Item 9 - TTM 89-06RA Carriage Rd Townhomes Richard DePietro
_..
AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
-
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members ~ City Council
FROM: James L. Bowersox, City Mana
"
INITIATED BY: John D. Fitch, Assistant City Manager'l-; r r
Reba Wright-Quastler, Director of Plarlhing Serv ces
DATE: August 1, 1995
SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map 89-06(RA), Carriage Road Townhomes, Richard DiPietro,
Applicant.
ABSTRACT
A request to amend a condition requiring the installation of a pedestrian walkway
connecting La Venta Drive and the town home project , which is located at the northeast
corner of Poway Road and Carriage Road in the RC zone.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
- A Negative Declaration was adopted with the original approval of the project, which
anticipated the environmental impacts. No further review is required.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Public notice was published in the Poway News Chieftain and mailed to 202 property
owners within 500 feet of the project boundary.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council find that the previously issued Negative
Declaration adequately addresses the environmental impacts of the project and adopt
resolution subject to conditions.
ACTION
-
<,'O'TV'DLANNING\REPORT\TTM8906.SUM
1 of 17 AUG 1 1995 ITEM 9
- ---- ----- -------.-....- ------.-
--_.._-------~-- ------------- --- - --.------ --
------------....-..----
AGENDA REPORT
CITY OF POW A Y
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James L. Bowersox, City Ma~ .
",
INITIATED BY: John D. Fitch, Assistant City ManagerC~lt ~
Reba Wright-Quastler, Director of Plan ng Services ~
Marijo Van Dyke, Associate Planner
DATE: August 1, 1995
SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map 89-06(RA), Carriage Road Townhomes,
Richard DiPietro, Applicant: A request to amend a condition
requiring the installation of a pedestrian walkway connecting
La Venta Drive and the townhome project, which is located at
the northeast corner of Poway Road and Carriage Road in the RC
zone.
APN: 317-090-44, 46 & 47
BACKGROUND
The original approval for Carriage Road Townhomes was given on September 12,
1989. The 72 units which were approved are located on an elevated property at
the northeast corner of Carri age Road and Poway Road. A condition of that
approval required the provision of a pedestrian path which would connect the
townhome project with the Heritage Hills neighborhood at the northern property
line. The final phase of the townhomes in nearing completion and the path has
not been completed.
FINDINGS
A request has been received from the developer, and on behalf of the residents
of the units which are now sold and occupied, to eliminate the requirement for
the pedestrian path. The arguments against construction of the connection are
as follows:
a. The route from the end of La Venta Drive above to the finished grade
of the townhomes is very steep, a 2:1 slope at an average height of
approximately 20 feet. A stairway would be needed.
ACTION: I
J
2 of 17 AUG 1 '995
- -,
Agenda Report
August 1. 1995
Page 2
b. The project's homeowner's association is very reluctant to assume
liability for maintenance of the stairway, and possible injury to
anyone using the stairway, since it would be located on the
project's property.
c. The route does not allow for disabled access. In fact it would only
available for those fit enough to climb the stairway.
d. The owners and project developer are concerned about allowing
persons other than residents to walk through their common property,
in that there is a reduced sense of security for the residents.
e. The remaining portion of the project is in foreclosure and will be
auctioned on August 6th. There are no project funds remaining to
construct the stairway.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A Negative Declaration was adopted with the original approval of the project,
which anticipated the environmental impacts. No further review is required.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Publ ic notice was publ ished in the POlliay News Chieftain and mailed to -.Z.QZ.
property owners within 500 feet of the project boundary.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council find that the previously issued Negative
Declaration adequately addresses the environmental impacts of the project and
adopt resolution subject to conditions.
JLB:JDF:RWQ:MVD:kls
Attachments:
A. Proposed Resolution
B. Zoning and Location Map
C. Partial Site Plan
AUG 1 1995 ITEM 9 I
3 of 17
RESOLUTION NO. P -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY 0 F POWA Y, CALI FORN IA
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 89-06
AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-20
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 317-090-44, 46 & 47
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 89-06, hereinafter "Map" and Development
Review 89-20 submitted by Nexus Development Corp, applicant, for construction
of a 74 unit condominium complex and related recreational facilities on a site
located in the City of Poway, County of San Diego, State of California,
described as a portion of the south half of the northeast quarter of Section
14, Township 14 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Meridian, and Lot 1 of
Golden City Unit No.1 Map No. 6877, regularly came before the City Council
for public hearing and action on September 12, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Planning Services has recommended approval of
the map subject to all conditions set forth in the Planning Services
Department report; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has read and considered said report and
initial study recommending a Negative Declaration with mitigation measures,
and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the city council of the City of Poway does hereby
resolve as follows:
Section 1: Environmental Findinas:
The City Council finds that the project will not have a significant
adverse impact on the environment with the adoption of a Negative
Declaration.
Section 2: Findinas:
The City Council also makes the following findings in regard to
Tentative Tract Map 89-06 and the map thereof:
Tentative Tract MaD 89-06
1. The tentative tract map is consistent with all applicable general
and specific plans, in that the property is designated for
condominium development.
2. The design or improvement of the tentative tract map is consistent
with all applicable general and specific plans, in that the
74 unit complex complies with the development standards of
the RC zone.
3. This site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed in that development is located on the level portion of
the site and slopes are designated as open space.
~ of 17 _UG 1 1995 ITEM 9
- -
Resolution No. P-
Page 2
4. This site is physically suitable for the density of the
development proposed, in that the project density of 12 dwelling
units per acre meets the General Plan we criteria for the RC lone.
5. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife
or their habitat in that the site has been previously graded and
mitigation measures will be implemented to reduce potential
impacts.
6. The tentative tract map is not likely to cause serious health
problems because City water and sewer service will be provided to
all lots.
7. Design of the tentative tract map will not conflict with any
easement required by the public at large now of record for access
through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.
8. The project qualifies for sewer capacity per Ordinance No. 281 for
the following reasons:
- a. The project can be classified as an "in-fill" project as
defined by the Land use Element of the General Plan (la thru
Ie) as it is an urban development project bounded on four
sides by existing urban land uses.
b. The property owner will provide a public benefit by
regarding and landscaping a site where previous substandard
grading has resulted in barren eroding slopes. The site is
located at a major intersection and development of an
aesthetically pleasing project on this corner will benefit
the entire community.
Develooment Review 89-20
1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Poway
General Plan, in that the density and type of sue is consistent
with the General Plan designation of Residential Condominium.
2. That the proposed development will not have an adverse aesthetic,
health, safety, or architecturally related impact upon adjoining
properties because rooflines, building materials, and
architectural design are compatible with the adjacent development
and the General Plan design standards and multi-family
development.
3. That the proposed development is in compliance with the Zoning
Ordinance, in that it meets all development standards for the RC
zone.
AUG 1 1995 ITEM 9 4
5 of 17
Resolution No. P-
Page 3
Section 3: Citv Council Decision:
The City Council hereby approves Tentative Tract Map 89-06 and
Development Review 89-20, a copy of which is on file in the Planning
Services Department, subject to the following conditions:
Within 30 days of approval: The applicant shall submit in writing that
all conditions of approval have been read and understood; and (2) the
property owner shall execute a Covenant on Real Property.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
SITE DEVELOPMENT
1. ~ ~e~estfiaR trail shall he ~e~ieate~ aA~ ;M~reJe~ t8 ~r8~i~e aeeess
treM La YeRta grive t8 Peway Reaa. The imprevemERt aHa leeati8R af the
trail shall Be subjeet t8 tAe appre~al af the 9ireeter af PlaRRiRg
Ser';; ess.
2. One hundred forty-eight garage spaces shall be provided to City
standards. Automatic garage door openers will be provided for all
garages.
3. Site plans shall be revised to provide a minimum distance of 25 feet
between two story buildings. All private patio areas shall be located
outside of the required building setback areas.
4. No building within the project shall exceed two stories in height as
defined by the Uniform Building Code. Plans for Building type "A" must
be revised to meet this standard prior to issuance of building permits.
5. All utility connections shall be designed to coordinate with the
architectural elements of the site so as not to be exposed except as
necessary. Pad-mounted transformer and/or meter box locations shall be
screened.
6. A six foot high slumpstone or split face masonry wall is required along
the rear and side property lines. The specific design, material, and
location of the wall shall be to the satisfaction of the Director of
Planning Services. The wall may be located at the top or toe of slopes
rather than on the property line if this is determined to be beneficial
to adjacent property owners.
7. A minimum of 250 cubic feet of lockable storage space shall be provided
for each unit.
8. Each unit shall contain a hookup for washer and dryer.
9. Two detailed children's play areas that incorporate the normal amenities
(slides, swings, and boxes, etc,) shall be submitted and approved by the
Director of Planning prior to building permit issuance.
AUG 1 1995 ITEM 9
6 of 17
..- _.
- Resolution No. P-
Page 4
10. The development shall prohibit all parking of recreational vehicles by
recordation of a deed restriction.
11. All private patio areas shall be enclosed, with a combination of
landscaping and fencing. Specific materials and location shall be to
the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services.
12. The site plan shall include interior walkways to separate pedestrian and
vehicular traffic wherever feasible.
13. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit an
acoustical analysis of the proposed project. The analysis shall
incorporate the standards contained in the Element of the General Plan
(Objective 1, Policy Ib thru Id) which establishes 45 dBA CNEL as the
acceptable indoor noise level and 65 dBA CNEL as the maximum outdoor
noise level for multi-family developments. The building plans shall
incorporate the sound attenuation measures recommended by the acoustical
analysis subject to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning
Services.
14. At the completion of construction, and prior to occupancy, interior and
exterior CNEL shall be determined by field testing at developer's
expense. Tests to be conducted by a recognized acoustical expert. No
occupancy permits shall be granted until Condition G-7 is met to the
satisfaction of the Building code (latest adopted edition) .Sound
Transmission Control..
15. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on
file in the Planning Services Department and the conditions contained
herein.
16. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions
of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Services Department prior
to issuance of building permits.
17. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of
the Zoning Development Code and all other applicable City Ordinances in
effect at the time of building permit issuance.
18. Mail boxes shall be installed according to a plan which is acceptable to
both the Post Office and the Director of Planning Services.
19 Trash receptacles shall be enclosed by six foot high decorative masonry
walls with view-obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. The
location and number of enclosures shall be subject to approval by the
Planning Services Department.
20. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building
code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric
Code, Uniform Fire Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances
in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
~UG 1 1995 ITEM 9
7 of 17
Resolution No. P-
Page 5
21. For a new residential dwelling unit(s), the applicant shall pay
development fees at the established rate. such fees may include, but
not be limited to: Permit and Plan Checking Fees, School Fees (in
accordance with City-adopted policy and/or ordinance), Water and Sewer
Service Fees. These fees shall be paid prior to final map approval
(Plan checking fees, security deposit for water, sewer, drainage,
traffic mitigation fees).
22. Project shall be redesigned to include no more than 72 units to the
satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services.
llill
Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed and approved
in conformance with the sign Ordinance for on- and off-site subdivision
signs.
LANDSCAPING
1. The entire site shall be fully landscaped including the highest slope on
the site (west of Yankton Drive). Special attention shall be given to
revegetation of the existing steep sandstone slopes adjacent to Poway
Road.
2. A revised landscape concept plan which addresses the revegetation of the
slopes adjacent to Poway Road shall be submitted and approved by the
Planning Department prior to submittal of detailed plans.
3. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and
approved by the Planning Services Department prior to the issuance of
building permits. The landscape plans shall be prepared as a separate
set of plans and plan check and inspection fees shall be paid in
accordance with Resolution No. 89-77 prior to issuance of building
permi ts.
4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed
in accordance with the City of Poway Ordinance and shall be planted at
an average of every 30 feet on interior streets and 20 feet on exterior
streets.
5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes,
shall be provided within the development; 20% - 24" box or larger, 70% -
15 gallon, and 10% - 5 gallon to the satisfaction of the Director of
Planning Services and in accordance with the approved landscape plan in
all multifamily and PRO projects.
6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving
condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
7. All landscape plans and landscape development will conform to the City
of Poway Guidelines to Landscape Development and City of Poway Landscape
Standards.
AUG 1 1995 ITEM q
8 of 17
- -
Resolution No. P-
Page 6
8. The project shall annex into the appropriate Landscape Maintenance
District prior to final map approval.
RECREATION
The developer shall pay the Park Fee at the established rate at the date
of final inspection, or the date of the Certificate of Occupancy,
whichever occurs later but a security deposit shall be posted prior to
may approval.
ADDITIONAL APPROVALS REOUIRED
1. The developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the
sales office at all times, and/or suitable alternative to the
satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services.
2. When public or private equestrian/pedestrian trails are required as a
part of the subdivision, the developer shall display a map in the sales
office, of said subdivision, indicating the trails.
3. All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public
shall include but not be limited to trails, future and existing schools,
parks, and streets.
4. the developer shall provide a noise display board in the sales office to
the satisfaction of the Planning Services Director. The display shall
include the site plan and noise study.
5. Working drawings shall include a certification by a recognized
acoustical expert that the requirements of the City of Poway's noise
ordinance will be met.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. any open space easement within the development shall be dedicated to the
City. The offer of dedication and the acceptance thereof shall be noted
on the final map.
2. The entrance and exit on Poway Road shall provide adequate stopping
sight distance for a 50 MPH design speed and have a grade no steeper
than six percent in the first 20 feet from Poway Road with a maximum
grade of 12 percent. The entrance shall be paved to 16 feet with an
additional four feet of "grasscrete" to provide 20 feed of unobstructed
access for emergency vehicles. A four foot strip of "grasscrete" shall
be provided between the entrance and exit up to the intersection with
the interior driveway and a conspicuous sign posted to prevent exits
through the entrance.
9 of 17 AUG 1 1995 ITEU 9
-~--
Resolution No. P-
Page 7
GRADING
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform
Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, approved grading plan and
geotechnical report, and accepted grading practices. The 80 foot slope
west of La Venta Shall be contoured and rounded wherever feasible.
2. The grading plan shall contain a certificate signed by a registered
civil engineer that the grading plan has preserved a minimum of 100
square feet of solar access for each dwelling unit and for each future
building site within the subdivision.
3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the
State of California to perform such work at first submittal of a grading
plan.
4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or
geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan
check.
5. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the
Planning Services and Public Services Department and shall be completed
prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of
building permit, whichever comes first.
6. A pre-blast survey of surrounding property shall be conducted to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to any rock blasting. Seismic
recordings shall be taken for all blasting and blasting shall occur only
at locations and levels approved by the City Engineer.
STREETS AND SIDEWALKS
1. Replace, to City of Poway standards, any broken concrete curb, gutter,
and sidewalk along the project's frontage on Poway Road and Carriage
Road. Replacement shall be completed prior to issuance of a building
certificate of occupancy.
2. Street lights per City of Poway standards shall be installed along the
project's frontage on Poway Road and Carriage Road and shall be
completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Locations
for said lights shall be as designated by the city after the applicant
provides the city's Public Services Department. A plot plan showing the
locations of existing street lights along Poway Road and Carriage Road
within a 500 foot radius from the development's boundary.
3. A raised concrete median shall be constructed in Carriage Road; the
design of which shall be as approved by the City Engineer and shall
match the stamped concrete medians in Poway Road. It shall be completed
prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
10 of 17 AUG 1 1995 neM 9
- -
--
Resolution No. P-
Page 8
4. Improvement plans for street and any other public utility lines (i.e.,
sewer, water, street lights, and drainage) that my be required, shall be
prepared and submitted to the City's Public Services Department for
review and shall meet the City Engineer's approval with required
securities posted and standard agreement for construction executed prior
to map approval.
5. Vehicular access rights to Circulation Element roads shall be dedicated
to the City of Poway except driveway openings approved by the City and
labeled on the final map to the satisfaction of the Director of Public
Services or by separate document.
6. All damaged off-site public works facilities, including parkway trees,
shall be repaired or replaced prior to exoneration of bonds and
improvements, to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Services
or by separate document.
7. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, a right-
of-way permit shall be obtained from the Public Services office and
appropriate fees paid, in addition to any other permits required.
8. The developer shall pay one half the cost of a City approved landscaped
-- median along the project's Poway Road frontage(s) prior to final map
approval. (Amount to pay shall be calculated at $25.43 per lineal
foot).
9. The developer shall pay the Traffic Mitigation Fee at the established
rate at the date the final inspection or the date the Certificate of
Occupancy is issued, whichever occurs later but a security deposit shall
be posted prior to map approval.
10. On street parking shall be prohibited along the projects Carriage Road
frontage.
11. The Transportation Task Force shall be asked to review the desirability
of adding a deceleration lane for west-bound traffic entering the
driveway on Poway Road and the recommendation of the Task Force shall be
incorporated into the project.
DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL
1. The developer shall prOVide permanent off-site drainage improvements to
City standards for La Venta Drive drainage through the project south
under Poway Road and continuing south to Rattlesnake Creek at Community
Park.
2. Intersection drains will be required at locations specified by the
Director of Public Services and in accordance with standard engineering
practices.
11 of 17 AUG 1 1995 ITEM 9
--
Resolution No. P-
Page 9
3. A drainage system capable of handling and disposing of all surface water
originating within the subdivision, and all surface waters that my flow
onto the subdivision from adjacent lands, shall be required. Said
drainage system shall include any easements and structures as required
by the Director of Public Services to properly handle the drainage.
4. Portland cement concrete cross gutters shall be installed where water
crosses the roadways.
5. The Master Plan of Drainage Fee shall be paid at the established rate in
accordance with the Drainage Ordinance at the date of final inspection
or at the date the certificate of occupancy is issued, whichever occurs
later, but a security deposit shall be posted prior to map approval.
6. Concentrated flows across driveways and/or sidewalks shall not be
permitted.
UTILITIES
1. A 20 foot wide easement for new water main lines within the project
which are not in public street rights-of-way shall be dedicated to the
City of Poway. The offer of dedication and the acceptance thereof shall
be made on the final map.
2. The applicant shall extend the water distribution system through the
project by connecting the La Vent a Drive water main with the Carriage
Road water main.
3. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground
including existing electrical utilities less than 34.5 KV along
Circulation Element roads and/or highways.
4. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving
utility companies and the Director of Public Services.
5. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation and undergrounding
of existing public utilities, as required.
6. Water, sewer, and fire protection systems plans shall be designed and
constructed to meet requirements of the City of Poway and the Health
Department of the County of San Diego.
7. Prior to acceptance of property for sewer service, annexation to the
sewer improvement area shall occur.
8. The applicant shall pay for a water system analysis to establish the
proper size and location for the public water system. The amount wi 11
be determined by the cost of the analysis and shall be paid upon demand
by the city.
AUG 1 1995 ITEM 9
12 of 17
Resolution No. P-
Page 10
9. The applicant shall, within 30 days after receiving approval of the
tentative tract map, and development review, apply for a Letter of
Availability (lOA) to reserve sewerage availability and post with the
City, a nonrefundable reservation fee equal to 20$ of the appropriate
sewerage connection fee in effect at the time the LOA is issued.
10. Developer shall construct a light system conforming to city of Poway
Standards at no cost to the public, subject to the following:
a. Cut-off luminaries shall be installed which will provide true 90
degree cutoff and prevent projection of light above the horizontal
from the lowest point of the lamp or light emitting refractor or
device.
b. All fixtures shall use a clear, low pressure sodium vapor light
source.
c. Advance energy charges and District engineering charges shall be
paid by the developer.
d. Annexation to the lighting district shall be accomplished and
evidence of annexation shall be accomplished at the time of final
..-. inspection or certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs later.
11. Cable television services shall be provided and installed underground.
The developer shall notify the Cable company when trenching for
utilities is to be accomplished.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE SAFETY SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. New fire hydrants to be installed within the project at locations to be
determined by the city fire Marshal, maximum spacing will be every 300
feet.
2. Access roadway for fire apparatus shall be designated as fire lanes with
appropriate signs and curb markings.
3. Roof covering shall meet Class A fire retardant testing as specified in
the Uniform Building Standards No. 32-7 for fire retardant roof.
4. Approved numbers of addresses shall be placed on the building in such a
position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street fronting
the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background.
Minimum height of address numbers shall be four inches. Address may be
required at private driveway entrances.
5. Each chimney used in conjunction with any fireplace shall be maintained
with a spark arrester.
6. Plans for each model home shall be submitted to and approved by the
Department of Safety Services prior to construction.
AUG 1 1995 ITEM 9 .
3 of 17
---- -- ----- ----------
--------------..- -----
Resolution No. P-
Page 11
7. A Knox Security System Box and padlocks shall be required for each
building and post indicator valve.
8. Fire department access for use of heavy fire fighting equipment shall be
provided to the immediate job construction sites at the start of
construction and maintained at all times until construction is
completed.
9. Access roadways for fire apparatus shall be designated as fire lanes
with appropriate signs and curb markings.
10. Prior to delivery of combustible building materials on site, water and
sewer systems shall satisfactorily pass all required tests and be
connected to the public water and sewer systems. In addition, the first
lift of asphalt paving shall be in place to provide adequate, permanent
access for emergency vehicles. The final lift of asphalt shall not be
installed until all other construction activity has been substantially
completed to the satisfaction of the City.
GENERAL REOUIREMENTS AND APPROVALS
1. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) and/or
Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association shall be subject
to the review for compliance with conditions herein, to the satisfaction
of the city Attorney and Director of Planning Services, and shall be
filed with the Secretary of State, the County Recorder and the City
Clerk at the time of final map consideration.
2. Final parcel and tract map shall conform to City standards and
procedures.
3. By separate document prior to the recording of the final subdivision
map, or on the final subdivision map, there shall be granted to the
City, an open space easement over common areas as shown on the tentative
map. Said open space easement shall be approved as to form by the City
Attorney.
4. Should this subdivision be further divided, each final map shall be
submitted for approval by the Director of Public Services.
5. All provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance of the Poway Municipal Code
shall be met as they relate to the division of land.
6. The tentative map approval shall expire on September 12, 1991.
Application for time extension must be received 90 days prior to
expiration in accordance with the City's Subdivision Ordinance.
AUG 1 1995 ITEM 9
14 of 17
- ,-
Resolution No. P-
Page 12
--
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Poway, State of
California, this 1st day of August, 1995.
Don Higginson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marjorie K. Wahlsten, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
-
I, Marjorie K. Wahlsten, City Clerk of the City of Poway, do hereby
certify, under the penalty of perjury, that the foregoing Resolution, No.
, was duly adopted by the City Council at a meeting of said City
Council held on the day of , 1995, and that it was so
adopted by the followrng-vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Marjorie K. Wahlsten, City Clerk
City of Poway
,-
15 of 17 AUG 1 1995 ITEM 9
------..---------------
OS-A
R
R
-
A
"'-,
--
CITY OF POW A Y ITEM: TTM 89-06 AR
@ SCALE, TITLE: ZONING & LOCATION
NONE A TT ACHMENT : B
16 of 17
AUG 1 1995
-
- ./
~I Si
DRIVE EX 8~ SEt-VER. ~ ~' I
~. ':1
- EX/Sr 4"W/9rER ~----.--- - ---~
~
~ FO.,O 'cE (i ~ ~
I I
i FF 5393
I P?.cr' :
__J I U~,:JU . I I'l:
__.--J
.."."'-J
_(~C) EX CprCI-/8"L9S//Y /52C)
, EX 5D TOBE--REMOVE.D
d3/.?3' EX ~~DiA.FDITCH ;'
,~ ' ,
,- ------4,\.-- -=r- \
10 \
~... ~Z" \ ,
~ V- " II- 1 (). I
~':", <;1-~"~ I
" I ,,' 1 '
<l\ I U1
5210 .,"-' , , "- i 1
\J J It
:;15 i '( I t I
I
'" J l)- I U
~ I ~-
\[) ~'
- Ie I ~ ! I"
III I .
GF5/7,'?'J ., J t:: i; , I
---'1'-14' &FS'74 I
- -1 I L ' ,
J ---1 1 (
,
i '.
"
~ ,
, r
\ -
-- --
I~
5HT TURN OvL>' fB""""'''',e,(' " ,
EX CUR{3 OUTLE T E
\ 8',5EJo/~-' \ \
SEC! 'tEFrTz.k,'Z:;;E4=tb:~JlC::<O'C!/~"YJTf'P)-:? \ ,~ \ ---
.1 _____
CITY OF POWAY ITEM: TTM 89-06 AR
@ TITLE: PARTIAL SITE PLAN
-
SCALE: NONE A TT ACHMENT : c
, - of 17
. I
AUG 1 1995 ITEM 9
- ----------_._---------~-
.-'0.. JJ~A:e( 7-,~/-f~
j ~' etuk
,- 'P/AIJN/'1
134 I 1 Starridge Street
Poway, CA 92064
July 31,1995
~ND DEUVEREO
The Honorable Don Higginson and Members of the City Council DATE '7 - 3(. <1 ,
The City of Poway
Dear Mayor Higginson and Members of the City Council~
RE: City Council Meeting August I, 1995, Agenda Item # 9
One fundamental quality of life in Poway is the opportunity to walk throughout our city,
It is a physical connection individuals have with their communities, Pedestrian access is a
quality of life issue supported by the General Plan and the Poway Road Specific Plan, What
community values or standards are upheld when the City Council allows development to close an
existing pedestrian walkway, change its route, delay its construction and finally delete it
altogether?
The property at Carriage and Poway Roads was open space for many years. With the
townhome development and city approval process, the first proposed alignment of the path
skirted the property to the east alongside Wendy's and was changed at the developer's request. I
.--- opposed this change at the time. The city obtained an easement to align the walkway through the
townhome development and approved delaying construction until the third phase, Now staff
recommends deletion - changing a change they originalIy approved,
The objections currently raised were all anticipated and brought to city staff and council
attention before the alignment change, The steepness of the slope was increased with the new
alignment and objections from future townhome residents were obvious, In 1990, I spoke to the
Nexus developer who openly said he did not want to construct the pathway, and I mentioned this
in my October 30, 1990 letter to Mayor Higginson regarding the extended closure of Starridge
walkway, To decrease concerns from the older homeowners on La Venta, there is more control
over a designated walkway than the open space that existed before development.
As with the years of problems before resolving Starridge walkway, this deletion repeats
the process of closing an existing pathway, reversing city decisions, inadequate staff projections
and objections from new residents brought in by the actual development that closed the pathway
in the beginning. Development should not be allowed to delete existing pedestrian routes.
I urge the City Council to maintain the prior decision, the existing easement, and its
requirement that the developer construct the pathway now.
Sincerely,
~Au2~
- Susan W, Sheldon
\ Enclosure
AUG 1 1995 ITEM 9 rl
.
10 : ~l~~Q~i t~~]1j ~~,~ i-~J," i .,1,'8-
CD
CD ... ~riiJ!l e' ...s,5 ~
... Q;) :II e ......... Q, QJ
.. . ]_0CC00 8j ~- ~~c 0~! JJ! ic~~lj~ i f=
C'il .. ~ ~,~'-~.l:: f 0" - ~ ~
"0 ~co: 1::..... -eO ""-- ~~ .... i ~~c= s ;~
~ . . . ~ .... '8 t! = "Q c = ~ - ,!O .~~~ ~ '~J~"o" j ~~
- o e g>8~ p '0 ~'E ~.!!'Ii ~~~
= S j.,!~~ ~] ~t~~ ~~~
... f!I~I!1 IJ~lIJ ~ti
~ "' 'l; i ~ ~ 11 - .8'" ., ,- ..; ~
. Ui4J&. ~- fo"5~m~="E:::&'5
... . Ie i! .... ~ ~:s;: "0 ~-8 ~ fn i"5 i
Cl -1""""1 r'!~~t~ :*~~~~I~:gb~
0 ""'I .!j.B" 0'.;:l .,J!] .'-".,2
:11 i ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~i~::!';1 H~ ~~~-JI ~~~~l~~'I.s~~
]""ocl"~~ ~0S -~o ~~p~~~ lt~~~~e=~~eJ
3~e~ =ci~.! !~~1 -~ I '~I~~ ~"O~~~ ~SQ,~4J~
"5~~"O~ .5~-0!i~'a~~ sr~ Jli1! >.... Il ~~'" :S""Il" ~.!lI
~ ~.i1~~~l~t5~'~ ~il~!]i !~,,~l: je~c!~]~!~]t
fn 4J _~~fn ~ ~=
i~.] h 0 g E! l:~! @1l ~~-;
e ..c 0 'ij C ,- .. .,... = ., e j '" _ . t:
~ B.... ~~.!Q~ 8~.!! '~8 ~ ~~ ... :!!1Ul"'''']=!!i ..t:-~"':c ;.!j.!!l.
en ".c~'S... 0 iJ~ 'a=:"C.,Cl ..c~ ftI ~"" r.;~:S~ =H"B~ ~,!l1~'B ~~:!S
-~ ~~.~....~<~"O ~...~=~~ '~il ]~g~ ! 8a!~] ~-~~
J!:!!~e ~; ~:!!.P~~ .ae_
~ c_ .0 I' t.I ~:t' IllI I cri
00. 8 J! C) """2 i lJ >.... :s ~ t,)" ~ Go> >'31 e >. '" > c{, ~ l:Ifl >. V' c
.cf... 'co-~ ~=:a -l.s' . -,> G,) .5=:~ :.=c..o, "I
~ t.I -...u ....-c "0" .ct.l. ._~
J ~~jj~ 11~~ l~~ fg.:il ~i~l!~ ~,i~ !~l~ e~
~ 1l;"1l ~..o ~eo ......~., ~e;!S'''- "0 S"'ll= ....,
>. 0'} :I... ca ~ "0 G'} E 'ii "0 8"0 I - J2 0'} .!! ca - >'-.8 ~.:::
:::l Q;) el:~~ii ~1ll:lEl ~~c ~;-g 1!~.,~g~ ~lr!~ ';;;~t!c ~!!
e: 'a ot~:s . .~ :: 1;) 0 ~ ; 0'} =- a:!! '-8 g.5 ~"' ft; ':l ~ ~ -Q ~ .- ~ 8-
~ ..ll ~ ., 0 J! ~ >. ~ ~ ., .!! ~ . J!. ~ "'... ~ :l:i '" == ~._., ~ .,..
~ CI .e./:: ..c.!j 'l; l: S ., J'" &- ~..../:: :!S ~ - t! '" ..c== = :!!
.- . iC~;'~ cf := _~e 8...si=!5:P'l:"~ ,I;j:;g'c ~~.s~ ='i
~ E c: 3i = <= "I m ,g l! (; ~ :l j = .~ ~ ~ i '" 1 ., ~ '" g.., ~ ..c '" ,5 ,5 0 ~
-~"e o_~@ ~~ Ji".l::~~~~ ~t~ ~e... ~..~~ n~
~ .e .~ ~~~J! ~ c.ac~ ~I.s.. t~~8~e~02~ ~~; :~~j ~~
:::l ii f~~~1 &1 ~~ ~li .!i.s.U 15 ~e~I~.8 t! ~.=~ ~n ~ !r~!i 0 R;
c .-
- ~ 0 'I:: c... - ~ - R. . ~ ,,>. ~ - - f! - e" ... ~ c
~ lJ f~ il"".,J!~..o ~~] :0~J!~;~ le~CJ!~~1 o.sj'" 0"
~ -~ ~~~~'O;i~:s~~ ]e~=- "iitj~~lc.s<~-~~ -=~~b:E~
l:l i~J]~i~~ Sl~lj~ el h-= ~ Ulg~'~jit~:Sj-e ~~~! .;~!
~
~ .. ~oo >. ~.... .,., ~~"' C~~~]g..c<
.a - e e ., "" ,!!l .. 0 .5 g ~ - ~ ~= ,,_ :S.s 0 l:l 8 t ~ >. rl ,g 'Ii
~ Q;) - l:l" , ,
Eo.; J..4 "'.:!!i Co ",'_ ~>. ~ ~ 0 ........ 'I::
I~ ~'''" -rl1 ~.,"'~ - 0~~ ~..-..co
o ~ C ~e~~~ ~E~.! Bra= C-S' ~i'~; ,l:l~& "f.ri~:
.. ~ ~ · 0 3&i~" -"E i' ~1! ~ 1 >.~ ~'ij ., c
s fl~UfiJ m~! !Hf.~&U n~ i:Hi1H~to.
~ ': ~ -~I!,ll ll~i"a ~!1~.8~!~~ ~!~ lfi'~~u';i~1
~, gc~ :SO! ~ I Ks~ 1llil 0.5C ~c~u a~'
&S I~U~U~ghhi ~lHdlil f!i ~iinb,l,
~= i 11!,aj 'Ji~~ U]~ l r~i ~d: &~.~!}I i "~fjj;.
.. \ ~ i!. ~~ JU!jim!fUji!hm !lli~iil~
, . :;.. ",' 4..-1 ,J 'il c ~ Rl:l~IIl,. 50S il!i~j~~..ca or" j ~J!
-< ~.- "Cl_ C U _.cO'} O'}G) ..... _itftl_
---.----
;!}~ ?-1-7 s-
o" 7/31/95 RECEIVI::D
JUl 3 1 1995
Stephen Macleod
13308 LaVenta Drive PLANNING DEPT,
Poway, CA, 92064
Re: Public hearing on 8/1/95,
Dear City Counsel,
I am a home owner at the aforementioned address and I strongly oppose having a
pedestrian walkway connecting the subject project to La Venta, Connecting Carriage
Road Townhomes with La Venta Drive will have an adverse impact on all of the adjoining
homeowners, The proposed walkway will create an unsafe congregating area for
unsupervised children,
Respectfully Yours,
_ _~/c;~)(-!t1l'- ~
)
-Stephen Macleod
LaVenta Drive Homeowner
GG.' ~
--
lUG 1 1995 ITEM 9 tot