Item 12 - Hillside/Ridgeline MDR 95-22 Linda Snyder
- -
AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
-" TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James L. Bowersox, City Ma~ ~~
INITIATED BY: John D. Fitch, Assistant City Managef1; f
Reba Wright-Quastler, Director of Planning Services ~
DATE: August 15, 1995
SUBJECT: Hillside/Ridgeline Minor Development Review 95-22, Linda Snyder, Applicant.
ABSTRACT
A request for approval to perform additional grading on a residential lot located at
14652 Sunset Mountain Way within the Rural Residential B zone.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project is not subject to CEQA.
FISCAL IMPACT
~
None.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Notice was mailed to 8 immediately adjacent property owners.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve Minor Development Review 95-22 subject
to the conditions contained in the attached proposed resolution.
ACTION
',. ,.~
-
1 of 9 AUG 1 5 1995 ITEM 12
- AGENDA REPOR'l
CITY OF POW A Y
This report is included on the Consent Calendar. There will be no separate discussion of the report prior to epproval by the
City Council unless members of the Council, staff or public request it to be removed from the Consent Calendar and
discussed separately. If you wish to have this report pulled for discussion, please fill out a slip indicating the report number
and give it to the City Clerk prior to the beginning of the City Council meeting.
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James L. Bowersox, City Man~ ..^
INITIATED BY: John D. Fitch, Assistant City Manager't)~ Ll
Reba Wright-Quastler, Director of Planning Services ~
Carol Rosas, Assistant Planner II
DATE: August IS, 1995
MANDATORY
ACTION DATE: September 15, 1995
SUBJECT: Hillside/Ridaeline Minor Develooment Review 95-22. Li nda
Snvder. Aoolicant: A request for approval to perform
additional grading on a residential lot located at 14652
Sunset Mountain Way within the Rural Residential B zone.
APN: 278-280-32, 33
BACKGROUND
On July 16, 1991 the City Council approved Conditional Use Permit 91-07 and Minor
Development Review 91-19 on the subject property permitting the construction of
a 6,000 square foot two story residence and a 1,264 square foot detached
accessory apartment. The residence was completed in May 1993 and to date the
accessory apartment has not been constructed.
The applicant is requesting approval to conduct additional grading on the site
to provide better access to the garage and more level area to site a swimming
pool. The area that is to be graded will impact a visually prominent knoll. A
condition of approval for CUP 91-07 and MDRA 91-19 required that future grading
of the hillside portions of the subject lot be approved by the City Council.
FINDINGS
The 8.58 acre property is located on a prominent ridgeline east of Espola Road.
The two-story residence is sited in a "saddle" between two knolls and is visible
from some vantage points along Espola Road. In March 1995 the City issued the
applicant a "Stop Work Notice" for grading work that was being undertaken on the
ACTION:
2 of 9 J
'"\
- -
Agenda Report
August 15, 1995
Page 2
site which required a grading permit. Approximately 3-4 feet of the upper
portion of a knoll located southwest of the residence was graded. Engineering
and Planning staff advised the applicant that a grading permit would be required
to complete the work she desired and to perform the required remedial work on the
site.
The grading plan has been designed to reconstruct the top of the knoll which was
disturbed, to push back an existing 14 foot high manufactured slope away from the
house to allow the development of a wider driveway area near the garage, and to
extend the rear yard terrace area out to provide more room to develop a pool.
The project will result in the removal of approximately 4,000 square feet of
coastal sage habitat. The applicant proposes to mitigate the removed coastal
sage through dedication of an open space easement over a portion of the site
containing coastal sage scrub. The area that is to be dedicated as open space
is adjacent to land designated as open space and which also contains coastal sage
habitat (See Attachment D).
The proposed grading is consistent with the goals and strategies listed in the
General Plan for hillside development and is consistent with the standards listed
in the Grading Ordinance. Staff therefore recommends approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act in that
it is grading associated with the development of accessory structures including
a swimming pool and the widening a driveway.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Notice was mailed to 8 immediately adjacent property owners.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve Minor Development Review 95-22
subject to the conditions contained in the attached proposed resolution.
JLB:RWQ:CMR:JDF:kls
Attachments:
- A. Proposed Resolution
B. Zoning and Location Map
C. Grading Plan
D. Open Space Exhibit
AUG 1 5 1995 ITEM 12 ,
3 of 9
RESOLUTION NO. P-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA
APPROVING MINOR DEVELOPMENT 95-22 (HILLSIDE/RIDGELINE)
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 278-280-32, 33
WHEREAS, Minor Development Review 95-22 (Hillside/Ridgeline), submitted by
Linda Snyder, applicant, requests approval to perform additional grading on a
residential lot located at 14652 Sunset Mountain Way within the Rural Residential
B zone; and
WHEREAS, on August 15, 1995 the City Council held a duly advertised public
hearing to solicit comments from the public, both pro and con, relative to this
application.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1: Environmental Findinas:
Minor Development Review 95-22 (Hillside/Ridgeline) is not subject to the
California Environmental Quality Act, in that it is Categorically Exempt Class
3, as the project is gradi ng associ ated with the development of accessory
structures including a swimming pool and the widening of a driveway.
By local ordinance, the areas disturbed in the grading process which contain
Coastal Sage Scrub plant community are to mitigated through the on-s i te
dedication of equal or better Quality habitat, at a 1:1 ratio.
Section 2: Findinas:
1. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan in that it
proposes the additional grading which will allow the development of a
accessory structures on a site which is designated for residential use.
2. That the proposed development will not have an adverse aesthetic, health,
safety or architecturally related impact upon adjoining properties, in
that the grading has been designed to appear natural and minimize visible
impacts. A planting plan will provide for full revegetation of all
visible slopes.
3. That the proposed development is in compliance with the Zoning and Grading
Ordinance, in that it complies with the property development standards of
the RR-B zone.
4. That the proposed development encourages the orderly and harmonious
appearance of structures and property within the City, in that the
surrounding properties consist of large rural residential lots with widely
spaced hillside homesites.
Section 3: Citv Council Decision:
The City Counc il hereby approves Minor Development Review 95-22
(Hillside/Ridgeline) subject to the following conditions:
AUG 1 5 1995 ITEM 12 .
4 of 9
- -
- Resolution No. P-
Page 2
Within 30 days of approval the applicant shall submi tin writ i ng that all
conditions of approval have been read and understood.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS IS REQUIRED. COMPLIANCE SHALL BE
APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES.
SITE DEVELOPMENT
1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved grading plans on
file in the Planning Services Department and the conditions contained
herein.
2. Revised grading plans incorporating all conditions of approval shall be
submitted to the Planning Services Department prior to issuance of grading
permit.
3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of
the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at
the time of grading permit issuance.
4. The westerly and southerly side of the knoll that is to be reconstructed
during the grading project shall be hydroseeded with a coastal sage scrub
hydroseed mix to hasten revegetation. If the hydroseeding is not done
during the rainy season, temporary irrigation shall be provided to ensure
germination. This shall be accomplished prior to grading certification or
March 1, 1996 whichever is first.
5. The grading of the site, specifically the City required reconstruction of
the knoll, shall be completed prior to February 1, 1996.
6. Approximately 4,000 square feet of coastal sage scrub will be removed with
the project. The applicant shall mitigate the removed coastal sage scrub
at a minimum 1:1 ratio prior to grading permit issuance. The mitigation
can be accomplished through approved on-site open space dedication to the
City of Poway, payment of a mitigation in-lieu fee or approved off-site
open space dedication of coastal sage habitat to the City of Poway.
7. Grading and clearing operations within areas containing coastal sage scrub
shall not occur between the months of February and August because that is
the nesting season of the California Gnatcatcher.
8. Future grading of the hillside portions of the subject lot shall be
prohibited unless approved by the City Council.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOllOWING CONDITIONS IS REQUIRED. COMPLIANCE SHALL BE
APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES.
1. A grading plan for the development of the property shall be submitted to
the City's Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior
to issuance of the grading permit and start of grading operation.
AUG 1 5 1995 ITEM 12 I
5 of 9
----------
Resolution No. P-
Page 3
2. Applicable fees and deposits shall be paid prior to grading permit
issuance.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Poway, State of
California, this 15th day of August 1995.
Don Higginson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marjorie K. Wahlsten, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
I, Ma r jori e K. Wah 1 sten, City Cl erk of the City of Poway, do hereby
certify, under the penalty of perjury, that the foregoing Resolution, No.
, was duly adopted by the City Council at a meeting of said City Council
held on the day of , 1995, and that it was so adopted
by the followrng-vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Marjorie K. Wahlsten, City Clerk
City of Poway
AUG 1 5 1995 ITEM 12 j
6 of 9
0 .~
-
~~...\ Z \--- ,1l
'\i'" ~
IT '"
~ /C :..- \..(')! ,
~ ~~y\~' m
~~,::r t---1~ >V
..j I ..- . ...-- 'l
. ~ " ~7
.~~~ 7 ~~~
; r< ::JRI V- ..- ---
'T ~ ~ '-~'- l o~
~\ ':::;-....
V/ l'i / ,y-:::
I -, 1- I
. /t '" SE ....... \: / L
. _\~ ~ f-I ~
1--\ '- \
/'7 '-' H \....V l - 1
VI I-- M ,
\ 1 If- (;.:(<:::'1 ~ 1 r II ~ ~
rg[~ "'IiJY'"' f~'- ,,/I /~
iK '. l.}~ T ~ .-/
(,"-1 "/ /T \ ~ ~ ~)- ~
I I I ff ~r l I f-J r r-+ I I I
CITY OF POW A Y ITEM: MDRA 95-22
ZONING AND
- ~ SCALE, TITLE: LOCATION MAP
NONi" ATTACHMENT: R
7 of 9 .AUG 151995 ITEM 12
\
- --- - ._---.~-_.-~.._-------_. .-. -. -- --------
:J:.~
v.
~ ....,: ,'~"i !,>,"v"
~
-- ~
'l' t~ I~ ~rr~ ·
,,11
ii~ \ "
.' ~ I ~.
, I I ~ !
. ~. / " I ;
"'r" \O..~ '.
I,' . .-" .,' - · ., '
_~. :H~!l 'E'." '1 ~H
I~~.' I.~ I
, r .- ·
l'~ .I I ~ ~ l ..
{\ . ~ ' h ~ ~ · !
I J II Is 1.1 i~
~ ~ (I" ',I ~
l~ ,I" !.' i
. -, +~.
a' - i,
-' .
. 0
r. .--'---"-
~ ,---
. ,- ~
, --, '::-:::\"
, I ~ \
/ ;~: l~'~ \
c.. / .~! ~. --,
. /. ~ .
j.... ,. ..' ~
, ~,-. \ ~ ",.
.' '.;,', c<, ~-I
, / i/~-"" i,.:- :;) ~ - -' l" I
! ;-' _~. 7~""~' .1',~ '
,_;,.......c~~~~>:'.,.:" ", '., I
, ',. '.. ." ,,'/1 ,. ~ ,) \ .
~ .. '.~ ,<,.< .'<"<,'. ..... . I
Lf'l _ >_.,-' ,_,: \ '-c 'c".""'" \ ;; . . "
~ .' . ..~....-..., "",. .... ....
.... . ..... _, .. _. v .' . ." ." .
II /" ,\' . ...,,,i,;._ ,. ,. .'\,'-1"\. . .r: ;,
&11 . '~. . '---:';.';:. . -. ." ~ ",II
~ '0 " . ""-, ., . u,
_ Q) . " c.-. ' ...,' n .,
0:: I U) ,,' -. .' e . .' ^'
::J 0. ' .., '.~ '
E-< 8. /~. . ,,,,,j: \..-', \ ..
Ul .",,' , . . ,-, .
o ,,' .
a ~ / "
Q .,,; +' .' --;, ~
~ ,...__~ ..;}o'\" .
E-<Ol ' :: . -.
~.~ / ,. .
u" L>
~ Q) L ""..\ .' k h' . .
"""'4 _~ .,' '4 I' t-.~, to-1L..:
U 0.. ~.' ._'.'..., .)""..,--,,' .'
. -
,/ #'
'.:7/;' ......
. .
" .'-
~.
...........,.-
.-
, of c A TT ACHMENi. C
- -
- " .
7f!/~S8 . ....,.
S -.sI"",4- ..., ,"55
40' ~
0 3LStJ I
J
)
J . .;;
, ~ I
- - .~
. .. &
.
..~ t- .,
e
:'" '. ,
'\ .. , '"
;; \..
~j '''!\. '-
~
-iT. I @ ,~ ~
~
2.441AC ,; .~.
,
.~'
tP
.
~'4 0/ 4' ,
\ S/<! Z 9
- ::>Mlj30<'.
,~ ____~ 4'~. Z4' __ 7 ..""".
.:.~ ~ CL YDE REXRODE WILDERNESS Nf:A 37" .>::':
. -
;. ~
~\'2. ("'7;-:-::"
';L
, ~.
" .
,~~. ~
&{ 1
0 ,
SHT 2 \tV \
.
- 4 39 AC ,
PAR 2
ll.\~Io(.
-('I"
Ill' - -:L11"'''z :-t..L.::.E - -
rf4 CO" /.,.t."'.J." - -
~ ~
. n,
~~,l-,\,~.':. ~.:::~: : II.%'IoS~ ~,
,",'
-~
-' '_~; ~.,'C'....,-_ ~~ ...:<!iF... .",.. ~~
'_'," ,'C.~>-,_"""".,. ,--.
,..,i.~~,~:,,--.>. ~ SITE
. . ,.
.,,, -
...
~ -.,
MORA 95-22
CITY OF POWAY ITEM .
.
ZONING AND
~ TITLE : LOCATION MAP
-
SCALE: NONE ATTACHMENT: D
~ of 9 AUG 1 5 1995 ITEM 12 .