Loading...
Res P-95-02NO. P- 95-02 A OF T E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PO AY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CONDITIONA USE PERMIT 94-17 AND VARIAN ~ 94-10 PARCEL MBER , WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit 94-17 and Variance 94-10, submitted by Ric and Barbara Dudeck, applicants, request the approval to legalize an apartment on the property located at 12859 Luiseno Drive, in the RR-C zone; and WHEREAS, on January 3, 1995, the City Council held a hearing on the above referenced item. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby resolve as follows: Secti : The City Council finds that this project is Categorically Exempt (Classes 3 and 5) from the California E tal Quality Act, as it is a small residential structure, and a minor alteration to land use limitations. Conditional Use Permit 94-17 The approved project is with the general plan in that a second living unit is considered to be an use for a single family residence. That the approved project will not have adverse aesthetic, health, safety or architecturally related impacts upon adjoining properties, in that the unit was built as a room addition to the home. It is not visible to the street, and is architecturally integrated with the main house. That the approved project is in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance, except for the placement of the new carport, for which a variance from minimum side yard setback is sought. All other property development standards are met. That the approved project encourages the orderly and h appearance of structures and property within the City, as dis ussed in Finding #2. The applicants further agree to install a lan scape buffer along the east property line to provide screening of t e new parking area/carport, from the views of the adjoining neigh or to the east. That the . of a small amount of additional traffic will not adversely impact the capacity and physical of surrounding streets. 6. That there are public facilities and utilities available to service the project. Resolution No. P-95-02 Page 2 o That there will not be harmful effects upon tal quality and natura~ in that the property is a suburban lot which has been fully developed as a single-family home site for more than 25 years. Variance 94-10 1. The approved project is t with the general plan as discussed in #1 of CUP findings. That there are special applicable to the property, and because of this, the s ric application of the Zoning Ordinance deprives the property o pr vileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity under iden ica zoning classification. The house was ~ more than twenty years ago stringent zoning setback requirements. At the time of minimum side yard setbacks were ten (10) feet. under less That granting the variance or its modification is necessary for the p and enjoyment of a substantial property right p sessed by other property in the same vicinity and zoning for w.. ch the variance is sought. The variance will permit the placemen of an additional covered space, in a logical location within the ot. That granting the variance or its modification will not be materially d 1 to the public health, safety or welfare, or to the property or imp in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located, in that landscape screening will be provided along the east property line so as to provide a visual buffer to the residence to the east. That the granting of this variance does not constitute a special privilege with the limitation upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in that the property is located in an area where many of the existing homes do not observe the minimum side yard setback due to the age of the structures, and change in development standards which has occurred since their o That the granting of this varia ce does not allow a use or a tivity which is not otherwise express y authorized by zoning deve opment regulations governing the parce or property in that the pro ect is the legalization of an exist ng second living unit, wh ch is permitted in all single-family zones with benefit of a conditional use permit. Seci Council Decision: The City Council hereby approves Conditional Use Permit 94-17 and Variance 94-10, subject to the following conditions: Within 30 days of approval (1) the applicant shall submit in writing that all conditions of approval have been read and understood; and (2) the property owner shall execute a Covenant on Real Property. Resolution No. P-95-02 Page 3 The use ly granted by this permit shall not be such a manner as to interfere with the reasonable use and surrounding residential uses. This conditional use permit shall be subject to annual review by the Director of Planning Services for compliance with the conditions of approval and to address concerns that may have occurred during the past year. If the permit is not in compliance with the conditions of approval, or the Planning Services Department has received complaints, the required annual review shall be set for a public hearing before the City Council, to consider modification or of the use permit. COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS IS REQUIRED. APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES. COMPLIANCE SHALL BE Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved plans on file in the Planning Services D and the conditions contained herein. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Services prior to issuance of building permits. o Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of building permit The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Uniform Fire Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of building permit ' o For each new residential dwelling, 1 or industrial unit(s), the applicant shall pay Permit, Plan Check and Inspection Fees and School Fees at the established rate (in accordance with City-adopted policy and/or ordinance). o A paved, covered parking space shall be ~ and a landscaped buffer shall be installed along the east property line, within 90 days from the date of this approval. An Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fee of $2,500 shall be paid prior to building permit ' The outdoor storage area shall be permanently divided floor to ceiling, from the living space of the second unit. This work shall be completed within 60 days from this approval. o Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current building and zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 10. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code. Resolution No. P-g5-02 Page 4 COHPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS IS REQUIRED. COHPLIANCE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTNENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES. An inspection fee of $500 shall be paid to the Engineering Services Department prior to building permit ' The purposse of the fee is to provide for an inspection of the site to certify proper drainage. The following development impact fees shall be paid to the Engineering Services Department prior to building permit ' Drainage Fee Traffic Mitigation Fee Park Fee $ 950.00 660.00 2,550.00 APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Poway, State of California, this 3rd day of January, 1995. Don Higgir , ~l)r ~/~_~ ATTEST; ~ahl s STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ) ss, ) I, Marjorie K. Wahlsten, Ci y Clerk cer ify, under the penalty of per ury, tha 95- 2, was duly adopted by the Ci y Counci hel on the 3rd day of January, I 95, and fol owing vote: f he City of Poway, do hereby t e foregoing Resolution, No. P- a a meeting of said City Council ha it was so adopted by the AYES: CAFAGNA, CALLERY, HIGGINSON NOES: EMERY, REXFORD ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: NONE City of Poway