Res P-98-71RESOLUTION NO. P- 98-71
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CiTY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA
APPROVING VARIANCE 98-17 and MDRA 98-104
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 275-341-24
WHEREAS, Variance 98-17 and Minor Development Review 98-104 submitted by
Dave and Teresa Price, applicants, request a variance to allow the construction of
additions totaling 1,300 square feet onto the residence located at 13612 Sagewood Drive
within the Rural Residential C zone. The applicants are also requesting a variance
approval to allow the eastedy addition to observe a 16 foot setback when the zone requires
a 20 foot setback.
WHEREAS, pursuant to G I Code Section 66020(d)(1), NOTICE IS
FURTHER GIVEN that the 90-day period to protest the imposition of any fee, dedication,
reservation, or otb described in this resolution begins on the effective date of
this resolution and any such protest must I: that complies with Section 66020.
WHEREAS, on December 15, 1998, the City Council held a duly advertised public
hearing to solicit from the public, both pro and con, relative to this application.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby
follows:
The City Council finds that Vadance 98-17 and Minor Development Review 98-104
are exempt from the provisions of the California E Iai Quality Act,
Categorical Exemption Class 5, a minor alteration to land use limitations and Class
1, an addition to a single family residence.
Variance 98-17
The approved project ' ' ' I with the General Plan in that it involves
the construction of an addition to a single family resid 3ich is
designated for residential use.
o
That there are special 3plicable to the property, and because
of this, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance deprives the property
of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity under identical zoning
classification.
Resolution No. P-98-7!
Page 2
The special -le the fact that the RR-C zone setbacks are
based on lots that are a ' ' ~ one acre in size and the subject lot is
smaller (0.6 acres). The existing floor plan design and site development also
limit where additional development
=
That granting the variance or its modification is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by
other property in the same vicinity and zoning for which the variance is
sought.
=
That granting the variance or its modification will not be materially
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welf ' ' to the property
or imp ~ vicinity and zone in which the property is located in
that th ~ment should not result in a d : privacy on adjoining
lots because of existing mature landscaping in the area that buffer the
properties.
That the granting of this variance does not constitute a special privilege
~ with the I ~)on other properties in the vicinity and zone
in that residential additions have I: :1 on other lots in the area.
=
That the granting of th' does not allow th Iy which is
not otherwise expressly authorized by zoning development regulations
governing the parcel or property in that a single family residence is a
permitted use in the Rural Residential C (RR-C) zone.
That the approved project will not have aC :hetic, health, safety, or
architecturally related impact upon adjoining properties in that the residence
has been designed so that it complies with City design standards.
That the approved project encourages the orderly and h
apl; I :1 property within the City in that the additions will
be architecturally integrated into the design of the existing residence.
MDRA 98-104
The development will not have an adverse aesthetic, health, safety, or
architecturally related impact upon adjoining properties, because the project
has been designed to comply with City design guidelines.
The development encourages the orderly and h
st :1 property within the City through its
standards for residential development throughout the City.
appearance of
! with the high
-- Resolution No. P-98-71
Page 3
The City Council hereby approves Variance 98-17 and Minor Development Review
98-104 subject to the following conditions:
Within 30 days of approval the applicant shall submit in writing that all
conditions of approval have been read and understood.
,ANNING SERVICES
Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the
Planning Services Department and the conditions contained herein.
Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval
shall be submitted to the Planning Services Department prior 1 ~ building
permits.
Approval of this requires shall not ~liance with all " ! the Zoning
Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of building
permit issuance.
The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform
Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Uniform Fire
Code, and all other applicable codes and ord' ~ect at the time of building
permit issuance.
The appropriate Building Department approvals and fees shall be received prior to
the start of
All existing on-site utility poles shall be removed and all new utilities shall be
installed underground. PI :SDG&E Planning Division. Completion of
under grounding shall be accomplished prior to issuance of Certificate of
Occupancy.
Low flow plumbing is required in all
School impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. Currently
school fees are $1.93 per square foot of assessable area.
All created slopes of 5:1 or greater shall be landscaped and a permanent Iow-
'.~ation system shall be installed prior to final occupancy.
-- Resolution No. P-98-71
Page 4
10.
This approval shall b I and void if building permits have not been issued
on the project by December 15, 2000.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS IS REQUIRED. COMPLIANCE
SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICE.
GRADING
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building
Code, City Grading Ordinance, approved grading plan and geotechnical report, and
accepted grading practices.
A grading plan for the development of the property shall be submitted to the City's
Engineer Services Department. If no grading is required, a certification from a State
Registered Civil Engineer indicating the amount of earthwork shall be furnished to
said City's Engineering Services Department and a $500 inspection fee shall be
paid prior to building p
A grading plan for the development of the property, prepared on a 24"x 36"standard
sheet of mylar and drawn at a scale of 1" = 20', shall be submitted to the City's
Engineering Services Department for approval and pay all applicable engineering
and inspection fees prior to issuance of a grading permit and start of grading
operation. Rough grading of the site must be completed and shall meet the City's
Engineering S ~ector's approval.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of
California to perform such work. Copies of the report shall be submitted with the
grading plan.
5. All new slopes shall be a
2:1 (horizontal to vertical).
A final compaction report and a certification of line and grade, prepared by the
project civil engineer shall be submitted upon completion of site grading.
E , including but not limited to desiltation basins, shall be installed and
-1 from Oct. 15th to Apd115th. An Irel plan shall be prepared
by the project civil engineer and shall be submitted as part of the grading plan. The
developer shall make provisions to insure the proper maintenance of all erosion
control devices throughout their intended life.
The construction of driveway if applicable, shall comply with the standards and
specifications provided in section 17.08.170D of the Poway Municipal Code. The
· ' ~ural section shall be shown on the grading plan. Completion of the
driveway must be accomplished prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
Resolution No. P-98-71
Page 5
Construction inspection shall be performed by the Engineering Department
inspectors. The driveway ~all be included in th
for plan checking and determination of inspection fees
A right-of-way permit shall be obtained from the City's Engineering Services
Department for any work to be done within the public street right-of-way or any City-
held easement. Said work shall include, but is not limited to, of
driveway approach, sewer lateral installation, water service line installation, and
street construction.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS IS REQUIRED. COMPLIANCE
SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY SERVICES,
Roof covering shall meet Class A fire retardant testing as specified in the Uniform
Building Standards No. 32-7 for fire retardant roof covering materials, per City of
Poway Ordinance #64.
Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on the building in such a position
as to be plainly visible and legible from the street fronting the properly. Said
numbers shall contrast with their background. Address may be required at private
driveway entrances.
Each chimney used in
spark arrester.
with any fireplace shall be maintained with a
Every building hereafter ~1 shall be accessible to fire department
apparatus by way of :lways with all-weather driving surface of not less
than 20' of unobstructed width, with adequate roadway turning radius capable of
supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus and having a ' ' 113', 6" of
vertical The road surface type shall be approved by the City Engineer,
pursuant to the City of Poway Municipal Code.
o
Dead end access roadways in excess of 150 feet long shall be provided with
approved provisions for the turning around of Fire Department apparatus.
REMENTS FOR DEAD.
WAYS
LENGTH WIDTH
*0' - 150' 20'
'150'-500' 20'
None Required
70' Diameter Cul-de-Sac
70' Hammerhead
-- Resolution No. P-98-71
Page 6
*Curves and topographical conditions could alter the requirements for turnarounds
and the width of .Cs.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Poway, State of
California, this 15th day of December, 1998.
Mic~
ATTEST:
nne Peoples, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)SS.
COUNTY Of SAN DIEGO )
I, Lori Anne Peoples, City Clerk of the City of Poway, do hereby certify, under the
penalty of perjury, that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted by the
City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of
1998, and that it was so adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
EMERY, GOLDBY, HIGGINSON, REXFORD, CAFAGNA
Lo~n ~n':e P~eoples,~C~ty ~ler~'
City of Poway