise lawful activities in that
the subject habitat loss would not occur until necessary state and local
approvals are obtained.
14 of 31
9
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PETE WILSON. Governor
GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH
1400 TENTH STREET
~GRAMENTO, CA 95814
&
.
April 20, 1995
JIM NESSEL
CITY OF POWAY
13325 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
BLDG. A
l'OWAY, CA 92064
Subject: DEL PONIENTE SEWER LINE EXTENSION SCH #: 95031046
Dear JIM NESSEL:
The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named environmental
document to selected state agencies for review. The review period
is closed and none of the state agencies have comments. This
letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State
Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental
documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act..'
Please call Mark Goss at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions
regarding the environmental review process. When contacting the
Clearinghouse in this matter, please use the eight-digit State
Clearinghouse number so that we may respond promptly.
Michael Chiriatti, r.
Chief, State Clearinghouse
STAFF NOTE:
NO RESPONSE BY LEAD AGENCY NECESSARY
R6SfolJse itJ CotnlYle.rr.s
15 of 31
A TT ACHMENT 4
JUN 6 1995 1TEM 6 ::: ill
--.:~~: ::."-:-'" ~.::^
TO:
SEP 6. 1'30'3 5:35PM t'.......4 p.a2
Notice of Completion S'2!1,k Ita,.y D"c:u"ulIt M -i-;Ho~"f- n d.-~l
MiJ,llO' Stal( Ckannshoo~, 14()() Tenth Slr('(l, S.cnnk'.nlO, C^ 9581. 9J6/..S-0613 SCH, 95 0 3 ~
P"'/K' nu.: J'Eo.eas~.2i;"1.- 9..Q.w;:l,[n=;-_..~wG1Z...LlNcr-EJ(:c..
j....dA,""", -_....t:.J.:r.~.RJ.JAi-______ _ _ c.."."P~, :rIM IJ"'~ _
S."''''''''."'-U.3z.s-....w,,,G UsbLUiQ.ll.ll.-.,.l!.I..PIaA. ""'- {"q)t..~.=A- .r;.t-74....e
~"'- -=-~='O_~A.f._ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~~.~"l::: ~ __ _~:::. =~~~~.~ __..:. __ _ __
ProJ.ect Loc:::..Uon
CounlY:.-5A.u._.D..ta,O_ Ci{)'IN~"e&l CommunilY: Ctr'f r.c <au (")1F:"J.n
en,,,s..,,, ...1'yJw_PE"<'~_.Rn/_MlDU.6U:LH.c._ 7,.C.... s.zl164- T""'....... I. e 7 ,H
A.nuloClr"PII('cINa fi=..AbL~~c..~4:=l Seaton: 1.. Twp. 1""'1+:5" Ranae;..2~ nuc;CA.,,,,..
w.1hin 2 Miln. 5"10: Hwy II: __"'./4_ ____ ._.__ W.W:r...ays. _ ~1!tJj.."suA-):"G:'" .alieL:fi.,~' /T"4Dy _ .:5~.:. _
A,'PO"'- _____J'll..____ __ ..i1w.,,, -&fA. S.-looo., ~..&I!I;:~IfU;1!llL,rrB~1
__h ___ _._ ___ .___ _________ ____________~~.!2e.L€"_____
Document Type
J Ru.uM 0 NvlUlbon
I'ra.onc a Kedr..cloprnCl'lI
Use Perm. 0 eo"",) Pami!
Land Ui"'isioft (Subdlvi"ion. oomer (Ary l.AP...JI.A1....
1'llIeeIMap,Tr.aMal"t<c.) 1~~oVe:trt~ ('~
----------------~---
Ptt>N
__MCt>_
ceo...:
ONor
o r....ly COM
gg"'et:.~c
o Dull ErR
o S"M'lemaur.;\IUsc.ql,l("nl NEPA:
o EIR (rt;Of sell No.)____
DO"",,
o NOI Other:
oEA
OlJrarlEJS
OH)NSI
LOCI.' ActlCNI Typ-
O ~rw,aJ rlan Urda1e
o Go:rw,.J f'1an AmendJ'llClll
o Gene,.J PIGl Elc:mrnt
o Communiry Pian
OS,
OMa
01'1
OSil
o...IOf)mtInt Ty"
[J Ruidlt'nt.iaJ: UNsS A~rU
oO!roec: 5q/l.- A.CTt'.J- f-rJD'US
OConunen:,i&!- Sqp.- A,'r<\- 1~"IQJus~
01ndu~trial: Sq/l.== M'''S~ E",,.I",~u---:---
o Educlti('OtU!
OR.C'Cfulional
o Jow 00c:whal.1
DPinal Documeru
OOthfl"
o WII/I:t FaciUlte5: T~
o Tr.mpM\&tion: "'-
nMinina: Mj~GJ
o Power: Tip<. - "--,V,;,,-'
OW"~"fc.aVGc:1lt "(Ie ----- -
o lIu..llO;rus WUIoC:: Type
0O<h<r...1-~;-p. ..,n' r.7iM.1~-';;'t:R.._
- - - - __ _._ __. _ ___ _._ _______ ___.__ _J.P.F~S~cl..1:.'!!S
p,.o~~t I..u.. Olacu...d In Oocurn.nt
8 ArS\helkA'jlual
o AlrieulwrallAnct
8' Ai, Qullity
gArdleOlor;ic.allHiSllXKtJ.
o Coul&! Zont
II" OrIiNlr;e1A.biorp.ion
.. Ecoroomi<JJow
OFisctJ.
o Flvco.1Pllil\lFlnl:w1in.c
o r'Ot'Ul Und/I:ire H".ald
Qg~lor;i('ISC'.i$lllic
iO~:~.
Popul'tion/lkou$lnt R.lln('c
[\,blic: St.rw"u/F~ilitic:s
RM"c.atiof\lT'flU
o SchooWt/nivmilic:s
QgSC'plK.S)'Jo&Cms
8l5cwCf" CI,*=-it)'
fil$oij&o.~radinc
o Solid Walle'
DT(la.iclHuarci<tus
~T,aCf.c:JCiInIl&lioa
)IlVtr;~lation
ID WIll:' QutJ.ity
iW''''Suppl'''''''''''''''''''
WeilandlRirwian
WiWll(e
Growth IndUelll"
Lanclult.
Curnulu;w E!ffrc/,l
0""'"
;~:~ ~-':-IZ:';I;;:::-,,~p~n~;~ (~;-~;; 4-') f;;;a7.;Z ~~,.,~ (PP)-.R~~~.
S'>J<;L"- f;>.r''',-y ~ (RS-z.).....J ~u__ ~51"""n"""" (. (f!R-c.\ )
- - - - - - - - - - ---~_ _ _ ___ _~____l.:,:.:_L___________ __
CLEARINGHOUSE CONTACT: Mark Go..
(916) ....S-0613
srATE REV'... "GA,,, ~_;;11 __ "15"
DEPT REV TO ACENCYI 2- I":)
AGENCY REV TO SeN ..:i. - I 8
SCH COKPLIANCE L( _ ;;0
95u310'Uj
atT "'"'
--- -~~.
---'- _Boatinq
___ ___Coa.tal cc..
_ ___Coa.tal COn.y
___ ___COlerado RYr ad
~ con..rvatiens:
_'bh " c...___
_ _per..try
~Park. , R~/ORP
___ ___Reclamation
_ _BCDC
_ _DWR
P"".- JICJ'PR SCR IIOKII-. 011' ALL ~s
... "h'an~ Bou.
___ _Aeronautic.
_ _alP I
__Cd'ran. I }
___ _Tran. Pl&M~
!!!!!!I!!.-Rou.ioq , 0...1
_ ~t.III c ..ltAnl
_._Dr1nkin9"820 --:--:"'
___ _Medical Wa.t.
pr...o:w: J"OItVaRn LAn ~bu'llS DIUCTLY
'TO TB:I: T Ran ACmIl!r alLY
AOKD/UOJI2L (a..cure..: '3/ 25'1
--
16 of 31
lead
-.- . .~nt bv SCH\
atT """
.t.t./~r a9C.
___ _General S.rYic..
___ _OLA (Schooh)
Cal/Ua
~AR.
_ _CA Wa.t. Mgat Bel
___ ___SWRCBI--Granta
___ _SWRCBI--Delt..
___ ___SVRCBI--wtr Quality
___ ___SWRC8:--Wtr Right.
-_. WQC8#~
_ _DTSC/CTC
1'th/A4lt Oo.rrect.iODll
___ ___Correction.
Iadepe_' <:<.0
..... '...qy eo-
___ _HAIIC
_ _POC
___ ___S.nta Mn Ktn.
~St..t. Land. ec-:
___ _Tahoe R91 Plan
___ _Other:
JUN 6
1995
,-
ITEM 6
_i l
g'B.8-8~]g'08~
= J 'i.!:: 'g j ~ :
19'iJ;~~t;R
'=.x~l'l!jB8els
-.~v_"'. "u
~--~.1'2eD.~
~l~i~~-6l~:-
~;..:;:-a"'l.!!'-.
"g'5-1J~,,;a5~..
~ ~ 5 ! Q = g ! ~ 5
i:!'Q..l;!.x!i
.;1; c::.- ~ _ ... _ .
:5 '. -5 -R: l;. ,.. -' ... Jl ...
""u:l!.e,,;'~.,'_!l
O~iJ~8!!b O!:i
~ a u ~ ~ 5 ~ e ~
~."..=J"OEM.ee
~!!g)$._~~.:\i8
.!]~l~~'~"i.xl'
-B:;:..!=",~~
... Q,CS"'-uuu ';
Q j e -; > i! ~
~ :ee~'iE-';~
~iQe...e..e"5u
u'"f.2J'i.~~i~11
:-Ci c:Llit5 = g 1
Co. ~ "i ~ (J ; lit ~ ,:..r
C<1Ii '-":aoUQo
Oc;=fai E~'= g e-a:
tf.!~s.!~Me;~-
l-i~~ga~~!-;I
~].ill ui:l! !l.5e 1I
~!'i:=ile~~,:Iooo"
.. '0 'i. == 'il iJ roo I Ql'"
<1~5P*{-u~
"':~~~~EQ.g-:5~
.!'. "ll
... i'i .
fi~~~
'!]2Si
.8~~~
'i 'll - e
-..cf..8
5. '" i ..!!
l:-s;
:;; :: =- ~
v .. .;.
· ;; ! il
!l It.
.a i ; .s
ol-e~
116~:!t::
~ ! · l'o
1$ -= 'B ...
l:';';.8
~ ~ ~ 1
1-.... .. l!
J! I:; t
1;l_'51t
; ~ i n
:;.:i:e=';
>> zt'g I."
-ocfc
!tiil
N52.5[
QIE-CO Co
~ V+
~ ;..
., ~
~.::.. ~ ~..
~ . ~
("l '"
-s. ,
~ (,
~O ..0
lOCI C......
San Diego County Archaeological Society
Environmental Review Committee
April 17, 1995
To:
Mr. Jim Nessel, Senior Planner
Planning Services Department
City of Poway
13325 Civic Center Drive, Building A
Poway, California 92064
Subject:
Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration
Del Poniente Sewer Line Extension Project
Dear Mr. Nessel:
. I have reviewed the cultqral resources aspects of the subject PMND on
behalf of this committee of the San Diego County Archaeological Society.
Based on the contents of the PMND and the cultural resources report for
the project, we concur in the impact analysis and mitigation measures proposed,
with the following exceptions:
(1) The capping in way of archaeological site SDI-4606 is a good approach,
since it also provides mitigation for future access along the pipeline route.
However, this would then preclude the use if plywood sheets or steel plates, as
mentioned on page 4-35, since they would seem to not be compatible with a
permanent access route.
(2) We presume that the trenching through the cap will be monitored by a
qualified archaeological monitor, and that the results will be included in the
project archaeologist's final report.
Thank you for providing SDCAS with this opportunity to review and comment
upon this proposed project's environmental studies.
Sincerely,
~~~1~~
Environmental Review Committee
cc: Ogden Environmental and Energy Services
SDCAS President
file
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6 . r1
18 of 31
po. Box 81106 Son Diego. CA 92138-1106 (619) 538-0935
OGDEN
ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY SERVICES
.....
5510 Morehouse Drive
San Diego, CA 92121
6194589044
Fax6194580943
95-152-3152
May 12, 1995
Mr. James W. Royle, Jr., Chairperson
San Diego County Archaeological Society
Envirorunental Review Committee
P.O. Box 81106
San Diego, California 92138-1106
Subject: Re5pvn3~ tv Ciiiiiment fo. th.e Del Ponient: Sc\.,:::r L:iiC E;.::tcr.s;or.- F:nal
Extended Environmental Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Dear Mr. Royle:
The City of Poway distributed the Draft Extended Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative
Declaration, and Mitigation Monitoring Program for public review from March 20, through April 20,
1995. The City received a written comment from you on behalf of the San Diego County
Archaeological Society (SDCAS). The following is in response to your comment letter dated April 17 ,
1995.
1. As discussed on page 4-34 of the Extended Initial Study, direct impacts to archaeological site
CA-SDI-4,606 will be limited to the width of the trench to be excavated for the pipe. The
limitation of impacts to the width of the pipeline trench will be accomplished through the
placement of a protective capping material over the 20-foot wide sewer line easement Capping
material will be comprised of Class IT aggregate base material made of a mixture of gravel. rock
and sand. The use of plywood sheet or steel plates would be used as an .alternative capping
material, if necessary, during construction only. These alternative capping materials, if used,
would be removed upon completion of the sewer line construction. Once the construction of
the sewer line is completed, a 12-foot width of Class IT capping material will be compacted and
remain in place to serve as a permanent access for maintenance purposes.
2. It is true that capping: activity associated with trenching of the sewer alignment will be
monitored by an archaeologist, as stated in Mitigation Measure #1, page 4-36 of the initial
study. Mitigation of direcf impacts associated with the trench!ng through CA-SDI-4606 will
include preparation of a research design, field investigations, laboratory analysis and
preparation of a final repon.
The City of Poway will hold a Public Hearing in the City Council Chambers, 13325 Civic
Center Drive, Poway, on Tuesday, June 6 1995 at 7:00 p.m. If you have any additional question
please contact Jim Nessel, at the City of Poway (619) 679-4256.
SiJ!cere1y, ~
t~[;'n .'
Project Manager
ITG/sdh
cc: ""~~~tt:orp of Engineers
Contract #3-1395-1000-1010-3151
19 of 31
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6
,I
@
i1~
t~ . " n
; ~$'
~.
,
~~
...-
N
~
~
"
0.
C
'"
~
<
t:>
0
. Z
<
~
~ :::
on
ii:
. . ...
- ~ i; ~
. ~ -:J ...
,
Z. ..
w S... O'
20 of 31
...
'"
'"
..
,..
~..
"'"
CO'
"
..
... ......
. c c
. ."
It >OU 0
.. ..
=S~::
:.!;~
'''U
. 0 ....
., >o:G ~
.Ml"'l :s::
..._1Pt 0
zu... .
",'J
..
'"
'"
...
"'
...
.
.
.
.
"
...
.g
.......
"'0
"..
".....
tSc:;
00
....."
....
c c 0
~:r
..illS
.
.... c
...c.
........
c...
~"'..;
'" ..
....
~cX;:;
. "
..."
......
.. c
."
....."
..c..
.0
".
c
...
&
"
::
"
.
.
C
. ..
'" .IJ u".
w CI~" uo ....
U ctfl~ t.;t_.w_ c
c: .c:4.... ~l'lIO C1UO
. ......c c:....~ \of ........e
wll Q,I!:COJ a.)oo....~c:
C1.1:~ o.c:"" ellS" ...
~~.. ~ ;..~~.... g'tZJ 6. g:
~~ .ct~.=,,2::~g'''60~~;
.2:::5i~~'Ose::::.t; 8i
000 ......=a..:~ .c
"f'(,Q ..........1: 0 :lI 0)0,0 ..
.c.:;,Oou....'t\ICl=....u~.""
o . CoC .............
Z!:g~~~~~....:~Ua&:
c:....... .......... II .......,,U <<II. .
" IttJ;z _ClO .=C:UCf
1!'t2....c .'0> s:o...... ....
...,u...."O~-.GOt1! "'..~
~ J~~z:.w =1: a &.-0 cf
0..... OtCt ......'02.... 2. W'""
&:2 ..sc:; 0;.... o.z g'a.3 g;
-w~:zg8oAl~~~~. ..
.fl~~"".~C QCfll...O~~
1'= o~;t. ~~~ ~:=:-;: a'O.w~
o....i~~~ ~.,....r04c.;g2
-a "'.....-ttX!W."'C:llS
eN" ~1lI1l"a..e:t.w~8.
~l'lIOlll.a. .~~u .....w ~
.. g,aCJlOIll ."C:'" M
,Q.u a.......... c:.... Ouo.
_f.'aClQ, ....CDJ.., uc: 8
=~....~)4:;:.""8Z..D.~
OOO"MOt71 .... ..DC:"C
"4~o6oI>~".c"'."'g""""..
oc...5:~.s~o>o;G.':.2
IJ.~ . O>-....c:)4.... 0
c~.."",..~.. ...ouo "'..
.4JJJu"".c......o_tdoc... J(
. ....... OOOU;l.OO .....
MI:~"">"''''' a"i4,U...!-
::::~2C!Jgi....uS:"8~ ·
a.~ Goo-,,", ...dS..o ..,,...::
~~~ 0- ~G~.~""I~~M
.. el""..... ..w c:..... .-'''CII4.
c"'l.c.~...>>"x. D,
... ~... 0 w.Q~""'" O"CI..
.. ....""u.......o~..wc""
I c:.... .u~.>A.a.:r..
:og ~f.5~.s ~::~;:;:.8 IS
...
III 0 U e
.a1 ...... .I: >
" fJ.... .,....
.38 ""Z~ GC:~
... 0 QoQ, t1\....1II
.. NO.... .":C
t;i~~.iJ..~:a
!."B.Ot'OO.:I!.::
.::1 t.l ..", 4l0lM. U
~., <1..0........,.-4" k ..;:I
.. ='" III "" Uo4J t.l
C.. ~tJO 0.....4ol
...."'~U,ot.l"OU 0-
too......c.... ..:;;;:
041...0 =.u ~...o U 0
....O..""'oooa.u
:r 0.... I) G:I . lI#
..., ........ O'l vo tit,..
e~.=.2'Oio.~.,..OA
.." u... t.l c.... 0'1'0
.,; ...UOO.... ...
....-.., '""............,
~.I.'O.'OIIl..,..QO
- kC...."'..
. ......U 11IO_ ._ t:: Q"
000. 011(4.
...,., .., k 001-
U ......,1o?i0"4...
..o;tw,o..... 0 0.1 >-
O'ei ~~-=.... ~....:j
..u. 0...... 0
a.. ...., "" 0 .. at"
..";;;~1-3.....8=;:
,J: "'... "II c:.... O...""OU
....=00 ..~'8z::~.
... .""CI,J:.. ." o.JiJ
O~"',QC: 0_"'0.
.u:s.o .a4::1~
g-=:.b~i',..."c:.-;
....41....0........MwD
~gg ic.... .g'
.. .! c Soli .. .
c"oo....... ...... k.
I ";In"".........
. .~~e.~ -:: 8'S';
ab e c:...';..:-1.:..::
~.X~3 C:AS.~
,.. .1::1.. ...0.....61 >
,......,...'l:I.~.c:...
NOtg ....wa.e.&.l
e:.~::~'ia~Q.~
c
.;
...
.
>
"
.
.
.
"
0.
~
.
....
. .
.M
0_
0'"
.
.....
o
~
. .
"~ .
U.-" ....'0
III c:.... ~
...
'eo,U ,
~ &5 6
.- ...
o ...
...",...
C:l::S ..
....w~....
uoc
".=:0"
.. ...0
O. .
.....,
0."'.......
. III ~ 1Il
.....c:i....
..8 D
011II-'"
....,Q....c
.
~"".s:: .
oou....
. .....
"".11I.
U.s.l.
- .11"'"
... cO
...'"
.- "
... _ 0
.. .--
1-51
f1~-
-:: 6
.......
CL~U-';
.0.""
1IC a.c 0
....'"
. .
:siN 5
""'1lo-l1~~.II"'('"\).lT^".n "1~~ ~t7~QT c.:c., .:.r .lHJ
1995
ITEM e
~
~
w
....
.O'
.O'
.-
::~.. 0
:"~
....-
~!.
21
of 31
e
e~
o
~..,
._ u~
-Ill 0.=
0.., 0 ,,_
UM. ~..
= 11I-1 e IolN
-0 0
Ll 0_.. lIS
c: .....,,.,,
4&l.utOCltO
....= III ~> lEt
""., w..... W lot
u ~.
C:1w__ .
00" E .u
- .... c: tI .
.., >- at 0 G'C
I'll"" lIS..., ...t.....a
>-1 "... 0...,
lol......~(,)wc:
G IQ II i.I ~ ~It
,,~ o.w E
c: O'C OM It 41
o 0101".....
tJ"'....o.C..a,
W.., ""0 .
.u:JtlflIOc;..
"0" "...4
""-4 1t4J "'.e .
.... t1Il1JQ,,,,,..c
~~~i-.-;",
=10&1 ... ...
... CI tt ~
IG If J:;.. lot 0
4IQI "4oIf0411;1
104..,,, &lor:
.8:~.8~~~
= lJ. :r....
~. OOC)llII
,."..... g.u=~...
... :loo C,,",
> i4-J.. . Ole
o .,-C" .,
"" ""(J.......
.. U'O"
...J.gJlc:~
>-"'~JJ. 0....
.u --Co
....-..~ ~ .,tit
U o,"'!' 2"
.eu..........,
.c.. "'.e.e..
":I O"41"O.JJ
lllIG;r ..
. U DlO lot a.c::l
. It 19,1; o.c "
m........,~
.. '0
- c: II """ ...
~=~:g t 5o~ ~ ~
:uQ,!~ ..38.:11-" 'gC),.,,~
... 1I.u &I U.c::I 1lI..w. III .. O'l
"~C:Io4C="wc=o...... .."
G.2~~t:"",,~~~~gg.uw
~a._C:.~.~>W-1 -c~w.
~_.u....o M~ l.l.c::l".u_,,_
o to.... u. c: .. 0 ........... Qo.c
"',C.c:a CJla c: ...., u.c ., II II
c... eGO."'. ~..c.._
;;; ",..,t;- "J:.c~.., Ii f: g.~.g ~
WC..~.... .u~~-"UU.u""llII
D-..uCl.Iot_~."o.."",.
.C~.......u~a... .1010
0- .l:.Mflg .uQ, ec: .u
.....(1..... ..c:.......(r'IUC_
'Ou "Jo iO~Q.DI.~....
~8~~~v~.:~.:_M._:
.vcl.~~i~:!~~:.Q.j
~.o..~ WCl .~M~~~
.-....o,Q otJt..,.....,,=.....w
~ ~. ~ M.>c.....i u
u 4~0.....>_040.. ~c
~~...aM....M_OO~ .0
-~~. W~WN....O M ~~
~t~~=~4~.~. ~"~gM
~....~.... C~~.Mr~a~~4
~ .~.O~M"C....OO...~~
o.~w _.... ....W4 ~o~
;ttJIc::.tlto"".~.o.Q,"""'.o
."....c......O.cC.M.lIl:; c:
5" ..~-:...,~~.Mlti-811.!S
~M.~O.~~,,~. ~"'M +I
.....~.....M._.O.~0~...~4
.~...~.......~ W 0 ..~~
"".'g.o..S'uca C"l~:l
~Z gt:..: w ~ w:: · "'oS l~ r.!'
.V" ...~"".""oo ~
:.~~~!Zi.~.~.s~~xi
"~!R.~~ =.~O& o.~3
.uo~e"'03 ~~&ooaloo
.......~ 00 ...... >=00 ~
...:. --"O'I.C: "'l..~".e.
, ~h~ 5~:rA~k.~~"'.
cl""~MJw.~~.k.".. ,~
o....c~.....O~.&~DM~~...h...
ueuOl M I I.......... U.
.~ .~..... 0 .........
O'.......,c:t> .... 1...1.#....
.=.1:....0.... c......c.......Ow
....O~~~c~~~.~o~~.~~
4J. . II
C e ...-.1 ..
4J,.. Q40I ~ N
Ewe W<<l ~ . .
CI 0 k...... ft .I:.
U J.l u.... eo", ftJ.l
4l1.c: 'tIA 0,.,.1:.... C c:
..-.I....uOu.G ~A....u....aos
a.==........c: " .(r'I.c....O
- CI'IO U . "'''OIIW_<<I.,,,,,,,
W..MQ~~O ~.OOM .~
W uQ,OLlC .4J w,,~...
-'WON 0 ~WO"~ o.~
G.O..~~~c~=c ~ ~.
UO,",Q. MlWfI-..4 .,,0....0.
..... w . ".... _.c... 0 c:....c:" O'l ...
~8~-.~cu~~8t~~1:~ .
~.M~O.O.~. ~o. ~N~
tl' o...:s....ww lllQo...,'w.... "
.....~IW...,G'....=::I~CWl .c:......"'"
~.~~~.~~~~~~~~~~:~
=~ · .c:..oo.... -00 ..
~~4._M~ 3e_.. N_~
en,..: 8,;: c :.8~.u ~~~ .Ji~,Q
....~.o vv ..~~~~~1.~
~~. k.. ~ ..1::.... o~~....... N t;
....C1... oUcnvc:.a8'",o t.40=~.
........... .c:......-c:I!~owcro
1:1_., "'.I:. -'M.":; 0-0_", 1l4"" M O:J
M:S"...,., ~ -0. 00
cr;, eo.,...oOtolt.Jl!:" ....
.u..c:.'O...........:. ......,u. .'0....
~....o.u ......-~4".M~_
4 .........c:e.MJ:,""O...,,Q.....~>
W~W.,....C10,Q.....~ _....~ ....
g~...:~::~: ~~~:~~ e
....... ... .....r<If'" '.g"A .4..
~~OO ~'O~.. ec.e.c
~~"'C.k~O V~!.~. N~
c:~-....2.a.8~~.~..,~i.g
... .~..........c.... .... 4J.. ""'.
~--t........"".. tI ........" o.
~c ~ D ....~_..,.".......
WOG. -I' g'o...."e...ll".....
~:! -::... ....t~"'2.:~...o:.u
"w- ...,10. e. ~O_.~
U'g~~8MA~g~t~~o=.o
=,,-".~x --De co_!
'O~wi...St1!!~ &~oeB~
" · ~._....o ~M~O~N .
-C..-ace.... "''''0.':
0004...G...,.. ._....~~_..
..C"_ ~~... ~~~_M~.
-:: &:::~.! 0 =; g ~ e ~ ~ i 8:::~
"":J ......,.., 0". u.....a.o u 5".0
o
",..
.'"
.c
~
.....
.0
..,...
"...
3.!:i
u
W
0""
..u
..W
..,"
u.
. .~
Co.
....
-~
u
..w
0,,"
-.
~..,
.. e
...
....
"'"
.w
u.
a...
n
o
..
:;.1
I-
"'1
I.
W_
g..
wI
t: ";'
e
JOO 6
1995
ITEM
6
~ ~~
..I~-e:_.g
-= -= .-.! s: 't:l
.$~ i.:a.l5:S.~
-s~gi:_j].;
."E!"~vJO
::8.2~]'1.:l.~
l~~:::~. t
c.~G~'!15ii&
.BB~g~~;
::e.e-z"'<,.:-
~.i~~~~g,!
v~.w-(.;..~~.~
:Jl>-:g.;~:;~g
:u~"i.:~~
~ It!~'';l-'''O~U
..8.fe.!~..J:Io
tn-5 ul~~~i!
!!oU,~.~~;r:t:
] <' oS ~ tt '0 liS ti. ~
, ~ ~ . ~ n ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 1M" fJ t . :;, ...
~j~1lI~~H~
~ <, i ~ ~ ~
Irs; cl-s-::
d!~'!r;~Ji
."i~~g-]~"O-
;!~~1~~8J
(,I"c.~g&.a..uu.i!
s~..='E.s;~t!
~,t"iltisc\d>..::J
.=.i.-~"';"'H
f"'i~~I~"i'O~a
\
r<1
...
.
...,
.'"
.'"
=-
. '"
.='" ..
....... I: .... "
o ::I .. C~
"'OG 0 0=
"" 0 .. U .. ..... ".... w
x ....... ......... 0
.8~~-8~,Q..v~~~::
..ClotoCt'I_"l:J..c:..cu.c___
Q..,.jAo<<f.l:....<ioI~IOU.u.
"UJ:o.G::I O'O....u
:G~-'a.,.g~.:~J..
'"'~ o. tI,I.l":' _.c
"1;1"");" It 10 .... C"'",."
'tI """"0 ~(,).,Oc.u
10 C C Qot'l /II ""1M III Oltl
.... ~ o...c. ... t:
o -f tJ'w "",. 0_ .
.u~:-=Pf~"g~:l.~
_OIll=."'C_.....at:2
~~EC .0"'" ........,.j...
.. 0- '" C ~ 1.1-" :r 0
1\1 \.l IC... _ 0'1'0 . 0 c ~ M .
~ a.2 o.z';;~ ..2':-;.
>'4' 0."_ G 10I ""'.,, "01
'tl.e o.~:t~ .Co= II C:."
=....c U It "'....
., 0 at" iU I.l"_
Ct)"'" tt.,...CUO....JJ'tl~"'"
O. =...\00_._1:.....
P4 ~"uc''''..-:E.:t41
a_v. U OC:- O.
:txe;o;:a"'::i'8.
""'''_=0 wcaN.Q"~.
c a.a ... O.,l: ...... ..
IofClol......__...~II=.cO.
.....=,,"'..., .........,'"
'" SJoIJ _c.._-:J..1It U
a...~ c: _.C::\e...,j ..
'U.en e ooc 0'1-" $I"" .,w
t:_ __.02 .c-.u.
..4ot'tl.r:,*,ta::_v..\l' Mil.
41C:"""'PoOUC~SJtaQrft't
1IC. .... 0-- . 0 " ::;t.... .
W~O:ZDt A _0"'....._
00. .. ........... 0 Q,
....a.O.OC.OO....O.....
~..,llo4 ~..."wgg..l~O
"" c: r.. .."'... cu~ ..
Q....~..c_. .....
I ~... O~.2 ~!:~.~.. .~1i
.I: a..,.,.., D.oloIM ....._MM
...__Oo.uc.....uo.. ..
"-U. ...."".......'OOlU
1 _c:,w 0-..... :t"'M
110_0""_0...""...
31 :s~~~~~~~g~.g&
.
.. ..
.... ..
eN.o
.. ..
.,~
22 of
'0
"
"'
'"
on
'"
~
i:' 1"00'\.-
" ll. ~ g.
c. co
.,.,~N!O~-g~
C; ~ ~ "1 ~ <:> <:>
'CO
'"
~
..."' ...
~.~lQ""c"
..
~
:. ;-
" ]
~ :
~ lEI
~
i) U
. :::
... ..
! t
.
t: i
';'v.l
&:
N :l: ... -
e ~ ~ ~
0(
~
...
"
'i
:I
.
..
...
!
I
~ 'll
;; .., A 1
~ L~ -..,
!~fti
!:.i! Ii! ! - ~
~ U 0 is =
1
I
~
'"
.u . et; ~ ~
II !.Q . "D ...
~ " -E ..:.r:; ...
"1"4 .,~ c: It J:t-- 11II
J:J ..... o~ ,.. " u
~ :-g;;:.=.~-gz
~.:4oi~..'g..:i"...
eM. e I:~ :::]i.5...2
O......IiC II 0 lot '" ""'''' &I
.........Q,.o~a.cc:.
.I:..41.M .0......
&"'", ~.~c"f~~ 8'!-;~
. . c: _ 0 a. c.,O.. '"
"'... ......u... Ii ....._
... c ..:i::~1: ..B:5;.~
."'.c~ . ..,.... ...
M." Ot...... 0 llIA"CI~ b'I
"c::.... O....::lI 0. ........., c: E
3i:lo4&"e~:::lI~c:t
utJ.....cCla.....oi c.
...'0 g.Q~MtJU Q..c~~~
O.4l:l"".utO.l:CI"o.UQr..-
ftl:J'C ....u.c.""'....""
c~_....... "" .ce
OIli.wC."".QC ~.....o.c:
:: >.8; ;::=-::..~ 2::~
~::C,l~.u~~:.8~~
-UClQ..QM:l...Io4"1;1
G\ ~ . .........,c
"tJ ..u.....,'O 1ll.Q1t::J
..e",.OW1i\ICC.a c: .
.~.-.j..C CloD ._~" 0'11:I 1.1
.. ,.c:O 1~~..q.J.Ct
. .'~ ~:I t.; <<5::.0 g.. g-1j
M'" . Dt-.l U :I ... :r It ,w
...A. C.~. " .......
.....0 ....tIJO.:...a,V
I~.O"'''!:I "'0.0" ""
Co...,..... !if...", c: O~ cI: o.
0.. "'j"'C"~""J"O
.H",8'i OI.-4~. crt
.........e ......e...:' 'U.
o ~MO ct...O~" ....
...::11 1.,......""... ~c
:.a.~~_Ie-~e.":2t
..,Cft"",cUOlCl~.....""Ar'"
....u~... ...~>:t ....
".c: ...c:.u'*'O........
0.0"-".I:_"',Q..c_
)."'U""~.foo.,._...tJ
'" '" '"
00 ..,. to- 'Cl '"
t1~~~~~~
...
..
-
~ N
;;; ~
'"
'"
~
!""'I f'l ~ g Cl'>
~ \"'\ ~ ""': !XI
N
N
-
..,
=
u
~I
~ ~
! 1
-= ~
~ :it
~ i ~
~ ~:e 2
Cl:;.Q.cl ~
~~g~.....d
'i~:'o:'ot'~~5
~i.:\O'J '501
~~!!!! ~..sj
_~;l!3.!~B~
UJuUQaJ~...
;;
;;
...
...
"
.
c3
;;
D
:0
~
en
r--
\.D
l
- -'"
~~o .",J: ~
allll"" .ccu_....
~ "" M~ "" ~O~k ~
= III .~ou._ ....ecOlll
:~s~ ..Qo..,E'''~,;;'2.s~::.wg.
.C:OA u"Oo... ~ f7'...~"
U .c"IJetl: .........a.""u~....~ 4J.u
".u~~"'.C ~&O=CI""~.Ulll
.....= .... c~e"" ~__ ~~~
Q,oo~O"CIC:""A. Oc:....~ g,.....
.,'t'"C:~l:."" 'CI"""'0..z: ..0
... .-....4~'Oc:....U.&.J(,)~ .......
M~_ ~04C:O. 4_ M ~
_~O"'~~.k.&.J.I"'c&~~U~
uJ:l'W".C U.... . ~ -0.......,
- 2'0.0 A ..Oel -.It) """"0
"0 .. "''''CCU 'CICt,l"'O
4M~_ ~ O.~.~_~~H..._M
IffM 0 G " . 0'" lID :;I..... " III ~_ C
"'401. UG~."'~ OCtol P. lQW
O_~>OC"''C'''Co--et..,.c Ct ..&.J.
~ ~~~ =.U~.CM~"""'C~
OIllM_C~~.~ ~ .~c~~u
..=c.. IOvMoe ..IO"'U. JJ ftI
~ G"'M~MGa~C~.o ~ '0_
~.xec"'~~"O_M~~~H~~
..cO........D- ~~... .~O~.
~...U...II:!fII . ...,....~U....~..Ok
~~.o.eC~.~M.e.N__ .
e... .... .".l:J' "C....4U'0100Ij
Z~:~~~~~...~~~'O=t~:C~
...tl..~:rO_ 00... c"""O ...ftl.ll:
~M .V_~ ~.~.= e._I
.""e. 'Ouu 4_ ~~.~~
.~l~:...,S~~~;i~~~ 'O~.""
=...._c:....:.o ."~;l4 .................
UI,I.OI,I '" ..Goof. 110 ~....
c...... C~"O~-~M.z:~4~O~~""
0..,1t ..c: 00 II OIl.Q.O U
uO.Me:.~3:~iM~~.:~l
~.w..,~li:..,IotA~ti....Bi3~.
""0" .....o.u......V ar._....B ..
...., .o.o.......u:!. .tl SIoIW..
Mu..~~~a~.02v~~ ~ ...
~._~""'" __II WO.OC~M~.
"o.~ ~ -_ c.a..-._"".cl:O.....,
~.. ! .-aMe... ....GoQ,...,_C__
__A _. .~.O_. .w M~
a ~ O_OJOI~%~--OO-.
"'..vo.,.,.... .I:. ""01:.1:
.O~""'~ .....,t:c: ..........___
..c:... t:ll.u..u...... ..e_ "OIUN6
~ W~N~.... ~.IIC~Oc~~
o~o-~uo~...~~....~.w~.
-U~ .......P"'I'J,oIJ....z:. tt.........
~g=15~g;:cg~~~~~h~
...O;l..U_v.._.....);~~"".....);
-- .., ....... ~ ,......' ,... .,..... ,..................... ..................
o
~
1995 ITEM
.6
.~.
Uo.l~::a u"iBE:
.5~-::ua4c::a.o
g '2 .. ~ ':: [.; .2 .:;
.e 0; :i - r" ~ ... ... ~
v B _ _
":l~-:-;;J~ ]Oe
g2.~.tJ2~...
'O~O:l;_J~1i
~ ~ u 4 . 6 ~ C
~~~-5~X<elu.9:
. ~ " )t .3 "ii- :; tl ;
= ~ ~ ~ a I ~ 2
..._e5...~ c.
('J~u;v -t
::; ~ Cf) e ill.
s:: rn .!! ;:. c
o.!!~~a.iS8~ .
c: ..;;; .- ,. P.- .. 0.;.
"'v......:.,~~-6-l;.l
'gii~I-:~E2.llg.=
..15:... '-':so--i
"'_c ue:=a=_
... " . 1I..c .c "0 ,. .!
~- C..c - "0'" ._
e'=;;J~:~~J1~fQ
'3----e~ 05>0-
~.e~!:'i.9~.e~
oil=> 0 " 0 "ll .. ... .!:
-e_~'i:'zu~:x~
-=~-"=l~v..ij
-;-"":;1 ::1"~1!
-sg",... ,,~._
~ 1 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ; i ~
J'jJl;t~lu ~~a
-"'~=ll ....~
';'o5i'" ~"il
d~gl!~~.eg
UllH.llg~:Bii
:l]~illtri
23 of 31
~ .x
c ~ ""
UJ
~.8;e
io;: ~
~ .ll
- "
h
II " ..
~ ~ II
- ~ ~
S-5A
~.!ll
& I J
11 " g
j;;S-5
.ll"! ,j!
i 1 ~
~ c2 i
S .:! at
v ~ ..
~ lIl.i
'j .. .
i,.li
:!! 11:
Ii -
~!.!
..11
~tl
.g .g .2 -8S.g
e ! ! =:E.:
- Ii) .. ~ "
i ~ .:.: '" '<:: A-I
,..- - ~!ZiS
"~S'li W...li:l\
ii~fif~jf!f
"'i!-.Il~ "'J!a
'"W!;!; ;:; Ell'
~"lS;i"!' .
! a 1 ~
.;1
~
~
r
:a ....
is
en
~~
rlie.
13 -
.l! !j
- ~
- <
!!
~ ;
U
Ii e
;)
U Jl
~ ~
.t-
o ~
iJ
81
1
..
~ ..8
~~
c ...
1I Ii
=i Ie
8.1
'i'"
.. .
~j
.g ~
c .
c _
l~
" v
K :I'
:a~
Ii
o '"
j:g
. 11
...-
s~
- Ii
:1.:1
~.;~
'.JI'lS
!Ji
~Ii
u 2..::!
-=..!t ~
l:: Q [
" c
. .
..
l(~.:l!
8.dI
'g=~l
i ~.::
...i-io
-~. ! '2 ii
=- 2;,g a
· .., .l! I
~ Ls.:!
o ~ ...
8~ If
u '"'" e .1IC
il "ll Ii g
c ~ ~ ~
~ e = .~
.II :! Ii i
s'il!
i I j ~
!fi1
!ill!
1 j i'
: Ii II f
JUN 6
1995
ITEM . b
.
.
.'"
.'"
..'"
z~
. ...
z:;; il
. ..
".
.'It
24
of 31
.
..c
....
.. e
,.. .
",,;::
cc
.-. (71
. 0 e
0"'0 .......
4t...."" w
... 0
....010...,
;::....
'OlI3"C
C .. 0
IllC41!
.
......C'tJ
O\C.O~
" ....
.....
C_IlOCI
'g:5~g
S ~f~
"C' > u
aotl.,l
.....e
"''' ...
c....'"
-'O.c&
........
o. .
... w;::
.... C 0"'"
e...
o e..
. oe
.......
....., k
..., U CI
1:"'11I'0
0'"
-~a...
""',,"-c
C g CoX
_wef.
... c...a::;: u
... ....
~ 8'.. e
"'... 0 \I
Ill..."" c:
.. .
~&:..., .
.... "" GOO
~ wi a.~
."O.,~ ...
... c CI c t)
c..."c.
..>
~I
.. .
o ...
w e"
o
"I:l c_ O'l
III e .....AI t::"C'
11 0 u.... C
o -IIC C;I...."
a. Q'I" D ".... \roI ..
aCQ4.I:;!o-fO'tl_
W"":I U 0 Q,,,~
Q,0Ir..... U Co""''''''
tIl"-'''' 0 :t"
."10 fa"" G 1IO >..
.-elf I: .0
...... 0 CJ<J..U
:l (J I 0 .... lC l7'
.e 0-0.....,1:
10'00 t.....,., 0 '"
r~"'-"~c..!~.
u.u...o~ _
c: II: c:"...... 0 ..w
0""_..'" ~.
::.~:S;O:.z"
~~~lWul'5~.!
...:1.. 0 0 C c...,
.u.. '" G....1i
......., c ... .... k
...Ok 1C 0
.......0 _0....
.oil: ""'.... tlI,o
"" 4' U U "'..., ..,
.....ooa...a.o.
)' .....""'" 0 0""""
.,&s"c;=~""'~~
lot c: U ... II II "'_
· 0 i .co.
u ......., e4J;:t1l
c:... COli
0.40#"" DII......, "'.
uo... ....e..
.:1".......
.w Q,Go.. "'I ·
c.o.o. 0
...... Qo\ll Ol'Gl QII.
Ii ...Qe-,=
>>UM """_""
w c C Gl'Q 0 .. C
..."a II a
c............ c: . c...
.a.GoCJll...:l...c
g "WM....,
..""-_.. ....
....." ........ ~ .
.c..._ .,~o It
...........e. 'OCl
-....O...O.~.....
......0 .C:C1U
CC'IO.. Ill.....
.. c a...e"'M Q,Q,
.,....w0...
.
~
.c
"
o
"
. 1
e ... "
o "
... .
" ~ ..
c. :l ....
. 0 ...
'. !ol.:
E U G Ct
0"': .,I.I.,a....
0.101.,,, 4
..e ...
'0::1::1..""" ..
CloW.,4.t::l ~
" "" 0'""
'0...-4.:....
. ~ "'~
'" """ 0 JJ
.... C"'"'"..
> !ol 10 0 0""
ClU_....~....
104M Com"..
... ....
O...~Q
.w~>.. .
--4Da.
,..........:lGJ
...__"'w
.....1:."'" 0....
C;" I:'T'I WI ..
:l _3: *'
... 0'1. Cl c
~~oa.S'1
Q,'O eM. I:
ao"'''o&.I 0
o ~",i;:!:
., tJ c .&J >
':;w""'''C
.,1.1 ""'04.
".u c: I)
... C _!GO.
0020:: ."
..... ..
....c: - -.. .
=-.Ot.l...~...
0& )eN~...
to. C _.oN
OOCl..,J..
JI. _"" I I
i .1i:'l:t~3t;
./:J,J c: tI'O..
..0....... ..
.oo U_Q_
.,......0\ CI\
00"_ ".-
kO...'Ia"''O
Q.u"C'-z_
..
o
..
.
C
.
~..i
...0
0'"
. ..::::1 '" ..
~.'<:::l.:",
. . ...
... u ""=
~.. ;::~.2
...'"
_ ""
.. ..
...
.
...
...
...
.
;::
"
.
...
"
.
.
..
..
"
~
JUN 6.
,
1995
ITEM
6
STATE Of CALIFORNIA_THE RESOURCES AGENCY
PeTE WILSON. Go_
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
3.30 GOLDEN SHORE. SUITE .50
~G BEACH. CA 90802
,310) 590-5113
@
April 27, 1995
Mr. James Nessel
City of poway
13325 Civic Center
Poway, California
Drive, Bldg. A
92064
Dear Mr. Nessel:
Draft Extended Initial study for the
Del poniente Sewer Line Extension Project
SCH 95031046, San Diego County
A Department of Fish and Game (Department) biologist
familiar with the project area has reviewed the above-referenced
document, relative to impacts to biological resources. The
proposed project involves a two-phase extension of the Del-
poniente gravity sewer pipeline within the City of Poway. The
initial study evaluates impacts associated with the first phase
of construction, involving extension of the sewer line from the
intersection of Orange Blossom Lane and Midland Road to the
southern boundary of the approved but undeveloped Huntington Gate
residential subdivision. The second phase of the project will
involve extension of the sewer line through the Huntington Gate
subdivision and removal of an existing pump station. The project
area is located in the central portion of the City of Poway,
approximately 35 miles north of downtown San Diego. The site is
bounded by Del poniente Road on the north, Espola Road on the
east, Twin Peaks Road on the south, and Twin Peaks Mountain on
the west.
Implementation of the project would result in impacts to
0.227 acre of coastal sage scrub, 0.141 acre of disturbed coastal
sage scrub, 0.005 acre of freshwater mar~h, 0.076 acre of
southern willow scrub, 0.315 ~cre of baccharis scrub, 0.220 acre
of eucalyptus woodland, and 0.668 acre of disturbed/developed
area. The San Diego horned lizard and orange-throated whiptail
(Federal Category 2 candidates for listing) would also be
adversely affected by the loss of 0.368 acre of coastal sage
scrub habitat. In addition, approximately 0.004 acre within the
pipeline corridor supporting the San Diego sagewort, a sensitive
plant species, would be directly impacted by construction
activities.
As proposed, mitigation for impacts to 0.368 acre of coastal
sage scrub and 0.315 acre of baccharis s~rub (potential habitat
for the California gnatcatcher) would include on-site
revegetation and/or off-site habitat acquisition and preservation
25 of 31
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6
Mr. James Nessel
April 27, 1995
Page Two
via the City's Poway Subarea Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP).
Because of the small acreage and lower quality of the coastal
sage scrub habitat on site, revegeta~ion at a 1:1 ratio is
thought by the City to be the most appropriate mitigation option
for these impacts. However, if preconstruction surveys result in
the detection of gnatcatchers within the project area a 2:1
habitat replacement ratio would be implemented.
On-site revegetation would include hydroseeding the. area(s)
impacted with a coastal sage scrub mix containing those species
currently found on site, and initiation of a weed abatement plan.
The City's contract-registered Landscape Architect will prepare a
revegetation and monitoring plan to be submitted in conjunction
with the interim habitat loss permit for coastal sage scrub.
Monitoring of the revegetation area would occur from three to
five years to ensure successful restoration, with annual reports
documenting the progress of the revegetation effort. Signs
informing the public of the sensitive habitat and its value would
also be placed at access points along the pipeline corridor to
discourage people from entering coastal sage scrub habitat. If
on-site revegetation of impacted coastal sage scrub is not
feasible due to operational constraints, then acquisition and
preservation of off-site habitat would be an alternative. Off-
site replacement would be conducted at a 1:1 ratio, per City
policy, in a configuration that contributes to a viable regional
preserve system.
AS described in the Draft Initial Study, typical replacement
ratios for wetland habitats required by the resource/regulatory
agencies include 1:1 for freshwater marsh and 3:1 for southern
willow scrub. While no ratios are proposed for impacts to
wetland habitat, it is implied that a 1:1 ratio is expected from
the resource/regulatory agencies, given the quantity of habitat
to be impacted. In addition to the revegetation effort, a
qualified biologist would be retained to ensure that no
additional impacts to sensitive habitats occur during
construction activities. The biologist would also be responsible
for monitoring staking and flagging operations conducted by
project surveyors, and periodic (monthly) inspections of the
condition of sensitive habitats in proximity to the project
corridor. Further, the setback for the southwestern staging area
would be no closer than 15 feet from the outer edge of the
southern willow scrub habitat. Equipment fueling operations
within this staging area would occur at least 25 feet from the
outer edge of the southern willow scrub habitat.
The Department's comments regarding impacts to coastal sage
scrub, wetlands, and sensitive plant species are the following:
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6 ... I
26 of 31
Mr. James Nessel
April 27, 1995
Page Three
The Draft Extended Initial Study fails to address the
location and potential impacts of the project in the context of
the City's proposed Subarea RCP. Approximately two-thirds of the
project occurs within the RCP's Focus Planning Area (FPA) around
Twin Peaks. A portion also occurs within a Proposed Resource
Protection Area (PRPA #9), an area designated as at a higher risk
for impacts to biological resources, and one that should be
prioritized for acquisition and/or protection. Given the
project's location, and the likely use of the site by the
California gnatcatcher, a 2:1 mitigation ratio for impacts to
coastal sage scrub (disturbed and undisturbed) and baccharis
scrub is appropriate. This would result in a total mitigation
obligation for impacts to coastal sage scrub and the California
gnatcatcher of 1.366 acres.
Before on-site revegetation of coastal sage scrub habitat
would be acceptable, the City must demonstrate that the
revegetated areas would be contiguous with, and make a
contribution to, poway's permanent biological preserve system.
If this condition cannot be met, than all mitigation should be
directed toward appropriate habitat acquisition, protection, and-
management off site, but within the proposed preserve system.
The Department recommends that the City attempt to find
mitigation lands within PRPA #9 if possible, but lands anywhere
within the proposed Subarea RCP FPA would be acceptable. The
above mitigation would be.consistent with the Department's
Natural Communities Conservation Planning guidelines, and allow
the project to proceed under the interim 4(d) Rule for the
California gnatcatcher.
The Department concurs with the use of a 1:1 replacement
ratio for impacts to freshwater marsh habitat, but does not
concur with use of a similar replacement ratio for southern
willow scrub habitat. Given the proximity of wetland habitat to
the 12-foot-wide permanent sewer maintenance road (to be
constructed), potential for continuing direct and indirect
impacts to wildlife and wildlife habitat due to human and pet
encroachment into the project area (because of creation of the
sewer maintenance road), use of the wetland habitat by large and
small mammals such as deer, bobcat, and coyote, and ample acreage
in which to provide wetland mitigation, we recommend impacts to
southern willow scrub habitat be mitigated at a ratio of 3:1.
Further, replacement of wetland habitat should be conducted
within the project area and utilize local plant material to the
greatest extent possible. A detailed site-specific mitigation
and monitoring plan should be included as part of the Streambed
Alteration Notification submitted for this project. As described
in the initial study, this plan should detail all ~mpacts to
wetland habitats, specify in-kind replacement of tabitat quality,
27 of 31
JUN 6 1995 ITEM b
Mr. James Nessel
April 27, 1995
Page Four
planting specifications, monitoring methodology and frequency,
and reporting procedures. In addition, this plan should include
measures for the protection of the revegetation areas from human
and pet encroachment during the maintenance and monitoring
period.
The Department concurs with mitigation measures proposed for
sensitive plant impacts. These measures include flagging
sensitive plant populations located adjacent to construction
and/or staging areas and collection of seeds from affected
species (San Diego sagewort) prior to construction for use in
the on-site revegetation effort. In addition to the collection
of seeds, we recommend the top six inches of soil, supporting the
stand of San Diego sagewort to be impacted, be excavated and
spread within the area selected for the reseeding of this
species.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this
project. Questions regarding this letter and further
coordination on wetland and sensitive plant issues should be
directed to Mr. Randy Botta, Wildlife Biologist, at
(619) 675-0124. Coastal sage scrub issues should be directed to
Mr. David Lawhead, Environmental Specialist III, at
(619) 467-4211.
'h
ricia Wolf
cting Regional Manager
Region 5
cc: see attached list
28 of 31
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6
Mr. James Nessel
April 27, 1995
Page Five
cc: Mr. Randy Botta
Department of Fish and Game
San Diego, California
Mr. David Lawhead
Department of Fish and Game
San Diego, California
Ms. Terri Dickerson
Department of Fish and Game
Laguna Niguel, California
Mr. Jim Dice
Department of Fish and Game
Borrego Springs, California
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Carlsbad, California
u.S. Army Corp of Engineers
Los Angeles, California
State Clearinghouse
Sacramento, California
29 of 31
JUN 6 1995 ITEM b
, !
/
CITY OF POWAY
DON HIGGINSON. Mayor
SUSAN cALLERY. Deputy Mayo,
BOB EMERY. Councilmembet
MICKEY CAFAGNA. Councilmember
BE1TY REXFORD. Councilmember
May 18, 1995
Mr. John Lovio
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Carlsbad Field Office
2730 Loker Avenue West
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Mr. David Lawhead
California Department of Fish and Game
NCCP Program
4949 viewridge Drive
San Diego, CA 92123
SUBJECT:
Gentlemen:
The city of poway sincerely appreciates your input and creative
recommendations provided at the our May 11, 1995 meeting to resolve
the biological impact mitigation for the subject project. The
Department provided written comments on the environmental
assessment documentation prepared for this capital improvement
project.
Given the Department's comments, along with the existing and
probable continuing habitat disturbance adjacent to the project
corridor due to human access and eventual planned residential
development, the Department and the Service have recommended that
onsite impacts would be more effectively mitigated using the city's
pro12osed subarea HCP .. i1"!-lieu" mitigation fee. Such fee will be
deposited in the existing city habitat mitigation fund ~ccount and
used for habitat acquisition, restoration, monitoring, or
management, pursuant to the draft poway subarea HCP. The city
agrees with your recommendations, and provides below a summary of
the recommended measures.
Where wetland habitat mitigation is concerned, it is our
understanding that the in-lieu fee mitigation strategy must receive
approval from Ms. Terri Dickerson of the CDFG Laguna Niguel office.
As noted below, we have also sent this letter to Ms. Dickerson.
This project and its environmental documentation will be considered
for. approval by the poway city council on June 6, 1995. Therefore,
it is requested that the recommended mitigation, . including wetland
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6
30 of 31 City Hall Located at 13325 Civic Center Drive
'M h~~,o<<' P () Rox 789 Powav. California 92074-0789 . (619) 748-6600, 695-1400
Mr. John Lovio, Mr. David Lawhead
May 18, 1995
Page 2
mitigation, be fully resolved prior to this date. The City would
appreciate your support and consultation regarding the resolution
of wetland impact compensation by the proposed in-lieu fee
strategy.
Summary of In Lieu Fee Mitiqation Strateqy
The habitat acreage figures indicated below are from the project's
Extended Initial Study and are based on the total of temporary and
permanent impacts of the project. In addition, it has been agreed
that the several habitat types impacted by the project are of
"moderate" quality. Therefore, the mid-range of $10,000 per acre
in-lieu fee compensation is acceptable, and mitigation replacement
is based on recommended ratios. Please note that baccharis scrub
and disturbed freshwater marsh have been added so that all
biological impacts may qualify under the recommended in-lieu fee
strategy.
1. Coastal Sage Scrub (CSS)
- .227. acres impactedjl:l ratio equals $2,270
2. CSS-Disturbed (CSS-D)
- .141 acres impacted/1:1 ratio equals $1,410
3. Baccharis Scrub (BS)
- .315 acres impacted/1:1 ratio equals $3,150
4. Southern willow Scrub (SWS)
- .076 acres impacted/3:1 ratio equals $2,280
5.
Disturbed Freshwater Marsh (FM-D)
- .005 acres impacted/l:1 ratio equals
$50
Total In-Lieu Mitiqation Fee
$9.160
Based on the above, the City proposes to deduct the css, CSS-O, and
BS impacts from its current Special 4(d) Rule Interim Habitat Loss
Account (0.684 acres tota~). The total fee indicated above will be
deposited in the City's existing mitigation account. In addition,
the southernmost staging area will be relocated further south to
avoid impacts to the San Diego sagewort sensitive plant species, as
recommended in the biological technical report.
The City requests your approval of this mitigation strategy five
days prior to the City Council's June 6, 1995 meeting.
Jo ncerely , ,
tMv-
im Nessel
Senior Planner
cc. Ms. Terri DiCkerson, CDFG 1600 Permit Section
31 of 31
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6
;9~r~/f'1S-
LEONORA PIEROTTI THOMAB
6316 MOUNT ROYAL DRIVE LOS ANl3ELEB CALIFORNIA 90041
RECEIVED,
JUN 2 1995
CITY OF POWAY -'
CITY CLERK'S OFFIC!
27 MAY 1995
MARJORIE WAHISTEN, CITY Cl.ERK
CITY OF POWAY COUNCIl. CHAMBERS
13325 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
POWAY. CA 92074
R~:: THE UNFAIR MARKET VALUE ASSESSED TO PARCEL 1#314-650-26.
DFAR SIR/MA'AM:
I DO NOT AGREE WITH YOUIl APPRAISED VALUE OF MY 5.52 ACRES.
THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT OF MY PROPERTY. THIS PROJECT IS MAKING APPROX--
IMATELY 25.500 SQ.FT.(59% acre) OF MY PROPERTY UNACCESSABLE;
USELESS; NULL AND VOID. THIS PROJECT IS DISRUPTING ACCESS
TO ~YPRIVATE PROPERTY.
A GRANT DEED (;'t EASEMENT FOR A 40 FOOT WIDE INGRESS AND EGRESS
ROADWAY WAS RECORDED IN MARCH OF 1978. INDIAN PEAK ROAD EASTERI.Y
FROM THE THOMAS PROPERTY TO BUOWIN LANE AND SOUTHERLY ON BUOWIN
LANE TO TWIN PEAKS ROAD. (See (1 ) GRANT DEED attached). OBVIOUSLY.
MY PROPERTY CAN AND WILL BE DIVIDED INTO FOUR PARCELS. AS WAS PRO-
POSED IN 1966 AND 1989 APPRAISALS ~ BY THE CITY OF POWAY ENGINEER.
YOUR PROJECT STUDY CLEARLY SHOWS THIS EASEMENT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS
TO THE THOMAS PROPERTY. (See (.z J PAGE 4-14 attached). INDIAN PEAK
ROAD IS CURRENTLY BEING IMPROVED IN THE AMOUNT OF $70.000. I. TOO.
MUST CONTRIBUTE.
POWAY'S DRAFT _~ENDED INl.:n.bl....STI!I2X-~:QB.. THE DEL_EQlU~~~D
~~_~T~~L~PROJECT (MARCH 1995) STATES:
"TH~: CITY OF POWAY WILL BE B~MI2.IQ...fAY FAIR MARKET V~. . .
TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS. . . " THEREFORE. YOU MUST PAY THE $3.44
PER SQ.FT., NOT 18~ PER SQ.FT. (See (.3) PlAT PLAN WITH VAl.UES
at Lached ) .
"THE SEWEll AL 1 GNMENT WOULD F.X'rEND THROUGH THE CENTER O~' FOUR
PRO PERT 1 ES. . . THOMAS PROPERTY... FRAGMENTATION OF THE UNDEVELOPED
PARCELS WOULD POTENTIALLY ~~_~,.EI..9PMENT OF THE
LOTS. . . ~!.!1..TING__.l1LA SIGN1.f.~:rJ!'lPACT. YOU MAY NOT REDUCE
THE VALUE. NOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. OF MY LAND. 18C/SQ.FT. FOR
6,670 SQ.FT. IS ABSURD!
_ "EASEMENT ACQUISITION.. .WOULD NOT RFSULT IN.. .THE DISRUPTION OF
ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTY." I DO NOT AGREE WITH THIS STATEMENT.
F'..ASEMENT ACQUISITION ~IL!2~1"_llU:r...EL.Y RESULT IN THE DISRUPTION OF'
ACCESS TO MY PRIVATE PROPERTY.
(See (4) PAGE 4-25 attached).
JUN 6 1995 ITEM 6
LEONORA PIEROTTI THOMAS
5315 MOUNT ROYAL CRIVE LOS ANGELES CALIFCRNIA 90041
WE GRANTED A 60 "'ClOT WTDE EASEMENT IN 1987 FOR THE B.liiHI.~WAY MAP
9.f~E..L PQ~.J.WI"E SEWER EXTEN~. (See (5) EASEMENT MAP attached)
YOU ARE ~.9W PROPOSING THIS SEWER LINE AND tTTILITY TO BE 50 FEET
FARTHER INTO MY PROPERTY. THIS IS NO,. FAIR DEALING. THIS IS UNJUST.
(See (6) 20 FOOT EASEMENT attached).
YOU HAVE APPRAISED MY PROPERTY AT ONE-QUARTER ITS FAIR MARKET VALUE
AND GIVEN A VALUE TO ONLY 6.670 SQ.FT.(NOT 25.500 5O.FT.). THEN.
YOU HAVE. AGAIN. PENALIZED ME BECAUSE IT IS A CREEK BED. I FEEL THE
CREEK BED IS AN ASSET TO MV PROPERTY AND ITS tv. ulTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
WILDLIFE AND GARDENS. $0.182 PER SQ.FT.X 6.670 SQ.FT.~ $1.214.
18 CF.:NTS PER SQUARE FOOT?! b.670 SQUARE FEET?! THIS IS IiQI ACCEPT-
ABLE!
MY PROPERTY IS IMMEDIATELV SURROUNDED BV SEVEN UNDEVELOPED PARCELS
TO THE EAST AND SOUTH: ALL 010" WHICH HAVE THE SAME CREEK BED ADVANT-
AGES: PARCELS 314-650-32.-33.-34.-35.-36.-37.AND -38. THESE
EQUIVELANT PROPERTIES RANGE IN PER SQUARE FOOT PRICE FROM $1.51 PER
SQ.FT. TO $3.44 PER SQ.FT. ON": ADJACENT PROPERTY WITH THE SAME
CREEK BED JUST SOLD FOR $2.30 PER SQ.FT.#314-650-35. (See (7)
PLAT Pl.AN attached).
IS THIS A TIlRNABOUT YOU HAVE PUT ON MY PROPERTY? PUT IT ON SOMEONE
ELSE'S PROPERTY. DON'T FACE IT WEST IN1'O MY PROPERTY. FACE IT ~!
EAST TOWARD EXIST. 60' EASEMENT! -(See (B)PLAT PLAN attached).
A SEWER LINE IS NECESSARV, BUT I tlQ OBJECT TO:
1. THE UNFAIR MARKET VALUE ASSESSED:
2. THE TAKING OF AN ADDITIONAL 50' X 370'(APPROX.) BEYOND
THE EXISTING 60' EASEMENT WE ALREADV GAVE;
3. THE MAINTENANCE ROAD AND TIlRNABOUT INTO MY PROPERTY:
4. THE DISRUPTION OF ACCESS TO MY PRIVATE PROPERTY;
ACCORDINGLV. I BELIEVE THAT THE FAIR MARKET VAl.UE OF THE PART
OF MV PROPERTY WHICH THE CITY OF POWAV WOULD BE UTILIZING AND/OR
RENDERING USELESS IS $87.720 (25,500 SQ.FT. X $3.44 PER SQ.I-T.).
THEREFORE. THIS LETrER SHALL CONSTITIlTE MY CLAIM FOR PAVMENT
IN THIS AMOUNT AS A RESULT OF THE CITY OF POWAV'S PROPOSED
TAKING OF THAT PORTION OF MV PROPERTY.
I ALSO DEMAND ASSURANCES THAT 1 WILL "OT BE LANDLOCKED BV THIS
PROJECT. IN OTHER WORDS. MV PROPERTY WILL HAVE SUFFICIENT INGRESS
AND EGRESS FROM BOTH MIDLAND ROAD AND INDIAN PEAK ROAD. AS PER
MY PREVIOUSLY RECORDED EASEMENTS.
S~CpV. J
~tft&amtU
JUN 6 1995 ITE!'.:rt~llli
e~.' ~ vJ~
cc: HONORABLE MAVOR. COUNCILMEMBERS. CITY A'M'ORNEY. PLANNING SVCS.DIR.
_URDlric; AE'.JUt';o'TEO Sf
'> . ~ 11:9.1
,
. ,
"&COIIIO&O .A'L THI. 0&&0 A~D ",NLIE.. OTHIEII
.N .'a..c;.W. "A'" 'All .fA'l"~Iof'. '0
[ 1 J
GRANT DEED
4D' WIDE
F.AS~EICT
7S-10BG14
Leonora Pierotti
Box 111
Placentia, CA 92670
I
;':'. ......':":--~
. ,,~,. 1,..~
!..ll;~ ;~':::I:u AE,:utS1 Or
-; YL~'1.......L ):/ ;p <fur 4
M~~ B \2 42 f\o\ '15
~
..J
c.: r~c;;.~ f-E:OROS
SAH.lJIL~O r.ou..n. tAL-IF.
u&ItLEY F ,BLOOM
KtCORDER
r No.
.:.rrow Nu,
.~AelE ....OVE THIS LINE "'OR ,.ECO,.OE,,'S USE ~~ nn
ASSLSSOR'S PARCEL NC. portion of 314-032-17
lil\i\NT UEED ;~~:o~~~~~ and portion of
'f' undl"r..iJ!llctl dcdiolrl"''' t1'~L L1.c 11","UJlII:1l11U')' 11';,II.f.:r lioI\ u ,__:::.~:-::...,?~....~.~.~.s.ideration.,..
I l:Ollll'ulNI Oil Iht' full v"llIt' "I Ihe iUIt:rc..1 Uf ",ruperty ....,,"c)'ctl. or i..
J computed gn Ilu: full \'alue 1\:>> IIaC villue or licIlli ur cu..:umLloIlIt:cai rrmaininK then:.." loll lilt: lime ur ...Ie, Th., lauJ.
Ilelnlmt.~ ur rculty i. IOl'illcd ill
unintlifpnnllcd arc.. 0 l,:ilY 01
."HI i"
tlH 1\ VAJ.U,"'BLF: CO:\"S1DEBATIO~, r~l:t'ipt of whidl i... hereby .dwowlcdg~J.
M~TT w. SOK~CH and MARY A. SOKACH, husband and wife,
trrcby CRANT(S) to
~ONORA PIEROTTI, an unmarried woman,
Iht rollo"lll~ dl:'lljlll~c1It'.lll,rul'crly ill tlll~
!:u\lllly of SAN DIEGO
. ..tiolU' ul Califl,lruia:
Easements for ingress and egress, roadway and purposes incideneal
thereto, to and from the property of Grantee, oVer and across the
property of Grantor, Easterly and southerly over ~xisting privat~
road easements, Southerly on private eaaemene Bud....in Lane to T'win
Peaks Road. said easements ar~ particularly described on Exhibit A
attach~d hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.
Said easements are appurtenant to the property of Grantee specifically
described in Exhibit B attached hereto and by ttlis reference nlade a
part hereof.
Such easements shall automatically extinguish upon the completion of
Midland Road, or other public roadway, providing direct access to and
from the property of Grantee described in Exhiblt B.
Dllle,1
~_~~~~~L_l_9.?_B_.
_(j:'-P J;~---
~ W. SOKA~lI .J~- ~
~"",""L ._. _.I~'----
MA Y~'tIl<ACl1
ST.\TE lIF C...I.lFlllI!'lil.\ \
S. 'f ~~
I "."~_ .;;' at') Dleqo
II" ""'-,1\.'" (. ~ ~ ,1970"'1",.. ....., I'''' ....1..,.
~.. '" 1'..1.1" "', .....1 I.., ",I I..".". ..."I.....h 1"........11,
..----- --
,..:;>R r....... ......y :;.l:Al.. 0" $TA~~
01"1..,.....1
~~TT W. SOKACH and
I'\ARY A.. SOAACil
.1..""""1"..,,
_ .. _........ "rI''''''''^Yt/'t.Yt/'^,,^~
.......~~.-.... O...CI.... I'A" )-
~ ~~~:-.; UNA A. CLAnK .:
~ ~. ~...;; NUIIl.Ml l'UUIIC ,C'UIIUMNIA :.
.: ~:~f. 1"""'I~IOIlICt:.salllJlC""U.'_II."
)0 ~~ My CommiSSIon bra JUIL 6. 1111 ).
< ___ --V-~.",^.,.
,..",..V^V.....,........... -
1.1" ,I.,' ,...,_.".. ..1......11<1"'.& aro .ul....."I..,.I....I... .,110..,
.,..11.....1..,1;."..1 110.,. th~y..,.,........l II... ..;I..".,
c:1~~
~illllllllllr" "I NUI..rv
JUN 6
1995
ITEM Q
'.1
"All, T\"( :'iT.o\TnH~""",,.O !'\IIT)" SIIUWN O~ .'(\1..10WI:\G L1Nr; ....IIte) p:\lrry ~1l...tIlJWN. M..\II,ASI\IIlE,.llll \ lion:
._~--~...~_.... _._.__.~..... .-...--,-...-..
H.m"
._--~ .-... ..-- ..-.,.....
"'""", !..IJr,..
---------..-. -....
Citt l- SI;lI..
[ Z J PROJECT STUDY S"')WI"G
40' EASEMEIIT.PI 4-14.
k1
.
~
>'.1
! '1";- ........
, I. Y.- ~..,..
liJ?/
. , ...., ~I ,,"
'~..II'-
: "" ::l~"-:'''''' In
- . . .....,"...-.. III
,- orr;"" ..-
. .,~'" ':,... <f ,. ~ I 11 11
'...... 'r I .. I ~.
...... ',I ': p> . & .)!
\ :+I~!: i.t fA ~
, ,Ill: ; ~ ~
" I . ~ .; :y,
fil ~ 88~ J:li
I~I . -:"d ~;~
'ii ~l~:;D ~i~l
o Ii" !'i~
u u~ ~2~~
8 qH~!Jn
:; ~.~d~~'€!
.... :: 'C:: .:D ": .J:. ~ C : ~
.... '0{ ~ ~ '';:.;.;': -}". ::.
~ . . . . . . . .
i~
A ~
.Z. ~
~
.
E
~
~
\J
<
II
.
;:
~l
~,i
~ ~
- ~ ~ ~ .
! s ~ 'i :'
~~=2=
c. ~ 0 _ ~
~~ ~ ~ ~-
:: :::.,,;:-
.;: l:j :. -:
.f.
.
~
. " .
!~
'"0:
:;;c
U
~=
. .
...,.co c
tArhu, a. 211'ch >
lI)U'Jcn(/)xJ:~J:J:J::::::w
LlUUClilf.)Ij,I....cnVlCCC ~
~ J: ~
0. Q,. <II ... ;:.
<II "" U C ~-
@..
\\lp\p.]l
~",,\'-
<rf}-1- .
-....",...
"
....'
..
-----
..-!'- .
......\.\l'~
_~.....1C'" ...,
,.. f~~~
\SO"
0
, .
...- 0 ~,
0 l'
0 b
0 . JUN 6 1995 ITEM Ii
, ..
Ir'_.. : ~'
-< ."3 J I'I<OI'~:HTY VALUES
Mll:'fER'O
~ 14 .,.s0 - DS"
5.54-^c..
I
~.~~ J:
314.6~0 ~'j (Sanchez
1/
/
.7
:tc.Nu
.,
O.!S~t.
l.U.cl'I
'$~- '5l:> ICl
2.. '2.!5'....c.
Mvo,\.CC
~
o.5'lAC.
314.650.15 l'J1,
(Czarasly ~ f\ll
I.OOI'le 1.0lAc:. t..J I
"..... I. 314-650.14
I (Czarasly
~"'>oI
1.2!5"Ac.
~I" "5'0' ~
1i1l"~~
I.OO-'lC.
:31'\ . '5'O-J:L..
314-650-3S (DaVIS
J.OO~ """"r/tl",~ 16
S'OO.OOO '3-1"1 c;.So.., I
(S2.:JO/st :&14 ..50-'?
/$125,00 :: "lAC J.OSAC.
($2.87/sf)
314.65C>-34 (Davis
I.OO'<;C.
314.650-26 (Thomas $135.000
5.5;(.AC. ($3.10/sf) I.c:::tl":> "nCTll"'~ "oLL.... N I
:3\~, (I. 314. ~6"O--U; '!Ii4-('5"C ,,,
1// $150,000 "'~'GSO.'z. :.OS-AC. /'0.0"":' I
/ I
($3.44/sfl 1>"''ll~ I
Co
INDIAN PEAK ROAD
S~NEJI)~ ~N~~'
~I~ e~. Mol'tr. '!l1+.650-~ "!l14- '50 ':l.%.
~1+."!5"'.a7 C.! 1.0.<: 0."0"'-
$135.000 01.0 SAC. i
($1.51/sf) I
I
i :
I 314.65C>-36 (Rios / """-trr _ste. "'CfCl: ~ ~^ i
1.8+"'C. 31~"SO' 3-8 :3'4-Ub'.aq. -:e~ .'-5'"0 -~ I I
0.\;5'....c.
$125,OUO / ::c.OGA~l S~, 000 t.l.6<oAC. I
($1.5&/sf) ($1 _ 74/sf) ,
314-652-21 (SDG&E Property)
,
31.4-651-03
(Poway Unified School Districl)
J..~. /~y
i ~.
I~' Q:
I /~ /
t ,\ I;
~
/
,
/ ,
/ I
/ /
/
I!(
\ l
III
JUN 6 19 5 ITEM ~ I 'r ~ I
I I
( 4 J
PROJECT S11JDV
PAGE 4-7.5
Impact
The southern 280 feet of the sewer alignment would traverse an area for which a dedicated
84-foot wide City easement already exists. However, beginning at the Poway Unified
School District propeny, the alignment would extend through eight parcels, resulting in a
total easement acquisition of 1.08 acres of land (Figure 4-7). The sewer alignment would
extend through the center of four propenies, two of which are currently undeveloped
(Po way Unified School Propeny and Thomas Propeny). Although the amount of land
needed for the easement alignment would be minimal (less than one acre), fragmentation of
the undeveloped parcels would potentially constrain future development of the lots as
allowed by their land uselzoning designation, resulting in a significant impact. The
easement alignment from the Poway Unified Property to the Czarasty Propeny would be
maintained as a 12-foot wide Class n aggregate base sewer maintenance road, while the
remaining easement area (20 foot corridor through Sanchez property) would not be used
for a maintenance road although capping with the Class n aggregate material would
remain.
The sewer alignment would extend along the edges of the remaining parcels which are
currently developed with single-family homes. These propenies appear to be developed to
their allowed densities and. therefore, the extension of the pipeline through these propenies
would not disrupt future development of the lots. Easement acquisition needs for the
project would not result in the removal of homes or the disruption of access to private
property .
Socioeconomic impacts as a result of easement acquisition and fragmentation of private
property would be considered a significant impact if unmitigated. The following measure
below would reduce this impact to below a level of significance. No additional
socioeconomic impacts would occur since no homes would be removed and access would
be maintained for the affected propenies during and after construction activities.
Measures IncoJ:POrated to Prqject
I. The City of poway will be required to pa, fair market value or equal consideration as
required by law to all propeny owners whose land Is required for easement purposes
related to the proposed project.
3127JJOOO
4.25
JUN 6 1995 ITEM b
, \
-~-----_.-
r ~> J (1 01 2)
19t5"l St.'WER EASEMENT 60'
~ )
NTS
~ I AREA
TO BE ACQUIRED
AP NO.514-"'50-t~
---.:;: :2 .' .
-/. ..,./'
;IG.I:IT OF WAY PARCEL NO AI5~-Z
u.. .~O. SI4-"?O-~/O .'
~ OF AQUISIT~ JZ 009 6F.
)ATE 9-2.3-87 .~
)WNER LEOMJRA P ROHE
RIGHT OF WAY
MAP OF
DEL PONIENTE
SEWER EXTENSION
.--- --;---.-- --- .
I
/
p
'"
I
'r-'
I'
I
I '
I
, I
I
/ :
,
I ., I (l of l)
, (lB'1 ~t;WER EASDlENT bO'
I
N
~
N .
v:\ U
<0 III
~.""'J N
O~1l1
i=~~
.~
M
~~ ggE /'
...no .of
>.DOOM
< I .0 .
C.---N
~ (/1(/1
:"l
or
r"'l .o~
, uo v.
v;orco.....
-;/'10 ..r--
>.DOIll:ll
< I oN 0
Q~__N
~ (/1(/1
r->
-
, ,
r"'j 0 0......
1 U 0 III
:r.OIllO.....
'"'" of) 0 .. 0
>.DOIl1-
< : . t""', .
c...,.--l'""'l
- (/1(/1
M
I. /
N'
,;.. / .to; ~ 0 0 ~
i \ '.. I i, 1 U 0 III
I { rl ~oIllO"'"
I " _~i ...JlO .or
, ~ >.Dooor
I'" <' . Jl '
/ !::Ii 0""'--:-'
I Ifi ~ :::, (/I tJl
I C
----,./.; ---'" ------------
r~--
01. I
I ~ I
\ ~'i
.....
. 3
INDIAN PEAK TRAIL
-------------
&
. 'Of
(j
o
.D
""') .Ol"i""j
I t.:OUl
::l1ll0.....
I"l or ..D
.D:Ilitllf:
h' /
, '8 I
~~ /
h:: I
.O~' I
f5'{..... I
a .. /
~ I~
I
JUN 6 1995 ITEM b 'I \
!-
:t:
i~ .0....
.1 UO III
UO 1lI0.....
tiJ.t"lJ"J ..-
V:.D0.r.1Il
, .~ .
f-~N- -
~ - (/I (/I
a::M
..
ra.
!-
=
i::; . 0....
,1 U 0 III
HOIllO.....
...l.f)~ ..~
~~o.r.r-
1 . III '
f-~N--
~~ (/1(/1
a::r->
..
,~.--
---...-..
~
N .
V:I t.:
<0 'tI
J: I.o~ ~
OIC'"
;l: I .
I-~'"
.-
M
~
, . C...
; t,;C III
~1ll0"""
, -..\,0
, l.r.
I f...> J
SEWI:;R LINI:;
20' WIDE
EASEMENT
/
/
I
g:
(;j
/
N
,'-.
I'
I
/
,
;
I
-
-, .O~~
~elll
:!:iO-::c......
.,....r. 0 ..0
~~oo,.,
... .0.
C"--!">.l
; 'J'Hh
~
- . 0 "-i
, l.;C V.
ViO"':O.......
-~o ..:",,-
>.::o.r.co
< I .~ '
C..--N
- <fl<l)
M
-
- .0....
. _::: 0 VI
'J'. _ ... 0.......
-.I".c .0
>..cc~-
< .!"'j'
QIIIl;"--M
~, I..f> IJ)
!. I
,,'. I J:I :::
./ \ '\ / I~~ I to> g ~
\1. ~ ~o~o......
I '. _o!!J - '" 0 . ~
I '..;) >.::oo~
(;;' < . J1 '
I -i C...--M
I l:Ji ::t :: <I) <I)
I "' '
____~ ___5; ____________
INDIAN PEAK TRAIL
----
--------------
~
-"if
(j
o
h. /
'I I
w..~ /
...: I
.o~ I
15~" I
I:JI$~ I
.. I
,/
JUN 6 1995 ITEM .6
I-
:l::
0:""-
S:::""". '0.....
. i WO III
\.10'tl0.....
.a".r:.n ..-
~..co.n~
'M .
f-lI:f'N--
~ - (/) IJ)
ll::,.,
-
to..
l-
ll::
i ~ .0'"
. I U 0 III
!,J,ClllO.....
_U"llf') ..~
1Il.:l 0 1I\r-
i . U"l .
!-..N--
1Il- (1)<1)
ll::M
-
ro.
r -/ J
3'46~0-J~
SOLD FOR
$2.30/50.1'1.
I
I
/
~
r;;
I
N
,
,-
I
I
I
.c
N .
t!:l to;
<0",
J: ..-, N
O.t:J'l
i=';',r;
-
l""l
~: ~g~ /
-.no ..01'
<>.cOCM
. C .
C"--N
<1'111'1
'""
.,.
r-: .0....
I U 0 :r.
VlO'llC....
-;,(')0 .:--
>.co.r.:c
C I .N .
O"--N
(/'111'1
l""l
r"". . 0....
u c :n
:roo"'::>....
_.no -0
>.c::>.r.-
< . ~ .
0.'11I:'--:""')
- (/,HI'I
l""l
'. I
N
'1"' I !:t - . C....
./ I~ lUOrr.
II .~ ~O~O,
I !>I:{ _.1'.0 ..,.
-J >.cOO'"
I ,.. < ..r..
I rj~ c.,--~
I ,:J~ ~ ::; <lHI'I
I /" ~
____J-I. --- ------------
INDIAN PEAK TRAIL.
--------------
~
J
o
::>..
::> III
::>....
-.c
fl.r.
l" /
It /
.... /
.O~ I
f5~" I
~a~ I
.. I .I
JUN 6 1995
ITEM .6
Ii
f~ -0..
. : ~ 0 en
\./0 'llc....
~.l':.r'J ..-
rr..t: c.r..r.
.-
f-"N~":
v: - IJ'i IJ'i
"',....
-
r..
f-
'"
i::; .0....
.. I U 0 If.
uo"'o....
Cil.nJ'l ..,.
Vl.:lO.r.r--
; .;Il .
.....,N__
l/l- lIHI'I
"'M
...
I ~
I ~ - . c....
.I ,~~ u 0 u;
{ . ~o~o,
I _oj -....0.....
:>..:>00....
/" C.......
ti~ C'lIf - - ~
/ :J~ ~ =. IJ'IIJ'I
I ./ ~
____J-' --- ------------
r 8 J
J ~ f'OQT LONG
STRI-:ET
N
~
N.
v: 1 U
co III
:E.'" N
O..:>or.
~~.,.;
M
-.J
oq"
$
!}j
/
. ,
r....--
~. I
.' .
1 ~j
I ~z
\ ....
. i3
~g
I IlD~
, I 1:1..
I
/
I
~
;;;
,
, -
I
I
/
,
.
:Il:~g~ /'
-.no .01'
~.c~g,:
c..-_~
1J'I'.f)
..,
01
-: . C ....
1,;0 rr.
:1:0"00......
-J")O a:"--
>..co.r::c
C 'N'
C"--N
IJ'IIJ'I
. .
- .0....
I,; C :Il
:l:C"'=>.......
-.r. 0 ..0
:>..:>o.r.-
< . - .
c...--:~
~ (/)V)
INDIAN PEAK TRAIL.
--------------
----\
y
Q...
Q III
0.....
oJ.!)
or
.
i I ;
____--i_____~
-" !
/
/
'"
~
/'"
~
J
o
. /
kl
Ii! /
...:: I
.Q~ I
f5;' I
~iS~ I
I
I
JUN 6 1995 ITEM .6
....
.z
i~ .Q..
. 1;';0 r.n
;;.c::'Co.......
..a....J'", .._
:r.~o.r: .r.
.-
~.~;,.:.:.
:r. - (/) (I)
.z..,
:..
....
:I::
i;!; .Q...
o I U Q Ul
UOlllQ'
~ ~.r: ....
:Il..:>o.r.r--
. . or'> .
!-.,N-_
;n- .(/)<1)
=M
-
:..