Res P-92-33NO. P-92-33
A OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF POWAY,
92-06
PARCE NUMBER 3 (LOT 11)
AND DE YING FOR
PARCE NUMBER 3 (LOT 17)
92-06
Diego, requests approval to allow the
foot room to two
at 12837 Court and 14239
zone; and
~ by
Pacific of San
of a 195 square
dwellings located
Drive in the RR-C
on July 14, 1992, the City Council held a duly
public hearing to solicit from the public, both
pro and con, to this
NOW, the City Council does hereby resolve as
'indin :
The ~i~y Council finds that 92-06 is exempt from the
of the Quality Act,
Classes 3 and 5 as the project is an
to an (Class 3) and
a minor to land use (Class 5).
Sec'
1. As to the property known as Parcel Number 314-
050-60 (Lot 11), located at 12837 Court, the
Council finds as
The proposed project is
pla~ in that it proposes an
on
for use.
with the general
to
a lot which is
be
That there are s ecial to
the .property, nd because of this, the str ct
a~ of he Zoning he
proper y of enjoyed by other
in t e under zon ng
The spec 1 with Lot 11
that len support for a is that the lot
shape an topography limit how the property can be
develope . Lot 11 is located on a and
is pie-shaped. An open space a
Page 2
No. P- 92-33
majority of the sloping rear yard, so the residence
has been sited toward the front of the lot which is
more narrow. This results in less space
between the house and the side y lines to
locate an that the side
yard
An additional special which supports a
approval is that the subject lot is
ocated within a subdi ision that is split zoned
RR-C nd PC). The 18 ots within the
re al owed to observe
epend ng on the zone n which they are locate
e lo s located within the PC zone are allowed o
o serve a 15 foot side yard setback wi h
t e lots within the RR-C zone which are to
o serve a 20 f ot side yard of
t e w 11 allow the subject lot to enjoy
t e same priv lege. enjoyed by other properties
w thin the and the immediate vicinity.
That granting the or
for the
substant'ial property .right
property in the same
the is sought.
its is
and of a
p by other
and zoning for which
The will allow the to add a
fourth bedroom to the There are other
four bedroom dwellings in the vicinity.
de
That grantin? the or its will
not be y detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property or
imp in such vicinity and zone in which the
property is
The proposed
impact due to
surrounding
yard
and varied
will not have a negat ye
he fact that the in he
observe d s de
ich help to provide an
pe.
That the granting of this does not
a special ' with
the limitation upon o her properties in the
vicinity and zone in t at many of the houses
in the vicin ty enjoy less side yard
setback req
No. P- 92-33
Page 3
fe
That the granting of this does not allow
the use or activity which is not otherwise
by zoning
the parcel or in
that the pr6posed project is an expansion of a
unit in the Rural - C zone.
As to the property known as
050-66 (Lot 17) located at
Council finds as
Parcel Number 314-
14239 Palisades Drive, the
Special do not exist in that the .Property
is basically rectangular and has a flat
pad area; the is
not y for the and of a
· ~rgperty right p by other property in
the same
The City Council hereby
12837 Court subject to the
92-06 to
Within 30 days of a proval:
that all
and 2) the
on Real P operty.
(1) the applicant shall submit in
of have been read and
owner shall execute a
SH~LL CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT OF
WITH THE FOLLOWINO
The site shall be in
site plan and on file
Dep
in the
with
the approved
The .appropriate ~u%lding Department approvals shall be
prior to of
This permit shall become null and void on July 21, 1994 if
permits have not been issued.
the City Council hereby denies 92-06
to 14239 Drive.
Page 4
No. P- 92-33
and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Poway,
State of California, this 21st day of July 1992.
ATTEST:
mn, City Clerk
STATE OF )
)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
SS.
I, K. city Clerk of the city of Poway, do
hereby certify, under the penalty of perjury, that the foregoing
No. P-92-33 was duly adopted by the city Council
at a meeting of said City Council held on the 21st day of
Ju 1992, and that it was so adopted by the ~
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
EMERY, MCINTYRE, SNESKO, GOLDSMITH
NONE
NONE
HIGGINSON
· ]O~ ~ City Clerk
City d~jPoway