Item 6 - Annual Review of CalMat-Poway CUP 89-05
- --.-
AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
---"0: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FRO": James L. Bowersox, City "ana~
INITIATED BY: John D. Fitch, Assistant City Manager~)1r ~
Reba Wrlght-Quastler, Director of Plan In
Services
DATE: September 26, 1995
SUBJECT: Annual Review of CalMat-Poway, Conditional Use Permit/Reclamation Plan
89-05
ABSTRACT
Resolutions for CUP/Reclamation Plan 89-05 require an annual review of the CalMat-Poway
aggregate extraction/processing operation. The fourth annual monitoring conducted by
staff and CalMat has demonstrated their conformance with the conditions of approval.
ENVIRON"ENTAL REVIEW
A subsequent EIR was certified on August 7, 1990.
_ FISCAL IMPACT
Mitigation monitoring costs of staff time will be paid by applicant.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
A copy of this report was mailed to Severo Chavez of CalMat and Jim Rostvet of the Creek
Road Residents Association.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this annual report on
CUP/Reclamation Plan 89-05 for CalMat-Poway noting that the five year Interim
Management Plan is active through March 1999.
ACTION
-
1 of 6 SEP 2 6 1995 ITEM .0
~ AGENDA REPOR'l
CITY OF POW A Y
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James L. Bowersox, City Ma~ '
INITIATED BY: John D. Fitch, Assistant City Manager~t ~
Reba Wright-Quastler, Director of Plan ng Services
PROJECT Stephen A. Streeter, Principal Planner ~
PLANNER:
DATE: September 26, 1995
SUBJECT: Annual Review of CalMat-Poway, Conditional Use
Permit/Reclamation Plan 89-05
ABSTRACT
The 1991 resolutions for Conditional Use Permit/Reclamation Plan 89-05 require
an annual review of the CalMat-Poway aggregate extraction and processing
operation. The fourth annual monitoring has been conducted by staff and CalMat
has demonstrated their conformance with the conditions of approval. It is
recommended that the City Council receive and file this annual report on
Conditional Use Permit/ Reclamation Plan S9-05 for CalMat-Poway.
BACKGROUND
The City approved the revised resolution for the reclamation plan on July 23,
1991. The revised resolution for the conditional use permit was approved on
August 20, 1991. The City Council received and filed the third annual report
on Conditional Use Permit and Reclamation Pl an 89-05 for CalMat-Poway on
September 13, 1994.
FINDINGS
The CalMat-poway property was inspected on August 3, 1995 by staff members from
the Engineering, Planning and Safety Services Departments, and Severo Chavez,
CalMat Assistant Manager for Planning and Land Management.
Comments from field trio:
- As of July 1995, CalMat is now receiving water from a water line extended
to K i rkhall Way. The 2 1/2 inch water line previously served off the
General Dynamics water line is now disconnected.
ACTION: I
2 of 6 j
SEP 2 6 1995 ITEM .6
-- -
- Agenda Report
September 26, 1995
Page 2
- As part of the City's strategy to implement AB 939 for reduction of
materials to the County Landfill, the recycling of concrete and asphalt
will be explored with the Public Services Department.
- When the office and vehicle maintenance buil di ng is in use again,
compliance with current access requirements will either require an
elevator to the second story or arrangements to meet persons with physical
disabilities in an appropriate place on the first floor.
- Dumping of debris on CalMat's property adjacent to Scripps Poway Parkway
has not been a problem within the past year.
- Underground tank removal of one gasoline and two diesel tanks is to occur.
Safety Services wants to know the capacity of the tanks and the timing for
removal.
- A Section 404 permit will eventually be needed from the Army Corps of
Engineers to remove the box culvert across the driveway with reclamation
of the original creek alignment.
- Reclaimed water should be usable for future concrete production once
available. The acidity and pH factor of the water will need to be tested.
- The 1996 annual review will be more deta il ed per the reso 1 ut i on of
approval. Page 9 of Resolution No. P-91-48R includes the following
condition under Review Periods and Comoliance:
2. This permit is subject to five year reviews for compliance with
prior conditions and to add new conditions as necessary to ensure
compliance with changes in State, Federal, or local laws.
General comments:
Calmat has not been operating the Poway plant over the prior year due to the
slowdown in construction activities county-wide. There have been no operational
days since 1992. Their Miramar and Lakeside concrete batch plants have been
closed down within the past year.
Security has been an issue for the plant site. Since CalMat personnel or their
subcontractors are rarely on the property, periodic break-ins at the office
building and vandalism to the outbuildings have occurred though none within the
past year.
Landscape maintenance is done about twice a month with some maintenance outside
the fence along the Beeler Canyon Road frontage and the rest done by accessing
the site from Kirkham Way for landscaping and irrigation within the plant site.
3 of 6 ITEM
SEP 2 6 1995 .6
Agenda Report
September 26, 1995
Page 3
When the plant is activated for concrete batch production, a lead time of about
three months will be needed to rewire the machinery and install new parts as
needed. A similar period is needed for the aggregate production plant.
When operations begin again, CalMat will continue to use the balance of the
330,000 cubic yards of stockpiled material obtained several years ago from
Cadillac Fairview before conducting new excavation. This operational procedure
conforms with the conditions and mitigation measures in the resolutions for the
reclamation plan and conditional use permit.
The Engineering Services staff will review the $50,000 reclamation bond once the
CalMat-Poway aggregate facility is operational on a regular basis to determine
whether an annual adjustment is necessary. This condition is to ensure the
reclamation of the existing excavated area at any given time during the life of
the aggregate operation.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A subsequent EIR was certified on August 7, 1990.
FISCAL IMPACT
Mitigation monitoring costs of staff time will be paid by applicant.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
A copy of this report was mailed to Severo Chavez of CalMat and Jim Rostvet of
the Creek Road Residents Association.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this annual report on
Conditional Use Permit/Reclamation Plan 89-05 for CalMat-Poway.
JLB:JDF:RWQ:SAS:kls
Attachment:
A. Mitigation Monitoring Report dated August 3, 1995
e:\c1ty\p1a""tn,\re,.rt\c.,..t4.a'ft
4 of 6 SEP 2 6 1995 ITEM (,
-- -
City of poway
Planning Services Department
Mitigation Monitoring Report
TODAY'S DATE: f~3-9S- o NEG DEC 'f/ EIR: ENVIRONMENTAL
, IMPACT AREA:
SCH#: f'1" /~u;- CERT DATE: f'~7-?~ ~fOl_
a1v #~14ko/ ::{and Use" Plann'ing . .
LEAD ,AGENCY: - ~ransport.tion/circul.tfon
Soil. , Geol_
PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION~ a.I..-'1..r~ n "- !r'HydrolOlY/Drainage
~fr Quol ity
/' H..lth, Safety. Noise
I Muisance Factors
~PRIVATE PROJECT o PUBLIC PROJECT o CUt tunl Resources
ritH ities .. Public Services
a Water GUIll f ty
APN: 32" ~bi/-/R M, ~{, o Public Recreation Facilities
. nesthetics/Visual Qual i ty/
landform Alteration
SPECIFIC ADOPTED MITIGATION MEASURE AND RELATED o Socio-Econo.ic Factors
MONITORING PROGRAM (See attached text from o Energy and Scarce Resources
approved/certified environmental document) o Other
.
INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION: (e.g. , Project Planner)
)ft'~ A.~ffU flrtw~w Pla...,V ORG~~~Y
TITLE ,
NAM
TECHNICAL REPORT REFERENCE: (includes studies and survey reports)
o INITIAL PROJECT-SPECIFIC REPORT .
Title Prepared by/Date
o SUBSEQUENT REPORT(S)
.
Title Prepared by/Date
Title Prepared by/Date
CONDUCT OF MITIGATION MONITORING: (Complete as appropriate)
~~~IANNERL o en;: eeUSl:l'];,qIMIT
~~
~m . Name/Firm
f'-j-9~
Date Date
o ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST o eTIIER
. -
-- Name/Firm Name/Firm
I Date Date
forms\mitigation.rpt(1990) (over)
5 of 6 ATTACHMENT A SEP 2 6 1995 ITEM b
--_.,-- --'-'--"~'--_. ""-
--'_.+~----
DETERMINATON OF MITIGATION COMPLIANCE/COMPLETION:
~CCEPTABLE o UNACCEPTABLE o FOLLOW-UP MONITORING REQUIRED
FOLLOW-UP:
.
,
y ,
,
MITIGATION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: (Indicate as appropriate)
o LEAD AGENCY DEPARTMENT/ o RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION
o STATE AGENCY o FEDERAL AGENCY
.
o RESOURCE AGENCY o STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
o OTHER FIRMS, ORGANIZAITONS, OR INDIVIDUALS, AS NOTED BELOW:
MITIGATION MONITORING SIGN-OFF: as appropriate)
~ROJECT PLANNER: j),., P-.?-9..r-
ature/T~t1e/Date
o crr:: COlJST:Jl.T....~JT:
Signature/Firm/Date
o ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST:
Signature/Firm/Date
o OTHER INDIVIDUAL:
Signature/Firm/Date
THIS REPORT HAS BEEN DISTRIBUTED TO:
o PROJECT PLANNER
~ENTRAL AB 3180 COMPLIANCE FILE
PROJECT PROPONENT/DEVELOPER
liYeIT~ eStlST:ll.'FMIT FlU ,.t14f.rll'-tI-
o ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
~ESPONSIBLE AGENCY
OTHER:
; of 6 SEP 2 6 1995 ITEM b