Item 6 - EA CUP 95-06 Airtouch Cellular
- -
AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
- TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James L. Bowersox, City Man~ ~^
INITIATED BY: John D. Fitch, Assistant City Manage~rt
Reba Wright-Quastler, Director of Plan ing Services~
DATE: August 22, 1995
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 95-06, Airtouch
Cellular, Applicant
ABSTRACT
A request to construct a cellular telecommunications facility at 14264 Tierra Bonita
Road, at the top of Kent Hill, in the RR-C/RR-A zone.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Staff recommends the issuance of a Negative Declaration with mitigation in the area of
aesthetics.
FISCAL IMPACT
~ None.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Public notice was published in the Poway News Chieftain and mailed to 19 property owners
within 500 feet of the project boundaries.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council issue a Negative Declaration with mitigation and
approve Conditional Use Permit 95-06, subject to the conditions contained in the
attached proposed resolution.
ACTION
'\" , .."" I
.-
1 of 16 AUG 2 2 1995 ITEM 6 '. ,,~
- AGENDA REPOR'~
CITY OF POW A Y
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James l. Bowersox, City Man~
INITIATED BY: John D. Fitch, Assistant City Managerc1r~ ~
Reba Wright-Quastler, Director of Planning Service
Marijo Van Dyke, Associate Planner
DATE: August 22, 1995
MANDATORY
ACTION DATE: September 12, 1995
SUBJECT: Envi ronmenta 1 Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 95-06,
Airtouch Cellular, Applicant: A request to construct a
cellular telecommunications facility at 14264 Tierra Bonita
Road, at the top of Kent Hill, in the RR-C/RR-A zone.
APN: 321-191-11
BACKGROUND
Cellular communications companies are seeking locations throughout Poway and
surrounding communities in which to locate communications apparatus which will
improve service, especially in areas of diverse topography.
FINDINGS
The project consists of a 140 square foot telecommunications facility including
an unmanned building and a cellular antenna system, up to 10 directional panel
antennas, six omni directional whip antennas and two digital dish antennas. This
equipment will be located on the westerly side of an existing microwave receiving
dish operated by Cox Cable T.V. which is west of the existing single family home.
The area on top of the knoll is slightly recessed and screened on the southwest
by some large boulders.
The maximum height to the top of the panel antennas is 20 feet; and 15 feet to
the top of the two digital dish antennas. The top of the tallest element in the
array will not exceed the height of the top of the existing Cox Cable dish.
ACTION:
2 of 16 UG 2 2 1995 .0 ...
- -
- Agenda Report
August 22, 1995
Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Staff has completed an Initial Environmental Study and has determined that the
only probable area of adverse impact is within the category of Aesthetics. The
subject equipment can be viewed from the valley floor along segments of Poway
Road, Community Road north of Hilleary Park, on Twi n Peaks Road eastbound
approaching Community Road, and along short segments of Midland Road in the Old
Poway area. Recommended mi t i gat i on will include installation of planting
materials which will be installed and maintained near the top of the north, south
and west facing slopes to ensure adequate screening. Staff recommends the
issuance of a Negative Declaration with mitigation in the area of aesthetics.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Public notice was published in the PO'llay News Chieftain and mailed to II
_. property owners within 500 feet of the project boundaries.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council issue a Negative Declaration with
mitigation and approve Conditional Use Permit 95-06. subject to the conditions
contained in the attached proposed resolution.
JLB:JDF:RWQ:MVD:kls
Attachments:
A. Proposed Resolution
B. Initial Study
C. Negative Declaration
D. Proposed Site Plan
E. Proposed Elevations
-
3 of 16 AUG 2 2 1995 ITEM 6 ....
RESOLUTION NO. P-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-06
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 321-191-11
WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit 95-06, submitted by Airtouch Cellular,
Applicant, for the purpose of erecting a cellular telecommunications facility at
14264 Tierra Bonita Road, at the top of Kent Hill; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has read and considered the application and has
considered other evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1: Environmental Findinos:
The City Council finds that Conditional Use Permit 95-06 will not result
in any significant impact on the environment and hereby issues a Negative
Declaration with Mitigation Measures.
Section 2: Findinos:
1. The approved project is consistent with the general plan in that
semi-public facilities are permitted to be located in all zones if
regulated by a conditional use permit.
2. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of
the project will be compatible with and will not adversely affect or
be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings,
structures, or natural resources, in that the facil ity will be
located on the west side of Kent Hill, which is distant from any
adjoining homes. The facility is self contained and needs minimal
maintenance, resulting in very few vehicle trips per year.
3. That the harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density is compatible
with adjacent uses, in that the facility will not exceed the height
of a single-family home, nor the height of an adjOining Cox Cable
microwave dish, and can be screened from view by landscaping and
existing boulders on the property.
4. That there are available public facilities, services and utilities
for the project.
5. That there will not be harmful effect upon desirable neighborhood
characteristics, in that servicing of the facility will not be
required more than once per month, therefore vehicle trips will be
minimal.
6. That the generation of traffic will not adversely impact surrounding
streets and/or the City's Circulation Element, as stated in #5
above.
4 of 16 A TT ACHMENT A UG 2 2 1995 ITEMb 0'14
- .-
Resolution No. P-
Page 2
-
7. That the site is suitable for the type and intensity of the use, in
that it is an elevated site which provides adequate line of sight
for the operation of teleconvnunication broadcast and receiving
activities. The top of the hill is level and 1 a rge enough to
accommodate the facility, as well as the installation of adequate
screening materials.
8. That there will not be significant harmful effects upon
environmental qua 11 ty and natural resources, in that the area
proposed for installation is a cleared area which is completely
disturbed.
9. That there are no other relevant negative impacts of the project
which cannot be mitigated.
Section 3: Citv Council Decision:
The City Council hereby approves CUP 95-06 subject to the following
conditions:
1. Within 30 days of approval (1) the applicant shall submit in writing
that all conditions of approval have been read and understood; and
(2) the property owner shall execute a Covenant on Real Property.
2. The use conditionally granted by this permit shall not be conducted
-- in such a manner as to interfere wi th the reasonable use and
enjoyment of surrounding residential and commercial uses.
3. This conditional use permit shall be subject to annual review by the
Director of Planning Services for compliance with the conditions of
approval and to address concerns that may have occurred during the
past year. If the permit is not in compliance with the conditions
of approval, or the Planning Services Department has received
complaints, the required annual review shall be set for a public
hearing before the City Council, to consider modification or
revocation of the use permit.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS IS REQUIRED. COMPLIANCE SHALL BE
APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES.
SITE DEVELOPMENT
1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file
in the Planning Services Department and the conditions contained herein.
2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of
approval shall be submitted to the Planning Services Department prior to
issuance of building permits.
3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of
- the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at
the time of building permit issuance.
S of 16 AUG 2 2 1995 ITEM C M
Resolution No. p-
Page 3
4. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not
issued for this project within two years from the date of project
approval.
LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
1. Complete landscape construction documents shall be submitted to and
approved by the Planning Services Department prior to the issuance of
building permits. Plans shall be prepared in accordance with City of
Poway Guide to Landscape Requirements (latest edition).
2. A Master Plan of the existing on-site trees shall be provided to the
Planning Services Department prior to the issuance of building permits and
prior to grading, to determine which trees shall be retained.
3. Existing on-site trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be
maintained in a horticulturally acceptable manner. Dead, decaying, or
potent ia 11 y dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the
discretion of the Planning Services Department during the review of the
Master Plan of existing on-site trees. Living trees which are approved
for removal shall be replaced on a tree-for-tree basis as required by the
Planning Services Department.
4. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving
condition, free from weeds, trash, and debri s. The trees shall be
encouraged and allowed to retain a natural form. Pruning should be
restricted to maintain the health of the trees and to protect the public
safety. Unnatural or excessive pruning, including topping, is not
permitted.
EXISTING STRUCTURES
1. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current building and
zoning regulations, namely sheds, screens and enclosures, or they shall be
demolished, prior to building permit issuance for this project.
2. All exi st i ng accumulated trash and debri s shall be removed prior to
issuance of building permits on the project.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Poway, State of
California, this 22nd day of August, 1995.
Don Higginson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marjorie K, Wahlsten, City Clerk
6 of 16 AUG 22 1995 ITEM b .~
,,--~.:-~._-- :-------- - -.--. -----_..-._- ._-_.~~--~---- .. .... ..-- -.- -.,. --- -._-- -.-.-. -- -- .----
~. -
CITY OF POWAY
INITIAL STUDY
- ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
DATE: -; - a I -"'T S
APPLICANT: p..; I" +CI.LC~ ~..lll,L..r
FILING DATE: S-al-"'lS LOG NUMBER: GLJ..~ ~5-0"
PROJECT: -fClI"I<....... P...o..lc. r "__Vloo\LL'" ~ ,...-tT";'"
PROJECT LOCATION: 10.4 :H-4 '7i'~~ro.... 1:L Ilih:l..~
I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Fact-based explanations of al I answers are required on attached sheets.)
YES MAYBE NO
-
1. Soils and Geology. Wi I I the proposal have
SIgnIfIcant Impacts in:
a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in
geologic relationships? - - ~
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or ./
burial of the soi I?
- -
c. Change In topography or ground surface
contour intervals? 1
- -
- d, The destruction, covering, or modification
of any unique geologic or physical
features? - ..JL
-
e. Any potential increase in wind or water
erosion of soi Is, affecting either on- or
off-site conditions? .JL
- -
1. Changes in erosion, si Itatlon, or
depos i t ion? - - ..JL
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
mudslides, ground failure, or similar V'
hazards?
- -
2. Hydrologr. WII I the proposal have significant
Impacts In:
a. Changes in currents, or the course In
direction of flowing streams, rivers, or
ephemeral stream channels? - - L
b. Changes In absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of
surface water runoff? - - ~
c. Alterations to the course or flow of
flood waters? e/
-
d. Change In the amount of surface water In
-- any body of water? V
-
e. Discharge Into surface waters, or any alter- V
action of surface water Quality? -
7 of 16 ATTACHMENT B A1JG 22 Il95 ITEM 0 ..,
----- ---- - --~-~---~------------- - -"---
....
.~.._------- ~~------------- ---
Environmental Study Check I 1st
Page 2
YES MAYBE NO
-
f. Alteration of groundwater
characteristics? - - V
g. Change In the quantity of groundwaters,
either through direct additions, or with-
drawals, or through Interference with an
aqu I fer?
Quality? V
Quant I ty? - - ...J.C:
-
h. The reduction In the amount of water otherwise
available for public water supplies? V
- -
i, Exposure of people or property to water V
related hazards such as flooding or seiches? - -
3. Air Qual ity. Wi II the proposal have significant
Impacts In:
a. Constant or periodic air emissions from
mobile or indirect sources? - - V
Stationary sources? - - --1.C
b. Deterioration of ambient air qual ity and/or
Interference with the attainment of appl i-
cable air quality standards? - - L
C. AI terat Ion of local or regional cl imatlc
conditions, affecting air movement moisture V-
or temperature? - -
4. Flora. Will the proposal have significant
results In:
a. Change In the characteristics of species,
Including diversity, distribution, or number V-
of endangered species of plants? - - -
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, V
rare, or endangered species of plants? - - -
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species
of plants Into an area? - ~
d. Reduction In the potential for agricUltural V
production? - - -
5, Fauna. Will the propOsal have significant
results in:
a. Change In the characteristics of species,
Including diversity, distribution, or a/
numbers of any species of animals? - - -
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare, or endangered species of animals? V
-
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species
of animals Into an area, or result In a
barrier to the mitigation or movement of V
animals?
- -
d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish AUG 2 2 1995 ~M 6 'H
8 of 16 or wildlife habitat?
- - - .
----~~,- - -.- .. n _.___9__._ "-~-_. ------_..~ '..-
---~- -------~---"- -"
- -
Environmental Study Checklist
Page 3
.-
YES MAYBE NO
6. Popu I at ion. [Wi II the proposal] have significant
results In:
a. [Wi II the proposal] alter the location, distri-
bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of
the human population of an area? - - ....JtC
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, ./
or create a demand for additlona.l.houslng? - - -
7. Soclo-Economic Factors. Wi II the proposal have
signIficant results In:
a. Change in local or regional soclo-economic
characteristics, including economic or
commercial diversity, tax rate, and prop- V'
erty values? - -
b. Wit I project costs be equitably distri-
buted among project beneficiaries, I.e. , ~
buyers, taxpayers, or project users? - -
8. Land Use and Ptanninq Considerations. Wi II the
proposal have significant results In:
a. A substantial alteration of the present or
- planned land use of an area? V
- - -
b. A conflict with any designations, obJectives,
policies, or adopted plans of any govern- V
mental entitles?
- - -
c. An impact upon the quality or quantity of
existing consumptive or non-consumptive ,/
recreational opportunities? - - -
9. Transportat Ion. Will the proposal have significant
results In:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement? v
- -
b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for
new street construction? V
- - -
c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? .........
- - -
d. Substantial Impact upon existing transpor-
tation systems? V
- -
e. Alterations to present patterns of circu-
lation or movement of people and/or V
goods?
- -
1. Alteration to or effects on present and
- potential water-borne, rail, mass transit,
or air traffic? 1/
- -
g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor ,/
vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? - -
9 of 16 ITEM --
AUG 2 2 1995 6 l'
-.
.. - ---------- ,
Environmental Study Check I 1st
Page 4
YES MAYBE NO
10. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have
sIgnifIcant Impacts In:
a. A disturbance to the Integrity of archaeo-
logical, paleontological, and/or historical ,/
resources?
- -
11. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the
proposal have sIgnIficant results In:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard? V
- -
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards? - V
-
c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances in the event of an accident? - ...Ji:::.
-
d. An increase in the number of individuals or
species of vector or parthenogenic organisms
or the exposure of people to such organisms? - - V
e. Increase in existing noise levels? V
- -
1. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous
noise levels? V
- -
g. The creation of objectionable odors? - - V
h. An increase in I ight or glare? L
- -
12. Aesthetics. Wi II the proposal have. significant
resu Its In:
a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic ../
vista or view?
- - -
b, The creation Of an aesthetically offensive V-
site?
- - -
c. A conflict with the objective of designated
or potential scenic corridors? - - V
13. Uti Iltles and Public Services. Will the proposal
have sIgnIfIcant need for new systems, or alter-
at Ions to the following:
a. Electric power? V
- -
b. Natural or packaged gas? V
- -
c. Commun I ca t Ions systems? I \Ml"rll\.l~V"\e1'-t' .JL
- -
d. Water supply? ./
- - -
e. Wastewater facilities? V
- -
f. Flood control structures? ........
- - -
g. Solid waste facilities? v
- - -
h. Fire protection? v'
10 cf 1E AUG 221995 ITEM 6
II ..
--.- -- -- - -- . . -. ~ -~---~~-~~- .-
"------ --------------- -_.__._------ ------
. - -
.
Environmental Study Checklist
Page 5
-.
YES MAYBE NO
-
I. Pol Ice protection? .......
- -
j. Schoo I s? .r"
- -
k. Parks or other recreational facilities? V
- -
I. Maintenance of public facilities, Including
roads and flood control f ac I I I ties? V
- -
m. Other governmental services? V
- -
14. Energy and Scarce Resources. Wi II the proposal
have significant Impacts In:
a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or ,,/
energy?
- - -
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing V'
sources of energy? - - -
c. An Increase in the demand for development of v"
new sources of energy? - - -
d, An Increase or perpetuation of the consump-
tion of non-renewable forms of energy, when
feasible renewable sources of energy are V
available?
- - -
e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable
or scarce natural resources? JL
- -
15. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
-
a. Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
SUbstantially reduce the habitat of fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or wi Id-
life population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the
number of restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal, or eliminate
Important examples of the major periods V
of the California history or prehistory?
- - -
b. Ooes the project have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-
term Impact on the environment Is one which
occurs In a relatively brief, definitive
period of time while long-term Impacts will V'
endure we II Into the future.) - - -
c. Does the project have Impacts which are
Individually limited, but cumulatively
-- considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
means that the Incremental effects of an
Individual project are considerable when
viewed In connection with the effect of
past projects, and probable future ./
projects. ) - -
11 of H ~UG 2 2 1995 ITEM 6 u ..~
--.--
. .
Environmental Study Check I ist
Page 6
d. Does the project have environmental
effects which wil I cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings. either ./'
directly or indirectly? - - -
II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
(i .e., of aft I rmat Ive answers to the above quest ions plus a discussion Of
proposed mitigation measures.)
I I I .DETER~INATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
G I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION wil I be prepared.
D I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there wi I I not be a significant effect
in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
D I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL I~PACT REPORT is required.
DATE: 7/31 ht5 SIGNATURE:~' V4.-~
I I
TITLE: d..t~I!i"'('~ ....u.-1,....o
FORMS\EIS.FRM
12 of If. AUG 2 2 1995 ITEM b
_.
- .-
- Environmental study Checklist
Page 7
II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
12. will the proposal have significant results in:
a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or
view?
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site?
The antenna array will be visible on the top of Kent Hill
from the north, south and westerly directions.
Mitigation required will be the installation and
maintenance of planting in the form of shrubs and small
trees which will block visibility of the building and as
much of the antennas as possible while allowing for the
efficient operation of the fixtures. .
..-
.-
13 of 16 ~UG 2 2 1995 ITEM 6
---------~
~ POWAY
~ITY OF
DON HIGGINSON, Mayor
SUSAN CALLERY, Deputy Mayor
BOB EMER Y, Councilmember
MICKEY CAFAGNA, Councilmember
BETTY REXFORD, Council member
CITY OF POWAY
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
1. Name and Address of Applicant: Airtouch Cellular 5355 Mira Sorrento Place
#500. San Dieao CA 92121
2. Brief Description of Project: A reauest to construct a cellular telecommunications
facilitvat the followina address: 14264 Tierra Bonita Road.
3. In accordance with Resolution 83-084 of the City of Poway, implementing the
I Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, the City of Poway has determined that
i
the above project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. An
Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
4. Minutes of such decision and the Initial Study prepared by the City of Poway are on
file in the Department of Planning Services of the City of Poway.
5. This decision of the City Council of the City of Poway is final.
Contact Person: Mariio Van Dvke Phone: (619) 679-4294
Approved by: Date:
Reba Wright-Quastler, Ph.D., AICP
ATTACHMENT C AUG" 1995 ITEII 6 j
14 0 f 1E City Hall Located at 13325 Civic Center Drive
@ o....~a~:~::,~~dress: P.O. Box 789. Poway. California 92074-0789 . (619) 748-6600. 695-1400
'~ll.S6. l'~ III C~ Zl'.~ ...." .... lO\. ',. 11I"Jl Sl.'O~ ..... ..__"~~':.'::::..___. . :: .1_ I II:
...~..' ......... .....nrn1~G';\r~~G';\nlOl '. "Inll':)~'; :;::Ir
...,"'... .......0' ....... \e.'c:JU U 'l:::!J \::::I~~ 010, J . ,...
l..n.... ........ ..1..... ""', H J n 0 1 ~ l'tf t i::! c:i:.
1I0u'JapJno'UJnoqloo -'. ~;< <l <iHl! ;
.
.
uu ~ .
, I- .
:J: (i) ~
U l-i ~ III i >- liII !ll III IWi
__ ci:l <l: OZ 2 a:: "I' !:j .l!~ ,!Ii
...J ........ UJ . <l: II I, I I "
~ a. 1= ~ ::E l' 1'1,1;1 ,h !.i 1%
o ........ (/) <( . ::E' Iii ,I 'f I I I '" 111.1111
---c U '" 3!, ;i f.:o . IH _II 'I
\ '; UaJ ~~ ~ ~lillilll!i! ,Illllhlll WI!! !!WI
a.::E it;, II" In I III II III 'hl hlji I III
~ ~ ~ ~ ,I ,1111 III i;l, II! hl!il!!! I
() ~ 1l,!!1I 'I',!ll! i III 11"1 i, I !ill ill!I,Hi III
c. I 1111 l.i... II 3 I I II I
IT:
! .,; i
I : i
,
~"'i,
.. ':' I
...I ;
" .
.~<l _---J
/ //// ~
, /
.' . Eo<
.' , z
.' ,
r ~/ ~
, .... / ......
.,' / ......
.. ..... / (IllIq
J .0- // =
4~ ~' CJ
." .... / <
Eo<
i . Eo<
~ <
," ...... ."'...A... i i
I . .
. .
I !
. ,
I I III ~ ~
, ~ ~ :;;: N
,I ;: E _ _. <('
u "
I ~ ~ .-
~ ~ / ,.... _ _" UJ
.. . w
. . J:
~ 5 (J)
~ :il z
, III ~ J <::
, . u ,- \ '
I 'Z / , /' -
'Z' 8': ./ a..
. / I .~ ~: 1 I 0 :
/ / ~ c/ ~ ~. f - , . .. UJ .
c c: ;: I' - . I .1, t:l
! ~/~ I ,: J / il:: cr
I 0 0.. : t ' ",. / ~..::: <::
a.. a..! 0" I' -_. !"':Y" -oJ
, ,. ~ ~; ~; . .. .:;s:; Z
/ a.. .... . ": ! ~--.J h& i UJ
--:. 'r:--, /' 16~ GO UJ Z
--: ~, a; ! UJ
'v . hI! r./) <l:
- ;.-_ >1 . , ~.... ...J
L . /.' :"'1,"'----- / c.
---/ ' ,'" "\ .____' UJ
". \', '-..~,-! .. -- I-
-~'... \3. 'y;-" ' J I -
'.._ ; ,... (~,1 III
.. ..'... . ... .Il .. . --...... ," - ! ""'ifeu
15 of lE i . AUG 22 1995
-_...,.,.....-......,.,..,..~..
........",,, ., :1:111:1 I"
UU.SI. (I~IJ tCLZI"~ 'olIIP 1111 ~o~, """.11..01 .--..___._....4 i! ~:: : jr
"."..... ......'4'U @.D[i'i)~@~~gQ,jJ@.D~ '. . JOlnn':) ii, i . N
...".... ,."......."". ., H)n01VIV j 'i <
H6U"~Jaf:JJn~'UJnoqlo~ )....... ~. '11 i"
-. . . .
< <;<J <J ;;,; .2 i '0
I"'''~~
. .
< .
. ; "
I~ . z
.~ . !. Q
., 5 ~
" s
<, . - /
c. c . . , m
:::~ .0 I : .
., .
2, fc . ! w
2
". U ' . .
.. , : S
.. ..
I ~ "
w ,
z
: 'j .
~,,- Z "
0 . .
~
f= " ,
" ~ i .
<
,-.t- > I ~ ! !I .
UJ .
n ...J a en .. . !
I ' , UJ i ". i\ i jl !
i jJ~".. :c V!\; ; a
I t-
I c::
of ...... 0
z / \
.
i . r&!
. .
. . w
Z , 2
Z . .
w i i I s I E-o
~ " ,
. . . . w , Z
c ! , ; c I
i ! wo
w i .. r&!
~ 0-
0 ~ ~ .0
. . 0= ::Ill
0 ; ~~
~ : . ..m i
.. =:
I l
I )
.
. -<<
, E-o
J E-o
.......--:----;"......_.... -- <
/ I
---' /' , ~'
, , ,
/ (e __,
"."'/
I :
I
:z
0
f=
<
>
UJ
...J
W
t-
V)
w
5:
AUG 2 2 1995 rTEU 6 4
I
.6 of 16 I
.._..-..... ........,